Effect of spectacle correction on hyperopic children.

Background: Hyperopia is a significant refractive error in children, often leading to vision impairment. This study aimed to investigate whether partial or full spectacle correction is benefit for hyperopia in preschool-aged children. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on hyperopic children visited to teaching medical center outpatient clinic between October 2011 and October 2018, and were categorized into three groups: full correction, overcorrection, and undercorrection. The study was approved by the institutional ethical committee of Tri-Service General Hospital. Results: Following a minimum of one-year follow-up period, no statistically significant differences were observed in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) among children receiving full, over, or under spectacle correction. Notably, the overcorrection group exhibited a significant reduction in spherical equivalent (SE) compared to both the full and under correction groups, indicating a better SE with spectacle overcorrection. Conclusions: Spectacle overcorrection may offer potential benefits for enhancing SE in preschool children with hyperopia. Nevertheless, further investigation through randomized controlled trials is warranted to establish the validity of this approach and its impact on visual outcomes in this hyperopic pediatric population.

The effects of refractive status on the outcomes of strabismus surgery in patients with esotropia.

BACKGROUND: The success of the strabismus surgery can hinge on several factors. One of these factors is refractive condition like hyperopia or myopia. Our study seeks to evaluate the surgical outcomes in patients with esotropia and myopia. METHODS: This case-control study encompassed all surgical cases of esotropia at Torfe and Negah Hospital between 2016 and 2021, which satisfied our specified inclusion criteria. The initial variables from electronic medical records were collected, including demographic, clinical, and surgery-related factors. At the final follow-up appointment, the level of eye deviation, both at distance and near, was recorded. We considered the operation a "success" for patients with a post-surgery distance eye deviation of 10(Pd) or less. Patients with greater deviation were classified as surgery failure. Statistical analyses were executed using SPSS software (version 16.0), and a P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 194 patients evaluated, 112 were incorporated into the study. Surgical failure was observed in 14.29% of myopic patients, 29.79% of hyperopic patients, and 31.82% of emmetropic patients. The myopia group displayed a 0.19 odd ratio for surgical failure compared to the combined hyperopia and emmetropia groups, not statistically significant (OR: 0.19, CI 95%: 0.03-1.02). Additionally, patients diagnosed with Lateral Rectus Under-action were found to be 6.85 times more likely to experience surgery failure(OR: 6.85, CI 95%: 1.52-30.94). An elevated risk of surgical failure was also identified in patients who underwent Inferior Oblique Weakening procedure, indicated by a 3.77-fold increase in the odds ratio for failure(OR: 3.77, CI 95%: 1.08-13.17). CONCLUSION: In our study, despite numerical disparities, there was no statistical difference among the success rates of all esotropia patients with different refractive errors. The patients with LRUA or IOOA showed lower success rates. Myopic patients had higher post-op overcorrection with lower reoperation rates compared to hyperopic or emmetropic patients.

[Quantitative comparison of binocular suppression of patients with anisometropic amblyopia and ametropic amblyopia].

Objective: To explore the differences in clinical characteristics and interocular interactions between patients with anisometropic amblyopia and ametropic amblyopia. Methods: Cross-sectional study. The newly diagnosed anisometropic (the binocular difference in spherical equivalent≥1.00 D) amblyopia patients and ametropic amblyopia patients (aged 4 to 6 years) in Beijing Tongren Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were involved. Patients were further categorized by the refractive status after cycloplegia, including hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism, hyperopia with astigmatism, myopia with astigmatism, mild anisometropia and severe anisometropia. Quantitative measurements of best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR), stereoacuity (transformed to log units), perceptual eye position and interocular suppression were performed, and the differences between groups were analyzed. The rank sum test was used for statistical evaluation. Results: The average age of 45 ametropic amblyopia patients (21 males and 24 females) and 84 anisometropic amblyopia patients (48 males and 36 females) was 5.0 (4.0, 5.0) years and 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) years, respectively. The interocular differences in spherical equivalent [2.56 (1.50, 4.19) D vs. 0.25 (0.13, 0.56) D] and best-corrected visual acuity [0.40 (0.18, 0.70) logMAR vs. 0.07 (0.00, 0.12) logMAR] were larger in patients with anisometropic amblyopia than those with ametropic amblyopia. The anisometropic amblyopia patients had worse stereoacuity [2.60 (2.00, 2.90) log arcsec vs. 2.00 (2.00, 2.30) log arcsec] and deeper suppression [20.0% (13.3%, 40.0%) vs. 10.0% (0, 23.3%)], compared with the ametropic amblyopia patients. The differences were all statistically significant (P<0.05). The suppression and stereoacuity between patients with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia [suppression, 30.0% (17.5%, 50.0%); stereoacuity, 2.90 (2.30, 2.90) log arcsec] and astigmatic anisometropic amblyopia [suppression, 10.0% (0, 20.0%); stereoacuity, 2.00 (2.00, 2.30) log arcsec] were significantly different (P<0.05). The differences of suppression and stereoacuity between patients with severe (binocular difference in spherical equivalent>2.50 D) [suppression, 30.0% (20.0%, 53.3%); stereoacuity, 2.90 (2.57, 2.90) log arcsec] and mild anisometropia [suppression, 20.0% (0, 30.0%); stereoacuity, 2.00 (2.00, 2.90) log arcsec] were also statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: Patients with anisometropic amblyopia have deeper binocular suppression, worse stereoacuity and more severe binocular interaction abnormality than those with ametropic amblyopia. The severity of anisometropia affects the degree of the interaction abnormality.

Impact of Refractive Outcomes on Bias in Follow-up and Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Laser Vision Correction.

PURPOSE: To examine factors contributing to completion of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in patients undergoing laser vision correction. DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based study. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who underwent primary laser vision correction with a target of plano from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016, at a large refractive surgery center. METHODS: Patients were asked to complete a PRO measure at the time of their preoperative and months 1 and 3 postoperative visits. Characteristics between patients who attended and did not attend the follow-up visits and completed and did not complete the PRO measure were compared. A logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with likelihood of follow-up and completion of PRO measure. An inverse probability censoring weighted model was created to account for selective loss to follow-up and used to adjust the PRO satisfaction measure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Completion of the PRO measure at 1 and 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 37 043 patients were identified. Of these, 20 501 completed a 1-month postoperative PRO measure and 10 474 completed a 3-month postoperative PRO measure. Patients completing a PRO measure were more likely to be older, be female, have had photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), have completed a preoperative PRO measure, and have had a preoperative hyperopic correction (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). For every line of postoperative uncorrected acuity worse than 20/16, the odds ratio of completing a PRO measure was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.36, P < 0.001) at 1 month and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.26-1.33, P < 0.001) at 3 months. At 1 month, there was no difference between the raw and model-adjusted rates of satisfaction with vision, but at 3 months the adjusted rate was significantly higher than the raw rate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with worse objective visual outcomes were more likely to complete PRO measures in this population-based study. In a setting with loss to follow-up, PRO measures require methods to address missing data for correct interpretation.

Refractive Error and Retinopathy Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between refractive error and diabetic retinopathy (DR). DESIGN: Clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Type I diabetes individuals with serial refractive error and DR stage measurements over 30 years in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) follow-up study. METHODS: Stage of DR was measured every 6 months from standard fundus photographs, and refractive error was measured annually during the 6.5 years of DCCT; then, both were staggered every fourth year during EDIC with the full cohort measured at EDIC years 4 and 10. Outcomes of DR were 2- or 3-step progression, presence of proliferative DR (PDR), clinically significant macular edema (CSME), diabetic macular edema (DME), or ocular surgery. Myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia were defined as a spherical equivalent of ≤-0.5, >-0.5 and <0.5, and ≥0.5, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For each outcome separately, Cox proportional hazard (PH) models assessed the association between the refractive error status and the subsequent risk of that outcome, both without and with adjustment for potential risk factors. RESULTS: Hyperopia was associated with a higher risk of 2-step progression (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.59), 3-step progression (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.73), and PDR (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02-1.92) compared with emmetropia in unadjusted models. These associations remained significant after adjustment for DCCT treatment group, cohort, age, sex, smoking, duration of diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, pulse, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, albumin excretion rate, and DCCT/EDIC mean updated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (2-step progression: HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.03-1.58; 3-step progression: HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.00-1.68; PDR: HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.00-1.90). Myopia was not associated with any of the 5 DR outcomes in the unadjusted models and only marginally associated with 2-step progression (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00-1.24) in the adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Myopia is not associated with DR progression risk. Hyperopia is an independent risk factor for 2-step and 3-step DR progression and PDR.

Spectral composition of artificial illuminants and their effect on eye growth in chicks.

In broadband light, longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) provides emmetropization signals from both wavelength defocus and the resulting chromatic cues. Indoor illuminants vary in their spectral output, potentially limiting the signals from LCA. Our aim is to investigate the effect that artificial illuminants with different spectral outputs have on chick emmetropization with and without low temporal frequency modulation. In Experiment 1, two-week-old chicks were exposed to 0.2 Hz, square-wave luminance modulation for 3 days. There were 4 spectral conditions: LED strips that simulated General Electric (GE) LED "Soft" (n = 13), GE LED "Daylight" (n = 12), a novel "Equal" condition (n = 12), and a novel "High S" condition (n = 10). These conditions were all tested at a mean level of 985 lux. In Experiment 2, the effect of intensity on the "Equal" condition was tested at two other light levels (70 lux: n = 10; 680 lux: n = 7). In Experiment 3, the effect of temporal modulation on the "Equal" condition was tested by comparing the 0.2 Hz condition with 0 Hz (steady). Significant differences were found in axial growth across lighting conditions. At 985 lux, birds exposed to the "Equal" condition showed a greater reduction in axial growth (both p < 0.01) and a greater hyperopic shift compared to "Soft" and "Daylight" (both p < 0.01). The "High S" birds experienced more axial growth compared to "Equal" (p < 0.01) but less than in "Soft" and "Daylight" (p < 0.01). Axial changes in "Equal" were only observed at 985 lux with 0.2 Hz temporal modulation, and not with lower light levels or steady light. We conclude that axial growth and refraction were dependent on the lighting condition in a manner predicted by wavelength defocus signals arising from LCA.

A novel proline substitution (Arg201Pro) in alpha helix 8 of TMEM98 causes autosomal dominant nanophthalmos-4, closed angle glaucoma and attenuated visual acuity.

Nanophthalmos-4 is a rare autosomal dominant disorder caused by two known variations in TMEM98. An Austrian Caucasian pedigree was identified suffering from nanophthalmos and late onset angle-closure glaucoma and premature loss of visual acuity. Whole exome sequencing identified segregation of a c.602G > C transversion in TMEM98 (p.Arg201Pro) as potentially causative. A protein homology model generated showed a TMEM98 structure comprising α4, α5/6, α7 and α8 antiparallel helix bundles and two predicted transmembrane domains in α1 and α7 that have been confirmed in vitro. Both p.Arg201Pro and the two missense variations representing proline insertions identified previously to cause nanophthalmos-4 (p.Ala193Pro and p.His196Pro) are located in the charge polarized helix α8 (p.183-p210). Stability of the C-terminal alpha helical structure of TMEM98 is therefore essential to prevent the development of human nanophthalmos-4. Precise molecular diagnosis could lead to the development of tailored therapies for patients with orphan ocular disease.

Uncorrected Refractive Error and Distance Visual Acuity in Children Aged 6 to 14 Years.

SIGNIFICANCE: This study presents the relationship between distance visual acuity and a range of uncorrected refractive errors, a complex association that is fundamental to clinical eye care and the identification of children needing refractive correction. PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze data from the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error Study to describe the relationship between distance uncorrected refractive error and visual acuity in children. METHODS: Subjects were 2212 children (51.2% female) 6 to 14 years of age (mean ± standard deviation, 10.2 ± 2.1 years) participating in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error Study between 2000 and 2010. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was measured using a high-contrast projected logMAR chart. Cycloplegic refractive error was measured using the Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. The ability of logMAR acuity to detect various categories of refractive error was examined using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Isoacuity curves show that increasing myopic spherical refractive errors, increasing astigmatic refractive errors, or a combination of both reduces distance visual acuity. Visual acuity was reduced by approximately 0.5 minutes of MAR per 0.30 to 0.40 D of spherical refractive error and by approximately 0.5 minutes of MAR per 0.60 to 0.90 D of astigmatism. Higher uncorrected hyperopic refractive error had little effect on distance visual acuity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggests that a logMAR distance acuity of 0.20 to 0.32 provides the best balance between sensitivity and specificity for detecting refractive errors other than hyperopia. Distance acuity alone was ineffective for detecting hyperopic refractive errors. CONCLUSIONS: Higher myopic and/or astigmatic refractive errors were associated with predictable reductions in uncorrected distance visual acuity. The reduction in acuity per diopter of cylindrical error was about half that for spherical myopic error. Although distance acuity may be a useful adjunct to the detection of myopic spherocylindrical refractive errors, accommodation presumably prevents acuity from assisting in the detection of hyperopia. Alternate procedures need to be used to detect hyperopia.

Associations between visual function and magnitude of refractive error for emmetropic to moderately hyperopic 4- and 5-year-old children in the Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate associations between visual function and the level of uncorrected hyperopia in 4- and 5-year-old children without strabismus or amblyopia. METHODS: Children with spherical equivalent (SE) cycloplegic refractive error of -0.75 to +6.00 on eligibility testing for the Vision in Preschoolers-Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) study were included. Children were grouped as emmetropic (<1D SE myopia or hyperopia), low hyperopic (+1 to <+3D SE) or moderate hyperopic (+3 to +6D SE). Children with anisometropia or astigmatism (≥1D), amblyopia or strabismus were excluded. Visual functions assessed were monocular distance visual acuity (VA) and binocular near VA with crowded HOTV charts, accommodative lag using the Monocular Estimation Method and near stereoacuity by 'Preschool Assessment of Stereopsis with a Smile'. Visual functions were compared as continuous measures among refractive error groups. RESULTS: 554 children (mean age 58 months) were included in the analysis. Mean SE (SD) {N} for emmetropia, low and moderate hyperopia were +0.52D (0.49) {N = 270}, +2.18D (0.57) {N = 171} and +3.95D (0.78) {N = 113}, respectively. There was a consistent trend of poorer visual function with increasing hyperopia (p < 0.001). Although all children had age-normal distance VA, logMAR (Snellen) VA of 0.00 (6/6) or better was achieved (distance, near) among more emmetropic (52%, 26%) and low hyperopic (47%, 15%) children than moderate hyperopes (25%, 9%). Mean (SD) distance logMAR VA declined from emmetropic 0.05 (0.10), to low hyperopic 0.06 (0.10) to moderately hyperopic children 0.12 (0.11) (p < 0.001); A mild progressive decrease in near VA also was observed from the emmetropic 0.13 (0.11) to low hyperopic 0.15 (0.10) to moderate hyperopic 0.19 (0.11) groups, (p < 0.001). Accommodative responses showed an increased lag with increasing hyperopia (ρ = 0.50, p < 0.001). Median near stereoacuity for emmetropes, low and moderate hyperopes was 40, 60 and 120 sec arc, respectively. The percentage of these groups with no reduced near visual functions was 83%, 61%, and 34%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing visual function was associated with increasing hyperopia in 4- and 5-year-olds without strabismus or amblyopia. As hyperopia with reduced visual function has been associated with early literacy deficits, near visual function should be evaluated in these children.

Power profiles of centre-distance multifocal soft contact lenses.

PURPOSE: Centre-distance multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs) for myopia control are thought to slow myopia progression by providing both clear foveal vision and myopic defocus. Characterising the power profile of lenses is important to understanding their possible effects on retinal defocus when worn. The power profiles of three commercially available MFCLs were determined. METHODS: Three centre-distance MFCL designs were studied: Biofinity Multifocal D +2.50 add (comfilcon A), Proclear Multifocal D +2.50 add (omafilcon A), and NaturalVue Multifocal (etafilcon A). Two lenses each in power from -1.00D to -6.00D in 1D steps were stored in ISO 18369-3:2017 standard phosphate buffered saline for 24 h. Optical power profiles were measured in a wet cell with the SHSOphthalmic profiler accounting for centre thickness and manufacturer-reported material refractive index. Sagittal power maps from the SHSOphthalmic were exported, and custom MATLAB code was used to generate power profiles by averaging along the vertical and horizontal meridians. One-way anova with Tukey's HSD post-hoc t-tests were used to analyse maximum add power by lens design. RESULTS: Plus power increased out from the lens centre for all three MFCLs. Power profiles of Biofinity D and Proclear D MFCLs show three distinct areas within the optic zone; the distance zone (from lens centre to about 1.6 mm radius), intermediate zone (about 1.6 mm radius to 2.1 mm) and near zone (about 2 mm radius to 4 mm). For NaturalVue MFCLs, plus power starts increasing almost immediately from the lens centre, reaching maximum measured mean plus power at a radius of 2.7 mm. From 2.7 mm to 3.0 mm, there was a decrease in plus power, which was then generally maintained out to the optic zone edge. Across all lens powers, maximum add power was highest with the NaturalVue MFCL (+3.32 ± 0.44D), then Proclear D (+1.84 ± 0.28D) and Biofinity D (+1.47 ± 0.34D) MFCLs (all p < 0.04). Add power peaked at different locations for different lens powers and designs. CONCLUSIONS: Power profiles of MFCLs vary based on lens design and power. These power profiles are consistent with reported myopic and hyperopic changes in peripheral refraction with MFCLs and provide some explanation for reported differences in peripheral refraction with these MFCLs. Further work is needed to determine whether these power profile differences influence myopia progression.

Effectiveness of vergence/accommodative therapy for accommodative dysfunction in children with convergence insufficiency.

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy for improving accommodative amplitude and accommodative facility in children with symptomatic convergence insufficiency and accommodative dysfunction. METHODS: We report changes in accommodative function following therapy among participants in the Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial - Attention and Reading Trial with decreased accommodative amplitude (115 participants in vergence/accommodative therapy; 65 in placebo therapy) or decreased accommodative facility (71 participants in vergence/accommodative therapy; 37 in placebo therapy) at baseline. The primary analysis compared mean change in amplitude and facility between the vergence/accommodative and placebo therapy groups using analyses of variance models after 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks of treatment. The proportions of participants with normal amplitude and facility at each time point were calculated. The average rate of change in amplitude and facility from baseline to week 4, and from weeks 4 to 16, were determined in the vergence/accommodative therapy group. RESULTS: From baseline to 16 weeks, the mean improvement in amplitude was 8.6 dioptres (D) and 5.2 D in the vergence/accommodative and placebo therapy groups, respectively (mean difference = 3.5 D, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5 to 5.5 D; p = 0.01). The mean improvement in facility was 13.5 cycles per minute (cpm) and 7.6 cpm in the vergence/accommodative and placebo therapy groups, respectively (mean difference = 5.8 cpm, 95% CI: 3.8 to 7.9 cpm; p < 0.0001). Significantly greater proportions of participants treated with vergence/accommodative therapy achieved a normal amplitude (69% vs. 32%, difference = 37%, 95% CI: 22 to 51%; p < 0.0001) and facility (85% vs. 49%, difference = 36%, 95% CI: 18 to 55%; p < 0.0001) than those who received placebo therapy. In the vergence/accommodative therapy group, amplitude increased at an average rate of 1.5 D per week during the first 4 weeks (p < 0.0001), then slowed to 0.2 D per week (p = 0.002) from weeks 4 to 16. Similarly, facility increased at an average rate of 1.5 cpm per week during the first 4 weeks (p < 0.0001), then slowed to 0.6 cpm per week from weeks 4 to 16 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Office-based vergence/accommodative therapy is effective for improving accommodative function in children with symptomatic convergence insufficiency and coexisting accommodative dysfunction.

Longitudinal analysis of axial length growth in a German cohort of healthy children and adolescents.

PURPOSE: To generate continuous growth curves for axial length (AL) in German children. We hypothesise that percentile curves of AL can be used as a predictive measure of myopia. METHODS: In this longitudinal and cross-sectional LIFE Child Study, children's non-cycloplegic refraction data was collected using the Zeiss i.Profiler plus while AL was measured using the Haag-Streit Lenstar. Reference growth curves were estimated as a continuous non-parametric function of age. RESULTS: Data from 4511 visits of 1965 participants (1021 boys and 944 girls) between 3 and 18 years of age were analysed. For all ages and percentiles, the estimated AL was higher in boys than girls. AL differences between boys and girls were most pronounced in the 98th percentile at 3 years of age, being 0.93 mm longer eyes in boys. This difference decreased to 0.21 mm at 18 years of age. While the lower percentiles of AL reach their final value around age 13, the 50th percentile was still increasing by 0.05 mm per year until the end of the observation period. While, in general, children with longer eyes are more likely to develop myopia, this relationship is weaker between the ages of 5 and 8. CONCLUSION: The LIFE Child Study data provides European AL data. In both Germany and China, AL has comparable growth rates when the baseline ALs are compared as percentiles. Thus, percentile curves of AL can be used as a predictive measure for the likelihood of developing as well as the progression of myopia.

Using the posterior to anterior corneal curvature radii ratio to minimize the risk of a postoperative hyperopic shift after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate different corneal parameters in identifying patients at risk of a hyperopic shift after (DMEK). METHODS: This retrospective study included 92 eyes of patients with FECD after DMEK surgery. Pachymetry parameters, various tomographic parameters and densitometry values before and after DMEK were determined using a rotating Scheimpflug system (Pentacam HR, Oculus). For assessing the posterior to anterior corneal curvature relationship, we calculated the RPA (posterior to anterior corneal curvature radii ratio). RESULTS: The average keratometry reading of the posterior corneal surface (KmB) increased and the total corneal refractive power (TCRP) decreased significantly after surgery (P < .001). There was a significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative RPA (P < .001) and the posterior Q value (P < .001). The strongest correlation was found between the change in the KmB and the preoperative RPA (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.872, P < .001). In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the highest AUC values (for ∆KmB) among the different preoperative parameters tested were obtained for RPA and posterior Q value (Asph. QB) with AUROC (area under the ROC) values of 0.95 and 0.89, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Q value and the RPA showed the highest correlation with the change in corneal refractive power and the greatest AUC. These parameters could be used as surrogate markers to identify eyes that might be at risk of a greater postoperative hyperopic shift, which would allow more accurate setting of refractive goals.

Diffractive trifocal lens implantation with or without excimer laser enhancement: is a touch-up procedure a negative predictor for refractive and subjective outcome?

PURPOSE: To investigate the refractive results of a LASIK enhancement and its impact on treatment safety, efficacy, predictability and patient reported outcome in eyes after clear lens extraction and diffractive trifocal lens implantation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort multicentre study of Care Vision Refractive Centres in Germany compared two groups of patients. Group 1 consisted of eyes that had non-toric MIOL surgery only, whereas group 2 had a consecutive laser enhancement after 3 months follow-up. Refractive and subjective results of the two groups were compared. Patient reported outcome measurements were assessed by using a 30-item questionnaire with four subscales. (Spectacle Dependence, Eye Comfort, Freedom and Looking/Feeling Well). Refractive results were reported following standard reporting in refractive surgery. RESULTS: 139 eyes of 79 patients were included in which either MIOL surgery or MIOL surgery plus LASIK enhancement had been performed between January and December 2017. UDVA reached 0.1logMAR (0.8; 20/25) in 94% in group 2 and 85% in group 1. Compared to preoperative CDVA no change in Snellen lines of CDVA was shown in 89% in group 1 and in 93% in group 2. Spectacle dependence (P = 0.41), eye comfort (P = 0.15), freedom (P = 0.48) and looking/feeling well (P = 0.45) showed no statistically significant difference between both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with residual ametropia after MIOL implantation, LASIK provides a reliable, safe and efficient way to achieve the desired refractive outcome and patient satisfaction. We recommend performing Laser enhancement at 3 months after MIOL implantation (Bioptics) in trifocal MIOL patients that benefit from improvement of residual ametropia.

Intraocular pressure changes and corneal biomechanics after hyperopic small-incision lenticule extraction.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer (Corvis ST), a non-contact tonometer, and an ocular response analyzer after hyperopic small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: Thirteen patients who underwent hyperopic SMILE in one eye were enrolled prospectively. IOP and corneal biomechanical parameters were measured preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively with a non-contact tonometer (IOPNCT), Corvis ST (biomechanical corrected IOP [bIOP]), and ocular response analyzer (Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure [IOPg] and cornea compensated IOP [IOPcc]). A linear mixed model was used to compare the IOPs and biomechanical values among methods at each time point. RESULTS: IOPNCT, IOPg, and IOPcc dropped significantly after surgery, with the amplitude being 3.15 ± 0.48 mmHg, 5.49 ± 0.94 mmHg, and 4.34 ± 0.97 mmHg, respectively, at the last follow-up visit. IOPNCT decreased by 0.11 ± 0.06 mmHg per µm of excised central corneal thickness. bIOP did not change significantly after surgery. Preoperatively, no difference was found among the four measurements (P > 0.05). Postoperatively, IOPNCT and bIOP were higher than IOPg and IOPcc. bIOP was independent of cornea thickness at last follow-up visit, whereas it correlated significantly with corneal biomechanics similar to the other three IOP values. CONCLUSION: bIOP is a relative accurate measure of IOP after hyperopic SMILE.

Chick Eyes Can Recover from Lens Compensation without Visual Cues.

SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that nonvisual mechanism(s) can guide chick eyes to recover from myopia or hyperopia bidirectionally to regain their age-matched length. Because eye growth control is phylogenetically conserved across many species, it is possible that, in general, emmetropization mechanisms are not exclusively based on a local visual feedback system. PURPOSE: Across species, growing eyes compensate for imposed defocus by modifying their growth, showing the visual controls on eye growth and emmetropization. When the spectacle lens is removed, the eyes rapidly recover back to a normal size similar to that in the untreated eyes. We asked whether this recovery process was dependent on visual feedback or whether it might be guided by intrinsic nonvisual mechanisms. METHODS: Chicks wore either a +7 (n = 16) or -7 D (n = 16) lens over one eye for 4 to 7 days; the fellow eye was left untreated. After lens removal, half were recovered in darkness and half in white light. Refractive error and ocular dimensions were measured before and after lens treatment and after recovery with a Hartinger refractometer and A-scan biometer, respectively. RESULTS: Whereas chick eyes completely recovered from prior lens treatment under normal light after 2 days, they also partially recovered from prior hyperopia (by 60%) and myopia (by 69%) after being kept in darkness for 3 days: a +7 and -7 D lens induced a difference between the eyes of +7.08 and -4.69 D, respectively. After recovery in darkness, the eyes recovered by 3.18 and 2.88 D, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of visual cues, anisometropic eyes can modify and reverse their growth to regain a similar length to their fellow untreated eye. Because eye growth control is phylogenetically conserved across many species, it is possible that nonvisual mechanisms may contribute more generally to emmetropization and that recovery from anisometropic refractive errors may not be wholly visually controlled.

Accommodative Behavior, Hyperopic Defocus, and Retinal Image Quality in Children Viewing Electronic Displays.

SIGNIFICANCE: The prevalence of myopia and use of electronic displays by children has grown rapidly in recent years. We found that children viewing electronic displays, however, experience hyperopic defocus levels similar to those previously reported for other stimuli. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare accommodative behavior of nonmyopic and myopic children viewing a computer screen or mobile phone. METHODS: Accommodative behavior was examined in 11 nonmyopic and 8 myopic children (11.32 ± 2.90 and 14.13 ± 2.30 years, respectively; P = .04; refractions, +0.51 ± 0.51 and -2.54 ± 1.29, respectively) using an open-field autorefractor (Grand Seiko) at target vergences from -0.25 to -5.00 D. Different size (scaled or nonscaled) and type (text or movie) stimuli were presented on an LCD monitor (distant) or an iPhone (near), with subjects viewing monocularly or binocularly in an illuminated or dark room. RESULTS: At the typical reading distances (20 and 33 cm), all 19 children exhibited some amount of accommodative lag. Stimulus type had little impact on accommodation. However, slightly but statistically significant lower slopes were observed (Bonferroni-corrected significance level of P ≤ .01) for low room lighting (0.96 vs. 0.91; t test, t = 3.88; P = .003), nonscaled targets (0.99 vs. 0.92; t test, t = 4.28; P = .001), and monocular viewing (0.99 vs. 0.90; t test, t = 4.0; P = .002) in the nonmyopic group only. When viewing nonscaled stimuli binocularly (natural viewing), the means and standard deviations of accommodative lags (averaged across room lights on and off, and text and movie) were generally larger for the nonmyopes at all distances and were largest at 33 cm (0.73 ± 0.18 D for the nonmyopes and 0.49 ± 0.23 for the myopes; t test, t = 2.62; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Generally small (≤0.50 D) amounts of hyperopic defocus are present in children binocularly viewing handheld electronic devices (nonmyopes slightly more than myopes). Modern electronic devices do not expose children to unusually high levels of hyperopic defocus.

Ocular axial length and straylight.

PURPOSE: Straylight refers to an optical phenomenon that takes places in the eye and leads to a deterioration of the retinal image. Past clinical findings suggest an increase of straylight with the eye's axial length, but the aetiology of the phenomenon was unclear. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate, through raytracing, simple geometrical optics, and the well-established inverse-angle square law for the angular distribution of straylight, why straylight increases when a myopic eye is corrected with spectacles. METHODS: The angular dependence of straylight is investigated using geometrical optics. An expression relating the eye's 2nd nodal point, the ocular axial length and the eye's straylight parameter S is found. Subsequently, using a model of the human eye, the location of the 2nd nodal point is computed using ray tracing for different axial lengths and refractive corrections. Finally, the results are compared against psychophysical data for the straylight parameter, corrected for the subject's age. RESULTS: When correcting axial myopia using spectacles, the eye's 2nd nodal point shifts towards the retina and away from the scattering plane, leading to an increase in straylight. Meanwhile, straylight should theoretically decrease in hyperopic eyes. Contact lenses keep the 2nd nodal point relative stable, leading to a very minor change in straylight with axial length. Our model has shown good agreement with previously taken straylight measurements in real eyes, explaining the observed change of straylight with ocular axial length. CONCLUSION: We proposed an explanation for the underlying optical mechanism for the clinically observed increase of straylight with axial myopia, when corrected with glasses. Our model predicts that the increase can be as high as 0.12 log units for a myopic eye with 10 dioptres, which agrees with prior observations.

Lower sensitivity to peripheral hypermetropic defocus due to higher order ocular aberrations.

PURPOSE: Many myopia control interventions are designed to induce myopic relative peripheral refraction. However, myopes tend to show asymmetries in their sensitivity to defocus, seeing better with hypermetropic rather than myopic defocus. This study aims to determine the influence of chromatic aberrations (CA) and higher-order monochromatic aberrations (HOA) in the peripheral asymmetry to defocus. METHODS: Peripheral (20° nasal visual field) low-contrast (10%) resolution acuity of nine subjects (four myopes, four emmetropes, one hypermetrope) was evaluated under induced myopic and hypermetropic defocus between ±5 D, under four conditions: (a) Peripheral Best Sphere and Cylinder (BSC) correction in white light; (b) Peripheral BSC correction + CA elimination (green light); (c) Peripheral BSC correction + HOA correction in white light; and (d) Peripheral BSC correction + CA elimination + HOA correction. No cycloplegia was used, and all measurements were repeated three times. RESULTS: The slopes of the peripheral acuity as a function of positive and negative defocus differed, especially when the natural HOA and CA were present. This asymmetry was quantified as the average of the absolute sum of positive and negative defocus slopes for all subjects (AVS). The AVS was 0.081 and 0.063 logMAR/D for white and green light respectively, when the ocular HOA were present. With adaptive optics correction for HOA, the asymmetry reduced to 0.021 logMAR/D for white and 0.031 logMAR/D for green light, mainly because the sensitivity to hypermetropic defocus increased when HOA were corrected. CONCLUSION: The asymmetry was only slightly affected by the elimination of the CA of the eye, whereas adaptive optics correction for HOA reduced the asymmetry. The HOA mainly affected the sensitivity to hypermetropic defocus.

Optimizing virtual reality for all users through gaze-contingent and adaptive focus displays.

From the desktop to the laptop to the mobile device, personal computing platforms evolve over time. Moving forward, wearable computing is widely expected to be integral to consumer electronics and beyond. The primary interface between a wearable computer and a user is often a near-eye display. However, current generation near-eye displays suffer from multiple limitations: they are unable to provide fully natural visual cues and comfortable viewing experiences for all users. At their core, many of the issues with near-eye displays are caused by limitations in conventional optics. Current displays cannot reproduce the changes in focus that accompany natural vision, and they cannot support users with uncorrected refractive errors. With two prototype near-eye displays, we show how these issues can be overcome using display modes that adapt to the user via computational optics. By using focus-tunable lenses, mechanically actuated displays, and mobile gaze-tracking technology, these displays can be tailored to correct common refractive errors and provide natural focus cues by dynamically updating the system based on where a user looks in a virtual scene. Indeed, the opportunities afforded by recent advances in computational optics open up the possibility of creating a computing platform in which some users may experience better quality vision in the virtual world than in the real one.