RESUMEN
Burn injuries including those caused by chemicals can result in systemic effects and acute lung injury (ALI). Cutaneous exposure to Lewisite, a warfare and chemical burn agent, also causes ALI. To overcome the limitations in conducting direct research on Lewisite-induced ALI in a laboratory setting, an animal model was developed using phenylarsine oxide (PAO) as a surrogate for Lewisite. Due to lack of a reliable animal model mimicking the effects of such exposures, development of effective therapies to treat such injuries is challenging. We demonstrated that a single cutaneous exposure to PAO resulted in disruption of the alveolar-capillary barrier as evidenced by elevated protein levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). BALF supernatant of PAO-exposed animals had increased levels of high mobility group box 1, a damage associated molecular pattern molecule. Arterial blood-gas measurements showed decreased pH, increased PaCO2, and decreased partial pressure of arterial O2, indicative of respiratory acidosis, hypercapnia, and hypoxemia. Increased protein levels of interleukin (IL)-6, CXCL-1, CXCL-2, CXCL-5, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, CXCL-10, leukemia inhibitory factor, leptin, IL-18, CCL-2, CCL-3, and CCL-7 were observed in the lung of PAO-exposed mice. Further, vascular endothelial growth factor levels were reduced in the lung. Pulmonary function evaluated using a flexiVent showed a downward shift in the pressure-volume loop, decreases in static compliance and inspiratory capacity, increases in respiratory elastance and tissue elastance. These changes are consistent with an ALI phenotype. These results demonstrate that cutaneous PAO exposure leads to ALI and that the model can be used as an effective surrogate to investigate vesicant-induced ALI. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study presents a robust model for studying ALI resulting from cutaneous exposure to PAO, a surrogate for the toxic vesicating agent Lewisite. The findings in this study mimic the effects of cutaneous Lewisite exposure, providing a reliable model for investigating mechanisms underlying toxicity. The model can also be used to develop medical countermeasures to mitigate ALI associated with cutaneous Lewisite exposure.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Pulmonar Aguda , Arsenicales , Irritantes , Ratones , Animales , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , Pulmón/metabolismo , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/inducido químicamente , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/metabolismo , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/química , Interleucina-6/metabolismoRESUMEN
Nitrogen mustard (NM) is a cytotoxic vesicant known to cause pulmonary injury that can progress to fibrosis. NM toxicity is associated with an influx of inflammatory macrophages in the lung. Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a nuclear receptor involved in bile acid and lipid homeostasis that has anti-inflammatory activity. In these studies, we analyzed the effects of FXR activation on lung injury, oxidative stress, and fibrosis induced by NM. Male Wistar rats were exposed to phosphate-buffered saline (vehicle control) or NM (0.125 mg/kg) by intratracheal Penncentury-MicroSprayer aerosolization; this was followed by treatment with the FXR synthetic agonist, obeticholic acid (OCA, 15 mg/kg), or vehicle control (0.13-0.18 g peanut butter) 2 hours later and then once per day, 5 days per week thereafter for 28 days. NM caused histopathological changes in the lung, including epithelial thickening, alveolar circularization, and pulmonary edema. Picrosirius red staining and lung hydroxyproline content were increased, indicative of fibrosis; foamy lipid-laden macrophages were also identified in the lung. This was associated with aberrations in pulmonary function, including increases in resistance and hysteresis. Following NM exposure, lung expression of HO-1 and iNOS, and the ratio of nitrates/nitrites in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL), markers of oxidative stress increased, along with BAL levels of inflammatory proteins, fibrinogen, and sRAGE. Administration of OCA attenuated NM-induced histopathology, oxidative stress, inflammation, and altered lung function. These findings demonstrate that FXR plays a role in limiting NM-induced lung injury and chronic disease, suggesting that activating FXR may represent an effective approach to limiting NM-induced toxicity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In this study, the role of farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) in mustard vesicant-induced pulmonary toxicity was analyzed using nitrogen mustard (NM) as a model. This study's findings that administration of obeticholic acid, an FXR agonist, to rats reduces NM-induced pulmonary injury, oxidative stress, and fibrosis provide novel mechanistic insights into vesicant toxicity, which may be useful in the development of efficacious therapeutics.
Asunto(s)
Ácido Quenodesoxicólico/análogos & derivados , Lesión Pulmonar , Mecloretamina , Ratas , Masculino , Animales , Mecloretamina/toxicidad , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Ratas Wistar , Pulmón , Fibrosis , Inflamación/inducido químicamente , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/patología , Lesión Pulmonar/metabolismo , Estrés Oxidativo , LípidosRESUMEN
Sulfur mustard (SM), a vesicating agent first used during World War I, remains a potent threat as a chemical weapon to cause intentional/accidental chemical emergencies. Eyes are extremely susceptible to SM toxicity. Nitrogen mustard (NM), a bifunctional alkylating agent and potent analog of SM, is used in laboratories to study mustard vesicant-induced ocular toxicity. Previously, we showed that SM-/NM-induced injuries (in vivo and ex vivo rabbit corneas) are reversed upon treatment with dexamethasone (DEX), a US Food and Drug Administration-approved, steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Here, we optimized NM injuries in ex vivo human corneas and assessed DEX efficacy. For injury optimization, one cornea (randomly selected from paired eyes) was exposed to NM: 100 nmoles for 2 hours or 4 hours, and 200 nmoles for 2 hours, and the other cornea served as a control. Injuries were assessed 24 hours post NM-exposure. NM 100 nmoles exposure for 2 hours was found to cause optimal corneal injury (epithelial thinning [â¼69%]; epithelial-stromal separation [6-fold increase]). In protein arrays studies, 24 proteins displayed ≥40% change in their expression in NM exposed corneas compared with controls. DEX administration initiated 2 hours post NM exposure and every 8 hours thereafter until 24 hours post-exposure reversed NM-induced corneal epithelial-stromal separation [2-fold decrease]). Of the 24 proteins dysregulated upon NM exposure, six proteins (delta-like canonical Notch ligand 1, FGFbasic, CD54, CCL7, endostatin, receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-4) associated with angiogenesis, immune/inflammatory responses, and cell differentiation/proliferation, showed significant reversal upon DEX treatment (Student's t test; P ≤ 0.05). Complementing our animal model studies, DEX was shown to mitigate vesicant-induced toxicities in ex vivo human corneas. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Nitrogen mustard (NM) exposure-induced injuries were optimized in an ex vivo human cornea culture model and studies were carried out at 24 h post 100 nmoles NM exposure. Dexamethasone (DEX) administration (started 2 h post NM exposure and every 8 h thereafter) reversed NM-induced corneal injuries. Molecular mediators of DEX action were associated with angiogenesis, immune/inflammatory responses, and cell differentiation/proliferation, indicating DEX aids wound healing via reversing vesicant-induced neovascularization (delta-like canonical Notch ligand 1 and FGF basic) and leukocyte infiltration (CD54 and CCL7).
Asunto(s)
Sustancias para la Guerra Química , Lesiones de la Cornea , Gas Mostaza , Animales , Humanos , Conejos , Mecloretamina/toxicidad , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Sustancias para la Guerra Química/toxicidad , Ligandos , Córnea , Lesiones de la Cornea/inducido químicamente , Lesiones de la Cornea/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesiones de la Cornea/metabolismo , Gas Mostaza/toxicidad , Dexametasona/farmacología , Dexametasona/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The impact of chronic occupational exposures to irritants on asthma remains discussed. We studied the associations between occupational exposures and asthma, with specific interest for chronic exposure to irritants, including disinfectants and cleaning products (DCPs) and solvents. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses included 115 540 adults (55% women, mean age 43 years, 10% current asthma) working at inclusion in the French population-based CONSTANCES cohort (2012-2020). Current asthma was defined by ever asthma with symptoms, medication or asthma attacks (past 12 months), and the asthma symptom score by the sum of 5 respiratory symptoms (past 12 months). Both lifetime and current occupational exposures were assessed by the Occupational Asthma-specific Job-Exposure Matrix. Associations were evaluated by gender using logistic and binomial negative regressions adjusted for age, smoking status and body mass index. RESULTS: In women, associations were observed between current asthma and lifetime exposure to irritants (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11), DCPs (1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12) and solvents (1.06, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.14). In men, only lifetime exposure to DCPs (1.10, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.20) was associated with current asthma. Lifetime exposure to irritants was associated with higher asthma symptom score both in women (mean score ratio: 1.08, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.11) and men (1.11, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.15), especially for DCPs (women: 1.09, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.13, men: 1.21, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.27) and solvents (women 1.14, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.19, men: 1.10, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.15). For current exposures, no consistent associations were observed with current asthma and asthma symptom score. CONCLUSIONS: Lifetime occupational exposures to irritants were associated with current asthma and higher asthma symptom score. These exposures should be carefully considered in asthma management.
Asunto(s)
Asma Ocupacional , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedades Profesionales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Asma Ocupacional/inducido químicamente , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiología , Solventes/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The vesicant sulfur mustard (SM) is a chemical warfare agent that causes acute and chronic injury to the cornea and proximal anterior segment structures. Despite clinical evidence of SM-exposure causing unexplained retinal deficits, there have been no animal studies conducted to examine the retinal toxicity of this vesciant. The cardinal hallmark of retinal response to stressors or injury is the activation of reactive gliosis, a cellular process largely governed by Müller glia. Previously we showed that corneal exposure to sodium hydroxide elicits rapid induction of reactive gliosis and results in retinal degeneration in a dose-related manner. Based on this evidence, we hypothesized that the vesicant nitrogen mustard (NM), an analog of SM, may also elicit reactive gliosis. To test this idea, we developed a mouse model of NM ocular injury and investigated corneal and retinal effects focusing on citrullination, a posttranslational modification (PTM) of proteins. This PTM was recently linked to alkali injury and has also been shown to occur in retinal degenerative conditions. Here, we demonstrate that corneal exposure to 1% NM causes a synchronous activation of citrullination in both the cornea and retina with hypercitrullination becoming apparent temporally and manifesting with altered cellular expression characteristics. A key finding is that ocular citrullination occurs acutely as early as 1-h post-injury in both the cornea and retina, which underscores a need for expeditious interception of this acute corneal and retinal response. Moreover, exploiting dose response and temporal studies, we uncoupled NM-induced retinal citrullination from its induction of retinal gliosis. Our findings demonstrate that hypercitrullination is a common corneo-retinal mechanism that sensitizes the eye to NM injury and suggests that counteracting hypercitrullination may provide a suitable countermeasure to vesicant injury.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Oculares , Gas Mostaza , Enfermedades de la Retina , Animales , Ratones , Mecloretamina/toxicidad , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Irritantes/metabolismo , Gliosis/inducido químicamente , Gliosis/metabolismo , Córnea/metabolismo , Lesiones Oculares/inducido químicamente , Lesiones Oculares/metabolismo , Retina , Gas Mostaza/toxicidad , Enfermedades de la Retina/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de la Retina/metabolismoRESUMEN
Lewisite (LEW) is an arsenical vesicant that can be a potentially dangerous chemical warfare agent (CWA). Eyes are particularly susceptible to vesicant induced injuries and ocular LEW exposure can act swiftly, causing burning of eyes, edema, inflammation, cell death and even blindness. In our previous studies, we developed a LEW exposure-induced corneal injury model in rabbit and showed increased inflammation, neovascularization, cell death, and structural damage to rabbit corneas upon LEW exposure. In the present study, we further assessed the metabolomic changes to delineate the possible mechanisms underlying the LEW-induced corneal injuries. This information is vital and could help in the development of effective targeted therapies against ocular LEW injuries. Thus, the metabolomic changes associated with LEW exposures in rabbit corneas were assessed as a function of time, to delineate pathways from molecular perturbations at the genomic and proteomic levels. New Zealand white rabbit corneas (n = 3-6) were exposed to LEW vapor (0.2 mg/L; flow rate: 300 ml/min) for 2.5 min (short exposure; low dose) or 7.5 min (long-exposure; high dose) and then collected at 1, 3, 7, or 14 days post LEW exposure. Samples were prepared using the automated MicroLab STAR® system, and proteins precipitated to recover the chemically diverse metabolites. Metabolomic analysis was carried out by reverse phase UPLC-MS/MS and gas chromatography (GC)-MS. The data obtained were analyzed using Metabolon's software. The results showed that LEW exposures at high doses were more toxic, particularly at the day 7 post exposure time point. LEW exposure was shown to dysregulate metabolites associated with all the integral functions of the cornea and cause increased inflammation and immune response, as well as generate oxidative stress. Additionally, all important metabolic functions of the cells were also affected: lipid and nucleotide metabolism, and energetics. The high dose LEW exposures were more toxic, particularly at day 7 post LEW exposure (>10-fold increased levels of histamine, quinolinate, N-acetyl-ß-alanine, GMP, and UPM). LEW exposure dysregulated integral functions of the cornea, caused inflammation and heightened immune response, and generated oxidative stress. Lipid and nucleotide metabolism, and energetics were also affected. The novel information about altered metabolic profile of rabbit cornea following LEW exposure could assist in delineating complex molecular events; thus, aid in identifying therapeutic targets to effectively ameliorate ocular trauma.
Asunto(s)
Arsenicales , Lesiones de la Cornea , Animales , Conejos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Irritantes/metabolismo , Cromatografía Liquida , Proteómica , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Córnea/metabolismo , Lesiones de la Cornea/inducido químicamente , Lesiones de la Cornea/metabolismo , Arsenicales/efectos adversos , Arsenicales/metabolismo , Inflamación/metabolismo , Nucleótidos/efectos adversos , Nucleótidos/metabolismo , LípidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the associations between the evolution of household use of cleaning products with the asthma symptom score and its evolution over 8 years. METHODS: Our study is based on 509 women participating in the last two surveys of the Epidemiological study on the Genetics and Environment of Asthma (EGEA) study (EGEA2: 2003-2007 (44 years, 19% current smokers) and EGEA3: 2011-2013). We assessed an asthma symptom score and the use of household cleaning products through standardised questionnaires. We studied longitudinal associations of the evolution of weekly use of irritant or spayed cleaning products with (1) the asthma symptom score at EGEA3 and a stable symptom score between EGEA2-EGEA3 (negative binomial models) and (2) the incidence/evolution of asthma symptoms between EGEA2-EGEA3 (logistic/polytomous logistic regressions). Models accounted for familial dependence and were adjusted for age, smoking status, body mass index and occupational exposure to asthmagens. RESULTS: Persistent and increased (40% and 16%, respectively) weekly use of irritants or sprays were associated with a higher risk of asthma symptoms at EGEA3 (Mean Score Ratio (MSR)=1.51 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.14) and 1.33 (95% CI 0.85 to 2.08), respectively). A decreased use (19%) was associated with a lower risk of symptoms at EGEA3, compared with a persistent use (MSR=0.59 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.88)). We also observed an association between an increased use of sprays and the incidence of asthma symptoms (OR=2.30 (95% CI 1.08 to 4.91)), compared with no weekly use of irritants/sprays. CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal study, with repeated assessment of exposure and respiratory health, supports the hypothesis that a persistent or increased weekly use of sprayed cleaning products over time may have an adverse effect on the evolution of asthma symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Longitudinales , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Asma/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , FumarRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute irritant asthma is a preventable health consequence of a workplace exposure and has a number of adverse outcomes. While cases and case series are reported, little is known about the causes and incidence of this condition over prolonged periods of time. AIMS: We aimed to estimate the reported incidence of irritant asthma referred to a national reporting scheme, and how this has changed over time. METHODS: Cases of irritant asthma reported to SWORD, the UK-based Surveillance of Work-related Occupational Respiratory Diseases scheme, were grouped into four 5-year time periods from 1999 onwards. Likely causative exposures, job, work sector and incidence rates were analysed over time. RESULTS: 307 actual cases equated to 1066 estimated cases; actual cases had a mean age of 46 years (SD 17.8); 70.7% were male. The annual incidence fell from 1.98 per million employed in the first 5-year period, to 0.56 in the most recent. Eleven occupational codes were associated with six or more attributed cases, and between them accounted for 38% of all cases. Thirteen exposure categories were associated with five or more cases. These were formaldehyde (n=5), cutting oils and coolants (n=6), isocyanates (n=6), pesticides and herbicides (n=6), welding fumes (n=7), paints (n=7), solder and colophony (n=7), solvents (n=9), fuel oil, diesel and ill-defined fumes (n=10), chlorine and hypochlorites (n=15), acids (n=23), smoke (n=25) and cleaning products and sterilising agents (n=39). CONCLUSIONS: While the incidence of irritant asthma may have fallen, cases are persistently attributed to well-described causes. A persistence of cases attributed to cleaning agents was seen.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/etiología , Incidencia , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To prevent irritant contact eczema even in occupational fields with heavy-duty soiling, it is generally recommended to use 'mild' hand cleansers (mild detergent without grits, MC). On the other hand, since grit-containing cleansers (GC) show a higher washing power that minimizes washing time, their usage is generally preferred in specific occupational fields. OBJECTIVES: To compare whether a shorter, intense washing period might cause less skin damage than a longer washing period with an MC. METHODS: Differences in cleaning time were first verified in a pilot study using standardized model dirt. In the main study, the forearms of 35 healthy volunteers were washed with three standardized procedures over a period of 3 days, either using 2 min of MC with/without hand brush or 1-min GC. Clinical scoring, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), corneometry, colourimetry and scaliness/roughness (Visioscan) were used to evaluate the epidermal barrier, topography and irritation. RESULTS: The pre-study showed that washing time doubled when using MC vs. GC. Using GC resulted in stronger barrier disruption, even after a shorter washing period - median ΔT4-T1 TEWL 0.96 g/m2 /h vs. 4.91 g/m2 /h respectively, p < 0.0001. The most harmful procedure for the skin was the additional application of a hand brush (18.86 g/m2 /h). CONCLUSIONS: Short-time washing with GC damages the skin barrier more significantly in comparison to a longer application of an MC. When washing with MC, the strongest irritant reaction occurred when accompanied with hand brushing.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Irritante , Humanos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Proyectos Piloto , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/complicaciones , Piel , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/prevención & control , Agua , Pérdida Insensible de AguaRESUMEN
Sulfur mustard (SM) is a notorious, bifunctional alkylating vesicant that was first used in warfare during World War I in 1917 and since then has been deployed in numerous skirmishes with its most recent documented use being during the Middle Eastern conflicts. Apart from its use in combat and terrorist activities, continual threat of accidental exposure from old stockpiles and improperly discarded munitions is ever present, especially to the innocent and unassuming civilian populations. SM can cause devastating injuries, depending on the dosage of SM exposure, route of exposure, as well as the physiological conditions of the individuals exposed. The most common routes of exposure are ocular, dermal, and exposure to the lungs and respiratory tissues through inhalation. Eyes are the most susceptible organ to SM-induced toxicities owing to their high moisture content and rapidly dividing cells. Additionally, ocular injury causes the most expeditious disablement of individuals even upon whole-body exposures. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the mechanisms underlying SM-induced ocular toxicity and design therapeutic interventions to prevent/mitigate ocular injuries. Ocular SM exposure may cause a wide range of symptoms such as inflammation, lacrimation, itching, dryness, photophobia, edema of the cornea/sclera/retina/iris, conjunctivitis, degradation of the corneal layer, fusion of two or more ocular layers, neovascularization, fibrosis, and temporary or permanent structural damage to one or more ocular layers. These symptoms may lead to vision impairments, resulting in partial or complete blindness that may be permanent. The highly toxic and exceedingly notorious nature of SM makes it a highly regulated chemical, requiring very expensive licensing, security, and safety requirements; thus, the more easily accessible analogue, nitrogen mustard (NM) that mimics SM-induced toxicity and injuries is employed in plethora of studies conducted in different animal models and culture systems. This review provides a comprehensive account of the injuries and symptoms that occur upon ocular SM exposures in human patients as well as studies in animal (in vivo, ex vivo) and cell (in vitro) models of SM and NM ocular exposures. Special emphasis has been laid on highlighting the strengths and lacunae in the research as well as the possible unexplored avenues of mechanisms underlying mustard-induced ocular injury that can be explored in future research endeavors. Furthermore, development of therapeutic interventions and targets of interest in the ocular system exposed to SM and NM, based on studies in human patients as well as in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro models has been discussed in great depth, providing a valuable knowledge database to delineate pathways associated with vesicant-induced toxicity, and strategies/diagnostic tools against SM-induced toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Sustancias para la Guerra Química , Lesiones Oculares , Gas Mostaza , Animales , Sustancias para la Guerra Química/toxicidad , Córnea/metabolismo , Lesiones Oculares/inducido químicamente , Lesiones Oculares/metabolismo , Humanos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Irritantes/metabolismo , Mecloretamina/toxicidad , Gas Mostaza/toxicidadRESUMEN
AIM: The biological mechanisms of work-related asthma induced by irritants remain unclear. We investigated the associations between occupational exposure to irritants and respiratory endotypes previously identified among never asthmatics (NA) and current asthmatics (CA) integrating clinical characteristics and biomarkers related to oxidative stress and inflammation. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from 999 adults (mean 45 years old, 46% men) from the case-control and familial Epidemiological study on the Genetics and Environments of Asthma (EGEA) study. Five respiratory endotypes have been identified using a cluster-based approach: NA1 (n=463) asymptomatic, NA2 (n=169) with respiratory symptoms, CA1 (n=50) with active treated adult-onset asthma, poor lung function, high blood neutrophil counts and high fluorescent oxidation products level, CA2 (n=203) with mild middle-age asthma, rhinitis and low immunoglobulin E level, and CA3 (n=114) with inactive/mild untreated allergic childhood-onset asthma. Occupational exposure to irritants during the current or last held job was assessed by the updated occupational asthma-specific job-exposure matrix (levels of exposure: no/medium/high). Associations between irritants and each respiratory endotype (NA1 asymptomatic as reference) were studied using logistic regressions adjusted for age, sex and smoking status. RESULTS: Prevalence of high occupational exposure to irritants was 7% in NA1, 6% in NA2, 16% in CA1, 7% in CA2 and 10% in CA3. High exposure to irritants was associated with CA1 (adjusted OR aOR, (95% CI) 2.7 (1.0 to 7.3)). Exposure to irritants was not significantly associated with other endotypes (aOR range: 0.8 to 1.5). CONCLUSION: Occupational exposure to irritants was associated with a distinct respiratory endotype suggesting oxidative stress and neutrophilic inflammation as potential associated biological mechanisms.
Asunto(s)
Asma Ocupacional , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Adulto , Asma Ocupacional/inducido químicamente , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiología , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a major cause of occupational disease. The aim was to review the relation between exposure to occupational irritants and ICD and the prognosis of ICD. METHODS: Through a systematic search, 1516 titles were identified, and 48 studies were included in the systematic review. RESULTS: We found that the evidence for an association between ICD and occupational irritants was strong for wet work, moderate for detergents and non-alcoholic disinfectants, and strong for a combination. The highest quality studies provided limited evidence for an association with use of occlusive gloves without other exposures and moderate evidence with simultaneous exposure to other wet work irritants. The evidence for an association between minor ICD and exposure to metalworking fluids was moderate. Regarding mechanical exposures, the literature was scarce and the evidence limited. We found that the prognosis for complete healing of ICD is poor, but improves after decrease of exposure through change of occupation or work tasks. There was no substantial evidence for an influence of gender, age, or household exposures. Inclusion of atopic dermatitis in the analysis did not alter the risk of ICD. Studies were at risk of bias, mainly due to selection and misclassification of exposure and outcome. This may have attenuated the results. CONCLUSION: This review reports strong evidence for an association between ICD and a combination of exposure to wet work and non-alcoholic disinfectants, moderate for metalworking fluids, limited for mechanical and glove exposure, and a strong evidence for a poor prognosis of ICD.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Atópica , Dermatitis Irritante , Dermatitis Profesional , Exposición Profesional , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/complicaciones , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Humanos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , PielRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of contact allergy (CA) to Amerchol L-101 (AL-101), a marker for lanolin allergy, is problematic. Positive patch test reactions are frequently doubtful or weakly positive and difficult to associate with clinical relevance. OBJECTIVE: To gain further insight on the allergic or irritant nature of skin reactions induced by AL-101 patch test. METHODS: We re-tested in a dose-response fashion, 10 subjects with AL-101 CA and performed comprehensive transcriptomic analysis (gene arrays, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction [qRT-PCR]) of samples of their skin reactions. RESULTS: Eight of the 10 CA subjects reacted positively upon re-test, whereas two did not react. Most of AL-101 positive patch tests expressed an allergy signature with strong activation of gene modules associated with adaptive immunity and downregulation of cornification pathway genes. In addition, the breadth of gene modulation correlated with the magnitude of patch test reactions and the concentration of AL-101 applied. However, we observed that some of the positive patch test reactions to AL-101 expressed no/few allergy biomarkers, suggesting the induction of an irritant skin inflammation in these samples. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that AL-101 is an allergen that can cause both contact allergy and contact irritation. Our results also highlight that molecular profiling might help to strengthen clinical diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/genética , Humanos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Lanolina , Pruebas del Parche/métodosRESUMEN
Chemotherapy causes intestinal mucositis, which includes villous atrophy and altered mucosal barrier function. However, there is an uncertainty regarding how the reduced small-intestinal surface area affects the mucosal permeability of the small marker probe mannitol (MW 188), and how the mucosa responds to luminal irritants after chemotherapy. The aims in this study were to determine (i) the relationship between chemotherapy-induced villus atrophy and the intestinal permeability of mannitol and (ii) how the mucosa regulate this permeability in response to luminal ethanol and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). This was investigated by treating rats with a single intraperitoneal dose of doxorubicin, irinotecan, or 5-fluorouracil. After 72 h, jejunum was single-pass perfused and mannitol permeability determined at baseline and after 15 min luminal exposure to 15% ethanol or 5 mg/mL SDS. Tissue samples for morphological analyses were sampled from the perfused segment. All three chemotherapeutics caused a similar 30% reduction in villus length. Mannitol permeability increased with irinotecan (1.3-fold) and 5-fluorouracil (2.5-fold) and was reduced with doxorubicin (0.5-fold), suggesting that it is not epithelial surface area alone that regulates intestinal permeability to mannitol. There was no additional increase in mannitol permeability induced by luminal ethanol or SDS in the chemotherapy-treated rats compared to controls, which may be related to the relatively high basal permeability of mannitol compared to other common low-permeability probes. We therefore suggest that future studies should focus on elucidating the complex interplay between chemotherapy in combination with luminal irritants on the intestinal permeability of other probes.
Asunto(s)
Doxiciclina/efectos adversos , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Mucosa Intestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Irinotecán/efectos adversos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Manitol/metabolismo , Mucositis/patología , Animales , Etanol/efectos adversos , Inyecciones Intraperitoneales , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Masculino , Mucositis/inducido químicamente , Mucositis/metabolismo , Tamaño de los Órganos/efectos de los fármacos , Permeabilidad , Ratas , Dodecil Sulfato de Sodio/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory cutaneous disease that is often associated with other atopic symptoms, such as food allergy, allergic rhinitis and asthma, leading to significant morbidity and healthcare costs. The pathogenesis of AD is complicated and multifactorial. Although the aetiology of AD remains incompletely understood, recent studies have provided further insight into AD pathophysiology, demonstrating that the interaction among genetic predisposition, immune dysfunction and environmental provocation factors contributes to its development. However, the increasing prevalence of AD suggests that environmental factors such as irritation and cutaneous infection play a crucial role in triggering and/or aggravating the disease. Of note, AD skin is susceptible to bacterial, fungal and viral infections, and microorganisms may colonize the skin and aggravate AD symptoms. Overall, understanding the mechanisms by which these risk factors affect the cutaneous immunity of patients with AD is of great importance for developing a precision medicine approach for treatment. This review summarizes recent developments in exogenous factors involved in the pathogenesis of AD, with special emphasis on irritants and microbial infections.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica/fisiopatología , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cutáneas Infecciosas/microbiología , Piel/microbiología , Dermatitis Atópica/inmunología , Dermatitis Atópica/microbiología , Humanos , Erupción Variceliforme de Kaposi/inmunología , Erupción Variceliforme de Kaposi/fisiopatología , Microbiota , Molusco Contagioso/inmunología , Molusco Contagioso/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Cutáneas Infecciosas/inmunología , Enfermedades Cutáneas Infecciosas/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Skin exposure to chemicals may induce an inflammatory disease known as contact dermatitis (CD). Distinguishing the allergic and irritant forms of CD often proves challenging in the clinic. METHODS: To characterize the molecular signatures of chemical-induced skin inflammation, we conducted a comprehensive transcriptomic analysis on the skin lesions of 47 patients with positive patch tests to reference contact allergens and nonallergenic irritants. RESULTS: A clear segregation was observed between allergen- and irritant-induced gene profiles. Distinct modules pertaining to the epidermal compartment, metabolism, and proliferation were induced by both contact allergens and irritants; whereas only contact allergens prompted strong activation of adaptive immunity, notably of cytotoxic T-cell responses. Our results also confirmed that: (a) unique pathways characterize allergen- and irritant-induced dermatitis; (b) the intensity of the clinical reaction correlates with the magnitude of immune activation. Finally, using a machine-learning approach, we identified and validated several minimal combinations of biomarkers to distinguish contact allergy from irritation. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the value of molecular profiling of chemical-induced skin inflammation for improving the diagnosis of allergic versus irritant contact dermatitis.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Irritante , Alérgenos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/genética , Humanos , Inflamación , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Pruebas del ParcheRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Scalp conditions are often multifactorial. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with scalp involvement and patch-testing outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data (1996-2016). Study groups included patients with scalp involvement (≤3 anatomic sites coded) with or without additional sites. RESULTS: A total of 4.8% of patients (2331/48,753) had scalp identified as 1 of up to 3 affected anatomic sites. Approximately one-third of "scalp-only" individuals had a specific primary diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis (38.6%), followed by seborrheic dermatitis (17.2%) and irritant contact dermatitis (9.3%). When adjacent anatomic sites were affected, allergic contact dermatitis was more frequently identified as the primary diagnosis (>50%). The top 5 currently clinically relevant allergens in scalp-only patients were p-phenylenediamine, fragrance mix I, nickel sulfate, balsam of Peru, and cinnamic aldehyde. Methylisothiazolinone sensitivity was notable when adjacent anatomic sites were involved. The top 3 specifically identified sources for scalp-only allergens were hair dyes, shampoo/conditioners, and consumer items (eg, hair appliances, glasses). LIMITATIONS: Tertiary referral population. CONCLUSION: Isolated scalp involvement was less likely to be associated with allergic contact dermatitis than when adjacent anatomic sites were involved. Overlap with multiple diagnoses was frequent, including seborrheic dermatitis, irritant dermatitis, other dermatoses, or all 3. p-Phenylenediamine was the most common allergen.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/patología , Dermatitis Irritante/patología , Pruebas del Parche , Dermatosis del Cuero Cabelludo/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/etiología , Dermatitis Atópica/patología , Dermatitis Irritante/epidemiología , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/etiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/patología , Anteojos , Femenino , Tinturas para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Preparaciones para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Humanos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Especificidad de Órganos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dermatosis del Cuero Cabelludo/epidemiología , Dermatosis del Cuero Cabelludo/etiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Eyelid dermatitis is a common dermatologic complaint. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with eyelid dermatitis. METHODS: Retrospective analysis (1994-2016) of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data. RESULTS: Of 50,795 patients, 2332 (4.6%) had eyelid dermatitis only, whereas 1623 (3.2%) also had dermatitis of the eyelids and head or neck. Compared with patients without eyelid involvement (n = 26,130), groups with eyelid dermatitis only and dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck were significantly more likely to be female, white, and older than 40 years, and to have a history of hay fever, atopic dermatitis, or both (P < .01). Final primary diagnoses included allergic contact dermatitis (eyelid dermatitis only: 43.4%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 53.5%), irritant contact dermatitis (eyelid dermatitis only: 17.0%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 9.8%), and atopic dermatitis (eyelid dermatitis only: 13.1%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 13.8%). Top 5 currently relevant allergens included nickel sulfate (eyelid dermatitis only: 18.6%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 22.5%), fragrance mix I (eyelid dermatitis only: 16.5%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 18.3%), methylisothiazolinone (eyelid dermatitis only: 16.5%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 17.7%), gold sodium thiosulfate (eyelid dermatitis only: 14.7%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 11.4%), and balsam of Peru (eyelid dermatitis only: 11.9%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 12.6%). Both eyelid-involvement groups were significantly more likely to react to gold sodium thiosulfate, carmine, shellac, dimethylaminopropylamine, oleamidopropyl dimethylamine, and thimerosal (P < .05) compared with the no eyelid involvement group. LIMITATIONS: Lack of specific distribution patterns of eyelid dermatitis and no long-term follow-up data. CONCLUSION: Patch testing remains a critical tool in evaluating patients with eyelid dermatitis.
Asunto(s)
Blefaritis/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Seborreica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Blefaritis/etiología , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Atópica/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/etiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Párpados/patología , Femenino , Cabeza/patología , Humanos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Metales/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuello/patología , Especificidad de Órganos , Pruebas del Parche , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tensoactivos/efectos adversos , Tiazoles/efectos adversos , Timerosal/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hand eczema (HE) is a heterogeneous and burdensome disorder. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical characteristics, etiologies and allergen relevance in adults with HE referred for patch testing. METHODS: Retrospective analysis (2000-2016) of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data (n = 37,113). RESULTS: Overall, 10,034 patients had HE, with differences of overlap between allergic contact, irritant contact, and atopic dermatitis. Allergic contact HE fluctuated, whereas atopic HE steadily increased, and irritant HE decreased over time. HE was associated with higher proportions of positive patch tests (67.5% vs 63.8%; χ2, P < .0001). The five most common clinically relevant allergens were methylisothiazolinone, nickel, formaldehyde, quaternium-15, and fragrance mix I. HE was associated with significantly higher odds of positive patch test reactions and clinical relevance in 13 and 16 of the 25 most common allergens, respectively, including preservatives, metals, topical medications, and rubber accelerators. LIMITATIONS: No data on HE phenotype. CONCLUSION: HE in adults was associated with higher proportions of positive patch tests, with a heterogeneous profile of allergens. Patch testing remains an important tool in the evaluation of patients with HE.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatosis de la Mano/diagnóstico , Pruebas del Parche , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Canadá/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Irritante/epidemiología , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Seborreica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/etiología , Eccema/diagnóstico , Eccema/epidemiología , Femenino , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/etiología , Humanos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Metales/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Exposure to cleaning and disinfection products has been associated with respiratory disorders such as asthma in cleaning and healthcare workers. Safety data sheets (SDSs) provide information on hazardous chemicals that are present in products to help users with risk assessment and implement appropriate control measures. However, they have potential limitations in identifying respiratory hazards due to a lack of regulatory test methods for respiratory sensitisation and irritation of chemicals. METHODS: SDSs were first used to identify chemicals on the database as respiratory sensitisers and irritants. A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model and an asthmagen list established by the Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics (AOEC) were used to identify potential respiratory sensitisers and irritants (by the AOEC list only) in the cleaning and disinfection products. RESULTS: From a total of 459 cleaning and disinfection products used in healthcare organisations across England and Wales, 35 respiratory sensitisers not labelled as such on the SDS were identified by QSAR or AOEC. Only 2% of cleaning and disinfection products contained at least one respiratory sensitiser as identified by their SDSs; this was increased to 37.7% of products when the QSAR or the AOEC list was used. CONCLUSIONS: A significantly higher proportion of cleaning products contain respiratory hazardous chemicals, particularly respiratory sensitisers than would be expected from the information provided by SDSs alone. Cleaners and healthcare workers may, therefore, be insufficiently protected.