Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 193
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 71(5): 1326-1331, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34091608

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Comparing BAL and antibiotic therapy with antibiotic therapy itself for treating VAP patients in ICU. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, the first group was treated using antibiotics and closed-suction was performed daily, using 50 cc of sterile normal saline. The second group was treated with antibiotics and daily closed-suction with 50 cc of sterile normal saline, plus bronchoscopic suction every other day. Patients of both groups were followed and investigated one, 3, 7, and 10 days after initial diagnosis. RESULTS: Mean blood leukocyte count and body temperature was measured in groups one (no bronchoscopy) and two (with bronchoscopy) in first, 3rd, 7th, and 10th days which was higher in the second group. Mean treatment status was also measured using APACHE II index. There was also a statistically significant difference in 3rd day (p-value < 0.05). There was also no difference in final culture result or mortality rate between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this study like lower body temperature, higher leukocyte count reduction, and lower APACHE II scores in the second group, treated with bronchoscopic suction, adding bronchoscopy seems to be more useful than normal method.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Broncoscopía , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Respiración Artificial , Succión
2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 39(3): 483-491, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31823149

RESUMEN

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are intended to support clinical decisions and should be based on high-quality evidence. The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of evidence supporting the recommendations issued in CPGs for therapy, diagnosis, and prevention of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). CPGs released by international scientific societies after year 2000, using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, were analyzed. Number and strength of recommendations and quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, and very low) were extracted and indexed in the aforementioned sections. High-quality evidence was based on randomized control trials (RCT) without important limitations and exceptionally on rigorous observational studies. Eighty recommendations were assessed, with 7 (8.7%), 24 (30.0%), 29 (36.3%), and 20 (25.0%) being supported by high, moderate, low, and very low-quality evidence, respectively. Highest evidence degree was reported for 26 prevention recommendations, with 7 (26.9%) supported by high-quality evidence and no recommendation based on very low-quality evidence. In contrast, among 9 recommendations for diagnosis and 45 for therapy, none was supported by high-quality evidence, in spite of being recommended as strong in 33.3% and 46.7%, respectively. Among HAP/VAP diagnosis recommendations, the majority of evidence was rated as low or very low-quality (55.6% and 22.2%, respectively) whereas among HAP/VAP therapy recommendations, 4/5 were rated as low and very low-quality (40% each). In conclusion, among HAP/VAP international guidelines, most recommendations, particularly in therapy, remain supported by observational studies, case reports, and expert opinion. Well-designed RCTs are urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Adulto , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
3.
Crit Care ; 24(1): 383, 2020 06 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32600375

RESUMEN

In accordance with the recommendations of, amongst others, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and the recently published European treatment guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), in the event of a patient with such infections, empirical antibiotic treatment must be appropriate and administered as early as possible. The aim of this manuscript is to update treatment protocols by reviewing recently published studies on the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in the critically ill patients that require invasive respiratory support and patients with HAP from hospital wards that require invasive mechanical ventilation. An interdisciplinary group of experts, comprising specialists in anaesthesia and resuscitation and in intensive care medicine, updated the epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance and established clinical management priorities based on patients' risk factors. Implementation of rapid diagnostic microbiological techniques available and the new antibiotics recently added to the therapeutic arsenal has been reviewed and updated. After analysis of the categories outlined, some recommendations were suggested, and an algorithm to update empirical and targeted treatment in critically ill patients has also been designed. These aspects are key to improve VAP outcomes because of the severity of patients and possible acquisition of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).


Asunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/tendencias , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Guías como Asunto , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/fisiopatología , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/fisiopatología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(1): 193-200, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31001694

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Some publications suggest high rates of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and of nosocomial pneumonia portending a poor prognosis in ICU cancer patients. A better understanding of the epidemiology of HAIs in these patients is needed. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all the patients hospitalized for ≥ 48 h during a 12-year period in the 12-bed ICU of the Gustave Roussy hospital, monitored prospectively for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and bloodstream infection (BSI) and for use of medical devices. RESULTS: During 3388 first stays in the ICU, 198 cases of VAP and 103 primary, 213 secondary, and 77 catheter-related BSIs were recorded. The VAP rate was 24.5/1000 ventilator days (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.2-28.0); the catheter-related BSI rate was 2.3/1000 catheter days (95% CI 1.8-2.8). The cumulative incidence during the first 25 days of exposure was 58.8% (95% CI 49.1-66.6%) for VAP, 8.9% (95% CI, 6.2-11.5%) for primary, 15.1% (95% CI 11.6-18.5%) for secondary and 5.0% (95% CI 3.2-6.8%) for catheter-related BSIs. VAP or BSIs were not associated with a higher risk of ICU mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report HAI rates in a large cohort of critically ill cancer patients. Although both the incidence of VAP and the rate of BSI are higher than in general ICU populations, this does not impact patient outcomes. The occurrence of device-associated infections is essentially due to severe medical conditions in patients and to the characteristics of malignancy.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Anciano , Bacteriemia/complicaciones , Bacteriemia/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/terapia , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/terapia
5.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 200(9): 1126-1133, 2019 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31260638

RESUMEN

Rationale: Infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria are a major clinical challenge. Phage therapy is a promising alternative antibacterial strategy.Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous phage therapy for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in rats.Methods: In a randomized, blinded, controlled experimental study, we compared intravenous teicoplanin (3 mg/kg, n = 12), a cocktail of four phages (2-3 × 109 plaque-forming units/ml of 2003, 2002, 3A, and K; n = 12), and a combination of both (n = 11) given 2, 12, and 24 hours after induction of pneumonia, and then once daily for 4 days. The primary outcome was survival at Day 4. Secondary outcomes were bacterial and phage densities in lungs and spleen, histopathological scoring of infection within the lungs, and inflammatory biomarkers in blood.Measurements and Main Results: Treatment with either phages or teicoplanin increased survival from 0% to 58% and 50%, respectively (P < 0.005). The combination of phages and antibiotics did not further improve outcomes (45% survival). Animal survival correlated with reduced bacterial burdens in the lung (1.2 × 106 cfu/g of tissue for survivors vs. 1.2 × 109 cfu/g for nonsurviving animals; P < 0.0001), as well as improved histopathological outcomes. Phage multiplication within the lung occurred during treatment. IL-1ß increased in all treatment groups over the course of therapy.Conclusions: Phage therapy was as effective as teicoplanin in improving survival and decreasing bacterial load within the lungs of rats infected with methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Combining antibiotics with phage therapy did not further improve outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Terapia de Fagos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/terapia , Animales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriófagos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Masculino , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico
6.
J Intensive Care Med ; 34(6): 503-510, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28403662

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Study of inflammatory biomarkers which may aid in early detection of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in children and predicting their outcome. PATIENTS: Thirty-five children, aged 2 months to 13 years, needed mechanical ventilation (MV) for more than 48 hours due to causes other than pneumonia. METHODS: Measurement of serum amyloid A (SAA) protein, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1), and C-reactive protein (CRP), modified clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) and performing culture of endotracheal aspirate at the start and on the third day of MV. RESULTS: Ventilator-associated pneumonia was diagnosed by CPIS in 6 (17.1%) of 35 patients. On the third day of MV, there was a significant increase in serum mean levels of SAA, sICAM-1, and CRP in comparison to the start of MV ( P = .005, .004, and .01, respectively). Three (50%) of 6 patients with VAP died, while 4 (14.28%) of 28 patients without VAP died. The sensitivity of serum SAA, sICAM-1, and CPIS were 100% for predicting VAP, while specificity was highest for CPIS (96.55%) followed by SAA (93.1%). Combination of CPIS and SAA increased the specificity to 100%. For predicting nonsurvival, serum SAA and sICAM-1 had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 92.86% and 89.29%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Serum amyloid A and sICAM-1 may be considered as reliable markers for detection of VAP. Combination of serum SAA with CPIS increased the specificity to 100%. Measurement of SAA in patients with VAP also had a good predictive value for nonsurvival in such patients.


Asunto(s)
Molécula 1 de Adhesión Intercelular/sangre , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/sangre , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Proteína Amiloide A Sérica/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/sangre , Niño , Preescolar , Egipto , Humanos , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/fisiopatología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos
7.
Med Sci Monit ; 25: 5401-5407, 2019 Jul 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31326975

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of mechanical ventilation combined with fiberoptic bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with severe pulmonary infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS We randomly divided 81 patients with severe pulmonary infection into a control group (n=40) and an observation group (n=41). Both groups were treated using mechanical ventilation, and observation group additionally received assistive fiberoptic bronchoalveolar lavage. RESULTS The cure rate and effectiveness rate in the observation group were higher than in the control group (P<0.05, χ²=3.2), and the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05, χ²=9.4). The partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and oxygen saturation (SaO2) were higher in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05, t=3.862, t=33.595), whereas the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and respiratory rate were lower in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05, t=3.307, t=5.043). The levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) in the 2 groups were lower after treatment than before treatment (all P<0.05), and the levels in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Hospital stay, infection control window appearance time, invasive mechanical ventilation time, and total mechanical ventilation time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05, t=13.990, t=8.643, t=9.717, t=8.980). CONCLUSIONS Mechanical ventilation combined with fiberoptic bronchoalveolar lavage can effectively improve the curative effects and the blood gas and inflammation indicators in patients.


Asunto(s)
Lavado Broncoalveolar/métodos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Anciano , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre , China , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones , Pulmón/microbiología , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes , Neumonía/terapia , Distribución Aleatoria , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 66(1): 72-80, 2018 01 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29020279

RESUMEN

Background: Studies indicate that the prevalence of multidrug-resistant infections, including hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP), has been rising. There are many challenges associated with these disease conditions and the ability to develop new treatments. Additionally, HABP/VABP clinical trials are very costly to conduct given their complex protocol designs and the difficulty in recruiting and retaining patients. Methods: With input from clinicians, representatives from industry, and the US Food and Drug Administration, we conducted a study to (1) evaluate the drivers of HABP/VABP phase 3 direct and indirect clinical trial costs; (2) to identify opportunities to lower these costs; and (3) to compare (1) and (2) to endocrine and oncology clinical trials. Benchmark data were gathered from proprietary and commercial databases and used to create a model that calculates the fully loaded (direct and indirect) cost of typical phase 3 HABP/VABP endocrine and oncology clinical trials. Results: Results indicate that the cost per patient for a 200-site, 1000-patient phase 3 HABP/VABP study is $89600 per patient. The cost of screen failures and screen failure rates are the main cost drivers. Conclusions: Results indicate that biopharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies should consider strategies to improve screening and recruitment to decrease HABP/VABP clinical trial costs.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/terapia , Neumonía Bacteriana/terapia , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/economía , Hospitales , Humanos , Neumonía Bacteriana/economía , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/economía
9.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 24(1): 49-54, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29257783

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advances in the understanding of the human microbiome outside of the ICU have led investigators to consider the role of the microbiome in critical illness. The picture that is being elucidated is one of dysbiosis occurring at multiple sites in the critically ill patient. This review describes the changes that occur in the various microbiomes of a critically ill patient, the implications of these changes and shows how advances in the understanding of dysbiosis may lead to microbiome-targeted therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Critically ill patients undergo dysbiosis at several organ sites including the skin, gastrointestinal system and the lungs with loss of microbial diversity and a propensity for potentially pathogenic organisms to dominate a particular microbiome. These microbiome changes appear to be predictive of clinical outcome. While the use of fecal microbial transplantation has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, the use of fecal microbial transplantation and other microbiome modifying therapies may have a role in managing critical illness in the ICU. SUMMARY: A growing understanding of the microbiome in the critically ill may modify current dogma regarding the pathogenesis of sepsis and other life-threatening conditions seen in the ICU, thereby fundamentally changing antibiotic stewardship and the management of the critically ill patient.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Disbiosis/microbiología , Microbiota/fisiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Colitis Ulcerosa/microbiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Disbiosis/etiología , Disbiosis/terapia , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Infect Chemother ; 24(10): 795-801, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30037757

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The preventive association of synbiotics therapy has not been thoroughly clarified in mechanically ventilated patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether synbiotics therapy has preventive association against septic complications in ventilated critically ill patients. METHODS: Critically ill patients who were mechanically ventilated were included in this retrospective observational study. Patients who received synbiotics (Bifidobacterium breve, Lactobacillus casei, and galactooligosaccharides) within 3 days after admission (denoted as synbiotics group) were compared with patients who did not receive synbiotics. The incidences of enteritis, pneumonia, and bacteremia were evaluated as clinical outcome. Enteritis was defined as an acute onset of diarrhea consisting of continuous liquid watery stools for more than 12 h. The confounding factors include APACHE II on admission, gender, the cause of admission and antibiotics. RESULTS: We included 179 patients in this study: 57 patients received synbiotics and 122 patients did not receive synbiotics. The incidences of enteritis were significantly lower in the synbiotics group compared with the control group (3.5% vs. 15.6%; p < 0.05). The odds ratios for diarrhea-free days during the first 28 days for the synbiotics group as compared with the controls were 4.354 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.407 to 7.877; p < 0.001) in an ordinal logistic regression model with propensity scores. The odds ratios for pneumonia-free days during the first 28 days for the synbiotics group were 2.529 (95% CI, 1.715 to 3.731; p < 0.001). The incidences of bacteremia did not have significant differences. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic synbiotics appeared to have preventive association on enteritis and pneumonia in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.


Asunto(s)
Diarrea/terapia , Oligosacáridos/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Simbióticos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Bacteriemia/etiología , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Bacteriemia/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica , Diarrea/etiología , Diarrea/prevención & control , Enteritis/etiología , Enteritis/prevención & control , Enteritis/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/etiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Eur Respir J ; 50(3)2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28890434

RESUMEN

The most recent European guidelines and task force reports on hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) were published almost 10 years ago. Since then, further randomised clinical trials of HAP and VAP have been conducted and new information has become available. Studies of epidemiology, diagnosis, empiric treatment, response to treatment, new antibiotics or new forms of antibiotic administration and disease prevention have changed old paradigms. In addition, important differences between approaches in Europe and the USA have become apparent.The European Respiratory Society launched a project to develop new international guidelines for HAP and VAP. Other European societies, including the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, were invited to participate and appointed their representatives. The Latin American Thoracic Association was also invited.A total of 15 experts and two methodologists made up the panel. Three experts from the USA were also invited (Michael S. Niederman, Marin Kollef and Richard Wunderink).Applying the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, the panel selected seven PICO (population-intervention-comparison-outcome) questions that generated a series of recommendations for HAP/VAP diagnosis, treatment and prevention.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/normas , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sociedades Médicas
12.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 23(2): 167-174, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28092309

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The composition and diversity of the microbiota of the human gut, skin, and several other sites is severely deranged in critically ill patients on the ICU, and it is likely that these disruptions can negatively affect outcome. We here review new and ongoing studies that investigate the use of microbiota-targeted therapeutics in the ICU, and provide recommendations for future research. RECENT FINDINGS: Practically every intervention in the ICU as well as the physiological effects of critical illness itself can have a profound impact on the gut microbiota. Therapeutic modulation of the microbiota, aimed at restoring the balance between 'pathogenic' and 'health-promoting' microbes is therefore of significant interest. Probiotics have shown to be effective in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and the first fecal microbiota transplantations have recently been safely and successfully performed in the ICU. However, all-encompassing data in this vulnerable patient group remain sparse, and only a handful of novel studies that study microbiota-targeted therapies in the ICU are currently ongoing. SUMMARY: Enormous strides have been made in characterizing the gut microbiome of critically ill patients in the ICU, and an increasing amount of preclinical data reveals the huge potential of microbiota-targeted therapies. Further understanding of the causes and consequences of dysbiosis on ICU-related outcomes are warranted to push the field forward.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Microbiota , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Disbiosis , Humanos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología
13.
Crit Care ; 21(1): 156, 2017 06 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28625166

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common and serious problem in intensive care units (ICUs). Several studies have suggested that the Gram stain of endotracheal aspirates is a useful method for accurately diagnosing VAP. However, the usefulness of the Gram stain in predicting which microorganisms cause VAP has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a Gram stain of endotracheal aspirates could be used to determine appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy for VAP. METHODS: Data on consecutive episodes of microbiologically confirmed VAP were collected from February 2013 to February 2016 in the ICU of a tertiary care hospital in Japan. We constructed two hypothetical empirical antimicrobial treatment algorithms for VAP: a guidelines-based algorithm (GLBA) based on the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society-Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS-IDSA) guidelines and a Gram stain-based algorithm (GSBA) which limited the choice of initial antimicrobials according to the results of bedside Gram stains. The GLBA and the GSBA were retrospectively reviewed for each VAP episode. The initial coverage rates and the selection of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents were compared between the two algorithms. RESULTS: During the study period, 219 suspected VAP episodes were observed and 131 episodes were assessed for analysis. Appropriate antimicrobial coverage rates were not significantly different between the two algorithms (GLBA 95.4% versus GSBA 92.4%; p = 0.134). The number of episodes for which antimethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents were selected as an initial treatment was larger in the GLBA than in the GSBA (71.0% versus 31.3%; p < 0.001), as were the number of episodes for which antipseudomonal agents were recommended as an initial treatment (70.2% versus 51.9%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial treatment based on Gram stain results may restrict the administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents without increasing the risk of treatment failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR, UMIN000026457 . Registered 8 March 2017 (retrospectively registered).


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Violeta de Genciana/análisis , Guías como Asunto/normas , Fenazinas/análisis , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Anciano , Algoritmos , Estudios de Cohortes , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 67(11): 1714-1718, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29171566

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess knowledge and practices of critical care health professionals related to ventilator associated pneumonia. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted at eight tertiary care public and private hospitals of Islamabad/Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from September 2015 to March 2016, and comprised healthcare professionals. Stratified random sampling was used. Data was collected using close-ended validated questionnaire. SPSS 22 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of the 153 participants, 45(29.4%) were doctors, 91(59.4%) were nurses and 17(11.1%) were respiratory therapists. The overall mean age was 31±8.14 years. The overall mean knowledge and practice scores regarding prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia were 11.14±3.12 and 8.83±1.53, respectively. The mean knowledge score was 11.77±3.84 for physicians, 10.84± 2.91 for nurses and 10.82±1.94 for respiratory therapists. However, the best practice scores were seen in the respiratory therapists 9.64±0.78 (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the participants had adequate knowledge and even better practices, particularly respiratory therapists.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pakistán/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 63(5): e61-e111, 2016 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27418577

RESUMEN

It is important to realize that guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. IDSA considers adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual circumstances.These guidelines are intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for patients at risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), including specialists in infectious diseases, pulmonary diseases, critical care, and surgeons, anesthesiologists, hospitalists, and any clinicians and healthcare providers caring for hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of HAP and VAP are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/terapia , Neumonía Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Neumonía Bacteriana/terapia , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Estados Unidos
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 63(5): 575-82, 2016 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27521441

RESUMEN

It is important to realize that guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. IDSA considers adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual circumstances.These guidelines are intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for patients at risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), including specialists in infectious diseases, pulmonary diseases, critical care, and surgeons, anesthesiologists, hospitalists, and any clinicians and healthcare providers caring for hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of HAP and VAP are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/terapia , Neumonía Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Neumonía Bacteriana/terapia , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos
17.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 35(3): 387-96, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26753990

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (hvKP) induced ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and the microbiological characteristics and epidemiology of the hvKP strains. A retrospective study of 49 mechanically ventilated patients with K. pneumoniae induced VAP was conducted at a university hospital in China from January 2014 to December 2014. Clinical characteristics and K. pneumoniae antimicrobial susceptibility and biofilm formation were analyzed. Genes of capsular serotypes K1, K2, K5, K20, K54 and K57 and virulence factors plasmid rmpA(p-rmpA), iroB, iucA, mrkD, entB, iutA, ybtS, kfu and allS were also evaluated. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses were used to study the clonal relationship of the K. pneumoniae strains. Strains possessed p-rmpA and iroB and iucA were defined as hvKP. Of 49 patients, 14 patients (28.6 %) were infected by hvKP. Antimicrobial resistant rate was significantly higher in cKP than that in hvKP. One ST29 K54 extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing hvKP strain was detected. The prevalence of K1 and K2 in hvKP was 42.9 % and 21.4 %, respectively. The incidences of K1, K2, K20, p-rmpA, iroB, iucA, iutA, Kfu and alls were significantly higher in hvKP than those in cKP. ST23 was dominant among hvKP strains, and all the ST23 strains had identical RAPD pattern. hvKP has become a common pathogen of VAP in mechanically ventilated patients in China. Clinicians should increase awareness of hvKP induced VAP and enhance epidemiologic surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/patogenicidad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , China/epidemiología , Análisis por Conglomerados , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/terapia , Klebsiella pneumoniae/clasificación , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Serogrupo , Ventiladores Mecánicos/efectos adversos , Virulencia/genética
18.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16: 349, 2016 07 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27448800

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America/The American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) provide recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). However, the mere presence of guidelines is rarely sufficient to promote widespread adoption and uptake. Using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model framework, we undertook a study to understand barriers and facilitators to the adoption of the IDSA/ATS guidelines. METHODS: We conducted surveys and focus group discussions of different health care providers involved in the management of VAP. The setting was medical-surgical ICUs at a tertiary academic hospital and a large multispecialty rural hospital in Wisconsin, USA. RESULTS: Overall, we found that 55 % of participants indicated that they were aware of the IDSA/ATS guideline. The top ranked barriers to VAP management included: 1) having multiple physician groups managing VAP, 2) variation in VAP management by differing ICU services, 3) physicians and level of training, and 4) renal failure complicating doses of antibiotics. Facilitators to VAP management included presence of multidisciplinary rounds that include nurses, pharmacist and respiratory therapists, and awareness of the IDSA/ATS guideline. This awareness was associated with receiving effective training on management of VAP, keeping up to date on nosocomial infection literature, and belief that performing a bronchoscopy to diagnose VAP would help with expeditious diagnosis of VAP. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from our study complement existing studies by identifying perceptions of the many different types of healthcare workers in ICU settings. These findings have implications for antibiotic stewardship teams, clinicians, and organizational leaders.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Wisconsin
19.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi ; 55(12): 950-952, 2016 Dec 01.
Artículo en Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27916051

RESUMEN

To study the value of lung ultrasound score (LUS) in assessing the clinical outcome of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia(VAP). A total of 99 VAP patients were enrolled in a prospective study. All patients met the diagnostic criterion of VAP based on the 2013 guidelines and admitted into our ICU from Jun 2013 to Jun 2015. All parameters were recorded on the diagnostic day (day 1) and day 5, including LUS, clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS), chest X ray (CXR), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ) score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA) score, etc. According to the CPIS, patients were divided into 2 groups(CPIS less than 6 and more or equal to 6). CPIS and LUS were similar on day 1 between two groups (P>0.05). However, on day 5, significant differences of CPIS and LUS were found between groups with CPIS<6 and CPIS≥6 (P=0.019 and P<0.001 respectively). LUS decreased on day 5 in CPIS<6 group and increased in CPIS≥6 group. In CPIS<6 group, there was a positive correlation between LUS and CPIS on day 1(r=0.375, P=0.003) and day 5 (r=0.590, P<0.001). CPIS≥6 groupshowed the same trend on day 1 (r=0.484, P=0.002) and day 5 (r=0.407, P=0.011). LUS can be used to dynamically evaluate the clinical outcome of VAP.


Asunto(s)
Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Ventiladores Mecánicos/efectos adversos , APACHE , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Ultrasonografía
20.
Harefuah ; 155(2): 105-9, 131, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Hebreo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27215123

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAPI is a common complication leading to lengthier hospitalizations and higher mortality. Prompt adequate initial antibiotic coverage is the crucial issue affecting survival. Currently, there is no gold standard diagnostic test. No conclusive data regarding the benefit of bronchoscopy exists in the literature reviewed. AIM: This study aims to evaluate the change of prognosis for patients who developed VAP, following a positive culture from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: General intensive care unit in a tertiary university healthcare center. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who were admitted to Surgical ICU and developed VAP and who then underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy with BAL between the period 01/02/2007 - 31/02/2011. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: A total of 66 patients who were admitted to the ICU, developed VAP and underwent bronchoscopy while ventilated; 30 patients were excluded. The positive BAL culture group was compared to the negative BAL culture group; there was no difference between demographic and clinical characteristics, mortality rates (for 30 days) or therapy change between the two groups. No complications were reported regarding the bronchoscopy procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that performing y a diagnostic bronchoscopy with BAL does not improve the prognosis of patients with VAP. Furthermore, expanded prospective studies will be needed to conclude regarding its benefit in diagnosis and subsequent rectifying of therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Broncoscopía/métodos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Lavado Broncoalveolar/métodos , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/microbiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Israel/epidemiología , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Selección de Paciente , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/mortalidad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA