RESUMEN
We present a case of a rare complication in a 10-month-old female referred to our institution for an anal stricture after primary cloacal repair as an infant. Multimodal imaging, careful physical exam, and endoscopic evaluation revealed her vagina had been pulled through to the location of her anal sphincter muscle complex. We describe the correction of this problem, including identification of her rectum.
RESUMEN
Herein we present a case of 5-month-old female born with a cloaca. She underwent a colostomy at birth and then underwent endoscopy and cloacagram to plan for the definitive reconstruction. The case is presented with a focus on the reconstructive strategies, and questions for the readers are posed in a quiz format.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Precise and accurate measurement of the common channel and urethra is a critical determinant prior to the repair of cloacal malformations. Endoscopy and 3D reconstruction cloacagram are two common modalities utilized to help plan the surgical approach, however the consistency between these methods is unknown. METHODS: Common channel and urethral lengths obtained by endoscopy and 3D cloacagram of cloaca patients at six pediatric colorectal centers were compared. Data are given as mean (range). RESULTS: 72 patients were included in the study. Common channel measurements determined by 3D cloacagram and endoscopy were equal in 7 cases (10%). Endoscopic measurements of the common channel were longer than 3D cloacagram in 20 (28%) cases and shorter in the remaining 44 (62%) cases. The absolute difference between measurements of the common channel was 7.2â¯mm (0-2.4â¯cm). Urethral measurements by both modalities were equal in 8 cases (12%). Endoscopic measurement of the urethra was longer than that by 3D cloacagram in 20 (31%) patients and shorter in 37 (57%) of cases. The absolute difference between measurements of the urethra was 5.1â¯mm (0-2.0â¯cm). The reconstruction (e.g. TUM or urogenital separation) that would be performed according to measurements determined by 3D cloacagram and endoscopic measurements differed in 13/62 (21%) patients with each structure identified and common channel measurements of >1â¯cm. CONCLUSION: Significant variation exists in the measurements of the common channel and urethra in patients with cloacal malformations as determined by endoscopy and 3D cloacagram. This variation should be considered as these measurements influence the decision to perform either a TUM or urogenital separation. Based on these findings, 3D cloacagram should be performed in all patients prior to cloaca repair to prevent mischaracterization of the malformation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Asunto(s)
Cloaca , Endoscopía , Imagenología Tridimensional , Uretra , Cloaca/anomalías , Cloaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Cloaca/cirugía , Humanos , Lactante , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagen , Uretra/cirugía , Anomalías Urogenitales/diagnóstico por imagen , Anomalías Urogenitales/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cloacal anomalies are complex to manage, and the anatomy affects prognosis and management. Assessment historically includes examination under anesthesia, and genitography is often performed, but these do not consistently capture three-dimensional (3D) detail or spatial relationships of the anatomic structures. Three-dimensional reconstruction cloacagrams can provide a high level of detail including channel measurements and the level of the cloaca (<3 cm vs. >3 cm), which typically determines the approach for surgical reconstruction and can impact long-term prognosis. Yet this imaging modality has not yet been directly compared with intra-operative or endoscopic findings. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to compare 3D reconstruction cloacagrams with endoscopic and intraoperative findings, as well as to describe the use of 3D printing to create models for surgical planning and education. STUDY DESIGN: An IRB-approved retrospective review of all cloaca patients seen by our multi-disciplinary program from 2014 to 2016 was performed. All patients underwent examination under anesthesia, endoscopy, 3D reconstruction cloacagram, and subsequent reconstructive surgery at a later date. Patient characteristics, intraoperative details, and measurements from endoscopy and cloacagram were reviewed and compared. One of the 3D cloacagrams was reformatted for 3D printing to create a model for surgical planning. RESULTS: Four patients were included for review, with the Figure illustrating 3D cloacagram results. Measurements of common channel length and urethral length were similar between modalities, particularly with confirming the level of cloaca. No patient experienced any complications or adverse effects from cloacagram or endoscopy. A model was successfully created from cloacagram images with the use of 3D printing technology. DISCUSSION: Accurate preoperative assessment for cloacal anomalies is important for counseling and surgical planning. Three-dimensional cloacagrams have been shown to yield a high level of anatomic detail. Here, cloacagram measurements are shown to correlate well with endoscopic and intraoperative findings with regards to level of cloaca and Müllerian development. Measurement discrepancies may be due to technical variation indicating a need for further evaluation. The translation of the cloacagram images into a 3D printed model demonstrates potential applications of these models for pre-operative planning and education of both families and trainees. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, 3D reconstruction cloacagrams yielded accurate measurements of urethral length and level of cloaca common channel and urethral length, similar to those found on endoscopy. Three-dimensional models can be printed from using cloacagram images, and may be useful for surgical planning and education.