Comprehensive review of the use of hydrogel spacers prior to radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To provide a comprehensive narrative review of the published data on the impact of hydrogel spacers on rectal dosimetry and toxicity and to outline the practicalities of inserting hydrogel spacers. RESULTS: A growing body of evidence suggests that the administration of hydrogel spacers is safe and is associated with limited peri-operative morbidity. The impact on rectal dosimetry has been clearly established and use of hydrogel spacers is associated with reduced rectal morbidity. These results have been corroborated by several Phase II and III clinical trials and subsequent meta-analysis. There are several areas for future research, including the role of hydrogel spacers in prostate stereotactic beam radiotherapy and post-radiotherapy local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrogel spacers provide a low-morbidity method to potential reduce rectal toxicity after radiation therapy in men with prostate cancer. Data outlining sexual function and oncological outcomes are limited to date. Future studies, currently being conducted, may provide further clarification of the role of hydrogel spacers in prostate cancer management.

The effect of integrating knowledge-based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT.

Knowledge-based planning (KBP) and multicriteria optimization (MCO) are two powerful tools to assist treatment planners in achieving optimal target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. The purpose of this work is to investigate if integrating MCO with conventional KBP can further improve treatment plan quality for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). A two-phase study was designed to investigate the impact of MCO and KBP in prostate SBRT treatment planning. The first phase involved the creation of a KBP model based on thirty clinical SBRT plans, generated by manual optimization (KBP_M). A ten-patient validation cohort was used to compare manual, MCO, and KBP_M optimization techniques. The next phase involved replanning the original model cohort with additional tradeoff optimization via MCO to create a second model, KBP_MCO. Plans were then generated using linear integration (KBP_M+MCO), non-linear integration (KBP_MCO), and a combination of integration methods (KBP_MCO+MCO). All plans were analyzed for planning target volume (PTV) coverage, OAR constraints, and plan quality metrics. Comparisons were generated to evaluate plan and model quality. Phase 1 highlighted the necessity of KBP and MCO in treatment planning, as both optimization methods improved plan quality metrics (Conformity and Heterogeneity Indices) and reduced mean rectal dose by 2 Gy, as compared to manual planning. Integrating MCO with KBP did not further improve plan quality, as little significance was seen over KBP or MCO alone. Principal component score (PCS) fitting showed KBP_MCO improved bladder and rectum estimated and modeled dose correlation by 5% and 22%, respectively; however, model improvements did not significantly impact plan quality. KBP and MCO have shown to reduce OAR dose while maintaining desired PTV coverage in this study. Further integration of KBP and MCO did not show marked improvements in treatment plan quality while requiring increased time in model generation and optimization time.

Temporal course of late rectal toxicity & impact of intervention in patients undergoing radiation for cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: : There is limited information available on the temporal course of late stage radiotherapy adverse effects. The present study reports on the temporal course of late toxicities after chemoradiation and brachytherapy. METHODS: : Women with cervical cancer who presented with late toxicity after (chemo) radiation were included in the study. Grade of toxicity (Clinical Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03) and type of intervention were recorded at three-monthly interval for the first year and then six monthly until 24 months. Direct cost for the management of toxicity was calculated. Univariate analysis was performed to understand the impact of various factors on persistence of toxicity. RESULTS: : Ninety two patients were included in this study. Grades I, II, III and IV toxicities were observed in 50 (54%), 33 (36%), 7 (8%) and 2 (2%) patients, respectively, at first reporting. Patients spent a median of 12 (3-27) months with toxicity. At 12 months, 48/92 (52.2%) patients had a complete resolution of toxicity, whereas 27/92 (29.3%) patients had low grade (I-II) persistent toxicity. Only 6/92 (6.5%) patients who had grade III-IV toxicity had resolution to a lower grade. Four (4.3%) patients died due to toxicity. At 24 months, 9 (10%) patients continued to have grade ≥ III toxicity. On an average, 7 (2-24) interventions were required for the clinical management of late toxicity and median direct cost incurred was ₹ 50,625 (1,125-303,750). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: : In this study late radiation toxicity resolved within 12 months in more than half of patients. However, others are likely to have had persistent lower grade toxicity or progression to higher grade. Structured strategies are hence needed for the effective management of late toxicities.

Clinical effects of rectal retractor application in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Background: Radiation-induced rectal toxicities remain as a major risk during prostate radiotherapy. One approach to the reduction of rectal radiation dose is to physically increase the distance between the rectal wall and prostate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether the application of the rectal retractor (RR) can reduce rectal dose and toxicity in prostate cancer 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Methods: Overall, 36 patients with localized prostate cancer were randomized into the 2 groups, 18 patients with RR in-place and 18 without RR. All patients underwent planning computed tomography (CT). Patients were treated with 70 Gy in 35 fractions of 3D-CRT. In the RR group, RR was used during cone-down 20 treatment fractions. Acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were assessed using EORTC/RTOG scoring system weekly during radiotherapy, 3, and 12 months after treatment. Device-related events were recorded according to CTCAE version 4.0. Patient characteristics, cancer differences, and dosimetric data for the RR and non-RR groups were compared using a Man-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and Fisher exact test for categorical data. The EORTC/RTOG scores for the 2 groups were compared using Fisher exact test. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A RR significantly reduced mean dose (Dmean) to the rectum as well as rectal volume receiving 50% to 95% (V50-95%) of prescribed dose. The absolute reduction of rectal Dmean was 10.3 Gy. There was no statistically significant difference in acute GI toxicity between groups during treatment or at 3 months. At 12 months, 2 patients in the RR group and 9 in the control group experienced late grade ≥ 1 GI toxicity (p=0.027). No patients in the RR group reported late grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity, whereas 3 patients in the control group experienced late grade 2 GI toxicity. In the RR group, 6 patients reported grade 1 rectal discomfort and pain according to CTCAE version 4.0. Conclusion: The application of the RR showed a significant rectum sparing effect, resulting in substantially reducing late GI toxicity.

Evaluating the predictive value of quantec rectum tolerance dose suggestions on acute rectal toxicity in prostate carcinoma patients treated with IMRT.

AIM: To investigate the predictive value of convenience of rectum dosimetry with Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) dose limits, maximum rectum dose (Dmax), total rectal volume (TVrectum), rectal volume included in PTV (VrectumPTV) on Grade 2-3 acute rectal toxicity for utilization in clinical practice. BACKGROUND: Numerous previous data have reported frequent acute proctitis after external-beam RT of prostate cancer. Predicting toxicity limited with dose information is inadequate in clinical practice due to comorbidities and medications used. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Sixty-four non-metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT were enrolled. Patients were treated to a total dose of 70-76 Gy. Rectal dose volume histograms (DVH) of all patients were evaluated retrospectively, and a QUANTEC Score between 0 and 5 was calculated for each patient. The correlation between the rectal DVH data, QUANTEC score, TVrectum, VrectumPTV, rectum Dmax and Grade 2-3 rectal toxicity was investigated. RESULTS: In the whole group grade 1, 2 and 3 acute rectal toxicities were 25%, 18.8% and 3.1%, respectively. In the DVH data, rectum doses of all patients were under RTOG dose limits. Statistically significant correlation was found between grade 2-3 rectal toxicity and TVrectum (p = 0,043); however. It was not correlated with QUANTEC score, VrectumPTV and Dmax. CONCLUSION: Our results were not able to show any significant correlation between increasing convenience with QUANTEC limits and lower rectal toxicity. Conclusively, new dosimetric definitions are warranted to predict acute rectal toxicity more accurately in prostate cancer patients during IMRT treatment.

Rectal retractor application during image-guided dose-escalated prostate radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate efficacy of a rectal retractor (RR) on rectal dose during image-guided dose-escalated prostate three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 21 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with a RR for 3DCRT in 40â€¯× 2 Gy. Patient underwent two scans for radiotherapy planning, without and with RR. RR was used for the first half of the treatment sessions. Two plans were created for each patient to compare the effect of RR on rectal doses. PTW-31014 Pinpoint chamber embedded within RR was used for in vivo dosimetry in 6 of 21 patients. The patient tolerance and acute rectal toxicity were surveyed during radiotherapy using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4.0. RESULTS: Patients tolerated the RR well during 20 fractions with mild degree of anal irritation. Using a RR significantly reduced the rectal wall (RW), anterior RW and posterior RW dose-volume parameters. The average RW Dmean was 29.4 and 43.0 Gy for plans with and without RR, respectively. The mean discrepancy between the measured dose and planned dose was -3.8% (±4.9%). Grade 1 diarrhea, rectal urgency and proctitis occurred in 4, 2 and 3 cases, respectively. There were no grade ≥2 acute rectal toxicities during the treatment. CONCLUSION: Rectal retraction resulted in a significant reduction of rectal doses with a safe toxicity profile, which may reduce rectal toxicity. Dosimeter inserted into the RR providing a practical method for in vivo dosimetric verification. Further prospective clinical studies will be necessary to demonstrate the clinical advantage of RR.

Definitive, intensity modulated tomotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost for prostate cancer patients - Long term data on toxicity and biochemical control.

AIM: To report long-term data regarding biochemical control and late toxicity of simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) with tomotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. BACKGROUND: Dose escalation improves cancer control after curative intended radiation therapy (RT) to patients with localized prostate cancer, without increasing toxicity, if IMRT is used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated long-term toxicity and biochemical control of the first 40 patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer receiving SIB-IMRT. Primary target volume (PTV) 1 including the prostate and proximal third of the seminal vesicles with safety margins was treated with 70 Gy in 35 fractions. PTV 2 containing the prostate with smaller safety margins was treated as SIB to a total dose of 76 Gy with 2.17 Gy per fraction. Toxicity was evaluated using an adapted CTCAE-Score (Version 3). RESULTS: Median follow-up of living patients was 66 (20-78) months. No late genitourinary toxicity higher than grade 2 has been reported. Grade 2 genitourinary toxicity rates decreased from 58% at the end of the treatment to 10% at 60 months. Late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was also moderate, though the prescribed PTV Dose of 76 Gy was accepted at the anterior rectal wall. 74% of patients reported any GI toxicity during follow up and no toxicity rates higher than grade 2 were observed. Grade 2 side effects were reported by 13% of the patients at 60 months. 5-year freedom from biochemical failure was 95% at our last follow up. CONCLUSION: SIB-IMRT using daily MV-CT guidance showed excellent long-term biochemical control and low toxicity rates.

Rectal radiation dose-reduction techniques in prostate cancer: a focus on the rectal spacer.

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. External beam radiotherapy by a variety of methods is a standard treatment option with excellent disease control. However, acute and late rectal side effects remain a limiting concern in intensification of therapy in higher-risk patients and in efforts to reduce treatment burden in others. A number of techniques have emerged that allow for high-radiation dose delivery to the prostate with reduced risk of rectal toxicity, including image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy, endorectal balloons and various forms of rectal spacers. Image-guided radiation therapy, either intensity-modulated radiation therapy or stereotactic ablative radiation therapy, in conjunction with a rectal spacer, is an efficacious means to reduce acute and long-term rectal toxicity.

Decreased acute toxicities of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with prostate-based versus bone-based image guidance.

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a major therapeutic option for localized prostate cancer. Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) allows tumor visualization and corrects the errors caused by daily internal movement of the prostate. The current study retrospectively compared the acute toxicities and biochemical tumor control outcomes of prostate IMRT achieved using two IGRT techniques: bony structure-based IGRT (B-IGRT) and prostate-based IGRT (P-IGRT). METHODS: Between February 2011 and July 2014, 96 patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated using P-IGRT based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT; 76 Gy) without fiducial markers. This group of patients was compared with a similar cohort of 96 patients who were treated with B-IGRT (74 Gy) between July 2007 and September 2011. The planning target volume (PTV) margins were 1-3 mm smaller in the P-IGRT group than in the B-IGRT group. RESULTS: The median follow-up periods for all patients, the P-IGRT group, and the B-IGRT group were 42, 32, and 64 months, respectively. A significantly lower incidence of acute grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal toxicities was observed in the P-IGRT group compared with the B-IGRT group (3 vs. 11%; p = 0.049). The prostate-specific antigen failure-free survival rates at 3 years were 95.5 and 92.7% for the P-IGRT and B-IGRT groups, respectively (p = 0.534). CONCLUSIONS: IMRT with P-IGRT allows PTV margin reduction without sacrificing tumor control, which successfully reduces acute rectal toxicity compared with IMRT with B-IGRT.

Postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the sooner the better and potential to reduce toxicity even further.

PURPOSE: To evaluate biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), overall survival (OS), late rectal and bladder toxicities in a retrospective single institution series, also applying an in-house software for biological dose calculation. METHODS: 258 patients submitted to radiotherapy after prostatectomy were considered. Differences between groups were calculated using the log-rank test and the relevant clinical and therapeutic variables were considered for multivariate analysis. PRODVH is an in-house system able to calculate mean dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of a series of patients, to convert them in biologically effective DVHs (BEDVHs) and allowing to compare them with ANOVA and t Student test. RESULTS: Adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) were performed in 131 (50.8%) and 127 patients (49.2%). At multivariate analysis advanced T stage, androgen deprivation total (ADT) and SRT resulted as independent variables related to a worst bRFS (p = 0.019, 0.001 and 0.02), while GS > 7 and SRT affected negatively OS (p 0.047 and 0.039). High grade toxicity events occurred mainly in patients treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) (proctitis p = 0.006; cystitis: p = 0.041). A significantly more favorable mean rectum BEDVH for patients with G0 or G1 rectal toxicity was shown (p < 0.001). Mean BEDVH for both bladder (p < 0.01) and rectum (p < 0.05) were also significantly better for volumetric modulated arc therapy-image guided radiotherapy (VMAT-IGRT) plans than for 3DCRT plans. CONCLUSION: ART is better than SRT in terms of bRFS and OS, particularly for more aggressive cases, advanced T stage and higher Gleason Score. Postoperative prostate cancer radiotherapy should be applied as soon as possible after surgery. The use of modern techniques such as VMAT-IGRT significantly reduces toxicity.

Effect of synthetic CT on dose-derived toxicity predictors for MR-only prostate radiotherapy.

Objectives: Toxicity-driven adaptive radiotherapy (RT) is enhanced by the superior soft tissue contrast of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging compared with conventional computed tomography (CT). However, in an MR-only RT pathway synthetic CTs (sCT) are required for dose calculation. This study evaluates 3 sCT approaches for accurate rectal toxicity prediction in prostate RT. Methods: Thirty-six patients had MR (T2-weighted acquisition optimized for anatomical delineation, and T1-Dixon) with same day standard-of-care planning CT for prostate RT. Multiple sCT were created per patient using bulk density (BD), tissue stratification (TS, from T1-Dixon) and deep-learning (DL) artificial intelligence (AI) (from T2-weighted) approaches for dose distribution calculation and creation of rectal dose volume histograms (DVH) and dose surface maps (DSM) to assess grade-2 (G2) rectal bleeding risk. Results: Maximum absolute errors using sCT for DVH-based G2 rectal bleeding risk (risk range 1.6% to 6.1%) were 0.6% (BD), 0.3% (TS) and 0.1% (DL). DSM-derived risk prediction errors followed a similar pattern. DL sCT has voxel-wise density generated from T2-weighted MR and improved accuracy for both risk-prediction methods. Conclusions: DL improves dosimetric and predicted risk calculation accuracy. Both TS and DL methods are clinically suitable for sCT generation in toxicity-guided RT, however, DL offers increased accuracy and offers efficiencies by removing the need for T1-Dixon MR. Advances in knowledge: This study demonstrates novel insights regarding the effect of sCT on predictive toxicity metrics, demonstrating clear accuracy improvement with increased sCT resolution. Accuracy of toxicity calculation in MR-only RT should be assessed for all treatment sites where dose to critical structures will guide adaptive-RT strategies. Clinical trial registration number: Patient data were taken from an ethically approved (UK Health Research Authority) clinical trial run at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Study Name: MR-simulation in Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03238170.

CT-guided hydrogel injection for brachytherapy in cervical cancer: A case report.

Rectal toxicity is a significant concern in cervical cancer radiotherapy. Despite advancements in image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT), rectal morbidity remains a challenge. Injectable hydrogel showed promise in creating a space between the vagina and rectum, reducing rectal radiation dose; however, the traditional ultrasound-guided injection revealed some problems, such as the inadequate separation of the upper edge of the cervix, which can be mitigated through adopting CT-guided injection. This case report presents the successful use of computed tomography (CT)-guided hydrogel injection to limit rectal doses and improve treatment outcomes. A forty-year-old female with stage IIIC1r cervical cancer received external-beam radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Due to the proximity of the tumor to the rectum, a CT-guided hydrogel injection was performed to increase the distance between the cervix and rectum. Post-injection, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated increased distances between the cervix and rectum. Subsequent MRI-based IGBT achieved high clinical target volume doses while limiting rectal doses. During the six-month follow-up, the patient reported only mild adverse effects. CT-guided hydrogel injection offers advantages over ultrasound-guided injection in cervical cancer radiotherapy. The technique allows for better puncture position adjustment, reduced reliance on specialized ultrasound expertise, and shorter puncture distances. This case report highlights the potential of hydrogel injection as a viable method to reduce rectal morbidity and improve treatment outcomes in a broader range of cervical cancer patients. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore its applicability in larger cohorts.

Impact of Rectal Spacer on Toxicity Reduction in Men Treated With Proton Versus Photon Therapy.

Purpose: Rectal toxicity after prostate cancer (PCa) radiation therapy (RT) may be greater with protons compared with photon intensity-modulated RT, perhaps due to lateral penumbra and end-of-range uncertainty. Rectal spacers (RSs) have been shown to mitigate RT-associated acute/late rectal toxicity in men treated with photons. The relative benefit of RS in men treated with protons versus photons is unknown. We hypothesize that RS will confer greater bowel toxicity benefits in PCa treated with protons versus photons. Materials and Methods: We conducted a single institution, retrospective review of men receiving photon intensity-modulated RT or pencil-beam scanning proton RT for localized PCa. Four cohorts were compared: photon with or without RS, and proton with or without RS. Acute (<3 months), late (≥3 months), and most recent toxicity were compared among the 4 cohorts. The cumulative incidence of physician-reported grade 1 to 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (common terminology criteria for adverse events V5.0) was compared using χ2 or Fisher exact test. Patient-reported toxicity was evaluated using the International Prostate Expanded Prostate Composite Index-Clinical Practice and compared using linear mixed modeling. Results: In total, 164 patients were eligible for analysis: 38 photons without RS, 50 photons with RS, 26 protons without RS, and 50 protons with RS. The median follow-up was 17.6 months. In proton patients, acute (6.12% vs 30.77%, P = .009) and most recent (4.26% vs 26.09%, P = .01) G1-2 GI toxicity was lower with versus without RS. In photon patients, there were no significant differences in toxicity with versus without RS. No significant differences in patient-reported outcomes were observed with versus without RS in photon or proton groups. Conclusion: The rectal spacer was associated with lower G1-2 acute and most recent GI toxicity in men treated with protons; this difference was not observed in men treated with photons. While this study is limited by sample size, a relatively greater benefit of RS with proton versus photon therapy was observed.

Predictors of radiation-induced late rectal toxicity in prostate cancer treatment: a volumetric and dosimetric analysis.

Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignancy in European men, often treated with radiotherapy (RT) for localized disease. While modern RT achieves high success rates, concerns about late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities persist. This retrospective study aims to identify predictors for late GI toxicities following definitive conventionally fractionated external beam RT (EBRT) for PCa, specifically exploring the dose to the rectal wall. Materials and methods: A cohort of 96 intermediate- to high-risk PCa patients underwent EBRT between 2008 and 2016. Rectum and rectum wall contours were delineated, and 3D dose matrices were extracted. Volumetric and dosimetric indices were computed, and statistical analyses were performed to identify predictors using the Mann-Whitney U-rank test, logistic regression, and recursive feature elimination. Results: In our cohort, 15 out of 96 patients experienced grade II late proctitis. Our analysis reveals distinct optimal predictors for rectum and rectum wall (RW) structures varying with α/ß values (3.0 and 2.3 Gy) across prescribed doses of 68 to 76 Gy. Despite variability, RW predictors demonstrate greater consistency, notably V68Gy[%] to V74Gy[%] for α/ß 3.0 Gy, and V68Gy[%] to V70Gy[%] for α/ß 2.3 Gy. The model with α/ß 2.3 Gy, featuring RW volume receiving 70 Gy (V70Gy[%]), stands out with a BIC value of 62.92, indicating its superior predictive effectiveness. Finally, focusing solely on the rectum structure, the V74Gy[%] emerges the best predictor for α/ß 3.0 Gy, with a BIC value of 66.73. Conclusion: This investigation highlights the critical role of V70Gy[%] in the rectum wall as a robust predictor for grade II late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity following external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer (PCa). Furthermore, our findings suggest that focusing on the rectum wall specifically, rather than the entire rectum, may offer improved accuracy in assessing proctitis development. A V70Gy (in EQD2 with α/ß 2.3 Gy) of ≤5% and if possible ≤1% for the rectal wall should be achieved to minimize the risk of late grade II proctitis.

Late rectal and bladder toxicity following radiation therapy for prostate cancer: Predictive factors and treatment results.

AIM: This study aimed at investigating factors associated to late rectal and bladder toxicity following radiation therapy and the effectiveness of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) when toxicity is grade ≥2. BACKGROUND: Radiation is frequently used for prostate cancer, but a 5-20% incidence of late radiation proctitis and cystitis exists. Some clinical and dosimetric factors have been defined without a full agreement. For patients diagnosed of late chronic proctitis and/or cystitis grade ≥2 treatment is not well defined. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) has been used, but its effectiveness is not well known. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 257 patients were treated with radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Clinical, pharmacological and dosimetric parameters were collected. Patients having a grade ≥2 toxicity were treated with HBOT. Results of the intervention were measured by monitoring toxicity by Common Toxicity Criteria v3 (CTCv3). RESULTS: Late rectal toxicity was related to the volume irradiated, i.e. V50 > 53.64 (p = 0.013); V60 > 38.59% (p = 0.005); V65 > 31.09% (p = 0.002) and V70 > 22.81% (p = 0.012). We could not correlate the volume for bladder. A total of 24 (9.3%) patients experienced a grade ≥2. Only the use of dicumarinic treatment was significant for late rectal toxicity (p = 0.014). A total of 14 patients needed HBOT. Final percentage of patients with a persistent toxicity grade ≥2 was 4.5%. CONCLUSION: Rectal volume irradiated and dicumarinic treatment were associated to late rectal/bladder toxicity. When toxicity grade ≥2 is diagnosed, HBOT significantly ameliorate symptoms.

Hyaluronic acid spacer in prostate cancer radiotherapy: dosimetric effects, spacer stability and long-term toxicity and PRO in a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Perirectal spacers may be beneficial to reduce rectal side effects from radiotherapy (RT). Here, we present the impact of a hyaluronic acid (HA) perirectal spacer on rectal dose as well as spacer stability, long-term gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity and patient-reported outcome (PRO). METHODS: In this phase II study 81 patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer received transrectal injections with HA before external beam RT (78 Gy in 39 fractions). The HA spacer was evaluated with MRI four times; before (MR0) and after HA-injection (MR1), at the middle (MR2) and at the end (MR3) of RT. GI and GU toxicity was assessed by physician for up to five years according to the RTOG scale. PROs were collected using the Swedish National Prostate Cancer Registry and Prostate cancer symptom scale questionnaires. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in rectal V70% (54.6 Gy) and V90% (70.2 Gy) between MR0 and MR1, as well as between MR0 to MR2 and MR3. From MR1 to MR2/MR3, HA thickness decreased with 28%/32% and CTV-rectum space with 19%/17% in the middle level. The cumulative late grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity at 5 years was 5% and the proportion of PRO moderate or severe overall bowel problems at 5 years follow-up was 12%. Cumulative late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity at 5 years was 12% and moderate or severe overall urinary problems at 5 years were 10%. CONCLUSION: We show that the HA spacer reduced rectal dose and long-term toxicity.

Same-day versus delayed simulation imaging after placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer for prostate radiotherapy.

Introduction: Placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of rectal toxicity from prostate radiation. Practices vary regarding the timing of CT simulation after hydrogel placement, and the ideal schedule remains unknown. Methods: Thirty patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided placement of an iodinated SpaceOAR™ hydrogel prior to radiotherapy. Per evolving practice, 15 completed same-day simulation and 15 returned for simulation 1-2 weeks later. Hydrogel volume, perirectal distance, air-void volume, and rectal dosimetry per NRG GU005 were compared between CT simulation, 1st fraction Cone-Beam-CT (CBCT), and final CBCT. Results: CT simulation occurred 8.8 ± 2.4 days after placement in the delayed group, with no significant difference in the interval between simulation and 1st fraction between groups (p = 0.165). Greater observed de-creases in hydrogel volume (0.57 cc vs. 0.04 cc, p = 0.0002), and perirectal distance at both mid-gland (1.32 mm vs. 0.17 mm) and tallest point (2.40 mm vs. 0.04 mm) were seen on 1st-fraction CBCT in the same-day group (p = 0.0039; p = 0.0002). Per dosimetry recalculated on 1st fraction CBCT, five (D3 cc and D50%) versus one (D50%) rectal dose parameters were exceeded in the same-day and delayed groups, respectively, and 10 versus one parameters had a relative increase of ≥ 20%. Conclusion: Due to the evolving anatomic changes in the days following hydrogel placement, same-day simulation scanning may introduce unintended variability in rectal dosimetry at the time of prostate radiotherapy.

Radiomics based predictive modeling of rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: CT and MRI comparison.

BACKGROUND: Rectal toxicity is one of the common side effects after radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients. Radiomics is a non-invasive and low-cost method for developing models of predicting radiation toxicity that does not have the limitations of previous methods. These models have been developed using individual patients' information and have reliable and acceptable performance. This study was conducted by evaluating the radiomic features of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images and using machine learning (ML) methods to predict radiation-induced rectal toxicity. METHODS: Seventy men with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer, eligible for three-dimensional radiation therapy (3DCRT) participated in this prospective trial. Rectal wall CT and MR images were used to extract first-order, shape-based, and textural features. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used for feature selection. Classifiers such as Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) were used to create models based on radiomic, dosimetric, and clinical data alone or in combination. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to assess each model's performance. RESULTS: The best outcomes were achieved by the radiomic features of MR images in conjunction with clinical and dosimetric data, with a mean of AUC: 0.79, accuracy: 77.75%, specificity: 82.15%, and sensitivity: 67%. CONCLUSIONS: This research showed that as radiomic signatures for predicting radiation-induced rectal toxicity, MR images outperform CT images.

Neural network dose prediction for rectal spacer stratification in dose-escalated prostate radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To develop a knowledge-based decision-support system capable of stratifying patients for rectal spacer (RS) insertion based on neural network predicted rectal dose, reducing the need for time- and resource-intensive radiotherapy (RT) planning. METHODS: Forty-four patients treated for prostate cancer were enrolled into a clinical trial (NCT03238170). Dose-escalated prostate RT plans were manually created for 30 patients with simulated boost volumes using a conventional treatment planning system (TPS) and used to train a hierarchically dense 3D convolutional neural network to rapidly predict RT dose distributions. The network was used to predict rectal doses for 14 unseen test patients, with associated toxicity risks calculated according to published data. All metrics obtained using the network were compared to conventionally planned values. RESULTS: The neural network stratified patients with an accuracy of 100% based on optimal rectal dose-volume histogram constraints and 78.6% based on mandatory constraints. The network predicted dose-derived grade 2 rectal bleeding risk within 95% confidence limits of -1.9% to +1.7% of conventional risk estimates (risk range 3.5%-9.9%) and late grade 2 fecal incontinence risk within -0.8% to +1.5% (risk range 2.3%-5.7%). Prediction of high-resolution 3D dose distributions took 0.7 s. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of using a neural network to provide rapid decision support for RS insertion prior to RT has been demonstrated, and the potential for time and resource savings highlighted. Directly after target and healthy tissue delineation, the network is able to (i) risk stratify most patients with a high degree of accuracy to prioritize which patients would likely derive greatest benefit from RS insertion and (ii) identify patients close to the stratification threshold who would require conventional planning.

Acute and Late Rectal Toxicity Following Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Results of a Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Previous randomized clinical trials have shown that moderate hypofractionation has a non-inferior or even superior efficacy to conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. We herein aimed to evaluate the acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HRT) in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma eligible to receive HRT were prospectively enrolled. All patients were submitted to rectoscopy after completion of HRT, every three months after radiotherapy for the first year and every six months for the second year. Toxicity events were classified as acute, when presenting during radiotherapy or within the first three months following its completion, and as late when appearing three months to three years post-HRT. RESULTS: Twenty prostate cancer patients participated in this study and received 22 sessions of HRT (5 sessions a week; 2.75 Gy per session) and an overall dose of 60.5 Gy. None of our patients developed acute GI toxicity; late GI toxicity (RTOG/EORTC grade 3 rectal bleeding) was observed in 1 patient only (1/20, 5%), at 6- and 12-months post-HRT. No rectal mucosa damage was observed on follow-up rectoscopy in the acute phase in any of our patients; five patients (5/20, 25%) developed late telangiectasias. Vienna retroscopy score (VRS) was 1 in 4/5 patients (80%) and 2 in 1/5 (20%). CONCLUSION: Minimal radiation-induced rectal mucosal damage was observed in our patient population, and only as a late event, further attesting to the safety of HRT in this setting.