Efficacy and Safety of Vibegron for Persistent Symptoms of Overactive Bladder in Men Being Pharmacologically Treated for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results From the Phase 3 Randomized Controlled COURAGE Trial.

PURPOSE: The efficacy and safety of vibegron, a ß3-adrenergic receptor agonist, was assessed among men with symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) receiving pharmacologic treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a phase 3 randomized controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men ≥ 45 years with OAB symptoms and BPH, treated with α-blocker with/without 5α-reductase inhibitors, were randomized 1:1 to vibegron or placebo for 24 weeks. Coprimary end points were change from baseline at week 12 in mean daily micturitions and urgency episodes. Secondary end points were change from baseline at week 12 in mean nightly nocturia and daily urge urinary incontinence episodes, International Prostate Symptom Score‒storage score, and volume voided per micturition. Safety was evaluated via adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of 1105 participants randomized, 965 (87.3%) completed the trial. At week 12, vibegron was associated with significant reductions vs placebo in daily micturitions (least squares mean difference [95% CI], -0.74 [-1.02, -0.46]; P < .0001) and urgency episodes (-0.95 [-1.37, -0.54]; P < .0001). Vibegron was also associated with significant improvements vs placebo at week 12 in nocturia episodes (least squares mean difference, -0.22 [-0.36, -0.09]; P = .002), urge urinary incontinence episodes (-0.80 [-1.33, -0.27]; P = .003), International Prostate Symptom Score‒storage scores (-0.9 [-1.2, -0.6]; P < .0001), and volume voided (15.07 mL [9.13-21.02]; P < .0001). AE rates were similar in vibegron (45.0%) and placebo (39.0%) arms; AEs occurring in ≥ 2% of participants were hypertension (9.0% vs 8.3%), COVID-19 (4.0% vs 3.1%), UTI (2.5% vs 2.2%), and hematuria (2.0% vs 2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, vibegron met all primary and secondary end points and was safe and well tolerated in men with OAB symptoms and pharmacologically treated BPH.

What is the best first choice oral drug therapy for OAB?

AIMS: The management of overactive bladder (OAB) involves lifestyle changes and conservative measures in the first instance with the use of liquid/dietary advice, weight loss, and bladder training. Thereafter oral pharmacotherapy is instigated in symptomatic patients. Antimuscarinics and beta 3 agonists form the main classes of drug therapy in this field. Views on what is the best first line OAB treatment is changing based on recent evidence and adverse event profiles of these medications. METHODS: At the ICI-RS meeting 2023, Bristol, UK this topic was discussed and debated as a proposal. The following article summarizes the concepts presented that day as well as the interactive discussion that took place thereafter. RESULTS: OAB guidelines are moving in many circumstances to an either antimuscarinic or beta 3 agonist approach based on patient factors. Several studies have raised concerns on the long-term impact of antimuscarinics, in relation to cognition, dementia, cardiovascular events, and mortality all related to antimuscarinic load. Neither antimuscarinics nor beta 3 agonists have good persistence and adherence rates in the medium to long term. Several barriers also exist to prescribing including guidelines recommending utilizing drugs with the lowest acquisition cost and "step therapy." A newer approach to managing OAB is personalized therapy in view of the many possible etiological factors and phenotypes. These concepts are highlighted in this article. CONCLUSIONS: Current oral pharmacotherapy in managing OAB is limited by adverse events, adherence and persistence problems. Both antimuscarinics and beta 3 agonists are efficacious but most clinical trials demonstrate significant placebo effects in this field. Personalizing treatment to the individual seems a logical approach to OAB. There is a need for better treatments and further studies are required of existing treatments with high quality longer term outcomes.

Determination of Mirabegron in rat plasma by UPLC-MS/MS after oral and intravenous administration

SUMMARY Mirabegron is a kind of β3 adrenergic receptor agonist which is an effective drug for the treatment of overactive bladder. In this research, a UPLC-MS/MS method is developed and validated for the study of mirabegron pharmacokinetic in rats. A protein precipitation method is applied for sample preparation with acetonitrile. m/z 397.3→379.6, m/z 326.4→121.0 for mirabegron, tolterodine (IS), respectively in the positive ion mode was performed for quantitation. The method is reliable and reproducible in our study (intra-day precision≤11.06%, inter-day precision≤11.43%) with concentration curves linear from 5 to 2500 ng/mL(R2>0.999). Stability studies demonstrated that mirabegron was stable under a variety of storage conditions. This method was successfully applied for determining mirabegron in rats after oral and intravenous administration.

RESUMO Mirabegron é um tipo de agonista do receptor adrenérgico beta 3 que demonstra eficácia no tratamento de bexiga hiperativa. Nesta pesquisa, o método UPLC-MS/MS é desenvolvido e validado para o estudo da farmacocinética mirabegron em ratos. Um método de precipitação de proteínas é aplicado para a preparação de amostras com acetonitrilo. 397.3 → 379.6 M / Z, M / Z 326.4 → 121.0 para mirabegron, tolterodina (IS), respectivamente, para o íon positivo foi realizado para quantificação. O método é fiável e reprodutível em nosso estudo (precisão intradia ≤ 11,06%; precisão entredia ≤ 11.43%), com curvas de concentração linear de 5 a 2 ng/ml (R2 > 0,999). Estudos de estabilidade demonstraram que mirabegron permanece estável sob uma variedade de condições de armazenamento. Este método foi aplicado com sucesso para a determinação de mirabegron em ratos após administração oral e intravenosa.

Overactive bladder - pharmacological treatment

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.