Application of pelvic floor rehabilitation in patients with colorectal cancer: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor rehabilitation is common in patients with colorectal cancer, the purpose of this study is to analyze the role of pelvic floor rehabilitation in patients with colorectal cancer and to understand the specific details of pelvic floor rehabilitation intervention in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Six databases were searched for this scoping review and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. RESULTS: A total of 1014 studies were searched, and 12 studies were finally included for analysis. The study found that pelvic floor rehabilitation for colorectal cancer patients can help improve bowel symptoms, quality of life, and psychological status of colorectal cancer patients after surgery, but details of the interventions for pelvic floor rehabilitation for colorectal cancer patients are not standardized. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic floor rehabilitation has shown positive significance in patients with colorectal cancer, but there is a lack of uniform standards in the process of pelvic floor rehabilitation intervention in patients with colorectal cancer.

Research progress in female pelvic floor rehabilitation aids. / å¥³æ€§ç›†åº•åº·å¤è¾ åŠ©å™¨å ·çš„ç ”ç©¶è¿›å±•.

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a common clinical problem that can lead to bladder and bowel dysfunction such as urinary incontinence, urinary retention, fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and sexual dysfunction. Pelvic floor rehabilitation aids are essential tools in the treatment of PFD. However, there is limited understanding of the efficacy and mechanisms of these aids, and there is a lack of standardized guidelines for selecting appropriate aids for different types of PFD. To assist patients in choosing suitable pelvic floor rehabilitation aids to their needs, it is necessary to summarize the existing types, mechanisms, and applications of these aids. Based on their mechanisms and target functions, pelvic floor rehabilitation aids can be mainly categorized into 3 main types. The first type includes aids that improve pelvic floor function, such as vaginal dumbbells, vaginal tampons, and vaginal dilators, which aim to strengthen pelvic floor muscles and enhance the contractility of the urethral, vaginal, and anal sphincters, thereby improving incontinence symptoms. The second type consists of aids that mechanically block the outlet, such as pessaries, urethral plugs, incontinence pads, incontinence pants, anal plugs, and vaginal bowel control systems, which directly or indirectly prevent incontinence leakage. The third type includes aids that assist in outlet drainage, such as catheters and anal excreta collection devices, which help patients effectively expel urine, feces, and other waste materials, preventing incontinence leakage. By summarizing the existing pelvic floor rehabilitation aids, personalized guidance can be provided to patients with PFD, helping them select the appropriate aids for their rehabilitation needs.

Graciloplasty for Anal Incontinence-Is Electrical Stimulation Necessary?

INTRODUCTION: Anal incontinence brings lot of social embarrassment, mental distress, dignity loss, anxiety, low confidence, and eventually a low self-esteem with a restricted social life to the affected person. Surgical repair is the mainstay of treatment for anal incontinence. However, some patients need additional procedures such as gluteoplasty, graciloplasty (adynamic and dynamic), artificial bowel sphincter, and sacral nerve stimulation, which help to reinforce or augment the anal sphincter. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 17 patients who underwent adynamic graciloplasty for reconstruction of anal sphincter from January 2008 to December 2017 was done. Demographic profile, fecal incontinence scores (Wexner score and KAMM score), and anal manometric findings were recorded pregraciloplasty and postgraciloplasty. RESULTS: Of the total 17 patients, 9 were males and 8 were females. Satisfactory continence was achieved in 13 patients out of 17 (76.47%). Continence was defined as satisfactory for patients having a postoperative Wexner score of 2 or less and KAMM score of 4 or less. It was considered to be poor if the Wexner score was greater than 6 and KAMM score was greater than 8 in the follow-up period or if the stoma was not reversed. CONCLUSIONS: Unstimulated or adynamic graciloplasty is a relatively safe procedure, has a short learning curve, is affordable, and avoids the additional implant-related complications. We feel that the unstimulated graciloplasty still has a significant role in the management of anal incontinence.

Pelvic floor rehabilitation for defecation disorders.

Pelvic floor rehabilitation is frequently recommended for defecation disorders, in both constipation and fecal incontinence. However, the lack of patient selection, together with the variety of rehabilitation methods and protocols, often jeopardize the results of this approach, causing difficulty in evaluating outcomes and addressing proper management, and above all, in obtaining scientific evidence for the efficacy of these methods for specific indications. The authors represent different gastroenterological and surgical scientific societies in Italy, and their aim was to identify the indications and agree on treatment protocols for pelvic floor rehabilitation of patients with defecation disorders. This was achieved by means of a modified Delphi method, utilizing a working team (10 members) which developed the statements and a consensus group (15 members, different from the previous ones) which voted twice also suggesting modifications of the statements.

Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation for Bowel Dysfunction After Intersphincteric Resection for Lower Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) for patients with bowel dysfunction after intersphincteric resection (ISR) and to compare the treatment response to that of patients after low anterior resection (LAR). METHODS: Thirty patients with postoperative bowel dysfunction for more than 6 months were enrolled and treated with PFR for 6 months. RESULTS: In the ISR group, significant improvements in the number of bowel movements and the use of antidiarrheal medications were observed, but no significant improvement was observed in the Wexner score (WS) and the fecal incontinence severity index (FISI). Meanwhile, in the LAR group, WS and FISI were better post-treatment than pre-treatment (WS: 10.7-5.7; p = 0.01, FISI: 28-11; p = 0.01). In the assessment of fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL), only the Coping/Behavior category was improved in the ISR group (1.56 before, 2.16 after PFR; p = 0.01), while all four categories were improved significantly in the LAR group. The anorectal manometric examination showed no significant increase in sphincter pressure and the tolerable volume in patients after ISR. CONCLUSIONS: PFR improved several clinical symptoms of patients after ISR. Compared with patients after LAR, patients after ISR showed an insufficient response to PFR in improving fecal incontinence. Considering the result of the generalized assessment of the quality of life scale, PFR may offer a therapeutic effect for several symptoms of patients after ISR.

Ageing with neurogenic bowel dysfunction.

STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal study with postal survey. OBJECTIVES: To describe changes in the patterns of neurogenic bowel dysfunction and bowel management in a population of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) followed for two decades. SETTING: Members of the Danish SCI Association. METHODS: In 1996, a validated questionnaire on bowel function was sent to the members of the Danish SCI Association (n=589). The same questionnaire was sent to all the surviving members in 2006 (n=284) and in 2015 (n=178). A total of 109 responded to both the 1996 and 2015 questionnaires. RESULTS: Comparing data from 2015 with those from the exact same participants in 1996, the proportion of respondents needing more than 30 min for each defaecation increased from 21 to 39% (P<0.01), the use of laxatives increased (P<0.05) and the proportion considering themselves very constipated increased from 19 to 31% (P<0.01). In contrast, the proportion suffering from faecal incontinence remained stable at 18% in 1996 and 19% in 2015. During the 19-year period, there had been no significant change in the methods for bowel care, but 22 (20%) had undergone surgery for bowel dysfunction, including 11 (10%) who had some form of stoma. CONCLUSION: Self-assessed severity of constipation increased but quality of life remained stable in a cohort of people with SCI followed prospectively for 19 years. Methods for bowel care remained surprisingly stable but a large proportion had undergone stoma surgery.

Pelvic floor muscle training for bowel dysfunction following colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review.

AIMS: To identify, evaluate and synthesize the evidence examining the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on bowel dysfunction in patients who have undergone colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Eight electronic databases (MEDLINE 1950-2014; CINAHL 1982-2014; EMBASE 1980-2014; Scopus 1823-2014; PsycINFO 1806-2014; Web of Science 1970-2014; Cochrane Library 2014; PEDro 1999-2014) were systematically searched in March 2014. Reference lists of identified articles were cross referenced and hand searched. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and case series were included if they investigated the effects of conservative treatments, including PFMT on bowel function in patients with colorectal cancer following surgery. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias of studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: Six prospective non-randomized studies and two retrospective studies were included. The mean (SD) NOS risk of bias score was 4.9 (1.2) out of 9; studies were limited by a lack of non-exposed cohort, lack of independent blinded assessment, heterogeneous treatment protocols, and lack of long-term follow-up. The majority of studies reported significant improvements in stool frequency, incontinence episodes, severity of fecal incontinence, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after PFMT. Meta-analysis was not possible due to lack of randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic floor muscle training for patients following surgery for colorectal cancer appears to be associated with improvements in bowel function and HRQoL. Results from non-randomized studies are promising but randomized controlled trials with sufficient power are needed to confirm the effectiveness of PFMT in this population.

Plugs for containing faecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Faecal incontinence is a distressing disorder with high social stigma. Not all people with faecal incontinence can be cured with conservative or surgical treatment and they may need to rely on containment products, such as anal plugs. OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of different types of anal plugs for containment of faecal incontinence. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization (WHO) ICTRP and handsearching of journals and conference proceedings (searched 26 May 2015). Reference lists of identified trials were searched and plug manufacturers were contacted for trials. No language or other limitations were imposed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Types of studies: this review was limited to randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials (including crossovers) of anal plug use for the management of faecal incontinence. TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS: children and adults with faecal incontinence.Types of interventions: any type of anal plug. Comparison interventions might include no treatment, conservative (physical) treatments, nutritional interventions, surgery, pads and other types or sizes of plugs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data from the included trials. Authors of all included trials were contacted for clarification concerning methodological issues. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies with a total of 136 participants were included. Two studies compared the use of plugs versus no plugs, one study compared two sizes of the same brand of plug, and one study compared two brands of plugs. In all included studies there was considerable dropout (in total 48 (35%) dropped out before the end of the study) for varying reasons. Data presented are thus subject to potential bias. 'Pseudo-continence' was, however, achieved by some of those who continued to use plugs, at least in the short-term. In a comparison of two different types of plug, plug loss was less often reported and overall satisfaction was greater during use of polyurethane plugs than polyvinyl-alcohol plugs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available data were limited and incomplete, and not all pre-specified outcomes could be evaluated. Consequently, only tentative conclusions are possible. The available data suggest that anal plugs can be difficult to tolerate. However, if they are tolerated they can be helpful in preventing incontinence. Plugs could then be useful in a selected group of people either as a substitute for other forms of management or as an adjuvant treatment option. Plugs come in different designs and sizes; the review showed that the selection of the type of plug can impact on its performance.

Improvement of fecal incontinence and quality of life by electrical stimulation and biofeedback for patients with low rectal cancer after intersphincteric resection.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and benefits of pelvic rehabilitation programs in terms of functional outcomes and quality of life for patients with fecal incontinence and defecation disorders after rectal cancer surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: University hospital physiotherapy clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=32) who experienced fecal incontinence after sphincter-saving surgery with the intersphincteric resection (ISR) technique and could follow and cooperate with the treatment schedule were included in the present study. INTERVENTIONS: Pelvic rehabilitation programs included electrical stimulation (ES) and biofeedback (BF). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional results, Wexner score, and anorectal manometry were used to assess the clinical outcomes of rehabilitation treatment. RESULTS: Maximum squeeze pressure improved after rehabilitation training (P=.014). There were no statistical differences in resting pressure, resting muscle electromyography, and maximum squeeze electromyography (P=.061, P=.76, and P=.99, respectively). The mean stool frequency was 18.8 per 24 hours before the pelvic intervention program and 7.8 per 24 hours after ES and BF training (P<.001). Of the 32 patients, 27 required antidiarrheal medications before treatment, and after completion of the training, only 9 patients still needed antidiarrheal medications (P<.001). Significant improvements were observed in the Wexner score (17.74 vs 12.93; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that ES and BF are effective in the treatment of fecal incontinence, leading to improvement of quality of life for patients with low rectal cancer after ISR.

Twelve-year follow-up of conservative management of postnatal urinary and faecal incontinence and prolapse outcomes: randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term (12-year) effects of a conservative nurse-led intervention for postnatal urinary incontinence. DESIGN: Follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Community-based intervention in three centres (in the UK and New Zealand). POPULATION: A cohort of 747 women with urinary incontinence at 3 months after childbirth, of whom 471 (63%) were followed up after 12 years. METHODS: Women were randomly allocated to active conservative treatment after delivery (pelvic floor muscle training and bladder training), or to a control group receiving standard care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of urinary incontinence (primary outcome) and faecal incontinence, symptoms and signs of prolapse, and performance of pelvic floor muscle training at 12 years. RESULTS: The significant improvements relative to controls that had been found in urinary incontinence (60 versus 69%; risk difference, RD, -9.1%; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI, -17.3 to -1.0%) and faecal incontinence (4 versus 11%; RD -6.1%; 95% CI -10.8 to -1.6%) at 1 year did not persist for urinary incontinence (83 versus 80%; RD 2.1%; 95% CI -4.9 to 9.1%) or faecal incontinence (19 versus 15%; RD 4.3%; 95% CI -2.5 to 11.0%) at the 12-year follow up, irrespective of incontinence severity at trial entry. The prevalence of prolapse symptoms or objectively measured pelvic organ prolapse also did not differ between the groups. In the short term the intervention motivated more women to perform pelvic floor muscle training (83 versus 55%), but this fell in both groups by 12 years (52 versus 49%). CONCLUSIONS: The moderate short-term benefits of a brief nurse-led conservative treatment for postnatal urinary incontinence did not persist. About four-fifths of women with urinary incontinence 3 months after childbirth still had this problem 12 years later.

Factors associated with toileting disability in older adults without dementia living in residential care facilities.

BACKGROUND: Older adults without dementia living in residential care facilities with toileting disability have increased care costs and dependency. Understanding associated factors could guide prevention and management strategies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of and factors associated with toileting disability in this population. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the 2010 National Survey of Residential Care Facilities. A subsample (n = 2,395) of adults aged 65 years or older, without dementia, and with the potential to implement behavioral interventions was examined. Associated factors were classified according to the disablement process as pathologies, impairments, functional limitations, coexisting disabilities, and intraindividual and extraindividual factors. Logistic regression models accounting for the stratified two-stage probability sampling design were used to identify factors associated with toileting disability. RESULTS: Residents were mostly White women, aged 85 years and older. Prevalence of toileting disability was 15%. Associated factors included reporting fair or poor health; living in a facility with four or less residents; living in a for-profit facility; having bowel incontinence, urinary incontinence, more physical impairments, and visual and hearing impairments; and needing assistance with bathing, dressing, and transferring. DISCUSSION: Multicomponent and multidisciplinary prevention and management efforts should be designed for residents without dementia. Future studies testing the efficacy of prevention efforts are needed and should include treatments for incontinence; physical activity programs targeting impairments with walking, standing, sitting, stooping, reaching, and grasping; and therapy to improve dressing, bathing, and transferring skills.

Continence advice by telehealth for young people.

Children and young people operate in an advanced technological world where new, exciting opportunities exist for remote interactions. To engage with these service users, we set up a nurse-led telehealth facility that enabled young people with spina bifida to access specialist continence service from home. This article describes efforts to embed this innovation into practice and offer insight to some of the challenges we faced in the process. It offers practical guidance on setting up similar services.

[Surgical treatment of patients with severe fecal incontinence].

The objective of the study is improvement of clinical and functional results of surgical treatment of patients with severe fecal incontinence. 79 patients with complete fecal incontinence were included in the study. The technique of surgical intervention was choosed in depending on the localization of structural and functional disorders of the rectum closing apparatus. Complex treatment in pre-operative and post-operative periods was directed on the improvement of functional results. Long-term results (6-24 months) were traced in 63 patients after surgical treatment and complex post-operative rehabilitation. Good and satisfactory results were identified in 57 (90.5%) patients, unsatisfactory results - in 6 (9.5%) patients. Choice of surgical technique in depending on the localization of structural and functional disorders of the rectum closing apparatus and combination of surgical correction with complex functional rehabilitation allow to increase treatment efficiency. Also it improves closing function in the most patients.

Treatment options to improve anorectal function following rectal resection: a systematic review.

AIM: Common problems after rectal resection are loose stools, faecal incontinence, increased frequency and evacuation difficulties, for which there are various therapeutic options. A systematic review was conducted to assess the outcome of treatment options aimed to improve anorectal function after rectal surgery. METHOD: Publications including a therapeutic approach to improve anorectal function after rectal surgery were searched using the following databases: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Pedro, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsychInfo and the Cochrane Library. The focus was on outcome parameters of symptomatic improvement of faecal incontinence, evaluation of defaecation and quality of life. RESULTS: The degree of agreement on eligibility and methodological quality between reviewers calculated with kappa was 0.85. Fifteen studies were included. Treatment options included pelvic floor re-education (n=7), colonic irrigation (n=2) and sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) (n=6). Nine studies reported reduced incontinence scores and a decreased number of incontinent episodes. In 10 studies an improvement in resting and squeeze pressure was observed after treatment with pelvic floor re-education or SNS. Three studies reported improved quality of life after pelvic floor re-education. Significant improvement of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale was found in three studies after SNS. CONCLUSION: Conservative therapies such as pelvic floor re-education and colonic irrigation can improve anorectal function. SNS might be an effective solution in selected patients. However, methodologically qualitative studies are limited and randomized controlled trials are needed to draw evidence-based conclusions.

Rehabilitation of fecal incontinence: what is the influence of anal sphincter lesions?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of rehabilitative treatment of incontinent patients with anal sphincter lesions in order to verify whether these lesions influence the outcome of rehabilitation. METHODS: Between January 2008 and June 2011, 48 patients [36 women, age range 51-77 years; 12 men, age range 57-70 years] affected by fecal incontinence were included in the study. After a preliminary clinical evaluation, including the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) score, all patients were studied by means of endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry. Two patients groups were identified: Group 1 comprised 27 patients with sphincter lesions and Group 2 had 21 patients without sphincter lesions. All 48 underwent a multimodal rehabilitation program. At the end of the rehabilitation program, all patients were reassessed by means of clinical evaluation and anorectal manometry and their data were analyzed. RESULTS: Although we obtained an overall significantly lower FISI score in all patients after rehabilitation (p < 0.001) when compared with pre-treatment values, our study revealed that patients with sphincter lesions had a significantly worse post-rehabilitative FISI score (p < 0.003) when compared with those patients with intact anal sphincters and that there is a linear relationship between post-rehabilitative FISI scores and severity of sphincter lesions (ρ s 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that rehabilitation may be less effective in patients affected by sphincter defects.

[Fecal incontinence--a treatable problem!]. / Stuhlinkontinenz - ein behandelbares Problem!

Faecal incontinence has an enormous negative impact on patients' quality of life. Although the causes for faecal incontinence may vary (idiopatic, neurogenic, due to pregnancy, birth trauma or anorectal surgery), nowadays different therapies are available to cure or support patients after failure of conservative treatment. During the past decade, sacral nerve stimulation has shown to provide major improvement to patients with faecal incontinence. Regardless of the underlying disease (sphincter defect, diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis or idiopathic) the success rate of SNS lies over 80 %. The operation is performed under local anaesthesia and has a low morbidity rate. Not only its good long time results but also its cost effectiveness is based on scientific evidence.

Functional disorders after rectal cancer resection: does a rehabilitation programme improve anal continence and quality of life?

AIM: A poor functional outcome is often reported after total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer, especially when sphincter-saving resection with intersphincteric dissection is performed for low tumours. Anal sphincter rehabilitation is widely proposed for faecal incontinence. Very few studies have reported results to improve anal dysfunction following rectal surgery. This prospective study aimed to assess the benefits of sphincter training after TME in terms of functional outcome and quality of life. METHODS: Anal sphincter training was performed in patients undergoing laparoscopic sphincter-saving TME for rectal cancer. Rehabilitation was performed after ileostomy closure. This group was compared with 24 matched patients. Assessment included one functional and two quality of life questionnaires (SF-36 Health Status and Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life score). RESULTS: From 2007 to 2009, 22 patients underwent laparoscopic TME. The median follow-up after stoma closure was 21.2 (range 8-46) months. The mean stool frequency per day was significantly lower after sphincter training (2.6 in the training group vs 4.0 in the control group, P=0.025). Following rehabilitation, patients complained significantly less about dyschezia (22 vs 63%, P=0.008). Both groups had similar continence (Wexner score 8.3 after training vs 9.9 in controls, NS). Quality of life was significantly improved by sphincter training as measured by the vitality (P=0.004) and mental functioning (P=0.02) subscales on the SF-36 Health Status questionnaire and by the depression and self-perception (P = 0.005) categories of the Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life score. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that anal sphincter training following TME could decrease stool frequency and improve both general and specific quality of life.

Plugs for containing faecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Faecal incontinence is a distressing disorder with high social stigma. Not all people with faecal incontinence can be cured with conservative or surgical treatment and they may need to rely on containment products, such as anal plugs. OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of different types of anal plugs for containment of faecal incontinence. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register (searched 29 February 2012). Reference lists of identified trials were searched and plugs manufacturers were contacted for trials. No language or other limitations were imposed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Types of studies: This review was limited to randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials (including crossovers) of anal plug use for the management of faecal incontinence. TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS: Children and adults with faecal incontinence.Types of interventions: Any type of anal plug. Comparison interventions might include no treatment, conservative (physical) treatments, nutritional interventions, surgery, pads and other types or sizes of plugs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data from the included trials. Authors of all included trials were contacted for clarification concerning methodological issues. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies with a total of 136 participants were included. Two studies compared the use of plugs versus no plugs, one study compared two sizes of the same brand of plug, and one study compared two brands of plugs. In all included studies there was considerable dropout (in total 48 (35%) dropped out before the end of the study) for varying reasons. Data presented are thus subject to potential bias. 'Pseudo-continence' was, however, achieved by some of those who continued to use plugs, at least in the short-term. In a comparison of two different types of plug, plug loss was less often reported and overall satisfaction was greater during use of polyurethane plugs than polyvinyl-alcohol plugs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available data were limited and incomplete, and not all pre-specified outcomes could be evaluated. Consequently, only tentative conclusions are possible. The available data suggest that anal plugs can be difficult to tolerate. However, if they are tolerated they can be helpful in preventing incontinence. Plugs could then be useful in a selected group of people either as a substitute for other forms of management or as an adjuvant treatment option. Plugs come in different designs and sizes; the review showed that the selection of the type of plug can impact on its performance.

Does physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor muscle training increase the quality of life in patients after radical prostatectomy? A randomized clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to study the effect of postoperative physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) parameters in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway. Eighty-five men were randomized into two intervention groups (A and B). patients in group A (n = 42) were offered physiotherapist-guided PFMT (in groups or by DVD) once weekly throughout the first 12 months after RP, while those in group B (n = 43) trained on their own. HRQoL data were assessed using the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) and the Short Form-12 (SF-12) health survey. The physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores of the SF-12 plus the urinary, sexual and bowel function and bother of the UCLA-PCI make up the eight quality of life outcomes used in this study. Data were obtained preoperatively (baseline), 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Eighty patients completed at least one follow-up assessment, 38 in group A and 42 in group B, giving a dropout rate of 5.9%. The overall response rates were 96% at baseline, 83% at 6 weeks, 90% at 3 months, 88% at 6 months and 68% at 12 months. No statistically significant difference in HRQoL was found between groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: Even though physiotherapist-guided training of the pelvic floor muscles after RP improved postoperative urinary incontinence significantly compared to those patients receiving standard care/training, this was not reflected in better outcome in HRQoL parameters.

A new grading for easy and concise description of functional status after spinal cord lesions.

BACKGROUND: Disability scales do not enable the transmission of concise, meaningful and daily function description for clinical purposes. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional statistical analysis of 328 patients' Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III item scores (SIS). OBJECTIVE: To develop a concise and clinically interpretable data-based characterization of daily task accomplishment for patients with spinal cord lesions (SCLs). SETTING: Multi-center study at 13 spinal units in 6 countries. METHODS: Patients were grouped into clusters characterized by smaller differences between the patients' SIS within the clusters than between their centers, using the k-medoides algorithm. The number of clusters (k) was chosen according to the percent of SIS variation they explained and the clinical distinction between them. RESULTS: Analysis showed that k=8 SIS clusters offer a good description of the patient population. The eight functional clusters were designated as A-H, each cluster (grade) representing a combination of task accomplishments. Higher grades were usually (but not always) associated with patients implementing more difficult tasks. Throughout rehabilitation, the patients' functional grade improved and the distribution of patients with similar functional grades within the total SCIM III score deciles remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: A new classification based on SIS clusters enables a concise description of overall functioning and task accomplishment distribution in patients with SCL. A software tool is used to identify the patients' functional grade. Findings support the stability and utility of the grades for characterizing the patients' functional status.