Long-Term Echocardiographic and Clinical Outcomes After Invasive and Non-Invasive Therapies for Sub-Massive and Massive Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

AIM: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant cause of mortality in the hospital setting. The objective of this study was to outline the long-term outcomes after surgical and non-surgical management for patients with massive and submassive PE. METHODS: Population cohort observational study evaluating all patients who presented to three tertiary hospitals in the state of Western Australia with access to cardiothoracic services over 5 years (2013-2018). Reviewed notes of all patients as well as radiology, linked mortality data and all available echocardiography studies at the primary hospital. RESULTS: In total, 245 patients were identified, of which 41 received surgical management and 204 non-surgical management; demographic data was similar. Clinically, the surgical group had higher rates of shock requiring vasopressors, severe bradycardia, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to intervention. The 28-day mortality was not statistically significantly different between the surgical embolectomy group (2/41 [4.2%]) and the non-surgical group (17/201 [8.3%]) (p=0.382). There was no difference in 12-month mortality, including when this was adjusted for vasopressors, right ventricular (RV) strain, troponin, and brain natriuretic peptide. In the massive PE sub-group, 28-day mortality was not significantly different: 2/29 (6.9%) surgical group vs 7/34 (20.2%) non-surgical group (p=0.064). Higher rates of severe RV impairment and dilatation were present in the surgical group. All patients with available echocardiography studies at outpatient follow-up returned to normal or mild RV impairment. CONCLUSION: Patients who presented with massive or submassive PE had similar outcomes whether treated with surgical or non-surgical management. Surgical embolectomy is a safe option in a cardiothoracic centre setting.

Lessons learned on a new procedure: Nonsternotomy minimally invasive pulmonary embolectomy.

The endpoint in emergent management of acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) has traditionally been with embolectomy through a standard median sternotomy. This approach is limited in both exposure and concomitant functional morbidity associated with sternotomy. In a previous publication, we described a novel minimally invasive, thoracoscopically assisted approach to pulmonary embolectomy. This approach utilized a small 5-cm left upper parasternal thoracotomy and femoral cardiopulmonary bypass to conduct thoracoscopically assisted surgical pulmonary embolectomy. The first publication featured three patients that had a massive pulmonary embolus that was treated with minimally invasive pulmonary embolectomy, and the initial data was positive and suggested that this approach is safe and feasible. We now broaden our experience with another two patients who underwent this approach, and highlight a number of technical and management modifications that have been made to optimize the procedure. These lessons learned will ideally benefit future surgeons as this approach is more heavily implemented in practice.

Operative management of ascending aorta thrombus and bilateral pulmonary embolism in the setting of breast cancer.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) and concomitant floating aortic thrombus are a rare and potentially life-threatening association. Several therapeutic options are available and best management can be controversial when these conditions coexist. We describe a case of a 79-year-old woman presented with massive PE and simultaneous floating thrombus in the ascending aorta. She underwent concomitant ascending aortic replacement and surgical pulmonary embolectomy with an uneventful postoperative recovery. Open surgical repair is a one stage approach that may offer the most efficient treatment to allow survival.

Surgical Treatment in a High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Case Report.

We present the case of a 35-year-old woman who had a high-risk pulmonary embolism (according to ESC risk stratification for pulmonary embolism) after she had undergone a Caesarion section. Postoperatively, she presented with acute left lower limb pain, swelling and erythema. A diagnosis was made of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the ilio-femoral and popliteal veins. She was started on anticoagulant therapy, which proved to be inefficient, the patient developing a left calf and thigh oedema and shortness of breath. A CT scan revealed high-risk embolus located in the right atrium and through the tricuspid valve. The decision was made to refer her to a cardiovascular surgeon. During her preoperative evaluation, the patient became hemodynamically unstable and was rushed into the operating room, severely desaturated, bradycardic, without consciousness, with severe hypotension. On the basis of the severe state of the patient and the CT scan findings we performed an emergency pulmonary embolectomy, with the patient on cardio-pulmonary by-pass, without cross-clamping the aorta, using a modified Trendelenburg procedure. This case supports using open pulmonary embolectomy for patients with hemodynamic instability on the basis of clinical diagnosis.

Successful pulmonary embolectomy with central extra-corporeal membranous oxygenation for acute pulmonary thromboembolism.

The treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism with a hemorrhagic condition is quite challenging and it usually presents a clinical dilemma. Pulmonary embolectomy is generally performed with cardiopulmonary bypass; however, cardiopulmonary bypass usually requires full anticoagulation which cannot be used for patients with a hemorrhagic condition. We herein report a successful case of pulmonary embolectomy that was accomplished using central veno-arterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation, instead of cardiopulmonary bypass, for a patient with an acute fatal pulmonary thromboembolism and hemorrhagic cerebral infarction following lung cancer surgery. Our strategy consists of surgical embolectomy under central veno-arterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation with partial anticoagulation and the placement of an inferior vena cava filter to prevent recurrence without the use of anticoagulation therapy.

Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

BACKGROUND: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major threat to the health and lives of hospitalized patients. This study was conducted to clarify the real-world outcomes of pulmonary embolectomy.Methods and Results:Retrospective investigation of 355 patients who underwent pulmonary embolectomy for acute PE was conducted using the Japanese Cardiovascular Surgery Database. Risk factors for operative death within 30 days after pulmonary embolectomy and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including operative death, postoperative stroke and postoperative coma, were analyzed. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was required preoperatively in 27.6%, and preoperative veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was performed in 26.5%. Urgent or emergency operation was performed in 93% of patients. Operative mortality rate was 73/355 (20.6%). Incidence of MACE was 97/355 (27.3%). In univariate analysis, preoperative predictors of death were obesity, renal dysfunction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver injury, recent myocardial infarction, shock, refractory shock, CPR, heart failure, inotrope use, poor left ventricular function, preoperative arrhythmia and tricuspid regurgitation. In multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for operative death were heart failure (P=0.013), poor left ventricular function (P=0.007), and respiratory failure (P=0.001). Poor left ventricular function (P=0.033), preoperative CPR (P=0.002) and respiratory failure (P=0.007) were independent risk factors for MACE. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of pulmonary embolectomy were acceptable, considering the urgency and preoperative comorbidities of patients. Early triage of patients with hemodynamically unstable PE is important.

Surgical pulmonary embolectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with preserved hemodynamics but right ventricular dysfunction, classified as submassive PE, carries a high risk of mortality. We report the results for patients who did not qualify for medical therapy and required treatment of submassive PE with surgical pulmonary embolectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). METHODS: Between October 1999 and May 2015, 133 submassive PE patients underwent treatment with pulmonary embolectomy (71) and CDT (62). A multidisciplinary PE response team helped to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy on a case-by-case basis. The EkoSonic ultrasound-facilitated thrombolysis system (EKOS) was used for CDT, which was introduced in 2010. RESULTS: The mean age of submassive PE patients was 57.3 years, which included 36.8% females. PE risk factors included previous deep venous thrombosis (46.6%), immobility (36.1%), recent surgery (30.8%), and cancer (22.6%), P < 0.05. The most common indication for advanced treatment was right ventricular strain (42.9%), P = 0.03. The frequency of surgical pulmonary embolectomy remained stable even after incorporating the EKOS procedure into our treatment algorithm, with statistically similar operative mortality. Bleeding was observed in six CDT patients and one pulmonary embolectomy patient (P < 0.05). Follow-up echocardiography was available for 61% of the overall cohort, of whom 76.5% had no residual moderate or severe right ventricular dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary embolectomy and CDT are important contemporary advanced treatment options for selected high-risk patients with submassive PE, who do not qualify for medical therapy.

The Outcomes of Surgical Pulmonary Embolectomy for Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, short- and long-term cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortalities and postoperative morbidities of surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) for patients with massive or submassive pulmonary embolism. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify articles reporting SPE for pulmonary embolism. The outcomes included in-hospital and long-term mortality in addition to postoperative morbidities. The random effect inverse variance method was used. Cumulative meta-analysis, leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed. Results: Among the 1949 searched studies in our systematic literature search, 78 studies met our inclusion criteria, including 6859 cases. The mean age ranged from 42 to 65 years. The percentage of males ranged from 25.6% to 86.7%. The median rate of preoperative cardiac arrest was 27.6%. The percentage of contraindications to preoperative systemic thrombolysis was 30.4%. The preoperative systemic thrombolysis use was 11.5%. The in-hospital mortality was estimated to be 21.96% (95% CI: 19.21-24.98); in-hospital mortality from direct cardiovascular causes was estimated to be 16.05% (95% CI: 12.95-19.73). With a weighted median follow-up of 3.05 years, the late cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality incidence rates were 0.39 and 0.90 per person-year, respectively. The incidence of pulmonary bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, surgical site bleeding, non-surgical site bleeding and wound complications was 0.62%, 4.70%, 4.84%, 5.80% and 7.2%, respectively. Cumulative meta-analysis showed a decline in hospital mortality for SPE from 42.86% in 1965 to 20.56% in 2024. Meta-regression revealed that the publication year and male sex were associated with lower in-hospital mortality, while preoperative cardiac arrest, the need for inotropes or vasopressors and preoperative mechanical ventilation were associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: This study demonstrates acceptable perioperative mortality rates and late cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in patients who undergo SPE for massive or submassive pulmonary embolism.

Bilateral pulmonary septic embolectomy in the setting of multivalvular acute infective endocarditis surgery.

We report a case of multivalvular acute infective endocarditis associated with a bilateral septic pulmonary embolism. The patient underwent aortic and tricuspid valve replacement, mitral valve anterior leaflet debridement and bilateral pulmonary septic embolectomy, followed by a 6-week intravenous antibiotic treatment. We present our multidisciplinary approach for the management of such complex cases.

Surgical pulmonary embolectomy: state of the art.

Acute pulmonary embolism is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Patients in life-threatening conditions require timely and effective interventions to improve pulmonary perfusion. The indications for surgical embolectomy in the thrombolysis era have been limited. This article discusses surgical techniques and outlines the position of surgical embolectomy concerning other treatment modalities.

Massive septic pulmonary embolism from infective endocarditis obstructing the right pulmonary artery: a case report.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a relatively rare but life-threatening condition with potential complications such as valve dysfunction, abscess formation, development of penetrating lesions and embolization of septic material. In this case report, we describe the case of a 56-year-old with IE involving the tricuspid valve and resulting in near total occlusion of the right pulmonary artery due to embolization of a massive piece of septic material. While embolization of septic material is well documented, associated occlusion of the right pulmonary artery is rare.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but life-threatening condition with potential complications such as heart valve dysfunction, formation of collections of infected material, development of defects in the heart, and the travel of infected material causing blockages. In this case report, we describe the case of a 56-year-old with IE involving one of the heart valves and resulting in near total blockage of one of the main blood vessels to the lungs due to the dislodgement of a large piece of infected material. While dislodgement and travel of infected material is well documented, associated blockages of the main arteries is rare.

Acute pulmonary embolism with coexisting right heart thrombi in transit-surgical treatment of 20 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVES: The presence of right heart thrombi in transit (RHTiT) in the setting of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with high mortality. The optimal management in such cases is inconclusive. We present the results of surgical treatment of 20 consecutive patients diagnosed with high- or intermediate-high-risk PE with coexisting RHTiT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment in the Medicover Hospital between 2013 and 2021 for acute PE with coexisting thrombi in-transit in right heart cavities. The diagnosis was based on echocardiography, computed tomography pulmonary angiography and laboratory tests. Eligibility criteria for surgical treatment were acute PE with RHTiT, right ventricular overload on imaging studies and significantly elevated levels of cardiac troponin and NTproBNP. All patients were operated on with extracorporeal circulation using deep hypothermia and total circulatory arrest. The primary end point was hospital all-cause mortality; secondary end points were perioperative complications and long-term mortality. RESULTS: The analysis included 20 patients. There was no in-hospital death. Nearly one-third of patients required temporal hemofiltration for postoperative renal failure, but this did not involve the need for dialysis at discharge. No neurological complications occurred in any patient. The mean follow-up was 46 months (range 13-98). There was 1 death in the long-term follow-up, not related to PE. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of patients with acute PE and coexisting RHTiT can provide favourable results.

Role of catheter-directed therapies in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Expert opinion of the Polish PERT Initiative, Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation, Association of Cardiovascular Interventions, and Association of Intensive Cardiac Care of the Polish Cardiac Society.

Thanks to advances in interventional cardiology technologies, catheter-directed treatment has become recently a viable therapeutic option in the treatment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism at high risk of early mortality. Current transcatheter techniques allow for local fibrinolysis or embolectomy with minimal risk of complications. Therefore, these procedures can be considered in high-risk patients as an alternative to surgical pulmonary embolectomy when systemic thrombolysis is contraindicated or ineffective. They are also considered in patients with intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism who do not improve or deteriorate clinically despite anticoagulation. The purpose of this article is to present the role of transcatheter techniques in the treatment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. We describe current knowledge and expert opinions in this field. Interventional treatment is described in the broader context of patient care organization and therapeutic modalities. We present the organization and responsibilities of pulmonary embolism response team, role of pre-procedural imaging, periprocedural anticoagulation, patient selection, timing of intervention, and intensive care support. Currently available catheter-directed therapies are discussed in detail including standardized protocols and definitions of procedural success and failure. This expert opinion has been developed in collaboration with experts from various Polish scientific societies, which highlights the role of teamwork in caring for patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Flexible fibre optic bronchoscopy as angioscope to ascertain completeness of pulmonary embolectomy: surgery for pulmonary embolism-how I do it.

Rarely pulmonary embolectomy has also been used as a salvage procedure for acute right ventricle (RV) dysfunction following acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Complete surgical removal of thromboembolus in acute pulmonary thromboembolism is an essential pre-requisite for good outcome. Complete clearance of thromboembolic load from pulmonary arterial tree is difficult to assess intraoperatively. We hereby describe the use of flexible fibre optic bronchoscope (FFB) as angioscope to visualise the pulmonary arterial tree intraoperatively. Angioscopy ascertains the complete clearance up to subsegmental level after thromboembolectomy and aids in the removal of residual thrombus or embolus. Herein, we describe a case series of two patients, where FFB was used as angioscope during surgery for APE.

A Novel Case of Cardiac Tamponade after Percutaneous Pulmonary Embolectomy Using the FlowTriever Retrieval/Aspiration System.

Introduction: Percutaneous embolectomy using the percutaneous large-bore aspiration embolectomy FlowTriever system (INARI Medical, Irvine, CA, USA) is a promising method for reducing high clot burden in patients with intermediate- to high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). Case Description: A 45-year-old woman with intermediate- to high-risk PE underwent percutaneous intervention using the FlowTriever retrieval/aspiration system. After the procedure, she experienced several cardiac arrests from pericardial tamponade and required pericardiocentesis, leading to haemodynamic stabilization. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of the use of the FlowTriever system causing micro-perforation of the right ventricle, resulting in tamponade and cardiac arrest. Conclusion: Percutaneous embolectomy has shown promise results in reducing clot burden and improving haemodynamic stability but has risks and limitations and requires specialized knowledge and training. In addition, more data are required from centres using the FlowTriever system to ensure adequate training and safety. LEARNING POINTS: Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy using the FlowTriever or similar devices can be paramount in reducing morbidity and mortality from an intermediate- to high-risk pulmonary embolism given the immediate improvement in haemodynamics that cannot be achieved by anticoagulation alone.Cardiac micro-perforation is a potential complication of catheter-based embolectomy devices such as FlowTriever and should be suspected in the setting of pericardial effusion following the procedure.

Massive Embolism: Knife versus PCI.

Pulmonary embolism is the third most common cardiovascular syndrome with an estimated up to 25% of patients presenting with sudden death. For those who survive, a mainstay of management for patients with hemodynamic stability is anticoagulation; however, recommendations and options are rapidly changing for patients with submassive or massive pulmonary embolism with hemodynamic instability. Catheter-based and surgical approaches offer efficacious management options for unstable patients or patients with contraindications to anticoagulation; however, both approaches have inherent benefits and risk. This article seeks to offer a brief review on the recommendations and options for management of pulmonary embolism from both surgical and catheter-based perspectives.