Prospective evaluation of ultrasound features of magnesium-based bioabsorbable screw resorption in pediatric fractures.

OBJECTIVE: Bioabsorbable magnesium-based alloy screws release gas upon resorption. The resulting findings in the adjacent soft tissues and joints may mimic infection. The aim of the study was to evaluate the ultrasound (US) findings in soft tissues and joints during screw resorption. METHODS: Prospectively acquired US studies from pediatric patients treated with magnesium screws were evaluated for screw head visibility, posterior acoustic shadowing, twinkling artifact, foreign body granuloma, gas (soft tissue, intra-articular), alterations of the skin and subcutaneous fat, perifascial fluid, localized fluid collections, hypervascularization, and joint effusion. RESULTS: Sixty-six US studies of 28 pediatric patients (nfemale = 9, nmale = 19) were included. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 10.84 years; the mean time between surgery and ultrasound was 128.3 days (range = 6-468 days). The screw head and posterior acoustic shadowing were visible in 100% of the studies, twinkling artifact in 6.1%, foreign body granuloma in 92.4%, gas locules in soft tissue in 100% and intra-articular in 18.2%, hyperechogenicity of the subcutaneous fat in 90.9%, cobblestoning of the subcutaneous fat in 24.2%, loss of normal differentiation between the epidermis/dermis and the subcutaneous fat in 57.6%, localized fluid collection in 9.9%, perifascial fluid in 12.1%, hypervascularization in 27.3%, and joint effusion in 18.2%. CONCLUSION: US findings in pediatric patients treated with magnesium screws strongly resemble infection, but are normal findings in the setting of screw resorption. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Bioabsorbable magnesium-based alloy screws release gas during resorption. The resulting US findings in the adjacent soft tissues and joints in pediatric patients may mimic infection, but are normal findings. KEY POINTS: • Bioabsorbable magnesium-based alloy screws release gas upon resorption. • The resulting ultrasound findings in children's soft tissues and joints closely resemble those of soft tissue infection or osteosynthesis-associated infection. • Be familiar with these ultrasound findings in order to avoid inadvertently misdiagnosing a soft tissue infection or osteosynthesis-associated infection.

Straight intramedullary MultiLoc nails for displaced proximal humeral fractures: health status, radiographic results, clinical outcome, and complications.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of the displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHF) still facing a lot of unsolved problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of MultiLoc nails for the treatment of PHF and present outcomes of patients with different Neer's classification and reduction quality. METHODS: Adult patients with PHFs were recruited and treated with MultiLoc nail. Intraoperative data, radiographic and functional outcomes, as well as occurrence of postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: 48 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this study. The DASH Score were 32.2 ± 3.1 points at 12 months, and 37.3 ± 2.5 points at the final follow-up. The mean ASES score at 12 months and final follow-up were 74.4 ± 6.2 and 78.8 ± 5.1, respectively. The mean CM Score in all 48 patients reached 68 ± 6.4 points at the final follow-up, relative side related CM Score 75.2 ± 7.7% of contralateral extremity. The incidence rate of complications was 20.8%. Patients with fracture mal-union, adhesive capsulitis were observed but no secondary surgeries were performed. There was no significantly difference of DASH Score 12 months after surgery and at the last follow-up among patients with different Neer's classification or reduction quality. However, functional outcomes such as ASES score and CM score were significantly influenced by severity of fracture and the quality of fracture reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that MultiLoc nails is well suited for proximal humeral fractures, with satisfactory health status recovery, good radiographic results, positive clinical outcomes and low rates of complications. The treatment for four part PHF still faces great challenges. Accurate fracture reduction was an important factor for good functional result.

Pre-sliding technique to improve femoral neck system against the shortening: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of using pre-sliding technique to prevent postoperative shortening of displaced femoral neck fracture fixed with femoral neck system (FNS). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 110 cases of displaced femoral neck fracture treated with femoral neck system from September 2019 to November 2022 in our center, which were divided into 56 cases in the pre-sliding group and 54 cases in the traditional group. The baseline data such as gender, age, side, mechanism of injury, fracture type, operation time, intraoperative bleeding were recorded and compared between the two groups, and the quality of fracture reduction, shortening distance, Tip Apex Distance (TAD), union time, Harris score of the hip were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The TAD value of the pre-sliding group was smaller than that of the traditional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The shortening distance in both groups on postoperative day 1 was smaller in the pre-sliding group than in the traditional group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.07), and the shortening distance was smaller than in the traditional group at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and the difference was statistically significant (all P < 0.001). Of the 110 cases, 34 (30.9%) had moderate or severe shortening, of which 24 (44.4%) were in the traditional group and 10 (17.9%) in the pre-sliding group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001), and the Harris score at 1 year, which was higher in the pre-sliding group than in the traditional group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison of baseline data such as gender, age, side, mechanism of injury, fracture type, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and quality of reduction between the two groups (all P > 0.05), and no statistically significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups (P = 0.113). CONCLUSION: The use of the pre-sliding technique of displaced femoral neck fracture fixed with FNS reduces the incidence of moderate and severe shortening, improves the postoperative TAD value, and improves the hip function scores, with a satisfactory midterm efficacy.

Hexaxial external fixator versus intramedullary nail in treating segmental tibial fractures: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: It's difficult to treat segmental tibial fractures (STFs), which are intricate injuries associated with significant soft tissue damage. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effect of hexaxial external fixator (HEF) and intramedullary nail (IMN) in treatment of STFs. METHODS: A total of 42 patients with STFs were finally recruited between January 2018 and June 2022. There were 25 males and 17 females with age range of 20 to 60 years. All fractures were classified as type 42C2 using the Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosythese/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification. 22 patients were treated with HEF and 20 patients were treated with IMN. The condition of vascular and neural injuries, time of full weight bearing, bone union time and infection rate were documented and analyzed between the two groups. The mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), mechanical posterior proximal tibial angle (mPPTA), mechanical lateral distal tibial angle (mLDTA), mechanical anterior distal tibial angle (mADTA), hospital for special surgery (HSS) knee joint score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle joint score, range of motion (ROM) of flexion of keen joint and ROM of plantar flexion and dorsal flexion of ankle joint were compared between the two groups at the last clinical visit. RESULTS: There were no vascular and neural injuries or other severe complications in both groups. All 22 patients in HEF group underwent closed reduction but 3 patients in IMN group were treated by open reduction. The time of full weight bearing was (11.3 ± 3.2) days in HEF group and (67.8 ± 5.8) days in IMN group(P < 0.05), with bone union time for (6.9 ± 0.8) months and (7.7 ± 1.4) months, respectively(P < 0.05). There was no deep infection in both groups. In the HEF group and IMN group, mMPTA was (86.9 ± 1.5)° and (89.7 ± 1.8)°(P < 0.05), mPPTA was (80.8 ± 1.9)° and (78.6 ± 2.0)°(P < 0.05), mLDTA was (88.5 ± 1.7)° and (90.3 ± 1.7)°(P < 0.05), while mADTA was (80.8 ± 1.5)° and (78.4 ± 1.3)°(P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups at the last clinical visit concerning HSS knee joint score and AOFAS ankle joint score, ROM of flexion of keen joint and ROM of plantar flexion of ankle joint (P > 0.05). The ROM of dorsal flexion of ankle joint in IMN group was (30.4 ± 3.5)°, better than (21.6 ± 2.8)° in HEF group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In terms of final clinical outcomes, the use of either HEF or IMN for STFs can achieve good therapeutic effects. While HEF is superior to IMN in terms of completely closed reduction, early full weight bearing, early bone union and alignment. Nevertheless, HEF has a greater impact on the ROM of dorsal flexion of the ankle joint, and much more care and adjustment are needed for the patients than IMN.

Traumatic bilateral acetabular fracture secondary to high-energy trauma in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral acetabular fracture is a very rare presentation among the trauma patients, as the pattern and the degree of the forces required to fracture both acetabula is very unique. The primary purpose of this study is to report a series of adult patients presenting with post-traumatic bilateral acetabular fracture without any history of pathological or metabolic bone disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 18 cases of traumatic bilateral acetabular fracture were included. There was predominance of both column (four patients on left and six on right) followed by anterior column (two patients left and four on right) and posterior wall (three patients left and right). They were treated surgically through open reduction and internal fixation. All cases were followed up for at least 13 months. Matta's criteria were used for radiological evaluation on plain radiographs. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Merle d'Aubigne and postel score at final follow-up. RESULTS: No patients were lost during the follow-up period; there was one case of surgical site infection. There were three cases of postoperative osteoarthritis, one case of heterotrophic ossification, one case of persistent sciatic nerve palsy and one case of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy. The radiological evaluation according to Matta's criteria revealed anatomic reduction in 12 patients, imperfect reduction in three patients while other three patients had poor reduction. According to modified Merle d'Aubigne and Postel score, 10 cases were rated as excellent, five cases as good and three cases presented fair (one case) to poor (two cases) results. CONCLUSION: We report an unusual case series of bilateral acetabular fracture successfully managed surgically with good clinical outcome. With the increasing incidence of route traffic accidents, such cases would probably be recurrent in the upcoming years.

Optimal Screw Orientation for Fixation of Coronal Shear Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison.

OBJECTIVE: Coronal shear fractures of the capitellum are rare injuries which can be challenging to treat. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of different internal screw fixation techniques for Dubberley type IA fractures of the capitellum. METHODS: In this biomechanical study, Dubberley type IA fractures of the capitellum were created in 30 human fresh-frozen humeri. The specimens were then divided into three groups: fixation was either performed with 3 x 3.0 mm headless cannulated compression screws (HCCSs) in anteroposterior (AP) orientation (AP group), 3 x 3.0 mm HCCSs in posteroanterior (PA) orientation (PA group) or with 2 x 3.0 mm HCCSs in PA orientation and 1 x 3.0 mm HCCS in lateral orientation (LAT group). Displacement under cyclic loading and ultimate load-to-failure were evaluated in all specimens. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in fragment displacement after 2000 cycles between AP and PA groups (0.8 ± 0.5 mm vs. 0.8 ± 0.6 mm; p = 0.987) or PA and LAT groups (0.8 ± 0.6 mm vs. 0.8 ± 0.3 mm; p = 0.966). LAT group showed the highest load-to-failure (548 ± 250 N) without reaching statistically significant difference to AP group (388 ± 173 N; p = 0.101). There was also no significant difference between AP and PA groups (388 ± 173 N vs. 422 ± 114 N; p = 0.649). CONCLUSIONS: Variations in screw placement had no statistically significant influence on cyclic displacement or load-to-failure in Dubberley Type IA fractures. However, fracture fixation in two planes - both the coronal and the sagittal plane - by adding a screw in a lateral to medial direction may be beneficial to increase primary stability.

Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures After Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic humerus fracture is a relatively rare complication following shoulder arthroplasty. As shoulder arthroplasty volume increases, more periprosthetic fractures are anticipated. Some surgeons routinely operate on humerus shaft fractures adjacent to a humeral stem, while others recommend first-line nonoperative treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the prevalence of operative and nonoperative treatment options for periprosthetic humerus fractures, their associated outcomes, and complications. Our goal was to provide clinical insights for surgeons on the outcomes and complications associated with various treatment options. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of studies reporting clinical or radiographic outcomes and complications after operative or nonoperative treatment of postoperative periprosthetic humerus fractures following shoulder arthroplasty. Subgroup analysis was conducted for differences in surgical outcomes between open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and revision arthroplasty. RESULTS: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria (196 humeri). The mean clinical follow-up period was 2.6 years. Most fractures were Cofield B (42%), followed by C (27%), and A (12%); 19% were not classified. Forty-two percent of index implants were reverse total shoulders, 27% anatomic total shoulders, 16% hemiarthroplasties, and 1% resurfacing; implant design was not reported for 14%. The average time from index procedure to fracture was 2.9 years. One hundred sixty-seven (85%) fractures were treated operatively, 26 (13%) were treated nonoperatively, and 3 (2%) were missing information. Overall complication rate was 46%. Nonoperatively treated fractures had a higher complication rate (69% vs 43%, P = 0.04) and increased risk of malunion (19% vs 1%, P = < 0.001). Nonoperative management failed in 57% of Cofield B fractures. Time to union was shorter in the ORIF group than the revision arthroplasty group (24 weeks vs 30 weeks, P < 0.001). Among operatively treated fractures, revision arthroplasty was associated with more complications (61% vs 25%, P = 0.04) and higher nonunion rates (22% vs 0%, P = 0.008) than ORIF. CONCLUSIONS: Complications may be more frequent than previously understood. With a 70% healing rate, nonoperative management is a viable treatment option, but should be weighed against high risk of complications and need for future procedures, especially in Cofield B fractures. Treatment with ORIF is associated with a higher union rate and fewer complications than revision arthroplasty.

Definitive internal fracture fixation followed by staged free flap coverage ("fix followed by flap" protocol) for open Gustilo type IIIB fractures.

BACKGROUND: Although the concept of the "fix and flap" approach, in which definitive fracture fixation and flap coverage are completed in a single procedure at the earliest opportunity may seem ideal for the treatment of Gustilo type IIIB open fractures, the individual circumstances of patients, such as polytrauma or multiple fracture cases may not allow for the immediate fracture fixation and flap coverage ("fix and flap" approach). In our hospital, patients with Gustilo type IIIB open fractures are treated with definitive internal fixation of the fracture followed by staged flap coverage ("fix followed by flap" protocol) when the "fix and flap" approach was not feasible due to the patient's condition or difficulty in coordinating surgery schedules. The "fix followed by flap" protocol provides benefits in terms of flexibility in adjusting the surgical timetable, simplifying the planning of flap coverage following fracture fixation, and minimizing individual surgical invasion. METHODS: We reviewed 10 cases of severe open fractures treated with the "fix followed by flap" protocol and evaluated their outcomes. All surgical procedures, including wound debridement, fracture fixation, and flap coverage, were performed by orthoplastic surgeons specializing in both fracture surgery and microsurgery including soft tissue reconstruction. RESULTS: All free flaps survived, and no partial necrosis was observed. None of the patients developed postoperative deep infection up to the last follow-up. Fracture union was achieved in all patients with or without autologous bone grafts. The median time for union was 9.4 months (range, 4-12 months). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents favorable outcomes of treatment for Gustilo type IIIB open fractures with fracture fixation followed by staged flap coverage ("fix followed by flap" protocol). Despite a delay in flap coverage, the consistency of treatment provided by orthoplastic surgeons may have contributed to the favorable outcomes in this study.

Standard or Fin SIGN® nail? which option is better for the treatment of femoral fractures in low and middle-income countries?

PURPOSE: Femoral fractures are common in low and middle-income countries (LMIC), predominantly caused by high-energy trauma. The surgical implant generation network (SIGN®) program offers two different intramedullary nails in LMIC which are designed to be used without image intensifier free of charge for the patients: the SIGN standard nail (SSN®) and the SIGN Fin nail (SFN®). This study aimed to compare the results of the SSN® and the SFN® for the treatment of middle and distal shaft femoral fractures through a retrograde approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive, and non-experimental study including all consecutive patients who underwent surgical management of middle or distal shaft femoral fracture between January 2017 and May 2022 in an NGO hospital located in Freetown, Sierra Leone. The duration of surgery, type of reduction, complications like screw loosening, implant migration, anterior knee pain and non-union rate at six months of follow up were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were included in the study. Group A: 60 patients were managed with SSN® and Group B: 62 patients with SFN®. The mean operative time was 104 min with SSN® and 78 with SFN® (p < 0.001). Open reduction of the fracture was necessary in ten (16.7%) patients with SSN® and 12 (19.4%) patients treated with SFN® (p = 0.69). Non-union was observed in one (1.7%) patient with SSN® and two (3.2%) patients with SFN® (p = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Both options seem equally effective in treating midshaft and distal femoral shaft fractures. The SFN® reduces the surgical time, due to this fact, in polytraumatized patients, patients with bilateral femur fracture or patients with ipsilateral tibia fracture, it can be considered as the best option to be used. There was no statistical difference in the complications presented by the two groups.

Open reduction and internal fixation of paediatric maxillozygomatic complex fractures: An 11-year multicentric retrospective study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Paediatric maxillozygomatic complex (MZC) fractures are uncommon, and there is a scarcity of data regarding their surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to analyse choices and outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for MZC fractures among 14 maxillofacial centers around the world. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicentric retrospective observational study included patients ≤16 years of age with quadripod MZC fractures treated with ORIF from January 2011 and December 2022. The following data were collected: age, gender, dentition stage (deciduous, mixed, and permanent), cause of injury, type of fracture, surgical approach, site of osteosynthesis (infraorbital rim, zygomaticomaxillary buttress, frontozygomatic, and zygomaticotemporal sutures), material (titanium or resorbable) and number of plates used, and outcome. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. Statistical analyses were performed with Fisher's exact test or chi-squared test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (mean age, 12.3 years) with quadripod MZC fractures were included. Seventy-two percent of patients received a single-point fixation. The zygomaticomaxillary buttress was the most common site for fixation, both in single-point and two-point fixation schemes, especially in combination with the frontozygomatic suture. Increasing age was associated with a higher rate of plate removal (p < .001). Postoperative complications included 5 (7.8%) cases of wound infections, 2 (3.1%) infraorbital paraesthesia, 1 (1.6%) ectropion. Residual facial asymmetry was found in 5 (7.8%) patients and was not associated with the type of fixation (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the possibility of using ORIF, even with a single point of fixation, for the treatment of displaced quadripod MZC fractures in the paediatric population. The zygomaticomaxillary buttress was the preferred site of fixation and allowed for adequate stabilization with no external scars and a low risk of tooth damage. Future prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to establish definitive surgical protocols and clarify the surgical decision-making.

Poor usability of computer-assisted navigation for hip fracture surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The STRYKER ADAPT computer-assisted navigation system provides intraoperative feedback to the surgeon regarding implant placement of the Gamma3 nail. The usability of the ADAPT system has not been evaluated. The aim of the study was to investigate the perceived usability of the ADAPT system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive study with prospectively collected data. ADAPT was introduced at Aarhus University Hospital in February 2021. Prior to introduction, surgeons at the department attended a general introduction to the system. ADAPT was introduced to the surgical nurses and was on display at the surgical ward at more than one occasion, where personal introduction to the system was possible. After introduction, it was mandatory to use ADAPT when using the Gamma3 nail to treat intertrochanteric femur fractures. After each procedure, primary and an eventual supervisor answered a questionnaire, which encompassed the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire. The SUS is a ten-item questionnaire regarding the perceived usability of a system. SUS scores were translated to adjectives, describing user experience on a 7-point adjective scale (worst imaginable, awful, poor, ok, good, excellent, best imaginable). User acceptability, defined as "not acceptable", "marginal" or "acceptable", was also used to interpret the SUS scores. RESULTS: ADAPT was used in 50 procedures by 29 different surgeons, with varying skill-level. Median SUS-score after first-time use of ADAPT for all 29 surgeons was 43 (range: 5-60), which translated to "poor" or "not acceptable". For surgeons who performed ≥ 3 ADAPT-assisted procedures, there were no statistically significant difference in their first to latest SUS-score (median difference: 4.3, p = 0.5). In free text comments ADAPT was positively described as helpful in placement of K-wire and providing educational opportunities for inexperienced surgeons and negatively as inconsistent, slow, time consuming, and causing excessive fluoroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Usability and acceptability of ADAPT was rated as "poor" or "not acceptable" by the majority of operating surgeons. ADAPT has not been used at our institution based on these findings. The System Usability Scale may be used in further research exploring usability and acceptability of novel computer-assisted navigation systems for orthopaedic surgery.

Anatomical study of the safety corridor for bridge plating positioned on the lateral border of the humerus.

PURPOSE: This study shows the danger zone and the safety corridor in the lateral approach with bridge plating by measuring the distance between the lateral side of the plate positioned on the lateral aspect of the humerus and the radial nerve after it pierces the lateral intermuscular septum, in the different forearm positions. METHODS: Forty arms of 20 human cadavers were used, the radial nerve was identified and marked on the lateral surface the radial nerve at the exit of the lateral intermuscular septum and anteriorisation of the nerve in relation to the humeral shaft and the lateral epicondyle was also marked. The distances were measured with a digital caliper. A submuscular extraperiosteal corridor was created, proximally between the biceps brachialis and deltoid muscle and distally between the triceps and brachioradialis muscle, followed by the positioning of the low contact large fragments contoured plate with 14 combined holes (fixed and cortical angle), inserted from distal to proximal. Measurements were performed in four positions (elbow flexion with forearm pronation, elbow flexion with forearm supination, elbow extension with forearm pronation and elbow extension with forearm supination). RESULTS: Significant statistical differences occurred with the different positions, and the elbow flexion with forearm supination was shown to be the position that provides the safest submuscular extraperiosteal corridor in a lateral approach of the humerus. CONCLUSION: The danger zone of radial nerve is an area that extends from 15 cm to 5 cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle and the safest way to create a submuscular and extraperiosteal corridor in the lateral region of the humerus is with the elbow in flexion and the forearm in supination.

Assessing the effectiveness of intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in a low-income setting: a prospective study in Yemen.

BACKGROUND: Tibial shaft fractures are common injuries that can be treated with various methods, including interlocked intramedullary nail (IMN). However, there is limited data on the clinical outcomes of IMN for tibial shaft fractures in Yemen. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of primary IMN for tibial shaft fractures in Yemen. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 134 patients who underwent primary IMN for tibial shaft fractures et al.-Thawra Modern General Hospital in Sana'a, Yemen, between June 2016 and June 2020. The patients were between 18 and 70 years old, and the fractures were classified according to the AO classification system. The fractures were treated with IMN using a standard technique. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The outcome measures included union time, complications, and functional scores. RESULTS: The mean union time was 17 weeks. The overall complication rate was 18.7%. The most common complications were infection (8.2%), delayed union (6.7%), and nonunion (3.7%). The mean functional scores at the final follow-up were 91.4 for the Knee Society Score and 90.2 for the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Score. CONCLUSION: Primary IMN is an effective and reliable method for treating tibial shaft fractures in Yemen, with acceptable union time, complication rate, and functional outcomes.

Is reduction necessary in overriding metaphyseal distal radius fractures in children under 11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the necessity of reduction in the treatment of overriding metaphyseal distal radius fractures (DRF) in children under 11 years. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to retrieve studies published from inception to 2023. Two reviewers independently screened for studies with observational or randomized control design comparing two treatments for overriding metaphyseal DRF in patients under 11 years: simple casting without reduction (SC group) versus closed reduction plus casting or pin fixation (CRC/F group); with varying outcomes reported (CRD471761). The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS: Out of 3,024 screened studies, three met the inclusion criteria, 180 children (mean age 7.1 ± 0.9 years) with overriding metaphyseal DRF: SC-group (n = 79) versus CRC/F-group (n = 101). Both treatment groups achieved 100% fracture consolidation without requiring further manipulation. The SC-group showed significantly fewer complications (mean difference [MD] 0.08; 95% CI [0.01, 0.53]; I2 = 22%; P < 0.009) and trends towards better sagittal alignment (MD 5.11; 95% CI [11.92, 1.71]; I2 = 94%; P < 0.14), less reinterventions (MD 0.31; 95% CI [0.01, 8.31]; P < 0.48), and fewer patients with motion limitation at the end of follow-up (MD 0.23; 95% CI [0.03,  1.98]; P < 0.18), although these findings were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a limited number of studies comparing SC versus CRC/F in overriding DRF in children under 11 years, this study suggests that anatomical reduction is not necessary. Treating these fractures with SC, even when presenting with an overriding position, leads to reduced complications, shows a trend towards fewer reinterventions, improved sagittal alignment, and less limitation in patient motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Systematic review of Level-III studies.

Femoral neck osteosynthesis using interfragmentary compression or position screw in synthetic bones. What are the mechanical differences?

PURPOSE: We aim to compare interfragmentary compression with the position osteosynthesis in the fixation of different femoral neck fractures (FN) in synthetic bones subjected to vertical load. METHODS: Forty-two synthetic femurs were subjected to neck fractures and separated into 3 groups according to the Pauwels classification: Pauwels I had 6 units (PI); Pauwels II, 24 units, with and without comminution (PII); and Pauwels III, 12 units, with and without comminution (PIII). After, they were fixed with 2 different ways: three 7, 0 mm cannulated lag screws (CSs) versus three 6, 5 mm solid fully threaded screws (SSs). Screws positioning was oriented by the Pauwels classification: inverted triangle or crossed screws. All specimens were submitted to vertical loading until failure. RESULTS: The average force was 79.4 ± 22.6 Kgf. The greatest one was recorded in model 1 (135.6 Kgf), and the lowest in model 41 (39.6 Kgf). CSs and SSs had similar resistance until failure (p = 0.2). PI showed heightened resistance and PIII showed a worse response (p < 0,01). CSs had better performance in PIII (p = 0.048). Comminution and screws orientation caused no difference on peak force (p = 0.918 and p = 0.340, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In synthetic bones, the resistance of a femoral neck fracture osteosynthesis using a 7, 0 mm cannulated lag screw or 6, 5 mm solid fully threaded screw are similar. There was no loss of efficiency with comminution in the femoral neck. Osteosynthesis resistance decreased with the verticalization of the fracture line and, in the more vertical ones, interfragmentary compression with CSs was more resistant than positional osteosynthesis with SSs.

Optimizing periprosthetic fracture management and in-hospital outcome: insights from the PIPPAS multicentric study of 1387 cases in Spain.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of all periprosthetic fractures (PPF), which require complex surgical treatment associated with high morbidity and mortality, is predicted to increase. The evolving surgical management has created a knowledge gap regarding its impact on immediate outcomes. This study aimed to describe current management strategies for PPF and their repercussions for in-hospital outcomes as well as to evaluate their implications for the community. METHODS: PIPPAS (Peri-Implant PeriProsthetic Survival Analysis) was a prospective multicentre observational study of 1387 PPF performed during 2021. Descriptive statistics summarized the epidemiology, fracture characteristics, management, and immediate outcomes. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was employed to evaluate potential predictors of in-hospital mortality, complications, discharge status, and weight-bearing restrictions. RESULTS: The study encompassed 32 (2.3%) shoulder, 4 (0.3%) elbow, 751 (54.1%) hip, 590 (42.5%) knee, and 10 (0.7%) ankle PPF. Patients were older (median 84 years, IQR 77-89), frail [median clinical frailty scale (CFS) 5, IQR 3-6], presented at least one comorbidity [median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) 5, IQR 4-7], were community dwelling (81.8%), and had outdoor ambulation ability (65.6%). Femoral knee PPF were most frequently associated with uncemented femoral components, while femoral hip PPF occurred equally in cemented and uncemented stems. Patients were managed surgically (82%), with co-management (73.9%), through open approaches (85.9%) after almost 4 days (IQR, 51.9-153.6 h), with prosthesis revision performed in 33.8% of femoral hip PPF and 6.5% of femoral knee PPF. For half of the patients, the discharge instructions mandated weight-bearing restrictions. In-hospital mortality rates were 5.2% for all PPF and 6.2% for femoral hip PPF. Frailty, age > 84 years, mild cognitive impairment, CFS > 3, CCI > 3, and non-geriatric involvement were candidate predictors for in-hospital mortality, medical complications, and discharge to a nursing care facility. Management involving revision arthroplasty by experienced surgeons favoured full weight-bearing, while an open surgical approach favoured weight-bearing restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: Current arthroplasty fixation check and revision rates deviate from established guidelines, yet full weight-bearing is favoured. A surgical delay of over 100 h and a lack of geriatric co-management were related to in-hospital mortality and medical complications. This study recommends judicious hypoaggressive approaches. Addressing complications and individualizing the surgical strategy can lead to enhanced functional outcomes, alleviating the economic and social burdens upon hospital discharge. Level of Evidence Level IV case series. TRIAL REGISTRATION: registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04663893), protocol ID: PI 20-2041.

Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures in Severe Injury Is Not Associated With Worse Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine whether surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is associated with worse outcomes in individuals with multicompartmental injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective trauma registry was performed for adult blunt trauma patients (aged ≥ 18 y) with Injury Severity Score ≥ 15 and radiographic evidence of rib fractures (2015-2020). Individuals without concomitant head, abdomen/pelvis, or lower extremity Abbreviated Injury Scale scores ≥ 3 were excluded. Propensity match on demographic and clinical variables was performed comparing patients treated nonoperatively (NO) to those undergoing SSRF. A chart review was performed for additional data. Primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit LOS, and duration of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred ninety three patients fit the inclusion criteria (NO = 1,951, SSRF = 42). After matching, there were 98 in the NO group and 42 in the SSRF group. Mean age was 51 y, 61.4% were male, and 71.4% were of White race. Median time to fixation was 5 d. The SSRF group had more severe chest trauma as evidenced by a higher RibScore (3.2 versus 1.7, P < 0.001) and had a longer LOS (18 versus 9 d, P < 0.001), intensive care unit LOS (13 versus 3 d, P = 0.007), and duration of mechanical ventilation (8 versus 2 d, P = 0.013) on univariate analysis. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated no association between SSRF and these short-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite delayed average time to intervention, SSRF in a trauma-patient population with multicompartmental injuries and competing management priorities is not associated with worse short-term outcomes.

Pediatric cartilaginous lateral femoral condyle Hoffa fracture: a case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Hoffa fractures are challenging coronally-oriented articular injuries of the femoral condyle. These fractures are rare in adults and extremely rare in the skeletally immature, with few cases reported in literature. To prevent mal- or non-union, Hoffa fractures require prompt surgical stabilisation with anatomic reduction and internal fixation. CASE REPORT: We discuss the case of a lateral distal femoral condyle cartilaginous Hoffa fracture in a ten-year-old male patient. The patient presented after a football non-contact "twist and pop" injury with radiographic imaging described as an osteochondritis dissecans lesion. An MRI was obtained which demonstrated a lateral distal femoral condyle osteochondral fracture. An operative plan was formulated to perform arthroscopic reduction and bio-compression screw fixation to minimize damage to the physis and surrounding tissues. Hyperflexion of the knee allowed for anatomic fracture reduction with the placement of 2 bio-compression screws serving as maintenance of fixation. The patient did well postoperatively and returned to full activity after 6 months. CONCLUSION: Hoffa fractures in the pediatric population are rare and can occur not only through bone but also through the thick chondral layer in younger patients. These are extremely difficult to diagnose through X-Ray alone. The prompt use of MRI imaging allows for operative fixation in a timely fashion, while an arthroscopic-only approach allows for minimal tissue damage. With an appropriate fracture type, hyper-flexion reduces and stabilizes the fracture, permitting the placement of minimally invasive bio-compression fixation.

Comparison of the ALPS and PHILOS plating systems in proximal humeral fracture fixation - a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Open reduction and plate osteosynthesis are considered as a successful technique for the treatment of proximal humerus fracture (PHF) despite high complication rates. The objective of our study was to review the clinical outcome and complications of the Anatomic Locking Plate System (ALPS) and compare it to the Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS). Our hypothesis was that ranges of motion (ROM) were superior and complication rates were lower with ALPS. METHODS: Twenty patients treated with ALPS for PHF were retrospectively compared to 27 patients treated with PHILOS. Union, ROM and complications were clinically and radiologically assessed at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 18-24 months post-operatively. RESULTS: Mean age was 52 ± 14 in the ALPS group and 58 ± 13 in the PHILOS group. Last follow-ups were conducted at a mean of 20.6 ± 4.8 months. Mean shoulder abduction was superior with ALPS by 14° (p-value = 0.036), 15° (p-value = 0.049), and 15° (p-value = 0.049) at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively. Mean shoulder external rotation was superior with ALPS by 11° (p-value = 0.032), 15° (p-value = 0.010) and 12° (p-value = 0.016) at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months respectively. At the end of the follow-up, ROM remained better with ALPS, but not significantly. Complication rates over 21 months reached 20% with ALPS and 48% with PHILOS (p-value = 0.045). Implant removal rates reached 10% with ALPS and 37% with PHILOS (p-value = 0.036). Avascular necrosis was the only cause for hardware removal in the ALPS group. CONCLUSION: The ALPS group showed better clinical outcomes with faster recovery in abduction and external rotation, although no difference in ROM remained after 21 months. Additionally, the complications rate was lower at last follow up. In our experience, the ALPS plating system is an effective management option in some PHF.

Mechanical study of the application of compression screw nails in the cross-inverted triangular pattern for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To design a cross-inverted triangular pattern to insert compression screw nails for the treatment of femoral neck fractures and to compare the biomechanics of inserting compression screw nails in cross-inverted triangular patterns and inverted triangular patterns. I am very sorry that a corresponding author needs to be added to the article. I do not know how to insert it, so I make a note here. Please check the attachment I uploaded. METHODS: The reasonableness of the model is first analyzed using finite elements. A total of 6 adult human specimens were selected, of which 3 males and 3 females were divided into the A1, B1, and C1 groups and the A2, B2, and C2 groups by the random number table method. The A1 and A2 groups were made into subhead femoral neck fracture models, the B1 and B2 groups were made into trans-neck femoral neck fracture models, and the C1 and C2 groups were made into basal femoral neck fracture models. The right femur of each group had a compression screw nail inserted in the crossed-inverted triangular pattern, and the left femur of each group had a compression screw nail inserted in the inverted triangular pattern. The static compression test was performed by an electronic universal testing machine. The maximum load of the femoral neck and the load of 3.00 mm axial displacement of the femoral head were read according to the pressure-displacement curve drawn in the experiment. RESULTS: The finite element analysis showed that the cross-inverted triangular hollow threaded nail has better conductivity and more stable fixation than the inverted triangular hollow threaded nail. The maximum load of the femoral neck and the load of 3.00 mm axial displacement of the femoral head of the left femur were greater than those of the right femur in the A1, A2, B1, B2 and C2 groups, while the maximum load of the femoral neck and the load of 3.00 mm axial displacement of the femoral head of the left femur were smaller than those of the right femur in the C1 group. There was no statistically significant difference in the maximum load of the femoral neck or the load of 3.00 mm axial displacement of the femoral head between the A1 and A2 groups, the B1 and B2 groups, or the C1 and C2 groups (P > 0.05). After the K-S test, the maximum load of the femoral neck and the load of 3.00 mm axial displacement of the femoral head were normally distributed (P = 0.20), and the LSD-t test was conducted for the two load data; the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.235). CONCLUSION: The effect of compression screw nails in the cross-inverted triangular pattern was the same in males and females, and stability was better in the fixation of subhead and trans-neck femoral neck fractures. However, its stability in fixation of basal femoral neck fracture is worse than that of the inverted triangular pattern. The cross-inverted triangular hollow threaded nail has better conductivity and more stable fixation than the inverted triangular hollow threaded nail.