The Application of a New, Modified Algorithm for the Differentiation of Regular Ventricular and Pre-Excited Tachycardias.

BACKGROUND: The three-step Brugada group algorithm is the only published electrocardiographical (ECG) algorithm for differentiating ventricular tachycardia (VT) from pre-excited tachycardia (PXT) as a cause of regular wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT). This study aimed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the Brugada group algorithm. METHODS: This study modified the Brugada group algorithm by adding a new aVR lead criterion (initial positive deflection in lead aVR and the QRS complex area above the baseline is greater than the area below the baseline). The Brugada group algorithm and the new, modified four-step algorithm in 300 WCT ECGs (241 VTs, 59 PXTs) was applied. If any of the criteria were fulfilled, VT was diagnosed; if none were fulfilled, a diagnosis of PXT was established. RESULTS: The test accuracy, VT diagnosis sensitivity, and negative predictive value (NPV) of the new, modified algorithm were significantly greater than that of the Brugada group algorithm: test accuracy 220 of 300 (73%) vs 182 of 300 (61%); sensitivity 73% vs 55% (p<0.001 for both); NPV 40% vs 31% (p=0.0205). The VT diagnosis specificity of the Brugada group algorithm was greater than that of the new, modified algorithm (83% vs 75%; p=0.019). There was no significant difference between the new, modified and Brugada group algorithms in the positive predictive values (92% vs 93%, respectively) for a VT diagnosis, and positive and negative likelihood ratio values (2.87 vs 3.26; 0.36 vs 0.54, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The new, modified algorithm proved to be more sensitive for the differentiation of VT from PXT than the Brugada group algorithm.

Ventriculoatrial interval variation following atrio-His block during wide-QRS-complex tachycardia with 1:1 ventriculoatrial relationship: What is the diagnosis?

A wide QRS-complex tachycardia with 1:1 ventriculoatrial conduction may present diagnostic difficulties, and multiple pacing maneuvers are often required for an accurate diagnosis. We report a case, in which observation of transient ventriculoatrial interval variation following atrio-His block quickly led to the diagnosis.

Specificity of wide QRS complex tachycardia criteria and algorithms in patients with ventricular preexcitation.

BACKGROUND: Despite substantial progress in the field of differentiation between ventricular tachycardia (VT) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with wide QRS complexes, differentiation between VT and preexcited SVT remains largely unresolved due to significant overlap in QRS morphology. Our aim was to assess the specificities of various single ECG criteria and sets of criteria (Brugada algorithm, aVR algorithm, Steurer algorithm, and the VT score) for diagnosis of VT in a sizable cohort of patients with preexcitation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of consecutive accessory pathway ablation procedures to identify preexcited tachycardias. Among 670 accessory pathway ablation procedures, 329 cases with good quality ECG with either bona fide preexcited SVT (n = 30) or a surrogate preexcited SVT (fast paced atrial rhythm with full preexcitation, n = 299) were identified. ECGs were analyzed with the use of wide QRS complex algorithms/criteria to determine specificities of these methods. RESULTS: The Steurer algorithm and VT score (≥3 points), with specificities of 97.6% and 96.1%, respectively, were significantly (p < .01) more specific for the diagnosis of VT than Brugada algorithm, aVR algorithm, and Pava criterion with specificities of 31%, 11.6%, and 57.1%, respectively. The first step of the Brugada algorithm and the first step of the aVR algorithm had also high specificities of 93.3% and 96.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There are sufficient electrocardiographical differences between VT and preexcited SVT to allow electrocardiographic differentiation. VT score, Steurer algorithm, and some single criteria do not overdiagnose VT in patients with preexcitation.

Ventricular tachycardia score - A novel method for wide QRS complex tachycardia differentiation - Explained.

Philosophy, merits and limitations of a novel method for wide QRS complex tachycardia differentiation, based on a scoring system and called the ventricular tachycardia (VT) score, were explained. The following criteria were assigned one point: initial dominant R wave in V1; initial r>40 ms in V1 or V2; notched S in V1; initial R wave in aVR; lead II RWPT≥50 ms; and absence of an RS in leads V1-V6. Atrioventricular dissociation (including fusion/capture beats and partial dissociation) was assigned two points. We recommend ≥3 VT score points for a firm diagnosis of VT. A cut-off ≥1 point can be used for diagnosis of VT when highest overall accuracy rather than error-free diagnosis is desired. However, in case of VT score of 0-2 (i.e., not fully diagnostic ECG), we recommend using other options (electrophysiological study, clinical data, previous and following ECGs, etc.) for confirming the diagnosis.

The ventricular tachycardia score: a novel approach to electrocardiographic diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia.

AIMS: Electrocardiographic diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT) continues to be challenging as none one of the available methods is specific for ventricular tachycardia (VT) diagnosis. We aimed to construct a method for WCT differentiation based on a scoring system, in which ECGs are graded according to the number of VT-specific features. This novel method was validated and compared with Brugada algorithm and other methods. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 786 WCTs (512 VTs) from 587 consecutive patients with a proven diagnosis were analysed by two blinded observers. The VT score method was based on seven ECG features: initial R wave in V1, initial r > 40 ms in V1/V2, notched S in V1, initial R in aVR, lead II R wave peak time ≥50 ms, no RS in V1-V6, and atrioventricular dissociation. Atrioventricular dissociation was assigned two points, and each of the other features was assigned one point. The overall accuracy of VT score ≥1 for VT diagnosis (83%) was higher than that of the aVR (72%, P = 0.001) and Brugada (81%) algorithms. Ventricular tachycardia score ≥3 was present in 66% of VTs and was more specific (99.6%) than any other algorithm/criterion for VT diagnosis. Ventricular tachycardia score ≥4 was present in 33% of VTs and was 100% specific for VT. CONCLUSION: The new ECG-based method provides a certain diagnosis of VT in the majority of patients with VT, identifies unequivocal ECGs, and has superior overall diagnostic accuracy to other ECG methods.

R-wave peak time at lead II in Chinese healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT) is a common arrhythmia. How to differentiate between WCTs is a challenge in clinical practice. Recently R-wave peak time (RWPT) at lead II was reported to be a helpful and simple tool for differentiating WCTs. However, it has remained unknown about the reference range of RWPT at lead II. In present study, we aimed to investigate the reference range of RWPT at lead II in Chinese healthy adults. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College in Southern China. Two thousand four hundred healthy adults aged 21-80 years with no history of structural heart diseases were included. RWPT at lead II was determined. RESULTS: Of 2400 healthy adults, 1200 men and 1200 women were included. The differences of age, mean heart rate and mean QRS duration at lead II between male and female were not significant. RWPT ranged from 16 to 42 ms in male while from 16 to 44 ms in female. The 95 % reference range of RWPT in normal male and female are 19.91 ~ 39.55 ms and 21.75 ~ 37.67 ms, respectively. Compared with the female, the male had a significantly longer RWPT at lead II (29.73 ± 5.01 ms vs 29.71 ± 4.06 ms in female, P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that RWPT at lead II is different between male and female. The male had a significantly longer RWPT at lead II than the female.

A machine learning approach to differentiate wide QRS tachycardia: distinguishing ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis of wide QRS tachycardia (WQCT) has been a challenging issue. Published algorithms to distinguish ventricular tachycardia (VT) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) have limited diagnostic capabilities. METHODS: A total of 278 patients with WQCT from January 2010 to March 2022 were enrolled. The electrophysiological study confirmed SVT in 154 patients and VT in 65 ones. Two hundred nineteen WQCT 12-lead ECGs were randomly divided into development cohort (n = 165) and testing cohort (n = 54) data sets. The development cohort was split into a training group (n = 115) and an internal validation group (n = 50). Forty ECG features extracted from the 219 WQCT ECGs are fed into 9 iteratively trained ML algorithms. This novel ML algorithm was also compared with four published algorithms. RESULTS: In the development cohort, the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model displayed the maximum area under curve (AUC) (0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.00). In the testing cohort, the GBM model had a higher AUC of 0.97 compared to 4 validated ECG algorithms, namely, Brugada (0.68), avR (0.62), RWPTII (0.72), and LLA algorithms (0.70). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the GBM model were 0.94, 0.97, 0.90, 0.94, and 0.95, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A GBM ML model contributes to distinguishing SVT from VT based on surface ECG features. In addition, we were able to identify important indicators for distinguishing WQCT.

Rare electrocardiographic findings in a young woman with acute barium poisoning: A case report.

Background: Barium, as a heavy divalent alkaline earth metal, can be found in various products such as rodenticides, insecticides, depilatories, and fireworks. Barium can be highly toxic upon both acute and chronic exposure. The toxicity of barium compounds is dependent on their solubility. Both suicidal and accidental exposures to soluble barium can cause toxicity. Case summary: We report a case characterized by two different wide QRS complex tachycardia in a patient with acute barium poisoning, one due to barium-induced ventricular tachycardia (VT) under hypokalemia and, subsequently, sino-ventricular conduction with intraventricular conduction delay due to hyperkalemia after aggressive potassium supplementation. The latter may be misdiagnosed as VT for the history of acute barium poisoning and the absence of peaked T wave in hyperkalemia. Of note, another hemodynamically unstable VT and profound hypokalemia occurred during the potassium-lowering therapy, which, in addition to barium poisoning, may also be due to the iatrogenic hypokalemia. We also observed the prominent T-U waves at serum potassium of 4.6 mM 12 hours after admission, which may indicate that barium had not been completely cleared from the plasma at that moment. There are some parallels to the Andersen-Tawil syndrome with prominent T-U waves and risk of ventricular tachycardias. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of conversion from hypokalemia to hyperkalemia, and in a short moment, from hyperkalemia to hypokalemia, in acute barium poisoning. Conclusion: In addition to profound hypokalemia secondary to acute barium poisoning, hyperkalemia may also occur after aggressive potassium supplementation. A more careful rather than too aggressive potassium supplementation may be suitable in these cases of hypokalemia due to an intracellular shift of potassium. And a iatrogenic hypokalemia risk in the treatment of rebound hyperkalemia in barium poisoning must be considered.

Wide QRS tachycardia in a patient with atrial fibrillation: a case report and approach to diagnosis.

Background: Wide QRS complex (QRS) tachycardia in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter treated with antiarrhythmic drugs can occur for a variety of reasons and needs careful evaluation for appropriate management of the patient. Case summary: We report a case of wide QRS complex tachycardia in a patient with AF treated with Flecainide who received multiple external cardioversion attempts for a presumed diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia. Intravenous Diltiazem and an oral beta-blocker led to the resolution of wide QRS complex tachycardia. Discussion: Wide QRS tachycardia due to pro-arrhythmic effect or rate-dependency phenomenon of antiarrhythmic agents should be included in the differentials. In this brief report, we discuss the differential diagnosis and outline a practical approach for acute and long-term management of these patients.

Two cases of wide QRS complex tachycardia caused by anamorelin.

Anamorelin is prescribed for cancer cachexia treatment. Anamorelin is a ghrelin receptor antagonist and exerts a sodium channel blockade effect, possibly inducing disorders of the cardiac conduction system. We herein report two cases of wide QRS complex tachycardia caused by anamorelin. In both cases, the patients had liver dysfunction. Anamorelin is mainly metabolized in the liver; hence, sodium channel blockade by anamorelin during liver dysfunction can cause serious side effects, including wide QRS complex tachycardia, similar to flecainide toxicity. The differential diagnosis of wide QRS tachycardia caused by anamorelin can be challenging because conventional electrocardiogram criteria cannot be applicable in patients with drug intoxication. It can worsen the situation for the use of antiarrhythmic drugs for wide QRS tachycardia. The appropriate treatment is supportive care until anamorelin is metabolized. To our best knowledge, this is the first study to report the life-threatening adverse effects of anamorelin. Learning objective: Anamorelin is prescribed for cancer cachexia treatment. Anamorelin can cause wide QRS complex tachycardia. Our findings in the two cases we encountered indicate that we should be aware of wide QRS complex tachycardia in patients taking anamorelin, especially if they have liver dysfunction. We should suspect the condition to be the adverse effect of anamorelin and monitor the electrocardiogram and blood test findings regularly to prevent this fatal side effect.

Management of hemodynamically stable wide QRS complex tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Management of hemodynamically stable, incessant wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT) in patients who already have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is challenging. First-line treatment is performed by medical staff who have no knowledge on programmed ICD therapy settings and there is always some concern for unexpected ICD shock. In these patients, a structured approach is necessary from presentation to therapy. The present review provides a systematic approach in four distinct phases to guide any physician involved in the management of these patients: PHASE I: assessment of hemodynamic status and use of the magnet to temporarily suspend ICD therapies, especially shocks; identification of possible arrhythmia triggers; risk stratification in case of electrical storm (ES). PHASE II: The preparation phase includes reversal of potential arrhythmia "triggers", mild patient sedation, and patient monitoring for therapy delivery. Based on resource availability and competences, the most adequate therapeutic approach is chosen. This choice depends on whether a device specialist is readily available or not. In the case of ES in a "high-risk" patient an accelerated patient management protocol is advocated, which considers urgent ventricular tachycardia transcatheter ablation with or without mechanical cardiocirculatory support. PHASE III: Therapeutic phase is based on the use of intravenous anti-arrhythmic drugs mostly indicated in this clinical context are presented. Device interrogation is very important in this phase when sustained monomorphic VT diagnosis is confirmed, then ICD ATP algorithms, based on underlying VT cycle length, are proposed. In high-risk patients with intractable ES, intensive patient management considers MCS and transcatheter ablation. PHASE IV: The patient is hospitalized for further diagnostics and management aimed at preventing arrhythmia recurrences.

Simplified Integrated Clinical and Electrocardiographic Algorithm for Differentiation of Wide QRS Complex Tachycardia: The Basel Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Prompt differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT) is crucial to patient management. However, distinguishing ventricular tachycardia (VT) from supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with wide QRS complexes remains problematic, especially for nonelectrophysiologists. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop a simple-to-use algorithm with integration of clinical and electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters for the differential diagnosis of WCT. METHODS: The 12-lead ECGs of 206 monomorphic WCTs (153 VT, 53 SVT) with electrophysiology-confirmed diagnoses were analyzed. In the novel Basel algorithm, VT was diagnosed in the presence of at least 2 of the following criteria: 1) clinical high risk features; 2) lead II time to first peak >40 ms; and 3) lead aVR time to first peak >40 ms. The algorithm was externally validated in 203 consecutive WCT cases (151 VT, 52 SVT). Its' diagnostic performance and clinical applicability were compared with those of the Brugada and Vereckei algorithms. RESULTS: The Basel algorithm showed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92%, 89%, and 91%, respectively, in the derivation cohort and 93%, 90%, and 93%, respectively, in the validation cohort. There were no significant differences in the performance characteristics between the 3 algorithms. The evaluation of the clinical applicability of the Basel algorithm showed similar diagnostic accuracy compared with the Brugada algorithm (80% vs 81%; P = 1.00), but superiority compared with the Vereckei algorithm (72%; P = 0.03). The Basel algorithm, however, enabled a faster diagnosis (median 36 seconds vs 105 seconds for the Brugada algorithm [P = 0.002] and 50 seconds for the Vereckei algorithm [P = 0.02]). CONCLUSIONS: The novel Basel algorithm based on simple clinical and ECG criteria allows for a rapid and accurate differential diagnosis of WCT.

Wide QRS complex tachycardia after surgical repair of an isolated atrial septal defect: What is the mechanism?

Macroreentrant atrial tachycardia within the right atrium is the dominant mechanism in patients with prior surgical repair of atrial septal defects, with dual-loop circuits much more common than single-loop circuits. This case highlights the importance of clinical history for predicting arrhythmia mechanisms. Considering prior cardiac surgery may assist in preprocedural preparations and discussions regarding potential risks and benefits of catheter ablation.

Simple electrocardiographic criteria for rapid identification of wide QRS complex tachycardia: The new limb lead algorithm.

BACKGROUND: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is essential for the differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a novel ECG algorithm on the basis of the morphological characteristics of the QRS on the limb leads. METHODS: The limb lead algorithm (LLA) was evaluated by analyzing 528 monomorphic WCTs with electrophysiology-confirmed diagnoses. In the LLA, ventricular tachycardia (VT) is diagnosed in the presence of at least 1 of the following: (1) monophasic R wave in lead aVR; (2) predominantly negative QRS in leads I, II, and III; and (3) opposing QRS complex in the limb leads: concordant monophasic QRS in all 3 inferior leads and concordant monophasic QRS in 2 or 3 of the remaining limb leads with a polarity opposite to that of the inferior leads. The diagnostic performance of the LLA was compared with that of the Brugada, Vereckei, and R-wave peak time (RWPT) algorithms. RESULTS: Of 528 WCT cases, 397 were VT and 131 supraventricular tachycardia. The interobserver agreement for the LLA was excellent (κ = 0.98), better than that for the other algorithms. The overall accuracy of the LLA (88.1%) was similar to that of Brugada (85.4%) and Vereckei (88.1%) algorithms but was higher than that of the RWPT algorithm (70.8%). The LLA had a lower sensitivity (87.2%) than did Brugada (94.0%) and Vereckei (92.4%) algorithms, but not the RWPT algorithm (67.8%). Furthermore, the LLA showed a higher specificity (90.8%) than did Brugada (59.5%), Vereckei (76.3%), and RWPT (80.2%) algorithms. CONCLUSION: The LLA is a simple yet accurate method to diagnose VT when approaching WCTs on the ECG.

Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation of Vagal Mechanism with Episodes of Wide QRS Complex Tachycardia Due to Gouaux-Ashman's Phenomenon.

A 38-year-old male patient consulted for nocturnal palpitations described as fast chest pounding that woke him up from sleep. A physical examination yielded no remarkable findings. A 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring demonstrated nocturnal episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) with the coexistence of wide QRS complex tachycardia. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of nocturnal episodes of wide QRS complex tachycardia during vagally mediated PAF resulting from Gouaux-Ashman's phenomenon. It is paramount for general physicians to recognize this phenomenon because it should be differentiated from ventricular tachycardia, since prognosis and treatment of both entities are entirely different. General and emergency physicians should be aware in order to improve adequate diagnostic and therapeutic management of the arrhythmic episodes.

Advanced Cardiac Signal Recording.

Implantable loop recorders allow prolonged and continuous single-lead electrocardiogram recording, with the pivotal addition of remote monitoring. They have significantly shortened time to electrocardiographic diagnosis and appropriate therapy of many bradyarrhythmias/tachyarrhythmias and proved helpful in arrhythmia burden definition, offering invaluable information in the diagnostic workup for syncope and atrial fibrillation. Advanced cardiac signal recording is also possible by transesophageal catheters. They have been used to orient diagnosis during wide and narrow QRS complex tachycardias and also to perform minimally invasive pacing. Intracardiac electrophysiologic study remains, however, essential for diagnosis of several arrhythmias in the perspective of curative catheter ablation.

Challenging Cases of Wide Complex Tachycardias: Use and Limits of Algorithms.

Electrocardiographic algorithms are particularly useful to differentiate, in the presence of a wide complex tachycardia, between supraventricular aberrancy and ventricular tachycardias (VT). There are numerous limitations to the sensitivity and specificity of these algorithms including the presence of accessory pathways, use of antiarrhythmic drugs, congenital heart diseases, electrolytes impairments, and artificial pacing. Once the diagnosis of VT has been reached, other algorithms can help in localizing the origin of the ventricular arrhythmia. These approaches are also limited by the anatomic structure of where the arrhythmia originates. This article illustrates the difficulties in applying common algorithms in many clinical circumstances.