RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to uncover and catalog the various practices for delivering and disseminating clinical performance in various Veterans Affairs (VA) locations and to evaluate their quality against evidence-based models of effective feedback as reported in the literature. BACKGROUND: Feedback can enhance clinical performance in subsequent performance episodes. However, evidence is clear that the way in which feedback is delivered determines whether performance is harmed or improved. METHOD: We purposively sampled 16 geographically dispersed VA hospitals based on high, low, consistently moderate, and moderately average highly variable performance on a set of 17 outpatient clinical performance measures. We excluded four sites due to insufficient interview data. We interviewed four key personnel from each location (n = 48) to uncover effective and ineffective audit and feedback strategies. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed qualitatively using a framework-based content analysis approach to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: We identified 102 unique strategies used to deliver feedback. Of these strategies, 64 (62.74%) have been found to be ineffective according to the audit-and-feedback research literature. Comparing features common to effective (e.g., individually tailored, computerized feedback reports) versus ineffective (e.g., large staff meetings) strategies, most ineffective strategies delivered feedback in meetings, whereas strategies receiving the highest effectiveness scores delivered feedback via visually understood reports that did not occur in a group setting. CONCLUSIONS: Findings show that current practices are leveraging largely ineffective feedback strategies. Future research should seek to identify the longitudinal impact of current feedback and audit practices on clinical performance. APPLICATION: Feedback in primary care has little standardization and does not follow available evidence for effective feedback design. Future research in this area is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Auditoría Médica , Atención Primaria de Salud , Salud de los Veteranos , Retroalimentación , Humanos , Auditoría Médica/métodos , Auditoría Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración , Salud de los Veteranos/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adults with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring chronic dialysis continue to suffer from poor health outcomes and represent a population rightfully targeted for quality improvement. Electronic dashboards are increasingly used in healthcare to facilitate quality measurement and improvement. However, detailed descriptions of the creation of healthcare dashboards are uncommonly available and formal inquiry into perceptions, satisfaction, and utility by clinical users has been rarely conducted, particularly in the context of dialysis care. Therefore, we characterized the development, implementation and user experience with Veterans Health Administration (VHA) dialysis dashboard. METHODS: A clinical-quality dialysis dashboard was implemented, which displays clinical performance measures (CPMs) for Veterans with ESRD receiving chronic hemodialysis at all VHA facilities. Data on user experience and perceptions were collected via an e-mail questionnaire to dialysis medical directors and nurse managers at these facilities. RESULTS: Since 2016 the dialysis dashboard reports monthly on CPMs for approximately 3000 Veterans receiving chronic hemodialysis across 70 VHA dialysis facilities. Of 141 dialysis medical directors and nurse managers, 61 completed the questionnaire. Sixty-six percent of respondents did not find the dashboard difficult to access, 64% agreed that it is easy to use, 59% agreed that its layout is good, and the majority agreed that presentation of data is clear (54%), accurate (56%), and up-to-date (54%). Forty-eight percent of respondents indicated that it helped them improve patient care while 12% did not. Respondents indicated that they used the dialysis dashboard for clinical reporting (71%), quality assessment/performance improvement (QAPI) (62%), and decision-making (23%). CONCLUSIONS: Most users of the VHA dialysis dashboard found it accurate, up-to-date, easy to use, and helpful in improving patient care. It meets diverse user needs, including administrative reporting, clinical benchmarking and decision-making, and quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) activities. Moreover, the VHA dialysis dashboard affords national-, regional- and facility-level assessments of quality of care, guides and motivates best clinical practices, targets QAPI efforts, and informs and promotes population health management improvement efforts for Veterans receiving chronic hemodialysis.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Atención al Paciente/normas , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Salud de los Veteranos , Adulto , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información/normas , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Informática Médica/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Salud de los Veteranos/normas , Salud de los Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to understand the value and impact of the Veteran-Directed Home and Community Based Services program (VD-HCBS) on Veterans' lives in their own voices. Focus groups and individual interviews by telephone were conducted to elicit participant perspectives on what was most meaningful, and what difference VD-HCBS made in their lives. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis. The sample included 21 Veterans, with a mean age of 66±14, enrolled in VD-HCBS an average of 20.8 months. All were at risk of institutional placement based on their level of disability. Five major categories captured the information provided by participants: What a Difference Choice Makes; I'm a Person!; It's a Home-Saver; Coming Back to Life; and Keeping Me Healthy & Safe. Participants described the program as life changing. This study is the first time that Veterans themselves have identified the ways in which VD-HCBS impacted their lives, uncovering the mechanisms underlying positive outcomes. These categories revealed new ways of understanding VD-HCBS as an innovative approach to meeting the person-centered needs of Veterans wishing to remain at home, while experiencing quality care and leading meaningful lives, areas identified as priorities for improving long term services and supports.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Salud de los Veteranos/normas , Veteranos/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Just as the "New Deal" aimed to elevate the "forgotten man" of the Great Depression through governmental relief and reform, so does the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system aim to improve the health of veterans with the invisible illness of chronic kidney disease through a concerted series of health care delivery reforms. Augmenting its primary care platform with advances in informatics and health service delivery initiatives targeting kidney disease, the VA is changing how nephrology care is provided to veterans with the goal of optimized population kidney health. As the largest provider of kidney health services in the country, the VA offers an instructive case study of the value of comprehensive health care coverage for people with chronic kidney disease. Recent reports of kidney health outcomes among veterans support the benefit of the VA's integrated health care delivery system. Suggestions to optimize veterans' kidney health further may be equally applicable to other health systems caring for people afflicted with kidney disease.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/tendencias , Salud de los Veteranos/tendencias , Veteranos , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Atención a la Salud/normas , Humanos , Riñón/fisiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/normas , Salud de los Veteranos/normasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology, clinical features, outcomes, and predictors of mortality in veterans with peripheral artery disease (PAD). METHODS: We used national data from the Veterans Health Administration from fiscal years 2009 to 2011 to identify patients with a new diagnosis of PAD. Within this cohort, we describe characteristics of the patients, use of recommended medications, and clinical outcomes during a 3-year follow-up (fiscal year 2014). We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine predictors of mortality and adverse limb outcomes (amputation and hospitalization for critical limb ischemia [CLI]) during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 175,865 patients with a new diagnosis of PAD were included. The mean age was 69.9 years; 97.8% were male, and 67.7% were white. Nearly 77% of patients had hypertension, 46.5% had diabetes, 23% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 12.9% had renal failure. A prescription for statins was filled by 60.8%, and 34.9% received high-intensity statins within 90 days of PAD diagnosis. At 1 year, 2.6% underwent revascularization, 1.3% developed CLI, and 1.1% underwent amputation. During a median follow-up of 3.8 years, a total of 28.6% patients died (6.7% at 1 year), and 3.7% developed a limb outcome (2.0% at 1 year). Predictors of mortality included advanced age, comorbidities, and CLI or amputation at presentation. In contrast, prescription with statins was associated with lower mortality. Similar findings were present with regard to predictors of adverse limb outcomes, except that older age was associated with a lower risk of amputation or CLI. CONCLUSIONS: We found that veterans with PAD have a high prevalence of comorbid conditions and have a significant risk of mortality and limb loss. A substantial proportion of veterans with PAD are not prescribed recommended medications, especially statin therapy. Our data highlight important opportunities for improving care of veterans with PAD.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia/epidemiología , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Salud de los Veteranos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad Crítica , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Hospitalización , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/mortalidad , Isquemia/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Prevalencia , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Salud de los Veteranos/normasRESUMEN
Many best practices have been described for organizing a clinic to manage warfarin. Although these practices may have face validity, they may not be based on empirical analysis. Here, we describe our decade-long effort to apply the Structure-Process-Outcome model of quality measurement as a basis for measuring and improving outpatient warfarin management in the Veterans Health Administration. The purpose of the article is to raise awareness of this body of work with pharmacists who could potentially incorporate the findings of this work into their own practice settings. We conclude with concrete suggestions for immediate implementation in clinical settings.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud de los Veteranos/normas , Salud de los Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People with serious mental illness (SMI) die many years prematurely, with rates of premature mortality two to three times greater than the general population. Most premature deaths are due to "natural causes," especially cardiovascular disease and cancer. Often, people with SMI are not well engaged in primary care treatment and do not receive high-value preventative and medical services. There have been numerous efforts to improve this care, and few controlled trials, with inconsistent results. While people with SMI often do poorly with usual primary care arrangements, research suggests that integrated care and medical care management may improve treatment and outcomes, and reduce treatment costs. METHODS: This hybrid implementation-effectiveness study is a prospective, cluster controlled trial of a medical home, the SMI Patient-Aligned Care Team (SMI PACT), to improve the healthcare of patients with SMI enrolled with the Veterans Health Administration. The SMI PACT team includes proactive medical nurse care management, and integrated mental health treatment through regular psychiatry consultation and a collaborative care model. Patients are recruited to receive primary care through SMI PACT based on having a serious mental illness that is manageable with treatment, and elevated risk for hospitalization or death. In a site-level prospective controlled trial, this project studies the effect, relative to usual care, of SMI PACT on provision of appropriate preventive and medical treatments, health-related quality of life, satisfaction with care, and medical and mental health treatment utilization and costs. Research includes mixed-methods formative evaluation of usual care and SMI PACT implementation to strengthen the intervention and assess barriers and facilitators. Investigators examine relationships among organizational context, intervention factors, and patient and clinician outcomes, and identify patient factors related to successful patient outcomes. DISCUSSION: This will be one of the first controlled trials of the implementation and effectiveness of a patient centered medical home for people with serious mental illness. It will provide information regarding the value of this strategy, and processes and tools for implementing this model in community healthcare settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01668355 . Registered August 20, 2012.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Salud de los Veteranos/normas , Análisis por Conglomerados , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans AffairsRESUMEN
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its medical regulations by standardizing the delivery of care by VA health care providers through telehealth. This rule ensures that VA health care providers can offer the same level of care to all beneficiaries, irrespective of the State or location in a State of the VA health care provider or the beneficiary. This final rule achieves important Federal interests by increasing the availability of mental health, specialty, and general clinical care for all beneficiaries.
Asunto(s)
Habilitación Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Telemedicina/normas , Salud de los Veteranos/normas , Veteranos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Telemedicina/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos , Salud de los Veteranos/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
At a VA hospital, wait times for gastroenterology care have been in the order of 60 to 90 days for new clinic consults. Through a quality improvement process, these times were reduced to less than 30 days. With a revised triage process, the number of consults needing to be scheduled into the clinic was reduced 34%. In addition to achieving rapid clinical access, the weekly half-day clinic became less congested and more efficient. We describe this process of achieving improved access.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Gastroenterología/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Hospitales de Veteranos/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Salud de los Veteranos/normas , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Research using the Veterans Health Administration (VA) electronic medical records (EMR) has been limited by a lack of reliable smoking data. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of using VA EMR "Health Factors" data to determine smoking status among veterans with recent military service. DESIGN: Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC), and kappa statistics were used to evaluate concordance between VA EMR smoking status and criterion smoking status. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans (N = 2025) with service during the wars in Iraq/Afghanistan who participated in the VA Mid-Atlantic Post-Deployment Mental Health (PDMH) Study. MAIN MEASURES: Criterion smoking status was based on self-report during a confidential study visit. VA EMR smoking status was measured by coding health factors data entries (populated during automated clinical reminders) in three ways: based on the most common health factor, the most recent health factor, and the health factor within 12 months of the criterion smoking status data collection date. KEY RESULTS: Concordance with PDMH smoking status (current, former, never) was highest when determined by the most commonly observed VA EMR health factor (κ = 0.69) and was not significantly impacted by psychiatric status. Agreement was higher when smoking status was dichotomized: current vs. not current (κ = 0.73; sensitivity = 0.84; specificity = 0.91; AUC = 0.87); ever vs. never (κ = 0.75; sensitivity = 0.85; specificity = 0.90; AUC = 0.87). There were substantial missing Health Factors data when restricting analyses to a 12-month period from the criterion smoking status date. Current smokers had significantly more Health Factors entries compared to never or former smokers. CONCLUSIONS: The use of computerized tobacco screening data to determine smoking status is valid and feasible. Results indicating that smokers have significantly more health factors entries than non-smokers suggest that caution is warranted when using the EMR to select cases for cohort studies as the risk for selection bias appears high.
Asunto(s)
Campaña Afgana 2001- , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Fumar/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/normas , Salud de los Veteranos/normas , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumar/psicología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/psicología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud de los Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: For many diseases that place a large burden on our health care system, men often have worse health outcomes than women. As the largest single provider of health care to men in the USA, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has the potential to serve as leader in the delivery of improved men's health care to address these disparities. RECENT FINDINGS: The VA system has made recent strides in improving benefits for aspects of men's health that are traditionally poorly covered, such as treatment for male factor infertility. Despite this, review of Quality Enhancement Research Initiatives (QUERIs) within the VA system reveals few efforts to integrate disparate areas of care into a holistic men's health program. Policies to unify currently disparate aspects of men's health care will ensure that the VA remains a progressive model for other health care systems in the USA.
Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Servicios de Salud/normas , Salud del Hombre/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/normas , Salud de los Veteranos/normas , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/economía , Salud Holística/economía , Salud Holística/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Salud del Hombre/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/economía , Salud de los Veteranos/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical-performance measurement has helped improve the quality of health-care; yet success in attaining high levels of quality across multiple domains simultaneously still varies considerably. Although many sources of variability in care quality have been studied, the difficulty required to complete the clinical work itself has received little attention. OBJECTIVE: We present a task-based methodology for evaluating the difficulty of clinical-performance measures (CPMs) by assessing the complexity of their component requisite tasks. DESIGN: Using Functional Job Analysis (FJA), subject-matter experts (SMEs) generated task lists for 17 CPMs; task lists were rated on ten dimensions of complexity, and then aggregated into difficulty composites. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven outpatient work SMEs; 133 VA Medical Centers nationwide. MAIN MEASURES: Clinical Performance: 17 outpatient CPMs (2000-2008) at 133 VA Medical Centers nationwide. Measure Difficulty: for each CPM, the number of component requisite tasks and the average rating across ten FJA complexity scales for the set of tasks comprising the measure. KEY RESULTS: Measures varied considerably in the number of component tasks (M = 10.56, SD = 6.25, min = 5, max = 25). Measures of chronic care following acute myocardial infarction exhibited significantly higher measure difficulty ratings compared to diabetes or screening measures, but not to immunization measures ([Formula: see text] = 0.45, -0.04, -0.05, and -0.06 respectively; F (3, 186) = 3.57, p = 0.015). Measure difficulty ratings were not significantly correlated with the number of component tasks (r = -0.30, p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating the difficulty of achieving recommended CPM performance levels requires more than simply counting the tasks involved; using FJA to assess the complexity of CPMs' component tasks presents an alternate means of assessing the difficulty of primary-care CPMs and accounting for performance variation among measures and performers. This in turn could be used in designing performance reward programs, or to match workflow to clinician time and effort.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Competencia Clínica/normas , Hospitales de Veteranos/normas , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/normas , Salud de los Veteranos/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Increasingly, performance metrics are seen as key components for accurately measuring and improving health care value. Disappointment in the ability of chosen metrics to meet these goals is exemplified in a recent Institute of Medicine report that argues for a consensus-building process to determine a simplified set of reliable metrics. Overall health care goals should be defined and then metrics to measure these goals should be considered. If appropriate data for the identified goals are not available, they should be developed. We use examples from our work in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) on validating waiting time and mental health metrics to highlight other key issues for metric selection and implementation. First, we focus on the need for specification and predictive validation of metrics. Second, we discuss strategies to maintain the fidelity of the data used in performance metrics over time. These strategies include using appropriate incentives and data sources, using composite metrics, and ongoing monitoring. Finally, we discuss the VA's leadership in developing performance metrics through a planned upgrade in its electronic medical record system to collect more comprehensive VHA and non-VHA data, increasing the ability to comprehensively measure outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud de los Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/normas , Salud de los Veteranos/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Meaningful Use (MU) program has increased the national emphasis on electronic measurement of hospital quality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate stroke MU and one VHA stroke electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) in national VHA data and determine sources of error in using centralized electronic health record (EHR) data. DESIGN: Our study is a retrospective cross-sectional study of stroke quality measure eCQMs vs. chart review in a national EHR. We developed local SQL algorithms to generate the eCQMs, then modified them to run on VHA Central Data Warehouse (CDW) data. eCQM results were generated from CDW data in 2130 ischemic stroke admissions in 11 VHA hospitals. Local and CDW results were compared to chart review. MAIN MEASURES: We calculated the raw proportion of matching cases, sensitivity/specificity, and positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) for the numerators and denominators of each eCQM. To assess overall agreement for each eCQM, we calculated a weighted kappa and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa statistic for a three-level outcome: ineligible, eligible-passed, or eligible-failed. KEY RESULTS: In five eCQMs, the proportion of matched cases between CDW and chart ranged from 95.4 %-99.7 % (denominators) and 87.7 %-97.9 % (numerators). PPVs tended to be higher (range 96.8 %-100 % in CDW) with NPVs less stable and lower. Prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappas for overall agreement ranged from 0.73-0.95. Common errors included difficulty in identifying: (1) mechanical VTE prophylaxis devices, (2) hospice and other specific discharge disposition, and (3) contraindications to receiving care processes. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke MU indicators can be relatively accurately generated from existing EHR systems (nearly 90 % match to chart review), but accuracy decreases slightly in central compared to local data sources. To improve stroke MU measure accuracy, EHRs should include standardized data elements for devices, discharge disposition (including hospice and comfort care status), and recording contraindications.
Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Uso Significativo/normas , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/normas , Salud de los Veteranos/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although the clinical consequences of homelessness are well described, less is known about the role for health care systems in improving clinical and social outcomes for the homeless. We described the national implementation of a "homeless medical home" initiative in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and correlated patient health outcomes with characteristics of high-performing sites. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 33 VHA facilities with homeless medical homes and patient- aligned care teams that served more than 14,000 patients. We correlated site-specific health care performance data for the 3,543 homeless veterans enrolled in the program from October 2013 through March 2014, including those receiving ambulatory or acute health care services during the 6 months prior to enrollment in our study and 6 months post-enrollment with corresponding survey data on the Homeless Patient Aligned Care Team (H-PACT) program implementation. We defined high performance as high rates of ambulatory care and reduced use of acute care services. RESULTS: More than 96% of VHA patients enrolled in these programs were concurrently receiving VHA homeless services. Of the 33 sites studied, 82% provided hygiene care (on-site showers, hygiene kits, and laundry), 76% provided transportation, and 55% had an on-site clothes pantry; 42% had a food pantry and provided on-site meals or other food assistance. Six-month patterns of acute-care use pre-enrollment and post-enrollment for 3,543 consecutively enrolled patients showed a 19.0% reduction in emergency department use and a 34.7% reduction in hospitalizations. Three features were significantly associated with high performance: 1) higher staffing ratios than other sites, 1) integration of social supports and social services into clinical care, and 3) outreach to and integration with community agencies. CONCLUSION: Integrating social determinants of health into clinical care can be effective for high-risk homeless veterans.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración , Salud de los Veteranos/normas , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Poblaciones VulnerablesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of pharmacist screening for osteoporosis risk with increased bone mineral density (BMD) testing. DESIGN: Prospective, quasi-experiment. SETTING: Veterans Affairs medical center Community Living Centers (CLC), home-based primary care, and outpatient geriatric clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a routine pharmacist interaction were included. Exclusion criteria included hospice, dialysis, and respite care. INTERVENTIONS: Risk assessment with recommendations communicated by progress notes to consider BMD testing or interventions in the settings described. A second phase of the project was conducted in CLC patients to evaluate the effect of an interdisciplinary team with the inclusion of a physician to assess clinical appropriateness of interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Proportion of patients meeting guidelines for BMD testing and change in proportion of patients with BMD testing ordered after intervention. Secondary measures included response to recommendations and initiation of osteoporosis pharmacotherapies. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients were included in the first phase of the project, with 120 (54.8%) identified as candidates for BMD testing with recommendations documented. Of this population, 5 patients without previous dual-energy absorptiometry results had BMD testing ordered (P = 0.6). In the second phase, 22 high-risk patients in the CLC met criteria for BMD testing, with 14 determined to have reasons for not pursuing BMD testing. CONCLUSION: Most patients in the settings described met guidelines for BMD testing. Pharmacist recommendations to consider BMD testing did not increase the rate of testing. Including a physician on an interdisciplinary team appeared to help determine appropriateness and improve the rate of testing, though the increase in testing was not statistically significant.
Asunto(s)
Absorciometría de Fotón , Densidad Ósea , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Atención a la Salud , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Farmacéuticos , Salud de los Veteranos , Absorciometría de Fotón/normas , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/normas , Atención a la Salud/normas , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/fisiopatología , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Farmacéuticos/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Rol Profesional , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Salud de los Veteranos/normasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In 2012, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented guidelines seeking to reduce PSA-based screening for prostate cancer in men aged 75 years and older. OBJECTIVES: To reduce the use of inappropriate PSA-based prostate cancer screening among men aged 75 and over. SETTING: The Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (VA GLA) PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: We developed a highly specific computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) alert to remind providers, at the moment of PSA screening order entry, of the current guidelines and institutional policy. We implemented the tool in a prospective interrupted time series study design over 15 months, and compared the trends in monthly PSA screening rate at baseline to the CCDS on and off periods of the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 30,150 men were at risk, or eligible, for screening, and 2,001 men were screened. The mean monthly screening rate during the 15-month baseline period was 8.3%, and during the 15-month intervention period, was 4.6%. The screening rate declined by 38% during the baseline period and by 40% and 30%, respectively, during the two periods when the CCDS tool was turned on. The screening rate ratios for the baseline and two periods when the CCDS tool was on were 0.97, 0.78, and 0.90, respectively, with a significant difference between baseline and the first CCDS-on period (p < 0.0001), and a trend toward a difference between baseline and the second CCDS-on period (p = 0.056). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a highly specific CCDS tool alone significantly reduced inappropriate PSA screening in men aged 75 years and older in a reproducible fashion. With this simple intervention, evidence-based guidelines were brought to bear at the point of care, precisely for the patients and providers for whom they were most helpful, resulting in more appropriate use of medical resources.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , Procedimientos Innecesarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Salud de los Veteranos/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Population-based alcohol screening is recommended in primary care, and increasingly incentivized by policies, yet is challenging to implement. The U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VA) achieved high rates of screening using a national performance measure and associated electronic clinical reminder to prompt and facilitate screening and document results. However, the sensitivity of alcohol screening for identifying unhealthy alcohol use is low in VA clinics. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to understand factors that might contribute to low sensitivity of alcohol screening. DESIGN: This was an observational, qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included clinical staff responsible for conducting alcohol screening and nine independently managed primary care clinics of a single VA medical center in the Northwestern U.S. APPROACH: Four researchers observed clinical staff as they conducted alcohol screening. Observers took handwritten notes, which were transcribed and coded iteratively. Template analysis identified a priori and emergent themes. KEY RESULTS: We observed 72 instances of alcohol screening conducted by 31 participating staff. Observations confirmed known challenges to implementation of care using clinical reminders, including workflow and flexibility limitations. Three themes specific to alcohol screening emerged. First, most observed screening was conducted verbally, guided by the clinical reminder, although some variability in approaches to screening (e.g., paper-based or laminate-based screening) was observed. Second, specific verbal screening practices that might contribute to low sensitivity of clinical screening were identified, including conducting non-verbatim screening and making inferences, assumptions, and/or suggestions to input responses. Third, staff introduced and adapted screening questions to enhance patient comfort. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative study in nine clinics found that implementation of alcohol screening facilitated by a clinical reminder resulted primarily in verbal screening in which questions were not asked vertbatim and were otherwise adapted. Non-verbal approaches to screening, or patient self-administration, may enhance validity and standardization of screening while simultaneously addressing limitations of the clinical reminder and issues related to perceived discomfort.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Sistemas Recordatorios , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias/métodos , Técnicos Medios en Salud , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Humanos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Investigación Cualitativa , Veteranos/psicología , Salud de los Veteranos/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Poor communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists is a significant problem and a detriment to effective care coordination. Inconsistency in the quality of primary-specialty communication persists even in environments with integrated delivery systems and electronic medical records (EMRs), such as the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure ease of communication and to characterize communication challenges perceived by PCPs and primary care personnel in the VHA, with a particular focus on challenges associated with referral communication. DESIGN: The study utilized a convergent mixed-methods design: online cross-sectional survey measuring PCP-reported ease of communication with specialists, and semi-structured interviews characterizing primary-specialty communication challenges. PARTICIPANTS: 191 VHA PCPs from one regional network were surveyed (54% response rate), and 41 VHA PCPs and primary care staff were interviewed. MAIN MEASURES/APPROACH: PCP-reported ease of communication mean score (survey) and recurring themes in participant descriptions of primary-specialty referral communication (interviews) were analyzed. KEY RESULTS: Among PCPs, ease-of-communication ratings were highest for women's health and mental health (mean score of 2.3 on a scale of 1-3 in both), and lowest for cardiothoracic surgery and neurology (mean scores of 1.3 and 1.6, respectively). Primary care personnel experienced challenges communicating with specialists via the EMR system, including difficulty in communicating special requests for appointments within a certain time frame and frequent rejection of referral requests due to rigid informational requirements. When faced with these challenges, PCPs reported using strategies such as telephone and e-mail contact with specialists with whom they had established relationships, as well as the use of an EMR-based referral innovation called "eConsults" as an alternative to a traditional referral. CONCLUSIONS: Primary-specialty communication is a continuing challenge that varies by specialty and may be associated with the likelihood of an established connection already in place between specialty and primary care. Improvement in EMR systems is needed, with more flexibility for the communication of special requests. Building relationships between PCPs and specialists may also facilitate referral communication.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales de Veteranos/normas , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Medicina/normas , Médicos de Atención Primaria/normas , Derivación y Consulta/normas , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/normas , Comunicación , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Medicina/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Estados Unidos , Salud de los Veteranos/normasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Half of all Veterans experience chronic pain yet many face geographical barriers to specialty pain care. In 2011, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) launched the Specialty Care Access Network-ECHO (SCAN-ECHO), which uses telehealth technology to provide primary care providers with case-based specialist consultation and pain management education. Our objective was to evaluate the pilot SCAN-ECHO pain management program (SCAN-ECHO-PM). DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a longitudinal observational evaluation of SCAN-ECHO-PM in seven regional VHA healthcare networks. METHODS: We identified the patient panels of primary care providers who submitted a consultation to one or more SCAN-ECHO-PM sessions. We constructed multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association between provider SCAN-ECHO-PM consultation and 1) delivery of outpatient care (physical medicine, mental health, substance use disorder, and pain medicine) and 2) medication initiation (antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and opioid analgesics). RESULTS: Primary care providers (N = 159) who presented one or more SCAN-ECHO-PM sessions had patient panels of 22,454 patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). Provider consultation to SCAN-ECHO-PM was associated with utilization of physical medicine [hazard ratio (HR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.14] but not mental health (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.05), substance use disorder (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84-1.03) or specialty pain clinics (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.94-1.08). SCAN-ECHO-PM consultation was associated with initiation of an antidepressant (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.15) or anticonvulsant medication (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.19) but not an opioid analgesic (HR 1.05, 0.99-1.10). CONCLUSIONS: SCAN-ECHO-PM was associated with increased utilization of physical medicine services and initiation of nonopioid medications among patients with CNCP. SCAN-ECHO-PM may provide a novel means of building pain management competency among primary care providers.