Coffee and conversation: A genuine dialogue on authentic professional learning between genetic counselor educators.

Lifelong learning is a term frequently referred to in the training and continuing professional development of genetic counselors. It implies the ability to continuously engage in self-motivated reflection to identify knowledge gaps and develop a learning plan to address identified needs or interests. In contrast to this definition, the path to continuing professional development for most genetic counselors involves attendance at conferences; yet much data suggest that other forms of learning are more effective at leading to practice change and improved patient or quality outcomes. These conflicting ideas beg the question: what is professional learning? A dialogue between two genetic counselor educators, both with advanced training in health professional education, shares personal beliefs regarding lifelong learning in the genetic counseling profession. This discourse represents an authentic conversation that was audio-recorded and transcribed with minimal editing to improve clarity and readability. The views presented in this dialogue are highly personal, yet grounded in educational theory. References are provided to those that desire further reading on the topics discussed. Several authentic learning strategies are described, including communities of practice, peer supervision, and personal learning projects. The authors consider ways to increase knowledge acquisition from conference attendance and discuss how learning on the job becomes embedded in practice. As a result of this discourse, the authors hope to inspire genetic counselors to reflect over their continuing professional development and consider their job as a learning environment that presents rich, ongoing, and unique opportunities for growth. The authors invite and challenge readers to identify learning needs and set goals for themselves to address those needs. For those with interest in education, it is hoped that the conversation sparks new or invigorated interest that will lead to novel or more effective learning opportunities with improved outcomes for patients, students, and colleagues alike.

Small programs, big challenges: Reimagining the evaluation of clinical teaching in genetic counseling.

Within the health professions education system, a significant proportion of teaching and learning occurs in the clinical setting. As such, the need to measure effective teaching for accreditation standards, faculty development, merit pay, academic promotion, and for monitoring the safety of the learning environment has led to numerous universities developing instruments to evaluate teaching effectiveness in this context. To date; however, these instruments typically focus on the student perspective, despite evidence demonstrating that student evaluations of teaching (SETs) lack correlation with learning outcomes and are not a true measure of teaching effectiveness. This issue is further exacerbated in small health professional training programs, such as genetic counseling, where clinical teachers may only supervise 1-3 students per year. As a result, not only are SETs more confounded due to small sample sizes, but a direct conflict exists between respecting learner anonymity and providing timely and relevant feedback to faculty. In such contexts, even using SETs to evaluate the nature of the learning environment may be unreliable due to student concerns about identifiability and fear of retaliation for unfavorable evaluation. This paper will review the literature regarding SETs, barriers to this process within the clinical setting, and the unintended downstream consequences. Options for addressing issues related to the use of SETs will be considered, with particular focus on the process of reflection and the use of teaching consultations or peer support groups as a means to improve teaching effectiveness in this learning environment.

Community perspectives on the use of electronic health data to support reflective practice by health professionals.

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records and other clinical information systems have crucial roles in health service delivery and are often utilised for patient care as well as health promotion and research. Government agencies and healthcare bodies are gradually shifting the focus on how these data systems can be harnessed for secondary uses such as reflective practice, professional learning and continuing professional development. Whilst there has been a presence in research around the attitudes of health professionals in employing clinical information systems to support their reflective practice, there has been very little research into consumer attitudes towards these data systems and how they would like to interact with such structures. The study described in this article aimed to address this gap in the literature by exploring community perspectives on the secondary use of Electronic Health Data for health professional learning and practice reflection. METHODS: A qualitative methodology was used, with data being collected via semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted via phone and audio recordings, before being transcribed into text for analysis. Reflective thematic analysis was undertaken to analyse the data. RESULTS: Fifteen Australians consented to participate in an interview. Analysis of interview data generated five themes: (1) Knowledge about health professional registration and professional learning; (2) Secondary uses of Electronic Health Data; (3) Factors that enable the use of Electronic Health Data for health professional learning; (4) Challenges using Electronic Health Data for health professional learning and (5) Expectations around consent to use Electronic Health Data for health professional learning. CONCLUSIONS: Australians are generally supportive of health professionals using Electronic Health Data to support reflective practice and learning but identify several challenges for data being used in this way.

Learning from our patients: An exploratory study to inform the development of a case tracking dashboard for internal medicine subspecialty fellows.

BACKGROUND: Case tracking (following-up prior patient encounters) can help inform future clinical decisions and supplement experiential learning. Internal medicine subspecialty fellows see a high volume of patients and need to become subject matter experts within a short time frame, yet little is known about their specific needs and motivations around case tracking. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore internal medicine subspecialty fellows' motivations, preferences, and practices around case tracking. METHODS: We conducted interviews with internal medicine subspecialty fellows at a single academic medical center during the 2022-2023 academic year. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: 22 fellows were interviewed for our study. We found that most fellows engaged in case tracking with lists in the electronic health record (EHR). Fellows primarily tracked cases of clinical uncertainty and patients with specific diseases or conditions of interest. Fellows sought information on patients' health outcomes, results, and clinical notes. Motivations for tracking were predominantly related to curiosity, professional growth, and development of practice patterns. Barriers to case tracking included time, challenges maintaining patient lists, losing track of patients, and lack of motivation to develop and maintain an organized system. CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine subspecialty fellows engaged in and valued case tracking as a way to supplement their experiential learning. Our study highlighted their current practices, motivations, preferences, and challenges related to case tracking. We plan to use these findings to help develop an EHR-embedded dashboard to facilitate case tracking among subspecialty fellows.

Towards a pedagogy for noticing: Piloting a novel intervention for health professions students.

Teaching students to 'notice' what is happening around them, to be more attuned to what is going on within themselves, and nurturing self-inquiry into one's practice is desirable yet difficult to achieve. We sought to teach the metacognitive skill of 'noticing' to pre-registration health professions students in the context of interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP). A three-part curriculum was designed: an e-module focused on 'noticing' in IPCP; a team-based workplace learning observation and interprofessional debrief; and a written reflective assignment. We found that students concentrated on the disciplinary content of IPCP in the assignments, which 'overshadowed' the metacognitive content. We learned that: we had underestimated the challenges of retrofitting new content into existing curricula; that we had not paid enough attention to students' perceptions about what they want to learn; and working with a large and diverse group of educators requires adequate preparation. The next iteration of this program will improve the constructive alignment between learning outcomes and assessments and provide better support for educators. In the future we will temper decisions to act quickly to implement curricular innovations. More broadly, we suggest that educational design that seeks to take account of qualitatively different but intersecting knowledge domains, such as IPCP and 'noticing', is worthy of further study.

Developing and testing a reflection method for implementation of the informal care guideline in community nursing: Design-based research.

AIM: To develop a reflection method for community nurses and certified nursing assistants to support the implementation of the Dutch Informal Care guideline in daily care. DESIGN: Design-based research. METHODS: A design group and four test groups of community nurses and nursing assistants were formed to develop a reflection method that aligns with the needs and preferences of its end-users. The design and test group meetings were video recorded. The video data were iteratively discussed and analysed thematically to adapt and refine the method and to identify its key features. RESULTS: A final reflection method was developed. Five main themes were identified from the analysis: the group, reflective triggers, knowledge about the guidelines, the coach and preconditions. The themes are linked to nine key features representing the building blocks of the reflection method. The key features are group size, participants with different (educational) backgrounds, pairs of participants, expressing thoughts, video feedback, reflection game, making the connection with the guideline, coaching as a process facilitator and meeting organizational and contextual conditions for implementation. CONCLUSION: An evidence- and practice-based reflection method for community nurses and certified nursing assistants is developed to support the implementation. By involving community nurses and certified nursing assistants, the method closely matches their needs and preferences. Critical elements of the reflection method are a game element, video feedback and working in pairs in a group of participants from different (educational) backgrounds. Guidance is needed to make the transfer from theory to practice. IMPACT: A reflection method for community nurses and certified nursing assistants was developed to enhance care work according to guideline recommendations, aiming to improve the care provided by informal caregivers. REPORT METHOD: The COREQ guideline was used. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This reflection method was developed in close collaboration with all stakeholders during the entire study.

Enhancing new graduate nurses and midwives person-centredness through clinical supervision during COVID-19; evaluation of a non-randomized intervention study.

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate a person-centred model of clinical supervision to enhance person-centredness. DESIGN: Experimental, quantitative. METHODS: One hundred and three New Graduates were supported to reflect through a person-centred lens (July-December 2020). Evaluation was undertaken at 6 months using: the Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale-26 (effectiveness of supervision) and the Person-centred Practice Inventory (measures attributes of the nurse/midwife, the care environment and person-centred processes). Due to participation difficulties, scores were calculated by attendance rates using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: Regular attendees scored higher on the supervision's effectiveness; however, this did not reach efficacy. 'Finding time' to attend contributed to low scores. Supervision scored well on its supportive function when attended. Many New Graduates perceived a decline in their care environment. Attendance aside, New Graduates averaged an increased in their person-centred attributes and processes. Greater participation was found in those who scored higher at baseline on their person-centred attributes and processes, and this higher scoring continued at 6 months than those who attended less. CONCLUSION: New Graduates who perceive themselves as person-centred and reflective at baseline are more likely to attend a person-centred clinical supervision and score higher at 6 months than those who attended less often. New Graduates found support within supervision during challenging times. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE FOR PROFESSIONAL AND/OR PATIENT CARE: For successful implementation of Person-centred Clinical Supervision, New Graduates need support to attend, as attendance supports them to begin seeing value in the process. IMPACT: This intervention kept person-centred practice at the forefront of New Graduates reflection, in a time of extreme change. The research has implications for nursing and midwifery management with the imperative to deliver person-centred care and create the person-centred cultures for staff to feel supported and empowered. REPORTING METHOD: Transparent Evaluation of Non-randomized Designs (TREND). PATIENT OF PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution. CONTRIBUTION TO WIDER COMMUNITY: New Graduates grow their person-centredness over their transitioning year; however, this can be enhanced with regular clinical supervision underpinned by person-centred theory. Clinical supervisors can provide support to New Graduates when the environment is challenged.

Reflect to interact - fostering medical students' communication through reflection-focused e-learning.

BACKGROUND: Previous research indicates that reflection can foster medical communication competence. However, best practices for embedding reflection in online medical education are missing. This study examined how reflection processes can be promoted and embedded in an e-learning course on physician-patient communication to foster learning. METHODS: We investigated three differently designed e-learning conditions featuring different proportions of reflection triggers and compared their effects on students' reflections. We had 114 medical students in their first clinical year complete one of the variants: video modelling (VM, n = 39), video reflection (VR, n = 39), or a variant merging both approaches (VMR, n = 36). Each student wrote a total of nine reflections based on the same guiding questions at three time points embedded in the course. The students' levels of reflection were measured using an adapted version of the REFLECT rubric (scale 0-18). RESULTS: Students of all course variants achieved good levels of reflection beyond the descriptive level at all three time points, with no significant differences between the variants. The mean reflection scores at the end of the course were M = 14.22 for VM (SD = 2.23), M = 13.56 for VR (SD = 2.48), and M = 13.24 for VMR (SD = 2.21). Students who completed VM showed significantly improved levels of reflection over the course, whereas we found no statistically significant development for those in VR or VMR. The reflection scores correlated significantly positively with each other, as did the text lengths of the written reflections. Reflection scores also correlated significantly positively with text length. CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers a teaching strategy that can foster good levels of reflection, as demonstrated in the three e-learning variants. The developed reflection prompts can be easily embedded in various e-learning environments and enable reflections of good quality, even in settings with limited available teaching time.

"You go in heavy and you come out light": An interpretative phenomenological analysis of reflective practice experiences in an Irish infant mental health setting.

Reflective practice (RP) is a core component of infant mental health (IMH); however, there is limited published empirical research on IMH practitioner experiences of RP. This two-stage, qualitative, multimodal study explored Irish IMH practitioners' experiences of RP spaces. Visual and verbal data from seven individual interviews and a participatory arts-based focus group with seven participants (eight participants in total, all white Irish females) were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Five group experiential themes (Just get on with it; What should I be bringing to this space?; Who are my "hands"?; Taking a step back; and You go in heavy and you come out light) were generated by the analysis. These were used to construct a developmental and experiential model of learning in an RP space. The themes portray how a practitioner's RP experience can change over time: influenced by prior experiences and practice development stage, practitioners move from initial uncertainty, anxiety, and perceived pressure in a busy workload to developing the trust and ability to be vulnerable in an RP space. Through relationships (supervisor/facilitator or group members), a shared safe space can be created, which addresses practitioners' needs for containment, allowing for experiential learning through a process of transformational moments.

La práctica con reflexión (RP) es un componente central de la salud mental infantil (IMH), sin embargo, existe una limitada investigación empírica publicada sobre las experiencias de RP de los profesionales de la práctica de IMH. Este estudio multimodal, cualitativo, en dos etapas, exploró las experiencias de los espacios de RP de profesionales irlandeses en la práctica de IMH. Se analizó la información visual y verbal de siete entrevistas individuales y un grupo de enfoque participativo con base artística de siete participantes (ocho participantes en total, todas mujeres blancas irlandesas) usando el Análisis Fenomenológico Interpretativo. El análisis generó cinco temas de la experiencia de grupo (Manos a la obra; ¿Qué debo aportar a este espacio?; ¿Quiénes son mis 'manos'?; Dar un paso atrás; y Se comienza pesado y se termina liviano). Estos temas se usaron para construir un modelo de desarrollo y experimental de aprendizaje dentro de un espacio de RP. Los temas describieron cómo la experiencia de RP de un profesional de la práctica puede cambiar a lo largo del tiempo: influida por experiencias previas y un estado de desarrollo práctico, los profesionales de la práctica pasan de la incertidumbre inicial, la ansiedad y la percibida presión dentro de una ocupada carga de trabajo a desarrollar la confianza y la habilidad de ser vulnerable dentro de un espacio de RP. A través de relaciones (supervisor/facilitador o miembros de grupo), se puede crear un espacio seguro compartido, el cual aborda las necesidades de contención de los profesionales de la práctica, permitiendo el aprendizaje experimental a través de un proceso de momentos transformacionales.

Reflective supervision and reflective practice in infant mental health: A scoping review of a diverse body of literature.

Reflective practice is a core component of Infant Mental Health (IMH) training and work in the form of reflective supervision/consultation (RS/C). RS/C supports and facilitates relationship-based practice, and is considered to help prevent burnout and promote work satisfaction. In response to an identified gap in empirical research on RS/C, this scoping review aimed to give an overview of the broad range of study designs and outcomes by systematically charting empirical studies on RS/C in IMH-based work with children and families. Searches of Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsychArticles, APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science were supplemented with a Google Scholar search and citation searching. Following title/abstract screening (n = 233) and full-text review (n = 168), 35 reports met criteria for inclusion. Key findings were organized into four categories: Essential components and processes of RS/C; Experiences and outcomes of RS/C; Emerging issues in RS/C literature; and Measuring, researching, and reporting on RS/C. Results describe the components and experience of engaging in quality RS/C, and show that practitioners generally experience RS/C as supportive and beneficial. The existing literature has some methodological limitations and further empirical research is needed on outcomes of RS/C. Practice implications and potential future research directions are discussed.

La práctica con reflexión es un componente central del entrenamiento y trabajo en el campo de Salud Mental Infantil (IMH), en forma de una supervisión/consulta con reflexión (RS/C). RS/C apoya y facilita la práctica que tiene como base la relación y se considera que ayuda a prevenir el agotamiento y a promover la satisfacción en el trabajo. Como respuesta a un identificado vacío en la investigación empírica sobre RS/C, esta revisión de los antecedentes se propuso presentar una visión general de la amplia gama de diseños y resultados de estudios por medio de un trazado sistemático de estudios empíricos sobre RS/C en el trabajo basado en IMH con niños y familias. La búsqueda en Academic Search Complete (Completa Búsqueda Académica), en CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA, PsychArticles, APA PsycInfo y Web of Science (Red de la Ciencia) se suplementó con una búsqueda en Google Scholar y una búsqueda de citas anotadas. Después de seguir la detección de título/resumen (n = 233) y una revisión del texto completo (n = 168), 35 reportes reunieron los criterios para ser incluidos. Los resultados claves se organizaron en 4 categorías: Componentes y procesos esenciales de RS/C; Experiencias y resultados de RS/C; Asuntos incipientes en la literatura sobre RS/C; y Medir, investigar y reportar sobre RS/C. Los resultados describen los componentes y experiencias de participar en RS/C de calidad, y muestran que los profesionales de la práctica generalmente experimentan RS/C como un proceso de apoyo y beneficioso. La literatura existente tiene algunas limitaciones metodológicas y se necesita una mayor investigación empírica sobre los resultados de RS/C. Se discuten las implicaciones en la práctica y las potenciales directrices para la futura investigación.

Decolonising dental educational research: reflections from a white researcher.

While there is an emerging scholarship on decolonising dentistry, the debate about reflexivity, positionality and white privilege in dental educational research and practice is still at a developmental stage. This article aims to contribute to this nascent debate by contemplating the question- is it appropriate, or possible, for a white researcher to undertake decolonisation work in dental education? If so, what would it entail or 'look' like? To answer this important question, the author offers a reflective account of their ethical and epistemological journey with this very question. This journey begins with how I, a white researcher, first became aware of the everyday racism experienced by my racially and ethnically minoritized students, the whiteness of dental educational spaces and how my white privilege and position as a dental educator consciously and unconsciously implicated me in these processes of exclusion and discrimination. While this revelation led to a personal commitment to do better in my practice, both as an educator and a researcher, I continue to struggle with my white ignorance and white fragility as I strive to make my work more inclusive. To illustrate this, I discuss an ethnodrama project on everyday racism that I lead on and how, despite choosing a more democratic research method, hegemonic whiteness continued to make its presence felt through my 'going it alone' method of work. This reflective account reaffirms that regular and routine self-reflection is key to ensuring that racialised inappropriate and damaging assumptions, frameworks of thinking, and ways of working are checked for. However, my praxis won't evolve through critical introspection alone. I need to be open to making mistakes, educating myself about racism and anti-racist practice, asking for help and guidance from my minoritized colleagues and more importantly, committing to working with people from minoritized communities rather than on them.

Teaching critical reflection in health professions education with transformative-vygotskian praxis.

Reflective practice is a complex concept to adequately describe, communicate about and, ultimately, teach. Unrelieved tensions about the concept persist within the health professions education (HPE) literature owing to reflection's diverse theoretical history. Tensions extend from the most basic, e.g., what is reflection and what are its contents, to the complex, e.g., how is reflection performed and whether it should be evaluated. Nonetheless, reflection is generally seen as vital to HPE, because it imparts crucial strategies and awareness to learners in their professional practices. In this article, we explore both conceptual and pedagogical dimensions of teaching for reflection. We address the concept of reflection, its application to practice, and how to remain faithful to transformative, critical pedagogy when teaching for it. We present (a) an analysis of two theories of education in HPE: Transformative Learning and Vygotskian Cultural Historical Theory. We (b) outline a pedagogical approach that applies Piotr Gal'perin's SCOBA: schema for the complete orienting basis of an action. We then employ (a) and (b) to provide affordances for developing materials for educational interventions across HPE contexts.

Thought Leader Perspectives on the Benefits, Barriers, and Enablers for Routinely Collected Electronic Health Data to Support Professional Development: Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals routinely collect large amounts of administrative data such as length of stay, 28-day readmissions, and hospital-acquired complications; yet, these data are underused for continuing professional development (CPD). First, these clinical indicators are rarely reviewed outside of existing quality and safety reporting. Second, many medical specialists view their CPD requirements as time-consuming, having minimal impact on practice change and improving patient outcomes. There is an opportunity to build new user interfaces based on these data, designed to support individual and group reflection. Data-informed reflective practice has the potential to generate new insights about performance, bridging the gap between CPD and clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to understand why routinely collected administrative data have not yet become widely used to support reflective practice and lifelong learning. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews (N=19) with thought leaders from a range of backgrounds, including clinicians, surgeons, chief medical officers, information and communications technology professionals, informaticians, researchers, and leaders from related industries. Interviews were thematically analyzed by 2 independent coders. RESULTS: Respondents identified visibility of outcomes, peer comparison, group reflective discussions, and practice change as potential benefits. The key barriers included legacy technology, distrust with data quality, privacy, data misinterpretation, and team culture. Respondents suggested recruiting local champions for co-design, presenting data for understanding rather than information, coaching by specialty group leaders, and timely reflection linked to CPD as enablers to successful implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was consensus among thought leaders, bringing together insights from diverse backgrounds and medical jurisdictions. We found that clinicians are interested in repurposing administrative data for professional development despite concerns with underlying data quality, privacy, legacy technology, and visual presentation. They prefer group reflection led by supportive specialty group leaders, rather than individual reflection. Our findings provide novel insights into the specific benefits, barriers, and benefits of potential reflective practice interfaces based on these data sets. They can inform the design of new models of in-hospital reflection linked to the annual CPD planning-recording-reflection cycle.

'What is it we are trying to achieve here'? Community maternal and child health nurses and clinical supervision: A qualitative descriptive study.

AIMS: To explore clinical supervision practice by Victorian Maternal and Child Health nurses, identify the self-reported supervision needs of nurses and the facilitators and barriers to meeting those needs. BACKGROUND: Community-based Maternal and Child Health nurses have responsibilities for the safety and wellbeing of children and specific clinical support needs. Clinical supervision has the potential to support nurses' clinical practice and reflective skills; however, little is known internationally about child and family health nurses' supervision practices. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study. METHODS: Twenty-three semi-structured interviews were conducted between October and December 2021 with nurses, managers and supervisors across metropolitan, regional/rural areas of Victoria, Australia. Inductive thematic analysis was applied to the data. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guided this study. RESULTS: Three main themes, with subthemes were generated; 'Understand what we do', 'It's the gathering of the nurses' and 'Bringing a case'. A lack of agreed purpose, aims and varied understandings of clinical supervision contributed to suboptimal clinical supervision. Although participants agreed about the importance of clinical supervision, the perceived benefits were inconsistently realized. CONCLUSIONS: This study points to a need for greater organizational awareness of the conditions and leadership needed to build reflective skills and culture in community-based child and family nursing. REPORTING METHOD: The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research has guided this study. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There was no patient or public contribution in the conduct of this study. IMPACT: A stronger focus is needed to build reflective culture and skill in child and family nursing. Areas for improving child and family nurses' use of clinical supervision have been identified. This study can inform nurse education, policy and service leaders, to strengthen clinical supervision in child and family nursing contexts.

Written reflective practice abilities of SLT students across the degree programme.

BACKGROUND: Written reflective practice (WRP) is a teaching tool used across speech-language therapy (SLT) clinical education programmes. The process aims to support the development of reflective skills required for the workplace (e.g., problem-solving and self-evaluation). AIMS: This cross-sectional and repeated-measures study design investigated students' demonstration of breadth of WRP across the clinical education programme. METHODS & PROCEDURES: The participants were 77 undergraduate SLT students in their first, second or final professional year of the clinical programme. Participants wrote critical reflections following an interaction with a client/s as part of their clinical education experiences. Formative feedback was provided after each written reflection (WR). In total four WRs per participant were coded for breadth of WRP using a modification of Plack et al.'s coding schema from 2005. This was completed for each of the four time points across the academic year for each professional year. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: There was a statistically significant association between time (i.e., professional year of the programme) and likelihood of demonstration of breadth of reflection for the lower level reflective element of 'attend' and higher level reflective element of 're-evaluate'. A positive trend between time and likelihood of demonstration of breadth of reflection was seen for the lower level element of 'reflection-for-action'. Final-professional-year students exhibited significant enhancements in the higher level elements (e.g., 'premise') compared with first- and second-professional-year students. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: This group of SLT students exhibited significant change in breadth of WRP across the degree programme. This finding has positive implications for facilitating WRP with students and using the current coding framework in clinical programmes. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject WRP is one form of reflective practice (RP) used in SLT, allied health, medical and nursing clinical education programmes. Researchers have suggested that RP skills develop over time for students. Previously, studies examining WRP have focused on one off assessment of skill or over a timeframe of 6-10 weeks. Here, we examine SLT students' WRP skills across the degree programme. What this paper adds to existing knowledge SLT students exhibited significant positive change in breadth of WRP across the degree programme as their clinical experience increased. Our results provide quantitative information in support of using RP as a learning tool throughout clinical education programmes for SLT. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This study offers support for educators of SLT students; for example, how educators can assess WRP, and how educators can foster SLT student skill development with formative feedback and reflective questioning. This study also offers support for student SLT, for example, describing how WRP can be part of their individualized learning approach and provide a purposeful examination of self and clinical skill development.

Measuring deliberate reflection in residents: validation and psychometric properties of a measurement tool.

PURPOSE: Reflective capacity is "the ability to understand critical analysis of knowledge and experience to achieve deeper meaning." In medicine, there is little provision for post-graduate medical education to teach deliberate reflection. The feasibility, scoring characteristics, reliability, validation, and adaptability of a modified previously validated instrument was examined for its usefulness assessing reflective capacity in residents as a step toward developing interventions for improvement. METHODS: Third-year residents and fellows from four anesthesia training programs were administered a slightly modified version of the Reflection Evaluation for Learners' Enhanced Competencies Tool (REFLECT) in a prospective, observational study at the end of the 2019 academic year. Six written vignettes of imperfect anesthesia situations were created. Subjects recorded their perspectives on two randomly assigned vignettes. Responses were scored using a 5-element rubric; average scores were analyzed for psychometric properties. An independent self-report assessment method, the Cognitive Behavior Survey: Residency Level (rCBS) was used to examine construct validity. Internal consistency (ICR, Cronbach's alpha) and interrater reliability (weighted kappa) were examined. Pearson correlations were used between the two measures of reflective capacity. RESULTS: 46/136 invited subjects completed 2/6 randomly assigned vignettes. Interrater agreement was high (k = 0.85). The overall average REFLECT score was 1.8 (1-4 scale) with good distribution across the range of scores. ICR for both the REFLECT score (mean 1.8, sd 0.5; α = 0.92) and the reflection scale of the rCBS (mean 4.5, sd 1.1; α = 0.94) were excellent. There was a significant correlation between REFLECT score and the rCBS reflection scale (r = .44, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates feasibility, reliability, and sufficiently robust psychometric properties of a modified REFLECT rubric to assess graduate medical trainees' reflective capacity and established construct/convergent validity to an independent measure. The instrument has the potential to assess the effectiveness of interventions intended to improve reflective capacity.

Exploring the therapeutic relationship through the reflective practice of nurses in acute mental health units: A qualitative study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the therapeutic relationship through the reflective practice of nurses in acute mental health units. BACKGROUND: In mental health units, the therapeutic relationship is especially relevant for increasing the effectiveness of nursing interventions. Reflective practice is considered an essential aspect for improving nursing care. DESIGN: Action and observation stages of a participatory action research project. METHODS: Data were collected through reflective diaries designed for the guided description and reflection of practice interactions related to the therapeutic relationship and content analysis was applied. A total of 152 nurses from 18 acute mental health units participated. The COREQ guidelines were used. RESULTS: The results were classified into three categories as follows: (i) Nursing attitude as a core of the therapeutic relationship. For the nurses, the attitudinal component was key in the therapeutic relationship. (ii) Nursing practices that are essential to the therapeutic relationship. Nurses identified practices such as creating a conducive environment, using an appropriate verbal approach, offering help and working together with the patient as essential for establishing a therapeutic relationship in practice. (iii) Contextual factors affecting the therapeutic relationship. The nurses considered the patient's condition, the care dynamics of the unit and its regulations, as well as the structure and environment of the unit, as contextual factors involved the establishment of an adequate therapeutic relationship in daily clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: This study has provided knowledge of the importance and role of the nurses' attitude in the context of the nurse-patient therapeutic relationship based on the reflections of nurses in mental health units regarding their own practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: These findings help nurses to increase awareness and develop improvement strategies based on their own knowledge and day-to-day difficulties. Moreover, managers can evaluate strategies that promote motivation and facilitate the involvement of nurses to improve the therapeutic relationship with patients.

Nurse-led shared decision-making on complementary therapy use by patients with diabetes: An participatory action research.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to develop, implement and evaluate a nurse-led shared decision-making model of care for discussing the use of complementary and alternative medicine with diabetic patients and to explore to what extent the risk-benefit assessment of using complementary and alternative medicine can provide a framework for facilitating nurse-patient dialogue and strengthening patient involvement in their disease management. DESIGN: Participatory action research with pre-post intervention. METHODS: A two-run cycle of action and spirals from participatory action research was undertaken using a purposive sampling method to involve healthcare professionals and diabetic patients from September 2021 to June 2022. The nurse-led shared decision-making model of care was designed and implemented congruent with participatory action research principles. Quantitative measures were collected about patients' perceived involvement in shared decision-making and their understanding of the risks and benefits of using complementary and alternative medicine. Patients' outcomes of disease control (fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c) were also collected. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS software (version 28). Interviews were summarized using thematic analysis. An EQUATOR Network guideline for participatory action research supported the preparation of this paper. RESULTS: Comparison of pre-post intervention outcomes showed that patients' scale scores on shared decision-making involvement and understanding of the risk-benefit of using complementary and alternative medicine improved significantly after implementing the model. Fasting plasma glucose improved only slightly after a 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The care model strengthens patient involvement in their disease management and makes appropriate decisions about CAM use that should reduce potentially harmful side effects or interactions between CAM and conventional medicine. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: The shared decision-making model of care incorporates evidence-based CAM research into practice, facilitates the standardization of CAM management in diabetes, improves care options for patients and educates nurses about CAM use in managing diabetes. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Undergraduate nursing students' experiences of practicing caring behaviours with standardised patients.

RATIONALE: Undergraduate nursing students' learning opportunities to practice caring behaviours to assure compassionate and competent nursing practice with standardised patients are few. Earlier studies primarily focused on practicing communication skills in relation to mental health or developing psychomotor skills while caring for a patient with a specific diagnosis. AIM: The study aim was to describe undergraduate nursing students' experiences of practicing caring behaviours with a standardised patient. METHOD: A sample of forty-eight undergraduate nursing students in semester four at a school of nursing in southern Sweden, enrolled in a full-time, 5-week, on-campus elective caring behaviour course, were at the first and last week individually video-recorded during two caring behaviour simulations encountering a standardised patient. After observing each of their video-recordings, students completed written reflections focusing on their own compassionate and competent verbal and nonverbal caring behaviour. In total, 96 individual written reflections were analysed using qualitative content analysis to describe the experience. RESULTS: One main theme emerged: The challenge of being mindfully present in patient encounters. Four themes further described the experience: A challenging but realistic learning experience, learning the impact of nonverbal behaviour, recognising the complexity of verbal behaviour, and learning to be with the patient instead of only doing for the patient. CONCLUSION: When caring is intertwined with visible and realistic nursing practice in simulations using standardised patients it facilitates undergraduate nursing students learning compassionate and competent caring behaviour. The learning experience opened the students' eyes to the impact of practicing caring, recognising that being with is not the same as doing for the patient, and thus, how challenging it is to be mindfully present in patient encounters. Designing caring behaviour simulations with standardised patients is a feasible and efficacious educational learning didactic to facilitate students' learning caring behaviour and enhancing patients' experiences.

Problem-based learning versus reflective practice on nursing students' moral sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Moral sensitivity is one of the prerequisites for nurses' professional competency and patient care. It is critical to teach professional ethics in a student-centered manner in order to increase students' moral sensibility. This study evaluated the effects of professional ethics education via problem-based learning and reflective practice on nursing students' moral sensitivity. METHODS: This experimental study was performed on 74 nursing students who were randomly divided into three groups of problem-based learning, reflective practice and control. Principles of professional ethics were presented for the two intervention groups in four 2-hour sessions using ethical dilemmas scenarios. Participants completed the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire before, immediately, and three months after the intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS16. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics of the three groups were similar (p > 0.05). The total moral sensitivity score significantly differed between the groups immediately and three months after the intervention (p < 0.001). The total mean score for moral sensitivity was significantly different between the two groups of problem-based learning and reflective practice, with the mean scores in the problem-based learning group being higher (p = 0.02). The mean score of moral sensitivity decreased statistically significantly in both experimental groups three months after the intervention as compared to immediately after the intervention (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Nursing students' moral sensitivity can be increased through reflective practice and problem-based learning. While the results indicated that problem-based learning was more successful than reflective practice, additional research is recommended to confirm the influence of these two strategies on moral sensitivity.