Prevalence and factors associated with faecal impaction in the Spanish old population.

Background: Faecal impaction (FI) is a common problem in old people living in nursing home. Its prevalence and associated factors remain unknown in the general population. Aim: To evaluate FI prevalence in the Spanish population older than 65 years and to assess the factors associated with it. Methods: A telephone survey was carried out of a Spanish population older than 65 years random sample (N = 1000). FI was assessed using a previously validated questionnaire. Results: A total of 28,128 calls were made; 1,431 subjects were eligible and 1,000 subjects were enrollled, mean aged 74.6 ± 7.3 (65­97); 57.5% were women. At least 53 people reported FI within the past year (5.3% (CI 95%: 3.9­6.7%)). Only 0.03% met criteria for chronic constipation and faecal incontinence. FI-associated factors were constipation, female gender, reduced physical activity, and chronic renal failure (CRF). Conclusion: FI is a prevalent problem in old Spanish population. Constipation and female gender are the main associated factors; low physical activity and CRF appear to play also a significant role. Further studies are required to confirm this association.

Anal Sphincters Evaluation by Endoanal Ultrasound in Obstructed Defecation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate anal sphincter abnormalities detected by endoanal ultrasound in obstructed defecation due to rectocele and rectal intussusception. METHODS: The retrospective analysis includes 45 patients with obstructed defecation syndrome due to rectocele and/or rectal intussusception with or without fecal incontinence, and submitted to endoanal ultrasound. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent (n = 42) were women (mean age of 63 ± 12 years), and 47% (n = 21) of the patients had fecal incontinence. In total, 29% (n = 13) had a previous anorectal surgery, and 93% (n = 39) of the women had a previous vaginal delivery. An isolated rectal intussusception was diagnosed in 20% (n = 9) of the patients, an isolated rectocele in 24% (n = 11), and rectal intussusception and rectocele in 56% (n = 25). Thirty-six percent of patients had anal sphincter lacerations (n = 16): 12% (n = 2) had only internal laceration, 69% (n = 11) had only external laceration, and 19% (n = 3) had both. Two patients had a thinner internal anal sphincter with 0.9 and 1.2 mm, respectively. In total, 25% of the patients without fecal incontinence had an occult anal sphincter laceration, and all were women with an external sphincter laceration in the anterior quadrant and a previous vaginal delivery. In patients with obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence, 48% had sphincter lacerations. Previous anorectal surgery was a predictor of anal sphincter laceration (odds ratio [OR] 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.214-18.971; P = .025), but fecal incontinence (OR 2.7; 95% CI = 0.774-9.613; P = .119) and previous vaginal delivery (OR 1.250; 95% CI = 0.104-15.011; P = .860) were not. CONCLUSIONS: Endoanal ultrasound should be considered in obstructed defecation with or without fecal incontinence, especially if surgical correction is planned.

Fecal impaction: a systematic review of its medical complications.

BACKGROUND: Fecal impaction (FI) is a common problem in the elderly and other at-risk groups, such as patients with a neuro-psychiatric disease. It has been associated with medical problems and high morbi-mortality. A systematic review of this topic might be useful to improve the knowledge in this area and helpful to make an appropriate and early diagnosis. METHODS: A PubMed systematic search was performed using relevant keywords. Case reports published in English, Spanish or French till June 2014 were included if they had a diagnosis of FI and a medical complication secondary to it. Each case was classified based on its principal complication. The main objective is to create a classification of FI complications based on published clinical cases. RESULTS: 188 articles met inclusion criteria, comprising 280 clinical cases. Out of the total, 43,5% were over 65 years old, 49% suffered from chronic constipation, 29% had an underlying neuropsychiatric disease and 15% were hospitalised or institutionalised. A total of 346 medical complications secondary to FI were collected. They were divided according to gastrointestinal tract involvement and then classified based on their anatomical and pathophysiological mechanism into three groups: Complications secondary to fecaloma effect on the intestinal wall (73.4%), on the intestinal lumen (14%) and on adjacent structures (12.6%). CONCLUSIONS: FI causes complications that might be fatal. The elderly, underlying neuropsychiatric disease and hospitalised or institutionalised patients integrate the high-risk group in which FI must be suspected. The first FI complications classification is presented to improve the knowledge about this entity.

Differences in Symptom Severity and Quality of Life in Patients With Obstructive Defecation and Colonic Inertia.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how obstructive defecation and colonic inertia symptoms contribute to constipation-related quality of life. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the differences in quality of life in patients with severe obstructive defecation and colonic inertia symptoms. DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective database. SETTING: Patients were enrolled at a single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: We included consecutive adults with severe symptoms of obstructive defecation (n = 115) or colonic inertia (n = 90) as measured by the Constipation Severity Instrument. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Constipation-Related Quality of Life instrument, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and 12-item Short Form Health Survey. RESULTS: Although physical examination and anorectal physiology testing were similar between groups, patients with severe obstructive defecation symptoms reported worse pain, distress, and constipation-specific quality of life than patients with severe colonic inertia symptoms (all p < 0.001). Specifically, patients with severe obstructive defecation symptoms showed greater quality-of-life impairment related to eating, bathroom habits, and social functioning (all p ≤ 0.01). Furthermore, patients with severe obstructive defecation symptoms had inferior global quality of life on the 12-item Short Form Health Survey physical component score (p = 0.03) and mental component score (p = 0.06). LIMITATIONS: The use of patient self-report instruments resulted in a proportion of patients with incomplete data. CONCLUSION: Quality of life was impaired in both groups of patients; however, patients with severe obstructive defecation symptoms were affected to a significantly greater extent. The fact that there were no differences in objective findings on physical examination or anorectal physiology studies highlights the importance of assessing quality of life during the evaluation and treatment of constipated patients.

A case of giant fecaloma in a 24-year-old woman.

Chronic constipation is a very common complaint at outpatient clinics. It can progress to fecal impaction, and rarely to fecalomas if not managed promptly. Fecaloma is characterized by a hardened large mass of feces frequently localized in sigmoid colon and rectum and is difficult to discharge. Fecaliths, stagnating and hardening by time, may cause intestinal obstruction,ulcer development and colonic wall perforation. We present the case of a 24-year-old woman who admitted to our hospital with complaints of severe constipation with 1 bowel movement every third-fifth day with passage of hard stools only with using laxatives and meteorism. This is a rare case of fecalomas and megacolon, when conservative measures were absolutely ineffective and surgical treatment was needed. Therefore, diagnosis of fecaloma must be considered in patients presenting with chronic constipation and abdominal mass.Further investigations are mandatory to delineate guidelines for clinical management of megacolon especially in women of childbearing age.

Stapled transanal rectal resection with contour transtar for obstructed defecation syndrome: lessons learned after more than 3 years of single-center activity.

BACKGROUND: Obstructed defecation syndrome is a widespread and disabling disease. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stapled transanal rectal resection performed with a new dedicated curved device in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome. DESIGN: A retrospective review of 187 stapled transanal rectal resections performed from June 2007 to February 2011 was conducted. SETTINGS: The entire study was conducted at a university hospital. PATIENTS: : All the patients with symptomatic obstructed defecation syndrome and the presence of a rectocele and/or a rectorectal or rectoanal intussusception, in the absence of sphincter contractile deficiency, were included in the treatment protocol. INTERVENTIONS: All procedures were performed with the use of the Contour Transtar device. We analyzed the functional results of this technique, the incidence and features of the surgical and functional complications, and ways to prevent or treat them. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Constipation was graded by using the Agachan-Wexner constipation score; use of aids to defecate and patient satisfaction were assessed preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also investigated. RESULTS: The constipation intensity was statistically reduced from the preoperative mean value of 15.8 (± 4.9) to 5.2 (± 3.9) at 6 months after surgery (p < 0.0001). Of the 151 (80.3%) patients who took laxatives and the 49 (26.2%) who used enemas before treatment, only 25 (13.2%; p < 0.0001) and 7 (3.7%; p < 0.0001) continued to do so after surgery. None of the 17 (9.1%) patients who had previously helped themselves with digitations needed to continue this practice. Almost all patients showed a good satisfaction rate (3.87/5) after the procedure. LIMITATIONS: Limitations are the short follow-up of 1 year and the design of the study that may introduce potential selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that stapled transanal rectal resection performed with the use of the Contour Transtar is a safe and effective procedure to treat obstructed defecation syndrome.

Long-term follow-up of the Jinling procedure for combined slow-transit constipation and obstructive defecation.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is indicated for chronic constipation refractory to conservative therapy. The treatment of combined slow-transit constipation and obstructive defecation is controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to describe the Jinling procedure and examine safety, effectiveness, and quality of life over 4 years of follow-up. DESIGN: The study is a retrospective review of prospectively gathered data in a patient registry database. SETTINGS: This investigation was conducted at a tertiary-care gastroenterology surgical center in China. PATIENTS: The study included 117 consecutive patients with slow-transit constipation combined with obstructive defecation treated between January 2005 and December 2007. INTERVENTION: The Jinling procedure modifies the classic procedure of subtotal colectomy with colorectal anastomosis by adding a new side-to-side cecorectal anastomosis to solve the coexistence of obstructive defecation and slow-transit constipation in one operation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured morbidity and mortality rates, Wexner constipation scores, and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index at baseline and after 1, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients underwent the Jinling procedure, which was laparoscopically assisted in 56 patients (47.9%) and an open procedure in 61 patients (52.1%). Of the total, 72 patients (61.5%) had undergone previous surgical intervention without improvement. A total of 28 complications and adverse events were reported in 117 procedures, giving an overall morbidity rate of 23.9%; 23 patients (19.7%) had 1 or more events. Most complications were managed conservatively. A significant reduction in Wexner constipation score was observed from baseline (mean, 21.9) to 1 month (mean, 9.8), and the reduction was maintained at 48 months (mean 5.1; p < 0.001). Compared with baseline, significant overall improvements were also seen in gastrointestinal quality of life at 12, 24, and 48 months of follow-up (p < 0.01). LIMITATIONS: This study did not include a comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical practice demonstrates that Jinling procedure is safe and effective for refractory slow-transit constipation associated with obstructive defecation, with minimal major complications, significant improvement of quality of life, and a high satisfaction rate after 4-year follow up.

[Surgical treatment of chronic coprostasis].

Surgical treatment of 27 patients with chronic colostasis and dolichocolon was analyzed. Groups of patients with cologenic and proctogenic colostasis were defined, diagnostic criteria were formulated and optimal surgical tactics were described for each group. Short and long-term results were analyzed and proved to be excellent and satisfactory in majority of patients.

No role for increased rectal compliance in pediatric functional constipation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Increased rectal compliance has been proposed to contribute to pediatric functional constipation (FC). We evaluated the clinical relevance of increased rectal compliance and assessed whether regular use of enemas improves rectal compliance in children with FC. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted on children (8-18 years old) with FC. Pressure-controlled rectal distensions were performed at baseline and at 1 year. Rectal compliance was categorized into 3 groups: normal, moderately increased, or severely increased. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given conventional therapy or rectal enemas and conventional therapy. Clinical success was defined as >or=3 spontaneous defecations per week and fecal incontinence <1 per week. RESULTS: Baseline measurements were performed in 101 children (11.0 +/- 2.1 years); rectal compliance was normal in 36%, moderately increased in 40%, and severely increased in 24%. Patients with severely increased rectal compliance had lower defecation frequency (P = .03), more fecal incontinence (P = .04), and more rectal fecal impaction (P < .001). After 1 year, success values were similar between groups: 42% normal, 41% moderately increased, and 40% with severely increased compliance. Barostat studies performed after 1 year in 80 children (37 conventional therapy and 43 rectal enemas in addition to conventional therapy) revealed that rectal compliance had not changed in either group and had not improved in successfully treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Constipated children with severely increased rectal compliance have severe symptoms. However, increased rectal compliance is not related to treatment failure. Regular use of enemas to avoid rectal fecal impaction does not improve rectal compliance in pediatric FC.

Validity of segmental transit studies used in routine clinical practice, to characterize defaecatory disorder in patients with functional constipation.

OBJECTIVE: Segmental colonic transit can be determined by performing regional counts of radio-opaque markers on an abdominal radiograph. It has been claimed that the pattern of markers can be used to characterize the type of constipation, with a concentration of markers seen in the rectosigmoid region in patients with defaecatory disorders. The aim of our study was to examine this hypothesis in a cohort of patients with functional constipation. METHOD: Consecutive patients presenting to a specialist constipation clinic and satisfying inclusion criteria were studied. All patients had the following assessments: radio-opaque marker study performed according to a standard protocol; proforma-based symptom assessment using Likert scoring; and radioisotope defaecating proctogram. Transit study data included total transit time, rectosigmoid transit time and geometric mean of markers. Symptom scores were recorded for straining, incomplete evacuation and digitation, together with a cumulative symptom score. Evidence of outlet obstruction from the proctogram included four previously described parameters. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients with functional constipation according to the Rome criteria with a median age of 41 years were studied. Neither rectosigmoid transit time nor the geometric centre of markers could differentiate patients with a functional defaecatory disorder (FDD). There was no correlation between the pattern of marker distribution and any of the parameters denoting outlet obstruction. CONCLUSION: Our data do not support the hypothesis that assessment of segmental transit, using standard methods applicable to routine clinical practice can determine the type of constipation. In particular, patients exhibiting evidence of FDD are no more likely to have recto-sigmoid retention of markers than those without.

Giant faecaloma causing perforation of the rectum presented as a subcutaneous emphysema, pneumoperitoneum and pneumomediastinum: a case report.

Constipation with faecal impaction is a common condition, which may lead to serious potential complications. Among such complications, stercoral perforation has been rarely reported in the literature. We report a single case of 75-year-old woman, with a massive faecal impaction, which resulted in a rectum perforation, presented as a pneumoperitoneum, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema. We present this case to remind physicians that neglected accumulation of faecal matter in the rectum may lead to ischemia and perforation of the colon and rectum. This case illustrates that severe chronic constipation requires adequate management, including disimpaction and aggressive medical treatment. Appropriate operative treatment may be life-saving.

Painful defecation and fecal soiling in children.

Fecal soiling is a common complaint among school-age children. The fecal soiling is often accompanied by chronic constipation and so-called "idiopathic," "functional," or "psychogenic" megacolon, the cause of which is undetermined. The records of all children presenting to a pediatric gastroenterology clinic between 1981 and 1990 with difficult defecation were reviewed to determine the incidence of painful defecation and its relationship to chronic impaction and fecal soiling. There were 227 children; 74 were younger than 36 months of age and 153 were older than 36 months. Of the younger children, 86% presented with pain, 71% with impaction, and 97% with severe withholding. The younger children had painful defecation for a mean of 14 +/- 9 (SD) months before presentation. Of the older children, 85% presented with fecal soiling, 57% with pain, and 73% with fecal impaction, and 96% exhibited withholding; the older children had difficult defecation for a mean of 56 +/- 42 months before presentation. Sixty-three percent of the children presenting with fecal soiling had a history of painful defecation beginning before 36 months of age. Painful defecation frequently precedes chronic fecal impaction and fecal soiling in American children. Early, effective treatment of painful defecation in infancy might reduce the incidence of chronic fecal impaction and fecal soiling in school-age children.

Evaluation and treatment of constipation and fecal impaction in adults.

Constipation is a common complaint that physicians encounter. Understanding the patient's definition of constipation and focusing the history and physical examination provide clues to the underlying cause. Initially, an empiric treatment trial is recommended. For patients with warning symptoms or those in whom treatment fails, a limited diagnostic work-up is suggested. Tests of physiologic function are reserved for patients whose condition is refractory to therapy. Fecal impaction can be considered extreme constipation. The pathophysiologic features of fecal impaction are discussed, and recommendations are provided for treatment and prevention.

Effect of bowel cleansing on colonic transit in constipation due to slow transit or evacuation disorder.

Colon transit time measurement with radio-opaque markers is a method of studying the passage of luminal contents throughout the colon. Overall colonic transit time (CTT), as well as segmental transit times [right (RTT), left (LTT) and rectosigmoid (RSTT)], can be calculated. We hypothesize that CTT is influenced by faecal impaction when the rectum is emptied infrequently. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of bowel cleansing on colonic transit time in patients with chronic constipation. In 25 women (age 41 years; range 20-65 years) with constipation according to Thompson criteria, CTT measurement was performed in an unprepared situation and repeated after cleansing with 4 L of Klean-Prepreg. Ten healthy female volunteers (age 41 years; range 27-57 years) were used as controls. In constipated patients, CTT decreased from a median 70 h (range 10-130 h) to 48 h (5-94 h) in the cleansed state (P < 0.001). A shortening of transit time was found in all three segments. In 10 patients with slow transit (ST) (CTT > 86 h), CTT decreased from 110 h (range 94-130) to 86 (38-94) (P < 0.001). Five of the 10 patients with ST before bowel cleansing had a CTT below 86 h after cleansing. In female controls, uncleansed CTT and RSTT shortened from 39 h (23 to 62) and 17 h (8-29) to 29 h (17-48) and 10 h (0-20) after bowel cleansing (P=0.058 and P=0.046). Colonic intraluminal contents have a substantial effect on colonic transit. In female controls, bowel cleansing shortened rectosigmoid transit. Women with constipation had faster transit in the cleansed state, however, the distribution of markers was not altered. Despite the effect of bowel cleansing on CTT, it seems unnecessary to prepare the bowel in clinical practice because the differentiation of patients between slow transit constipation and outlet obstruction is not changed. However, because in an infrequent defecation pattern, the influence of faecal impaction is considerable, CTT should be applied with care for critical clinical decisions in the treatment of constipation.

Prolonged stationary colonic motility recording in seven patients with severe constipation secondary to antidepressants.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the colonic motor profile of seven patients with constipation secondary to antidepressants differed from the motility of seven patients with idiopathic constipation and seven healthy volunteers. All constipated patients had very severe constipation. Colonic manometric recordings were performed for 24 h. The number of high amplitude propagating contractions (HAPC) was lower in the two groups of constipated patients than in controls. No HAPC were observed in 5/7 patients with constipation secondary to antidepressants and in 1/7 patients with idiopathic constipation. The overall area under the curve (AUC) in the left colon was lower in the two constipated patient groups than in controls. AUC increased after a 1000-kcal standard meal given at noon in controls but not in the two groups of constipated patients. In conclusion, in patients with constipation secondary to antidepressants, the overall AUC was as poor as in patients with idiopathic constipation, and no colonic response to eating was observed. Moreover, the number of HAPC was more markedly decreased in patients with constipation secondary to antidepressants than in patients with idiopathic constipation.

Chronic idiopathic constipation with outlet obstruction.

Defecatory difficulties may be a source of great distress to patients. Normal defecation requires the coordination of abdominal and pelvic muscles. Throughout the last decade, many studies have demonstrated various and often mixed abnormalities of these mechanisms. Pathophysiological studies are able to determine, in a specific patient, the most probable causes of the obstructive symptom. Progress in the management of such disorders can only be achieved by understanding their pathophysiology.

Fecal incontinence in elderly patients: common, treatable, yet often undiagnosed.

It is important for primary care physicians to take fecal incontinence seriously and not dismiss it as a normal part of aging. Elderly patients may be reluctant to admit fecal incontinence, so clinicians need to ask about it. Two of the most common causes are fecal impaction (especially in nursing home patients) and rectosphincter dysfunction in people with diabetes.

Review of large intestinal motility and mechanisms of impaction in the horse.

The large intestine has distinct motility patterns which include non-rhythmic haustral kneading of ingesta and stronger rhythmic retropulsive and propulsive contractions which move ingesta along the tract. A variable site electrical pacemaker exists at the pelvic flexure where the strong rhythmic contractions begin. The large intestine can contract adequately with only the intrinsic nerve supply intact. Neurotransmitters have profound effects on large intestinal activity.