Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors, Dulaglutide, and Risk for Dementia : A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Both sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may have neuroprotective effects in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, their comparative effectiveness in preventing dementia remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk for dementia between SGLT2 inhibitors and dulaglutide (a GLP-1 RA). DESIGN: Target trial emulation study. SETTING: Nationwide health care data of South Korea obtained from the National Health Insurance Service between 2010 and 2022. PATIENTS: Patients aged 60 years or older who have T2D and are initiating treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors or dulaglutide. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the presumed clinical onset of dementia. The date of onset was defined as the year before the date of dementia diagnosis, assuming that the time between the onset of dementia and diagnosis was 1 year. The 5-year risk ratios and risk differences comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with dulaglutide were estimated in a 1:2 propensity score-matched cohort adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Overall, 12 489 patients initiating SGLT2 inhibitor treatment (51.9% dapagliflozin and 48.1% empagliflozin) and 1075 patients initiating dulaglutide treatment were included. In the matched cohort, over a median follow-up of 4.4 years, the primary outcome event occurred in 69 participants in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 43 in the dulaglutide group. The estimated risk difference was -0.91 percentage point (95% CI, -2.45 to 0.63 percentage point), and the estimated risk ratio was 0.81 (CI, 0.56 to 1.16). LIMITATION: Residual confounding is possible; there was no adjustment for hemoglobin A1c levels or duration of diabetes; the study is not representative of newer drugs, including more effective GLP-1 RAs; and the onset of dementia was not measured directly. CONCLUSION: Under conventional statistical criteria, a risk for dementia between 2.5 percentage points lower and 0.6 percentage point greater for SGLT2 inhibitors than for dulaglutide was estimated to be highly compatible with the data from this study. However, whether these findings generalize to newer GLP-1 RAs is uncertain. Thus, further studies incorporating newer drugs within these drug classes and better addressing residual confounding are required. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety of South Korea.

Adverse event comparison between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and other antiobesity medications following bariatric surgery.

AIM: To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) related to antiobesity medications (AOMs; glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1RAs] vs. non-GLP-1RAs) after bariatric surgery. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective cohort included patients (aged 16-65 years) who had undergone laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy (cohort entry date) and initiated AOMs. Participants were categorized as users of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, off-label, or GLP-1RA AOMs if documented as receiving the medication on or after cohort entry date. Non-GLP-1RA AOMs were phentermine, orlistat, topiramate, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, naltrexone, bupropion/naltrexone and phentermine/topiramate. GLP-1RA AOMs included: semaglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide and liraglutide. The primary outcome was AE incidence. Logistic regression was used to determine the association of AOM exposure with AEs. RESULTS: We identified 599 patients meeting our inclusion criteria, 83% of whom were female. Their median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 47.8 (40.9-55.4) years. The median duration of surgery to AOM exposure was 30 months. GLP-1RAs use was not associated with higher odds of AEs: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-2.6) and aOR 1.1 (95% CI 0.6-2.3) for GLP-1RA versus FDA-approved and off-label AOM use, respectively. AOM initiation ≥12 months after surgery was associated with lower risk of AEs compared to <12 months (aOR 0.01 [95% CI 0.0-0.01]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that GLP-1RA AOMs were not associated with an increased risk of AEs compared to non-GLP-1RA AOMs in patients who had previously undergone bariatric surgery. Prospective studies are needed to identify the optimal timeframe for GLP-1RA initiation.

Glycaemic control, body weight, and safety of tirzepatide versus dulaglutide by baseline glycated haemoglobin level in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis of the SURPASS J-mono study.

AIM: To evaluate glycaemic control, body weight, and safety outcomes following treatment with tirzepatide or dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with a baseline haemoglobin (HbA1c) level of ≤8.5% (≤69 mmol/mol) versus >8.5% (>69 mmol/mol). MATERIALS AND METHODS: SURPASS J-mono was a 52-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, phase 3 study conducted in Japan. In this exploratory subgroup analysis of SURPASS J-mono, we examined mean change in HbA1c and body weight and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in patients with a baseline HbA1c of ≤8.5% versus >8.5% after treatment with tirzepatide (5, 10 or 15 mg) or dulaglutide 0.75 mg. RESULTS: Of 636 randomized participants, 203 had a baseline HbA1c of >8.5% and 433 had a baseline HbA1c of ≤8.5% (range ≥7.0% to ≤10.0%). Both subgroups showed significantly greater reductions in HbA1c and body weight with any-dose tirzepatide versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg, with greater HbA1c reductions observed in patients with a baseline HbA1c of >8.5% treated with tirzepatide (least squares mean [LSM] differences of -3.13% to -3.86%) or dulaglutide (LSM -1.81%) compared with patients with a baseline HbA1c of ≤8.5% (LSM -2.00% to -2.32%) or dulaglutide (LSM -1.05%; treatment-by-baseline HbA1c subgroup interaction P ≤ 0.001). For the tirzepatide treatment arms, LSM change from baseline in body weight ranged from -6.7 to -10.7 kg for the baseline HbA1c ≤8.5% subgroup and from -4.0 to -10.6 kg for the baseline HbA1c >8.5% subgroup, compared with -0.6 kg and -0.4 kg, respectively, for the dulaglutide arm. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was low, with no substantial difference in hypoglycaemia or treatment-emergent AEs between subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of baseline HbA1c (≤8.5% or >8.5%), tirzepatide at doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg is effective in Japanese patients with T2D compared with dulaglutide 0.75 mg in terms of glycaemic control and body weight reduction, with an adequate safety profile consistent with previous reports.

A randomized, double-blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of two doses of dulaglutide in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-JPN).

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in Japanese participants aged ≥20 years, with T2D for ≥6 months and inadequate glycaemic control, while on a single oral antihyperglycaemic medication (NCT04809220). The primary objective was to evaluate superiority of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg measured by mean change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to 26 weeks. Other efficacy and safety endpoints were evaluated at 26 and 52 weeks. All statistical analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Overall, 591 participants were randomized to once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg or 0.75 mg. At Week 26, dulaglutide 1.5 mg was superior to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in HbA1c reduction from baseline (least squares mean [LSM] difference -0.29% [95% confidence interval {CI} -0.43, -0.14]). At Week 52, the dulaglutide 1.5-mg arm had a significantly greater proportion of participants who achieved HbA1c <7.0% (46.3% vs. 38.5%; p = 0.03) and showed significantly greater reduction in fasting serum glucose (LSM difference -9.4 mg/dL [95% CI -14.4, -4.3]; p < 0.001) versus the dulaglutide 0.75-mg arm. No statistically significant change in body weight was observed in either treatment arm. Overall, 442 participants (75.4%) experienced treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Constipation (11.3%), diarrhoea (9.6%) and pyrexia (9.0%) were the most commonly reported TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Dulaglutide 1.5 mg once weekly demonstrated superior glycaemic control versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg once weekly, with comparable safety and tolerability, in Japanese people with T2D.

Switching to Tirzepatide 5 mg From Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: Clinical Expectations in the First 12 Weeks of Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective study aimed to describe the clinical course in terms of glycemic outcomes, body weight, and adverse events during the first 12 weeks following a switch from glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) directly to tirzepatide 5 mg. METHODS: Participants were ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes (T2D), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5% to ≤9.0%, body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 and were on a stable treatment dose of GLP-1 RAs (liraglutide every day [1.2, 1.8 mg], semaglutide once-weekly [0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg], or dulaglutide once-weekly [0.75, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 mg]) for ≥3 months at baseline. The primary end point was HbA1c change from baseline at week 12. Secondary end points included change from baseline in fasting serum glucose, body weight, and glucose assessed by continuous glucose monitoring. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Participants were 58.3 years on average, with baseline HbA1c 7.39%, body mass index 35.18 kg/m2, T2D duration around 12.4 years, and included 55% females. Semaglutide (55%) and dulaglutide (42%) were the most commonly used GLP-1 RAs at baseline with semaglutide 1.0 mg and dulaglutide 1.5 mg being the most common treatment doses. At week 12, mean HbA1c changed from baseline by -0.43%, fasting serum glucose by -7.83 mg/dL, and body weight by -2.15 kg (all P < .01). Glycemic outcomes and body weight improved in participants in all baseline GLP-1 RA subgroups. Twenty participants (13.2%) developed gastrointestinal events. Three (2%) participants discontinued tirzepatide due to adverse events. There were no severe hypoglycemic events or deaths. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study, when people with T2D on stable GLP-1 RA treatment were switched directly to tirzepatide 5 mg, they experienced improved glycemic outcomes and additional weight reduction with an acceptable risk of adverse gastrointestinal events over 12 weeks.

Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with anemia and lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in whom erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy is not effective generally become dependent on red-cell transfusions. Luspatercept, a recombinant fusion protein that binds transforming growth factor ß superfamily ligands to reduce SMAD2 and SMAD3 signaling, showed promising results in a phase 2 study. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with very-low-risk, low-risk, or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (defined according to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System) with ring sideroblasts who had been receiving regular red-cell transfusions to receive either luspatercept (at a dose of 1.0 up to 1.75 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo, administered subcutaneously every 3 weeks. The primary end point was transfusion independence for 8 weeks or longer during weeks 1 through 24, and the key secondary end point was transfusion independence for 12 weeks or longer, assessed during both weeks 1 through 24 and weeks 1 through 48. RESULTS: Of the 229 patients enrolled, 153 were randomly assigned to receive luspatercept and 76 to receive placebo; the baseline characteristics of the patients were balanced. Transfusion independence for 8 weeks or longer was observed in 38% of the patients in the luspatercept group, as compared with 13% of those in the placebo group (P<0.001). A higher percentage of patients in the luspatercept group than in the placebo group met the key secondary end point (28% vs. 8% for weeks 1 through 24, and 33% vs. 12% for weeks 1 through 48; P<0.001 for both comparisons). The most common luspatercept-associated adverse events (of any grade) included fatigue, diarrhea, asthenia, nausea, and dizziness. The incidence of adverse events decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Luspatercept reduced the severity of anemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts who had been receiving regular red-cell transfusions and who had disease that was refractory to or unlikely to respond to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents or who had discontinued such agents owing to an adverse event. (Funded by Celgene and Acceleron Pharma; MEDALIST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02631070; EudraCT number, 2015-003454-41.).

A Phase 3 Trial of Luspatercept in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent ß-Thalassemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with transfusion-dependent ß-thalassemia need regular red-cell transfusions. Luspatercept, a recombinant fusion protein that binds to select transforming growth factor ß superfamily ligands, may enhance erythroid maturation and reduce the transfusion burden (the total number of red-cell units transfused) in such patients. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, adults with transfusion-dependent ß-thalassemia to receive best supportive care plus luspatercept (at a dose of 1.00 to 1.25 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo for at least 48 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who had a reduction in the transfusion burden of at least 33% from baseline during weeks 13 through 24 plus a reduction of at least 2 red-cell units over this 12-week interval. Other efficacy end points included reductions in the transfusion burden during any 12-week interval and results of iron studies. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients were assigned to the luspatercept group and 112 to the placebo group. Luspatercept or placebo was administered for a median of approximately 64 weeks in both groups. The percentage of patients who had a reduction in the transfusion burden of at least 33% from baseline during weeks 13 through 24 plus a reduction of at least 2 red-cell units over this 12-week interval was significantly greater in the luspatercept group than in the placebo group (21.4% vs. 4.5%, P<0.001). During any 12-week interval, the percentage of patients who had a reduction in transfusion burden of at least 33% was greater in the luspatercept group than in the placebo group (70.5% vs. 29.5%), as was the percentage of those who had a reduction of at least 50% (40.2% vs. 6.3%). The least-squares mean difference between the groups in serum ferritin levels at week 48 was -348 µg per liter (95% confidence interval, -517 to -179) in favor of luspatercept. Adverse events of transient bone pain, arthralgia, dizziness, hypertension, and hyperuricemia were more common with luspatercept than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of patients with transfusion-dependent ß-thalassemia who had a reduction in transfusion burden was significantly greater in the luspatercept group than in the placebo group, and few adverse events led to the discontinuation of treatment. (Funded by Celgene and Acceleron Pharma; BELIEVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02604433; EudraCT number, 2015-003224-31.).

Weight-dependent and weight-independent effects of dulaglutide on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists may experience reductions in weight and blood pressure. The primary objective of the current study was to determine the weight-dependent and weight-independent effects of ~ 6 months treatment with dulaglutide 1.5 mg treatment in participants with T2D. METHODS: Mediation analysis was conducted for five randomized, placebo-controlled trials of dulaglutide 1.5 mg to estimate the weight-dependent (i.e., mediated by weight) and weight-independent effects from dulaglutide vs. placebo on change from baseline for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure. A random-effects meta-analysis combined these results. To investigate a dose response between dulaglutide 4.5 mg and placebo, mediation analysis was first conducted in AWARD-11 to estimate the weight-dependent and weight-independent effects of dulaglutide 4.5 mg vs. 1.5 mg, followed by an indirect comparison with the mediation result for dulaglutide 1.5 mg vs. placebo. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were largely similar across the trials. In the mediation meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials, the total treatment effect of dulaglutide 1.5 mg after placebo-adjustment on SBP was - 2.6 mmHg (95% CI - 3.8, - 1.5; p < 0.001) and was attributed to both a weight-dependent effect (- 0.9 mmHg; 95% CI: - 1.4, - 0.5; p < 0.001) and a weight-independent effect (- 1.5 mmHg; 95% CI: - 2.6, - 0.3; p = 0.01), accounting for 36% and 64% of the total effect, respectively. For pulse pressure, the total treatment effect of dulaglutide (- 2.5 mmHg; 95% CI: - 3.5, - 1.5; p < 0.001) was 14% weight-dependent and 86% weight-independent. For DBP there was limited impact of dulaglutide treatment, with only a small weight-mediated effect. Dulaglutide 4.5 mg demonstrated an effect on reduction in SBP and pulse pressure beyond that of dulaglutide 1.5 mg which was primarily weight mediated. CONCLUSIONS: Dulaglutide 1.5 mg reduced SBP and pulse pressure in people with T2D across the placebo-controlled trials in the AWARD program. While up to one third of the effect of dulaglutide 1.5 mg on SBP and pulse pressure was due to weight reduction, the majority was independent of weight. A greater understanding of the pleotropic effects of GLP-1 RA that contribute to reduction in blood pressure could support developing future approaches for treating hypertension. Trial registrations (clinicaltrials.gov) NCT01064687, NCT00734474, NCT01769378, NCT02597049, NCT01149421, NCT03495102.

Safety and effectiveness of dulaglutide in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a real-world setting: A prospective, observational post-marketing study.

AIM: To our knowledge, this is the first real-world study to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, observational, post-marketing study conducted at 46 hospitals in China included adults with T2DM prescribed dulaglutide in routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious AEs in patients who received ≥1 dose of dulaglutide, for up to 24 weeks. Exploratory endpoints included changes in patient-reported glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight. Post hoc analyses and multivariate regression were also performed. RESULTS: From 20 January 2020 to 24 November 2021, 3291 patients received dulaglutide and entered the safety analysis. TEAEs were reported in 1333 (40.5%) patients; the most commonly reported were nausea (n = 193, 5.9%), diarrhoea (n = 183, 5.6%) and decreased appetite (n = 179, 5.4%). serious AEs were reported in 160 (4.9%) patients. TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 212 (6.4%) patients. The mean absolute change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 was -1.65% (p < .001). Greater reductions in HbA1c at week 24 were observed in patients with T2DM duration ≤5 years (p = .002), baseline HbA1c ≥8.5% (p < .001), and without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (p = .002). The mean absolute change in body weight from baseline at week 24 was -2.62 kg (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Dulaglutide showed a safety profile consistent with previous reports and significantly reduced HbA1c in a real-world setting. These findings support the clinical use of dulaglutide and inform the individualized treatment of patients with T2DM in China.

Improvement of glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction by switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide to subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison study (SWITCH-SEMA 1 study).

AIM: To investigate the effects of switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide to once-weekly semaglutide on glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicentre, open-labelled, prospective, randomized, parallel-group comparison study, patients treated with liraglutide 0.9-1.8 mg/day (plan A) or dulaglutide 0.75 mg/week (plan B) were either switched to semaglutide or continued current therapy. The primary endpoint was the mean change in glycated haemoglobin over 24 weeks. The secondary endpoints included the changes of Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores, body weight and metabolic indices. RESULTS: In total, 110 patients were enrolled, and 10 were excluded; therefore, 37 patients in plan A and 63 patients in plan B completed the study. Glycated haemoglobin levels were significantly reduced in the semaglutide group in both plans [plan A, 7.8% ± 1.0% to 7.8% ± 0.7% (liraglutide) vs. 7.9% ± 0.7% to 7.3% ± 0.7% (semaglutide), p < .01; plan B, 7.8% ± 1.0% to 7.9% ± 1.2% (dulaglutide) vs. 7.8% ± 0.8% to 7.1% ± 0.6% (semaglutide), p < .01]. Semaglutide also improved Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores in both groups (plan A, +0.1 vs. +8.3, p < .01; plan B, -1.2 vs. +3.5, p < .01). Switching from dulaglutide yielded greater reductions in body weight and improved metabolic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly semaglutide administration improved glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction after switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide. These results highlighted a useful treatment option for patients with metabolic abnormalities despite glucagon-like receptor-1 receptor agonist treatment.

Change in pharmacodynamic variables following once-weekly tirzepatide treatment versus dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS J-mono substudy).

AIM: To evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects of tirzepatide, a novel dual glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist, compared with dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SURPASS J-mono was a 52-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, Phase 3 study, conducted in Japan. This substudy of SURPASS J-mono evaluated postprandial metabolic variables and appetite after a meal tolerance test, and body composition measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis. RESULTS: Of 636 participants in SURPASS J-mono, 48 were included in this substudy and assigned to tirzepatide 5 mg (n = 9), tirzepatide 10 mg (n = 11), tirzepatide 15 mg (n = 9), or dulaglutide 0.75 mg (n = 19). Participants had a mean (standard deviation) age of 58.6 (7.5) years, duration of diabetes of 6.0 (6.3) years, and body mass index of 27.5 (3.5) kg/m2 . Mean glycated haemoglobin at baseline was 66 mmol/mol (8.22%). Following a standardized meal test, statistically significant differences in change from baseline in area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to 6 h after dose for glucose, insulin, glucagon, C-peptide and triglycerides were observed in all tirzepatide treatment arms, except triglycerides at 10 mg, compared with dulaglutide at Week 32. For body composition, tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg resulted in a significant reduction in body weight, and all doses of tirzepatide resulted in a significant reduction in body fat mass at Week 52. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with dulaglutide, tirzepatide showed greater potential for normalizing metabolic factors after a standardized meal. Tirzepatide reduced body weight and body fat mass.

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly efpeglenatide in people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes: The AMPLITUDE-D, AMPLITUDE-L and AMPLITUDE-S randomized controlled trials.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly (QW) efpeglenatide in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) suboptimally controlled with oral glucose-lowering drugs and/or basal insulin (BI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three phase 3, multicentre, randomized controlled trials compared the efficacy and safety of QW efpeglenatide versus dulaglutide when added to metformin (AMPLITUDE-D), efpeglenatide versus placebo when added to BI ± oral glucose-lowering drugs (AMPLITUDE-L) or metformin ± sulphonylurea (AMPLITUDE-S). All trials were terminated early by the sponsor because of funding rather than safety or efficacy concerns. RESULTS: In AMPLITUDE-D, non-inferiority of efpeglenatide to dulaglutide 1.5 mg was shown in HbA1c reduction from baseline to week 56, least squares mean treatment difference (95% CI): 4 mg, -0.03% (-0.20%, 0.14%)/-0.35 mmol/mol (-2.20, 1.49); 6 mg, -0.08% (-0.25%, 0.09%)/-0.90 mmol/mol (-2.76, 0.96). The reductions in body weight (approximately 3 kg) from baseline to week 56 were similar across all treatment groups. In AMPLITUDE-L and AMPLITUDE-S, numerically greater reduction in HbA1c and body weight were observed at all doses of efpeglenatide than placebo. American Diabetes Association level 2 hypoglycaemia (< 54 mg/dL [< 3.0 mmol/L]) was reported in few participants across all treatment groups (AMPLITUDE-D, ≤ 1%; AMPLITUDE-L, ≤ 10%; and AMPLITUDE-S, ≤ 4%). The adverse events profile was consistent with other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs); gastrointestinal adverse events were most frequent in all three studies. CONCLUSIONS: In people with T2D suboptimally controlled with oral glucose-lowering drugs and/or BI, QW efpeglenatide was non-inferior to dulaglutide in terms of HbA1c reduction and showed numerically greater improvements than placebo in glycaemic control and body weight, with safety consistent with the GLP-1 RA class.

Vitreous hemorrhage during GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this case report is to describe a case of vitreous hemorrhage in a patient with a history of diabetic retinopathy and receiving dulaglutide for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). CASE SUMMARY: A 64-year-old African American male with a past medical history of T2DM and severe diabetic retinopathy for 4 years was restarted on dulaglutide 1.5 mg weekly after being off therapy for 3 months. Baseline laboratory test results included hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 8.8% and random blood glucose (BG) of 280 mg/dL. In addition, the patient had an average fasting BG of 150 mg/dL. In absence of intolerance, the dulaglutide dose was gradually maximized to 4.5 mg weekly and HbA1c decreased to 7.3% and random BG to 121 mg/dL at week 12 since reinitiation. At week 17 of therapy, the patient presented to the emergency department with a 1-day history of vision loss in the left eye and was diagnosed as having vitreous hemorrhage. The etiology for vitreous hemorrhage is unclear and may be a spontaneous episode. In discussion with the patient and the ophthalmologist, dulaglutide was restarted at 1.5 mg once weekly. After 4 weeks of reinitiation, the patient denied any recurrent symptoms of vitreous hemorrhage or worsening diabetic retinopathy. The most recent ophthalmology evaluation indicated no change in diabetic retinopathy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This case report adds to the limited body of evidence available for the incidence of vitreous hemorrhage in the setting of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) therapy and pre-existing diabetic retinopathy. The case report illustrates that a history of diabetic retinopathy should not automatically preclude the use of GLP-1 RAs.

Revacept, an Inhibitor of Platelet Adhesion in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis are at high risk of recurrent ischemic stroke and require early interventional treatment and antiplatelet therapy. Increased bleeding rates might counterbalance the periprocedural efficacy of intensified platelet inhibition. We aim to investigate, whether Revacept, a competitive antagonist of glycoprotein VI, adjunct to standard antiplatelet therapy reduces the occurrence of ischemic lesions in patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis. METHODS: International, multicenter (16 sites), 3-arm, randomized (1:1:1), double-blind, and placebo-controlled study with parallel groups, including patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis. A single infusion over 20 minutes of either placebo, 40 mg or 120 mg Revacept in addition to guideline-conform antiplatelet therapy was evaluated with regard to the exploratory efficacy end point: Number of new ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after treatment initiation. Main clinical outcome was the combined safety and efficacy end point including any stroke or death, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, coronary intervention, and bleeding complications during follow-up. RESULTS: Out of 160 randomized patients, 158 patients (68±10.1 years, 24% female) received study medication (51 patients placebo, 54 patients 40 mg Revacept and 53 patients 120 mg Revacept) and were followed for 11.2±2.3 months. A total of 1.16 (95% CI, 0.88-1.53)/1.05 (95% CI, 0.78-1.42; P=0.629)/0.63 (95% CI, 0.43-0.93) new diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging lesions per patient were detected in the placebo/40 mg/120 mg Revacept groups, without statistical evidence of a difference. A reduction of the combined safety and efficacy end point during the study period was observed in patients who received 120 mg (HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.21-0.99]; P=0.047), but not 40 mg Revacept compared with placebo (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.37-1.42]; P=0.343). CONCLUSIONS: Revacept 120 mg reduced the combined safety and efficacy end point in patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique Identifier: NCT01645306.

Luspatercept, a two-edged sword in beta-thalassemia-associated paravertebral extramedullary hematopoietic masses (EHMs).

Paravertebral extramedullary hematopoietic masses (EHMs) account for up to 15% of extramedullary pseudotumors in beta-thalassemia (BT) and are most likely related to compensatory hematopoiesis. In most cases, pseudotumors are incidentally detected, as the majority of patients are asymptomatic. Since June 2020, luspatercept is approved for the treatment of patients with BT who require regular red blood cell transfusions. Data addressing the safety and efficacy of luspatercept in patients with BT-associated EHMs are pending. To date (May 2022), paravertebral EHMs were observed in two asymptomatic patients out of currently 43 adult patients with BT registered at the Adult Hemoglobinopathy Outpatient Unit of the University Hospital Essen, Germany. In one of them, a paravertebral EHM was diagnosed more than 10 years prior to referral. Throughout observation time, treatment with luspatercept was associated with a clinically significant reduction in transfusion burden while allowing to maintain a baseline hemoglobin concentration of ≥10 g/dL aiming to suppress endogenous (ineffective) erythropoiesis associated with BT. Considering the rarity of paravertebral EHMs in BT, luspatercept might potentially represent a novel therapeutic option for these often-serious disease-associated complications. However, appropriate follow-up investigations are recommended to detect (early) treatment failures secondary to an undesired luspatercept-associated erythroid expansion.

The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (TROPHIES): Patient disposition, clinical characteristics and treatment persistence at 12 months.

AIMS: The primary objective of the TROPHIES observational study is to estimate the duration of treatment on dulaglutide or liraglutide without a significant treatment change by 24 months in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating their first injectable treatment with these glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). This manuscript presents 12-month interim data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TROPHIES is a prospective, non-comparative, observational study of patients with T2D in Europe, naïve to injectable antihyperglycaemic treatments and initiating dulaglutide or liraglutide. Data on clinical characteristics, GLP-1 RA persistence and treatment patterns of glucose-lowering medication were collected at initiation of first injectable therapy and by 12 months. RESULTS: By 12 months, 1014 dulaglutide and 991 liraglutide patients were eligible across France, Germany and Italy. Both cohorts presented a high probability [95% confidence interval (CI)] of GLP-1 RA persistence [dulaglutide, 0.88 (0.86 to 0.90); liraglutide, 0.83 (0.80 to 0.85)] and reduction in mean glycated haemoglobin percentage (95% CI) from baseline [dulaglutide, -1.18 (-1.27 to -1.08); liraglutide, -1.15 (-1.26 to -1.05)] with 48.2% of dulaglutide and 41.2% of liraglutide patients reaching their individualized glycated haemoglobin percentage target set by the physician at baseline. Mean weight (95% CI) change from baseline was -3.2 kg (-3.6 to -2.8) for dulaglutide and -3.4 kg (-3.9 to -3.0) for liraglutide. Slight changes in concomitant medications were observed compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: In the real-world setting, dulaglutide and liraglutide cohorts achieved good persistence with similarly improved glycaemic control that was accompanied by weight loss at 12 months, consistent with previous clinical trial results.

A model-based simulation of glycaemic control and body weight when switching from semaglutide to 3.0- and 4.5-mg doses of once-weekly dulaglutide.

AIM: To evaluate HbA1c and body weight changes when semaglutide 0.5- or 1.0-mg once-weekly (QW) is switched to dulaglutide 3.0- or 4.5-mg QW via exposure-response modelling. METHODS: HbA1c and body weight time-course models were developed and validated with data from the SUSTAIN 1 to 10 trials for semaglutide and the AWARD-11 trial for dulaglutide. Simulations were conducted for HbA1c and body weight over 52 weeks. In the initial 26 weeks, semaglutide was initiated at 0.25-mg and titrated to 0.5- or 1.0-mg QW via 4-weekly stepwise titration, followed by 26 weeks of dulaglutide initiated at 0.75- or 1.5-mg QW and escalated to 3.0- or 4.5-mg QW via 4-weekly stepwise titration. RESULTS: At 26 weeks, model-predicted mean changes from baseline in HbA1c and weight for semaglutide 0.5 mg were up to -1.55% and -3.44 kg, respectively. After switching to dulaglutide 3.0 mg, further reductions were 0.19% and 1.40 kg, respectively, at 52 weeks. Predicted mean HbA1c and weight changes for semaglutide 1.0 mg at 26 weeks were -1.84% and -4.96 kg, respectively; after switching to dulaglutide 4.5 mg, HbA1c was maintained with additional weight reduction of up to 0.57 kg at 52 weeks. Glycaemic control was preserved when switching from semaglutide 1.0 mg to dulaglutide 3.0 mg. CONCLUSION: Switching from semaglutide 0.5 mg to dulaglutide 3.0 or 4.5 mg with dose escalation potentially yields additional HbA1c and weight reductions; switching from semaglutide 1.0 mg to dulaglutide 4.5 mg may enhance weight loss.

Efficacy and safety outcomes of dulaglutide by baseline HbA1c: A post hoc analysis of the REWIND trial.

AIM: To assess cardiovascular, glycaemic, weight and safety outcomes of long-term treatment with dulaglutide 1.5 mg compared with placebo in patients with a baseline HbA1c of less than 7% versus 7% or higher. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intention-to-treat analyses were performed on REWIND participants with a baseline HbA1c measurement, using Cox proportional hazards regression and mixed model for repeated measures. Subgroup analyses with factors for baseline HbA1c categories and their interaction with treatment group, as well as analyses within the HbA1c subgroups, were conducted. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were performed for baseline HbA1c subgroups of 6.5% or less and more than 6.5%. RESULTS: Of the 9876 eligible participants, 3921 and 5955 had a baseline HbA1c of less than 7% and 7% or higher, respectively. Mean baseline HbA1c was 6.3% and 8.0% and the mean duration of diabetes was 9.0 and 11.6 years in the respective subgroups. The less than 7% subgroup was slightly older and less frequently insulin-treated. There was no evidence of a differential dulaglutide treatment effect on body mass index (BMI) reduction, cardiovascular or safety outcomes of interest between the baseline HbA1c subgroups. Treatment-by-baseline HbA1c group interaction was significant for HbA1c change from baseline (P < .001), with a greater reduction in the subgroup with higher baseline HbA1c values. Sensitivity analyses by baseline HbA1c subgroups of 6.5% or less and more than 6.5% showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced incidence of cardiovascular events, and the reduction in BMI in participants treated with once-weekly dulaglutide, were independent of the baseline HbA1c level. Conversely, participants with a higher baseline HbA1c level had greater reductions in HbA1c. Dulaglutide has a positive benefit-risk profile and can be considered in patients with comparatively well-controlled HbA1c levels seeking optimal metabolic control and cardiovascular benefits.

Effect of expanded dulaglutide weekly doses (3.0 mg and 4.5 mg) on cardiovascular disease risk factors in participants with type 2 diabetes at increased cardiovascular disease risk: a post hoc analysis of the AWARD-11 study.

AIMS: This post hoc analysis investigated the effect of dulaglutide on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in subgroups of participants at increased CVD risk in the AWARD-11 study. METHODS: Participants who received once weekly dulaglutide 1.5, 3.0 or 4.5 mg for 52 weeks were categorized according to their baseline Framingham CVD risk category [low (N = 295), medium (N = 481) and high (N = 1054) risk], as well as their baseline CVD risk according to the REWIND study eligibility criteria (N = 953). Serum lipids and vital signs were assessed at baseline and at 52 weeks. Data were analysed as least squares mean percentage change from baseline for lipids and least squares mean change from baseline for vital signs. RESULTS: Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were balanced across doses within the CVD risk groups. In the high Framingham CVD risk and REWIND-like groups, dulaglutide resulted in dose-related decreases in total cholesterol (≤6.0%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (≤8.8%), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (≤19.4%) and triglycerides (≤21.5%), with little change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased up to 5.6 mmHg and 1.6 mmHg, respectively, and heart rate increased up to 2 beats/min. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis suggests the magnitude of the favourable effects of dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg on several cardiometabolic CVD risk factors was similar to, if not greater than, those of dulaglutide 1.5 mg among participants with type 2 diabetes and increased CVD risk. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT03495102.

Dulaglutide and incident atrial fibrillation or flutter in patients with type 2 diabetes: A post hoc analysis from the REWIND randomized trial.

AIM: To assess the occurrence of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (atrial arrhythmias [AA]) in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with once-weekly subcutaneous dulaglutide versus placebo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients without electrocardiographic (ECG)-confirmed AA at baseline and randomized in the REWIND trial were assessed for the development of AA based on an annual ECG. Additional analyses included whether dulaglutide compared with placebo reduced the composite outcome of AA or death, AA or cardiovascular death, AA or stroke and AA or heart failure. RESULTS: Among 9543 participants (mean age 66 ± 7 years, with cardiovascular risk factors and 31% with previous cardiovascular disease) without AA at entry in the trial, 524 patients (5.5%) had at least one episode of AA during the median 5.4 years of follow-up. Incident AA occurred in 269 of the 4769 participants allocated to dulaglutide (5.6%), at a rate of 10.7 per 1000 person-years, versus 255 of the 4774 allocated to placebo (5.3%), at a rate of 10.5 per 1000 person-years (P = .59). There was also no effect of dulaglutide on the composite outcome of AA and death or AA and heart failure. CONCLUSION: This post hoc analysis of data from the REWIND trial showed that treatment with dulaglutide was not associated with a reduced incidence of AA in this at-risk group of patients with type 2 diabetes.