Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with other targeted or immunological therapy regimens for the treatment of advanced bile tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and aims: A single immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) regimen has limited value in treating advanced bile tract cancer (BTC); therefore, ICI combination therapy is often applied. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICI combination therapy for advanced BTC. Methods: The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023452422). Data on the median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) reported in relevant studies were pooled and analyzed to determine the efficacy and safety of ICI combination therapy. Results: In total, 15 studies with 665 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The overall ORR and DCR were 34.6% and 77.6%, respectively. The overall median PFS and OS were 6.06 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.91-7.21] and 12.11 months (95% CI: 10.66-13.55), respectively. Patients receiving ICI combination therapy in addition to other therapies had a considerably prolonged median PFS and OS (z=9.69, p<0.001 and z=16.17, p<0.001). Patients treated as first-line treatment had a substantially longer median PFS and OS compared to patients treated as non-first-line treatment (z=11.19, p<0.001 and z=49.17, p<0.001). The overall pooled grade ≥3 AEs rate was 38.2% (95% CI: 0.268-0.497) and was not influenced by whether ICI therapy was combined with other treatments or not or the treatment line. Conclusion: Advanced BTC patients may benefit from ICI combination treatment without additional AEs. However, concurrent chemotherapy or radiotherapy is still needed to achieve better outcomes. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023452422.

Cholangiocarcinoma: what are the options in all comers and how has the advent of molecular profiling opened the way to personalised medicine ?

Cholangiocarcinoma is a deadly cancer comprising very heterogenous subtypes with a limited therapeutic arsenal in all comers. However, recent significant advances were made with immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma, with the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy showing a survival benefit. In the second line setting, only FOLFOX (5FU/folinic acid-oxaliplatin) is validated by a phase 3 trial, yet with a very modest benefit on survival; new options using 5FU with nanoliposomal-irinotecan may emerge in the next few years. The advent of molecular profiling in advanced cholangiocarcinoma in the last decade revealed frequent targetable alterations such as IDH1 mutations, FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, HER2 amplification, BRAF V600E mutation and others. This strategy opened the way to personalised medicine for patients which are still fit after first-line treatment and the use of targeted inhibitors in first line constitutes a huge challenge with many ongoing trials to improve patients' care. This review exposes the recent clinical trial findings in non-molecularly selected advanced cholangiocarcinoma, offers a focus on how systematic molecular screening should be structured to allow patients to access to personalised medicine, and details which are the therapeutic options accessible in case of actionable alteration.

Associations of Racial and Ethnic Category, Age, Comorbidities, and Socioeconomic Factors on Concordance to NCCN Guidelines for Patients With High-Risk Biliary Tract Cancers After Surgery.

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) have a limited prognosis even for localized cancers, emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary management. NCCN guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) +/- radiotherapy (RT) for high-risk disease. We analyzed the association between racial and ethnic category along with other demographic factors and concordance to NCCN guidelines among patients following surgery for high-risk BTC. Methods: Subjects were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for BTC patients who underwent surgery and found to have metastatic lymph nodes (LN+) or positive surgical margins (M+) from 2004 to 2015. We defined concordance to NCCN guidelines as receiving surgery + CT +/- RT and non-concordance to the guidelines as surgery +/- RT. Descriptive studies and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: A total of 3,792 patients were identified with approximately half being female (55.4%) and between the ages of 50-69 (52.8%). Most were White (76.3%) followed by Black (10.6%), Hispanic (8.5%), and Asian (5.3%). The BTC included extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) (48.6%), gallbladder cancer (43.5%), and intrahepatic CCA (7.9%). Most patients had an M- resection (71.9%) but also had LN+ disease (88.0%). There were no significant differences between racial groups in disease presentation (histological grade, tumor stage) and surgical outcomes (LN+, M+, hospital readmission, and 90 day post-surgery mortality). Hispanic patients as compared to White patients were less likely to be insured (85.7% vs 96.3%, p<0.001) and less likely to be treated at an academic facility (42.1% vs 52.1%, p=0.008). Overall, almost one-third (29.7%) of patients received non-concordant NCCN guideline care with Hispanic patients having the highest proportion of non-concordance as compared to Whites patients (36.1% vs 28.7%, p=0.029). On multivariate analysis, Hispanic ethnicity (HR=1.51, 95% CI: 1.15-1.99) remained significantly associated with non-concordance to NCCN guidelines. Conclusion: This study indicates that Hispanic patients with high-risk BTC are significantly less likely to receive NCCN-concordant treatment in comparison to White patients. More research is needed to confirm and understand the observed disparities and guide targeted interventions at the system-level.

Development of gallbladder cancer during follow-up of pancreaticobiliary maljunction: a report of two cases.

Pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) is a congenital malformation. The reflux of pancreatic juice into the biliary tract caused by PBM plays a significant role in the development of biliary tract cancers (BTCs), such as gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Previous studies have demonstrated a high incidence of BTC in patients with PBM. However, there are only a few reports of patients who developed BTC after a diagnosis of PBM. We report the cases of two patients who developed gallbladder cancer after being diagnosed with PBM. They had refused treatment and were being managed with follow-up observation alone after the diagnosis of PBM and developed gallbladder cancer after several years of observation. Thus, surgical treatment should be recommended for all patients with PBM in order to prevent the development of BTC. Moreover, long-term, close, regular follow-up is necessary to facilitate the early diagnosis of subsequent BTC in patients with untreated PBM.

Pembrolizumab combined with lenvatinib as non-first-line therapy in patients with refractory biliary tract carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A therapeutic strategy involving combined treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (LEP) has demonstrated a relatively high antitumor response in several solid tumors; however, the efficacy and safety of LEP in patients with refractory bile tract carcinoma (BTC) remains unknown. METHODS: This is a single-arm study for a preliminary assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of LEP in patients who experienced progression from prior systemic treatments. Pre-treatment tumor tissues were collected to retrospectively evaluate the expression status of PDL1. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients received second-line and above treatment with LEP. Overall, the objective response rate (ORR) was 25%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 78.1%, and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 40.5%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 months (95% CI: 4.7-5.2 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 11.0 months (95% CI: 9.6-12.3 months). For tolerability, no grade 5 serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. All patients had any-grade AEs, and 59.3% of the patients experienced grade 3 AEs, while only 1 patient experienced a grade 4 AE of stomach bleeding. Fatigue was the most common AE, followed by hypertension and elevated aminotransferase levels. Retrospective analysis for PDL1 expression revealed that PDL1 positive tumor cells were associated with improved clinical benefits and survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: LEP is a promising alternative as a non-first-line therapeutic regimen for patients with refractory BTC. Furthermore, well-designed prospective clinical trials with a control arm are still needed to obtain more evidences to confirm the efficacy and safety of this particular regimen as well as the role of PDL1 expression.