Trauma systems in Asian countries: challenges and recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma burden is one of the leading causes of young human life and economic loss in low- and middle-income countries. Improved emergency and trauma care systems may save up to 2 million lives in these countries. METHOD: This is a comprehensive expert opinion participated by 4 experts analyzing 6 Asian countries compiling the most pressing trauma care issues in Asia as well as goal directed solutions for uplifting of trauma care in these countries. RESULT: Lack of legislation, stable funding under a dedicated lead agency is a major deterrent to development and sustainment of trauma systems in most Asian countries. While advocating trauma, critical care as a specialty is a key event in the system establishment, Trauma specialized training is challenging in low resource settings and can be circumvented by regional cooperation in creating trauma specialized academic centers of excellence. Trauma quality improvement process is integral to the system maturity but acquisition and analysis of quality data through trauma specific registries is the least developed in the Asian setting.

Trauma systems in high socioeconomic index countries in 2050.

Considerable political, structural, environmental and epidemiological change will affect high socioeconomic index (SDI) countries over the next 25 years. These changes will impact healthcare provision and consequently trauma systems. This review attempts to anticipate the potential impact on trauma systems and how they could adapt to meet the changing priorities. The first section describes possible epidemiological trajectories. A second section exposes existing governance and funding challenges, how these can be met, and the need to incorporate data and information science into a learning and adaptive trauma system. The last section suggests an international harmonization of trauma education to improve care standards, optimize immediate and long-term patient needs and enhance disaster preparedness and crisis resilience. By demonstrating their capacity for adaptation, trauma systems can play a leading role in the transformation of care systems to tackle future health challenges.

Personal goals of young survivors of violent injury: implications for practice.

INTRODUCTION: Firearm injuries are the leading cause of death among young people in the USA and disproportionately impact communities of colour and those experiencing socioeconomic distress. Understanding the personal goals of violently injured patients is essential to identifying protective factors and developing interventions that promote them. However, limited research characterising these personal goals exists. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to use qualitative thematic analysis to analyse and describe the personal goals of young people who enrolled in a region-wide hospital-based violence intervention programme after surviving a violent injury. METHODS: A qualitative coding framework was developed, evaluated, and implemented using data from Life Outside of Violence, the St. Louis Area Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Programme. Chart abstraction procedures were used to compile qualitative data on Life Outside of Violence participants' personal goals documented by clinical case managers during individual treatment planning sessions with participants (n=168). Descriptive analyses are reported and implications for practice are discussed. RESULTS: Key findings reveal that (1) violent injury survivors have unmet therapeutic and resource needs, indicating the importance of having service providers with both clinical and case management skills, (2) anger management is a common clinical goal, and (3) employment opportunities are a common resource need. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study inform the implementation of the Life Outside of Violence programme and offer a roadmap to other hospital-based violence intervention programmes operating nation-wide. Our results provide insight into participants' needs, desires, and motivations, allowing unique opportunities for improved participant engagement and service delivery.

Community emergency medical services approaches to fall prevention: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among older adults in the USA. Current approaches to fall prevention often rely on referral by primary care providers or enrolment during inpatient admissions. Community emergency medical services (CEMS) present a unique opportunity to rapidly identify older adults at risk for falls and provide fall prevention interventions in the home. In this systematic review, we seek to assess the efficacy and qualitative factors determining success of these programs. METHODS: Studies reporting the outcomes of fall prevention interventions delivered by EMS were identified by searching the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through 11 July 2023. RESULTS: 35 studies including randomised and non-randomised experimental trials, systematic reviews and qualitative research primarily from Western Europe, the USA, Australia and Canada were included in our analysis. Current fall prevention efforts focus heavily on postfall referral of at-risk community members. CEMS fall prevention interventions reduced all-cause and fall-related emergency department encounters, subsequent falls and EMS calls for lift assist. These interventions also improved patient health-related quality of life, independence with activities of daily living, and secondary health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: CEMS programmes provide an opportunity for direct, proactive fall prevention on the individual level. Addressing barriers to implementation in the context of current emergency medical systems in the USA is the next step toward widespread implementation of these novel fall prevention interventions.

An Analysis of Injured Patients Treated at Level 1 Trauma Centers Versus Other Centers: A Scoping Review.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma systems continue to evolve to create the best outcomes possible for patients who have undergone traumatic injury. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to evaluate the existing research on outcomes based on field triage to a Level 1 trauma center (L1TC) compared to other levels of hospitals and nontrauma centers. METHODS: A structured literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane Database. Studies analyzing measures of morbidity, mortality, and cost after receiving care at L1TCs compared to lower-level trauma centers and nontrauma centers in the United States and Canada were included. Three independent reviewers reviewed abstracts, and two independent reviewers conducted full-text review and quality assessment of the included articles. RESULTS: Twelve thousand five hundred fourteen unique articles were identified using the literature search. 61 relevant studies were included in this scoping review. 95.2% of included studies were national or regional studies, and 96.8% were registry-based studies. 72.6% of included studies adjusted their results to account for injury severity. The findings from receiving trauma care at L1TCs vary depending on severity of injury, type of injury sustained, and patient characteristics. Existing literature suffers from limitations inherent to large de-identified databases, making record linkage between hospitals impossible. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review shows that the survival benefit of L1TC care is largest for patients with the most severe injuries. This scoping review demonstrates that further research using high-quality data is needed to elucidate more about how to structure trauma systems to improve outcomes for patients with different severities of injuries and in different types of facilities.

The State of the Union: Trauma System Development in the United States.

Injury is both a national and international epidemic that affects people of all age, race, religion, and socioeconomic class. Injury was the fourth leading cause of death in the United States (U.S.) in 2021 and results in an incalculable emotional and financial burden on our society. Despite this, when prevention fails, trauma centers allow communities to prepare to care for the traumatically injured patient. Using lessons learned from the military, trauma care has grown more sophisticated in the last 50 years. In 1966, the first civilian trauma center was established, bringing management of injury into the new age. Now, the American College of Surgeons recognizes 4 levels of trauma centers (I-IV), with select states recognizing Level V trauma centers. The introduction of trauma centers in the U.S. has been proven to reduce morbidity and mortality for the injured patient. However, despite the proven benefits of trauma centers, the U.S. lacks a single, unified, trauma system and instead operates within a "system of systems" creating vast disparities in the level of care that can be received, especially in rural and economically disadvantaged areas. In this review we present the history of trauma system development in the U.S, define the different levels of trauma centers, present evidence that trauma systems and trauma centers improve outcomes, outline the current state of trauma system development in the U.S, and briefly mention some of the current challenges and opportunities in trauma system development in the U.S. today.

Legal epidemiology of paediatric dog bite injuries.

BACKGROUND: Dog bite injuries cause over 100 000 paediatric emergency department visits annually. Our objective was to analyse associations between regional dog ownership laws and incidence of paediatric dog bites. METHODS: This observational study used an online search to locate local dog-related policies within Ohio cities. Data collected by Ohio Partners For Kids from 2011 through 2020 regarding claims for paediatric dog bite injuries were used to compare areas with and without located policies and the incidence of injury. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 6175 paediatric patients with dog bite injury encounters. A majority were white (79.1%), male (55.0%), 0-5 years old (39.2%) and did not require hospital admission (98.1%). Seventy-nine of 303 cities (26.1%) had city-specific policies related to dogs. Overall, the presence of dog-related policies was associated with lower incidence of dog bite injury claims (p=0.01). Specifically, metropolitan areas and the Central Ohio region had a significantly lower incidence when dog-related policies were present (324.85 per 100 000 children per year when present vs 398.56 when absent; p<0.05; 304.87 per 100 000 children per year when present vs 411.43 when absent; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of city-specific dog-related policies is associated with lower incidence of paediatric dog bite injury claims, suggesting that local policy impacts this important public health issue. There are limited dog-related policies addressing dog bite prevention, with inconsistencies in breadth and depth. Creating consistent, practical requirements among policies with vigorous enforcement could ameliorate public health concerns from paediatric dog bite injuries.

Injury outcomes across Canadian trauma systems: a historical cohort study.

PURPOSE: Most North American trauma systems have designated trauma centres (TCs) including level I (ultraspecialized high-volume metropolitan centres), level II (specialized medium-volume urban centres), and/or level III (semirural or rural centres). Trauma system configuration varies across provinces and it is unclear how these differences influence patient distributions and outcomes. We aimed to compare patient case mix, case volumes, and risk-adjusted outcomes of adults with major trauma admitted to designated level I, II, and III TCs across Canadian trauma systems. METHODS: In a national historical cohort study, we extracted data from Canadian provincial trauma registries on major trauma patients treated between 2013 and 2018 in all designated level I, II, or III TCs in British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec, and Nova Scotia; level I and II TCs in New Brunswick; and four TCs in Ontario. We used multilevel generalized linear models to compare mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission and competitive risk models for hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS). Ontario could not be included in outcome comparisons because there were no population-based data from this province. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 50,959 patients. Patient distributions in level I and II TCs were similar across provinces but we observed significant differences in case mix and volumes for level III TCs. There was low variation in risk-adjusted mortality and LOS across provinces and TCs but interprovincial and intercentre variation in risk-adjusted ICU admission was high. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that differences in the functional role of TCs according to their designation level across provinces leads to significant variations in the distribution of patients, case volumes, resource use, and clinical outcomes. These results highlight opportunities to improve Canadian trauma care and underline the need for standardized population-based injury data to support national quality improvement efforts.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La plupart des systèmes de traumatologie nord-américains disposent de centres de traumatologie (CT) désignés, y compris de niveau I (centres métropolitains ultraspécialisés à volume élevé), de niveau II (centres urbains spécialisés à volume moyen) et/ou de niveau III (centres semi-ruraux ou ruraux). La configuration des systèmes de traumatologie varie d'une province à l'autre et nous ne savons pas comment ces différences influent sur la répartition de la patientèle et sur les issues. Notre objectif était de comparer le mélange de cas des patient·es, le volume de cas et les issues ajustées en fonction du risque des adultes ayant subi un traumatisme majeur admis·es dans des CT désignés de niveaux I, II et III dans l'ensemble des systèmes de traumatologie canadiens. MéTHODE: Dans une étude de cohorte historique nationale, nous avons extrait des données des registres provinciaux canadiens de traumatologie sur les patient·es ayant subi un traumatisme majeur traité·es entre 2013 et 2018 dans tous les CT désignés de niveau I, II ou III en Colombie-Britannique, en Alberta, au Québec et en Nouvelle-Écosse, les CT de niveau I et II au Nouveau-Brunswick, et dans quatre CT en Ontario. Nous avons utilisé des modèles linéaires généralisés à plusieurs niveaux pour comparer la mortalité, les admissions en unité de soins intensifs (USI) et les modèles de risque compétitif pour la durée du séjour à l'hôpital et à l'USI. L'Ontario n'a pas pu être inclus dans les comparaisons des devenirs parce qu'il n'y avait pas de données démographiques pour cette province. RéSULTATS: L'échantillon de l'étude comptait 50 959 patient·es. La répartition des patient·es dans les CT de niveaux I et II était similaire d'une province à l'autre, mais nous avons observé des différences significatives dans le mélange des cas et les volumes pour les CT de niveau III. Il y avait une faible variation de la mortalité ajustée en fonction du risque et des durées de séjour entre les provinces et les CT, mais la variation interprovinciale et intercentre des admissions à l'USI ajustées en fonction du risque était élevée. CONCLUSION: Nos résultats suggèrent que les différences dans le rôle fonctionnel des CT selon leur niveau de désignation d'une province à l'autre entraînent des variations importantes dans la répartition des patient·es, le nombre de cas, l'utilisation des ressources et les issues cliniques. Ces résultats mettent en évidence les possibilités d'amélioration des soins de traumatologie au Canada et soulignent la nécessité de disposer de données normalisées sur les blessures dans la population pour appuyer les efforts nationaux d'amélioration de la qualité.

Trauma Prevalence and Resource Utilization During 4 COVID-19 "Surges": A National Analysis of Trauma Patients From 92 Trauma Centers.

INTRODUCTION: We aim to assess the trends in trauma patient volume, injury characteristics, and facility resource utilization that occurred during four surges in COVID-19 cases. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 92 American College of Surgeons (ACS)-verified trauma centers (TCs) in a national hospital system during 4 COVID-19 case surges was performed. Patients who were directly transported to the TC and were an activation or consultation from the emergency department (ED) were included. Trends in injury characteristics, patient demographics & outcomes, and hospital resource utilization were assessed during four COVID-19 case surges and compared to the same dates in 2019. RESULTS: The majority of TCs were within a metropolitan or micropolitan division. During the pandemic, trauma admissions decreased overall, but displayed variable trends during Surges 1-4 and across U.S. regions and TC levels. Patients requiring surgery or blood transfusion increased significantly during Surges 1-3, whereas the proportion of patients requiring plasma and/or platelets increased significantly during Surges 1-2. Patients admitted to the hospital had significantly higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) and mortality as compared to pre-pandemic during Surge 1 and 2. Patients with Medicaid or uninsured increased significantly during the pandemic. Hospital length of stay (LOS) decreased significantly during the pandemic and more trauma patients were discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma admissions decreased during Surge 1, but increased during Surge 2, 3 and 4. Penetrating injuries and firearm-related injuries increased significantly during the pandemic, patients requiring surgery or packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfusion increased significantly during Surges 1-3. The number of patients discharged home increased during the pandemic and was accompanied by a decreased hospital length of stay (LOS).

The Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Trauma Registry and Performance Improvement Operations and Workforce Nationwide: A Survey of Trauma Center Association of America Members.

BACKGROUND: Trauma Centers integrate Trauma Registrars and Performance Improvement Nurses to drive quality care. Delays in their duties could have negative impacts on outcomes and performance. We aim to investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Trauma Center operations by assessing performance of trauma registry and performance improvement processes across the United States. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed utilizing data from two anonymous questionnaires distributed to Trauma Center Association of America members. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's Exact Test, and multivariable logistic regression were performed with statistical significance defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Of 90.2% (83) of Trauma Registrars and 85.9% (67) of Performance Improvement personnel reported that their Trauma Centers have treated COVID-19 patients. Among trauma registrars, respondents did not significantly differ in the current status of completing registry cases (P> 0.05), during COVID-19 compared to prior (P> 0.05), or adjusted odds of COVID-19 delaying completion of entries (P> 0.05). Having >2 Performance Improvement Nurses was significantly associated with improved performance during the COVID-19 pandemic (P= 0.03) whereas working at a Trauma Center which treats adults-only or mixed patient population (adult and pediatric) was associated with being 1-3 months behind in closing of performance improvement cases (P= 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The negative impact of COVID-19 on Trauma Registrars and Performance Improvement Nurses has been minimal. Adequate staffing/experience seem to mitigate delays and decreased performance. Implementation of expanded staffing, improved training, and evidenced-based revision of Trauma Center logistics may help mitigate future disruptions relating to COVID-19 and allow Trauma Centers to recover and improve their operations.

Overutilization of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services in Central Gulf Coast Region Results in Unnecessary Expenditure.

INTRODUCTION: When appropriately used, helicopter emergency medical services (HEMSs) allow for timely delivery of severely injured patients to definitive care. Inappropriate utilization of HEMSs results in increased cost to the patient and trauma system. The purpose of this study was to review current HEMS criteria in the central Gulf Coast region and evaluate for potential areas of triage refinement and cost savings. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients received potentially unwarranted HEMS transport. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all patients with trauma arriving to a level I trauma center by helicopter over 28 mo was performed; 381 patients with trauma and with HEMS transport from the scene were included. Data were collected from prehospital sources, as well as hospital chart review for each patient. The primary outcome was the rate of unwarranted HEMS transport. RESULTS: A total of 381 adult patients with trauma transported by the HEMS were analyzed, of which 34% were deemed potentially nonwarranted transports. The significant factors correlating with warranted HEMS transport included age, multiple long bone fractures, penetrating mechanism, and vehicle ejection. Insurance demographics did not correlate to transport modality. Many of these patients were transported from a location within the same county or the county adjacent to the trauma center. When comparing patients transported by ground and HEMSs from the same scene, no time savings were identified. Unwarranted transports at the trauma center represented an estimated health care expenditure of over $3 million. CONCLUSIONS: HEMSs may be overused in the central Gulf Coast region, creating the risk for a substantial resource and financial burden to the trauma system. Further collaboration is needed to establish HEMS triage criteria, that is, more appropriate use of resources.

Review of the requirements for effective mass casualty preparedness for trauma systems. A disaster waiting to happen?

Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) are diverse, unpredictable, and increasing in frequency, but preparation is possible and necessary. The nature of MCIs requires a trauma response but also requires effective and tested disaster preparedness planning. From an international perspective, the aims of this narrative review are to describe the key components necessary for optimisation of trauma system preparedness for MCIs, whether trauma systems and centres meet these components and areas for improvement of trauma system response. Many of the principles necessary for response to MCIs are embedded in trauma system design and trauma centre function. These include robust communication networks, established triage systems, and capacity to secure centres from threats to safety and quality of care. However, evidence from the current literature indicates the need to strengthen trauma system preparedness for MCIs through greater trauma leader representation at all levels of disaster preparedness planning, enhanced training of staff and simulated disaster training, expanded surge capacity planning, improved staff management and support during the MCI and in the post-disaster recovery phase, clear provision for the treatment of paediatric patients in disaster plans, and diversified and pre-agreed systems for essential supplies and services continuity. Mass casualty preparedness is a complex, iterative process that requires an integrated, multidisciplinary, and tiered approach. Through effective preparedness planning, trauma systems should be well-placed to deliver an optimal response when faced with MCIs.

Care of the older trauma patient following low-energy transfer trauma-highlighting a research void.

BACKGROUND: in high-income countries trauma patients are becoming older, more likely to have comorbidities, and are being injured by low-energy mechanisms. This systematic review investigates the association between higher-level trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients who were admitted to hospital due to injuries sustained following low-energy trauma. METHODS: a systematic review was conducted in January 2021. Studies were eligible if they reported outcomes in adults admitted to hospital due to low-energy trauma. In the presence of study heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was pre-specified. RESULTS: three studies were included from 2,898 unique records. The studies' risk of bias was moderate-to-serious. All studies compared outcomes in trauma centres verified by the American College of Surgeons in the USA. The mean/median ages of patients in the studies were 73.4, 74.5 and 80 years. The studies reported divergent results. One demonstrated improved outcomes in level 3 or 4 trauma centres (Observed: Expected Mortality 0.973, 95% CI: 0.971-0.975), one demonstrated improved outcomes in level 1 trauma centres (Adjusted Odds Ratio 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56-0.91), and one demonstrated no difference between level 1 or 2 and level 3 or 4 trauma centre care (adjusted odds ratio 0.91, 95% CI: 0.80-1.04). CONCLUSIONS: the few relevant studies identified provided discordant evidence for the value of major trauma centre care following low-energy trauma. The main implication of this review is the paucity of high-quality research into the optimum care of patients injured in low-energy trauma. Further studies into triage, interventions and research methodology are required.

Domestic violence and injuries: prevalence and patterns-a pilot database study to identify suspected cases in a UK major trauma centre.

BACKGROUND: Victim-survivors of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) present to secondary care with isolated injuries to the head, limb or face. In the UK, there are no published studies looking at the relationship of significant traumatic injuries in adults and the relationship to DVA.The primary objective was to assess the feasibility of using a tailored search method to identify cases of suspected DVA in the national audit database for trauma. The secondary objective was to assess the association of DVA with clinical characteristics. METHODS: We undertook a single-centre retrospective observational cohort pilot study. Data were analysed from the local Trauma and Audit Research Network (TARN) database. The 'Scene Description' field in the database was searched using a tailored search strategy. Feasibility was evaluated with notes review and assessed by the PPV and prevalence. Secondary objectives used a logistic regression in Excel. RESULTS: This method of identifying suspected cases of DVA from the TARN database is feasible. The PPV was 100%, and the prevalence of suspected DVA in the study period was 3.6 per 1000 trauma discharges. Of those who had experienced DVA, 52.7% were male, median age 43 (IQR: 33-52) and mortality 5.5%. Subgroup analysis of older people demonstrated longer hospital stay (p=0.17) and greater likelihood of admission to intensive care (OR 2.60, 95% CI 0.48 to 14.24). CONCLUSION: We have created a feasible methodology to identify suspected DVA-related injuries within the TARN database. Future work is needed to further understand this relationship on a national level.

Barriers and opportunities of establishing an integrated prehospital emergency response system in North West Ethiopia: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital emergency care helps to reduce mortality and morbidity from time-sensitive conditions. In this study, we summarised the perspectives of various stakeholders on the establishment of a prehospital integrated emergency response system. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using a key informant interview. We used a purposive sampling technique to select participants from the sector offices based on their proximity to the problem under consideration. We took verbal informed consent from each participant before the interviews. We conducted a thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-three study participants, working at six sector offices (the zonal health office, University of Gondar, traffic office, fire extinguisher office, the Amhara regional health bureau and the Ethiopian red cross association), were included in this study. Five major themes have emerged. The themes that emerged include participants' views on the importance of prehospital service, barriers and opportunities for establishing the system, and how to start and sustain the system. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Lack of resources is not the main reason for the lack of prehospital emergency care in the study area rather; lack of commitment, ownership and high turnover of decision-makers were the main reasons for the absence of prehospital care, as viewed by respondents. On the other side, the availability of professionals, training institutions and the fact that emergency care is a shared agenda by different stakeholders were stated as an opportunity to establish the system. With the growing number of injuries and non-communicable diseases, emergency management should get due attention.

Blood component use and injury characteristics of acute trauma patients arriving from the scene of injury or as transfers to a large, mature US Level 1 trauma center serving a large, geographically diverse region.

BACKGROUND: Advanced trauma care demands the timely availability of hemostatic blood products, posing special challenges for regional systems in geographically diverse areas. We describe acute trauma blood use by transfer status and injury characteristics at a large regional Level 1 trauma center. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We reviewed Harborview Medical Center (HMC) Trauma Registry, Transfusion Service, and electronic medical records on acute trauma patients for demographics, injury patterns, blood use, and in-hospital mortality, 2011-2019. RESULTS: Among 47,471 patients (mean age 45.2 ± 23.0 years; 68.3% male; Injury Severity Score 12.6 ± 11.1), 4.7% died and 8547 (18%) received at least one blood component through HMC. Firearms injuries were the most often transfused (690/2596, 26.6%) and the most urgently (39.9% ≥3 units in <1 h; 40.6% ≥5 units in <4 h), and had the highest mortality (case-fatality, 12.2%) (all p < .001). From-scene patients were younger than transfers (42.9 ± 21.0 vs. 47.2 ± 24.4), predominated among firearms injuries (68.2% from-scene vs. 31.8% transfers), were more likely to receive blood (18.5% vs. 17.6%) more urgently (≥3 units first hour, 24.4% vs. 7.7%; ≥5 units first 4 h: 25.6% vs. 8.2%), were more likely to die of hemorrhage (15.5% vs. 4.3%) and from firearms injuries (310/1360, 22.8%) (all p < .001). DISCUSSION: Early blood use, firearms injuries, and mortality were all greater among from-scene patients, and firearms injuries had worse outcomes despite greater and more urgent blood use, but the role of survivor bias for transfer patients must be clarified. Future research must identify strategies for providing local hemostatic transfusion support, particularly for firearms injuries.

The Short and the Long of it: Timing of Mortality for Older Adults in a State Trauma System.

BACKGROUND: The impact of injury extends beyond the hospital stay, but trauma center performance metrics typically focus on in-hospital mortality. We compared risk adjusted rates of in-hospital and long-term mortality among Pennsylvania trauma centers. We hypothesized that centers with low rates of in-hospital mortality would also have low rates of long-term mortality. METHODS: We identified injured patients (age ≥ 65) admitted to Pennsylvania trauma centers in 2013 and 2014 using the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study, a robust, state-wide trauma registry. We matched trauma registry records to Medicare claims from the y 2013 to 2015. Matching variables included admission date and patient demographics including date of birth, zip, sex, and race and/or ethnicity. Outcomes examined were inpatient, 30-day, and 1-y mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models including presenting physiology, comorbidities, injury characteristics, and demographics were developed to calculate expected mortality rates for each trauma center at each time point. Trauma center performance was assessed using observed-to-expected ratios and ranking for in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-y mortality. RESULTS: Of the 15,451 patients treated at 28 centers, 8.1% died before discharge or were discharged to hospice. Another 3.4% died within 30 d, and another 14.7% died within 1 y of injury. Of patients who survived hospitalization but died within 30 d, 92.5% were injured due to fall, and 75.0% sustained head injuries. Survival at 1 y was higher in patients discharged home (88.4%), compared to those discharged to a skilled nursing facility or long-term acute care hospital (72.7% and 52.6%, respectively). Three centers were identified as outliers (two low and one high) for in-hospital mortality, none of which were outliers when the horizon was stretched to 30 d from injury. At 30 d, two different low and two different high outliers were found. CONCLUSION: Nearly one-in-three injured older adults who die within 30 d of injury dies after hospital discharge. Hospital rankings for in-hospital mortality correlate poorly with long-term outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of looking beyond survival to discharge for quality improvement and benchmarking.

Geographic Distribution of Orthopaedic Trauma Resources and Service Use in the United States: A Cross Sectional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Management of orthopaedic injury is an essential component of comprehensive trauma care, and availability of orthopaedic surgeons impacts trauma system capacity and accessibility of care. We sought to estimate the geographic distribution of orthopaedic injury in the United States and identify regions needing additional orthopaedic trauma resources. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study using 2014 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality State Inpatient Datasets from 26 states and the District of Columbia, administrative data were used to determine hospital referral region (HRR)-level incidence of orthopaedic trauma and surgical care. Factors associated with HRR-level orthopaedic trauma volume were identified using negative binomial regression, and model parameters were used to estimate injury incidence and operative volume in unobserved HRRs. The primary outcomes of interest were HRR-level incidence of orthopaedic injury, polytrauma, and emergency orthopaedic surgery, as well and the number of emergency orthopaedic surgery patients per orthopaedic surgeon. RESULTS: Orthopaedic injury incidence and operative patients per orthopaedic surgeon were associated with HRR-level volume of medical service use, population characteristics, geographic characteristics, and existing trauma care resources. Orthopaedic injury incidence ranged from 20 patients/HRR to 33,260 patients/HRR. Polytrauma incidence ranged from < 10 patients/HRR to 12,140 patients/HRR. Emergency orthopaedic surgery incidence ranged from < 10 patients/HRR to 18,759 patients/HRR. The volume of operative orthopaedic trauma patients per orthopaedic surgeon ranged from < 10 patients/surgeon to 224 patients and/or surgeon. DISCUSSION: The incidence of orthopaedic injury and volume of injury patients per orthopaedic surgeon varies substantially across HRRs in the United States. Regions with high patient volume and moderate patient-to-provider ratios may be ideal settings for orthopaedic trauma training programs or post-fellowship professional opportunities. Future research should examine the impact of high volume orthopaedic trauma volume and high patient-to-provider ratios on health outcomes.

There Is No Weekend Effect in the Trauma Patient.

BACKGROUND: The presence of a "weekend effect", that is, increased morbidity/mortality for patients admitted to the hospital on a weekend, has been reported in numerous studies across many specialties. Postulated causes include reduced weekend staffing, increased time between admission and undergoing procedures/surgery, and decreased subspecialty availability. The aim of this study is to evaluate if a "weekend effect" exists in trauma care in the United States. METHODS: Using the 2012-2015 National In-patient Sample database from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, adults with trauma diagnoses who were admitted nonelectively were analyzed. Using logistic and negative binomial regression adjusted for survey-related discharge weights and statistically significant covariables, mortality and length of stay (LOS) were assessed, respectively. Subgroup analysis was conducted using rural, urban teaching, and urban nonteaching hospital-type subgroups. Additional subgroup analysis of patients who required surgery during admission was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 22,451 patients were identified, with 3.94% admitted to rural and 81.42% to urban hospitals. Weekend admission did not have a statistically significant difference in adjusted-mortality (OR 0.928; 95% CI 0.858-1.003; P = 0.059) or LOS (IRR 0.978; 95% CI 0.945-1.011; P = 0.199). There was also no statistically significant increase in mortality or LOS for weekend admits in any of the hospital subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: There does not appear to be a weekend effect for trauma admission. This may be explained by the nature of trauma care in the United States, in which there is often 24-h in-house coverage regardless of day of the week. Replicating a trauma service coverage schedule may help other services decrease the presence of the weekend effect.

Impact of Insurance Expansion on Disposition for Pediatric Trauma Patients: A National Trauma Data Bank Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The insurance status of pediatric trauma patients is associated with access to post-discharge resources, including inpatient rehabilitation. Our goal was to understand the impact of changes in insurance coverage on access to post-acute care resources for pediatric trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We utilized the National Trauma Data Bank from 2012 to 2016 for all pediatric trauma patients with a highest body region abbreviated injury score >2. Our primary outcome was hospital discharge disposition location. We used multivariable regression to adjust for salient patient and trauma center characteristics. Additionally, we performed a sensitivity analysis including only high-volume hospitals to examine the relationship between the magnitude of facility level expansion in coverage and changes in patient disposition. RESULTS: We identified 195,649 pediatric trauma patients meeting inclusion criteria. From 2012 to 2016 the proportion of patients with Medicaid (35% versus 39%, P < 0.001) and private insurance (39% versus 45%, P < 0.001) increased. Increased discharges with home health (HH) (+0.6% adjusted risk difference 2012 to 2016, P < 0.001) and decreased discharges to inpatient rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities (-0.6% adjusted risk difference 2012 to 2016, P = 0.01) were associated with changes in insurance coverage. After stratifying high volume facilities by magnitude of increase in Medicaid and private insurance, we found that, for all groups, discharge to inpatient rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities decreased (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Expanded insurance coverage for children was paradoxically associated with decreased discharge to inpatient rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities after severe traumatic injury. These findings suggest that additional barriers may drive limitations in access to pediatric post-discharge services.