Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 264
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 215, 2020 Mar 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32178674

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The paper aims to describe the 3-year incidence (2015/17) of aggressive acts against all healthcare workers to identify risk factors associated to violence among a variety of demographic and professional determinants of assaulted, and risk factors related to the circumstances surrounding these events. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of all 10,970 health workers in a large-sized Italian university hospital was performed. The data, obtained from the "Aggression Reporting Form", which must be completed by assaulted workers within 72 h of aggression, were collected for the following domains: worker assaulted (sex, age class, years worked); profession (nurses, medical doctors, non-medical support staff, administrative staff, midwives); aggressive acts (activity type during aggressive acts, season, time and location of aggressive acts); and type of aggressive acts (verbal, non-verbal, consequences, aggressors). RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-four (3.3%) workers experienced almost one aggression. The majority of the assaulted workers were female (77.5%), had worked for 6/15 years and were Nurses (64.3%). The majority of aggressive acts occurred during assistance and patient care (38.2%), in the spring and during the afternoon/morning shifts and took place in locations where patients were present (47.3%). The most prevalent aggression type was verbal (76.9%). The patient was the most common aggressor (46.7%). 56% of those assaulted experienced interruptions in their work. Being female, being < 50 years of age, having worked for 6-15 years were significant risk factors for aggression. Midwives suffered the highest risk of experiencing aggression (RR = 12.95). The risk analysis showed that non-verbally aggressive acts were related to assistance and patient care with respect to activity type, to the presence of patients and during the spring and afternoon/evening. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest the parallel use of future qualitative studies to clarify the motivation behind aggression. These suggestions are needed for the implementation of additional adequate prevention strategies on either an organizational or a personal level.


Asunto(s)
Agresión , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Violencia Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 967, 2020 Oct 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33087106

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nation-wide adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in hospitals has become a Turkish policy priority in recognition of their benefits in maintaining the overall quality of clinical care. The electronic medical record maturity model (EMRAM) is a widely used survey tool developed by the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) to measure the rate of adoption of EHR functions in a hospital or a secondary care setting. Turkey completed many standardizations and infrastructural improvement initiatives in the health information technology (IT) domain during the first phase of the Health Transformation Program between 2003 and 2017. Like the United States of America (USA), the Turkish Ministry of Health (MoH) applied a bottom-up approach to adopting EHRs in state hospitals. This study aims to measure adoption rates and levels of EHR use in state hospitals in Turkey and investigate any relationship between adoption and use and hospital size. METHODS: EMRAM surveys were completed by 600 (68.9%) state hospitals in Turkey between 2014 and 2017. The availability and prevalence of medical information systems and EHR functions and their use were measured. The association between hospital size and the availability/prevalence of EHR functions was also calculated. RESULTS: We found that 63.1% of all hospitals in Turkey have at least basic EHR functions, and 36% have comprehensive EHR functions, which compares favourably to the results of Korean hospitals in 2017, but unfavorably to the results of US hospitals in 2015 and 2017. Our findings suggest that smaller hospitals are better at adopting certain EHR functions than larger hospitals. CONCLUSION: Measuring the overall adoption rates of EHR functions is an emerging approach and a beneficial tool for the strategic management of countries. This study is the first one covering all state hospitals in a country using EMRAM. The bottom-up approach to adopting EHR in state hospitals that was successful in the USA has also been found to be successful in Turkey. The results are used by the Turkish MoH to disseminate the nation-wide benefits of EHR functions.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Provinciales/organización & administración , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Provinciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Turquía
3.
Radiology ; 291(1): 158-167, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30720404

RESUMEN

Background The American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry for CT enables evaluation of radiation dose as a function of patient characteristics and examination type. The hypothesis of this study was that academic pediatric CT facilities have optimized CT protocols that may result in a lower and less variable radiation dose in children. Materials and Methods A retrospective study of doses (mean patient age, 12 years; age range, 0-21 years) was performed by using data from the National Radiology Data Registry (year range, 2016-2017) (n = 239 622). Three examination types were evaluated: brain without contrast enhancement, chest without contrast enhancement, and abdomen-pelvis with intravenous contrast enhancement. Three dose indexes-volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), and dose-length product (DLP)-were analyzed by using six different size groups. The unequal variance t test and the F test were used to compare mean dose and variances, respectively, at academic pediatric facilities with those at other facility types for each size category. The Bonferroni-Holm correction factor was applied to account for the multiple comparisons. Results Pediatric radiation dose in academic pediatric facilities was significantly lower, with smaller variance for all brain, 42 of 54 (78%) chest, and 48 of 54 (89%) abdomen-pelvis examinations across all six size groups, three dose descriptors, and when compared with that at the other three facilities. For example, abdomen-pelvis SSDE for the 14.5-18-cm size group was 3.6, 5.4, 5.5, and 8.3 mGy, respectively, for academic pediatric, nonacademic pediatric, academic adult, and nonacademic adult facilities (SSDE mean and variance P < .001). Mean SSDE for the smallest patients in nonacademic adult facilities was 51% (6.1 vs 11.9 mGy) of the facility's adult dose. Conclusion Academic pediatric facilities use lower CT radiation dose with less variation than do nonacademic pediatric or adult facilities for all brain examinations and for the majority of chest and abdomen-pelvis examinations. © RSNA, 2019 See also the editorial by Strouse in this issue.


Asunto(s)
Dosis de Radiación , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Abdomen/diagnóstico por imagen , Abdomen/efectos de la radiación , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/efectos de la radiación , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Pelvis/diagnóstico por imagen , Pelvis/efectos de la radiación , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Tórax/efectos de la radiación , Adulto Joven
4.
BMC Public Health ; 19(Suppl 3): 467, 2019 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32326939

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Strong laboratory capacity is essential for detecting and responding to emerging and re-emerging global health threats. We conducted a quantitative laboratory assessment during 2014-2015 in two resource-limited provinces in southern China, Guangxi and Guizhou in order to guide strategies for strengthening core capacities as required by the International Health Regulations (IHR 2005). METHODS: We selected 28 public health and clinical laboratories from the provincial, prefecture and county levels through a quasi-random sampling approach. The 11-module World Health Organization (WHO) laboratory assessment tool was adapted to the local context in China. At each laboratory, modules were scored 0-100% through a combination of paper surveys, in-person interviews, and visual inspections. We defined module scores as strong (> = 85%), good (70-84%), weak (50-69%), and very weak (< 50%). We estimated overall capacity and compared module scores across the provincial, prefecture, and county levels. RESULTS: Overall, laboratories in both provinces received strong or good scores for 10 of the 11 modules. These findings were primarily driven by strong and good scores from the two provincial level laboratories; prefecture and county laboratories were strong or good for only 8 and 6 modules, respectively. County laboratories received weak scores in 4 modules. The module, 'Public Health Functions' (e.g., surveillance and reporting practices) lagged far behind all other modules (mean score = 46%) across all three administrative levels. Findings across the two provinces were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratories in Guangxi and Guizhou are generally performing well in laboratory capacity as required by IHR. However, we recommend targeted interventions particularly for county-level laboratories, where we identified a number of gaps. Given the importance of surveillance and reporting, addressing gaps in public health functions is likely to have the greatest positive impact for IHR requirements. The quantitative WHO laboratory assessment tool was useful in identifying both comparative strengths and weaknesses. However, prior to future assessments, the tool may need to be aligned with the new WHO IHR monitoring and evaluation framework.


Asunto(s)
Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Laboratorios/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , China , Recursos en Salud , Humanos , Laboratorios/organización & administración
5.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol ; 69(8): 323-331, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30650456

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Waiting times for the admission into a so called psychosomatic hospital in Germany prevent the necessary immediate treatment. They lead to further incapacity for work and chronic manifestation of the disease. It is reported that most psychosomatic hospitals have waiting times, but there are no studies on data on that. Therefore, it was the aim of this study to access prospectively in a defined region, how long it takes for the patients to get an outpatient preliminary talk and thereafter, how long they have to wait for their admission. METHODS: 7 hospitals out of the region of South-Württemberg took part on this study, 2 of them had bigger day hospitals. Data were assessed prospectively in 2015 over 9 months, in total 916 admissions were assessed. RESULTS: The waiting time until a preliminary talk, in which the indication for inpatient treatment was secured, was in the mean 25 days (SD=31). The waiting time after this talk until admission was 56 days (SD=47). Patients who waited for a day treatment had to wait even longer. An urgency remark, given by the therapist of the preliminary talk, as well as a private illness insurance led to shorter waiting times. The diagnosis had no influence on the waiting time. CONCLUSIONS: The waiting times are substantial and imply a burden for the patient and also for the health care system. It is recommended to assess and publish these waiting times on a regularly basis. Politics, but also the actors in the health care system should discuss if and how this deficit can be changed.


Asunto(s)
Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/psicología , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/terapia , Psicoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Listas de Espera , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Centros de Día/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Alemania , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
6.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 55(10)2019 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31623325

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Previous studies have demonstrated superior patient outcomes for thoracic oncology patients treated at high-volume surgery centers compared to low-volume centers. However, the specific role of overall hospital size in open esophagectomy morbidity and mortality remains unclear. Materials and Methods: Patients aged >18 years who underwent open esophagectomy for primary malignant neoplasia of the esophagus between 2002 and 2014 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Minimally invasive procedures were excluded. Discharges were stratified by hospital size (large, medium, and small) and analyzed using trend and multivariable regression analyses. Results: Over a 13-year period, a total of 69,840 open esophagectomy procedures were performed nationally. While the proportion of total esophagectomies performed did not vary by hospital size, in-hospital mortality trends decreased for all hospitals (large (7.2% to 3.7%), medium (12.8% vs. 4.9%), and small (12.8% vs. 4.9%)), although this was only significant for large hospitals (P < 0.01). After controlling for patient demographics, comorbidities, admission, and hospital-level factors, hospital length of stay (LOS), total inflation-adjusted costs, in-hospital mortality, and complications (cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and bleeding) did not vary by hospital size (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: After risk adjustment, patient morbidity and in-hospital mortality appear to be comparable across all institutions, including small hospitals. While there appears to be an increased push for referring patients to large hospitals, our findings suggest that there may be other factors (such as surgeon type, hospital volume, or board status) that are more likely to impact the results; these need to be further explored in the current era of episode-based care.


Asunto(s)
Esofagectomía/normas , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado de Salud , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Anciano , Esofagectomía/métodos , Esofagectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Med Care ; 56(2): e10-e15, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27820597

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Assisted living is a popular option for housing and long-term care. OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a methodology to identify Medicare beneficiaries residing in assisted living facilities (ALFs). RESEARCH DESIGN: We compiled a finder file of 9-digit ZIP codes representing large ALFs (25+ beds) by matching Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) assessments and Medicare Part B Claims to the Medicare enrollment records and addresses of 11,751 ALFs. Using this finder file, we identified 738,567 beneficiaries residing in validated ALF ZIP codes in 2007-2009. We compared characteristics of this cohort to those of ALF residents in the National Survey of Residential Care Facilities (n=3009), a sample of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (n=33,025,690), and long-stay nursing home residents (n=1,287,572). DATA SOURCES: A national list of licensed ALFs, Medicare enrollment records, and administrative health care databases. RESULTS: The ALF cohort we identified had good construct validity based on their demographic characteristics, health, and health care utilization when compared with ALF residents in the National Survey of Residential Care Facilities, community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries, and long-stay nursing home residents. CONCLUSIONS: Our finder file of 9-digit ZIP codes enables identification of ALF residents using administrative data. This approach will allow researchers to examine questions related to the quality of care, health care utilization, and outcomes of residents in this growing sector of long-term care.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Vida Asistida/estadística & datos numéricos , Hogares para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
8.
Br J Surg ; 105(13): 1807-1815, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30132789

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Centralization of surgery has been shown to improve outcomes for oesophageal and pancreatic cancer, and has been implemented for gastric cancer since 2012 in the Netherlands. This study evaluated the impact of centralizing gastric cancer surgery on outcomes for all patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma in the intervals 2009-2011 and 2013-2015 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Clinicopathological data, treatment characteristics and mortality were assessed for the periods before (2009-2011) and after (2013-2015) centralization. Cox regression analyses were used to assess differences in overall survival between these intervals. RESULTS: A total of 7204 patients were included. Resection rates increased slightly from 37·6 per cent before to 39·6 per cent after centralization (P = 0·023). Before centralization, 50·1 per cent of surgically treated patients underwent gastrectomy in hospitals that performed fewer than ten procedures annually, compared with 9·2 per cent after centralization. Patients who had gastrectomy in the second interval were younger and more often underwent total gastrectomy (29·3 per cent before versus 41·2 per cent after centralization). Thirty-day postoperative mortality rates dropped from 6·5 to 4·1 per cent (P = 0·004), and 90-day mortality rates decreased from 10·6 to 7·2 per cent (P = 0·002). Two-year overall survival rates increased from 55·4 to 58·5 per cent among patients who had gastrectomy (P = 0·031) and from 27·1 to 29·6 per cent for all patients (P = 0·003). Improvements remained after adjustment for case mix; however, adjustment for hospital volume attenuated this association for surgically treated patients. CONCLUSION: Centralization of gastric cancer surgery was associated with reduced postoperative mortality and improved survival.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Gastrectomía/mortalidad , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 19(8): e378-e386, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29923939

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe physicians' and nurse practitioners' perceptions of the national and local PICU physician and other provider supply in institutions that employ PICU nurse practitioners, assess for differences in perceptions of supply, and evaluate the intent of institutions to hire additional nurse practitioners to work in PICUs. DESIGN: National, quantitative, cross-sectional descriptive study via a postal mail survey from October 2016 to January 2017. SETTING: Institutions (n = 140) identified in the 2015 American Hospital Association Annual Survey with a PICU who employ PICU nurse practitioners. SUBJECTS: PICU physician medical directors and nurse practitioners. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 119 respondents, representing 93 institutions. Responses were received from 60 PICU medical directors (43%) and 59 lead nurse practitioners (42%). More than half (58%) of all respondents reported the national supply of PICU physicians is less than demand and 61% reported the local supply of PICU providers (physicians in all stages of training, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) is less than demand. Of the respondents from institutions that self-reported a local provider shortage (n = 54), three fourths (78%) reported plans to increase the number of PICU nurse practitioners in the next 3 years and 40% were likely to expand the nurse practitioner's role in patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Most PICU medical directors and lead nurse practitioners in institutions that employ PICU nurse practitioners perceived that national and local supply of providers to be less than the demand. Nurse practitioners are employed in PICUs as part of interdisciplinary models of care being used to address provider demand. The demand for more PICU nurse practitioners with expanded roles in care delivery was reported. Further evaluation of models of care and provider roles in care delivery can contribute to aligning provider supply with demand for care delivery.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras Practicantes/provisión & distribución , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/organización & administración , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
10.
Am J Emerg Med ; 36(2): 262-265, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28802542

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous alteplase reduces disability and improves functionality among acute ischemic stroke patients. Two decades after its approval, only a small fraction of patients get the treatment, and demonstrating its impact on mortality may make a strong case for its wider use. This study assessed the impact of thrombolytic treatment by alteplase on 1-year mortality and readmission among acute ischemic stroke patients. METHOD: The 2008-2013 Georgia Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry data were linked with the 2008-2013 hospital discharge and the 2008-2014 death data in Georgia. Multiple imputation was applied; a propensity score measuring the probability of receiving intravenous alteplase was calculated and used for matching. A conditional logistic regression was applied to compare 1-year mortality and readmission among propensity score matched pairs. RESULTS: Overall, 20.3% of 9620 acute ischemic stroke patients died and 22.4% were readmitted in one year. The multivariable regression result showed that patients who did not receive IV alteplase had a 1.49 (95%CI: 1.09-2.04; p-value=0.01) times higher odds of dying at one year than those who were treated with the thrombolytic agent. Among patients discharged home, no statistically significant difference was documented in the odds of being readmitted at least once within 365days post-stroke discharge. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: After accounting for patient differences and missing value, intravenous alteplase is associated with reduction in long-term mortality. The results of this study suggest that patients who are identified as eligible for intravenous alteplase need to be offered the treatment.


Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Georgia/epidemiología , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad
11.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 514, 2018 07 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29970095

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Primary caesarean section (PCS) rate is one of the main indicators of quality of care suggested by the Italian Government. Hospital rankings are usually based on it, therefore lower rates reflect more appropriate clinical practice. The aim of this study is to describe a five-year trend of PCS rate in Abruzzo region from 2009 to 2013 and to examine the medical indications for this mode of delivery. METHODS: Forty-five thousand one hundred forty-nine deliveries occurring from 2009 to 2013 were collected from all hospital discharge records (HDR) and analyzed. Among them we found 12,542 PCS. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using logistic regression methods to evaluate the relationship between maternal risk factors and PCS in hospital over 1000 delivery/yrs. RESULTS: The five-year PCS rate was 28.9%, with a decreasing trend from 31.4% in 2009 to 26.1% in 2013. Vasto Civil Hospital shows the lowest PCS rate (17.9% in 2013) among hospitals with a maximum of 1000 deliveries per year, while Pescara Civil Hospital shows the lowest PCS rate (25.4% in 2013) among hospitals with over 1000 deliveries per year. Women with major risk factors for cesarean section delivered more frequently in maternity units over 1000 delivery/yrs. Logistic regression analyses showed as diabetes, hypertension, twin pregnancy, fetal distress and preterm delivery were significant risk factors to deliver in unit over 1000 delivery/yrs. The most frequent (overall 66.6%) discharge diagnosis recorded in Hospital discharge records (HDR) is "Caesarean Delivery Without Indication". 7.3% of PCS made in Abruzzo concerns women living in other Italian regions. 11.4% of PCS contains one of the indications to caesarean section (CS) that the Italian Guidelines consider appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: During the analyzed period, Abruzzo showed a decreasing, but still too high, PCS rate, compared to the limits fixed by the Italian Ministry of Health. Considering the limitation of this study, based on administrative data that are poor in clinical information, it is not possible to define the appropriateness of all caesarean sections.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Femenino , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Maternidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Italia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Embarazo , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
12.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 759, 2018 Oct 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30286750

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Advances in the management of retinal diseases have been fast-paced as new treatments become available, resulting in increasing numbers of patients receiving treatment in hospital retinal services. These patients require frequent and long-term follow-up and repeated treatments, resulting in increased pressure on clinical workloads. Due to limited clinic capacity, many National Health Service (NHS) clinics are failing to maintain recommended follow-up intervals for patients receiving care. As such, clear and robust, long term retinal service models are required to assess and respond to the needs of local populations, both currently and in the future. METHODS: A discrete event simulation (DES) tool was developed to facilitate the improvement of retinal services by identifying efficiencies and cost savings within the pathway of care. For a mid-size hospital in England serving a population of over 500,000, we used 36 months of patient level data in conjunction with statistical forecasting and simulation to predict the impact of making changes within the service. RESULTS: A simulation of increased demand and a potential solution of the 'Treat and Extend' (T&E) regimen which is reported to result in better outcomes, in combination with virtual clinics which improve quality, effectiveness and productivity and thus increase capacity is presented. Without the virtual clinic, where T&E is implemented along with the current service, we notice a sharp increase in the number of follow-ups, number of Anti-VEGF injections, and utilisation of resources. In the case of combining T&E with virtual clinics, there is a negligible (almost 0%) impact on utilisation of resources. CONCLUSIONS: Expansion of services to accommodate increasing number of patients seen and treated in retinal services is feasible with service re-organisation. It is inevitable that some form of initial investment is required to implement service expansion through T&E and virtual clinics. However, modelling with DES indicates that such investment is outweighed by cost reductions in the long term as more patients receive optimal treatment and retain vision with better outcomes. The model also shows that the service will experience an average of 10% increase in surplus capacity.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Retina/terapia , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Bevacizumab , Simulación por Computador , Sistemas de Computación , Ahorro de Costo , Exactitud de los Datos , Atención a la Salud/normas , Inglaterra , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud , Humanos , Inversiones en Salud , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 930, 2018 Dec 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30509262

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Successful improvements in health care practice need to be sustained and spread to have maximum benefit. The rationale for embedding sustainability from the beginning of implementation is well recognized; however, strategies to sustain and spread successful initiatives are less clearly described. The aim of this study is to identify strategies used by hospital staff and management to sustain and spread successful nutrition care improvements in Canadian hospitals. METHODS: The More-2-Eat project used participatory action research to improve nutrition care practices. Five hospital units in four Canadian provinces had one year to improve the detection, treatment, and monitoring of malnourished patients. Each hospital had a champion and interdisciplinary site implementation team to drive changes. After the year (2016) of implementing new practices, site visits were completed at each hospital to conduct key informant interviews (n = 45), small group discussions (4 groups; n = 10), and focus groups (FG) (11 FG; n = 71) (total n = 126) with staff and management to identify enablers and barriers to implementing and sustaining the initiative. A year after project completion (early 2018) another round of interviews (n = 12) were conducted to further understand sustaining and spreading the initiative to other units or hospitals. Verbatim transcription was completed for interviews. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts, FG notes, and context memos was completed. RESULTS: After implementation, sites described a culture change with respect to nutrition care, where new activities were viewed as the expected norm and best practice. Strategies to sustain changes included: maintaining the new routine; building intrinsic motivation; continuing to collect and report data; and engaging new staff and management. Strategies to spread included: being responsive to opportunities; considering local context and readiness; and making it easy to spread. Strategies that supported both sustaining and spreading included: being and staying visible; and maintaining roles and supporting new champions. CONCLUSIONS: The More-2-Eat project led to a culture of nutrition care that encouraged lasting positive impact on patient care. Strategies to spread and sustain these improvements are summarized in the Sustain and Spread Framework, which has potential for use in other settings and implementation initiatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800304 , June 7, 2016.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Aguda/terapia , Apoyo Nutricional/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Atención a la Salud/normas , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades Hospitalarias , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Hospital/normas , Investigación Cualitativa , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Stroke ; 48(9): 2534-2540, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28818864

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Substantial variability exists in the use of life-prolonging treatments for patients with stroke, especially near the end of life. This study explores patterns of palliative care utilization and death in hospitalized patients with stroke across the United States. METHODS: Using the 2010 to 2012 nationwide inpatient sample databases, we included all patients discharged with stroke identified by International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision codes. Strokes were subclassified as ischemic, intracerebral, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. We compared demographics, comorbidities, procedures, and outcomes between patients with and without a palliative care encounter (PCE) as defined by the International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision code V66.7. Pearson χ2 test was used for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to account for hospital, regional, payer, and medical severity factors to predict PCE use and death. RESULTS: Among 395 411 patients with stroke, PCE was used in 6.2% with an increasing trend over time (P<0.05). We found a wide range in PCE use with higher rates in patients with older age, hemorrhagic stroke types, women, and white race (all P<0.001). Smaller and for-profit hospitals saw lower rates. Overall, 9.2% of hospitalized patients with stroke died, and PCE was significantly associated with death. Length of stay in decedents was shorter for patients who received PCE. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care use is increasing nationally for patients with stroke, especially in larger hospitals. Persistent disparities in PCE use and mortality exist in regards to age, sex, race, region, and hospital characteristics. Given the variations in PCE use, especially at the end of life, the use of mortality rates as a hospital quality measure is questioned.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Asiático/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización , Hospitales Privados/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Públicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Filantrópicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Indígenas Norteamericanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Cuidado Terminal , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 86(2): 319-326.e5, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28062313

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bile duct surgery (BDS), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), and ERCP are alternative interventions used to treat biliary disease. Our aim was to describe trends in ERCP, BDS, and PTC on a nationwide level in the United States. METHODS: We used the National Inpatient Sample to estimate age-standardized utilization trends of inpatient diagnostic ERCP, therapeutic ERCP, BDS, and PTC between 1998 and 2013. We calculated average case fatality, length of stay, patient demographic profile (age, gender, payer), and hospital characteristics (hospital size and metropolitan status) for these procedures. RESULTS: Total biliary interventions decreased over the study period from 119.8 to 100.1 per 100,000. Diagnostic ERCP utilization decreased by 76%, and therapeutic ERCP utilization increased by 35%. BDS rates decreased by 78% and PTC rates by 24%. ERCP has almost completely supplanted surgery for the management of choledocholithiasis. Fatality from ERCP, BDS, and PTC have all decreased, whereas mean length of stay has remained stable. The proportion of Medicare-insured, Medicaid-insured, and uninsured patients undergoing biliary procedures has increased over time. Most of the increase in therapeutic ERCP and decrease in BDS occurred in large, metropolitan hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Although therapeutic ERCP utilization has increased over time, the total volume of biliary interventions has decreased. BDS utilization has experienced the most dramatic decrease, possibly a consequence of the increased therapeutic capacity and safety of ERCP. ERCPs are now predominantly therapeutic in nature. Large urban hospitals are leading the shift from surgical to endoscopic therapy of the biliary system.


Asunto(s)
Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares/cirugía , Colangiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares/mortalidad , Colangiografía/tendencias , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/tendencias , Coledocolitiasis/diagnóstico por imagen , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Femenino , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Medicaid/tendencias , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
16.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 17(1): 212, 2017 03 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28302181

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Establishing a stroke unit (SU) in every hospital may be infeasible because of limited resources. In Australia, it is recommended that hospitals that admit ≥100 strokes per year should have a SU. We aimed to describe differences in processes of care and outcomes among hospitals with and without SUs admitting at least 100 patients/year. METHODS: National stroke audit data of 40 consecutive patients per hospital admitted between 1/7/2010-31/12/2010 and organizational survey for annual admissions were used. Descriptive analyses and multilevel regression were used to compare patient outcomes. Sensitivity analysis including only hospitals meeting all of the Australian SU criteria (e.g., co-location of beds; inter-professional team; weekly meetings; regular training) was performed. RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred ninety-eight patients from 72/108 eligible hospitals completing the audit (SU = 60; patients: 2,481 [mean age 76 years; 55% male] and non-SU patients: 417 [mean age 77; 53% male]). Hospitals with SUs had greater adherence to recommended care processes than non-SU hospitals. Patients treated in a SU hospital had fewer new strokes while in hospital (OR: 0.20; 95% CI 0.06, 0.61) and there was a borderline reduction in the odds of dying in hospital compared to patients in non-SU hospitals (OR 0.57 95%CI 0.33, 1.00). Among SU hospitals meeting all SU criteria (n = 59; 91%) the adjusted odds of having a poor outcome was further reduced compared with patients attending non-SU hospitals. CONCLUSION: Hospitals annually admitting ≥100 patients with acute stroke should be prioritized for establishment of a SU that meet all recommended criteria to ensure better outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Unidades Hospitalarias/provisión & distribución , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Australia , Femenino , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades Hospitalarias/organización & administración , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/provisión & distribución , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Stroke ; 47(2): 464-70, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26696643

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation for ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation, and previous studies have shown the underuse of anticoagulation for these patients in China. We sought to explore the underlying reasons and factors that currently affect the use of warfarin in China. METHODS: From June 2012 to January 2013, 19 604 patients with acute ischemic stroke were admitted to 219 urban hospitals voluntarily participating in the China National Stroke Registry II. Multivariable logistic regression models using the generalized estimating equation method were used to identify patient/hospital factors independently associated with warfarin use at discharge. RESULTS: Among the 952 acute ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, 19.4% were discharged on warfarin. The risk of bleeding (52.8%) and patient refusal (31.9%) were the main reasons for not prescribing anticoagulation. Larger/teaching hospitals were more likely to prescribe warfarin. Older patients, heavy drinkers, patients with higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission were less likely to be given warfarin, whereas patients with history of heart failure and an international normalized ratio between 2.0 and 3.0 during hospitalization were significantly associated with warfarin use at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of warfarin use remains low among patients with ischemic stroke and known nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in China. Hospital size and academic status together with patient age, heart failure, heavy alcohol drinking, international normalized ratio in hospital, and stroke severity on admission were each independently associated with the use of warfarin at discharge. There is much room for improvement for secondary stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients in China.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , China/epidemiología , Femenino , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemorragia , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Alta del Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Prevención Secundaria , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos
18.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(11): 3744-3748, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27172774

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to examine the impact of patient socioeconomic, clinical, and hospital characteristics on the utilization of robotics in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer. METHODS: Patients surgically treated for endometrial cancer at facilities that offered robotic and open approaches were identified from the National Inpatient Sample Database from 2008 to 2012. The groups were compared for socioeconomic, clinical, and hospital differences. Medical comorbidity scores were calculated using the Charlson comorbidity index. T tests and χ (2) were used to compare groups. Multivariable analyses were used to determine factors that were independently associated with a robotic approach. RESULTS: A total of 18,284 patients were included (robotic, n = 7169; laparotomy, n = 11,115). Significant differences were noted in all patient clinical and socioeconomic characteristics and all hospital characteristics. Multivariable analyses identified factors that independently predicted patients undergoing robotic surgery. These patients were older [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.008; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.004-1.011], white (aOR 1.38; 95 % CI 1.27-1.50), and privately insured (aOR 1.16; 95 % CI 1.07-1.26). Clinically, these women were more likely to be obese (aOR 1.20; 95 % CI 1.11-1.30) and to be undergoing an elective case (aOR 1.25; 95 % CI 1.11-1.40). Hospitals were more likely to be under private control (aOR 1.55, 95 % CI 1.39-1.71) but less likely to be located in the south (aOR 0.87; 0.81-0.93), quantified as large or medium (aOR 0.57; 95 %CI 0.50-0.67), or teaching hospitals (aOR 0.68; 95 % CI 0.63-0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic status and hospital characteristics are factors that independently predict robotic utilization in the United States. These racial, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities warrant further study regarding the utilization of this important technology.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Endometriales/complicaciones , Femenino , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Privados/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Renta , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
Med Care ; 54(4): 373-9, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26683782

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) profile hospitals using a set of 30-day risk-standardized mortality and readmission rates as a basis for public reporting. These measures are affected by hospital patient volume, raising concerns about uniformity of standards applied to providers with different volumes. OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively determine whether CMS uniformly profile hospitals that have equal performance levels but different volumes. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patient-level and hospital-level data using hierarchical logistic regression models with hospital random effects. Simulation of samples including a subset of hospitals with different volumes but equal poor performance (hospital effects=+3 SD in random-effect logistic model). SUBJECTS: A total of 1,085,568 Medicare fee-for-service patients undergoing 1,494,993 heart failure admissions in 4930 hospitals between July 1, 2005 and June 30, 2008. MEASURES: CMS methodology was used to determine the rank and proportion (by volume) of hospitals reported to perform "Worse than US National Rate." RESULTS: Percent of hospitals performing "Worse than US National Rate" was ∼40 times higher in the largest (fifth quintile by volume) compared with the smallest hospitals (first quintile). A similar gradient was seen in a cohort of 100 hospitals with simulated equal poor performance (0%, 0%, 5%, 20%, and 85% in quintiles 1 to 5) effectively leaving 78% of poor performers undetected. CONCLUSIONS: Our results illustrate the disparity of impact that the current CMS method of hospital profiling has on hospitals with higher volumes, translating into lower thresholds for detection and reporting of poor performance.


Asunto(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./normas , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Ajuste de Riesgo/normas , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales/clasificación , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
20.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 214(2): 153-163, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26593970

RESUMEN

This report describes the development of a measure of low-risk cesarean delivery by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Safely lowering the cesarean delivery rate is a priority for maternity care clinicians and health care delivery systems. Therefore, hospital quality assurance programs are increasingly tracking cesarean delivery rates among low-risk pregnancies. Two commonly used definitions of "low risk" are available, the Joint Commission (JC) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) measures, but these measures are not clinically comprehensive. We sought to refine the definition of the low-risk cesarean delivery rate to enhance the validity of the metric for quality measurement. We created this refined definition-called the SMFM definition-and compared it to the JC and AHRQ measures using claims-based data from the 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample of >863,000 births in 612 hospitals. Using these definitions, we calculated means and interquartile ranges (25th-75th percentile range) for hospital low-risk cesarean delivery rates, stratified by hospital size, teaching status, urban/rural location, and payer mix. Across all hospitals, the mean low-risk cesarean delivery rate was lowest for the SMFM definition (12.65%), but not substantially different from the JC and AHRQ measures (13.12% and 13.29%, respectively). We empirically examined the SMFM definition to ensure its validity and utility. This refined definition performs similarly to existing measures and has the added advantage of clinical perspective, enhanced face validity, and ease of use.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Rurales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Medicaid , Pacientes no Asegurados , Medicare , Embarazo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA