Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 1068, 2019 Nov 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31703574

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates inherited risk in the aetiology of lung cancer, although smoking exposure is the major attributing factor. Family history is a simple substitute for inherited susceptibility. Previous studies have shown some possible yet conflicting links between family history of cancer and EGFR mutation in lung cancer. As EGFR-mutated lung cancer favours female, never-smoker, adenocarcinoma and Asians, it may be argued that there may be some underlying genetic modifiers responsible for the pathogenesis of EGFR mutation. METHODS: We searched four databases for all original articles on family history of malignancy and EGFR mutation status in lung cancer published up to July 2018. We performed a meta-analysis by using a random-effects model and odds ratio estimates. Heterogeneity and sensitivity were also investigated. Then we conducted a second literature research to curate case reports of familial lung cancers who studied both germline cancer predisposing genes and their somatic EGFR mutation status; and explored the possible links between cancer predisposing genes and EGFR mutation. RESULTS: Eleven studies have been included in the meta-analysis. There is a significantly higher likelihood of EGFR mutation in lung cancer patients with family history of cancer than their counterparts without family history, preferentially in Asians (OR = 1.35[1.06-1.71], P = 0.01), those diagnosed with adenocarcinomas ((OR = 1.47[1.14-1.89], P = 0.003) and those with lung cancer-affected relatives (first and second-degree: OR = 1.53[1.18-1.99], P = 0.001; first-degree: OR = 1.76[1.36-2.28, P < 0.0001]). Familial lung cancers more likely have concurrent EGFR mutations along with mutations in their germline cancer predisposition genes including EGFR T790 M, BRCA2 and TP53. Certain mechanisms may contribute to the combination preferences between inherited mutations and somatic ones. CONCLUSIONS: Potential genetic modifiers may contribute to somatic EGFR mutation in lung cancer, although current data is limited. Further studies on this topic are needed, which may help to unveil lung carcinogenesis pathways. However, caution is warranted in data interpretation due to limited cases available for the current study.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Adenocarcinoma/etnología , Adulto , Anciano , Pueblo Asiatico/genética , Receptores ErbB/genética , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etnología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Autoinforme , Fumar , Adulto Joven
2.
Soc Sci Med ; 266: 113360, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32979625

RESUMEN

Breast cancer has become the most frequent cancer among women in Vietnam, claiming over 6000 lives a year. In this article we investigate how laypeople explain the causes of this pressing health issue based on an ethnographic study conducted in the Central region of Vietnam in 2019, including hospital observation, interviews with 33 breast cancer patients and focus groups with 21 laypeople. Our findings show that their knowledge of causation is mediated through historical social contexts of warfare, a rapacious market economy, poverty, and cultural configurations of gender roles. Contamination of the environment and food, use of chemicals, failure to follow postpartum practices, breast ailments, and worry are understood to be immediate determinants of breast cancer. These popular accounts are unlikely to recognize biomedical narratives of breast cancer risk that focus upon individual responsibility and lifestyle factors because they may not reflect the lived realities of women. We emphasise the implications for public awareness campaigns to meaningfully engage with the situated social and cultural specificities of breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Pobreza , Medio Social , Vietnam/epidemiología
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31421745

RESUMEN

The last decade witnessed an increase in the use of comet assay for DNA damage monitoring in cancer patients and controls. Apart from case-control studies, reports described the determination of DNA damage prior to (baseline value) and after chemo-/radiotherapy, the treatment resulted in significantly elevated DNA damage. However, studies on DNA damage as a factor reflecting cancer prognosis and therapy prediction are scarce. In most cases, DNA damage was analysed in surrogate tissues. The data on DNA damage are available for 17 types of cancer. The reviewed data unambiguously pinpoint the usefulness of the comet assay in human cancer research due to its sensitivity and cost-effectiveness in evaluating DNA damage associated with the disease and with the treatment. DNA repair capacity (DRC) represents a complex marker for functional evaluation of multigene DNA repair processes in cancer onset with future prospects in personalized prevention and/or cancer treatment. A comparison between studies and more general conclusions are precluded by a variable design of the studies and a lack of standard protocol for both DNA damage and DRC determination. Since cancer is a heterogeneous complex disease, numerous points have to be considered: a) DNA damage and DRC measured in surrogate/target tissues, b) changes in the levels of DNA damage and DRC may be a cause or a consequence of the disease, c) changes in DRC alter sensitivity of tumour cells to antineoplastic drugs, d) one time point-sampling of patients provides insufficient information on the role of DNA damage and its repair in carcinogenesis. Finally, systemic cancer therapy is targeted at DNA damage and its repair. A proper understanding of these processes is a key precondition for the optimisation of therapy regimens, prediction of therapeutic response and prognosis in cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Ensayo Cometa , Daño del ADN , Reparación del ADN , Neoplasias/genética , Células Sanguíneas/química , Carcinoma/genética , Carcinoma/metabolismo , Ensayo Cometa/economía , Ensayo Cometa/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , ADN/sangre , Roturas del ADN , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Células Epiteliales/química , Femenino , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Masculino , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/metabolismo , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/terapia , Especificidad de Órganos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Espermatozoides/química
4.
Methods Protoc ; 2(4)2019 Nov 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31766274

RESUMEN

DNA in dividing cells is prone to mutagenesis, with mutations making key contributions to human disease including cancer. The tumour suppressor gene TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in human tumours. Here, we present a robust protocol for studying TP53 mutagenesis utilising human TP53 knock-in (Hupki) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (HUFs). In the HUF immortalisation assay (HIMA), primary HUFs are treated with known or suspected carcinogens at 3% oxygen and then transferred to 20% atmospheric oxygen to induce senescence. Cells containing mutations (e.g., in TP53) that allow bypassing of senescence eventually emerge as immortalised clonal cell lines after 2-3 months of serial passaging. As not all immortalised HUF cells contain TP53 mutations, we developed a Nutlin-3a counter-screen to select for TP53-mutated clones prior to sequencing. TP53 mutation spectra generated can be compared with those of human tumours recorded in the International Agency for Research on Cancer TP53 mutation database. Environmental mutagens that have demonstrated and validated the utility of the HIMA include ultraviolet radiation, aristolochic acid, and benzo[a]pyrene. The TP53 mutation patterns induced by these mutagens in the HIMA corresponded to those found in human tumours from patients exposed to these mutagens. The approach presented helps to deepen our understanding of human cancer aetiology.

5.
J Mol Med (Berl) ; 96(8): 725-739, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29959475

RESUMEN

Transcription factors (TFs) participate in a wide range of cellular processes due to their inherent function as essential regulatory proteins. Their dysfunction has been linked to numerous human diseases. The forkhead box (FOX) family of TFs belongs to the "winged helix" superfamily, consisting of proteins sharing a related winged helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif. FOX genes have been extensively present during vertebrates and invertebrates' evolution, participating in numerous molecular cascades and biological functions, such as embryonic development and organogenesis, cell cycle regulation, metabolism control, stem cell niche maintenance, signal transduction, and many others. FOXD1, a forkhead TF, has been related to different key biological processes such as kidney and retina development and embryo implantation. FOXD1 dysfunction has been linked to different pathologies, thereby constituting a diagnostic biomarker and a promising target for future therapies. This paper aims to present, for the first time, a comprehensive review of FOXD1's role in mouse development and human disease. Molecular, structural, and functional aspects of FOXD1 are presented in light of physiological and pathogenic conditions, including its role in human disease aetiology, such as cancer and recurrent pregnancy loss. Taken together, the information given here should enable a better understanding of FOXD1 function for basic science researchers and clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Desarrollo Embrionario , Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/genética , Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/metabolismo , Animales , Desarrollo Embrionario/genética , Femenino , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Especificidad de Órganos , Organogénesis/genética , Embarazo , Transducción de Señal
6.
Int J Epidemiol ; 46(1): 86-95, 2017 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27818374

RESUMEN

Background: Associations of reproductive history with breast cancer risk differ by oestrogen receptor (ER±) status and possibly by the joint expression of ER and the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (ER±/HER2±). However, large sample sizes are needed to establish ER-specific risks by HER2± expression. Methods: We linked a cancer registry covering nearly 95% of the primary breast cancer diagnoses in Denmark with a research parity database to assess associations for parity, number of live births and age at first live birth (AFLB) with receptor-specific risk. Relative risks (RRs) for associations were estimated with Poisson regression models. Results: With nearly 31 million women-years of follow-up, 45 786 Danish women aged 20-84 years developed invasive breast cancer during 1992-2011. ER± expression was available for the entire study period and HER2± after 2006. Of the breast cancers with known ER expression, 79% were ER+. Most breast cancers with known ER and HER2 were HER2- (90% of ER+ cancers and 65% of ER- cancers). RRs differed by ER± expression for all reproductive variables ( p -homogeneity < 0.001). Associations were stronger for ER+ than ER- cancers and for those diagnosed before age 50. Parity and early [not later] AFLB showed a protective association with ER+/HER2- and risk association with ER-/HER2- cancers. Conclusion: Associations of reproductive history with breast cancer risk varied among Danish women by ER± and ER±/HER2± expression and age-at-diagnosis, consistent with receptor-specific and age-related etiological heterogeneity. Further stratification by HER2 status demonstrated dual (or opposite) effects for ER+/HER2- and ER-/HER2- cancers.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Receptores de Estrógenos/genética , Historia Reproductiva , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paridad , Embarazo , Sistema de Registros , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
7.
Hereditary Genet ; 2013(Suppl 2)2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34589269

RESUMEN

Known genetic mutations and familial hereditary factors account for less than 20-25% of breast cancer cases in women, therefore, most instances have been classified as sporadic cases of unknown aetiologies. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were considered as breast cancer risk factors, but numerous studies have failed to support this assertion. Recent evidence correlates aberrant epigenetic mechanisms in the development and metastatic progression of breast cancer, yet there has been limited progress made to identify the primary aetiology underlying sporadic cases of breast cancer. This has led some researchers to consider alternative hypotheses including in utero exposure to deleterious chemical agents during early development, the immortal strand and the strand-specific imprinting and selective chromatid segregation hypotheses. Here, we integrate prominent alternate models to help guide future research on this very important topic concerning human health.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA