Refocusing generalized myasthenia gravis: Patient burden, disease profiles, and the role of evolving therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) continues to present significant challenges for clinical management due to an unpredictable disease course, frequent disease fluctuations, and varying response to therapy. The recent availability of new pharmacologic therapies presents a valuable opportunity to reevaluate how this disease is classified, assessed, and managed and identify new ways to improve the clinical care of patients with gMG. METHODS: Narrative review was made of publications identified via searches of PubMed and selected congresses (January 2000-September 2022). RESULTS: New consensus definitions are required to ensure consistency, to better characterize patients, and to identify patients who will benefit from specific drugs and earlier use of these agents. There is a need for more frequent, standardized patient assessment to identify the cause of motor function deficits, provide a clearer picture of the disease burden and its impact on daily living and quality of life (QoL), and better support treatment decision-making. Novel approaches that target different components of the immune system will play a role in more precise treatment of patients with gMG, alongside the development of new algorithms to guide individualized patient management. CONCLUSIONS: gMG has a physical, mental, and social impact, resulting in a considerable burden of disease and substantially decreased QoL, despite standard treatments. The availability of novel, targeted treatments that influence key pathological mediators of gMG, together with new biomarkers, offers the potential to optimize patient management and ultimately enables a greater number of patients to achieve minimal manifestation status and a reduced burden of disease.

Expert consensus recommendations for improving and standardising the assessment of patients with generalised myasthenia gravis.

BACKGROUND: Regular and consistent disease assessment could provide a clearer picture of burden in generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG) and improve patient care; however, the use of assessment tools in practice lacks standardisation. This modified Delphi approach was taken to review current evidence on assessment tool use in gMG and develop expert-derived consensus recommendations for good practice. METHODS: A European expert panel of 15 experienced gMG neurologists contributed to development of this consensus, four of whom formed a lead Sub-committee. The PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes) framework was used to define six clinical questions on gMG assessment tools, a systematic literature review was conducted, and evidence-based statements were developed. According to a modified Delphi voting process, consensus was reached when ≥70% of the experts rated agreement with a statement as ≥8 on a scale of 1-10. RESULTS: Eighteen expert- and evidence-based consensus statements based on six themes were developed. Key recommendations include: consistent use of the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living score (MG-ADL) across clinical settings, followed by a simple question (e.g., Patient Acceptable Symptom State [PASS]) or scale to determine patient satisfaction in clinical practice; use of a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis [QMG] or quality of life [QoL] assessment when the MG-ADL indicates disease worsening; and consideration of symptom state to determine the timing and frequency of recommended assessments. Expert panel consensus was reached on all 18 statements after two voting rounds. CONCLUSIONS: This process provided evidence- and expert consensus-based recommendations for the use of objective and subjective assessment tools across gMG research and care to improve management and outcomes for patients.

The epidemiology and societal costs of myasthenia gravis in Norway: A non-interventional study using national registry data.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: With the emergence of new treatment options for myasthenia gravis (MG), there is a need for information regarding epidemiology, healthcare utilization, and societal costs to support economic evaluation and identify eligible patients. We aimed to enhance the understanding of these factors using nationwide systematic registry data in Norway. METHODS: We received comprehensive national registry data from five Norwegian health- and work-related registries. The annual incidence and prevalence were estimated for the period 2013-2021 using nationwide hospital and prescription data. The direct, indirect (productivity losses) and intangible costs (value of lost life-years [LLY] and health-related quality of life [HRQoL]) related to MG were estimated over a period of 1 year. RESULTS: In 2021, the incidence of MG ranged from 15 to 16 cases per year per million population depending on the registry used, while the prevalence varied between 208.9 and 210.3 per million population. The total annual societal costs of MG amounted to EUR 24,743 per patient, of which EUR 3592 (14.5%) were direct costs, EUR 8666 (35.0%) were productivity loss, and EUR 12,485 (50.5%) were lost value from LLY and reduced HRQoL. CONCLUSION: The incidence and prevalence of MG are higher than previously estimated, and the total societal costs of MG are substantial. Our findings demonstrate that productivity losses, and the value of LLY and HRQoL constitute a considerable proportion of the total societal costs.

Generalized myasthenia gravis with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A guidance for treatment.

BACKGROUND: Generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) with antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor is a chronic disease causing muscle weakness. Access to novel treatments warrants authoritative treatment recommendations. The Nordic countries have similar, comprehensive health systems, mandatory health registers, and extensive MG research. METHODS: MG experts and patient representatives from the five Nordic countries formed a working group to prepare treatment guidance for MG based on a systematic literature search and consensus meetings. RESULTS: Pyridostigmine represents the first-line symptomatic treatment, while ambenonium and beta adrenergic agonists are second-line options. Early thymectomy should be undertaken if a thymoma, and in non-thymoma patients up to the age of 50-65 years if not obtaining remission on symptomatic treatment. Most patients need immunosuppressive drug treatment. Combining corticosteroids at the lowest possible dose with azathioprine is recommended, rituximab being an alternative first-line option. Mycophenolate, methotrexate, and tacrolimus represent second-line immunosuppression. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin are used for myasthenic crises and acute exacerbations. Novel complement inhibitors and FcRn blockers are effective and fast-acting treatments with promising safety profiles. Their use depends on local availability, refunding policies, and cost-benefit analyses. Adapted physical training is recommended. Planning of pregnancies with optimal treatment, information, and awareness of neonatal MG is necessary. Social support and adaptation of work and daily life activities are recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Successful treatment of MG rests on timely combination of different interventions. Due to spontaneous disease fluctuations, comorbidities, and changes in life conditions, regular long-term specialized follow-up is needed. Most patients do reasonably well but there is room for further improvement. Novel treatments are promising, though subject to restricted access due to costs.

Improving Outcome in Severe Myasthenia Gravis and Guillain-Barré Syndrome.

When progressive and severe, myasthenia gravis and Guillain-Barré syndrome may have the potential for fatal and unfavorable clinical outcomes. Regardless of important differences in their clinical course, the development of weakness of oropharyngeal muscles and respiratory failure with requirement of mechanical ventilation is the main driver of poor prognosis in both conditions. The need for prolonged mechanical ventilation is particularly relevant because it immobilizes the patient and care becomes extraordinarily complex due to daily risks of systemic complications. Additionally, patients with myasthenia gravis often require long-term immunosuppressive treatments with associated toxicity and infectious risks. Unlike myasthenia gravis, the recovery period is prolonged in Guillain-Barré syndrome, but often favorable, even in the more severely affected patients. Outcome, for a large part, is determined by expert neurocritical care.

Systematic review of the patient burden of generalised myasthenia gravis in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by muscle weakness, and progression from ocular (oMG) to generalised (gMG) symptoms results in a substantial negative impact on quality of life (QoL). This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the patient burden experienced by people living with gMG. METHODS: Electronic database searches (conducted March 2022), supplemented by interrogation of grey literature, were conducted to identify studies reporting patient burden outcomes in patients with gMG in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Results were synthesised narratively due to the heterogeneity across trials. RESULTS: In total, 39 patient burden publications (representing 38 unique studies) were identified as relevant for inclusion in the systematic review, consisting of 37 publications reporting formal patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and two publications describing alternative qualitative assessments of patient experience. The studies included a variety of measures including generic and disease-specific PROMs, as well as symptom-specific PROMs focusing on key comorbidities including depression, anxiety, fatigue and sleep disturbance. The findings showed some variation across studies and PROMs; however, in general there was evidence for worse QoL in patients with gMG than in healthy controls or in patients with oMG, and a trend for worsening QoL with increasing MG severity. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the importance of considering patient QoL when developing and assessing treatment and management plans for patients with gMG. However, the heterogeneity identified across studies illustrates the need for further representative and well-powered studies in large cohorts administering consistent, validated questionnaires. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42022328444.

Pregnancy in myasthenia gravis: a retrospective analysis of maternal and neonatal outcome from a large tertiary care centre in Germany.

PURPOSE: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, potentially life-threatening autoimmune disease with fluctuating muscle weakness frequently affecting women of childbearing age. MG can affect maternal as well as neonatal outcome with risk of worsening of myasthenic symptoms in the mothers and risk of transient neonatal myasthenia gravis (TNMG) and arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) or foetal acetylcholine receptor antibody-associated disorders (FARAD) in the neonates. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of maternal and neonatal outcome in a cohort of pregnant MG patients treated at a tertiary care centre in Germany. RESULTS: Overall, 66 pregnancies were analysed. During 40 (63%) pregnancies, women experienced a worsening of myasthenic symptoms, of whom 10 patients (15.7%) needed acute therapy with IVIg or plasma exchange. There was no case of myasthenic crisis. Rate of caesarean section was comparable to the overall C-section rate at our centre (38% vs. 40%). However, there was a slightly higher rate for operative vaginal delivery (15% vs. 10%) as potential indicator for fatiguing striated musculature in MG patients during the expulsion stage. Rate of TNMG as well as AMC was 3% (two cases each). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal and neonatal outcome in our cohort was favourable with a low rate of myasthenic exacerbations requiring acute therapies and a low rate of TNMG and AMC/FARAD. Our data might help neurologists and obstetricians to advice MG patients with desire to have children.

Management of apixaban anticoagulation in a patient requiring therapeutic plasma exchange: a case report and a literature review.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is used as an effective treatment modality for a variety of autoimmune disorders. Apart from its desired effect of removing pathological blood components, it also can remove coagulation factors and drugs. Currently, there is an insufficient amount of information regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants in this setting. In this article, we present a case report of a patient with myasthenia gravis and chronic anticoagulation with apixaban who underwent a series of TPE while continuing apixaban treatment. We observed that only 10% of daily dose was removed by the procedure and plasma levels of apixaban corresponded with expected range. TPE was not associated with shortened drug plasma half-life. We did not observe any significant alteration of apixaban pharmacokinetics during the period of TPE therapy, as well as no thrombotic or bleeding events. This case report supports the use of apixaban in patients treated by TPE, nevertheless, to firmly establish apixaban efficacy and safety profile in this clinical setting further research is needed.

[Myasthenia gravis-Gender aspects and family planning]. / Myasthenia gravis ­ Genderaspekte und Familienplanung.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that gender-specific differences can influence the diagnostics, treatment and long-term disease course of myasthenia gravis (MG). In women the diagnosis is often made during childbearing age. OBJECTIVE: Gender-specific differences in MG and relevant aspects in routine clinical practice are presented. In addition, current studies on family planning, pregnancy and childbirth in MG are highlighted and treatment recommendations are derived. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Narrative literature review. RESULTS: In addition to sociodemographic data, gender-specific differences encompass clinical as well as paraclinical factors, such as disease severity and antibody status. With few exceptions pregnancy is possible with good maternal and neonatal outcome. During pregnancy and peripartum, children of MG patients should be closely monitored for early detection and treatment of potential syndromes caused by diaplacental transfer of maternal antibodies. CONCLUSION: Gender-specific factors can influence the course of MG. Adequate medical counselling and multidisciplinary collaboration are essential for MG patients who wish to have children.

[Myasthenia Gravis - Update]. / Myasthenia gravis ­ Update.

Myasthenia gravis - still a challenge for sufferers and doctors in 2023. But which therapy is best suited? Our clinically experienced experts have summarized the current guidelines for diagnosis and treatment in order to provide optimal support for those affected. Find out how you can carry out a quick and targeted diagnosis and which treatment options are available to alleviate the course of the disease.

[Novel immunomodulatory therapies in myasthenia gravis]. / Myasthénie grave : nouvelles thérapies immunosuppressives.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by fluctuating weakness of skeletal muscles. Despite current treatments, a significant percentage of patients remain symptomatic. This review explores new immunosuppressive therapies and ongoing clinical trials in MG, including depletion of B lymphocytes with agents such as rituximab and inebilizumab, as well as the use of eculizumab, efgartigimod, satralizumab, tocilizumab, and CAR-T (Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T) cell therapy. These advancements aim to improve disease control and patients' quality of life.

La myasthénie grave (MG) est une maladie auto-immune caractérisée par une faiblesse fluctuante des muscles squelettiques. Malgré les traitements classiques, un pourcentage significatif de patients reste symptomatique. Cet article explore les nouvelles thérapies immunosuppressives et les essais cliniques en cours pour la MG, notamment la déplétion des lymphocytes B avec des agents tels que le rituximab et l'inébilizumab, ainsi que l'utilisation de l'éculizumab, de l'efgartigimod, du satralizumab, du tocilizumab et de la thérapie par cellules CAR-T (Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T). Ces avancées visent à améliorer le contrôle de la maladie et la qualité de vie des patients.

Atypical Myasthenia gravis in an older person resulting in delayed diagnosis: a case report.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune neuromuscular disorder characterised by varying degrees of skeletal muscle weakness. Diagnosing MG represents a challenge for clinicians due to the diversity of disease manifestations. We present an unusual case of this disease in an older gentleman in which the patient reported swollen tongue and lips which was incorrectly diagnosed and treated as angioedema. Months later, he developed progressive dysphagia, dysarthria and weight loss. The diagnosis was further delayed by the identification of a hiatal hernia and Zenker's diverticulum after extensive investigation for dysphagia. A total of 15 months on prompted by persistent symptoms, the patient was found to have MG by positive antibody test and Electromyogram. Treatment was initiated which led to a rapid and significant relief of his symptoms.

[Clinical Features of Myasthenia Gravis as an Immune-related Adverse Event].

Neurological and muscular immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with cancer treatment using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may show a diverse clinical presentation. Myasthenia gravis (MG) represents a serious irAE associated with the aforementioned therapy. Recent studies have discussed the clinical features of MG that occurs as an irAE (irAE-MG). The incidence of irAE-MG is estimated to be 1%. This complication occurs during the early phase of ICI treatment and rapidly worsens, resulting in severe bulbar muscle involvement and myasthenic crisis and significantly elevated serum creatine kinase levels. MG and myositis, which may occur concomitantly as irAEs are often indistinguishable. Myocarditis is occasionally observed in patients with irAE-MG and can cause severe heart failure and lethal arrhythmias, with a fatal outcome. Kv1.4 antibodies serve as biomarkers of severe irAE-MG and myocarditis. Immunotherapy with corticosteroids is effective for management of irAE-MG and should be initiated promptly. Collaboration between consulting neurologists is necessary for safe management of cancer immunotherapy.

Healthcare resource utilization, costs and treatment associated with myasthenia gravis exacerbations among patients with myasthenia gravis in the USA: a retrospective analysis of claims data.

Aim: There are limited data on the clinical and economic burden of exacerbations in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). We assessed patient clinical characteristics, treatments and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with MG exacerbation. Patients & methods: This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with MG identified by commercial, Medicare or Medicaid insurance claims from the IBM® MarketScan® database. Eligible patients had two or more MG diagnosis codes, without evidence of exacerbation or crisis in the baseline period (12 months prior to index [first eligible MG diagnosis]). Clinical characteristics were evaluated at baseline and 12 weeks before each exacerbation. Number of exacerbations, MG treatments and HCRU costs associated with exacerbation were described during a 2-year follow-up period. Results: Among 9352 prevalent MG patients, 34.4% (n = 3218) experienced ≥1 exacerbation after index: commercial, 53.0% (n = 1706); Medicare, 39.4% (n = 1269); and Medicaid, 7.6% (n = 243). During follow-up, the mean (standard deviation) number of exacerbations per commercial and Medicare patient was 3.7 (7.0) and 2.7 (4.1), respectively. At least two exacerbations were experienced by approximately half of commercial and Medicare patients with ≥1 exacerbation. Mean total MG-related healthcare costs per exacerbation ranged from $26,078 to $51,120, and from $19,903 to $49,967 for commercial and Medicare patients, respectively. AChEI use decreased in patients with multiple exacerbations, while intravenous immunoglobulin use increased with multiple exacerbations. Conclusion: Despite utilization of current treatments for MG, MG exacerbations are associated with a high clinical and economic burden in both commercial and Medicare patients. Additional treatment options and improved disease management may help to reduce exacerbations and disease burden.

Current state of research on exercise for the treatment of myasthenia gravis: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive overview of existing evidence, research gaps, and future research priorities concerning the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) using exercise therapies. METHOD: Clinical studies on exercise treatment for MG were searched in nine databases to conduct a scoping review. Two independent researchers screened the literature and comprehensively analyzed the characteristics and limitations of the included articles. RESULTS: A total of 5725 studies were retrieved, of which 24 were included. The included studies were conducted in 16 different countries/regions and 456 patients were enrolled. Study designs included both interventional and observational studies. Exercise interventions included aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, balance training, and stretch training, and are typically administered in conjunction with medication, usual care, or some other interventions. The intensity, frequency, and duration of exercise interventions varied hugely among studies. Six-minute walk test, adverse events, muscle strength, MG quality of life-15 scale, forced vital capacity, quantitative MG scale, and MG activities of daily living scale were the most frequently used outcomes. All studies reported results in favor of the efficacy and safety of exercise in MG, and exercise-related adverse events were reported in two studies. CONCLUSION: This scoping review provides an overview of the evidence concerning exercise treatment for MG. Key gaps in evidence include a limited number of participants, complex interventions, variability in outcome selection, and insufficient reporting in publications. The promotion of exercise treatment for MG still encounters several obstacles. A larger population, rigorous study design and conduction, standardized interventions and outcomes, and standardized reporting are essential.

Acupuncture and moxibustion treatment for myasthenia gravis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a common autoimmune disease that often involves the skeletal muscle of the whole body and seriously affects patients' quality of life. Acupuncture and moxibustion treatment of MG has unique advantages, the aim is to evaluate the clinical effect of acupuncture and moxibustion on MG. METHODS: The literature on acupuncture and moxibustion treating MG in PubMed, CochraneLibrary, EMBASE, SCI, China Academic Journals full-text database, China Biology Medicine disc, VIP and Wanfang database were searched through computers from the establishment of the database to December 2022. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were included, involving 658 patients, where 330 in the treatment group and 328 in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the treatment group performed better than the control group in improving the total clinical response rate (OR = 3.26, 95%[2.04,5.21], P < .01). Additionally, the treatment group outperformed the control group in raising the absolute clinical score (MD = -3.48, 95%CI[-5.17, -1.78], P < .01). However, there was no significant difference between the treatment group and the control group in improving the level of serum interleukin-6 receptor (MD = -1.45,95%CI[-6.85,3.95], P > .05) and OMG quantitative score (MD = -2.16,95%CI[-4.85,0.52], P > .05). The total clinical effective rate was tested for publication bias, which showed that the 2 sides of the funnel plot were asymmetrical, suggesting the possible existence of publication bias. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture and moxibustion has a good effect on MG, which is better than conventional Western medicine in improving the total clinical effective rate and absolute clinical score.

Myasthenia gravis.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular junction disorder that is characterized by fatigable weakness of muscles. People with MG experience various clinical manifestations based on the muscles involved. MG can be autoimmune, paraneoplastic, congenital, medication-related, or transient in the neonatal period due to the passive placental transfer of antibodies from mothers with MG. Acetylcholine receptor antibodies are seen in the majority of patients with MG. However, other antibodies have been discovered in the last 20 years, including muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) and lipoprotein-related peptide 4 (LRP4), and are now available through commercial testing. More recently, a handful of other antibodies have been associated with MG; however, they are not presently available for routine testing. A disease classification system has been developed by the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) and is commonly used worldwide. A number of objective and subjective outcome measures have been developed and validated over the years and have been proven useful for both clinical and research purposes, serving as primary and secondary outcome measures in most clinical trials. A growing number of therapies are available for both acute and chronic management of MG, with several new mechanistic approaches under investigation. An international consensus guidance for the management of MG was first published in 2016 and updated in 2020.

[Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody Neutralization and Selective B-Cell Suppression Using Fc Fusion Protein].

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by formation of autoantibodies against the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR). Some patients do not show sufficient improvement and develop adverse effects following administration of conventional immune therapy; therefore, the development of new treatments is important. Based on the concept of "selective removal of pathogenic antibodies and cells without suppression of normal immunity," we are developing a fusion protein referred to as AChR-Fc (composed of the AChR alpha subunit and Fc region of human immunoglobulin G1), which shows the following mechanisms of action: selective neutralization of AChR antibodies and cytotoxic activity against AChR antibody-producing pathogenic B cells. Treatment with AChR-Fc is a novel therapeutic approach that may be useful in the management of MG.

Use of the Superficialized Brachial Artery as Vascular Access for a Patient with Myasthenia Gravis with a Frequent Need for Plasmapheresis.

A 41-year-old woman diagnosed with seronegative myasthenia gravis struggled to maintain remission for a decade, facing crises every 3 months for several years. After repeated apheresis using a non-tunneled non-cuffed central venous dialysis catheter (NTNCC), complications such as catheter-related thrombus in the internal jugular veins and morbid obesity from steroids made the insertion of NTNCC increasingly difficult, leading to consideration of an alternative permanent vascular access (VA) approach. Thus, we created a subcutaneously superficialized brachial artery as the VA, which allowed the patient to undergo safe and uninterrupted apheresis therapy.

HSCT for stiff person syndrome and myasthenia gravis.

Recent advances in neuroimmunology have shed light on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying rare neuroimmunologic conditions such as myasthenia gravis (MG) and stiff person syndrome (SPS). Despite the rarity of these conditions, their complex manifestations and potential for irreversible disability necessitate effective therapeutic strategies. This chapter reviews the current understanding of the safety and efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in MG and SPS. Several case reports and retrospective studies have demonstrated promising outcomes following HSCT in refractory MG and SPS, with significant clinical improvement and even discontinuation of chronic immunomodulatory therapy in some cases. Furthermore, HSCT may offer insights into the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of these conditions, particularly the role of cellular immunity. Although more research is needed to fully understand the impact of HSCT on disease pathology and outcomes, current evidence suggests that HSCT could be a valuable therapeutic option for patients with refractory MG and SPS.