RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In recent years, nonoperative treatment of pediatric type I open both bone forearm fractures (OBBFFs) with bedside irrigation, antibiotics, closed reduction, and casting has yielded low infection rates. However, risk factors for failure of type I OBBFF closed reduction have not been well described. Our purpose was to describe management of patients with type I OBBFFs at our institution and determine what factors are associated with failure of closed reduction in this population. METHODS: This was a review of patients between 5 and 15 years of age who received initial nonoperative management for type I OBBFFs at one institution between 2015 and 2021. Primary outcome was success or failure of nonoperative management (defined as progression to surgical management). Secondary outcomes included infections, compartment syndromes, and neuropraxias. Other variables of interest were demographic information, prereduction and postreduction translation and angulation of the radius and ulna, cast index, and antibiotic administration. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (67.7% male) with 62 type I OBBFFs were included in this study. Following initial nonoperative management, 55 injuries (88.7%) were successfully treated in casts, while the remaining 7 (11.3%) required surgical intervention following loss of acceptable reduction in cast. Median cast index (0.84, IQR 0.8 to 0.9 vs. 0.75, IQR 0.7-0.8, P =0.020) and postreduction radius translation on anteroposterior films (32.0%, IQR 17.0% to 40.0% vs. 5.0%, IQR 0.0% to 26.0%, P =0.020) were higher among those who failed nonoperative management. Multivariable logistic regression models identified increased odds of failure for every SD (0.7) increase in cast index (OR 3.78, P =0.023, 95% CI: 1.4-14.3) and 25% increase in postreduction radius translation on anteroposterior films (OR 7.39, P =0.044, 95% CI 1.2-70.4). No infections or compartment syndromes and 2 transient ulnar neuropraxias occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Closed reduction of type I OBBFFs was successful in 88.7% of cases. There were no infections after nonoperative management. Increases in cast index of 0.7 and postreduction radius translation on anteroposterior radiographs of 25% were associated with increased likelihood of failure, thus requiring surgery; age was not. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective comparative study.
Asunto(s)
Moldes Quirúrgicos , Fracturas Abiertas , Fracturas del Radio , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Fracturas del Cúbito , Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Femenino , Adolescente , Fracturas del Radio/terapia , Fracturas del Radio/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Cúbito/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Preescolar , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo , Reducción Cerrada/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures tends to be successful with functional bracing. Treatment failure due to iatrogenic conversion to an open fracture has not been described in the literature. We present a case series of patients that experienced open humeral shaft fractures after initially being treated with functional bracing for closed humeral shaft fractures and describe what factors are associated with this complication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective case series performed at three level 1 trauma centers across North America. All nonoperatively treated humeral shaft fractures were reviewed from 2001 to 2023. Patients were included if they sustained a humeral shaft fracture, > 18 years old, were initially treated non-operatively with functional bracing which subsequently converted to an open fracture. Eight patients met inclusion criteria. All included patients were eventually treated with irrigation, debridement, and open reduction and internal fixation. Outcomes assessed included mortality rate, time until the fracture converted from closed to open, need for further surgery, and bony union. Descriptive statistics were used in analysis. RESULTS: The eight included patients on average were 65 ± 21.4 years old and had a body mass index (BMI) of 25.6 ± 5.2. Six patients were initially injured due to a fall. Time until the fractures became open on average was 5.2 ± 3.6 weeks. Three patients (37.5%) died within 1.8 ± 0.6 years after initial injury. The average Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was 4.5 ± 3.4. Three patients (37.5%) had dementia. Common characteristics among this cohort included a history of visual disturbances (50.0%), cerebrovascular accident (50.0%), smoking (50.0%), and alcohol abuse (50.0%). CONCLUSION: Conversion from a closed to open humeral shaft fracture after functional bracing is a potentially devastating complication. Physicians should be especially cognizant of patients with a low BMI, history of falling or visual disturbance, dementia, age ≥ 65, decreased sensorimotor protection, and significant smoking or alcohol history when choosing to use functional bracing as the final treatment modality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Asunto(s)
Tirantes , Fracturas Abiertas , Fracturas del Húmero , Humanos , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Fracturas del Húmero/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/epidemiología , Adulto , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The superiority of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to standard gauze dressings for managing open fractures of the lower limbs remains controversial. This study aimed to comprehensively compare their clinical efficacy through a meta-analysis using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) alone. We hypothesized that NPWT would be more superior against infections. METHODS: A literature search was implemented in various databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Clinicaltrial.gov, and Cochrane Library, etc, to screen eligible RCTs. All included RCTs were evaluated for risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. In accordance with the heterogeneity assessment, a fixed-effect or random-effect model was chosen for the data analysis. RESULTS: Ten RCTs, including 2780 patients, were eligible for the meta-analysis. We found that patients in the NPWT group showed a lower overall infection rate (MD=0.70, 95% CI: 0.54-0.90, P = 0.005), acute wound infection rate (MD = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.77, P = 0.009), and shorter hospital stay (MD = 24.00, 95% CI: 6.82-84.46, P < 0.00001) compared with the control group. The NPWT group showed a higher proportion of patients with wound coverage than the control group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of function score and other complications, including deep infection rate, amputation, and bone nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: From the pooled results, we suggest that NPWT may be superior than traditional gauze dressings for managing open fractures of the lower limbs.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Vendajes , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Humanos , Extremidad Inferior , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Seymour fractures of the toe are physeal fractures with often occult concomitant nail bed injuries and thus are open fractures. They are uncommon injuries that without proper treatment can result in osteomyelitis. The literature has sparse information regarding the clinical outcomes for these injuries. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review included juxta-epiphyseal fractures or Salter-Harris I/II fracture of the toe with documented concomitant nail bed injury or laceration. Clinical and radiographic data were recorded for consecutive fractures. The primary outcome was the incidence of osteomyelitis. Secondary outcomes included premature physeal arrest, development of nail dystrophy, and functionality of the toe. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2019, 19 patients were treated for this injury by the pediatric orthopaedic division. Complications included osteomyelitis (n=6), physeal arrest (n=4), and nail dystrophy (n=1). Days from injury to definitive treatment were significantly greater in patients who developed osteomyelitis compared with those who did not (P<0.01). Patients were significantly more likely to develop osteomyelitis if they did not receive acute definitive treatment (<48 h) (P<0.001; likelihood ratio, 17.9). CONCLUSIONS: Prompt definitive treatment of Seymour fractures of the toe was associated with a lower incidence of osteomyelitis. Greater awareness for these seemingly innocuous injuries is needed to provide an early treatment that may reduce the rate of osteomyelitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas/complicaciones , Uñas/lesiones , Osteomielitis/etiología , Fracturas de Salter-Harris/complicaciones , Dedos del Pie/lesiones , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Humanos , Laceraciones/complicaciones , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de Salter-Harris/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The historical "six-hour rule" as a golden hour for timing to debridement has been refuted in modern literature. Current standards prompt a timely debridement; however, in the setting of polytrauma, patients are often resuscitated for periods >24 h, with delayed orthopedic intervention. Therefore, we sought to determine the association between prolonged time to operative debridement (>24 h) and infection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with open fractures that underwent irrigation and debridement at a single institution from 2008 to 2016. Demographic, injury, and operative variables were collected. Infection was defined as the need for intravenous antibiotics and/or repeat irrigation and debridement. Chi-squared test and univariate logistic regression were performed. P < 0.05 was the cutoff for significance. RESULTS: Of 642 patients examined, 56 (8.7%) developed an infection. Prolonged time to debridement was not associated with increased infection rates (P = 1.00). Gustilo-Anderson classification was associated with increased risk of infection (type I: 2.1%, type II: 7.6%, and type III: 14.6%; P < 0.001). In univariate analysis, infection was associated with after-hours surgery (between 7 PM and 7 AM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.02; P < 0.02), definitive fixation more than 24 h post-admission (OR = 3.08; P < 0.001), wound closure more than 24 h post-admission (OR = 4.36; P < 0.001), and more than two operations performed post-admission (OR = 8.73; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of these factors found number of operations (OR = 7.13; P < 0.001) and time to definitive wound closure (OR = 4.04; P < 0.001) to be independent predictors of developing an infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that there is no association between infection and prolonged time to debridement.
Asunto(s)
Desbridamiento/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Irrigación Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Adulto , Desbridamiento/métodos , Desbridamiento/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Irrigación Terapéutica/normas , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/normas , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Open fractures are associated with high rates of complication, morbidity and high economic costs. To improve outcomes, an open extremity fracture clinical pathway that protocolized surgical management and encouraged multidisciplinary collaboration was implemented in our institution. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes before and after the implementation of the pathway. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective review of open tibial and femur fractures covering the 2 year periods before and after pathway implementation was conducted. Patient demographics, fracture location, fixation methods and Gustilo-Anderson classification type were recorded. Primary outcomes include complications of wound infection, implant infection, delayed/non-union and flap failure occurring in a 1 year follow-up period. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, time from emergency department (ED) entrance to first wound debridement, time from ED to flap coverage and total number of operations required. RESULTS: A total of 43 pre-pathway and 46 post-pathway patients were included in this study. There was a significant reduction in length of hospital stay, a 37.5% decrease from a median of 11.2 to 7 days after pathway implementation. There was also a significant decrease in the number of fractures fixed with external fixators from 47 to 26%. No significant differences were found for the other secondary variables. In a subgroup analysis of type III fractures, there was a significant decrease in length of hospital stay as well as the number of operations required. Median length of hospital stay decreased by 46.7% from 15 to 8 days and total number of operations decreased by 50% from a median of four operations to two operations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the implementation of an open extremity fracture clinical pathway significantly reduces the proportion of external fixation surgeries, length of hospital stay, and number of operations in patients with open tibial and femur fractures, without compromising complication rates.
Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Fracturas del Fémur/terapia , Fijación de Fractura , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Tibia/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Gustilo grade IIIB open tibial fractures are relatively difficult to treat. We investigated the treatment effects of tibial intramedullary nails combined with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) for Gustilo grade IIIB open tibial fractures. From March 2015 to March 2017, 13 cases of Gustilo grade IIIB open tibial fractures were treated with Expert Tibial Nails combined with VSD. Causes of injury included falls from a height (nâ¯=â¯9, 69.2%) and road accidents (nâ¯=â¯4, 30.8%). The duration from time of injury to hospital intake was 7.3 hours (range 5 to 9.5), and the time between injury and operation was 6.7 days (range 3 to 11). Six months after the operation, overall patient general health was investigated via the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle score and the physical and mental health dimensions of the Short-Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). Postoperative complications and infections also were recorded. The results indicated that the median AOFAS score was 93.7 (range 89 to 97), with all individuals having either excellent (90 to 100; nâ¯=â¯10, 76.9%) or good (80 to 89; nâ¯=â¯3, 23.1%) outcomes. The median physical SF-36 score was 83.1 (range 72.5 to 93.0), and the median mental SF-36 score was 80.6 (range 69.7 to 92.0). Moreover, there were no instances of tibial shortening, neurovascular injury, postoperative complications, implant failure, malunion, or serious infections. In conclusion, intramedullary tibial nail combined with VSD is a safe and effective method to treat type grade IIIB open tibial fractures.
Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Drenaje/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Fracturas de la Tibia/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas Abiertas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The morbidity and mortality associated with open long bone fractures have been greatly reduced due to antibiotics and early surgical washout and debridement. Guidelines recommend early washout and debridement within 6-8 h; however, newer studies have shown that delaying surgical washout and debridement up to 24 h can be done safely without an increase in surgical site infection, wound nonunion or sepsis. All studies thus far have looked at combined blunt and penetrating open long bone fractures, without distinguishing between mechanism or type of injury. Our study looked specifically at open long bone fractures of the lower extremity caused by a penetrating mechanism of injury. METHODS: We utilized the US National Trauma Data Bank and included patients who had diagnosis of lower extremity open long bone fracture from a penetrating mechanism and underwent irrigation and debridement (I&D) within 24 h of arriving to the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 1014 patients qualified for the study. Of those, 736 (72.6%) patients underwent an I&D within 8 h and 278 (27.4%) underwent an I&D between 8 and 24 h after hospital arrival. When examining the patient outcomes, there were few cases and no significant differences in the occurrence of surgical site infections, sepsis or wound disruptions between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The majority of the open long bone fractures were due to firearm injury. I&D of penetrating open long bone fracture can be performed within 24 h without any added infective morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Desbridamiento , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Sepsis , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Irrigación Terapéutica , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto , Desbridamiento/métodos , Desbridamiento/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Extremidad Inferior/lesiones , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Masculino , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Medición de Riesgo , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/etiología , Sepsis/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Irrigación Terapéutica/normas , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During recent wars, 26% of combat casualties experienced open fractures and these injuries frequently are complicated by infections, including osteomyelitis. Risk factors for the development of osteomyelitis with combat-related open tibia fractures have been examined, but less information is known about recurrence of this infection, which may result in additional hospitalizations and surgical procedures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the risk of osteomyelitis recurrence after wartime open tibia fractures and how does the microbiology compare with initial infections? (2) What factors are associated with osteomyelitis recurrence among patients with open tibia fractures? (3) What clinical characteristics and management approaches are associated with definite/probable osteomyelitis as opposed to possible osteomyelitis and what was the microbiology of these infections? METHODS: A survey of US military personnel injured during deployment between March 2003 and December 2009 identified 215 patients with open tibia fractures, of whom 130 patients developed osteomyelitis and were examined in a retrospective analysis. No patients with bilateral osteomyelitis were included. Twenty-five patients meeting osteomyelitis diagnostic criteria were classified as definite/probable (positive bone culture, direct evidence of infection, or symptoms with culture and/or radiographic evidence) and 105 were classified as possible (bone contamination, organism growth in deep wound tissue, and evidence of local/systemic inflammation). Patients diagnosed with osteomyelitis were treated with débridement and irrigation as well as intravenous antibiotics. Fixation hardware was retained until fracture union, when possible. Osteomyelitis recurrence was defined as a subsequent osteomyelitis diagnosis at the original site ≥ 30 days after completion of initial treatment. This followup period was chosen based on the definition of recurrence so as to include as many patients as possible for analysis. Factors associated with osteomyelitis recurrence were assessed using univariate analysis in a subset of the population with ≥ 30 days of followup. Patients who had an amputation at or proximal to the knee after the initial osteomyelitis were not included in the recurrence assessment. RESULTS: Of 112 patients meeting the criteria for assessment of recurrence, 31 (28%) developed an osteomyelitis recurrence, of whom seven of 25 (28%) had definite/probable and 24 of 87 (28%) had possible classifications for their initial osteomyelitis diagnosis. Risk of osteomyelitis recurrence was associated with missing or devascularized bone (recurrence, 14 of 31 [47%]; nonrecurrence, 22 of 81 [28%]; hazard ratio [HR], 3.94; 1.12-13.81; p = 0.032) and receipt of antibiotics for 22-56 days (recurrence, 20 of 31 [65%]; nonrecurrence: 37 of 81 [46%]; HR, 2.81; 1.05-7.49; p = 0.039). Compared with possible osteomyelitis, definite/probable osteomyelitis was associated with localized swelling at the bone site (13 of 25 [52%] versus 28 of 105 [27%]; risk ratio [RR], 1.95 [1.19-3.19]; p = 0.008) and less extensive skin and soft tissue injury at the time of trauma (9 of 22 [41%; three definite/probably patients missing data] versus 13 of 104 [13%; one possible patient missing data]; RR, 3.27 [1.60-6.69]; p = 0.001). Most osteomyelitis infections were polymicrobial (14 of 23 [61%; two patients with missing data] for definite/probable patients and 62 of 105 [59%] for possible patients; RR, 1.03 [0.72-1.48]; p = 0.870). More of the definite/probable patients received vancomycin (64%) compared with the possible patients (41%; p = 0.046), and the duration of polymyxin use was longer (median, 38 days versus 16 days, p = 0.018). Time to definitive fracture fixation was not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent osteomyelitis after open tibia fractures is common. In a univariate model, patients with an intermediate amount of bone loss and those treated with antibiotics for 22 to 56 days were more likely to experience osteomyelitis recurrence. Because only univariate analysis was possible, these findings should be considered preliminary. Osteomyelitis recurrence rates were similar, regardless of initial osteomyelitis classification, indicating that diagnoses of possible osteomyelitis should be treated aggressively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas/microbiología , Medicina Militar , Osteomielitis/microbiología , Fracturas de la Tibia/microbiología , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Desbridamiento , Femenino , Fracturas Abiertas/complicaciones , Fracturas Abiertas/diagnóstico , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Osteomielitis/diagnóstico , Osteomielitis/terapia , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Irrigación Terapéutica , Fracturas de la Tibia/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico , Fracturas de la Tibia/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Guerra , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Vascularized bone grafting was for the first time described in the 1970s. It has become a crucial component in the reconstruction of long bone defects and non-unions in a poorly vascularised environment. Although the vascularized bone is well described for the lower extremity and mandibular reconstructions, it started to be used for the upper extremity bone defects only recently. This publication presents a case of a young man with an open fracture of both the forearm bones. The treatment of the injury has been complicated with anaerobic gas gangrene of the forearm. This resulted in a non-union, radius shortening and necrosis of both the thumb extensors and flexors muscles. Once the acute infection was managed, the patient received a two-step treatment provided jointly by orthopaedic and plastic surgeons at the University Hospital in Bratislava. At the first stage auto transplantation of the vascularized fibula into the defect of radius was performed, with radial artery and radial veins being the recipient vessels. One year later, a tendon transfer was made in order to reconstruct the extension and flexion of the thumb. Donor tendons were the following: extensor indicis proprius and flexor digitorum superficialis for ring finger. The result of the reconstruction is the full incorporation of the fibular transplant (6 months after the primary operation) and the excellent range of motion of the hand and wrist. Thanks to the tendon transfer the function of the thumb, including the opposition, was achieved two months after the secondary surgery. Key words: defect of radius, tendon transfer, anaerobic infection, gas necrosis, microsurgery.
Asunto(s)
Peroné/trasplante , Traumatismos del Antebrazo/cirugía , Gangrena Gaseosa/cirugía , Fracturas del Radio/cirugía , Transferencia Tendinosa/métodos , Fracturas del Cúbito/cirugía , Trasplante Óseo , Peroné/irrigación sanguínea , Antebrazo/irrigación sanguínea , Antebrazo/cirugía , Traumatismos del Antebrazo/terapia , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Gangrena Gaseosa/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
A 12-year-old blue-fronted Amazon parrot (Amazona aestiva) of unknown sex (case 1) and a 14-year-old female hybrid Catalina macaw (Ara ararauna × Ara macao) (case 2) were evaluated and treated for an open tarsometatarsal fracture and a tibiotarsal fracture, respectively. In case 1, 1 month of external coaptation resulted in a delayed union, significant osteolysis, and presumptive osteomyelitis, which led to the decision to treat with a key ring fixator. In case 2, a key ring fixator was chosen for fracture repair because of presumed resistance to destruction by the bird. In both cases, fractures were stabilized with makeshift circular external fixators composed of key rings, K-wires, orthopedic wire, and acrylic resin. After key ring fixator removal, radiographs confirmed complete bone healing. Both patients had acceptable function of the affected limbs 5 years (case 1) and 2 years (case 2) after their procedures. The key ring fixator described in this report is a viable option for fracture repair in pelvic limbs of moderately sized birds (300-1500 g).
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Aves/terapia , Fijadores Externos/veterinaria , Fijación de Fractura/veterinaria , Fracturas Óseas/veterinaria , Fracturas Abiertas/veterinaria , Loros/lesiones , Animales , Femenino , Fijación de Fractura/instrumentación , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Miembro Posterior/patologíaRESUMEN
Open tibial fractures can have devastating long-term effects. In our centre, these patients are followed up in a multidisciplinary Orthoplastic Research Clinic. To improve patient comprehension of information, we have developed personalised information leaflets. This study determines patients' views on these. The leaflet was completed during clinic visits and its role explained. At their next appointment, patients were given anonymised feedback forms, adapted from previously published questionnaires, to complete on their views and use of the leaflet. During the study period, 48 new patients attended clinic; 40 completed questionnaires and were analysed. A majority of patients (39) self-reported improved understanding of their condition, and 11 patients used the information leaflet to improve communication with other healthcare professionals. A majority of patients (34) wished to receive the information leaflet on discharge. The majority of patients in this study felt the leaflet improved their knowledge of their injuries and management.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Folletos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Fracturas de la Tibia/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comunicación , Comprensión , Femenino , Alfabetización en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The management of open fractures requires wound irrigation and débridement to remove contaminants, but the effectiveness of various pressures and solutions for irrigation remains controversial. We investigated the effects of castile soap versus normal saline irrigation delivered by means of high, low, or very low irrigation pressure. METHODS: In this study with a 2-by-3 factorial design, conducted at 41 clinical centers, we randomly assigned patients who had an open fracture of an extremity to undergo irrigation with one of three irrigation pressures (high pressure [>20 psi], low pressure [5 to 10 psi], or very low pressure [1 to 2 psi]) and one of two irrigation solutions (castile soap or normal saline). The primary end point was reoperation within 12 months after the index surgery for promotion of wound or bone healing or treatment of a wound infection. RESULTS: A total of 2551 patients underwent randomization, of whom 2447 were deemed eligible and included in the final analyses. Reoperation occurred in 109 of 826 patients (13.2%) in the high-pressure group, 103 of 809 (12.7%) in the low-pressure group, and 111 of 812 (13.7%) in the very-low-pressure group. Hazard ratios for the three pairwise comparisons were as follows: for low versus high pressure, 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.20; P=0.53), for high versus very low pressure, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.78 to 1.33; P=0.89), and for low versus very low pressure, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.23; P=0.62). Reoperation occurred in 182 of 1229 patients (14.8%) in the soap group and in 141 of 1218 (11.6%) in the saline group (hazard ratio, 1.32, 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.66; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The rates of reoperation were similar regardless of irrigation pressure, a finding that indicates that very low pressure is an acceptable, low-cost alternative for the irrigation of open fractures. The reoperation rate was higher in the soap group than in the saline group. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; FLOW ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00788398.).
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Jabones/uso terapéutico , Cloruro de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Presión , Reoperación , Método Simple Ciego , Cicatrización de Heridas , Infección de Heridas/prevención & control , Infección de Heridas/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Traumatic wounds (wounds caused by injury) range from abrasions and minor skin incisions or tears, to wounds with extensive tissue damage or loss as well as damage to bone and internal organs. Two key types of traumatic wounds considered in this review are those that damage soft tissue only and those that involve a broken bone, that is, open fractures. In some cases these wounds are left open and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is used as a treatment. This medical device involves the application of a wound dressing through which negative pressure is applied and tissue fluid drawn away from the area. The treatment aims to support wound management, to prepare wounds for further surgery, to reduce the risk of infection and potentially to reduce time to healing (with or without surgical intervention). There are no systematic reviews assessing the effectiveness of NPWT for traumatic wounds. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of NPWT for treating open traumatic wounds in people managed in any care setting. SEARCH METHODS: In June 2018 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations), Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published and unpublished randomised controlled trials that used NPWT for open traumatic wounds involving either open fractures or soft tissue wounds. Wound healing, wound infection and adverse events were our primary outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected eligible studies, extracted data, carried out a 'Risk of bias' assessment and rated the certainty of the evidence. Data were presented and analysed separately for open fracture wounds and other open traumatic wounds (not involving a broken bone). MAIN RESULTS: Seven RCTs (1377 participants recruited) met the inclusion criteria of this review. Study sample sizes ranged from 40 to 586 participants. One study had three arms, which were all included in the review. Six studies compared NPWT at 125 mmHg with standard care: one of these studies did not report any relevant outcome data. One further study compared NPWT at 75 mmHg with standard care and NPWT 125mmHg with NPWT 75 mmHg.Open fracture wounds (four studies all comparing NPWT 125 mmHg with standard care)One study (460 participants) comparing NPWT 125 mmHg with standard care reported the proportions of wounds healed in each arm. At six weeks there was no clear difference between groups in the number of participants with a healed, open fracture wound: risk ratio (RR) 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 1.27); moderate-certainty evidence, downgraded for imprecision.We pooled data on wound infection from four studies (596 participants). Follow-up varied between studies but was approximately 30 days. On average, it is uncertain whether NPWT at 125 mmHg reduces the risk of wound infection compared with standard care (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.13; I2 = 56%); very low-certainty evidence downgraded for risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision.Data from one study shows that there is probably no clear difference in health-related quality of life between participants treated with NPWT 125 mmHg and those treated with standard wound care (EQ-5D utility scores mean difference (MD) -0.01, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.06; 364 participants, moderate-certainty evidence; physical component summary score of the short-form 12 instrument MD -0.50, 95% CI -4.08 to 3.08; 329 participants; low-certainty evidence downgraded for imprecision).Moderate-certainty evidence from one trial (460 participants) suggests that NPWT is unlikely to be a cost-effective treatment for open fractures in the UK. On average, NPWT was more costly and conferred few additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) when compared with standard care. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was GBP 267,910 and NPWT was shown to be unlikely to be cost effective at a range of cost-per-QALYs thresholds. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for imprecision.Other open traumatic wounds (two studies, one comparing NPWT 125 mmHg with standard care and a three-arm study comparing NPWT 125 mmHg, NPWT 75 mmHg and standard care)Pooled data from two studies (509 participants) suggests no clear difference in risk of wound infection between open traumatic wounds treated with NPWT at 125 mmHg or standard care (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.18); low-certainty evidence downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision.One trial with 463 participants compared NPWT at 75 mmHg with standard care and with NPWT at 125 mmHg. Data on wound infection were reported for each comparison. It is uncertain if there is a difference in risk of wound infection between NPWT 75 mmHg and standard care (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.10; 463 participants) and uncertain if there is a difference in risk of wound infection between NPWT 75 mmHg and 125 mmHg (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.31 to 3.51; 251 participants. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for risk of bias and imprecision. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is moderate-certainty evidence for no clear difference between NPWT and standard care on the proportion of wounds healed at six weeks for open fracture wounds. There is moderate-certainty evidence that NPWT is not a cost-effective treatment for open fracture wounds. Moderate-certainty evidence means that the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. It is uncertain whether there is a difference in risk of wound infection, adverse events, time to closure or coverage surgery, pain or health-related quality of life between NPWT and standard care for any type of open traumatic wound.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Cicatrización de Heridas , Infección de Heridas/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Open fractures of the leg with large loss of tissue require extensive reconstructive methods that can injure the donor area. The use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) may minimise the impact of these reconstructive methods because of its capacity to create granulation tissue that will form a wound bed for the skin graft, thus reducing the volume of soft tissue defect and saving the donor region. This case study describes the effectiveness of NPWT in the treatment and reconstruction of an open fracture of the leg, with massive loss of soft tissue, associated with elastic intramedullary nailing in a 10-year-old female patient, who was a victim of a car accident. Clinical examination revealed a Gustilo-Anderson IIIB open fracture of the left leg, with the avulsion of the fifth toe, disarticulation of the fifth metatarsal bone, extensively damaged skin and subcutaneous tissue in the medium and distal third of the left leg and left foot. The bone was exposed in the distal part of the leg, external malleolus and left calcaneus. Profuse lavage, reduction of the tibial fracture and elastic intramedullary nailing, amputation of the fifth left toe, necrectomy and debridement of devitalised tissue were performed. NPWT was started, with the dressing changed every five days. After 55 days of using NPWT, granulation tissue covered the soft tissue defect and created a wound bed for the skin graft. NPWT helped the management of this open wound, achieving a wound bed for the skin graft, avoiding the use of complex reconstructive methods.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Avulsión/terapia , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia , Fracturas de la Tibia/terapia , Accidentes de Tránsito , Niño , Desbridamiento , Femenino , Fracturas por Avulsión/complicaciones , Fracturas Abiertas/complicaciones , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Pierna/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Pierna/terapia , Traumatismo Múltiple , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Trasplante de Piel , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Tibia/complicaciones , Dedos del Pie/lesiones , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
Importance: Open fractures of the lower limb occur when a broken bone penetrates the skin. There can be major complications from these fractures, which can be life-changing. Objectives: To assess the disability, rate of deep infection, and quality of life in patients with severe open fracture of the lower limb treated with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) vs standard wound management after the first surgical debridement of the wound. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized trial performed in the UK Major Trauma Network, recruiting 460 patients aged 16 years or older with a severe open fracture of the lower limb from July 2012 through December 2015. Final outcome data were collected through November 2016. Exclusions were presentation more than 72 hours after injury and inability to complete questionnaires. Interventions: NPWT (n = 226) in which an open-cell solid foam or gauze was placed over the surface of the wound and connected to a suction pump, creating a partial vacuum over the dressing, vs standard dressings not involving application of negative pressure (n = 234). Main Outcomes and Measures: Disability Rating Index score (range, 0 [no disability] to 100 [completely disabled]) at 12 months was the primary outcome measure, with a minimal clinically important difference of 8 points. Secondary outcomes were complications including deep infection and quality of life (score ranged from 1 [best possible] to -0.59 [worst possible]; minimal clinically important difference, 0.08) collected at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Results: Among 460 patients who were randomized (mean age, 45.3 years; 74% men), 88% (374/427) of available study participants completed the trial. There were no statistically significant differences in the patients' Disability Rating Index score at 12 months (mean score, 45.5 in the NPWT group vs 42.4 in the standard dressing group; mean difference, -3.9 [95% CI, -8.9 to 1.2]; P = .13), in the number of deep surgical site infections (16 [7.1%] in the NPWT group vs 19 [8.1%] in the standard dressing group; difference, 1.0% [95% CI, -4.2% to 6.3%]; P = .64), or in quality of life between groups (difference in EuroQol 5-dimensions questionnaire, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.08]; Short Form-12 Physical Component Score, 0.5 [95% CI, -3.1 to 4.1] and Mental Health Component Score, -0.4 [95% CI, -2.2 to 1.4]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with severe open fracture of the lower limb, use of NPWT compared with standard wound dressing did not improve self-rated disability at 12 months. The findings do not support this treatment for severe open fractures. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN33756652.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Extremidad Inferior/lesiones , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Personas con Discapacidad/clasificación , Femenino , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
An adult, male snowy owl ( Bubo scandiacus) was found down and unable to fly in western New York State. Physical examination and radiographs revealed a subacute, open wound and fractured major and minor metacarpals of the right wing. A minimal type II external skeletal fixator (ESF) device was placed on the right major metacarpal bone and the open wound was allowed to granulate and close. After evidence of bone union, the ESF device was removed. The owl performed auto-physiotherapy throughout the process and was released with sustained flight 2 months postoperatively. It was recaptured 7 weeks later and underwent further rehabilitation to allow successful release 11 months after surgical stabilization. To our knowledge, this is the first case report describing use of a type II ESF device on the metacarpus of a bird.
Asunto(s)
Fijadores Externos/veterinaria , Fracturas Abiertas/veterinaria , Estrigiformes/lesiones , Alas de Animales/lesiones , Animales , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Masculino , Alas de Animales/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endogenous parathyroid hormone (PTH) plays an important role in fracture healing. This study investigated whether endogenous PTH regulates fracture healing by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and/or the transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) signaling pathway. METHODS: Eight-week-old wild-type (WT) and PTH-knockout (PTH KO) male mice were selected, and models of open right-femoral fracture were constructed. Fracture healing and callus characteristics of mice in the two groups were compared by X-ray, micro-computed tomography, histological, and immunohistochemical examinations. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) of 8-week-old WT and PTHKO male mice were obtained and induced into osteoblasts and chondrocytes. RESULTS: We found that expression levels of Runt-related transcription factor (RUNX2), bone morphogenetic protein-receptor-type â ¡ (BMPR2), phosphorylated Smad 1/5/8, and phosphorylated cyclic adenosine monophosphate-responsive element binding protein (CREB) in the callus of PTHKO mice were significantly decreased, whereas no significant difference in expression of SOX9, TGF-ßR2,or pSMAD2/3 was observed between PTHKO and WT mice. Additionally, the activity of osteoblast alkaline phosphatase was low at 7 days post-induction, and was upregulated by addition of PTH or dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate (dbcAMP) to the cell culture. Furthermore, H89 (protein kinase A inhibitor)eliminated the simulating effects of PTH and dbcAMP, and a low concentration of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) was observed in PTHKO mouse BMMSCs. CONCLUSION: These results suggested that endogenous PTH enhanced BMPR2 expression by a cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway in osteoblasts, and increased RUNX2 expression through transduction of the BMP/pSMAD1/5/8 signaling pathway.
Asunto(s)
Receptores de Proteínas Morfogenéticas Óseas de Tipo II/biosíntesis , Curación de Fractura/genética , Fracturas Abiertas/genética , Hormona Paratiroidea/genética , Fosfatasa Alcalina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Fosfatasa Alcalina/genética , Animales , Receptores de Proteínas Morfogenéticas Óseas de Tipo II/genética , Proteína de Unión a Elemento de Respuesta al AMP Cíclico/genética , Proteínas Quinasas Dependientes de AMP Cíclico/genética , Fracturas Abiertas/patología , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Isoquinolinas/administración & dosificación , Ratones , Ratones Noqueados , Osteoblastos , Hormona Paratiroidea/biosíntesis , Transducción de Señal/genética , Proteínas Smad/genética , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is still no evidence in literature for damage control orthopaedics (DCO), early total care (ETC) or using external fixation solely in fractures of the long bones in multi-system-trauma. The aim of this study was to determine parameters influencing the choice of treatment in clinical routine (DCO, ETC, or EF) in femoral or tibial shaft fractures in combination with multi-system-trauma, severe soft tissue damage or both. METHODS: Data of 236 patients with 280 fractures of long bones of the lower extremities treated at a level I trauma center were analysed. Clinical parameters on arrival (age, sex [m/f], ISS, fracture site [femur/tibia], soft tissue damage [closed or open fractures according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification], pulmonary injury [yes/no]) were collected and analysed whether they influence the choice of upcoming treatment (DCO/ETC/EF). RESULTS: Our findings showed that high ISS and severe soft tissue damage (grade III) significantly correlated with DCO. High ISS, old age, female sex and fracture site (tibia) correlated with EF. This group of sole use of external fixation had highest rate of complications, 69% were associated with at least one complication. CONCLUSION: Severely injured patients are treated significantly more often with DCO or EF. The presence of higher ISS (≥16) and of type III open fractures increased the use of DCO. However, ISS, fracture-site, patient's age, type III open fractures or sex (female) increased the use of EF compared to ETC.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur/terapia , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Centros Traumatológicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico , Fracturas del Fémur/epidemiología , Fijación de Fractura/tendencias , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/tendencias , Fracturas Abiertas/diagnóstico , Fracturas Abiertas/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos/tendencias , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Open upper limb injuries requiring soft reconstruction can pose a dilemma for trauma surgeons when considering the treatment options. The British Orthopaedic Association and British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons Standard for Trauma (BOAST) have addressed the management of severe open lower limb fractures with the creation of the BOAST 4 guidelines. However, no such gold standard exists for the treatment of open injuries of the upper limb. Furthermore, treatment of these injuries is often more difficult and requires complicated strategies. Since the advent of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), there has been an improvement in wound care, though a focused review of its use in wound closure and infection prevention in the upper limb has not been published. We examine wound care management for open upper limb injuries with regard to the dressings applied, NPWT, wound closure and infection prevention. METHOD: A systematic search of Medline, Cochrane and Google Scholar was performed using the key words. The key word searches were performed by two independent reviewers and 8,792 papers were found. Manuscripts between 1990 and 2010 were included, with the addition of key manuscripts before this date. Each manuscript was assessed by the two authors independently for methodology and validity Results: Approximately 120 manuscripts fulfilled selection criteria examining the influence of NPWT on open upper and lower limb injuries, and those examining infection risk in the same injuries. Of these 120 manuscripts, 28 were suitable for inclusion in the review. The systematic review is presented, allied to the BOAST 4 principles, examining the use of NPWT and the tools available for infection prevention for wounds of the upper and lower limb. The use of NPWT in conjunction with antibiotic-bead therapy improved the way in which open fractures of both the upper and lower limb are treated. CONCLUSION: Production of guidelines is warranted for the treatment of upper limb injuries. The treatment options available for wound closure and infection prevention that are used in the treatment of open injuries of the lower limb could be adopted to open injuries of the upper limb.