The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial: first CAST ... then CAST-II.

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) was a study designed to test the hypothesis that suppression of ventricular premature complexes after a myocardial infarction would improve survival. Preliminary results showed that suppression of ventricular premature complexes with encainide and flecainide worsened survival, and the CAST continued as the CAST-II with moricizine compared with its placebo. The protocol for the CAST-II was changed to attempt to enroll patients more likely to experience serious arrhythmias. The enrollment time was narrowed to 4 to 90 days after myocardial infarction; the qualifying ejection fraction was lowered to less than or equal to 0.40; a higher dose of moricizine could be used; early titration itself was double-blind with a placebo, and the definition of disqualifying ventricular tachycardia was changed to allow patients with more serious arrhythmias to be entered into the trial. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial-II was subsequently terminated prematurely because 1) patients treated with moricizine had an excessive cardiac mortality rate during the 1st 2 weeks of exposure to the drug, and 2) there appeared to be little chance of showing a long-term survival benefit from treatment with moricizine. This report outlines the rationale behind the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial and the reasons for selection of the drugs used in the CAST and CAST-II.

Predicting mortality after myocardial infarction from the response of RR variability to antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that antiarrhythmic drugs that decrease RR variability will predict all-cause mortality during follow-up after myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: RR variability, a noninvasive indicator of autonomic nervous system activity, predicts death after acute myocardial infarction independently of other risk predictors and changes substantially in response to some drugs. A previous study in patients with chronic heart disease and frequent ventricular premature complexes reported that flecainide decreased vagal modulation of RR intervals but amiodarone did not. The investigators of that study speculated that changes in RR variability during antiarrhythmic drug therapy predict an increased mortality rate during long-term drug treatment. To explore this hypothesis further, we compared the effects of encainide and flecainide, which increase long-term mortality substantially, on RR variability with the effects of placebo and moricizine, which have no significant effect on mortality during long-term treatment of unsustained ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction. METHODS: The 24-h power spectral density was computed from the baseline electrocardiographic recordings and drug evaluation tapes, and six frequency domain measures of RR variability were calculated: ultra-low frequency (< 0.0033 Hz), very low frequency (0.0033 to < 0.04 Hz), low frequency (0.04 to < 0.15 Hz) and high frequency power (0.15 to < 0.40 Hz), plus total power (< 0.40 Hz) and the ratio of low to high frequency power. Changes in power spectral measures were related to drug treatment and to mortality. RESULTS: In the placebo group, values for RR interval and RR variability increased because of recovery from the effects of acute myocardial infarction. Contrasting placebo treatment with all three active antiarrhythmic drug treatments taken together showed that of all the measures of RR variability, only NN50, pNN50 and low frequency power changed significantly during drug treatment (Bonferroni adjusted p value < 0.025); these variables all decreased during drug therapy. Contrasting encainide and flecainide with moricizine, we found that the encainide and flecainide groups taken together showed a larger decrease in dLF than moricizine, but the difference was of borderline significance (Bonferroni adjusted p value < 0.08). Survival was significantly worse in the groups treated with encainide and flecainide than in the groups treated with placebo or moricizine (relative risk > 2.0, adjusted p < 0.05). The antiarrhythmic drug-induced change in measures of RR variability was not a significant predictor of all-cause mortality during a year of follow-up after myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Encainide, flecainide and moricizine all caused a decrease in RR variability in patients studied approximately 1 month after acute myocardial infarction. Encainide and flecainide caused a significant increase in mortality rates; placebo and moricizine did not. Baseline measurements of RR variability also predicted all-cause mortality after myocardial infarction. The decrease in RR variability produced by the three antiarrhythmic drugs did not predict mortality during follow-up.

Events in the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial: baseline predictors of mortality in placebo-treated patients.

Patients randomized to placebo in the encainide and flecainide arms of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) have been found to have a relatively low 1-year mortality rate of 3.9% in comparison with previous studies of patients in the postmyocardial infarction period. To determine the comparability of CAST with previous studies, baseline variables were examined in the 743 patients randomized to placebo in the flecainide and encainide arms of CAST. Twenty-three baseline characteristics were correlated with major outcome events: arrhythmic death (16 events), total mortality (26 events) and congestive heart failure (51 events). On multivariate analysis the risk of new or worsening congestive heart failure was significantly associated with diuretic use, diabetes, high New York Heart Association functional class, age, prolonged QRS duration and low ejection fraction. The risk of arrhythmic death or resuscitated cardiac arrest was significantly associated with an index Q wave myocardial infarction, history of heart failure, use of digitalis, diabetes and prolonged QRS duration. Total mortality or resuscitated cardiac arrest was significantly associated with an index Q wave myocardial infarction, diabetes, ST segment depression, high functional class, prolonged QRS duration and low ejection fraction. The variables at baseline associated with mortality from all causes or arrhythmic death or resuscitated cardiac arrest and heart failure in the CAST placebo-treated patients are similar to those identified in previous postmyocardial infarction studies. Thus, the observation of increased mortality in CAST associated with the administration of encainide and flecainide for suppression of ventricular premature depolarizations is probably applicable to any comparably defined group of patients in the postmyocardial infarction period.

Circadian pattern of arrhythmic death in patients receiving encainide, flecainide or moricizine in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on the timing of arrhythmic death. BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death remains a problem of epidemic proportions. Delineating its pathophysiology is an important step in devising preventive measures. Previous studies have shown a circadian pattern of onset of sudden cardiac death. The effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on this pattern has not been systematically studied. METHODS: The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) was a multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to determine whether suppression of ventricular ectopic activity by means of antiarrhythmic drugs (encainide, flecainide or moricizine) after acute myocardial infarction would reduce the incidence of arrhythmic death. RESULTS: The trial was terminated prematurely because of an unexpectedly high mortality rate in the active treatment group. The onset of arrhythmic death in this group (in patients not receiving beta-adrenergic blocking agents) displayed a bimodal variation, with significant peaks in midmorning and late afternoon/early evening. More than half of the symptomatic events were accompanied by anginalike symptoms. Approximately 30% of all events occurred within 2 h of awakening. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest the possibility of a complex interaction among antiarrhythmic drugs, sympathetic nervous system activation and acute myocardial ischemia. Planning of future antiarrhythmic drug trials will need to take this information into account.

Prevalence, characteristics and significance of ventricular premature complexes and ventricular tachycardia detected by 24-hour continuous electrocardiographic recording in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. CAST Investigators.

The prevalence, characteristics and significance of ventricular arrhythmias detected by ambulatory electrocardiography were evaluated in 1,498 patients who were randomized to encainide, flecainide or placebo in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. The mean ventricular premature complex (VPC) frequency at baseline was 133 +/- 257 VPCs/hour. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (rate greater than or equal to 120 beats/min) was present in 22% of patients. Accelerated idioventricular rhythm (rate less than 120 beats/min) occurred in 22% of subjects. There were 63 deaths/resuscitated cardiac arrests in the active treatment (encainide/flecainide) group and 26 in the placebo group. In the treatment group mortality increased with increasing VPC frequency, (p = 0.006), whereas in the placebo group such a relation was not present. Mortality/resuscitated cardiac arrest increased in patients with greater than or equal to 2 VT episodes than in those with less than or equal to 1 episode in the active treatment group (p = 0.04). There was no significant association between VT and mortality/resuscitated cardiac arrest in the placebo group. The presence of accelerated idioventricular rhythm was not associated with increased mortality/resuscitated cardiac arrest in either the active treatment or placebo groups. However, mortality was lower in patients with accelerated idioventricular rhythm rates less than 100 beats/min than in those with rates greater than or equal to 100 beats/min (p = 0.05). Thus, in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial the previously described association between mortality/resuscitated cardiac arrest and ventricular arrhythmias (VPC and VT) were only observed in the active treatment group. In addition, based on the results obtained in this highly selected population, it is suggested that the definition of accelerated idioventricular rhythm should be a rate less than 100 beats/min, and at a rate greater than or equal to 100 beats/min it should be categorized as VT.

Impact of the Food and Drug Administration approval of flecainide and encainide on coronary artery disease mortality: putting "Deadly Medicine" to the test.

In his book Deadly Medicine and on television, Thomas Moore impugns the process of antiarrhythmic drug approval in the 1980s, alleging that the new generation of drugs had flooded the marketplace and had caused deaths in numbers comparable to lives lost during war. To assess these important public health allegations, we evaluated annual coronary artery disease death rates in relation to antiarrhythmic drug sales (2 independent marketing surveys). Predicted mortality rates were modeled using linear regression analysis for 1982 through 1991. Deviations from predicted linearity were sought in relation to rising and falling class IC and overall class I antiarrhythmic drug use. Flecainide came to market in 1986 and encainide in 1987. Combined class IC sales peaked in 1987 and 1988 (maximum market penetration, 20%, first quarter 1989). Results of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) were disclosed in April 1989. Overall annual class I antiarrhythmic prescription sales actually fell slightly (-3% to -4%/yr) in the 2 years before CAST and then more abruptly (- 12%) in the year after CAST (1990). Sales of class IC drugs fell dramatically after CAST (by 75%). Coronary death rates (age adjusted) fell in a linear fashion during the decade of 1982 through 1991. No deviation from predicted rates was observed during the introduction, rise, and fall in class IC (and other class I) sales: rates were 126/100,000 in 1985 (before flecainide), 114 and 110 in 1987 and 1988 (maximum sales), and 103 in 1990 (after CAST). Deviations in death rates in the postulated range of 6,000 to 25,000 per year were shown to be excluded easily by the 95% confidence intervals about the predicted rates. Entry of new antiarrhythmic drugs in the 1980s did not lead to overall market expansion and had no adverse impact on coronary artery disease death rates, which fell progressively. Thus, the allegations in Deadly Medicine could not be confirmed.

Psychosocial predictors of mortality in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial-1 (CAST-1).

Psychosocial variables predict the recurrence of clinical events in symptomatic patients, controlling for measures of disease severity. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial-1, a pharmacologic test of the arrhythmia suppression and mortality hypothesis among postmyocardial infarction patients, allowed a prospective test of the relationship of distress, perceived support, social interaction, life stress, and other variables, to mortality, adjusting statistically for ejection fraction, arrhythmia rates, and other known risk factors for coronary heart disease. Results indicated that the treatment medications, encainide and flecainide, were powerful predictors of mortality. Although the psychosocial variables were significant as univariate predictors, these variables were not significant as predictors in a multivariate model that included drug treatment. When the data analysis was restricted to patients randomized to placebo, thereby eliminating the antiarrhythmic drug effect, the level of perceived social support was a significant multivariate predictor of mortality, adjusting for measures of disease severity. The adjusted hazards ratio for a 1-point decrease in the perceived support score is equal to 1.46, based on the multivariate model.

Effects of advancing age on the efficacy and side effects of antiarrhythmic drugs in post-myocardial infarction patients with ventricular arrhythmias. The CAST Investigators.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of age on the response to anti-arrhythmic drugs. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial comparing particular drugs. SETTING: Multi-institutional (The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, CAST). PARTICIPANTS: 2,371 patients, age less than 80, with ventricular arrhythmias after a recent myocardial infarction. Subjects classified by age as less than or equal to 55, 56-65, and 66-79 years. INTERVENTION: Upwardly titrated doses of encainide, flecainide or moricizine. After identification of a tolerated and effective dose of one of the drugs, participants were randomized to that drug and dose versus its placebo for up to 10 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy of drug (suppression of ventricular premature depolarizations and/or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia), side effects and mortality. RESULTS: Older patients had more previous MIs, congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertension, NSVT, repolarization abnormalities, digitalis use, and diuretic use. They had less pathologic Q-waves or electrocardiographic injury pattern, and their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower. First dose VPD suppression with the first drug averaged 53% and is not associated with age (P = 0.29). Adverse events including death are more frequent in older patients taking study drugs (P less than 0.001). This trend is consistent in all three study drugs and at varying LVEFs. History of prior MI, low LVEF, VPD (in log scale), and digitalis therapy also correlates with adverse events (all P less than 0.05). Following adjustment for these factors, older age is an independent predictor of adverse events (relative risk 1.30 per decade of age, P less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Older age increases the susceptibility to adverse cardiac events from a class of relatively toxic antiarrhythmic agents.

Efficacy of class 1C antiarrhythmic agents in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia refractory to therapy with class 1A antiarrhythmic drugs.

The efficacy of class 1C antiarrhythmic agents was determined in 36 patients with inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during baseline electrophysiology study (EPS), who continued to have inducible monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during EPS on class 1A antiarrhythmic therapy. Of 12 patients who partially responded to class 1A drugs, 11 (91.7%) continued to have a partial response during EPS on class 1C therapy, whereas one patient did not respond. Of 24 nonresponders to class 1A therapy, 2 (8.3%) responded during EPS on class 1C therapy, 7 (29.2%) partially responded, and 15 (62.5%) did not respond. In the 24 nonresponders to class 1A therapy, 9 of 17 patients (53%) with left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) > or = 30% responded or partially responded to class 1C therapy, compared with none of 7 patients with EF < 30% (P < .05). The EPS on class 1C agents in patients who fail to respond to class 1A therapy may be warranted only in those with EF > or = 30%.

Encainide dosing in patients with severe renal dysfunction: report of a case and literature review.

Dosage of encainide for patients with lethal ventricular arrhythmias is based on pharmacodynamic effects and efficacy of arrhythmia suppression, coupled with metabolizer phenotype and extent of renal and hepatic dysfunction. Decreased clearance in patients with renal dysfunction necessitates a reduction in dosage to avoid toxic and dose-related proarrhythmic effects. This case represents a patient with severe renal dysfunction and sustained ventricular tachycardia who achieved electrophysiologically guided suppression of induced ventricular tachycardia at a steady-state encainide dose of only 25 mg daily, significantly lower than package insert or compendial recommendations for initial dosage in patients with renal insufficiency. Documented "therapeutic" metabolite concentrations correlated to electrophysiologic response. Literature review illustrates the complexity of encainide dosage in such individuals and underscores the need for therapeutic drug monitoring to individualize dosage.

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial: Implications for nursing practice.

BACKGROUND: Care of patients with ventricular arrhythmia after myocardial infarction requires careful nursing management, including assisting with arrhythmia monitoring and testing. Because ventricular premature depolarization is a known risk factor for sudden cardiac death, it was hypothesized that the suppression of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ventricular premature depolarization would improve survival in these patients. OBJECTIVE: To review the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial findings and provide implications for nursing practice for patients after myocardial infarction. METHODS: The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial designed to determine whether the suppression of ventricular premature depolarizations in postmyocardial infarction patients would improve survival. Three class I antiarrhythmic drugs were used: encainide, flecainide, or moricizine. Patients for whom the drug suppressed their arrhythmia 80% or more were randomly assigned to that drug and dose or its matching placebo and were followed every 4 months (main study). Patients with 1% to 79% suppression were randomly assigned to the drug or its placebo that best treated their arrhythmia and followed every 4 months. RESULTS: Suppression of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ventricular premature depolarization in patients using encainide, flecainide, or moricizine failed to improve patient survival and was even harmful in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that in the absence of effective antiarrhythmic drug therapy, supportive nursing care and arrhythmia monitoring is important until appropriate therapy for the management of these arrhythmias in patients who have had a myocardial infarction can be found. Clinical trials are essential to provide an evaluation of therapies and direction for further studies, as well as a basis for practicing clinicians.

[When and how to treat ventricular ectopic beats]. / L'extrasistolia ventricolare isolata: quando e come trattarla.

Ventricular ectopic beats are commonly observed in daily clinical practice, either in symptomatic or asymptomatic subjects. In many subjects these arrhythmias are casually detected during a screening visit. Their occurrence is usually associated with no clinical significance. However, in some cases the presence of ventricular ectopic beats indicates susceptibility towards life-threatening arrhythmias or ventricular dysfunction. Appropriate ECG analysis and clinical evaluation are important to detect subjects in whom effective treatment is necessary.

Association between ease of suppression of ventricular arrhythmia and survival.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that patients whose ventricular arrhythmias are easy to suppress have a lower rate of arrhythmic death, defined as arrhythmic death and nonfatal cardiac arrest, the primary end point in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trials (CAST-I and CAST-II), than patients whose ventricular arrhythmias are hard to suppress. In addition, we evaluated the association between ease of suppression of ventricular arrhythmias and mortality of all causes. METHODS AND RESULTS: CAST-I investigated the effect on arrhythmic death of ventricular premature depolarization (VPD) suppression achieved by three drugs, encainide, flecainide, and moricizine, at two different dose levels; CAST-II investigated the same effect, using moricizine alone at three dose levels. If suppression was achieved, patients were randomized to the effective active drug or corresponding placebo. To examine the independence of easily suppressed ventricular arrhythmias as a predictor of arrhythmic death, we adjusted statistically for other variables that were related both to ease of suppression and arrhythmic death. Patients with ventricular arrhythmias (n = 1778) that were easy to suppress had fewer arrhythmic deaths during follow-up than those with ventricular arrhythmias that were hard to suppress (n = 1173) (relative risk, .59; P = .003). Patients whose VPDs were easily suppressed were older and had a lower frequency of prior history of heart failure and myocardial infarction. They also had a higher incidence of anterior myocardial infarction, VPD frequency, and average ejection fraction. After adjusting for these variables, we found that easily suppressed ventricular arrhythmias were still significant predictors of arrhythmic death (relative risk, .66; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the ease of VPD suppression identifies a subgroup of postmyocardial infarction patients who have low risk of arrhythmic death.

A critical appraisal of the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST).

The presence of ventricular ectopic activity in the post-myocardial infarction patient, especially associated with left ventricular dysfunction, has been associated with a high incidence of sudden cardiac death. To test the PVC hypothesis, that PVC suppression in asymptomatic patients with ventricular arrhythmias post-myocardial infarction might reduce sudden death rate, the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST) was performed. In patients treated with encainide or flecainide, total mortality at 10 months was 7.7% compared to only 3% overall mortality on placebo. The increase in mortality and sudden cardiac death with these two drugs raised the question of whether PVC suppression in this group of patients should be attempted. In addition, the extrapolation of the results of this study to other patient groups has resulted in a change of our antiarrhythmic prescription habits. Criticism of the CAST study has included a low placebo mortality, which may have been secondary to entry of low-risk groups of patients, deaths in the open label titration groups not being included, and recent advances in thrombolysis and revascularization. In addition, this low placebo mortality may have been explained by the concept that drug-responsive arrhythmias may have more benign prognosis. The above results suggest that, except for the use of beta blockers, benefits of other anti-arrhythmic drug treatment in the post-infarction patient with asymptomatic benign and potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias is questionable. Flecainide and encainide should be avoided in this group of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[What is the latest in anti-arrhythmia therapy?]. / Was gibt es Neues in der antiarrhythmischen Therapie?

Ventricular premature beats are an independent risk factor for sudden cardiac death. Class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs suppress these premature contractions. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST-Trial) tested the hypothesis that the suppression of ventricular premature beats after myocardial infarction reduces the incidence of cardiac death. The results of treatment in this low risk group were, however, disappointing. Cardiac mortality (mortality related to arrhythmia and myocardial infarction) was higher in the group treated with flecainide or encainide than in the placebo group. After a treatment period of 10 months, 89 of 1498 patients had died, 63 (8.3%) of them in the flecainide/encainide and only 26 (3.5%) in the placebo-treated group. Drugs that increase the refractory period of a myocardial substrate are obviously more effective in suppressing cardiac death than drugs that delay conduction. In the Basel Antiarrhythmic Study of Infarct Survival (BASIS study) patients with complex ventricular arrhythmias after infarction were treated with low dose amiodarone (200 mg/day). After a follow-up period of 12 months, mortality was lower in the amiodarone treated group (5/98 patients, 5%) than in the group that received no antiarrhythmic treatment (15/114 patients, 13%). Amiodarone was also more beneficial than individual antiarrhythmic therapy (mortality 10/100 patients, 10%). In the past few years no new antiarrhythmic drugs have been registered in Switzerland. Our pathophysiological and clinical knowledge has, however, increased and we know that the asymptomatic patient with low grade ventricular ectopies after myocardial infarction need not be treated. However, if we decide to use antiarrhythmic drugs, strict quality control of the effects of the treatment is mandatory.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Intravenous 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl-encainide in reentrant supraventricular tachycardia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in patients undergoing EP study.

Encainide is an agent effective in atrioventricular and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. The metabolites O-desmethyl encainide and 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl encainide (MODE) are responsible for the clinical effects of encainide in most patients. In this study, intravenous MODE was evaluated in eight patients with reentrant supraventricular tachycardia undergoing electrophysiological testing. After tachycardia was induced at least twice to ensure reproducibility, MODE (30 micrograms/kg/min x 15 min, then 7.5 micrograms/kg/min) or placebo was administered in a double-blind fashion. If tachycardia remained inducible, the infusion was unblinded; in nonresponding subjects who received placebo, MODE was then administered. Placebo was ineffective in 3/3 patients. MODE prevented tachycardia induction in 5/8 patients and increased the tachycardia cycle length from 302 +/- 38 to 413 +/- 67 msec in the other three. At a mean concentration of 774 +/- 229 ng/ml, MODE prolonged PR, AH, HV, QRS, and QT intervals, right ventricular and accessory pathway effective refractory periods, and slowed or blocked antegrade accessory pathway conduction. Changes in intracardiac conduction were rate independent between cycle lengths 400 to 600 msec, while changes in ventricular effective refractory periods were most pronounced at rapid pacing rates. No adverse effects, hemodynamic changes, or conduction disturbances occurred. Thus, MODE can modify or suppress induction of reentrant atrioventricular or atrioventricular nodal tachycardia. The study design used here is well suited for the evaluation of newer antiarrhythmic agents by electrophysiological testing.