RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab is commonly used for the management of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy-associated cytokine release syndrome (CRS). However, it remains unknown whether tocilizumab or its dosage affects the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy. The objective of this multicenter retrospective study was to explore the impact of tocilizumab on CAR T-cell therapy. METHODS: In total, 93 patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) receiving humanized anti-CD19 CAR T cells were recruited from May 2016 to November 2022. Forty-five patients received tocilizumab (tocilizumab group), whereas 48 patients did not (nontocilizumab group). Thirteen patients received >1 dose of tocilizumab. The primary end point was the effect of tocilizumab on the efficacy and safety of CAR T cells. Additionally, proliferation, killing, and cytokine assays of CAR T cells were performed in vitro in the presence of tocilizumab. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 33 years, with 47 males and 46 females. Patients in the tocilizumab group showed similar complete response (CR) rate, overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS) compared with the nontocilizumab group. Compared with patients who received ≤1 dose of tocilizumab, receiving >1 dose of tocilizumab did not affect their CR rate, OS, or EFS. In the tocilizumab group, all patients experienced CRS and 26.7% experienced immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). In the nontocilizumab group, 64.6% of patients experienced CRS and 8.3% experienced ICANS. Up to 75% of ICANS and 87.5% of grade ≥3 ICANS occurred in the tocilizumab group. In vitro, tocilizumab did not impair the proliferation and killing effects of CAR T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab does not affect the efficacy of CAR T cells but may increase the likelihood of ICANS.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antígenos CD19 , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Adulto , Antígenos CD19/inmunología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/etiología , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , Niño , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/inmunología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy targeting CLL1 has been considered a potent weapon for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of CLL1 CAR-T cell therapy in a larger cohort, with particular attention to cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Among the 32 patients assessed for efficacy, complete remission occurred in 71.88% (23/32) of cases and undetectable minimal residual disease in 14 patients. The CRS developed in all patients, with 8 individuals experiencing ICANS. Severe CRS and ICANS were observed in 11 and 2 patients, respectively. Furthermore, the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) and its derivatives measured before and after CLL1 CAR-T cell infusion were employed for predicting the severe complications. Significant differences were observed in EASIX scores on the day before lymphodepletion (Day BL, P = 0.023), -1 (P < 0.001), +1 (P < 0.001), and +3(P = 0.014); sEASIX scores on Day BL (P = 0.007), -1 (P < 0.001), +1 (P < 0.001), and +3 (P < 0.001); and mEASIX score on Day -1 (P = 0.004) between patients with mild and severe CRS/ICANS. Additionally, there was a significant difference in mEASIX scores between responders and non-responders on Day BL (P = 0.004) and Day -1 (P = 0.044). Our findings indicate that pre- and post-infusion assessments of EASIX/mEASIX/sEASIX scores serve as reliable prognostic indicators for severe CRS/ICANS and treatment response following CLL1 CAR-T cell therapy, which can assist physicians in implementing preemptive treatment strategies for potential severe complications and screening patients who are suitable candidates for CLL1 CAR-T cell therapy. EASIX/mEASIX/sEASIX scores serve as reliable prognostic indicators for severe CRS/ICANS following CLL1 CAR-T cell therapy. The preinfusion mEASIX scores of CLL1 CAR-T cells can effectively predict treatment response.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y TejidosRESUMEN
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has become a commercially available treatment option for relapsed or refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with two or more lines of prior therapies, and recently for high-risk r/r DLBCL with one prior line of therapy. The successful development of CAR T-cell therapy for multiple relapsed DLBCL has led to a boom in subsequent trials that investigated its utility in patients with other r/r B-cell lymphoma subtypes. However, CAR T-cell therapy is a multistep process that includes leukapheresis and manipulation which take several weeks. Therefore, patients with rapidly progressing or bulky disease may not be able to complete the therapeutic regimen involving CAR T-cell products. This raises the question of the generalizability of the results of pivotal studies to the entire population. In this review, we summarize the development of CAR-T cell therapy for B-cell lymphoma and discuss strategies to further improve the clinical outcomes of this treatment.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/genética , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/terapia , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos , Antígenos CD19 , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/genéticaRESUMEN
Immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a significant toxicity occurring with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, with first-line treatment options including supportive care and systemic corticosteroids. Sparse data exist on how to approach progressive/refractory cases of ICANS. We present five pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who had progressively worsening ICANS despite systemic steroids, and received intrathecal hydrocortisone with rapid reversal of ICANS. Therapeutic lumbar punctures are routinely used in upfront ALL therapy in pediatrics, with a demonstrable safety profile, thus use of intrathecal hydrocortisone merits further prospective studies in patients with severe ICANS.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad , Linfocitos T , Humanos , Niño , Adulto Joven , Hidrocortisona/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Linfocitos , Inmunoterapia AdoptivaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, emerging as an efficient treatment option for patients with secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, is frequently complicated with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 64-year-old woman with transformed follicular lymphoma, developing high-grade ICANS with eosinophilic pleocytosis following third-line therapy with CAR-T cells (tisagenlecleucel). During bridging therapy, she declined neurologically and was diagnosed with secondary CNS lymphoma. She received methotrexate-cytarabine-thiotepa-rituximab regimen with clinical and radiological improvement. Post-CAR-T cell infusion she developed cytokine release syndrome grade II and ICANS grade III. Given the lack of response to steroids, anakinra was initiated with complete ICANS resolution. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, performed only on day +10 due to thrombocytopenia, revealed eosinophils, while infections were excluded. CONCLUSION: This report emphasizes the importance of CSF analysis in individuals with CAR-T-related neurotoxicity for elucidating the role of specific immune cells in such complications.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Teclistamab, a bispecific T-cell engaging antibody targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), is indicated for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after at least four lines of therapy. It has boxed warnings for life threatening cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). To mitigate these risks, teclistamab is initiated using step-up doses. This article examines safety event rates following the implementation of a 2-day separation between step-up doses at one institution to streamline patient care. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study encompassing all patients who received teclistamab within a 1-year period. The primary endpoint was the overall incidence of CRS and ICANS. Secondary endpoints included hospital length of stay, hematological toxicities, infection rates, among other adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were included in the analysis and stratified into accelerated (days 1,3,5) or standard (days 1,4,7) dosing groups. CRS occurred in 48% (11) of patients for the accelerated dosing and 50% (2) for the standard dosing group. ICANS was seen in 17% (4) of patients in the accelerated dosing group and none in the standard dosing group. Average length of stay in the accelerated dose was 7.6 days versus 9.2 days in the standard dose group. CONCLUSION: Accelerated dose escalation of teclistamab yielded safety event rates comparable to those in the literature. These findings may support outpatient administration for teclistamab. Accelerated dose escalation strategy allowed for the optimization of hospitalization and resources.
RESUMEN
We herein report a 58-year-old female patient undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Following the CAR-T infusion, the patient experienced Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS), which was subsequently remitted. However, aphasia was observed five days post-infusion, and a loss of consciousness occurred on the sixth day. Brain MRI revealed a possibly high signal intensity in the mesial temporal region. The patient was diagnosed with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) secondary to CRS and received treatment with dexamethasone, which promptly improved her consciousness. As the diagnosis of ICANS was confirmed following the emergence of aphasia, vigilant cognitive monitoring of cognitive function is crucial in patients following CAR-T therapy.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite remarkable therapeutic advances over the last two decades, which have resulted in dramatic improvements in patient survival, multiple myeloma (MM) is still considered an incurable disease. Therefore, there is a high need for new treatment strategies. Genetically engineered/redirected chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells may represent the most compelling modality of immunotherapy for cancer treatment in general, and MM in particular. Indeed, unprecedented response rates have led to the recent approvals of the first two BCMA-targeted CAR T cell products idecabtagene-vicleucel ('Ide-cel') and ciltacabtagene-autoleucel ('Cilta-Cel') for the treatment of heavily pretreated MM patients. In addition, both are emerging as a new standard-of-care also in earlier lines of therapy. AREAS COVERED: This article briefly reviews the history of the preclinical development of CAR T cells, with a particular focus on Cilta-cel. Moreover, it summarizes the newest clinical data on Cilta-cel and discusses strategies to further improve its activity and reduce its toxicity. EXPERT OPINION: Modern next-generation immunotherapy is continuously transforming the MM treatment landscape. Despite several caveats of CAR T cell therapy, including its toxicity, costs, and limited access, prolonged disease-free survival and potential cure of MM are finally within reach.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have revolutionized the treatment of multiple hematologic malignancies. Engineered cellular therapies now offer similar hope to transform the management of solid tumors and autoimmune diseases. However, toxicities can be serious and often require hospitalization. AREAS COVERED: We review the two chief toxicities of CAR T therapy, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and the rarer immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome. We discuss treatment paradigms and promising future pharmacologic strategies. Literature and therapies reviewed were identified by PubMed search, cited references therein, and review of registered trials. EXPERT OPINION: Management of CRS and ICANS has improved, aided by consensus definitions and guidelines that facilitate recognition and timely intervention. Further data will define optimal timing of tocilizumab and corticosteroids, current foundations of management. Pathophysiologic understanding has inspired off-label use of IL-1 receptor antagonism, IFNγ and IL-6 neutralizing antibodies, and janus kinase inhibitors, with data emerging from ongoing clinical trials. Further strategies to reduce toxicities include novel pharmacologic targets and safety features engineered into CAR T cells themselves. As these potentially curative therapies are used earlier in oncologic therapy and even in non-oncologic indications, effective accessible strategies to manage toxicities are critical.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/etiología , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/inmunología , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/terapia , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica/inmunología , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica/terapia , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/etiología , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/inmunología , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , AnimalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is common after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of preinfusion electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities and EEG findings at ICANS onset for predicting ICANS risk and severity in 56 adult patients with refractory lymphoma undergoing CAR-T therapy. STUDY DESIGN: EEGs were conducted at the time of lymphodepleting chemotherapy and shortly after onset of ICANS. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (50%) patients developed ICANS at a median time of 6 days after CAR-T infusion. Abnormal preinfusion EEG was identified as a risk factor for severe ICANS (50% vs. 17%, P = 0.036). Following ICANS onset, EEG abnormalities were detected in 89% of patients [encephalopathy (n = 19, 70%) and/or interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) (n = 14, 52%)]. Importantly, IEDs seemed to be associated with rapid progression to higher grades of ICANS within 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: If confirmed in a large cohort of patients, these findings could establish the basis for modifying current management guidelines, enabling the identification of patients at risk of neurotoxicity, and providing support for preemptive corticosteroid use in patients with both initial grade 1 ICANS and IEDs at neurotoxicity onset, who are at risk of neurological impairment.
Asunto(s)
Electroencefalografía , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/fisiopatología , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/etiología , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/diagnóstico , Adulto , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Anciano , Linfoma/terapia , Linfoma/fisiopatología , Linfoma/inmunología , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were among the groups impacted more severely by the COVID-19 pandemic, with higher rates of severe disease and COVID-19-related mortality. MM and COVID-19, plus post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, are associated with endothelial dysfunction and injury, with overlapping inflammatory pathways and coagulopathies. Existing treatment options for MM, notably high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation and novel chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies and bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies, are also associated with endothelial cell injury and mechanism-related toxicities. These pathologies include cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity that may be exacerbated by underlying endotheliopathies. In the context of these overlapping risks, prophylaxis and treatment approaches mitigating the inflammatory and pro-coagulant effects of endothelial injury are important considerations for patient management, including cytokine receptor antagonists, thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin and direct oral anticoagulants, and direct endothelial protection with defibrotide in the appropriate clinical settings.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Mieloma Múltiple , Polidesoxirribonucleótidos , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunología , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/inmunología , Polidesoxirribonucleótidos/uso terapéutico , Polidesoxirribonucleótidos/farmacología , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/etiología , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/terapia , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/prevención & control , Endotelio Vascular/efectos de los fármacos , Endotelio Vascular/metabolismo , Endotelio Vascular/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy holds enormous potential for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Despite its benefits, it is still used as a second line of therapy, mainly because of its severe side effects and patient unresponsiveness. Numerous researchers worldwide have attempted to identify effective predictive biomarkers for early prediction of treatment outcomes and adverse effects in CAR T cell therapy, albeit so far only with limited success. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of predictive biomarkers. Although existing predictive metrics correlate to some extent with treatment outcomes, they fail to encapsulate the complexity of the immune system dynamics. The aim of this review is to identify six major groups of predictive biomarkers and propose their use in developing improved and efficient prediction models. These groups include changes in mitochondrial dynamics, endothelial activation, central nervous system impairment, immune system markers, extracellular vesicles, and the inhibitory tumor microenvironment. A comprehensive understanding of the multiple factors that influence therapeutic efficacy has the potential to significantly improve the course of CAR T cell therapy and patient care, thereby making this advanced immunotherapy more appealing and the course of therapy more convenient and favorable for patients.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia , Linfocitos T , Biomarcadores/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is increasingly used in patients with refractory haematological malignancies but can induce severe adverse events. We aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after CAR-T therapy. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study included consecutive adults admitted to either of two French ICUs in 2018-2022 within 3 months after CAR-T therapy. RESULTS: Among 238 patients given CAR-T therapy, 84 (35.3%) required ICU admission and were included in the study, a median of 5 [0-7] days after CAR-T infusion. Median SOFA and SAPSII scores were 3 [2-6] and 39 [30-48], respectively. Criteria for cytokine release syndrome were met in 80/84 (95.2%) patients, including 18/80 (22.5%) with grade 3-4 toxicity. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 46/84 (54.8%) patients, including 29/46 (63%) with grade 3-4 toxicity. Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis was diagnosed in 15/84 (17.9%) patients. Tocilizumab was used in 73/84 (86.9%) patients, with a median of 2 [1-4] doses. Steroids were given to 55/84 (65.5%) patients, including 21/55 (38.2%) given high-dose pulse therapy. Overall, 23/84 (27.4%) patients had bacterial infections, 3/84 (3.6%) had fungal infections (1 invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and 2 Mucorales), and 2 (2.4%) had cytomegalovirus infection. Vasopressors were required in 23/84 (27.4%), invasive mechanical ventilation in 12/84 (14.3%), and dialysis in 4/84 (4.8%) patients. Four patients died in the ICU (including 2 after ICU readmission, i.e., overall mortality was 4.8% of patients). One year after CAR-T therapy, 41/84 (48.9%) patients were alive and in complete remission, 14/84 (16.7%) were alive and in relapse, and 29/84 (34.5%) had died. These outcomes were similar to those of patients never admitted to the ICU. CONCLUSION: ICU admission is common after CAR-T therapy and is usually performed to manage specific toxicities. Our experience is encouraging, with low ICU mortality despite a high rate of grade 3-4 toxicities, and half of patients being alive and in complete remission at one year.
RESUMEN
Variability or stability might have an impact on treatment success and toxicity of CD19 CAR T-cells. We conducted a prospective observational study of 12 patients treated with Tisagenlecleucel for CD19+ B-cell malignancies. Using a 31-color spectral flow cytometry panel, we analyzed differentiation stages and exhaustion markers of CAR T-cell subsets prior to CAR T-cell infusion and longitudinally during 6 months of follow-up. The majority of activation markers on CAR T-cells showed stable expression patterns over time and were not associated with response to therapy or toxicity. Unsupervised cluster analysis revealed an immune signature of CAR T-cell products associated with the development of immune cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Warranting validation in an independent patient cohort, in-depth phenotyping of CAR T-cell products as well as longitudinal monitoring post cell transfer might become a valuable tool to increase efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales , Inmunofenotipificación , Humanos , Antígenos CD19 , Linfocitos T , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Bendamustine has been retrospectively shown to be an effective and safe lymphodepletion regimen prior to the anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) products tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel, as well as the anti-BCMA CART products idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel. However, bendamustine as lymphodepletion prior to lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), a 4-1BB co-stimulated, fixed CD4:CD8 ratio anti-CD19 CART product, has not been described yet. Thus, we studied a cohort of sequentially-treated patients with large B-cell lymphomas who received bendamustine lymphodepletion before liso-cel at the University of Pennsylvania between 5/2021 and 12/2023 (n = 31). Patients were evaluated for toxicities and responses. Of note, 7 patients (22.6%) would have dnot met the inclusion criteria for the registrational liso-cel clinical trials, mostly due to older age. Overall and complete response rates were 76.9% and 73.1%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 6.3 months, the 6-month progression-free and overall survival were 59.9% and 91.1%, respectively. Rates of cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity (ICANS) of any grade were 9.7% and 9.7%, respectively, with no grade ≥ 3 events. No infections were reported during the first 30 days following liso-cel infusion. Neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed in 29.0% of patients; thrombocytopenia ≥ grade 3 occurred in 9.7%. In conclusion, bendamustine lymphodepletion before liso-cel appears to be a strategy that can drive tumor responses while ensuring a mild toxicity profile.
Asunto(s)
Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Humanos , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efectos adversos , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has become a powerful treatment option in B-cell and plasma cell malignancies, and many patients have benefited from its use. To date, six CAR T-cell products have been approved by the FDA and EMA, and many more are being developed and investigated in clinical trials. The whole field of adoptive cell transfer has experienced an unbelievable development process, and we are now at the edge of a new era of immune therapies that will have its impact beyond hematologic malignancies. Areas of interest are, e.g., solid oncology, autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases, and others. Although much has been achieved so far, there is still a huge effort needed to overcome significant challenges and difficulties. We are witnessing a rapid expansion of knowledge, induced by new biomedical technologies and CAR designs. The era of CAR T-cell therapy has just begun, and new products will widen the therapeutic landscape in the future. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical applications of CAR T-cells, focusing on the approved products and emphasizing their benefits but also indicating limitations and challenges.
RESUMEN
T-cell engagers (TCE) are cancer immunotherapies that have recently demonstrated meaningful benefit for patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors. The anticipated widespread use of T cell engagers poses implementation challenges and highlights the need for guidance to anticipate, mitigate, and manage adverse events. By mobilizing T-cells directly at the contact of tumor cells, TCE mount an obligatory and immediate anti-tumor immune response that could result in diverse reactions and adverse events. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most common reaction and is largely confined to the first drug administrations during step-up dosage. Cytokine release syndrome should be distinguished from infusion related reaction by clinical symptoms, timing to occurrence, pathophysiological aspects, and clinical management. Other common reactions and adverse events with TCE are immune effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), infections, tumor flare reaction and cytopenias. The toxicity profiles of TCE and CAR-T cells have commonalities and distinctions that we sum-up in this review. As compared with CAR-T cells, TCE are responsible for less frequently severe CRS or ICANS. This review recapitulates terminology, pathophysiology, severity grading system and management of reactions and adverse events related to TCE.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Neoplasias , Linfocitos T , Humanos , Neoplasias/inmunología , Neoplasias/terapia , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/etiología , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/inmunología , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have dramatically improved treatment outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Despite unprecedented efficacy, treatment with CAR T cell therapies can cause a multitude of adverse effects which require monitoring and management at specialized centers and contribute to morbidity and non-relapse mortality. Such toxicities include cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, neurotoxicity distinct from ICANS, immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome, and immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity that can lead to prolonged cytopenias and infectious complications. This review will discuss the current understanding of the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms and provide guidelines for the grading and management of such toxicities.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite advancements in managing autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) with existing treatments, many patients still encounter challenges such as inadequate responses, difficulty in maintaining remission, and side effects. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, originally developed for cancer, has now emerged as a promising option for cases of refractory ARDs. METHODS: A search of the literature was conducted to compose a narrative review exploring the current evidence, potential safety, limitations, potential modifications, and future directions of CAR-T cells in ARDs. RESULTS: CAR-T cell therapy has been administered to patients with refractory ARDs, including systemic lupus erythematosus, antisynthetase syndrome, and systemic sclerosis, demonstrating significant improvement. Notable responses include enhanced clinical symptoms, reduced serum autoantibody titers, and sustained remissions in disease activity. Preclinical and in vitro studies using both animal and human samples also support the efficacy and elaborate on potential mechanisms of CAR-T cells against antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and rheumatoid arthritis. While cautious monitoring of adverse events, such as cytokine release syndrome, is crucial, the therapy appears to be highly tolerable. Nevertheless, challenges persist, including cost, durability due to potential CAR-T cell exhaustion, and manufacturing complexities, urging the development of innovative solutions to further enhance CAR-T cell therapy accessibility in ARDs. CONCLUSIONS: CAR-T cell therapy for refractory ARDs has demonstrated high effectiveness. While no significant warning signs are currently reported, achieving a balance between therapeutic efficacy and safety is vital in adapting CAR-T cell therapy for ARDs. Moreover, there is significant potential for technological advancements to enhance the delivery of this treatment to patients, thereby ensuring safer and more effective disease control for patients.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/terapia , Enfermedades Reumáticas/inmunología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/terapia , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inmunología , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunologíaRESUMEN
T-cell re-directing bispecific antibodies targeting B-cell maturation antigens have recently entered real-world use in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. While no head-to-head comparison has been done, they have generally been observed to have lower-grade toxicities compared with their chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) counterparts. However, in our real-world, single-institution experience, we have encountered two patients receiving teclistamab who experienced high-grade and refractory immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) that did not respond to traditional toxicity mitigation strategies of high-dose corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive therapies. As we increase our use of these novel and vital agents, caution must be warranted.