Comparison of drug concentrations in postmortem cerebrospinal fluid and blood specimens.

The concentration of drugs and metabolites in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood were determined in 282 autopsied cases using liquid-liquid extraction techniques and gas chromatographic analyses. All drugs were confirmed in one matrix by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. CSF/blood ratios were used to compare the two biological fluids. Classes of drugs evaluated in this study included: benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, sedatives, opioids, antidepressants, anesthetics, and antihistamines. The majority of the drugs tested were readily detected in CSF specimens. The average CSF/blood ratio for most drugs was in the range of 0.05-0.50. Interpretation of these results is difficult because protein binding, half-life, hydrophobic properties, and pKa of a drug, in addition to survival time after drug use, influence the CSF/blood ratio. While CSF specimens do provide a viable alternative testing matrix when blood specimens are not available, they should not be used to estimate blood drug concentrations.

Duloxetine enters the brain - But why is it not found in the cerebrospinal fluid.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants enter the brain to reach their site of action in a different extent. However, there has been no study to date about duloxetine's ability to enter the brain and cerebrospinal fluid. Aim of this study was to measure blood and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of duloxetine and to account for the distribution between the two compartments. METHODS: Concentrations of duloxetine were measured in blood serum and cerebrospinal fluid of 19 patients treated with daily doses of 30-120mg. Daily doses were correlated with serum and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations and serum concentrations were correlated with concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid. RESULTS: Serum concentrations of duloxetine showed a moderate but significant correlation with the applied daily dose, r=+0.473, p=0.04. Duloxetine concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid above the designated limit of quantification of 2.0ng/mL were only found in three of the 19 patients. CONCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS: Contrasting to own preceding studies on venlafaxine, mirtazapine and citalopram with comparably high concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid, the here presented findings indicate that duloxetine shows a very different distribution pattern. Very low concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid may be due to the fact that the drug crosses the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier much worse than other antidepressants do, suggesting a low ability of duloxetine to enter the brain. Alternatively, low drug concentrations may be interpreted in a sense of a missing residence time in cerebrospinal fluid due to active transport mechanisms out of this environment either back into the bloodstream or into the brain.

Venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether drug concentrations of venlafaxine and its metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine in plasma can be considered as a surrogate marker of concentrations in brain/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). METHOD: For therapeutic drug monitoring purposes, plasma and CSF concentrations of venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine were measured between November 2011 and August 2013 in 16 depressive inpatients (ICD-10 diagnoses) who were treated with daily doses of venlafaxine extended release (dose range, 75-225 mg). Daily doses were correlated with plasma and CSF levels. The correlation between venlafaxine, O-desmethylvenlafaxine, and the active moiety (AM) in plasma and CSF was calculated. RESULTS: Venlafaxine in plasma (P = .005) and CSF (P = .023) correlated significantly with the daily dose, while O-desmethylvenlafaxine and the active moiety (AM = venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine) did not. The correlation between venlafaxine, O-desmethylvenlafaxine, and the AM in plasma and CSF was highly significant (P < .001). The calculated CSF/plasma ratio was 0.74 for venlafaxine, 0.88 for O-desmethylvenlafaxine, and 0.84 for the AM. CONCLUSIONS: Venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine were found to penetrate well into CSF in patients, which indicated good availability of the drug in the brain, although the findings on CSF concentrations do not allow calculation of concentrations at the target structure within the brain. CSF/plasma ratios for venlafaxine and its metabolite were high probably due to low plasma protein binding. The poor correlation of dose to concentrations in body fluids and the highly significant correlation of plasma to CSF concentrations indicate that plasma concentration is a much better marker of drug concentration in brain than the dose.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of cerebrospinal fluid.

The distribution of drugs into the cerebrospinal fluid has long been considered a challenging field of investigation in 2 major respects: (a) understanding how the physicochemical properties (molecular weight, pKa, plasma protein binding) of various molecules influence their movements across such a specific structure as the blood-brain barrier; and (b) defining the relationship between cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of various drugs and their central (side) effects. An attempt has been made to review the very dispersed information presently available to offer a clinically orientated picture of this area of pharmacokinetics. Drugs acting on the central nervous system (benzodiazepines, tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, opioids), antibacterial agents, cardiovascular drugs (beta-adrenoceptor blockers and digoxin), antineoplastic drugs (mainly methotrexate), and other miscellaneous agents (corticosteroids, cimetidine, methylxanthines) are reviewed. The available evidence seems to support the conclusion that only for methotrexate and antibacterial agents does knowledge of cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics have direct therapeutic implications, while the mosaic of information available for other drugs does little more than provide a partially satisfactory picture.

CSF inositol does not predict antidepressant response to inositol. Short communication.

CSF inositol was reported to be reduced in depression and inositol has been reported to be effective in treatment of depression. We studied CSF inositol in 18 drug-free depressed patients and 36 normal controls; the depressed patients then participated in an open trial of 18 gm daily inositol treatment for 4 weeks. There was no difference in pre-treatment CSF inositol between depressed patients and controls. CSF inositol levels did not predict response on the Hamilton Depression Scale to 4 weeks of inositol treatment.