RESUMEN
In keeping with the directive in Executive Order 13874 (Modernizing the Regulatory Framework for Agricultural Biotechnology Products) to adopt regulatory approaches that are proportionate to risk and avoid arbitrary distinctions across like products, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) revised its biotechnology regulations by promulgating the Sustainable, Ecological, Consistent, Uniform, Responsible, and Efficient (SECURE) rule. Specifically, the SECURE rule 1) establishes exemptions for plants modified by genetic engineering where the modification could otherwise have been made through conventional breeding, 2) uses risk posed by the introduced trait to determine whether an organism is regulated, rather than relying on whether the organism was developed using a plant pest, and 3) provides a mechanism for a rapid initial review to efficiently distinguish plants developed using genetic engineering that do not pose plausible pathways to increased plant pest risk from those that do. As a result of the focused oversight on potentially riskier crops developed using genetic engineering, USDA is expected to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its oversight program. The reduced regulatory burden is expected to promote innovation by expanding the number and diversity of developers to include smaller businesses and academics and to increase the number and variety of traits being developed through biotechnology.
Asunto(s)
Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Ingeniería Genética/legislación & jurisprudencia , Fitomejoramiento/legislación & jurisprudencia , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/genética , Estados Unidos , United States Department of AgricultureRESUMEN
Genome editing in agriculture and food is leading to new, improved crops and other products. Depending on the regulatory approach taken in each country or region, commercialization of these crops and products may or may not require approval from the respective regulatory authorities. This paper describes the regulatory landscape governing genome edited agriculture and food products in a selection of countries and regions.
Asunto(s)
Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Alimentos Modificados Genéticamente/normas , Edición Génica , Genoma de Planta , Regulación Gubernamental , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/genética , Salud Global , HumanosRESUMEN
The application of biocatalysis and White Biotechnology tools in chemical areas concerning the production of bulk compounds and other related low-added value products (with high volumes) has been gaining importance in recent years. The expected drivers of biocatalysis for these sectors are energy savings, regioselectivity (leading to cleaner products), the possibility of using thermolabile substrates, as well as the generation of less by-products and manageable wastes. This paper explores some recent industrial granted patents related to biocatalysis and bulk chemicals. Several patents have been identified in fields such as biodiesel and esterification reactions, and sugar or furan chemistry. Overall, innovative strategies involve the identification of novel enzymes, the set-up of improved immobilization methods, as well as novel reactor designs that can offer improved performances and economics. The reported examples indicate that biocatalysis can certainly offer opportunities for these areas as well, far from the typical pharmaceutical and fine chemical applications often reported in the literature.
Asunto(s)
Biocatálisis , Biotecnología/métodos , Industrias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patentes como Asunto , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudenciaAsunto(s)
Biotecnología , Atención a la Salud , Medicina , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Biotecnología/tendencias , Gestión Clínica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención a la Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención a la Salud/normas , Humanos , Legislación Médica/tendencias , Medicina/normas , Medicina/tendencias , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Responsabilidad SocialRESUMEN
An intended generalized ban on the "introduction and use of transgenic seeds" has been announced by the Mexican government, which, unlike the other agricultural programs under this administration, lacks a budget and rules of operation. In this policy brief we consider scenarios of implementing such an intended ban, de-regulating the use of genetically modified crops, or an intermediate scenario under the existing biosafety regulations. We recommend maintaining the status quo given its potential contributions to food and environmental security, in addition to a better economic outlook. However, a greater impulse needs to be given by the federal government to foment the domestic development of GM crops that are pertinent for Mexican agri-food needs, in addition to funding the development and implementation of various agro-ecological practices that increase biodiversity in food production units.
Asunto(s)
Agricultura/legislación & jurisprudencia , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Inocuidad de los Alimentos/métodos , Alimentos Modificados Genéticamente/normas , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/genética , Semillas/genética , Humanos , México , Medición de Riesgo , Semillas/crecimiento & desarrolloRESUMEN
Innovations in plant breeding like genome editing methods raised questions about the adequacy of established regulatory policies for plant breeding and biotechnology in view of these new breeding methods and the resulting products. Most countries follow the principle approach that only those plants will be regulated under biotech regulations that include a novel combination of genetic material following the Cartagena protocol. In contrast to this, the European Court of Justice interpreted the current EU biotech regulations in a way that these also apply to plants resulting from new mutagenesis breeding, even if these plants are indistinguishable from conventionally bred plants. This ruling created strong reactions and concerns stating that recent technical developments have made the EU GMO Directive no longer fit for purpose. The article describes ongoing policy developments on EU level that might result in an update of current regulations.
Asunto(s)
Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Edición Génica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Fitomejoramiento/legislación & jurisprudencia , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/genética , Unión Europea , Alimentos Modificados Genéticamente , Edición Génica/métodos , MutagénesisRESUMEN
We provide an overview of the regulatory framework, pathways and underlying regulatory authority for cell, gene and tissue-engineered therapies in Canada. Canada's regulatory approach uses three sets of regulations, namely, the Cells, Tissues and Organs Regulations, the Food and Drug Regulations and the Medical Devices Regulations. We provide an overview of each these sets of regulations as they apply to clinical investigation to post-market product lifecycle stages. Information is provided on the current sources of relevant Health Canada guidance documents. We highlight several regional success stories including Prochymal, a cell therapy product that achieved Canadian regulatory approval using the conditional marketing approval system. We also examine the perceived gaps in the Canadian regulations and how those gaps are being addressed by interactions between the government, stakeholders and international bodies. We conclude that the risk-benefit approach used by Health Canada for regulatory approval processes is sufficiently flexible to enable to development of novel cell and gene therapy products in Canada, yet stringent enough to protect patient safety.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos , Terapia Genética/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplante Homólogo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Biotecnología/métodos , Biotecnología/normas , Canadá , Humanos , Mercadotecnía/legislación & jurisprudencia , Turismo Médico , Seguridad del Paciente , Trasplante de Células Madre/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ingeniería de TejidosRESUMEN
Innovation is a key determinant of sustainable growth. Biotechnology (BT) is one such industry that has witnessed a revolution in innovative ideas leading to the founding of many new companies based on providing products, solutions and services, stretching from the food industry to environmental remediation, and new medicines. BT holds much promise for the development of national and local economies, however, this requires a strategic approach involving actors within government, industry, and academia working in concert to maximize this potential. This first article reviews the current "state of play" in the field of BT within the Central Eastern European (CEE) countries. For the purposes of this article, CEE refers to the countries of Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia (the so-called Visegrad - V4 countries). We examine the components that support the creation and development of a BT sector in CEE and also highlight the barriers to these objectives. Clearly setting priorities for the countries' policy agenda, as well as the alignment of Smart Specialization Strategy will help to focus efforts. Recent investments in R&D infrastructure within CEE have been substantial, but conditions will need to be optimized to harness these largely European investments for effective use towards SME high-tech development.
Asunto(s)
Biotecnología , Desarrollo Industrial , Industria Manufacturera , Proyectos de Investigación , Biotecnología/economía , Biotecnología/educación , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Biotecnología/organización & administración , República Checa , Ambiente , Europa (Continente) , Gobierno , Humanos , Hungría , Industria Manufacturera/organización & administración , Polonia , EslovaquiaRESUMEN
Innovation holds the potential for economic prosperity. Biotechnology (BT) has proved to be a viable vehicle for the development and utilization of technologies, which has brought not only advances to society, but also career opportunities to nation-states that have enabling conditions. In this review, we assess the current state of BT-related activities within selected new and preaccession EU countries (NPA) of CEE region namely Croatia, Romania, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia, examining educational programs, research activity, enterprises, and the financing systems. The field of BT covers a broad area of activities, including medical, food and agriculture, aquaculture or marine, environmental, biofuels, bioinformatics, and many others. Under the European Commission (EC), member-states are to set their Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialization (RIS3), to identify priorities or strengths in order to develop knowledge intensive economies. As the four countries highlighted in this review are in the early stages of implementing RIS3 or have not yet fully formulated, it presents an opportunity to learn from the successes and failures of those that have already received major structural funds from the EC. A critical point will be the ability of the public and private sectors' actors to align, in the implementation of RIS3 as new investment instruments emerge, and to concentrate efforts on a few select target goals, rather than distribute funding widely without respect to a long-term vision.
Asunto(s)
Biotecnología , Desarrollo Industrial , Proyectos de Investigación , Agricultura , Biotecnología/economía , Biotecnología/educación , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Biotecnología/organización & administración , Bosnia y Herzegovina , Croacia , Europa (Continente) , Financiación Gubernamental , Humanos , Industria Manufacturera , Investigación , Rumanía , SerbiaRESUMEN
Agricultural biotechnology continues to generate considerable controversy. We argue that to address this controversy, serious changes to governance are needed. The new wave of genomic tools and products (e.g., CRISPR, gene drives, RNAi, synthetic biology, and genetically modified [GM] insects and fish), provide a particularly useful opportunity to reflect on and revise agricultural biotechnology governance. In response, we present five essential features to advance more socially responsible forms of governance. In presenting these, we hope to stimulate further debate and action towards improved forms of governance, particularly as these new genomic tools and products continue to emerge.
Asunto(s)
Agricultura/métodos , Biotecnología/ética , Biotecnología/métodos , Ingeniería Genética/métodos , Agricultura/ética , Agricultura/legislación & jurisprudencia , Animales , Animales Modificados Genéticamente , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Participación de la Comunidad , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Ingeniería Genética/ética , Ingeniería Genética/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente , Salud Pública , Factores de RiesgoAsunto(s)
Anticuerpos/inmunología , Patentes como Asunto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Proproteína Convertasa 9/inmunología , Anticuerpos/química , Anticuerpos/farmacología , Anticuerpos/uso terapéutico , Biotecnología/economía , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Modelos Moleculares , Inhibidores de PCSK9 , Proproteína Convertasa 9/química , Estados Unidos , Universidades/economía , Universidades/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Some fundamental biotechnologies hold unprecedented potential to eradicate many incurable diseases. However, in absence of regulations, the power of patent makes the future use of some important biotechnology in few institution's hands. The excessive patents restrict researcher access to the fundamental technologies. It generates concerns and complaints of deteriorating the public health and social welfare. Furthermore, intellectual curiosities, funding, respect among colleagues etc., rather than patents, are the real motivations driving a major ground-breaking discoveries in biotechnology. These phenomena reveal that some biotechnology patents are alienated from the purpose of patent system. Therefore, it is necessary to take some approaches to stop over-patenting these fundamental biotechnology inventions. This article proposes a model regulatory framework for controlling biotechnology patent alienating from the purpose of patent system.
Asunto(s)
Biotecnología/ética , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Invenciones/ética , Invenciones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patentes como Asunto/ética , Patentes como Asunto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Biotecnología/tendencias , ADN Recombinante , Regulación Gubernamental , Historia del Siglo XVIII , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Células Madre Embrionarias Humanas , Humanos , Invenciones/tendencias , Motivación/ética , Objetivos Organizacionales , Propiedad/ética , Propiedad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Propiedad/tendencias , Patentes como Asunto/historia , Interferencia de ARN , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Corporate espionage is a multifaceted problem causing hundreds of billions of dollars in losses to businesses each year. Health care managers have a wide variety of options available to prevent theft of their organizations' trade secrets and other proprietary information. Organizations should protect their confidential and trade secret information by taking various security measures to limit access to protected material and by using appropriate types of restrictive covenants such as nondisclosure, noncompetition, and nonsolicitation agreements. This article provides helpful guidance for managers to maximize protection against theft of proprietary information.
Asunto(s)
Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Comercio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Propiedad Intelectual , Robo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Robo/prevención & control , HumanosRESUMEN
In 2012, a new and promising gene manipulation technique, CRISPR-Cas9, was announced that seems likely to be a foundational technique in health care and agriculture. However, patents have been granted. As with other technological developments, there are concerns of social justice regarding inequalities in access. Given the technologies' "foundational" nature and societal impact, it is vital for such concerns to be translated into workable recommendations for policymakers and legislators. Colin Farrelly has proposed a moral justification for the use of patents to speed up the arrival of technology by encouraging innovation and investment. While sympathetic to his argument, this article highlights a number of problems. By examining the role of patents in CRISPR and in two previous foundational technologies, we make some recommendations for realistic and workable guidelines for patenting and licensing.
Asunto(s)
Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas , Genética Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patentes como Asunto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Biotecnología/economía , Biotecnología/ética , Edición Génica , Investigación Genética/legislación & jurisprudencia , Genética Médica/economía , Genética Médica/ética , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Concesión de Licencias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patentes como Asunto/ética , Justicia SocialRESUMEN
Recent developments in gene-editing technology have enabled scientists to manipulate the human genome in unprecedented ways. One technology in particular, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Pallindromic Repeat (CRISPR), has made gene editing more precise and cost-effective than ever before. Indeed, scientists have already shown that CRISPR can eliminate genes linked to life-threatening diseases from an individual's genetic makeup and, when used on human embryos, CRISPR has the potential to permanently eliminate hereditary diseases from the human genome in its entirety. These developments have brought great hope to individuals and their families, who suffer from genetically linked diseases. But there is a dark side: in the wrong hands, CRISPR could negatively impact the course of human evolution or be used to create biological weaponry. Despite these possible consequences, CRISPR remains largely unregulated due to the United States's outdated regulatory scheme for biotechnology. Moreover, human embryo research, which is likely critical to maximizing the therapeutic applications of CRISPR, is not easily undertaken by scientists due to a number of federal and state restrictions aimed at preventing such research. This Note examines the possible benefits and consequences of CRISPR and discusses the current regulations in both the fields of biotechnology and human embryo research that hamper the government's ability to effectively regulate this technology. Ultimately, this Note proposes a new regulatory scheme for biotechnology that focuses on the processes used to create products using CRISPR, rather than the products themselves, with a focus on enabling ethical research using human embryos to maximize the potential benefits of CRISPR.
Asunto(s)
Biotecnología/ética , Biotecnología/normas , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas , Investigaciones con Embriones/ética , Edición Génica/ética , Edición Génica/normas , Regulación Gubernamental , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Investigaciones con Embriones/historia , Investigaciones con Embriones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Edición Génica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Regulación Gubernamental/historia , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Investigación con Células Madre/ética , Investigación con Células Madre/historia , Investigación con Células Madre/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we will discuss (i) how the recent advancements in digital technology and computational engineering are currently applied to nephropathology in the setting of clinical research, trials, and practice; (ii) the benefits of the new digital environment; (iii) how recognizing its challenges provides opportunities for transformation; and (iv) nephropathology in the upcoming era of kidney precision and predictive medicine. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies highlighted how new standardized protocols facilitate the harmonization of digital pathology database infrastructure and morphologic, morphometric, and computer-aided quantitative analyses. Digital pathology enables robust protocols for clinical trials and research, with the potential to identify previously underused or unrecognized clinically useful parameters. The integration of digital pathology with molecular signatures is leading the way to establishing clinically relevant morpho-omic taxonomies of renal diseases. SUMMARY: The introduction of digital pathology in clinical research and trials, and the progressive implementation of the modern software ecosystem, opens opportunities for the development of new predictive diagnostic paradigms and computer-aided algorithms, transforming the practice of renal disease into a modern computational science.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales/patología , Riñón/patología , Nefrología/métodos , Patología/métodos , Algoritmos , Investigación Biomédica , Biotecnología/educación , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Computadores , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Enfermedades Renales/genética , Enfermedades Renales/metabolismo , Microscopía/métodos , Medicina de Precisión , Programas Informáticos , TelemedicinaRESUMEN
Biotechnology has transformed the potential for plants to be a manufacturing source of pharmaceutical compounds. Now, with transgenic and transient expression techniques, virtually any biologic, including vaccines and therapeutics, could be manufactured in plants. However, uncertainty over the regulatory path for such new pharmaceuticals has been a deterrent. Consideration has been given to using alternative regulatory paths, including those for nutraceuticals or cosmetic agents. This review will consider these possibilities, and discuss the difficulties in establishing regulatory guidelines for new pharmaceutical manufacturing technologies.