Prevalence and healthcare burden of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis.

Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) is a rare syndrome of alveolar surfactant accumulation, resulting hypoxemic respiratory failure, and increased infection risk. Despite advances in our understanding of disease pathogenesis and the availability of improved diagnostics, the epidemiology and healthcare burden of PAP remain poorly defined. To determine the prevalence, and healthcare utilization and costs associated with PAP, we interrogated a large health insurance claims database containing comprehensive data for approximately 15 million patients in the United States. We also evaluated data from a referral-based diagnostic testing program collected over a 15-year period. The prevalence of PAP was determined to be 6.87 ± 0.33 per million in the general population, similar in males and females, and increased with age, however considering difficulties and delays in diagnosing this is likely a minimum estimate of true prevalence. PAP patients had significantly more comorbidities, health care utilization and associated costs compared to control patients precisely matched for age and gender. Between 2004 and 2018, 249 patients confirmed to have PAP were evaluated to identify the PAP-causing disease; 91.5% had autoimmune PAP, 3% had hereditary PAP caused by GM-CSF receptor mutations, 4% had secondary PAP, and 1.5% had congenital PAP. Considering the high diagnostic accuracy of serum GM-CSF autoantibody testing and predominance of autoimmune PAP, these results emphasize the importance of utilizing blood-based testing in PAP syndrome to identify the PAP-causing disease rather than invasive lung biopsies, resulting in earlier diagnosis, reduced morbidity and lower healthcare costs.

Childhood interstitial lung disease due to surfactant protein C deficiency: frequent use and costs of hospital services for a single case in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Rare chronic diseases of childhood are often complex and associated with multiple health issues. Such conditions present significant demands on health services, but the degree of these demands is seldom reported. This study details the utilisation of hospital services and associated costs in a single case of surfactant protein C deficiency, an example of childhood interstitial lung disease. METHODS: Hospital records and case notes for a single patient were reviewed. Costs associated with inpatient services were extracted from a paediatric hospital database. Actual costs were compared to cost estimates based on both disease/procedure-related cost averages for inpatient hospital episodes and a recently implemented Australian hospital funding algorithm (activity-based funding). RESULTS: To age 8 years and 10 months the child was a hospital inpatient for 443 days over 32 admissions. A total of 298 days were spent in paediatric intensive care. Investigations included 58 chest x-rays, 9 bronchoscopies, 10 lung function tests and 11 sleep studies. Comprehensive disease management failed to prevent respiratory decline and a lung transplant was required. Costs of inpatient care at three tertiary hospitals totalled $966,531 (Australian dollars). Disease- and procedure-related cost averages underestimated costs of paediatric inpatient services for this patient by 68%. An activity-based funding algorithm that is currently being adopted in Australia estimated the cost of hospital health service provision with more accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Health service usage and inpatient costs for this case of rare chronic childhood respiratory disease were substantial. This case study demonstrates that disease- and procedure-related cost averages are insufficient to estimate costs associated with rare chronic diseases that require complex management. This indicates that the health service use for similar episodes of hospital care is greater for children with rare diseases than other children. The impacts of rare chronic childhood diseases should be considered when planning resources for paediatric health services.