RESUMEN
Background Choosing the components of free flap (fasciocutaneous or muscle) is one of the crucial but controversial decisions in heel reconstruction. This meta-analysis aims to provide an up-to-date comparison of fasciocutaneous flaps (FCFs) and muscle flaps (MFs) for heel reconstruction and to ascertain if one flap has an advantage over the other. Methods Following the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic literature review was performed identifying studies on heel reconstruction with FCF and MF. Primary outcomes were survival, time of ambulation, sensation, ulceration, gait, need for specialized footwear, revision procedures, and shear. Meta-analyses and Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) were performed to estimate the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with fixed effects and random effects models, respectively. Results Of 757 publications identified, 20 were reviewed including 255 patients with 263 free flaps. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between MF and FCF in terms of survival (RR, 1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83, 1.21), gait abnormality (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.19, 1.59), ulcerations (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.27, 1.54), footwear modification (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26, 1.09), and revision procedures (RR, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.84, 3.32). FCF had superior perception of deep pressure (RR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.32, 3.00), light touch, and pain (RR, 5.17; 95% CI, 2.02, 13.22) compared with MF. Time to full weight-bearing (SMD, -3.03; 95% CI, -4.25, -1.80) was longer for MF compared with FCF. TSA showed inconclusive results for comparison of the survival of flaps, gait assessment, and rates of ulceration. Conclusion Patients reconstructed with FCF had superior sensory recovery and early weight bearing on their reconstructed heels, hence faster return to daily activities compared with MFs. In terms of other outcomes such as footwear modification and revision procedure, both flaps had no statistically significant difference. The results were inconclusive regarding the survival of flaps, gait assessment, and rates of ulceration. Future studies are required to investigate the role of shear on the stability of the reconstructed heels.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The reverse sural artery flap (RSAF) is widely used to reconstruct foot and ankle defects. Although it is commonly used in a nonsensate type, there has been controversy as to whether it provides sufficient stability and durability when applied to weight-bearing heels. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient outcomes after weight-bearing heel coverage using a nonsensate RSAF. METHODS: Twenty-three patients who underwent reconstruction surgery of the weight-bearing heel with RSAF from 2004 to 2018 in a tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. All surgeries were performed without a sensate procedure. The patients' experience of pressure sore on the flap area and the ability to use normal footwear were investigated. Light touch, Semmes-Weinstein test (SWT), and two-point discrimination tests were assessed, along with postoperative wound complications. RESULTS: Heel damage etiologies included malignant tumors in 14 (61%), trauma-related in 7 (30%) and diabetic ulcers in 2 (9%) patients. Patient mean age was 58 years (range, 18-93 years) and the mean follow-up period was 57 months (range, 12-185 months). The mean size of the flap was 64.1 cm2 (range, 20-169 cm2). All flaps healed without major complications. All returned to daily living activities and 20 (86%) patients were able to use normal footwear. Of the 11 patients who had available measurement records, 8 (73%) showed a light touch sense. The mean SWT value was 4.31 (range, 3.61- 4.56). Two-point discrimination was not observed in any of the patients. Two patients had experienced superficial ulcers on the flap within a one-year postoperative period, which spontaneously healed and did not recur. No full-thickness ulcers were observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that patients who underwent nonsensate RSAF for the reconstruction of the heel could expect to maintain the property for stable weight-bearing without pressure sore.