Changes in microcirculation of small intestine end-to-end anastomoses in an experimental model.

INTRODUCTION: Sufficient perfusion is essential for a safe intestinal anastomosis. Impaired microcirculation may lead to increased bacterial translocation and anastomosis insufficiency. Thus, it is important to estimate well the optimal distance of the anastomosis line from the last mesenterial vessel. However, it is still empiric. In this experiment the aim was to investigate the intestinal microcirculation at various distances from the anastomosis in a pig model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On 8 anesthetized pigs paramedian laparotomy and end-to-end jejuno-jejunostomy were performed. Using Cytocam-IDF camera, microcirculatory recordings were taken before surgery at the planned suture line, and 1 to 3 mesenterial vessel mural trunk distance from it, and at the same sites 15 and 120 min after anastomosis completion. After the microcirculation monitoring, anastomosed and intact bowel segments were removed to test tensile strength. RESULTS: The proportion and the density of the perfused vessels decreased significantly after anastomosis completion. The perfusion rate increased gradually distal from the anastomosis, and after 120 min these values seemed to be normalized. Anastomosed bowels had significantly lower maximal tensile strength and higher slope of tensile strength curves than intact controls. CONCLUSION: Alterations in microcirculation and tensile strength were observed. After completing the anastomosis, the improvement in perfusion increased gradually away from the wound edge. The IDF device was useful to monitor intestinal microcirculation providing data to estimate better the optimal distance of the anastomosis from the last order mesenteric vessel.

Enteral Access Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Cardiac Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients admitted with principal cardiac diagnosis (PCD) can encounter difficult inpatient stays that are often marked by malnutrition. In this setting, enteral feeding may improve nutritional status. This study examined the association of PCD with perioperative outcomes after elective enteral access procedures. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent enteral access procedures between 2018 and 2020 at a tertiary care institution were reviewed retrospectively. Differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without PCD were adjusted using entropy balancing. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were subsequently developed to evaluate the association between PCD and nutritional outcomes, perioperative morbidity and mortality, length of stay, and nonelective readmission after enteral access. RESULTS: 912 patients with enteral access met inclusion criteria, of whom 84 (9.2%) had a diagnosis code indicating PCD. Compared to non-PCD, patients with PCD more commonly received percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy by general surgery and had a higher burden of comorbidities as measured by the Charlson comorbidity index. Multivariable risk adjustment generated a strongly balanced distribution of baseline covariates between patient groups (standardized differences ranged from -2.45 × 10-8 to 3.18 × 108). After adjustment, despite no significant association with in-hospital mortality, percentage change prealbumin, length of stay, or readmission, PCD was associated with an approximately 2.25-day reduction in time to meet goal feeds (95% CI -3.76 to -0.74, P = 0.004) as well as decreased odds of reoperation (adjusted odds ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.86, P = 0.026) and acute kidney injury (adjusted odds ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.06-0.91, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Despite having more comorbidities than non-PCD, adult enteral access patients with PCD experienced favorable nutritional and perioperative outcomes.

Critical appraisal of total gastrectomy plus total colectomy with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as a treatment for advanced pseudomyxoma peritonei.

BACKGROUND: The absolute requirement for a long-term favorable result with cytoreductive surgery for pseudomyxoma peritonei is a complete resection of all visible disease. A combination of parietal peritonectomy procedures and visceral resections is required for this to occur. The cytoreductive surgery is supplemented by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. METHODS: We searched our database and secured files for patients who required a total gastrectomy and a total colectomy to achieve a complete cytoreductive surgery. Survival of low-grade mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) and mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma (MACA) histologies were determined. Clinical and histologic variables were assessed for their impact on survival. RESULTS: Thirteen of 450 patients (2.9%) with LAMN histology and 14 of 186 patients (7.5%) with MACA histology had these visceral resections. Median survival of these 27 patients was 10 years. LAMN and MACA patients showed the same survival. For LAMN histology, this requirement for extensive visceral resection markedly reduced survival (p < 0.0001). For MACA, there was no adverse impact on survival (p = 0.4359). Class 4 adverse events caused reduced survival (p = 0.0014). CONCLUSIONS: A 10-year median survival accompanies total gastrectomy plus total colectomy for advanced pseudomyxoma peritonei. Systemic chemotherapy and class 4 adverse events reduced survival.

Top Tips for Direct Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy (DPEJ) Tube Placement.

Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) provides post-pyloric enteral access in patients unable to meet long-term nutritional needs per os in situations where gastric feeding is neither tolerated nor feasible. Specific conditions associated with feeding intolerance due to due to nausea, vomiting, or ileus include gastric outlet obstruction, gastroparesis, or complications of acute or chronic pancreatitis; infeasibility may be due to high aspiration risk or prior gastric surgery. Since performing DPEJ is not an ACGME requirement for GI fellows or early career gastroenterologists, not all trainees are taught this technique. Hence, provider expertise for teaching and performing this technique varies widely across centers. In this article, we provide top tips for successful performance of DPEJ.

Gastric bypass revisional surgery: percentage total body weight loss differences among three different techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Suboptimal weight loss or weight regain may occur after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). For this reason, revisional surgery has gained increasing interest. We aimed to compare the percentage of total body weight loss (%TBWL) at one-year follow-up among three different techniques: Jejuno-jejunostomy distalization (JJD), Sleeve resection of the gastrojejunostomy and gastric pouch (SRGJP), and the combination of both (JJD + SRGJP). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent revisional surgery after RYGB (2020-2021). The cohort was stratified by the type of revisional technique performed. Postoperative bariatric outcomes and nutritional deficiencies were compared among groups. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients underwent revisional surgery after RYGB: JJD was performed in 8 (10.3%), SRGJP in 34 (43.6%), and JJD + SRGJP in 36 (46.1%) patients. The most common indication for surgery was weight regain, in 72 (92.3%) patients. The median lengths of the BP limbs before and after distalization, were 50 cm (IQR 40-75 cm) and 175 cm (IQR 150-200 cm), respectively. The median length of the new common limb (NCL) and total alimentary limb length (TALL) were 277 cm (IQR 250-313 cm) and 400 cm (IQR 375-475 cm), respectively. Median percentage of total body weight loss (%TBWL) at one year was 15% (IQR 15-19%) for JJD, 20% (IQR 13-26%) for SRGJP, and 21% (IQR 15- 28%) for JJD + SRGJP (p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the combined procedure (JJD + SRGJP) exhibited higher %TBWL at one year, however no statistically significant difference was identified among the three techniques.

The impact of jejunostomy feeding on nutritional outcomes after oesophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional status is compromised long-term following oesophagectomy. Controversy surrounds the optimal route for nutrition support postoperatively and there is wide variation in the use of feeding jejunostomy tubes. METHODS: A retrospective service evaluation was conducted for all consecutive adults who underwent oesophagectomy for a cancer diagnosis within a specialist centre between April 2016 and July 2019 (n = 165). Nutritional and clinical outcomes were compared for patients who received jejunostomy feeding (n = 24), versus those who did not (n = 141). RESULTS: Patients with feeding jejunostomy lost significantly less weight at both 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared to those without jejunostomy (p ≤ 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). This remained statistically significant in multiple regression, controlling for age, gender, preoperative tumour staging and adjuvant treatment (p ≤ 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively). Median length of home enteral feeding was 10 weeks after discharge in the jejunostomy group. We observed minor jejunostomy tube-related complications in four patients (16.7%). Of those readmitted within 90 days of surgery in the non-jejunostomy group, nutritional failure was a factor in 43.2% of these readmissions. "Rescue tube feeding" was required by 8.5% of the non-jejunostomy group within the first postoperative year, including 6.4% within 90 days of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Use of short-term supplementary jejunal feeding in addition to oral intake after hospital discharge is beneficial for maintaining weight after oesophagectomy. We suggest a future randomised-controlled trial to confirm these findings.

Outcome of laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy, comparison of a pure laparoscopic technique with Witzel's tunnel to open technique: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive upper GI cancer commonly uses feeding jejunostomy as a standard procedure. Surgeons implemented laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy via minimally invasive surgery, employing a variety of techniques. This study assessed the perioperative results, safety, and costs associated with laparoscopic versus open jejunostomy surgeries. We used only Witzel's tunnel and standard laparoscopic instruments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data from all patients who underwent feeding jejunostomy between January 2016 and June 2018. We recorded pertinent data on baseline, surgical outcomes, postoperative results, complications, and costs. The study excluded patients with jejunostomy as a conversion or an addition. RESULT: We divided the 74 patients into 2 groups: 30 underwent laparoscopy and 44 underwent open surgery. The mean operational times were 89.67 and 91.64 min and showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.678). The mean morphine dosage was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (3.3 vs. 7.19, p = < 0.001). Laparoscopic surgery lowered the median time of feeding initiation, feeding accomplished, and postoperative stay, although none of these reached statistical significance. There were significantly higher surgical expenses in the laparoscopic group (16,410 vs. 11,685 Thai Baht) (p < 0.001); however, median overall expenditures did not significantly differ (105,147 vs. 116,198 Thai Baht) (p = 0.387). Laparoscopic versus open surgery had similar incidences of postoperative complications (20% vs. 25%, p = 0.846). The feeding tube catheter location was infection-free in all patients in our study. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic jejunostomy feeding was safe, and postoperative morphine consumption was lower. Increasing operational costs did not have a significant impact on overall expenditures. Witzel's tunnel may reduce jejunostomy site infections.

Outcomes in Enteral Access Based on Specialty and Approach: A Single-Center Three-Year Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Interventional radiologic, endoscopic, and surgical approaches are commonly utilized to establish durable enteral access in adult patients. The purpose of this study is to examine differences in nutritional outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing enteral access creation. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent enteral access procedures by interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons between 2018 and 2020 at a single institution were reviewed. Included access types were percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), open or laparoscopic gastrostomy, laparoscopic jejunostomy, and percutaneous gastrostomy (perc-G), percutaneous jejunostomy , or primary gastrojejunostomy. RESULTS: 912 patients undergoing enteral access cases met the criteria for inclusion. PEGs and perc-Gs were the most common procedures. PEGs had higher Charlson scores (4.5 [3.0-6.0] versus 2.0 [1.0-2.0], P = 0.007) and lower starting albumin (3.0 [2.6-3.4] versus 3.6 [3.5-3.8] g/dL, P < 0.0001). Time to goal feeds (4 [2-6] vs 4 [3-5] d, P = 0.970), delta prealbumin (3.6 [0-6.5] versus 6.2 [2.3-10] mg/L, P = 0.145), time to access removal (160 [60-220] versus 180 [90-300] d, P = 0.998), and enteral access-related complications (19% versus 16%, P = 0.21) between PEG and perc-G were similar and differences were not statistically significant. A greater percent change in prealbumin was noted for perc-G (10 [-3-20] versus 41.7% [11-65], P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Despite having higher Charlson scores and worse preoperative nutrition, there is a similar incidence of enteral access-related complications, time to goal feeds, delta prealbumin, or time to access removal between PEG and perc-G patients. Our data suggest that access approach should be made on an individual basis, accounting for anatomy and technical feasibility.

Who Places Feeding Tubes and in What Scenario?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Enteral feeding is commonly used to provide patients with nutrition. Access via feeding tubes can be attained by multiple medical specialties through a variety of methods. RECENT FINDINGS: There are limited data available on direct comparisons amongst gastroenterologist, interventional radiologists and surgeons, although there appears to be similar rates of complications. Fluroscopically and surgically placed feeding tubes may have a higher technical success rate than endoscopically placed tubes. The preferred specialty for feeding tube placement varies per institution, often due to logistical matters over technique or concern for complications. Ideally, a multidisciplinary team should exist to determine which approach is best in a patient-specific manner.

Laparoscopic vs. open feeding jejunostomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Feeding jejunostomy is a solid way for patients to maintain enteral nutrition. However, debate over the superiority of the laparoscopic vs. laparotomic method has raised concerns in recent years. This systemic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes between these two approaches. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from the date of inception to April 2022 for studies comparing laparoscopic and open feeding jejunostomy. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted from the included articles. The primary outcome was the relative risk (RR) of postoperative complications in each group. We also analyzed the major/minor complication rates and operations, excluding major concomitant procedures. The risk of bias of included studies were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The certainty of evidence was rated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: A total of seven retrospective studies with 1195 patients in total were included in this systemic review and meta-analysis. Laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy carried a significantly lower postoperative complication rate (RR: 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91, p = 0.02, low certainty of evidence) compared with laparotomy, and the heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 34%, p = 0.18). After excluding major concomitant procedures, the RR between the laparoscopic and open group was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.33-0.70, p < 0.001, low certainty of evidence), suggesting that the laparoscopic approach was superior in terms of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy might reduce the postoperative overall complication rate compared with open feeding jejunostomy.

Evaluation of the educational quality of publicly available online videos on laparoscopic jejunostomy by utilizing the LAP-VEGaS guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Despite its common nature, there is no data on the educational quality of publicly available laparoscopic jejunostomy training videos. The LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool, released in 2020, has been developed to ensure that teaching videos are of appropriate quality. This study applies the LAP-VEGaS tool to currently available laparoscopic jejunostomy videos. METHODS: A retrospective review of YouTube® videos was conducted for "laparoscopic jejunostomy." Included videos were rated by three independent investigators using LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool (0-18). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate differences in LAP-VEGaS scores between video categories and date of publication relative to 2020. Spearman's correlation test was performed to measure association between scores and length, number of views and likes. RESULTS: 27 unique videos met selection criteria. Academic and physician video walkthroughs did not demonstrate a significant difference in median scores (9.33 IQR 6.33, 14.33 vs. 7.67 IQR 4, 12.67, p = 0.3951). Videos published after 2020 demonstrated higher median scores than those published before 2020 (13 IQR 7.5, 14.67 vs. 5 IQR 3, 9.67, p = 0.0081). A majority of videos failed to provide patient position (52%), intraoperative findings (56%), operative time (63%), graphic aids (74%), and audio/written commentary (52%). A positive association was demonstrated between scores and number of likes (rs = 0.59, p = 0.0011) and video length (rs = 0.39, p = 0.0421), but not number of views (rs = 0.17, p = 0.3991). CONCLUSION: The majority of available YouTube® videos on laparoscopic jejunostomy fail to meet the basic educational needs of surgical trainees, and there is no difference between those produced by academic centers or independent physicians. However, there has been improvement in video quality following the release of the scoring tool. Standardization of laparoscopic jejunostomy training videos with the LAP-VEGaS score can ensure that videos are of appropriate educational value with logical structure.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y feeding jejunostomy as a long-term solution for severe feeding problems in children.

Enteral feeding is a common problem in children with gastric emptying disorders. Traditional feeding methods in these patients often show a high rate of complications and maintenance issues. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y feeding jejunostomy (LRFJ) has been described in a few patients as a minimal invasive option for enteral access in these children. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of the LRFJ procedure in our tertiary referral center. We conducted a retrospective case-series including all patients, aged 0-18 years old, that underwent a LFRJ procedure between August 2011 and December 2020 for the indication of oral feeding intolerance due to delayed gastric emptying. Outcomes evaluated were complications (short and long term) and parenteral satisfaction. In total, 12 children were identified that underwent LRFJ for the indication of oral feeding intolerance due to delayed gastric emptying. A total of 16 complications were noted in 8/12 patients (67%). Severity classified by Clavien-Dindo were grade I (n = 13), grade II (n = 1), and grade IIIB (n = 2). In 11/12 patients, parents were satisfied with the results. CONCLUSIONS: Although minor complications after LRFJ are common in our patients, this technique is a safe solution in patients with gastric emptying disorders leading to a definitive method of enteral feeding and high parenteral satisfaction. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Traditional tube feeding in children (duodenal, PEG-J-tubes) with severe delayed gastric emptying can be challenging with a high rate of complications and maintenance issues. • Open loop jejunostomy and Roux-en-Y jejunostomy are alternative, permanent methods of feeding but either invasive or are accompanied by severe complications. Little is known in the literature about laparoscopic Roux-en-Y feeding jejunostomy. WHAT IS NEW: • Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y feeding jejunostomy is a permanent, safe and minimal invasive alternative option for enteral feeding in children with severe delayed gastric emptying..

Clinical management of high-output stoma: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: High output is a common complication after stoma formation. Although the management of high output is described in the literature, there is a lack of consensus on definitions and treatment. Our aim was to review and summarise the current best evidence. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from 1 Jan 2000 to 31 Dec 2021 for relevant articles on adult patients with a high-output stoma. Patients with enteroatmospheric fistulas and case series/reports were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB2 and MINORS. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021226621). RESULTS: The search strategy identified 1095 articles, of which 32 studies with 768 patients met the inclusion criteria. These studies comprised 15 randomised controlled trials, 13 non-randomised prospective trials, and 4 retrospective cohort studies. Eighteen different interventions were assessed. In the meta-analysis, there was no difference in stoma output between controls and somatostatin analogues (g - 1.72, 95% CI - 4.09 to 0.65, p = 0.11, I2 = 88%, t2 = 3.09), loperamide (g - 0.34, 95% CI - 0.69 to 0.01, p = 0.05, I2 = 0%, t2 = 0) and omeprazole (g - 0.31, 95% CI  - 2.46 to 1.84, p = 0.32, I2 = 0%, t2 = 0). Thirteen randomised trials showed high concern of bias, one some concern, and one low concern. The non-randomised/retrospective trials had a median MINORS score of 12 out of 24 (range 7-17). CONCLUSION: There is limited high-quality evidence favouring any specific widely used drug over the others in the management of high-output stoma. Evidence, however, is weak due to inconsistent definitions, risk of bias and poor methodology in the existing studies. We recommend the development of validated core descriptor and outcomes sets, as well as patient-reported outcome measures.

Gall Bladder Duplication with Choledochal Cyst: A Rare Entity.

A 4-year-old male child presented with complaints of abdominal pain and vomiting along with yellowish discoloration of the eyes. Investigations were suggestive of acute pancreatitis and double gall bladder (GB) with dilated common bile duct (CBD) with intraluminal calculi and Type II choledochal cyst. He underwent surgical resection of double GB with dilated CBD with hepatico-docho-jejunostomy. On follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic. Our case highlights the importance of preoperative diagnosis to deal with increased operative difficulty and complications.

[Enteral nutrition in postoperative rehabilitation after reconstructive esophageal and gastric surgery]. / Rol' enteral'nogo pitaniya v reabilitatsii patsientov posle rekonstruktivnykh vmeshatel'stv na pishchevode i zheludke.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate enteral nutrition as a component of postoperative rehabilitation after reconstructive esophageal and gastric surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 217 patients who underwent reconstructive esophageal and gastric surgeries between 2010 and 2020. In the main group (n=121), patients underwent postoperative enhanced recovery program (ERAS). Early enteral feeding including micro-jejunostomy and early oral feeding was essential for postoperative management. The control group included 96 patients who were treated in traditional fashion. The primary endpoint was length of hospital-stay (LOS) and ICU-stay. Restoration of gastrointestinal function (peristalsis, stool, oral nutrition), anastomotic leakage rate and other complications comprised secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Both groups did not differ by sex, age, body mass index, diagnosis and comorbidities. There was significant reduction in postoperative LOS in the ERAS group (14 (12; 15.8) and 9 (6.3; 12) days, p<0.0001). In the same group, we observed less in ICU-stay (4.7 (3.6; 5.6) and to 3.5 (2; 4) days, p<0.001), earlier recovery of peristalsis and X-ray control of anastomosis in patients with and without anastomotic leakage. Incidence of respiratory complications was lower in the ERAS group (p=0.034). Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar. CONCLUSION: Early enteral and oral feeding after esophageal and gastric reconstructive surgery reduces hospital-stay and accelerates postoperative rehabilitation.

Coronary artery stent for securing pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis after PD: The "Huscher technique".

The "Medici effect" is known as the effect that arises when the intersection of interrelated disciplines manifests an enriching link for the involved disciplines in their own identity. To a certain extent, we think that the "Medici Effect" can be applied in any field; more specifically we applied this concept in pancreatic surgery. So, may we borrow coronary stents from cardiology to settle pancreatic-jejunostomy (PJ) issues after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)?

Can we predict the need for nutritional support following pancreatoduodenectomy?

BACKGROUND: The practice of routine placement of a tube jejunostomy at the time of pancreatoduodenectomy has given way to a more selective approach. However, the indications of establishing enteral access at the time of surgery remain poorly defined. This study aimed to assess the preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with the need for nutritional support after pancreatoduodenectomy, to guide decision-making for the establishment of intraoperative feeding access. METHODS: Retrospective study, analyzing the data of 562 consecutive patients, who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy between March 2013 to December 2020. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis was carried out to ascertain the factors associated with the initiation of and need for nutritional support for more than 7 days postop. The utility of tube jejunostomy was studied in patients in whom it was performed. RESULTS: Of 562 patients, 105 (18.7%) needed nutritional support. A tube jejunostomy was performed in 46 (8.2%) patients, parenteral nutrition was used in 83 (14.8%), and nasojejunal tube placed in 28 (4.9%) patients. On logistic regression analysis, age, serum albumin <3.0 gm/dl and operative blood loss were independently associated with the initiation of supportive nutrition, while preoperative gastric outlet obstruction (OR 3.105, 95% CI1.201-8.032, p = 0.019) and serum albumin <3.0 gm/dl (OR 2.669, 95% CI 1.131-6.300, p = 0.025) were associated with the need for prolonged nutritional support. The maximal benefit of tube jejunostomy was in patients with mental health disorders (83.3%). CONCLUSION: Tube jejunostomy for nutritional support after pancreatoduodenectomy can be considered in patients with preoperative gastric outlet obstruction, serum albumin <3.0 gm/dl and mental health disorders.

Esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis.

This review aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of hand-sewn esophageal anastomosis compared to mechanical anastomosis to reconstruct total gastrectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies evaluating hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis were performed. A total of 12 studies were selected, comprising 1761 individuals. The results indicate that the hand-sewn and stapled esophageal anastomosis have similar surgical outcomes. Stapled anastomosis has a shorter operation time.

Risk factors for refractory enterocutaneous fistula following button jejunostomy removal and its treatment using a novel extraperitoneal approach in patients with oesophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Enterocutaneous fistula after removal of the jejunostomy tube leads to multiple problems, such as cosmetic problems, decreased quality of life, electrolyte imbalances, infectious complications, and increased medical costs. However, the risk factors for refractory enterocutaneous fistula (REF) after button jejunostomy removal remain unclear. Therefore, in this study, we assessed the risk factors for REF after button jejunostomy removal in patients with oesophageal cancer and reported the surgical outcomes of the novel extraperitoneal approach (EPA) for REF closure. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 47 patients who underwent button jejunostomy removal after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer. We assessed the risk factors for REF in these patients and reported the surgical outcomes of the novel EPA for REF closure at the International University of Health and Welfare Hospital between March 2013 and October 2021. The primary endpoint was defined as the occurrence of REF after removal of the button jejunostomy, which was assessed using a maintained database. The risk factors and outcomes of the EPA for REF closure were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: REFs occurred in 15 (31.9%) patients. In the univariate analysis, REF was significantly more common in patients with albumin level < 4.0 g/dL (p = 0.026), duration > 12 months for button jejunostomy removal (p = 0.003), and with a fistula < 15.0 mm (p = 0.002). The multivariate analysis revealed that a duration > 12 months for button jejunostomy removal (odds ratio [OR]: 7.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-36.8; p = 0.019) and fistula < 15.0 mm (OR: 8.08; 95% CI: 1.50-43.6; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for REF. EPA for REF closure was performed in 15 patients. The technical success rate of EPA was 88.2%. Of the 15 EPA procedures, fistula closure was achieved in 12 (80.0%). The complications of EPA (11.7%) were major leakages (n = 3) and for two of them, EPA procedure was re-performed, and closure of the fistula was finally achieved. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that duration > 12 months for button jejunostomy removal and fistula < 15.0 mm are the independent risk factors for REF after button jejunostomy removal. EPA for REF closure is a novel, simple, and useful surgical option for patients with REF after oesophagectomy.

A novel endoscopic technique using fully covered self-expandable metallic stents for benign strictures after hepaticojejunostomy: the saddle-cross technique (with video).

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the number of patients with hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures has increased. Balloon dilation and placement of multiple plastic stents have proven effective for hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures. However, for refractory strictures, there is often a need for repeated endoscopic procedures within a short period. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the new saddle-cross technique, which uses two fully covered self-expandable metallic stents. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 20 patients with benign hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures who underwent placement of two fully covered self-expandable metallic stents at the National Cancer Center, Japan, from November 2017 to June 2021. RESULTS: The technical and clinical success rates were 100% (20/20). The median time of the procedure was 61 (range 25-122) min. The scheduled stent removal rate was 70% (14/20). Spontaneous dislodgement of the stent was observed on computed tomography in five patients (25.0%). The non-restenosis rate 12 months after the saddle-cross technique was 88.2% (15/17). Procedure-related early adverse events included mild ascending cholangitis in three patients (15.0%) and sepsis in one patient (5.0%). Procedure-related late adverse events included mild ascending cholangitis in three patients (15.0%) and bile duct hyperplasia in one patient (5.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The saddle-cross technique performed using two fully covered self-expandable metallic stents resulted in promising long-term stricture resolution with a high technical success rate. Based on these findings, the saddle-cross method can be considered an option for the standard procedure for benign hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures.