Topical ivermectin ointment treatment of Demodex blepharitis: a 6-year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of topical ivermectin 1% ointment, for the treatment of Demodex blepharitis. METHODS: A retrospective study was designed to review electronic medical records of patients seen between January 2017 and December 2022, who had a diagnosis of Demodex blepharitis, treated with topical ivermectin 1% with at least 6 months of follow-up (Centro de Ojos Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina). The presence of collarettes was graded from 0 to 4. An imaging system (Keratograph) was used, to evaluate tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIKBUT), and degree of conjunctival redness. In addition, the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) test was performed. Results were compared before and after ivermectin treatment, which was performed once a day for 2 months. RESULTS: A total of 2157 patients (4314 eyes) were included. The mean age was 50.43 ± 15.3 years, and the follow-up time was 26.1 ± 8.5 months. No one discontinued treatment due to intolerance, although 14 cases (0.6 %) reported occasional discomfort. The grade of collarettes decreased with statistical significance, from 3.37 ± 0.7 to 0.1 ± 0.3 (p < 0.01), as well as conjunctival redness from 1.32 ± 0.3 to 0.94 ± 0.4 (p < 0.01) and OSDI score from 58.74 ± 17.9 to 17.1 ± 10.5 (p = 0.02). TMH and NIKBUT improved without statistical difference. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ivermectin 1% topical ointment, once daily for 2 months, was effective in reducing the presence of collarettes and in improving symptoms in patients with Demodex blepharitis.

Are inflammation-related diseases risk factors for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction? A large scale, national case-control study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for inflammatory conditions among patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted among patients of Clalit Health Services (CHS) in Israel from 2001 to 2022. For each case, three controls were matched among all CHS patients according to year of birth, sex, and ethnicity. Differences in demographic characteristics, ocular surface, eyelid, upper airway, and systemic diseases were assessed between the groups, and odds ratios (OR) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 60,726 patients diagnosed with PANDO were included. The average age of PANDO patients was 63 ± 18 years, 63% were female. Significant associations were found between PANDO and various ocular surface and eyelid conditions, including chronic conjunctivitis (OR 2.96, 95% CI [2.73-3.20]), vernal keratoconjunctivitis (OR 2.89, 95% CI [2.45-3.29]), and blepharitis (OR 2.75, 95% CI [2.68-2.83]). There was a significant association with various upper airway conditions, including rhinitis (OR 1.62, 95% CI [1.58-1.66]), chronic sinusitis (OR 1.71, 95% CI [1.62-1.80]), and deviated nasal septum (OR 1.76, 95% CI [1.69-1.84]). Association was also observed with systemic conditions, including asthma (OR 1.34, 95% CI [1.27-1.41]) and atopic dermatitis (OR 1.36, 95% CI [1.32-1.41]). CONCLUSION: Ocular surface, eyelid, upper airway, and systemic inflammatory-related diseases were found to be associated with PANDO, supporting the theory that inflammation has a prominent role in the pathophysiology of PANDO.

The impact of Demodex blepharitis on patient symptoms and daily life.

SIGNIFICANCE: Patients with Demodex blepharitis have a considerable symptomatic burden that negatively impacts their daily activities and well-being. Despite chronic manifestations of and problems associated with blepharitis that resulted in multiple visits to eye care providers, Demodex blepharitis remained underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Demodex blepharitis on patients' daily activities and well-being. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, observational study recruited 524 patients with Demodex blepharitis from 20 U.S. ophthalmology and optometry practices. Demodex blepharitis was diagnosed based on the presence of the following clinical manifestations in at least one eye: >10 collarettes on the upper lashes, at least mild lid margin erythema of the upper eyelid, and mite density of ≥1.0 mite/lash (upper and lower combined). Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire related to their symptoms, daily activities, and management approaches. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who experienced blepharitis symptoms for ≥2 years was 67.8%, and for ≥4 years, it was 46.5%. The three most bothersome symptoms ranked were "itchy eyes," "dry eyes," and "foreign body sensation." Overall, 77.4% of patients reported that Demodex blepharitis negatively affected their daily life. One-third (32.3%) of patients had visited a doctor for blepharitis at least two times, including 19.6% who visited at least four times. Despite having clinical manifestations of Demodex blepharitis confirmed by an eye care provider, 58.7% had never been diagnosed with blepharitis. Commonly used management approaches were artificial tears, warm compresses, and lid wipes. Among those who discontinued their regimen, 45.9% had discontinued because of either tolerability issues or lack of effectiveness. Among contact lens wearers, 64.3% of the patients either were uncomfortable wearing contact lenses or experienced vision changes "sometimes" or "frequently." CONCLUSION: Demodex blepharitis results in a significant negative impact on daily activities, creating a psychosocial and symptomatic burden on patients.

[Laser Doppler flowmetry in the diagnosis of chronic mixed blepharitis]. / Lazernaya dopplerovskaya floumetriya v diagnostike khronicheskogo smeshannogo blefarita.

Chronic mixed blepharitis accounts for 51.7% of all ophthalmic diseases. The use of laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) in the diagnosis of this disease can help establish the initial manifestations of the inflammatory process in the eyelids, which is important for the prevention of possible complications - dry eye disease. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the LDF method in the diagnosis of chronic mixed blepharitis based on the study of microcirculatory changes in the eyelid skin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 23 patients with chronic mixed blepharitis (mean age 67±5.8 years) and 18 healthy volunteers (mean age 63±1.1 years). LDF was performed using the LAZMA MC-1 device. ROC analysis was used to determine sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A typical disturbance of the eyelid skin microcirculation was revealed in chronic mixed blepharitis - ischemia - with inhibition of the intensity of the functioning of blood flow regulatory systems and moderate activation of the lymph flow. The sensitivity and specificity of the coefficient of variation (reflecting the vasomotor activity of microvessels) of blood flow was 71.43 and 71.43%, lymph flow - 65.71 and 80.00%; myogenic rhythms of blood flow - 83.33 and 85.71%, lymph flow - 66.67 and 71.43%; neurogenic rhythms of blood flow - 75.00 and 78.57%, lymph flow - 91.67 and 78.57%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Laser Doppler flowmetry of the eyelid skin in combination with clinical, functional and instrumental research methods helped reveal with high sensitivity and specificity the eyelid damage in chronic mixed blepharitis. This method allows assessment of the condition of the eyelids in individuals without diseases of the anterior segment of the eye.

Lotilaner Ophthalmic Solution 0.25% for Demodex Blepharitis: Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial (Saturn-2).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lotilaner ophthalmic solution 0.25% compared with vehicle for the treatment of Demodex blepharitis. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred twelve patients with Demodex blepharitis were assigned randomly in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lotilaner ophthalmic solution 0.25% (study group) or vehicle without lotilaner (control group). METHODS: Patients with Demodex blepharitis treated at 21 United States clinical sites were assigned either to the study group (n = 203) to receive lotilaner ophthalmic solution 0.25% or to the control group (n = 209) to receive vehicle without lotilaner bilaterally twice daily for 6 weeks. Collarettes and erythema were graded for each eyelid at screening and at all visits after baseline. At screening and on days 15, 22, and 43, 4 or more eyelashes were epilated from each eye, and the number of Demodex mites present on the lashes was counted with a microscope. Mite density was calculated as the number of mites per lash. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included collarette cure (collarette grade 0), clinically meaningful collarette reduction to 10 collarettes or fewer (grade 0 or 1), mite eradication (0 mites/lash), erythema cure (grade 0), composite cure (grade 0 for collarettes as well as erythema), compliance with the drop regimen, drop comfort, and adverse events. RESULTS: At day 43, the study group achieved a statistically significant (P < 0.0001) higher proportion of patients with collarette cure (56.0% vs. 12.5%), clinically meaningful collarette reduction to 10 collarettes or fewer (89.1% vs. 33.0%), mite eradication (51.8% vs. 14.6%), erythema cure (31.1% vs. 9.0%), and composite cure (19.2% vs. 4.0%) than the control group. High compliance with the drop regimen (mean ± standard deviation, 98.7 ± 5.3%) in the study group was observed, and 90.7% of patients found the drops to be neutral to very comfortable. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-daily treatment with lotilaner ophthalmic solution 0.25% for 6 weeks generally was safe and well tolerated and met the primary end point and all secondary end points for the treatment of Demodex blepharitis compared with vehicle control. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Developing and validating a questionnaire to assess the symptoms of blepharitis accompanied by dry eye disease.

PURPOSE: To propose additional items for established dry eye disease (DED) instruments that cover blepharitis-specific signs and symptoms and to determine the association between the clinical findings and subjective complaints. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with blepharitis and DED were prospectively included in the pretest period for selecting suitable questions. In the main phase of the study, the selected questions were then tested on 68 patients with blepharitis and DED and 20 controls without blepharitis or DED. Pearson's coefficient of correlation was calculated between the blepharitis-specific questions, tear break-up time (TBUT), the Schirmer test score, and the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score; and the similarity between the blepharitis-specific questions, OSDI questions, and objective parameters for DED was assessed via hierarchical clustering. Furthermore, the discriminatory power of the blepharitis-specific questions was investigated with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The additional question about heavy eyelids revealed a significant correlation with the OSDI score (r = 0.45, p < 0.001) and Schirmer score (r = - 0.32, p = 0.006). Cluster analysis demonstrated the similarity between the question about heavy eyelids and TBUT. In addition, the OSDI questionnaire had the highest discriminatory power in ROC analysis, and the OSDI score significantly correlated with the specific questions about eyelids sticking together (r = 0.47, p < 0.0001) and watery or teary eyes (r = 0.34, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The blepharitis-specific additional questions were closely associated with objective parameters for DED. The question about heavy eyelids might be well suited for recording the symptoms of hyposecretory and hyperevaporative dry eye with blepharitis.

Conjunctival Microbiota and Blepharitis Symptom Scores in Patients With Ocular Rosacea.

PURPOSE: Investigation of the relationship between blepharitis-related symptom scores, tear film functions, and conjunctival microbiota in patients with ocular rosacea (OR) compared with healthy controls was aimed. METHODS: Consecutive 33 eyes of 33 patients with OR who were admitted from the dermatology clinic and age-matched and gender-matched 30 healthy controls were included in the study. Tear breakup time (TBUT), Schirmer score, and blepharitis symptom score (BLISS) were recorded for each patient. For the bacteriological examination, bacterial culture was obtained by inoculating the samples on chocolate agar, blood agar, and fluid thioglycollate medium. The growth of different colonies of bacteria was identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption or ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Bacterial culture positivity was observed in 13 eyes (39.4%) in the patients with OR and 10 eyes (33.3%) in the controls ( P =0.618). Patients with OR showed worse TBUT and Schirmer scores, and higher BLISSs ( P =0.005, P =0.007, and P =0.001, respectively). Patients with OR with conjunctival culture-positive results showed higher BLISSs (8.0±4.7) compared with those with negative results (4.7±2.3; P <0.001). The most frequent bacteria was Micrococcus luteus (18.2%) in patients with OR and Staphylococcus epidermidis (20.0%) in the controls. CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed that patients with OR had similar conjunctival culture positivity compared with healthy controls. However, the observation of different dominant bacterial species in conjunctival microbiota and the observation of worse BLISSs in patients with OR with positive culture might suggest a potential role of conjunctival microbiota in the pathogenesis of OR.

Demodex Blepharitis: A Comprehensive Review of the Disease, Current Management, and Emerging Therapies.

ABSTRACT: Demodex blepharitis is a common disease of the eyelid, affecting approximately 25 million Americans. This article reviews what is known about the mechanisms and impact of Demodex blepharitis, risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic techniques, current management options, and emerging treatments. Demodex mites contribute to blepharitis in several ways: direct mechanical damage, as a vector for bacteria, and by inducing hypersensitivity and inflammation. Risk factors for Demodex blepharitis include increasing age, rosacea, and diabetes. The costs, symptom burden, and psychosocial effects of Demodex blepharitis are considerable. The presence of collarettes is pathognomonic for Demodex blepharitis. Redness, dryness, discomfort, foreign body sensation, lash anomalies, and itching are also hallmarks of the disease. Although a number of oral, topical, eyelid hygiene and device-based options have been used clinically and evaluated in studies for the management of Demodex blepharitis, none have been FDA approved to treat the disease. Recent randomized controlled clinical trials suggest that lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25%, is a topical treatment with the potential to eradicate Demodex mites and eliminate collarettes and eyelid redness for an extended period.

[Acaricidal therapy in chronic demodex blepharitis and meibomian gland dysfunctions]. / Akaritsidnoe lechebnoe vozdeistvie pri khronicheskom demodekoznom blefarite i disfunktsii meibomievykh zhelez.

PURPOSE: The study comparatively evaluates the effectiveness of various approaches to acaricidal treatment in patients with chronic demodex blepharitis and meibomian gland dysfunctions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 40 patients with chronic blepharitis (CB) of demodicosis etiology in conditions of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and dry eye (DE). The 1st group of patients (20 people) received acaricidal treatment as part of therapeutic eyelid hygiene (TEH; 2 times a day) involving the use of «Blefarogel ochishchenie¼, «Blefarolosion¼, «Blefarogel forte¼ (contains sulfur and metronidazole). Acaricidal treatment in the patients of the 2nd group involved applications of a product containing metronidazole (2 times a day) without TEH. Control points: 1) at inclusion in the study; 2) after a course of therapy (45 days). Evaluation included: patient acarograms, symptoms and signs of CB (points); OSDI; tear film break-up time (TBUT, sec), severity of meibomian gland dysfunction (S-MGD, points). Statistical analysis: calculation of M±SD, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: Acaricidal treatment was effective in both groups (reduction in demodex population, which was more pronounced in the 1st group). Symptoms and signs of CB were significantly less pronounced in the patients of the 1st group after therapy. The patients of the 1st group showed a significant decrease in S-MGD, OSDI and an increase in TBUT, the 2nd group - a significant decrease in OSDI and an increase in TBUT at the second control point. The positive OSDI and TBUT trends were significantly more pronounced in the 1st group. CONCLUSION: Acaricidal treatment as part of TEH showed a significantly more pronounced reduction in demodex population, relief of CB symptoms and sign, OSDI decrease and TBUT increase, compared to the 2nd group. Apparently, this was associated with combined acaricidal effect and significant S-MGD decrease in the patients of the 1st group.

Demodex Blepharitis: An Analysis of Nine Patients.

Inflammatory eyelid symptoms are common in primary care and there have been several reports on Demodex blepharitis. In the present study, we evaluate the 9 patients with Demodex blepharitis, who showed inflammation of the eyelids, dry eye, and cylindrical dandruff at the base of the eyelashes. The causative species from all patients was Demodex folliculorum of either the adult or nymph stage. Two patients had recurrent chalazion and 3 patients had keratitis. Weekly lid scrubs with 50% tee tree oil were performed for 6 weeks. After treatment, the symptoms of blepharitis and keratitis had improved in all patients. This case report provides clinical reference source for the proper treatment of ocular demodicosis.

[Chronic Blepharitis]. / Chronische Blepharitis.

Blepharitis represents a frequent inflammatory condition of the lids including the lid margin, which can be apparent in adults and children. Chronic blepharitis is therapeutically challenging. According to the anatomic localization, blepharitis can be graded in anterior and posterior forms. Blepharitis can lead to severe symptoms and complications, mainly dry eye disease, corneal complications and defective lid position. The pathogenesis of chronic blepharitis is not fully understood so far, however, multifactorial disease proceedings are supposed, which include systemic diseases (mainly dermatological disorders), habitual bacteria and infections. In all these processes inflammatory changes are the common final path.Therapeutic strategies include topical and systemic therapies, however evidence levels are generally low and patients are often resistant to therapy. Basic therapeutic measures are warm compresses, lid hygiene and lubricants. Topical anti-inflammatory drugs comprise corticosteroids and ciclosporin A. Topical and systemic antibiotics are commonly used. Systemic intake of omega-3 fatty acids is often recommended due to its anti-inflammatory potential.

[Focus on the diagnosis and treatment of blepharokeratoconjunctivitis in children].

Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis, (BKC) is a common ocular surface chronic inflammatory disease in children. It can cause eye irritation or even visual impairment. At present, the etiology of BKC in children is not clear and relevant studies are in the initial stage, consequently, there has not been an authoritative applicable expert consensus in China. Compared with adults, the clinical manifestations of pediatric patients are often atypical, coupled with the lack of understanding, so inadequate diagnosis and treatment are still exist in pediatric BKC. This article reviews the etiology, diagnosis and treatment status, clinical characteristics, standardized diagnosis and treatment of pediatric BKC, in order to arouse the attention of ophthalmologists.

First case of Phthirus pubis and Demodex co-infestation of the eyelids: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Phthirus pubis is an obligate parasite of human beings. Demodex spp. is a much more common parasite of human beings. However, P. pubis infestation accompanied by Demodex mite infestation in eye has not been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the first case of Phthirus pubis and Demodex co-infestation on a 48-years-old woman. She presented to the hospital with itching and burning at her right eye for 2 weeks. Slit lamp examination revealed multiple nits and adults of P. pubis anchored to both upper and lower eyelashes. Eyelashes were trimmed, moxifloxacin eye ointment and fluorometholone eye drops were initiated daily. However, itching didn't improve after 2 weeks of treatment. Light microscopy examination of eyelashes revealed infestation with Demodex. The patient was treated with lid scrubs with 25% tea tree oil daily for 4 weeks and was completely cured. CONCLUSION: Our report shows the importance of an early and comprehensive diagnosis, because both phthiriasis palpebrarum and demodicosis can be confused with blepharitis.

Ocular manifestations of rosacea: A clinical review.

Ocular rosacea is a chronic inflammatory condition that can occur in the absence of cutaneous features. The most common ocular features are chronic blepharoconjunctivitis with eyelid margin inflammation and meibomian gland dysfunction. Corneal complications include corneal vascularization, ulceration, scarring and, rarely, perforation. Diagnosis is largely based on clinical signs, although it is often delayed in the absence of cutaneous changes, particularly in children. It can also be associated with systemic disorders such as cardiovascular disease. Management ranges from local therapy to systemic treatment, depending on the severity of the disease. In this review, we describe the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features and treatment of rosacea and ocular rosacea.

[Morphofunctional substantiation of repeated invasive treatment of chronic blepharitis]. / Morfofunktsional'noe obosnovanie provedeniya povtornykh kursov invazivnogo lecheniya khronicheskogo blefarita.

The expanding range of diagnostic instrumental methods allows an in-depth study of the morphological and functional state of the eyelids, which is the basis for determining the strategy for the treatment of chronic blepharitis and subsequent timely supplementation and altering of its algorithm. PURPOSE: To substantiate the repeated courses of invasive treatment of chronic blepharitis based on morphological and functional studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 45 patients (90 eyes) with chronic mixed blepharitis. Instrumental research methods - laser Doppler flowmetry, laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM), tiascopy, and optical coherence tomography - were used to assess the morphological and functional state of the eyelids during meibomian gland probing (MGP) and eyelid massage course. The therapy effectiveness was evaluated after 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Using a complex of diagnostic methods for assessing the morphological and functional state of the eyelids, surgical invasive treatment for mixed chronic blepharitis was proved to have a significant positive clinical effect compared with the eyelid massage traditionally used in polyclinic practice. After 6 months from the start of treatment, in the absence of changes in the clinical picture in both groups, functional changes in the control group were recorded that were expressed as a decrease in the values of the Norn test, confirmed by the data of tiascopy, and the number of functioning meibomian glands. The indicators of lacrimal meniscus depth in both groups corresponded to the values of the monitoring stage after 3 months. According to LSCM, the control group had higher inflammatory activity: the heterogeneity of the interstitium and the walls of the acini of the meibomian glands increased, the acinar area decreased in comparison with the main group. Deterioration of the blood flow microcirculation in both groups was manifested as a decrease in neurogenic rhythms. Additionally, a 3.05% decrease in myogenic rhythms was recorded in the main group. The study of the microcirculation of lymph flow showed a decrease in neurogenic rhythms in the main group by 4.79%. CONCLUSION: The analysis of the morphological and functional state of the eyelids after MGP has shown that its results persisted for 6 months, and repeated probing was justified, while the interval before repeated course of eyelid massage averaged 1.5 months.

Ocular Demodex: a systematic review of the clinical literature.

PURPOSE: There is increasing clinical and research interest in the potential contribution of Demodex to ocular surface disease. The aim of this systematic review was to summarise and synthesise current clinical evidence relating to the aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of ocular Demodex. RECENT FINDINGS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in OVID Medline, OVID Embase, and clinical trial registries, for studies published between 1990 and August 2019, examining Demodex on the ocular surface. The review included primary clinical research studies and systematic reviews of primary clinical research studies, where Demodex was considered in the context of the ocular surface and/or adnexa. Studies were categorised using the National Health and Medical Research Council evidence hierarchy. Risk of bias assessment was performed using validated tools for studies categorised as providing Level I or II evidence. A total of 87 studies were eligible for inclusion, including two systematic reviews. Most studies (60%) were observational, describing the prevalence of ocular Demodex in different clinical populations. There was a high degree of variability in the epidemiological data derived from cross-sectional aetiology studies. There was mostly consistent evidence to support an association between ocular Demodex and chronic blepharitis. Seven diagnostic test-accuracy studies were identified, which considered a range of techniques, including slit lamp examination for cylindrical eyelash collarettes and/or eyelash manipulation techniques, light microscopic evaluation of epilated eyelashes and in vivo confocal microscopy. There is currently no accepted gold-standard diagnostic method for ocular Demodex. For intervention studies, there was one systematic review, 11 published randomised trials, six trial registry entries, and nine case series. Despite a number of recent trials, the appropriate treatment regimen for ocular Demodex (including the optimal criteria and timing of an intervention) is not clearly established. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive narrative synthesis has captured the landscape of clinical evidence relating to the prevalence, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of ocular Demodex. There remain opportunities to enhance understanding of its role in ocular surface disease, best diagnostic approaches and optimal treatment protocols.

Comparison of Biomicroscopy and Light Microscopy Findings in Demodex Diagnosis in Patients With Chronic Blepharitis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the results of biomicroscopic examination and light microscopy in the diagnosis of Demodex infestation in chronic blepharitis cases. METHODS: The study was performed with retrospective data and included patients with chronic blepharitis and who were admitted to the Medipol University Ophthalmology Outpatient Clinic. Biomicroscopic evaluation was performed intentionally under 40x magnification to investigate the presence of Demodex ectoparasites. Three or four pieces of eyelashes were obtained from all cases with epilation technique, and Demodex parasites were examined under ×100 and ×400 magnifications with light microscopy. The presence of one or more Demodex parasites in the examined area under light microscopy was considered to be positive for infestation. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate, false-negative rate, and positive and negative predictive values of biomicroscopic examination compared with those of positive light microscopy. RESULTS: Of the 255 subjects included in the study, 134 (52.5%) were men and 121 (47.5%) were women. The mean age was 43.9±11.9 years. Of the 255 chronic blepharitis cases, 130 (51%) presented Demodex infestation on light microscopy. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate, false-negative rate, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value and were found to be 83.07%, 90.4%, 9.6%, 16.9%, 90%, and 83.7%, respectively, for the biomicroscopic examination. CONCLUSIONS: Careful biomicroscopic examination can be time-efficient and cost-effective, and the need for more advanced and invasive procedures for the identification of Demodex in patients with chronic blepharitis can be reduced.

The Clinical Use of Eyelash Manipulation in the Diagnosis of Demodex folliculorum Blepharitis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of using an eyelash manipulation technique to the traditional eyelash epilation and subsequent microscopic examination technique, when investigating for the presence of Demodex folliculorum in a clinical setting. METHODS: Four hundred twenty-eight eyelashes of 107 subjects were chosen to compare the quantity of D. folliculorum visible on eyelash manipulation with the slitlamp biomicroscope to that counted on microscopic examination of the same epilated eyelash. One eyelash from each eyelid was rotated with sterile forceps in situ, and the number of D. folliculorum seen emerging from the follicle was counted. The same eyelash was then epilated, and the number of D. folliculorum on the epilated eyelash was counted. Data were analyzed to check for agreement between the two techniques. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient showed moderately good agreement for assessing the quantity of D. folliculorum (0.78) between the techniques. However, the Bland-Altman plot suggested that consistently higher quantities were found on eyelash manipulation. The overall mean quantity of D. folliculorum was also greater on eyelash manipulation (1.45 mites; range, 0-13 mites) than on microscopic examination of the epilated eyelash (0.81 mites; range, 0-16; P= <0.001). Weighted kappa (κw=0.56) indicated weak levels of agreement between the two methods for addressing severity of infestation. CONCLUSION: Eyelash manipulation exhibited larger quantities of D. folliculorum than complete epilation of the eyelash. In a clinical setting, complete eyelash epilation is not necessary to accurately detect Demodex blepharitis requiring treatment.

In which rosacea patients should Demodex in the eyelashes be investigated?

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the presence of Demodex on the face and within the eyelash follicles in patients with rosacea. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study included 80 participants, 40 patients with rosacea and 40 individuals with no rosacea as controls. The presence of Demodex on the face was assessed by standard superficial skin biopsy. Sixteen eyelashes were epilated from each patient and control. RESULTS: The rate of Demodex infestation and severe infestation on the face in patients with rosacea was significantly higher than the control group. Demodex count within the eyelash follicle was significantly higher in patients with erythematotelangiectatic type rosacea than the control group. There was no increase in blepharitis in rosacea patients but when blepharitis was present, the rate of the presence of Demodex was higher in this group. There was a statistically significant relationship between the presence of Demodex within the eyelashes and itchy eyes in people without blepharitis. CONCLUSION: When at least one Demodex is found on the face in rosacea patients, the eyelashes should be examined for effective treatment of the mite. Itchy eyes may be an important sign of the presence of Demodex in people without blepharitis.