Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 53
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mol Ther ; 32(2): 503-526, 2024 Feb 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38155568

RESUMEN

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a rarely curable malignancy of plasma cells. MM expresses B cell maturation antigen (BCMA). We developed a fully human anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) with a heavy-chain-only antigen-recognition domain, a 4-1BB domain, and a CD3ζ domain. The CAR was designated FHVH33-CD8BBZ. We conducted the first-in-humans clinical trial of T cells expressing FHVH33-CD8BBZ (FHVH-T). Twenty-five patients with relapsed MM were treated. The stringent complete response rate (sCR) was 52%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 78 weeks. Of 24 evaluable patients, 6 (25%) had a maximum cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) grade of 3; no patients had CRS of greater than grade 3. Most anti-MM activity occurred within 2-4 weeks of FHVH-T infusion as shown by decreases in the rapidly changing MM markers serum free light chains, urine light chains, and bone marrow plasma cells. Blood CAR+ cell levels peaked during the time that MM elimination was occurring, between 7 and 15 days after FHVH-T infusion. C-C chemokine receptor type 7 (CCR7) expression on infusion CD4+ FHVH-T correlated with peak blood FHVH-T levels. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed a shift toward more differentiated FHVH-T after infusion. Anti-CAR antibody responses were detected in 4 of 12 patients assessed. FHVH-T has powerful, rapid, and durable anti-MM activity.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/metabolismo , Linfocitos T , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Médula Ósea/metabolismo
2.
Br J Haematol ; 204(2): 449-454, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38036424

RESUMEN

Autologous patient-derived adoptive T-cell therapies have revolutionized the management of relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). However, the current manufacturing and quality control processes result in lengthy vein-to-vein time, making bridging therapy necessary for most patients. Yet the decision and choice of optimal bridging therapy are complex in the heavily pretreated relapsed MM patient. In this perspective piece, the authors provide their approach and considerations while selecting an optimal bridging regimen before autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Linfocitos T , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B
3.
Br J Haematol ; 204(4): 1193-1206, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38393718

RESUMEN

Multiple myeloma is a bone marrow-based plasma cell tumour that develops from asymptomatic pre-cursor conditions smouldering myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and all are characterised by the presence of a monoclonal protein in the blood. Diagnosis and distinction between these conditions is based on blood tests, the bone marrow biopsy and cross sectional imaging. There are various risk stratification models that group patients with smouldering myeloma into risk groups based on risk of progression to symptomatic disease. Management is mainly observational for patients with smouldering myeloma although clinical trials for high-risk disease may be available. Restaging is required if evidence for progression.


Asunto(s)
Hematología , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada , Mieloma Múltiple , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Células Plasmáticas/patología , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/diagnóstico , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/terapia , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/patología , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad
4.
Br J Haematol ; 204(4): 1159-1175, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38390784

RESUMEN

Recent treatment advancements in multiple myeloma have led to significant improvements in patient outcomes. Maintenance therapy following autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is now standard of care and has been demonstrated to prolong and deepen treatment responses. Currently, lenalidomide remains the single agent that has been approved for maintenance post-AHCT in Europe and the USA which, if tolerated, is continued until disease progression. The treatment landscape is rapidly expanding however, and the optimal personalised maintenance approach for a patient is becoming more complex. Treatment outcomes for patients with high-risk disease remain poor and choice of maintenance in this population also remains unclear. This review article evaluates up-to-date literature regarding established maintenance approaches. It further analyses ongoing studies exploring maintenance regimens using combination and novel agents, approaches to maintenance in patients with cytogenetic high-risk disease and minimal residual disease response-adapted strategies that reflect the current evolving treatment paradigm.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Trasplante Autólogo , Lenalidomida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Trasplante de Células Madre
5.
Br J Haematol ; 200(1): 45-53, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36205375

RESUMEN

Belantamab mafodotin, an immuno-conjugate targeting B-cell maturation antigen, showed single-agent activity in phase 1 and 2 studies, and was recently approved for heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. Real-world data and long-term follow-up are scarce. We conducted a multisite retrospective study aimed to assess safety and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin monotherapy administered via the GSK expanded access compassionate care programme. One-hundred and six RRMM patients were treated with belantamab mafodotin between July 2019 and March 2021. The median age was 69.4 years. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of six (range 2-11) prior therapy lines. Major adverse effects included ocular toxicity (keratopathy 68.4%, grade ≥3: 40.5%; blurred vision 36.8%, grade ≥3: 6.3%), thrombocytopenia (27.4%, grade ≥3: 17.9%) and infections (11.3%, grade ≥3: 7.5%). Median follow-up time was 11.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.0-13.8] months. Overall response rate was 45.5%. Median progression-free survival was 4.7 (95% CI 3.5-5.9) months in the entire cohort and 8.8 (95% CI 6.6-10.9) months among responders. Median overall survival was 14.5 (95% CI 9.5-19.6) months, and not reached for responders. To conclude, in a real-world setting, belantamab mafodotin monotherapy showed efficacy comparable with the prospective clinical trials, with a tolerable toxicity profile.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Anciano , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Br J Haematol ; 201(6): 1103-1115, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36974007

RESUMEN

Lenalidomide maintenance in myeloma is well established. Nevertheless, pomalidomide could provide an alternative. Myeloma patients in first relapse, initially treated in the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) 2009 trial, and subsequently in the IFM 2013-01 phase 2 trial, received four cycles of salvage therapy with pomalidomide plus cyclophosphamide plus dexamethasone (PCD) with transplantation plus 2 PCD consolidation or without transplantation but with 5 PCD and for all patients pomalidomide plus dexamethasone maintenance therapy. This consisted of 28-day cycles of pomalidomide 4 mg daily on days 1-21 and dexamethasone 20 mg weekly until progression. The primary endpoint was an improved response to treatment. A total of 75/100 patients reached therapy. The median follow-up time was 73 months. The median duration of treatment was 23.7 months. One third of patients improved their response from the initiation of treatment: 11%, 19% and 4% to a very good partial response, complete response or stringent complete response respectively. The median progression-free survival time was 33.2 months and the median overall survival time was not reached. Among the 75 patients, the reasons for pomalidomide discontinuation were progressive disease (54%), adverse events (AEs) (30%), investigator discretion (11%) and consent withdrawal (5%). Grade (G) 3/4 haematological AEs included neutropenia (51%) and lymphopenia (35%); G3/4 drug-related non-haematological AEs (>5%) comprised 13% infections. Long-term administration of pomalidomide and dexamethasone is feasible and one third of the patients improved their response.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Terapia Recuperativa , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Dexametasona
7.
Oncologist ; 28(5): e263-e269, 2023 05 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37002943

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Because patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) do not always receive any treatment beyond first-line (1L) therapy, it is imperative that patients receive the best treatment in the 1L setting. However, the optimal initial treatment remains to be identified. We performed a clinical simulation to assess potential outcomes with different treatment sequences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used a partitioned survival model to compare overall survival (OS) with (1) daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-Rd) in 1L followed by a pomalidomide- or carfilzomib-based regimen in second line (2L) versus (2) bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) in 1L followed by a daratumumab-based regimen in 2L versus (3) lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in 1L followed by a daratumumab-based regimen in 2L. Probabilities of transition between health states (1L, 2L+, and death) were based on published clinical data and real-world data from the Flatiron Health database. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment after 1L (attrition rates) in the base case was estimated with a binomial logistic model using data from the MAIA trial. RESULTS: Using D-Rd in 1L conferred a longer median OS compared with delaying daratumumab-based regimens until 2L after VRd or Rd, respectively (8.9 [95% CrI 7.58-10.42] vs. 6.92 [5.92-8.33] or 5.75 [4.50-7.25] years). Results of scenario analyses were consistent with the base case. CONCLUSION: Our simulation, which incorporates clinically representative treatments and attrition rates, supports the use of D-Rd as initial therapy, rather than delaying the use of daratumumab until later lines of therapy, in patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/genética
8.
Br J Haematol ; 196(1): 105-109, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396516

RESUMEN

Incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) varies across different regimens in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Limited data exist on the use of direct oral anticoagulants as thromboprophylaxis in the setting of haematologic malignancies, specifically multiple myeloma. In this retrospective study of 305 NDMM patients, VTE rates in those treated with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (KRD) + aspirin (ASA), bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (RVD) + ASA, and KRD + rivaroxaban were statistically significant, 16·1%, 4·8%, and 4·8%, respectively. The findings confirm a higher incidence of VTE when using KRD induction compared to RVD induction and reveal that the use of low-dose rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis can mitigate this risk without an observable increase in bleeding rates.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico
9.
Ann Hematol ; 100(1): 1-10, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33009935

RESUMEN

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare opportunistic infection with high mortality rate usually seen in the context of immunosuppression. Although cases have been reported largely in patients with HIV/AIDS, following the use of monoclonal antibodies and occasionally in haematological malignancies, there is no review to date of patients with smouldering or treated myeloma who developed PML. Here, we conducted a literature search of PML cases in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), analyse patient and disease characteristics and describe the possible mechanisms that could lead to the development of PML. The lack of data and case reports until 2010 may indicate that PML in MM is underdiagnosed. Simultaneously, with an expanding field of new therapeutic options, patients with MM live longer, albeit continually immunosuppressed, and at risk of opportunistic infections. Emerging new treatments for PML in the horizon render the need to look out for this complication mandatory, and more case reports are needed to enrich our knowledge in this field.


Asunto(s)
Huésped Inmunocomprometido/efectos de los fármacos , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/inmunología , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/metabolismo , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido/fisiología , Factores Inmunológicos/metabolismo , Factores Inmunológicos/farmacología , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/metabolismo , Mieloma Múltiple/metabolismo
10.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(9)2021 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34066482

RESUMEN

Vitamin D is a steroid hormone that is essential for bone mineral metabolism and it has several other effects in the body, including anti-cancer actions. Vitamin D causes a reduction in cell growth by interrupting the cell cycle. Moreover, the active form of vitamin D, i.e., 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, exerts various effects via its interaction with the vitamin D receptor on the innate and adaptive immune system, which could be relevant in the onset of tumors. Multiple myeloma is a treatable but incurable malignancy characterized by the growth of clonal plasma cells in protective niches in the bone marrow. In patients affected by multiple myeloma, vitamin D deficiency is commonly correlated with an advanced stage of the disease, greater risk of progression, the development of pathological fractures, and a worse prognosis. Changes in the vitamin D receptor often contribute to the occurrence and progress of deficiencies, which can be overcome by supplementation with vitamin D or analogues. However, in spite of the findings available in the literature, there is no clear standard of care and clinical practice varies. Further research is needed to better understand how vitamin D influences outcomes in patients with monoclonal gammopathies.


Asunto(s)
Paraproteinemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Animales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Sistema Inmunológico/patología , Modelos Biológicos , Paraproteinemias/patología , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA