Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 17: 157-162, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33854943

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the outcomes of single stage surgery for Tandem Spinal Stenosis (TSS) in elderly (Age ≥65 years) and younger patients (Age <65 years). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Tandem spinal stenosis among elderly is common and often missed diagnosed with delayed presentation. Literature evaluating efficacy and safety of single staged surgery for TSS in elderly patients is scanty. METHODS: Analysis of 74 patients with TSS managed with single stage posterior surgery from 2007 to 2016 was done. A total of 62 patients who satisfied our inclusion criteria were evaluated and subdivided into two groups based on age; Study group (age ≥65years)] (n = 32) and control group (age <65years) (n = 30). Perioperative, clinical/radiological parameters and postoperative complications and recovery rate were noted. RESULTS: The Mean ODI and mJOA showed significant improvement post-operatively in both groups however there was no significant difference between the two groups at final follow-up. There was no statistical difference in operative time, blood loss and hospital stay between the groups. As per Odom's criteria, 78.1% had excellent to good results in study group, while 83.3% had excellent to good results in control group. Postoperative complications were more in elderly group however, there was no significant difference among neurological or cardiopulmonary complications between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Single stage surgery is safe & efficacious modality with less morbidity and optimal results in elderly patients with proper preoperative risk assessment. Our study showed that increased age does not proved to be deterrent in the outcome of single staged surgery in tandem spinal stenosis.

2.
Bone Joint J ; 95-B(10): 1388-91, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24078537

RESUMEN

There have been a few reports of patients with a combination of lumbar and thoracic spinal stenosis. We describe six patients who suffered unexpected acute neurological deterioration at a mean of 7.8 days (6 to 10) after lumbar decompressive surgery. Five had progressive weakness and one had recurrent pain in the lower limbs. There was incomplete recovery following subsequent thoracic decompressive surgery. The neurological presentation can be confusing. Patients with compressive myelopathy due to lower thoracic lesions, especially epiconus lesions (T10 to T12/L1 disc level), present with similar symptoms to those with lumbar radiculopathy or cauda equina lesions. Despite the rarity of this condition we advise that patients who undergo lumbar decompressive surgery for stenosis should have sagittal whole spine MRI studies pre-operatively to exclude proximal neurological compression.


Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Errores Diagnósticos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/etiología , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico , Estenosis Espinal/complicaciones , Estenosis Espinal/diagnóstico , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/patología , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA