Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in women with normal ovarian response to the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol using different trigger methods: a single-center retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) combined with human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) can improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with normal ovarian response (NOR). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data of 404 NOR patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer (ET) from 2018 to 2022 were studied. Patients were divided into HCG group and HCG plus GnRH-a group according to trigger methods. After confounding factors were controlled by propensity score matching, 67 cases were included in HCG group and HCG plus GnRH-a group, respectively, and pregnancy outcomes were assessed. Basal data, ovarian stimulation, embryological data and pregnancy outcomes were compared. The effect of trigger methods on pregnancy outcomes was analyzed by binary logistic regression. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant differences in embryological data, embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate of ET, number of fresh embryos transferred and total number of embryos transferred after one cycle of oocyte retrieval. While, cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was better in the dual-trigger group than in the HCG group. The binary logistic regression analysis indicated that the trigger methods had an independent influence on embryo implantation and cumulative live birth. CONCLUSIONS: During IVF/ICSI, dual-trigger could potentially play a role in improving oocyte quality, ensuring embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate of ET and cumulative live birth rate at the end of one ovum pick-up (OPU) cycle, and reducing the physical, temporal and financial negative consequences due to repeated OPU cycle.

The effect of luteinizing hormone changes in GnRH antagonist protocol on the outcome of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and embryo transfer.

BACKGROUD: To investigate the effect of Luteinizing hormone (LH) level changes on the outcomes of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and embryo transfer (ET) in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol. METHODS: A total of 721 patients undergoing GnRH-ant protocol COH for the first IVF/ICSI cycles were retrospectively analyzed. COH process were divided into 2 stages, before (stage 1) and after (stage 2) the GnRH-ant initiation, and each with 5 groups basing on LH levels: LH decreased more than 50% (groups A1, A2), decreased 25-50% (groups B1, B2), change less than 25% (groups C1, C2), increased 25-50% (groups D1, D2), and increased more than 50% (groups E1, E2). RESULTS: There were no significant differences among groups of stage1 regarding COH and ET outcomes. For stage 2, the more obvious the decrease of LH level, the more the number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes, embryos cleavaged and the numbers of embryo available (P < 0.05), but without significant differences regarding ET outcomes. We also found the freeze-all rate in Group A2 was higher (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: LH level changes before GnRH-ant addition were not related to COH and ET outcomes. LH level changes after the addition of GnRH-ant were related to the outcome of COH, and no significant differences were found relating to ET outcomes.

Effects of increasing serum luteinizing hormone levels during early phase of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol on clinical outcomes of the in vitro fertilization cycle.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of changes in serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels in the early stages of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-A) protocol on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer/intracytoplasmic sperm injection clinical outcomes. METHODS: Data from 2116 fresh embryo transfer cycles with the GnRH-A protocol were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups, ΔLH-increased and ΔLH-decreased, according to changes in serum LH levels on the day of GnRH-A addition compared with that on the start day of ovarian stimulation. Patients in whom ΔLH increased were categorized according to early-onset LH increases (serum LH level ≥10 mIU/mL or twice the baseline). RESULTS: ΔLH increased and decreased in 14.9% and 85.1% of patients, respectively. The fertilization rate was lower, and fewer oocytes were retrieved in patients with increased ΔLH compared to those with decreased ΔLH (p < .05). The number of AFC, oocytes retrieved, and AMH in patients with early-onset ΔLH increase was lower between the subgroups (p < .05). There were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy, early abortion, biochemical pregnancy, and live birth rates between the groups and subgroups (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Early increases in LH levels during GnRH-A protocol might affect the number of oocytes retrieved, but not the clinical outcomes.

Cumulative live birth rates between GnRH-agonist long and GnRH-antagonist protocol in one ART cycle when all embryos transferred: real-word data of 18,853 women from China.

BACKGROUND: A consensus has been reached on the preferred primary outcome of all infertility treatment trials, which is the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). Some recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies have compared the effectiveness of GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols but showed inconsistent results. Studies commonly used conservative estimates and optimal estimates to described the CLBR of one incomplete assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle and there are not many previous studies with data of the complete cycle to compare CLBRs in GnRH-antagonist versus GnRH-agonist protocols. METHODS: A total of 18,853 patients have completed their first IVF cycle including fresh and subsequent frozen-thawed cycles during 2016-2019, 16,827 patients were treated with GnRH-a long and 2026 patients with GnRH-ant protocol. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to evaluate the difference of GnRH-a and GnRH-ant protocol in relation to CLBR. Utilized Propensity Score Matching(PSM) for sampling by up to 1:1 nearest neighbor matching to adjust the numerical difference and balance the confounders between groups. RESULTS: Before PSM, significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics and the CLBR was 50.91% in the GnRH-a and 33.42% in the GnRH-ant (OR = 2.07; 95%CI: 1.88-2.28; P < 0.001). Stratified analysis showed the CLBR of GnRH-ant was lower than GnRH-a in suboptimal responders(46.89 vs 27.42%, OR = 2.34, 95%CI = 1.99-2.74; P < 0.001) and no differences of CLBR were observed in other patients between protocols. After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariable logistic analysis found the CLBR of GnRH-ant group was lower than that of GnRH-a group (OR = 2.11, 95%CI:1.69-2.63, P < 0.001). After PSM balenced the confounders between groups, the CLBR of GnRH-a group was higher than that of GnRH-ant group in suboptimal responders((38.61 vs 28.22%, OR = 1.60, 95%CI = 1.28-1.99; P < 0.001) and the normal fertilization rate and number of available embryo in GnRH-a were higher than these of GnRH-ant groups in suboptimal responders (77.39 vs 75.22%; 2.86 ± 1.26 vs 2.61 ± 1.22; P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in other patients between different protocols. CONCLUSIONS: It is crucial to optimize the utilization of protocols in different ovarian response patients and reconsider the field of application of GnRH-ant protocols in China.

Gonadotropin levels at the start of ovarian stimulation predict normal fertilization after hCG re-trigger in GnRH antagonist cycles.

PURPOSE: To assess the appropriateness of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) re-trigger in poor responders to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles. METHODS: The 2251 cycles in 2251 patients triggered with GnRHa for oocyte stimulation, with or without requiring hCG re-trigger between 2013 and 2018, were retrospectively analyzed to compare gonadotropin levels at the start of COS and the rate of normal fertilization between the re-trigger and non-re-trigger group. Furthermore, patients in the re-trigger group were stratified by the rate of normal fertilization (good: ≥60% or poor: <60%) to compare patient demographics, hormone profiles, and clinical outcome between the subgroups. RESULTS: In the re-trigger group, FSH and LH levels at the start of COS were significantly lower in the good fertilization group than in the poor fertilization group (P < .01). Receiver operating characteristic curves identified cutoff values of the FSH and LH levels of 1.30 and 0.35 mIU/mL, respectively, for predicting ≥60% normal fertilization. CONCLUSION: Gonadotropin levels at the start of COS are predictors of response to GnRHa trigger and hCG re-trigger necessity, and may serve as indicators to help clinicians appropriately choose hCG re-trigger rather than abandoning the cycles or continuing the first oocyte aspiration attempt.

Effect of progesterone/estradiol ratio on pregnancy outcome of patients with high trigger-day progesterone levels undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a retrospective cohort study.

This study investigates the predictive power of serum progesterone/estradiol (P/E2) level for estimating the live birth rate in patients who had a serum progesterone (P) rate ≥ 1.5 ng/mL on the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration day and who received the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This retrospective cohort study included 176 cycles. The P/E2 ratio was lower in patients with a live birth (0.73 ± 0.54) than those without a live birth (1.05 ± 1.38), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = .158). According to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the hCG day P/E2 ratio, the area under the curve was 0.579 (95% confidence interval: 0.478 - 0.680, p = .158) for predicting live birth. In conclusion, this study suggests that a P/E2 ratio is not a significant predictor of a live birth rate in the patients with an hCG-day serum progesterone level of ≥1.5 ng/mL undergoing GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles with a fresh embryo transfer. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? As the progesterone (P) levels in the late follicular phase correlate with the estradiol (E2) levels and the increase in mature follicles, earlier studies have proposed the trigger-day progesterone/estradiol (P/E2) ratio as a potential new marker for a premature luteinisation and live birth success. Most of these studies were conducted on long agonist cycles, and found that arbitrarily defined P/E2 ratio of >1 to be associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. What do the results of this study add? This study retrospectively examines the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cycles with a trigger-day serum P value of ≥1.5 ng/mL undergoing the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis did not identify a statistically significant threshold value for the trigger-day P/E2 ratio that was beneficial in predicting a live birth. The P/E2 ratio was also lower in the cycles with a live birth than those without a live birth, although the difference was not statistically significant. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The trigger-day P/E2 ratio does not seem to be an efficient prognostic factor for a live birth in the GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles with a trigger-day serum progesterone level of ≥1.5 ng/mL. Further studies are needed to clarify the association of the trigger-day P/E2 ratio and the pregnancy outcomes in GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles.

The impact of luteinizing hormone supplementation in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: a retrospective cohort study.

The impact of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) supplementation to patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists on cycle outcomes is controversial. Here, we present a retrospective cohort study including cycles from December 2015 to December 2016. Totally 320 cycles were divided into two groups according to with or without exogenous LH supplementation. No significant differences regarding the number of retrieved oocytes, the number of good-quality embryos, and clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups were found. The logistic regression analysis revealed that LH supplementation was not independently associated with clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 0.577, 95% CI: 0.272-1.222, p = .58) or a biochemical pregnancy rate (OR = 0.922, 95% CI: 0.444-1.916, p = .83). When patients were divided into subgroups based on age, more retrieved oocytes (5.60 vs. 3.97, p = .04) and good-quality embryos (3.07 vs. 1.93, p = .01) were achieved in cycles with exogenous LH supplementation for 40 years and over group. We conclude that for aged women (40 years old and over), LH supplementation has a positive impact on the number of retrieved oocytes and good-quality embryos in GnRH antagonist cycles.

Clinical utility of newly developed highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophins: a randomized controlled trial.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IVF-M HP, a newly developed highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin preparation, for ovarian stimulation in women with infertility undergoing IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) and embryo transfer using a GnRH antagonist protocol. This was a multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel design, open-label, non-inferiority clinical study. Of the 112 patients randomized for treatment using the GnRH antagonist protocol, 111 were treated. No significant difference was found in the number of oocytes retrieved from the IVF-M HP and Menopur groups (13.1 ± 7.6 versus 10.3 ± 6.7, respectively). The lower limit of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the difference between the groups was -0.25, i.e., greater than the pre-defined non-inferiority margin (-5). Therefore, the IVF-M HP treatment was considered non-inferior to Menopur. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between the groups in the number of good-quality oocytes, leading follicles, good-quality embryos, or in fertilization, implantation, positive beta-HCG and clinical pregnancy rates. The safety analysis revealed that 40.4% and 35.2% in the IVF-M HP and Menopur groups, respectively, reported adverse events. In conclusion, IVF-M HP had comparable clinical efficacy and safety profiles to Menopur.

Live Birth Outcomes for PCOS Patients Under the Follicular-Phase Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Protocol or Antagonist Protocol - A Retrospective Chinese Cohort.

Objective: For patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET), there has been no consensus regarding which protocol is the most optimal for live birth rate in fresh cycles. We sought to evaluate depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in IVF outcomes for PCOS patients in a single fertility center. Methods: In this retrospective cohort, PCOS patients who visited the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University reproductive center between February 2012 and December 2019 were screened, and 533 PCOS infertility patients were included undergoing their first IVF cycle, with 470 in the depot GnRH agonist group and 63 in the GnRH antagonist group. The primary of this study outcome was the fresh live birth rate (LBR). Results: PCOS women in the depot GnRH agonist group had a higher LBR (49.79%) than those in the GnRH antagonist group (34.92%, p = 0.027). The multivariable logistic regression also confirmed that women in the depot GnRH agonist group had a higher LBR than those in the GnRH antagonist group (OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.05~3.18, p = 0.032). After propensity score matching (PSM), the LBR in the depot GnRH agonist group was higher (50.32%) than that of the GnRH antagonist group (35.48%), p = 0.033. The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rates were similar between the two groups, with 35 in the depot GnRH group and 6 in the GnRH antagonist group (p = 0.561). Conclusions: For PCOS patients in fresh embryo transfer cycles, the depot GnRH agonist protocol may lead to a higher LBR than the antagonist protocol with satisfied lower OHSS rates.

A reappraisal of ovarian stimulation strategies used in assisted reproductive technology.

Ovarian stimulation is a fundamental step in assisted reproductive technology (ART) with the intention of inducing ovarian follicle development prior to timed intercourse or intra-uterine insemination and facilitating the retrieval of multiple oocytes during a single in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. The basis of ovarian stimulation includes the administration of exogenous gonadotropins, with or without pre-treatment with oral hormonal therapy. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist is given in addition to the gonadotropins to prevent a premature rise of endogenous luteinizing hormone that would in turn lead to premature ovulation. With the advancement in technology, various stimulation protocols have been devised to cater for different patient needs. However, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and its serious complications may occur following ovarian stimulation. It is also evident that suboptimal ovarian stimulation strategies may have a negative impact on oogenesis, embryo quality, endometrial receptivity, and reproductive outcomes over recent years. This review describes the various forms of pre-treatment for ovarian stimulation and stimulation protocols, and aims to provide clinicians with the latest available evidence.

[Timing of HMG supplementation and clinical outcomes of advanced-age patients with diminished ovarian reserve receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect and timing of human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) supplementation in advancedage patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol. OBJECTIVE: A total of 682 patients with DOR aged over 35 years undergoing IVF-ET treatment were included in this study. All the patients underwent a GnRH antagonist protocol, and controlled ovarian stimulation was initiated on day 2-3 of the menstrual cycle with follicle stimulation hormone (FSH). According to the timing of HMG supplementation, the patients were divided into no supplementation group (n=371) without HMG supplementation; early supplementation group (n=139), in which daily HMG supplementation started on the first day till the trigger day; and late supplementation group (n=172), in which HMG supplementation started when the leading follicle reached 10-14 mm in diameter and lasted until the trigger day. The pregnancy outcomes of the patients were compared among the 3 groups. OBJECTIVE: The 3 groups showed no significant difference in hCG trigger day E2 and P levels, endometrial thickness, or the number of follicles with comparable fertilization rate and cleavage rate (P>0.05). Gn dose used was the lowest in no supplementation group, and the average number of oocytes retrieved was significantly smaller in early supplementation group than in late supplementation group (P < 0.05). The mean number of mature oocytes and embryos available were significantly higher in late supplementation group than in early supplementation group (P < 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate of fresh embryo transfer cycle was significantly higher in late supplementation group than in no supplementation group (27.7% vs 45.1%, P < 0.05), but the implantation rate, early miscarriage rate, heterotopic pregnancy rate and live birth rate were comparable among the 3 groups (P>0.05). No significant differences were found among the 3 groups in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, heterotopic pregnancy rate or live birth rate of the first frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle with a freeze-all strategy (P>0.05). OBJECTIVE: HMG supplementation in the middle and late follicular phase can improve the outcomes of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and increase the clinical pregnancy rate of fresh embryo transfer cycle in advanced-age patients with DOR undergoing GnRH antagonist protocol.

Effects of multicycle gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocols on oxidative stress of follicular fluid and ovarian granulosa cells.

The effect of repeated multicycle gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols on oxidative stress (OS) in follicular fluid (FF) and ovarian granulosa cells (GCs) remains unclear. This study investigated the effects of repeated multicycle GnRH-ant protocols on OS markers of FF and ovarian GCs. A total of 145 patients were enrolled and divided into four groups: 1 cycle group (n = 42), 2 cycles group (n = 37), 3 cycles group (n = 45), and 4-5 cycles group (n = 21). The FF and ovarian GCs of the patients were collected on the day of last oocyte retrieval and the levels of 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) were tested by ELISA. The results showed that the serum estradiol levels on hCG injection day in the 3 and 4-5 cycles were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than in the 1 and 2 cycles. The number of retrieved oocytes (12.1 ± 3.3 in cycle 1, 11.7 ± 3.1 in cycle 2, 10.4 ± 2.4 in cycle 3, and 9.4 ± 2.4 in cycles 4-5), embryos with two pronuclei (7.6 ± 3.0 in cycle 1, 7.0 ± 2.5 in cycle 2, 6.2 ± 2.6 in cycle 3, and 5.5 ± 2.1 in cycles 4-5), and the rates of high-quality embryos (52.2% in cycle 1, 47.9% in cycle 2, 38.6% in cycle 3, and 36.5% in cycles 4-5), implantation (35.4% in cycle 1, 32.4% in cycle 2, 23.8% in cycle 3, and 22.9% in cycles 4-5) and clinical pregnancy (50.0% in cycle 1, 43.2% in cycle 2, 33.3% in cycle 3, and 23.8% in cycles 4-5) in cycles 3 and 4-5 were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than those in cycles 1 and 2. Compared with 1 and 2 cycles, the 8-OHdG and SOD were significantly increased in the 3-5 cycles, while the CAT and GSH-Px levels were significantly decreased. Together, this study reveals repeated COS with the use of GnRH-ant protocols results in OS and changes the follicle microenvironment of FF and GCs, possibly leading to poor IVF outcomes in patients with 3-5 cycles of COS.

Progesterone protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization treatments with frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Exogenous progestational agents have recently been introduced as an alternative pituitary modulator for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges during in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments. There is increasing evidence that frozen-embryo transfer (FET) is associated with a lower risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Herein, we compared the clinical outcomes of the progesterone protocol with the gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol in PCOS patients with a ''freeze-all'' strategy. METHODS: In this prospective single-central randomized controlled trial, a total of 120 PCOS patients undergoing their first IVF/ICSI treatment were randomly assigned to receive the progesterone protocol (study group) or GnRH-ant protocol (control group). The main outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of premature LH rise/surge, the number of viable embryos, and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: The number of retrieved oocytes (14.65±7.64 versus 12.8±8.57) and viable embryos (5.38±3.54 versus 5.03±3.92) in the study group were comparable to those in the control group (P>0.05). Similarly, no between-group differences were found in the number of mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes, cleaved embryos, and the viable embryo rate per oocyte retrieved (P>0.05). However, the oocyte retrieval rate (66.02%±19.63% versus 54.38%±26.39%) and fertilization rate (78.12%±18.41% versus 62.76%±23.32%) in the study group were significantly more than that in the control group (P<0.05). The mean serum LH value on day 6-7 was lower in the study group than that in the control group (7.47±0.97 versus 3.98±0.52 IU/L, P<0.05), and the incidence of premature LH rise was higher in the study group than in the control group, although no patients experienced premature LH surge. The clinical pregnancy rate [58.82% vs. 57.32%, RR 0.94 (95% CI: 0.508, 1.738), P>0.05] and implantation rate [43.21% vs. 41.4%, RR 0.929 (95% CI: 0.595, 1.448), P>0.05] were also similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The progesterone protocol is comparable with the GnRH-ant protocol regarding oocyte/embryo yields and the probability of clinical pregnancy in PCOS patients, but the two regimens were distinct in the regulation of pituitary LH secretion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR-IOR-15006633.

Fixed Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol Versus Flexible Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Patients With Asynchronous Follicular Development During Controlled Ovulation Stimulation: A Retrospective Study.

Protocols utilizing gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have emerged as mainstream procedures for ovarian stimulation; however, GnRH increases the risk for periodic cancellation of embryos. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the pregnancy outcomes of a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol and a flexible progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (fPPOS) protocol in patients with asynchronous follicular development during controlled ovulation stimulation and to explore the feasibility of converting patients undergoing a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol to an fPPOS protocol. This was the first retrospective study exploring the fPPOS protocol in patients with asynchronous follicular development, and it was conducted in a public reproductive medicine center from January to December 2020. We included infertile women. All participants were scheduled to undergo administration of a GnRH antagonist on the fifth day of controlled ovulation stimulation. The study group included 129 women who were converted from the fixed GnRH antagonist protocol to the fPPOS protocol for their asynchronous follicular development, while the antagonist group consisted of 258 women (ratio 1:2) who proceeded with a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol. On the second or third day of the menstrual period, 100-300 IU/day gonadotropin injections were administered. For patients who were converted to the fPPOS protocol, medroxyprogesterone acetate tablets at 10 mg/day were started on the fifth day of stimulation or when only one leading follicle reached 14 mm and the other follicles were ≤10 mm in diameter, whichever came first. The rates of embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy, and early pregnancy loss were obtained. The number of oocytes retrieved and the number of high-quality embryos in the antagonist group were significantly higher than those in the fPPOS group (P = 0.039 and P = 0.025, respectively). No significant differences in the rates of embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy, and early pregnancy loss were observed between the two groups. Our study found that in patients who were scheduled for administration of GnRH antagonists but presented with asynchronous follicular development on the fifth stimulation day, it was feasible to switch to the fPPOS protocol.

Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Gene and Regulator of G-protein Signaling 2 Gene Expression Level and Association with Oocyte Maturity in In vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycle.

AIMS: The aim is to study the relation and distribution in gene expression level of the luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) gene and regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2) gene expression with oocyte maturation. SETTING AND DESIGN: This cross-sectional study was undertaken in an instruction-based tertiary care infertility unit, department of obstetrics and gynecology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, cumulus granulosa cells (CCs) from 59 oocytes among 18 women being treated by in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle technique from November 2015 to January 2016 were collected on the day of oocyte retrieval. Total RNA was extracted and converted to cDNA in individual oocytes. LHR and RGS2 gene levels were measured and analyzed using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Gene expression level was analyzed using software STATA, version 14.0 (College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, USA). RESULTS: CCs were obtained from 59 cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC), 46 COC from metaphase II (CCMII), 13 COC from metaphase I, and GV oocyte (CCMI + GV). The RGS2 gene expression level, when compared with the housekeeping gene in CCMII and CCMI + GV, was 0.15 (0.05-0.52) and 0.08 (0.02-0.27), respectively. The LHR gene expression when compared with the housekeeping gene in CCMII and CCMI + GV did not differ and was quite in the same value that was 0.02 (0.00-0.11) and 0.02 (0.00-0.06), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that LHR gene expression did not differ in between oocyte groups. Even though the median of RGS2 gene expression was more in the mature oocyte group, the result was inconclusive due to scattering and overlapping of gene expression data between oocyte groups.