Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 312
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 199, 2024 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886654

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Perforated peptic ulcer is the worst complication of peptic ulcer disease whose burden is disproportionately higher in low-income settings. However, there is paucity of published data on the patterns of perforated peptic ulcer in the region. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with anatomical patterns of peptic ulcer perforation, as well as the clinical, socio-demographic, and anatomical patterns among patients in Uganda. METHODS: This was a cross sectional study that enrolled 81 consecutive patients with perforated peptic ulcers. Using a structured pretested questionnaire the social demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained. At surgery, the patterns of the perforations were determined. Logistic regression was done in SPSS version 22 to determine the factors associated with the anatomical patterns. RESULTS: Perforated peptic ulcer disease was more prevalent among males (79.5%), peasants (56.8%) and those from rural areas (65.4%). Majority of study participants were of blood group O (43.2%). Gastric perforations were more common (74.1%). Majority of the perforations were found anteriorly (81.5%). Being a casual laborer was independently associated with lower odds of having a gastric perforation compared to being a peasant farmer (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Public health campaigns aimed at prevention of peptic ulcer perforations should prioritize the males, peasants and those living in rural areas. When a patient in our setting is suspected to have a peptic ulcer perforation, the anterior part of the stomach should be considered as the most likely site involved more so in peasant farmers.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera Péptica Perforada , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Uganda/epidemiología , Femenino , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Prevalencia , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Factores Sexuales , Úlcera Gástrica/epidemiología , Adolescente
2.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 119(4): 404-416, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39250610

RESUMEN

Background: The incidence of peptic ulcers has decreased during the last decades; the COVID-19 pandemic may have influenced the peptic ulcer hospitalizations. The study aimed to assess the admissions and mortality for complicated and uncomplicated peptic ulcers and the influence of the pandemic period. Material and Methods: We performed an observational study at a tertiary academic center, including all patients admitted for peptic ulcers between 2017-2021. We evaluated the admissions for complicated and uncomplicated ulcers and risk factors for mortality. Results: 1416 peptic ulcers were admitted, with an equal proportion of gastric and duodenal ulcers; most patients were admitted for bleeding (66.7%), and perforation (17.3%). We noted a decreasing trend for peptic bleeding ulcer (PUB) and uncomplicated ulcer admissions during 2020-2021, while for perforation no significant variation was recorded; a decreasing mortality in PUB was noted from 2017 to 2020. Admissions for bleeding peptic ulcer have decreased by 36.6% during the pandemic period; the mortality rate was similar. Admissions for perforated peptic ulcer have decreased by 14.4%, with a higher mortality rate during the pandemic period (16.83 versus 6.73%). Conclusion: A decreasing trend for PUB admissions but not for perforated ulcers was noted. Admissions for PUB have decreased by more than 1/3 during the pandemic period, with a similar mortality rate. Admissions for perforated peptic ulcers have decreased by 1/7, with significantly higher mortality rates during the pandemic period.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica , Úlcera Péptica Perforada , Úlcera Péptica , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Úlcera Péptica/mortalidad , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/mortalidad , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/mortalidad , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Rumanía/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Úlcera Duodenal/mortalidad , Úlcera Duodenal/complicaciones , Úlcera Duodenal/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Úlcera Gástrica/mortalidad , Úlcera Gástrica/epidemiología , Incidencia , Pandemias , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano de 80 o más Años
3.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 73(7): 1506-1510, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37469068

RESUMEN

Duodenal ulcer perforation, a frequent surgical emergency, needs simple closure with indirect Graham's Omentopexy which is effective with excellent results in majority of cases despite patients' late presentation. The objective of the study was to determine the frequency of postoperative complications of perforated duodenal ulcer, conducted in the Surgery Department, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, from March 20, 2018 to September 20, 2018. The study was a descriptive case series of 108 patients of both genders with perforated duodenal ulcer > 1 week old with ASA score I & II. Patients with trauma and comorbidities were excluded. The patients underwent laparotomy and peritoneal toilet, and after noting the site of perforation indirect Graham's Omentopexy was performed. Complications like duodenal fistula, peritonitis, and paralytic ileus, and patient's death within 10 days of surgery were noted. Age ranged from 18 to 50 years with mean age of 35.027±5.13 years, mean weight 71.120±12.77 kg, mean height 1.541 ±0.09 metres, mean BMI 29.975±4.99 kg/m2, and the mean duration of complaint was 4.194±1.30 weeks. Male predominance in 75 (69.4%) patients. Duodenal fistula was seen in 10 (9.3%) patients, peritonitis 12 (11.1%), paralytic ileus 14 (13%) and mortality was in 11 (10.2%) patients.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera Duodenal , Fístula , Úlcera Péptica Perforada , Peritonitis , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Lactante , Úlcera Duodenal/complicaciones , Úlcera Duodenal/epidemiología , Úlcera Duodenal/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/complicaciones , Peritonitis/complicaciones
4.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 116(2): 296-305, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33105195

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) has been decreasing over time with Helicobacter pylori eradication and use of acid-suppressing therapies. However, PUD remains a common cause of hospitalization in the United States. We aimed to evaluate contemporary national trends in the incidence, treatment patterns, and outcomes for PUD-related hospitalizations and compare care delivery by hospital rurality. METHODS: Data from the National Inpatient Sample were used to estimate weighted annual rates of PUD-related hospitalizations. Temporal trends were evaluated by joinpoint regression and expressed as annual percent change with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We determined the proportion of hospitalizations requiring endoscopic and surgical interventions, stratified by clinical presentation and rurality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: There was a 25.8% reduction (P < 0.001) in PUD-related hospitalizations from 2005 to 2014, although the rate of decline decreased from -7.2% per year (95% CI: 13.2% to -0.7%) before 2008 to -2.1% per year (95% CI: 3.0% to -1.1%) after 2008. In-hospital mortality was 2.4% (95% CI: 2.4%-2.5%). Upper endoscopy (84.3% vs 78.4%, P < 0.001) and endoscopic hemostasis (26.1% vs 16.8%, P < 0.001) were more likely to be performed in urban hospitals, whereas surgery was performed less frequently (9.7% vs 10.5%, P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, patients managed in urban hospitals were at higher risk for postoperative morbidity (odds ratio 1.16 [95% CI: 1.04-1.29]), but not death (odds ratio 1.11 [95% CI: 1.00-1.23]). DISCUSSION: The rate of decline in hospitalization rates for PUD has stabilized over time, although there remains significant heterogeneity in treatment patterns by hospital rurality.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/tendencias , Hospitales Rurales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Úlcera Duodenal/epidemiología , Úlcera Duodenal/terapia , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Hemostasis Endoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/terapia , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/terapia , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Úlcera Gástrica/epidemiología , Úlcera Gástrica/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 22(1): 548, 2021 Jun 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34134676

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To determine how perforated peptic ulcers be diagnosed earlier after patients undergoing an elective spine surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective spine surgeries at our hospital between January 2000 and April 2018 and experienced an acute perforated peptic ulcer were included. An age-and gender-matched control group was comprised of 26 patients without a postoperative acute perforated peptic ulcer who received spine surgery during the same period. Medical records and imaging studies were thoroughly reviewed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled in the study group, including eight females and five males. Three patients, two females and one male, died of uncontrolled peritonitis during the hospital stay. All patients in the study group experienced the sudden onset of abdominal pain, which was continuous and progressively worsening. Patients with elevated serum amylase, a peptic ulcer history and increased intraoperative blood loss had a tendency to develop a postoperative perforated peptic ulcer. CONCLUSION: Spine surgeons should be highly alert to these risk factors of postoperative perforated peptic ulcers inpatients who has history of peptic ulcer, large amount ofintraoperative blood loss and abnormal high serum amylase level after elective spine surgery. Early diagnosis and emergent surgical intervention promote better outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera Péptica Perforada , Úlcera Péptica , Enfermedad Aguda , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/diagnóstico , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/etiología
6.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 35(4): 473-477, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30448888

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the pathogenesis, symptoms and individualized surgical management in pediatrics with gastroduodenal perforation (GDP). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with GDP from January 2013 to December 2016 in our hospital were collected and divided into gastric perforation (GP) group and duodenal perforation (DP) group. Demographics, clinical events, etiological factors, symptoms, the time from symptom onset to operation, intraoperative findings and surgical procedures were analyzed. Follow-ups including ulcer, perforations occurrence, and digestive symptoms were carried out by out-patient review or telephones. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients aged from 3 months to 14 years were enrolled in this study. The average age, main clinical presentations, size of perforations and operating time between two groups had no difference. The male to female ratio in DP group was higher than GP (P < 0.05). The high risk factor for DP was the use of dexamethasone, and for GP was HP infection. The most common site of perforation in DP group was duodenal bulb, and in GP group was pylorus area. Simple suture is the main management for both DP and GP, but distal gastrectomy combined with gastrojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis may be an alternative procedure for large perforation with diameter > 2 cm. The length of hospital days in GP group is shorter than DP group (P < 0.05). For follow-up, no patients had digestive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The general condition had no difference between GP and DP patients. But the risk factors and surgical repair differ depending on the patient's fundamental illness and the complexity of the perforation.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera Duodenal/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Úlcera Gástrica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , China/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Úlcera Duodenal/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Úlcera Gástrica/cirugía
7.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 88(2): 242-250.e1, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29233672

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Helicobacter pylori is associated with peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. Therefore we wanted to test how various lengths of delays in H pylori eradication therapy influence the risk of recurrent peptic ulcer, ulcer adverse events, and gastric cancer. METHODS: This population-based nationwide Swedish cohort study included 29,032 patients receiving H pylori eradication therapy after peptic ulcer disease in 2005 to 2013. Predefined time intervals between date of peptic ulcer diagnosis and date of eradication therapy were analyzed in relation to study outcomes. Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, history of ulcer disease, use of ulcerogenic drugs, and use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). RESULTS: Compared with eradication therapy within 7 days of peptic ulcer diagnosis, eradication therapy within 8 to 30, 31 to 60, 61 to 365, and >365 days corresponded with HRs of recurrent ulcer of 1.17 (95% CI, 1.08-1.25), 2.37 (95% CI, 2.16-2.59), 2.96 (95% CI, 2.76-3.16), and 3.55 (95% CI, 3.33-3.79), respectively. The corresponding HRs for complicated ulcer were 1.55 (95% CI, 1.35-1.78), 3.19 (95% CI, 2.69-3.78), 4.00 (95% CI, 3.51-4.55), and 6.14, (95% CI, 5.47-6.89), respectively. For gastric cancer the corresponding HRs were .85 (95% CI, .32-2.23), 1.31 (95% CI, .31-5.54), 3.64 (95% CI, 1.55-8.56), and 4.71 (95% CI, 2.36-9.38), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Delays in H pylori eradication therapy after peptic ulcer diagnosis time-dependently increase the risk of recurrent ulcer, even more so for complicated ulcer, starting from delays of 8 to 30 days.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Úlcera Gástrica/microbiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/etiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/etiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Recurrencia , Úlcera Gástrica/complicaciones , Suecia/epidemiología
8.
Tunis Med ; 96(7): 424-429, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30430486

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has become the gold standard for many procedures owing to its advantages such as a shorter post-operative stay, a faster recovery and less postoperative pain. However, choosing laparoscopic approach in an emergency situationsuch as in the management of a perforated duodenal peptic ulcer is still debated because of the absence of significant benefits. This study aimed to assess the management of perforated duodenal peptic ulcer treated by suture. METHODS: It's a retrospective study enrolling 81 patients operated on for duodenal perforated peptic ulcer between June 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2016 who underwent surgery in the surgical department B of Charles Nicolle's Hospital. RESULTS: Our retrospective study showed that laparoscopic approach had shorter post-operative duration (3 [1-5] versus 4 [1-16] days, respectively, p< 0.001), shorter mortality rate (3% versus 19%, p=0.032) and more uneventful post-operative course (97% versus 74%, p=0.004) comparing to the open approach. Patients who were not admitted in the intensive care unit during the first 48 hours had 9.901 more chance to be operated by laparoscopic approach. Patients who were operated on by a senior had 3.240 times more chance to be operated by laparoscopic approach. There was no predictive variable for conversion. Mortality rate was 11%. Age was the only predictive independent factor of mortality with a cut-off point of 47 years. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic approach is routinely practised in the perforated duodenal ulcer. In our study, we showed that laparoscopic approach had less post-operative complications, a lower rate of mortality and a shorter post-operative duration comparing to the open approach. The main limitation of our study was non-randomization and lack of laparoscopic expertise. The decision for either open or laparoscopic approach was then dependent on senior surgeon's availability.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Úlcera Duodenal/complicaciones , Úlcera Duodenal/cirugía , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Suturas , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Úlcera Duodenal/epidemiología , Duodeno/patología , Duodeno/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversos , Suturas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 26(10): 1141-1148, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28370857

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of gastrointestinal perforation, ulcers, or bleeding (PUB) associated with the use of conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and selective COX-2 inhibitors, with or without PPIs compared with conventional NSAIDs. METHODS: A case-control study was performed within conventional NSAIDs and/or selective COX-2 inhibitors users identified from the Dutch PHARMO Record Linkage System in the period 1998-2012. Cases were patients aged ≥18 years with a first hospital admission for PUB. For each case, up to four controls were matched for age and sex at the date a case was hospitalized (index date). Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: At the index date, 2634 cases and 5074 controls were current users of conventional NSAIDs or selective COX-2 inhibitors. Compared with conventional NSAIDs, selective COX-2 inhibitors with PPIs had the lowest risk of PUB (adjusted OR 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.73) followed by selective COX-2 inhibitors (adjusted OR 0.66, 95%CI: 0.48-0.89) and conventional NSAIDs with PPIs (adjusted OR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.68-0.92). Compared with conventional NSAIDs, the risk of PUB was lower for those aged ≥75 years taking conventional NSAIDs with PPIs compared with younger patients (adjusted interaction OR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.64-0.99). However, those aged ≥75 years taking selective COX-2 inhibitors, the risk was higher compared with younger patients (adjusted interaction OR 1.22, 95%CI: 1.01-1.47). CONCLUSIONS: Selective COX-2 inhibitors with PPIs, selective COX-2 inhibitors, and conventional NSAIDs with PPIs were associated with lower risks of PUB compared with conventional NSAIDs. These effects were modified by age. © 2017 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa 2/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Manejo del Dolor/efectos adversos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiología , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Úlcera Péptica/inducido químicamente , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica/prevención & control , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/etiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Trop Gastroenterol ; 36(4): 256-60, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27509704

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The major complications of peptic ulcer are hemorrhage, perforation and gastric outlet obstruction with perforation occurring in about 2-10% of patients. Patients with perforated peptic ulcer still have a high rate of morbidity and mortality and to improve the outcomes it is important to stratify the patients into different categories. AIMS: To evaluate the accuracy of Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients operated for peptic perforation. METHODS: It was a prospective observational single centre study conducted at SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, from October 2011 to October 2012 on 180 patients undergoing open surgery for peptic ulcer perforation. Postoperative outcomes in terms of recovery and complications were studied. For prediction of morbidity and mortality by Boey risk stratification, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of each risk score were compared with the outcomes of "0" risk score. RESULTS: The mortality rate increased progressively with increasing numbers of the Boey score: 1.9%, 7.1%, 31.7% and 40% for 0, 1, 2, and 3 scores, respectively (p < 0.001). The morbidity rates for 0, 1, 2, and 3 Boey scores were 13%, 45.7%, 70.7% and 73.3% respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Boey score is a useful tool for assessing the prognosis of operated cases of peptic perforation and helps in the assessment of mortality and morbidity of these patients.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Peritonitis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Choque/epidemiología , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Oportunidad Relativa , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Peritonitis/epidemiología , Peritonitis/etiología , Neumonía/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Factores de Riesgo , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
11.
Ethiop Med J ; 53(1): 19-24, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26591288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The term acute abdomen denotes any sudden spontaneous non traumatic disorder whose main manifestation is in the abdominal area. It is one of the most commonly encountered emergencies in the practice of general surgery but there is no much study regarding the magnitude and pattern in Ethiopia and in the study area in particular. OBJECTIVE: The study was aimed at assessing the causes, pattern and outcomes of surgical regimen of acute abdomen in the study area. METHODS: This is a descriptive retrospective study conducted in all adult patients with acute abdomen admitted in Mekelle hospital from Sept, 2008 to August, 2010. Patient demographics, clinical features, white cell count levels, operative findings and outcomes were adequately recorded. Adequate recording has been maintained in the hospital. The source.and the study groups (N-299) were patients of adult age categories. RESULTS: A total of 2628 surgical procedures were performed during the study period. Of these, 299 cases were surgical emergency conditions for acute abdomen accounting for (11.4%) of all surgeries. During the. study period, there were 989 adult surgical emergency procedures of which 299 (30.2%) cases were laparotomies for acute abdomen. The age ranged from 15 years to 95 years (mean = 31.5 years). The male to female ratio was (M: F; 4.1:1). In this series, the most common symptoms were abdominal pain, vomiting and abdominal distention accounting for 299 (100.0%), 149 (49.8%) and 38 (16.4%) respectively. The frequent. clinical signs were tenderness, localized guarding and rebound tenderness accounting for 287 (96.0%), 269 (90.0%) and 139 (46.4%) respectively. Acute abdomen was most common between 20-29 years of age at a rate of 96 (32.1%) with male 74 (24.7%) preponderance. Acute appendicitis was the leading cause of acute abdomen accounting for 159 (53.2%) followed by small bowel obstruction 48 (16.0%), sigmoid volvulus 38 (12.7%) and PPUD 13 (4.3%). Of the surgically treated patients for acute abdomen 92 (30.8%) had post-operative complications other than deaths. The three commonest immediate post-operative complications observed were wound infection (19.7%), pneumonia (9.0%) and sepsis (2.0%). In this series, there were 19 deaths giving an overall mortality rate of (6.4%). The low rate of mortality observed in study may be attributed to early presentation, early diagnosis and prompt surgical interventions. CONCLUSION: The present study has depicted that acute abdomen commonly occurred in the 2nd to 3rd decades of life, majority caused by acute appendicitis and males were predominantly affected than females. Small bowel obstruction, sigmoid volvulus, PPUD and incarcerated hernias were other observed causes of acute abdomen.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen Agudo/epidemiología , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/epidemiología , Vólvulo Intestinal/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Neumonía/epidemiología , Sepsis/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Abdomen Agudo/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Apendicitis/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Etiopía , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Vólvulo Intestinal/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Distribución por Sexo , Adulto Joven
12.
Tunis Med ; 92(12): 732-6, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25879598

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: feasibility and advantages of laparoscopic approach in performed duodenal ulcer have no longer to be demonstrated. Laparoscopic suture and peritoneal cleaning expose to a conversion rate between 10 and 23%. However less than laparotomy, morbidity of this approach is not absent. AIM: This study aim to analyze factors exposing to conversion after laparoscopic approach of perforred duodenal ulcer. We also aim to define the morbidity of this approach and predictive factors of this morbidity Methods: Retrospective descriptive study was conducted referring all cases of perforated duodenal ulcer treated laparoscopically over a period of ten years, running from January 2000 to December 2010. All patients were operated by laparoscopy with or without conversion. We have noted conversion factors. A statistical analysis with logistic regression was performed whenever we have sought to identify independent risk factors for conversion verified as statistically significant in univariante. The significance level was set at 5%. Analytic univariant and multivariant study was performed to analyze morbidity factors. RESULTS: 290 patients were included. The median age was 34ans.T he intervention was conducted completely laparoscopically in 91.4% of cases. The conversion rate was 8.6%. It was selected as a risk factor for conversion: age> 32 years, a known ulcer, progressive pain, renal function failure, a difficult peritoneal lavage and having a chronic ulcer. Postoperative morbidity was 5.1%. Three independent risk factors of surgical complications were selected: renal failure, age> 45 years, and a chronic ulcer appearance. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic treatment of perforred duodenal ulcer expose to a conversion risk. Morbidity is certainly less than laparotomy and a better Knowledge of predictif's morbidity factors become necessary for a better management of this disease.


Asunto(s)
Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Úlcera Duodenal/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/efectos adversos , Úlcera Duodenal/complicaciones , Úlcera Duodenal/epidemiología , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/efectos adversos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Morbilidad , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
13.
Dig Dis Sci ; 58(6): 1653-62, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23371011

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the prevention of upper gastrointestinal complications (UGIC; bleeding or perforation) in patients with uncomplicated peptic ulcer (PU). We assessed the effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in a non-randomized setting. To maximize exchangeability of exposed and unexposed groups we restricted the study to patients with a new diagnosis of PU, i.e., a clear indication. To minimize selection bias we mimicked an intention to treat approach by assessing the effect of PPI prescription after PU diagnosis. METHODS: Within a population of subjects aged 40-84 years from The Health Improvement Network database, 1997-2006, we identified 3,850 patients with incident PU. Among them, we confirmed 74 first UGIC episodes during a mean follow-up of 4 years. Exposure was prescription coverage during the month following PU diagnosis. We performed a nested case-control analysis and compared UGIC cases with 400 controls matched for age, sex, year and duration of follow-up. Relative risks (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. RESULTS: The overall incidence of UGIC was 4.6 cases/1,000 person-years; it was highest during the months after PU diagnosis, increased with age, and it was higher in men and subjects with Helicobacter pylori infection, anemia, and alcohol use at PU diagnosis. The RR for UGIC associated with PPI prescriptions during the month after PU diagnosis was 0.56 (95 % CI 0.31-1.0). The RR for NSAIDs with and without a PPI was 1.72 (0.68-4.45) and 3.27 (0.85-12.67), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that prescription of PPIs after a PU diagnosis is associated with a reduced risk of UGIC.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera Duodenal/tratamiento farmacológico , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/prevención & control , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/prevención & control , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Úlcera Gástrica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Úlcera Duodenal/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Riesgo , Úlcera Gástrica/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 29(12): 1357-1363, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38073456

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many studies have been done in the literature on perforations due to substance abuse, and there are limited publications on perforations related to inhaled methamphetamine. Recently, in our clinic, we observed an increase in the number of patients with perforated peptic ulcer, which we think is secondary to a significant increase in the consumption of this drug. The main purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of inhaled methamphetamine known as 'fire and ice' is a factor directly related to peptic perforation and its complications and also to determine the demographic variables of patients with peptic ulcer perforation due to this substance use, in the context of the literature. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted by examining the medical records of 29 gastric perforation patients who underwent surgical treatment in our clinic in 2021. Data were transferred to SPSS.23 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) program and evaluated with statistical analysis. Normality assumptions of continuous variables were examined with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and variance homogeneity was examined with Levene's test. Bi-level comparisons, t-test if the data are normally distributed and Mann-Whitney U-test for bi-level comparisons where the data are not normally distributed were used. Relationships between categorical variables were examined by Chi-square test analysis. P<0.05 was accepted as the level of significance in all analyzes. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were divided into two groups as methamphetamine users (n=13) and non-users (n=16). There was a statistically significant difference according to the lower age in the group using methamphetamine (31.69-48.8-P=0.025). The pres-ence of PU history differed significantly between the groups (P=0.009). Interestingly, aspartate transaminase alanine aminotransferase values were lower in substance dependents (P=0.020). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in localization between groups (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, clinical presentation, and other laboratory values. CONCLUSION: Methamphetamine consumption, known as fire and ice, is an important risk factor for ulcer development and subsequent perforation, especially in young patients and long-term consumption of this narcotic substance. It has been determined that this risk factor, which is currently considered rare, has been seen in a very large number in a short time in our clinic. The use of this substance, which is considered a major social threat, is becoming more and more widespread, and this study is only a small part of the iceberg reflected in the general surgery clinic of a hospital.


Asunto(s)
Metanfetamina , Úlcera Péptica Perforada , Humanos , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/etiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Metanfetamina/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hielo , Factores de Riesgo
15.
J Epidemiol ; 22(6): 508-16, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22955110

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is associated with serious health and economic outcomes. However, few studies have estimated the incidence and health outcomes of PPU using a nationally representative sample in Asia. We estimated age- and sex-specific incidence and short-term mortality from PPU among Koreans and investigated the risk factors for mortality associated with PPU development. METHODS: A retrospective population-based study was conducted from 2006 through 2007 using the Korean National Health Insurance claims database. A diagnostic algorithm was derived and validated to identify PPU patients, and PPU incidence rates and 30-day mortality rates were determined. RESULTS: From 2006 through 2007, the PPU incidence rate per 100 000 population was 4.4; incidence among men (7.53) was approximately 6 times that among women (1.24). Incidence significantly increased with advanced age, especially among women older than 50 years. Among 4258 PPU patients, 135 (3.15%) died within 30 days of the PPU event. The 30-day mortality rate increased with advanced age and reached almost 20% for patients older than 80 years. The 30-day mortality rate was 10% for women and 2% for men. Older age, being female, and higher comorbidity were independently associated with 30-day mortality rate among PPU patients in Korea. CONCLUSIONS: Special attention should be paid to elderly women with high comorbidity who develop PPU.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/mortalidad , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Factores de Tiempo
16.
Ethiop Med J ; 50(2): 145-51, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22924283

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer perforation is a serious complication of peptic ulcer disease with a significant morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 76 patients operated for peptic ulcer perforation and analyse the associated factors in Zewditu Memorial Hospital, Addis Ababa from September 2006 to August 2008. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records of 76 patients who were operated up on for perforated peptic ulcer over a two year period (2006-2008). RESULTS: The male to female ratio was 6.6:1 with a mean age being 31.5 years. The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain in 76 (100%) patients. History of smoking and khat chewing was documented in 53/64 (82.8%) and 48/64 (75%) of the patients respectively. Twenty five per cent of the patients gave no history of previous peptic ulcer disease. Seventy patients (92.1%) presented after 48 hours of their illness. The mean hospital stay was 14.5 days. Leucocytosis was found in 31.6% of the cases. Sixty five (85.5%) patients had duodenal ulcer perforation. Postoperative complications occurred in 24 (31.6%) patients. Twelve (15.8%) patients died in the hospital. CONCLUSION: Early presentation of patients and change in life style may reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera Duodenal/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Úlcera Duodenal/diagnóstico , Úlcera Duodenal/epidemiología , Úlcera Duodenal/cirugía , Etiopía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Úlcera Gástrica/complicaciones , Úlcera Gástrica/diagnóstico , Úlcera Gástrica/epidemiología , Úlcera Gástrica/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
17.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex ; 77(3): 108-13, 2012.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22921209

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The emergence of new synthetic drugs related to peptic ulcer perforation has been reported. Recently an increase in the use of inhaled methamphetamine has been observed and we have described an association of frequent use with peptic disease symptomatology and perforation. AIMS: To determine whether methamphetamine use is a factor related to peptic acid disease and perforation and to establish its demographic variables. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, comparative, descriptive, and observational study was carried out through the evaluation of medical records of patients admitted to the Surgery Service with perforated ulcer, within the time frame of January 2002 to March 2005. A descriptive analysis was carried out, along with the Z test, odds ratio, confidence interval, p value and the Student's t test. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were divided into 2 groups: methamphetamine users (n=25) and nonusers (n=17). There was a statistically significant difference in relation to age, which was lower in the methamphetamine user group (38,7 years vs 58,88 years, p=0.0001). In addition, there was a trend in the user group to develop peptic ulcer perforation at earlier ages compared with the nonuser group (p=0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in regard to clinical presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Methamphetamine use is related to ulcer perforation in age groups of younger patients when compared with nonuser patients.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Anfetaminas/complicaciones , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Metanfetamina/efectos adversos , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 48(1): 81-86, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33590271

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) has been associated with substantially high incidence of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors affecting the outcome of patients having perforated peptic ulcer undergoing surgical intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 112 patients with PPU who underwent emergency laparotomy between December 2014 and November 2016 were prospectively analyzed. Primary suture of the perforation and pedicled omentoplasty was done in all the patients. Data regarding patients was collected and correlated with the postoperative outcome. RESULTS: The overall postoperative morbidity and mortality were 62.5% and 30.4%, respectively. On univariate analysis advanced age (≥ 60 years) [(p = 0.005), (OR = 3.6), (95% CI = 1.5-8.8)], pre-operative shock [(p < 0.001), (OR = 7.4), (95% CI = 2.6-21.0)], delayed presentation (> 24 h) [(p = 0.007), (OR = 4.0), (95% CI = 1.5-11.2)] and raised serum creatinine [(p < 0.001), (OR = 7.7), (95% CI = 3.1-19.0)] were found to be significantly associated with the post-operative morbidity. For mortality, advanced age (≥ 60 year) [(p < 0.001), (OR = 5.02), (95% CI = 2.1-11.9)], pre-operative shock [(p < 0.001), (OR = 19.3), (95% CI = 6.9-53.6)], comorbidity [(p = 0.03), (OR = 6.6), (95% CI = 1.2-35.7)] and raised serum creatinine [(p < 0.001), (OR = 13.1), (95% CI = 4.5-37.8)] were statistically significant factors. Multivariate analysis showed advanced age (≥ 60 years) (p = 0.05) and raised serum creatinine (p = 0.004) as significant factors for increased risk of post-operative morbidity. Advanced age (≥ 60 years), pre-operative shock and raised serum creatinine were found to be independent risk factors influencing post-operative mortality (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A thorough clinical evaluation, adequate resuscitation, sepsis control, addressing comorbidities and early access to hospital can reduce the risk morbidity and mortality in patients with PPU.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera Péptica Perforada , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
19.
J Environ Public Health ; 2022: 1211499, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35910757

RESUMEN

Objective: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) in children is an uncommon disorder. An estimated 1.3 percent to 20 percent of people die from perforated peptic ulcers (PPU), a PUD consequence. Using a database, we assess the prevalence and prognosis of PPU in patients. We also do radiological and laparoscopic operations for PPU in young patients. In pediatric patients, sufficient accumulation of knowledge about laparoscopic repair is at the level of case reports. This study aims to assess the results in pediatric cases operated for PUP by open or laparoscopic surgery and determine the role of computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing PUP. Methods: Data was collected from the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, from 2015 to 2020. Patients under 18 years of age who were operated on for PUP between 2015 and 2020 were divided into two groups. Group 1 involved those patients operated by laparoscopic surgery, whereas Group 2 involved those used by open surgery. Both groups were retrospectively evaluated in terms of demographic data, clinical findings, preoperative-intraoperative findings and surgical methods (open or laparoscopic), duration of surgery, duration of nasogastric intubation, time of return to oral feeding, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results: 18 patients consisting of 15 boys and 3 girls were included in the study. Group 1 involved 10 patients, whereas Group 2 involved 8 patients. In Group 1, the symptom onset period was 1.6 ± 1.9 days, and in Group 2, it was 6.6 ± 6.1 days. In the erect abdominal radiographs (AXR) of 10 (58.8%) patients, the air was under the diaphragm. Six patients whose erect AXRs showed no attitude under the diaphragm but had abdominal pain and acute abdominal manifestation were given abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning. In all patients with PUP, laparoscopic/open surgery involves primary suturing and repair by omentoplasty (Graham patch). The mean operative time was 87.0 ± 26.3 minutes in Group 1 and 122.5 ± 57.6 minutes in Group 2. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.9 ± 1.3 days in Group 1 and 5.8 ± 2.1 days in Group 2. Neither group developed any major surgical complications. Conclusions: Adolescents with a history of sudden onset and severe abdominal pain may present with peptic ulcer perforation even if there is no known diagnosis of peptic ulcer or predisposing factor. In cases suspected of PUP, it is vital to order and carefully examine erect AXR, which is an easy and inexpensive method. Computed tomography should be the first choice in patients without free air in ADBG but whose anamnesis and findings match peptic ulcer perforation.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Úlcera Péptica Perforada , Úlcera Péptica , Radiología , Dolor Abdominal/complicaciones , Dolor Abdominal/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica/cirugía , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/diagnóstico por imagen , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Digestion ; 84(2): 102-13, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21494041

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The incidence of uncomplicated peptic ulcer has decreased in recent years. It is unclear what the impact of this has been on the epidemiology of peptic ulcer complications. This systematic review aimed to determine the incidence, recurrence and mortality of complicated peptic ulcer and the risk factors associated with these events. METHODS: Systematic PubMed searches. RESULTS: Overall, 93 studies were identified. Annual incidence estimates of peptic ulcer hemorrhage and perforation were 19.4-57.0 and 3.8-14 per 100,000 individuals, respectively. The average 7-day recurrence of hemorrhage was 13.9% (95% CI: 8.4-19.4), and the average long-term recurrence of perforation was 12.2% (95% CI: 2.5-21.9). Risk factors for peptic ulcer complications and their recurrence included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and/or acetylsalicylic acid use, Helicobacter pylori infection and ulcer size ≥1 cm. Proton pump inhibitor use reduced the risk of peptic ulcer hemorrhage. Average 30-day mortality was 8.6% (95% CI: 5.8-11.4) after hemorrhage and 23.5% (95% CI: 15.5-31.0) after perforation. Older age, comorbidity, shock and delayed treatment were associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Complicated peptic ulcer remains a substantial healthcare problem which places patients at a high risk of recurrent complications and death.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/mortalidad , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/mortalidad , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA