Comparative Analysis of Intramedullary Nail versus Plate Fixation for Fibula Fracture in Supination External Rotation Type IV Ankle Injury.

BACKGROUND Lateral malleolus fractures, typically from trauma, sports, or accidents, are common, with supination external rotation (SER) injuries being most prevalent. SER injuries involve complex joint mechanics and often necessitate surgical intervention for instability. This study compares intramedullary nail and plate fixation for fibula fractures in SER type IV ankle injuries, considering their biomechanical properties and influence on fracture healing. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective, randomized study was conducted between January 2021 and December 2021. A total of 81 patients with SER injuries were included in the study. Surgical procedures were performed using either intramedullary nails or plates. The following parameters were recorded and analyzed: postoperative complications, operation times, bone healing times, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, and ankle range of motion. RESULTS Out of the 81 cases, 42 were treated with intramedullary nails, while 39 received plate fixation. Statistical analysis revealed a significantly lower rate of postoperative complications in the intramedullary nail group than in the the plate fixation group (9.52% vs 30.77%, P<0.0164). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of operation time, bone healing time, AOFAS scores, VAS scores, and functional evaluations (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Plate fixation and intramedullary nail fixation are effective techniques for treating fibula fractures in SER type IV injuries. However, intramedullary nail fixation demonstrates a lower rate of complications. Therefore, intramedullary nails may be preferable to plate fixation for the management of fibula fractures in SER type IV ankle injuries.

Effects of simulated radioulnar synostosis on supination and pronation in cats. A cadaveric study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of an induced synostosis with a screw on pronation and supination in cats. STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo biomechanical study. SAMPLE POPULATION: A total of 58 feline forelimbs. METHODS: A total of 58 cadaveric feline thoracic limbs were mounted on a custom-built jig with the elbow and carpus flexed at a 90° angle. To exclude any orthopedic disease, radiographs of the forelimbs were performed prior to the mechanical tests. Radioulnar synostosis was imitated with a 2 mm cortical screw through the radius into the ulna in the proximal (Group P; n = 54), middle (Group M; n = 52), and distal (Group D; n = 53) radial diaphysis. The angles of pronation and supination were recorded after manually applying a two-finger tight rotational force to the metacarpus. Rotational tests were performed without a screw (Group N) and with a screw in each of the aforementioned positions. Pairwise comparisons between the groups were performed based on their angles of rotation with a paired t-test with the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure and a mixed model ANOVA. RESULTS: Mean angles of rotation decreased between Group N (129.5 ± 15.9°) and all groups with imitated radioulnar synostosis to a mean angle of 37.5 ± 14.5° (p < .0001). Mean angles of rotation did not differ between the groups with imitated radioulnar synostosis. CONCLUSION: Induced radioulnar synostosis decreases antebrachial rotation by more than two-thirds, regardless of location. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Implants fixating the radius to the ulna should be avoided in cats, regardless where they are located along the radial diaphysis.

Analyzing the reduction quality of the distal radioulnar joint after closed K-wire transfixation in a cadaver model: is supination or neutral position superior?

INTRODUCTION: Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instabilities are challenging and their optimal treatment is controversial. In special cases or when reconstruction of the stabilizing triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) fails, K-wire transfixation can be performed. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the rotational position of the forearm in which this should be done. Therefore, it was investigated whether anatomical reduction would best be achieved by transfixation in neutral position or supination of the forearm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve cadaveric upper limbs were examined before dissection of the DRUJ stabilizing ligaments and after closed transfixation in both positions by C-arm cone-beam CT. Whether this was first done in neutral position or in supination was randomized. The change in the radioulnar ratio (RR) in percentage points (%points) was analyzed using Student's t-test. RR was used since it is a common and sensitive method to evaluate DRUJ reduction, expressing the ulnar head's position in the sigmoid notch as a length ratio. RESULTS: The analysis showed an increased change in RR in neutral position with 5.4 ± 9.7%points compared to fixation in supination with 0.2 ± 16.1%points, yet this was not statistically significant (p = 0.404). CONCLUSIONS: Neither position leads to a superior reduction in general. However, the result was slightly closer to the anatomical position in supination. Thus, transfixation of the DRUJ should be performed in the position in which reduction could best be achieved and based on these data, that tends to be in supination. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings and to identify influential factors.

Does a rupture of the lateral ankle ligament need to be repaired in supination-adduction type II (OTA/AO 44A2) fractures?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of patients with supination-adduction (SAD) type II (OTA/AO 44A2) fractures who had a lateral ankle ligament rupture repaired compared with patients who did not have a lateral ankle ligament repaired using patients who underwent fibula fracture fixation as a control group. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all 104 patients diagnosed with SAD type II fractures from January 2011 to December 2020 and managed operatively was performed. The patients were divided into three groups: 32 patients with ruptures of the lateral ligaments that were not repaired (group A), 34 patients with ruptures of the lateral ligaments that were repaired (group B), and 38 patients with fibula fracture fixation acting as the control group (group C). The objective outcomes including radiographic findings, the ankle range of motion, the manual ankle stress tests, and complications were gained from the record of the last time in outpatient clinics. The functional outcomes including the identification of functional ankle instability (IdFAI) scores were collected postoperatively at 12-month intervals to assess clinical outcomes. The Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and Karlsson scoring scale were also recorded at the last follow-up. RESULTS: The mean follow-up of the objective and subjective functional outcomes was 23.4 (range, 13-42) and 76.9 (range, 25-134) months, respectively. There was no significant difference in the radiographic findings, the ankle range of motion and complications between the three groups. All ankles were found to be stable using the manual ankle stress test in both group A and group B. The IdFAI scores showed a significant difference between group A and group B (1.12 ± 1.3 vs 0.35 ± 0.69; p < 0.001) in the first year of follow-up and no significant difference after the first year. No differences were noted in MOXFQ scores or Karlsson scores among the groups. CONCLUSION: Directly repairing the lateral ligament could minimize the proportion of the first year of postoperative functional ankle instability, although the final stability of the ankle and clinical outcomes were not significantly different in SAD type II fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Neuromechanical Differences between Pronated and Supinated Forearm Positions during Upper-Body Wingate Tests.

Arm-cycling is a versatile exercise modality with applications in both athletic enhancement and rehabilitation, yet the influence of forearm orientation remains understudied. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the impact of forearm position on upper-body arm-cycling Wingate tests. Fourteen adult males (27.3 ± 5.8 years) underwent bilateral assessments of handgrip strength in standing and seated positions, followed by pronated and supinated forward arm-cycling Wingate tests. Electromyography (EMG) was recorded from five upper-extremity muscles, including anterior deltoid, triceps brachii lateral head, biceps brachii, latissimus dorsi, and brachioradialis. Simultaneously, bilateral normal and propulsion forces were measured at the pedal-crank interface. Rate of perceived exertion (RPE), power output, and fatigue index were recorded post-test. The results showed that a pronated forearm position provided significantly (p < 0.05) higher normal and propulsion forces and triceps brachii muscle activation patterns during arm-cycling. No significant difference in RPE was observed between forearm positions (p = 0.17). A positive correlation was found between seated handgrip strength and peak power output during the Wingate test while pronated (dominant: p = 0.01, r = 0.55; non-dominant: p = 0.03, r = 0.49) and supinated (dominant: p = 0.03, r = 0.51; don-dominant: p = 0.04, r = 0.47). Fatigue changed the force and EMG profile during the Wingate test. In conclusion, this study enhances our understanding of forearm position's impact on upper-body Wingate tests. These findings have implications for optimizing training and performance strategies in individuals using arm-cycling for athletic enhancement and rehabilitation.

Covariation between wrist bone morphology and maximal range of motion during ulnar deviation and supination in extant nonhuman primate taxa.

This study investigates the maximal range of motion (ROM) during wrist deviation and forearm rotation for five different primate genera and the possible correlation with the shape of the distal ulna, triquetrum and hamate. A two-block phylogenetic partial least square analysis was performed to test this covariation in a phylogenetic context, using shape coordinates and a matrix of maximal ROM data as input data. The results show that gibbons have the highest ROM for both ulnar deviation and supination, whereas Macaca exhibited the lowest ROM for supination, and Pan had the lowest ROM for ulnar deviation. These results can be attributed to differences in locomotor behaviour, as gibbons need a large wrist mobility in all directions for their highly arboreal lifestyle, whereas Macaca and Pan need a stable wrist during terrestrial locomotion. However, we found no correlation between distal ulna/triquetrum/hamate shape and maximal ROM during ulnar deviation and supination in the different primate taxa. A larger dataset, in combination with behavioural and biomechanical studies, is needed to establish form-function relationships of the primate hand, which will aid the functional interpretation of primate fossil remains.

Deep branch of the radial nerve: effect of pronation/supination on longitudinal nerve alignment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of maximal pronation and supination of the forearm on the alignment and anatomic relationship of the deep branch of the radial nerve (DBRN) at the superior arcade of the supinator muscle (SASM) by using high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, HRUS in the long axis of the DBRN was performed in asymptomatic participants enrolled from March to August 2021. DBRN alignment was evaluated by measuring angles of the nerve in maximal pronation and maximal supination of the forearm independently by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Forearm range of motion and biometric measurements were recorded. Student t, Shapiro-Wilk, Pearson correlation, reliability analyses, and Kruskal-Wallis test were used. RESULTS: The study population included 110 nerves from 55 asymptomatic participants (median age, 37.0 years; age range, 16-63 years; 29 [52.7%] women). There was a statistically significant difference between the DBRN angle in maximal supination and maximal pronation (Reader 1: 95% CI: 5.74, 8.21, p < 0.001, and Reader 2: 95% CI: 5.82, 8.37, p < 0.001). The mean difference between the angles in maximal supination and maximal pronation was approximately 7° for both readers. ICC was very good for intraobserver agreement (Reader1: r ≥ 0.92, p < 0.001; Reader 2: r ≥ 0.93, p < 0.001), as well as for interobserver agreement (phase 1: r ≥ 0.87, p < 0.001; phase 2: r ≥ 0.90, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The extremes of the rotational movement of the forearm affect the longitudinal morphology and anatomic relationships of the DBRN, primarily demonstrating the convergence of the nerve towards the SASM in maximal pronation and divergence in maximal supination.

Long-Term Outcomes of Biceps Rerouting for Flexible Supination Contractures in Children With Brachial Plexus Birth Injuries.

PURPOSE: Forearm supination contractures occur in 7% of children with brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI). Biceps rerouting is proposed when pronation has deteriorated but is passively correctable to at least 0° (neutral). The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate long-term outcomes of biceps rerouting for this indication, including magnitude and maintenance of correction, complications, and subsequent osteotomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all children with BPBI and forearm supination contractures treated with biceps rerouting alone, for the above indications, from 1993 to 2017 with at least 2 years follow-up. Demographic information, BPBI characteristics, surgical details, and ranges of motion were obtained from medical records. Pre- and postoperative active pronation (AP) and supination (AS), elbow flexion contracture, and arc of forearm rotation (Arc) were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: Twenty-five children (13 females; 13 left forearms; 15 global BPBI) underwent biceps rerouting at age 7 ± 3 years and were followed for 6 ± 3 years. Before surgery, the mean AP and AS were 6° ± 29° and 62° ± 27°, respectively. At the final follow-up, the mean AP, AS, and Arc were 39° ± 36°, 18° ± 34°, and 57° ± 42°, respectively. AP was significantly improved and AS was significantly decreased by 2 years after surgery and at the final follow-up. Neither Arc nor elbow flexion contracture changed significantly. Two of 25 (8%) children underwent subsequent forearm osteotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Biceps rerouting in children with BPBI improves the forearm position when pronation is deteriorating by shifting the arc from supination to pronation without decreasing the arc of motion or worsening elbow flexion contractures. There is a low risk of complications and a limited need for subsequent forearm osteotomy. These results are maintained over time. When performed before passive pronation is reduced beyond neutral, this procedure may prevent severe supination contractures and reduce the need for forearm osteotomy. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Preoperative radius head dislocation affects forearm rotation after mobilization of congenital radioulnar synostosis.

BACKGROUND: The present study was carried out to answer three questions: 1) How much forearm rotation can be expected after mobilization of congenital radioulnar synostosis (CRUS)? 2) Does preoperative radius head dislocation affect forearm rotation after mobilization? 3) What factors other than radius head dislocation affect postoperative forearm rotation? METHODS: We performed mobilization of CRUS with a free vascularized fascio-fat graft and a radius osteotomy (Kanaya's procedure) on 26 forearms of 25 patients. The age at the surgery ranged from 5.3 to 13.4 years. The follow-up duration ranged 24-111 months. We classified CRUS into 3 groups according to the dislocation of the radius head: posterior dislocation (N = 13), anterior dislocation (N = 9) and no dislocation (N = 4). Since major complaints of patients and parents were poor forearm rotation and lack of supination, they were evaluated separately. RESULTS: Mean preoperative forearm ankylosis angle was 34.8° (range; neutral to 90° pronation). Preoperative pronation ankylosis angle was higher in the posterior dislocation group (mean 55.3°) than the anterior dislocation (mean 11.6°) and no dislocation groups (mean 5.0°). There was no re-ankylosis after mobilization and the mean postoperative active range of motion (ROM) was 86.5°. The mean active ROM was 75.7° in the posterior dislocation group, 96.1° in anterior dislocation group and 100.0° in no dislocation group. The mean active supination was 6.9, 33.9 and 47.5° respectively. The posterior dislocation group showed less ROM and less supination than other groups. Preoperative pronation ankylosis angle showed negative correlation with postoperative ROM (ρ = - 0.59) and postoperative supination (ρ = - 0.73). CONCLUSION: The mean postoperative active ROM of this mobilization was 86.5°. Posterior dislocation group showed higher pronation ankylosis angle preoperatively, and less postoperative ROM and less supination than anterior and no dislocation groups. Preoperative pronation ankylosis angle showed negative correlation with postoperative ROM and supination.

Surgical approach to forearm pronation deformity in patients with cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

Background: Pronation deformity in patients with cerebral palsy can have a major impact on upper limb functionality. There is lack of consensus in the literature about the preferred surgical technique to address this deformity. Study aim: To evaluate and synthesize the outcome of different surgical techniques for pronation deformity in patients with cerebral palsy. Methodology: The databases MEDLINE and Embase were searched for publications up to December 2021. Articles were considered eligible for inclusion when the included patients had a pronation deformity caused by cerebral palsy and results of surgical intervention for pronation deformity were examined. Evaluation of the quality of the retrieved study was conducted using the MINORS tool. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of interventions and reported outcomes. Results: Nineteen studies, involving 475 patients and eight different techniques were included. All studies reported gain of active supination in most patients. The effect of surgery on functional gain was less clear and there was a large heterogeneity of reported functional outcome measures. There were 46 reported complications. Overall quality of study design was poor, illustrated by the average MINOR score of 6.9/16. Overall, there is a high risk of bias due to poor internal and external validity of the studies. Conclusion: Despite positive reports on gain in supination and functionality after most procedures addressing pronation deformity in CP patients, no conclusions can be drawn concerning the preferred technique due to the low quality of the evidence.

Role of the supinator muscle in the pathophysiological mechanism of a pulled elbow.

A pulled elbow is a common childhood orthopaedic injury that is usually caused by longitudinal traction on the hand. The pathophysiological mechanism of a pulled elbow involves interposition of the annular ligament into the radiohumeral joint. Recent ultrasonographic studies have shown that both the supinator muscle and annular ligament were trapped into the radiohumeral joint. This paper discusses why pulled elbows can occur during pronation and how a pulled elbow can be reduced either by hyperpronation or supination followed by elbow flexion based on the function of the supinator muscle.

Compensating for Soft-Tissue Artifact Using the Orientation of Distal Limb Segments During Electromagnetic Motion Capture of the Upper Limb.

Most motion capture measurements suffer from soft-tissue artifacts (STA). Especially affected are rotations about the long axis of a limb segment, such as humeral internal-external rotation (HIER) and forearm pronation-supination (FPS). Unfortunately, most existing methods to compensate for STA were designed for optoelectronic motion capture systems. We present and evaluate an STA compensation method that (1) compensates for STA in HIER and/or FPS, (2) is developed specifically for electromagnetic motion capture systems, and (3) does not require additional calibration or data. To compensate for STA, calculation of HIER angles relies on forearm orientation, and calculation of FPS angles rely on hand orientation. To test this approach, we recorded whole-arm movement data from eight subjects and compared their joint angle trajectories calculated according to progressive levels of STA compensation. Compensated HIER and FPS angles were significantly larger than uncompensated angles. Although the effect of STA compensation on other joint angles (besides HIER and FPS) was usually modest, significant effects were seen in certain degrees-of-freedom under some conditions. Overall, the method functioned as intended during most of the range of motion of the upper limb, but it becomes unstable in extreme elbow extension and extreme wrist flexion-extension. Specifically, this method is not recommended for movements within 20 deg of full elbow extension, full wrist flexion, or full wrist extension. Since this method does not require additional calibration of data, it can be applied retroactively to data collected without the intent to compensate for STA.

Effects of Kinesio taping on forearm supination/pronation performance fatigability.

BACKGROUND: Repetitive exertion in supination/pronation could increase the risk of forearm diseases due to fatigue. Kinesio taping (KT) is a physical therapy technique that decreases muscle tone and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) risk. Many assumptions about taping have been made and several studies have considered the taping applications; however, the effect of KT on strength and fatigue of the forearm supination/pronation remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of KT on forearm performance fatigability. METHODS: A screwing test was constructed to measure the forearm force loss and screwing efficiency during repetitive supination/pronation. Data from 18 healthy adults who underwent both KT and no taping (NT) sessions were used to investigate the forearm strength change in terms of grip force (GF), driving torque (DT), and push force (PF). The maximal isometric forces before and after the screwing test and force decreasing rate (efficiency) during screwing were evaluated to assess the performance fatigability in KT and NT conditions. RESULTS: A statistically significant force loss (FL) in maximal isometric GF (p = 0.039) and maximal isometric DT (p = 0.044); however, no significant difference was observed in maximal isometric PF (p = 0.426) between NT and KT. KT provides greater screwing efficiency than NT. CONCLUSIONS: KT could not improve FL in the maximal muscle strength of the forearm in healthy subjects. KT on the forearm was associated with a lesser decline in DT efficiency than NT, implying that KT could decrease the loss rate of muscle strength and delay the development of fatigue; however, the KT did not yield improvements in PF while performing screwing tasks.

Clinical and psychosocial outcomes following correction of supination deformity in obstetrical brachial plexus palsy patients: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Forearm supination contracture is the mostAQ common deformity of the forearm following obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP). Supination deformities in OBPP may be corrected by performing forearm osteotomy; however, the high recurrence rate limits patient satisfaction. Apart from the cosmetic impairment of this deformity, there are no previous reports on the clinical and psychosocial outcomes of forearm osteotomy in patients with supination deformities secondary to OBPP. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the clinical, functional, and psychosocial outcomes following forearm pronation osteotomy in OBPP patients with supination deformity. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted after a chart review of all OBPP sequelae with supination forearm deformity in patients who underwent forearm pronating osteotomy from 2006 to 2018. Data relating to OBPP were gathered, and functional and psychosocial outcomes were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire through interviews RESULTS: This study included 60 patients with a mean age of 8.7 years at the time of surgery. A total of 46 patients had lesions involving C5-T1 (76.7%). The mean preoperative supination deformity position was 68.5°, the mean amount of correction was 98.9°, and the mean forearm position was 30.5°, postoperatively. In the DASH assessment scale used postoperatively, 24 patients (42.9%) reported no restrictions on their daily activities, 25 patients (44.6%) believed that their social activities were unaffected, and 20 patients (35.7%) strongly disagreed with feeling less capable or less confident due to arm, shoulder, or hand problems. The factors significantly affecting position at the final follow-up were the amount of correction (p = 0.011), postoperative position (p = 0.005), and degree of pronation achieved (p = 0.02). The amount of correction significantly affected both self-confidence (p = 0.049) and activities of daily living (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study showed that the position at the final follow-up, the degree of pronation achieved intraoperatively, and the postoperative position significantly affected the position at follow-up and the outcome assessment. The amount of intraoperative correction was significantly associated with higher self-confidence and normal activities of daily living.

The Effect of Forearm Shortening on Forearm Range of Motion.

PURPOSE: Osseous shortening of the forearm is performed during forearm replantation; however, no large clinical reviews have discussed its effects on patient outcomes. A recent cadaver study demonstrated the progressive loss of forearm pronation/supination ranges of motion with increased shortening lengths using external fixation. Our study aimed to quantify the effects of shortening on passive forearm motion using internal fixation after 2, 4, and 6 cm of mid-forearm shortening. METHODS: A volar Henry approach and direct approach to the ulna were used on 8 cadaveric specimens. The forearms were sequentially shortened by 2, 4, and 6 cm. Fixation was performed on the volar surfaces of the radius and ulna. Pronation and supination of the forearms were tested by applying 1 Nm of torque at baseline and after the fixation of both the radius and ulna using osteotomy. Radiographs and measurements were obtained at each phase to determine the maximum radial bow and radioulnar gap. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: Greater shortening of the radius and ulna led to progressively greater reductions in both pronation and supination range of motion. Larger differences were seen in supination at 2-4 cm of shortening and in pronation at 4-6 cm of shortening. Changes in supination were found to be associated with the radial bow and radioulnar gap; changes in pronation were found to be associated with the radial bow and radial bow's location. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that quantifiable effects on passive forearm motion occur after osseous shortening of the forearm. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This information may improve surgeons' and patients' understanding of the changes in forearm motion expected after shortening in the setting of replantation or tumor resection or in the setting of limb salvage of a mangled extremity.

The One-Bone Forearm in Children: Surgical Technique and a Retrospective Review of Outcomes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe a technique of end-to-end rigid fixation of the distal radius to the proximal ulna. The shortening and radioulnar overlap in this technique yield a high union rate, large corrections, and few complications. METHODS: This retrospective chart review from 2 centers was undertaken in 39 patients (40 forearms) who underwent one-bone forearm operations between 2005 and 2019. There were 25 male and 14 female patients, with a mean age at surgery of 9.7 years (range 3 to 19 years; SD, 4.5 years). The diagnoses included brachial plexus birth injury, spinal cord injury, arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, cerebral palsy, ulnar deficiency with focal indentation, multiple hereditary exostosis, acute flaccid myelitis, and tumor. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 33.5 months (1.2-110.1 months; SD, 27.1 months). The 36 forearms in supination had an average supination contracture of 93° (range, 15° to 120°; SD, 15.4°). The 4 pronated arms had an average pronation contracture of 80° (range, 50° to 120°; SD, 29.2°). The average postoperative position was 22.8° of pronation (range, -15° to 45°; SD, 12.9°). The average correction obtained with our technique was 113° (range, 20° to 145°; SD, 22.9°). Radiographic union was demonstrated in 32 (80%) of the one-bone forearms by 10 weeks, 39 (97.5%) by 16 weeks, and 40 (100%) by 24 weeks. One patient had peri-implant fractures prior to union. No forearms required reoperation for nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: One-bone forearm performed with this technique allows reliable healing and a large degree of correction. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Bilateral Ulnar Deviation Supination Stress Test to Assess Dynamic Scapholunate Instability.

PURPOSE: We describe a new radiologic test to assess the integrity of the scapholunate ligament in dynamic scapholunate dysfunction. METHODS: A bilateral forearm-holding device was designed to perform a comparative radiographic assessment of the scapholunate joint gap during resisted isometric contraction of the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle with full supination of the forearm. The concept is based on the known scaphoid pronation effect of this muscle. Clinical data from 12 patients were collected retrospectively and used to analyze the patients' symptomatic and asymptomatic (contralateral) wrists with a newly developed test called the Bilateral Ulnar Deviation Supination (BUDS) test. A wrist arthroscopy was performed in all cases as a reference standard for the radiologic test. RESULTS: The test was positive in 7 patients, with a mean scapholunate joint gap of 4.8 mm. The mean differences in the scapholunate joint gaps between both wrists were 2.6 mm in BUDS-positive patients and 0.2 mm in BUDS-negative patients. A Geissler stage III or IV scapholunate ligament rupture was confirmed in all BUDS-positive patients; by contrast, BUDS-negative patients exhibited either no lesion or a Geissler stage I injury. CONCLUSIONS: The BUDS test is a new radiologic test based on proven biomechanical effects that is able to accurately assess dynamic scapholunate dysfunctions. The analysis carried out found a correlation between radiographic and arthroscopic findings. Further research is needed to confirm the validity and reliability of the test. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Operative vs. nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Ruptures of the distal biceps tendon are most commonly due to traumatic eccentric loading in the middle-aged male population and can result in functional deficits. Although surgical repair has been demonstrated to result in excellent outcomes, there are few comparative studies that show clear functional benefits over nonoperative management. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the functional outcomes of operative and nonoperative management for these injuries. We hypothesized that operative treatment would be associated with significantly superior outcomes. METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials), Embase, and Web of Science databases. Outcomes of interest included range of motion (ROM), strength, endurance, and patient-reported outcomes including Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores. Summary effect estimates of the mean difference between operative and nonoperative management for each outcome were estimated in mixed effects models. RESULTS: Of an initially identified 6478 studies, 62 reported outcomes for a total of 2481 cases (2402 operative, 79 nonoperative), with an overall average age of 47.4 years (47.3 for operative, 50.3 for nonoperative). There were 2273 (98.5%) males and 35 (1.5%) females among operative cases, whereas all 79 (100%) nonoperative cases were males. Operative management was associated with a significantly higher flexion strength (mean difference, 25.67%; P < .0001), supination strength (mean difference, 27.56%; P < .0001), flexion endurance (mean difference, 11.12%; P = .0268), and supination endurance (mean difference, 33.86%; P < .0001). Patient-reported DASH and MEPS were also significantly superior in patients who underwent surgical repair, with mean differences of -7.81 (P < .0001) and 7.41 (P = .0224), respectively. Comparative analyses for ROM and pain VAS were not performed because of limited reporting in the literature for nonoperative management. CONCLUSION: This study represents the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare functional and clinical outcomes following operative and nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures. Operative treatment resulted in superior elbow and forearm strength and endurance, as well as superior DASH and MEPS.

Dynamic Supination in Congenital Clubfoot: A Modified Delphi Panel Approach to Standardizing Definitions and Indications for Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic supination is a well-recognized cause of congenital clubfoot deformity relapse. However, there is no consensus on how to diagnose it and there are varied approaches in its management. This study aims to define dynamic supination and indications for treatment by presenting consensus from an international panel of experts using a modified Delphi panel approach. METHODS: An international panel of 15 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons with clinical and research expertise in childhood foot disorders participated in a modified Delphi panel on dynamic supination in congenital clubfoot. Panelists voted on 51 statements using a 4-point Likert scale on dynamic supination, clinical indications for treatment, operative techniques, and postoperative casting and bracing. All panelists participated in 2 voting rounds with an interim meeting for discussion. Responses were classified as unanimous consensus (100%), consensus (80% or above), near-consensus (70% to 79%), and indeterminate (69% or less). RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for 34 of 51 statements. Panelists agreed dynamic supination is present when the forefoot is supinated during swing phase of gait with initial contact on the lateral border of the foot. There was also agreement that dynamic supination results from muscle imbalance between the tibialis anterior and the peroneus longus and brevis. There was no consensus on observation of hindfoot varus in dynamic supination, operative indications for posterior release of the ankle joint, or incisional approach for tibialis anterior tendon transfer. Reference to the calcaneopedal unit concept, planes of movement, and phases of gait were deemed important factors for consideration when evaluating dynamic supination. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus statements from the Delphi panel can guide diagnosis and treatment of dynamic supination in clubfoot deformity relapse, including clinical decision making regarding preoperative casting, surgical approach, and postoperative immobilization. Near-consensus and indeterminate statements may be used to direct future areas of investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Sensor Verification and Analytical Validation of Algorithms to Measure Gait and Balance and Pronation/Supination in Healthy Volunteers.

Numerous studies have sought to demonstrate the utility of digital measures of motor function in Parkinson's disease. Frameworks, such as V3, document digital measure development: technical verification, analytical and clinical validation. We present the results of a study to (1) technically verify accelerometers in an Apple iPhone 8 Plus and ActiGraph GT9X versus an oscillating table and (2) analytically validate software tasks for walking and pronation/supination on the iPhone plus passively detect walking measures with the ActiGraph in healthy volunteers versus human raters. In technical verification, 99.4% of iPhone and 91% of ActiGraph tests show good or excellent agreement versus the oscillating table as the gold standard. For the iPhone software task and algorithms, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) > 0.75 are achieved versus the human raters for measures when walking distance is >10 s and pronation/supination when the arm is rotated more than two times. Passively detected walking start and end time was accurate to approx. 1 s and walking measures were accurate to one unit, e.g., one step. The results suggest that the Apple iPhone and ActiGraph GT9X accelerometers are fit for purpose and that task and passively collected measures are sufficiently analytically valid to assess usability and clinical validity in Parkinson's patients.