Child organ trafficking: global reality and inadequate international response.

In organ transplantation, the demand for human organs has grown far faster than the supply of organs. This has opened the door for illegal organ trade and trafficking including from children. Organized crime groups and individual organ brokers exploit the situation and, as a result, black markets are becoming more numerous and organized organ trafficking is expanding worldwide. While underprivileged and vulnerable men and women in developing countries are a major source of trafficked organs, and may themselves be trafficked for the purpose of illegal organ removal and trade, children are at especial risk of exploitation. With the confirmed cases of children being trafficked for their organs, child organ trafficking, which once called a "modern urban legend", is a sad reality in today's world. By presenting a global picture of child organ trafficking, this paper emphasizes that child organ trafficking is no longer a myth but a reality which has to be addressed. It argues that the international efforts against organ trafficking and trafficking in human beings for organ removal have failed to address child organ trafficking adequately. This chapter suggests that more orchestrated international collaboration as well as development of preventive measure and legally binding documents are needed to fight child organ trafficking and to support its victims.

Global initiatives to tackle organ trafficking and transplant tourism.

The increasing gap between organ supply and demand has opened the door for illegal organ sale, trafficking of human organs, tissues and cells, as well as transplant tourism. Currently, underprivileged and vulnerable populations in resource-poor countries are a major source of organs for rich patient-tourists who can afford to purchase organs at home or abroad. This paper presents a summary of international initiatives, such as World Health Organization's Principle Guidelines, The Declaration of Istanbul, Asian Task Force Recommendations, as well as UNESCO's and the United Nation's initiatives against trafficking of human organs, tissues, cells, and transplant tourism. Beyond the summary, it calls for more practical measures to be taken to implement the existing guidelines and recommendations, in order to prevent exploitation of the poor as organ providers. The paper suggests that an international legally binding agreement in criminalizing organ trafficking would be a step forward to bring a change in the global picture of organ trafficking and transplant tourism.

A human rights approach to human trafficking for organ removal.

Human trafficking for organ removal (HTOR) should not be reduced to a problem of supply and demand of organs for transplantation, a problem of organized crime and criminal justice, or a problem of voiceless, abandoned victims. Rather, HTOR is at once an egregious human rights abuse and a form of human trafficking. As such, it demands a human-rights based approach in analysis and response to this problem, placing the victim at the center of initiatives to combat this phenomenon. Such an approach requires us to consider how various measures impact or disregard victims/potential victims of HTOR and gives us tools to better advocate their interests, rights and freedoms.

Pakistan and kidney trade: battles won, battles to come.

This essay provides a brief overview of the rise of organ trade in Pakistan towards the end of the last century and the concerted, collective struggle--of physicians and medical associations aided by the media, journalists, members of civil society, and senior judiciary--in pressuring the government to bring about and implement a national law criminalizing such practices opposed by an influential pro-organ trade lobby. It argues that among the most effective measures to prevent re-emergence of organ trafficking in the country is increasing ethical live donations and above all, establishing sustainable, public supported deceased donor programs. To do this, the transplant community must recognize that organ transplantation is not merely a donor-recipient-physician transaction but a complex issue in which decisions to donate an organ are influenced by indigenous values and belief systems about human illness, life and death.

Assessing the Potential Impact of the Declaration of Istanbul 2008 on Internet Reporting of Human Organ Transplantation-Related Crimes Using Interrupted Time Series Analysis and Meta-Analysis Approaches.

BACKGROUND: A severe shortage in donor organs is the major driver for organ transplantation-related crimes. The Declaration of Istanbul 2008 (DOI) was created to stop such crimes. We investigated the impact of DOI on Internet reporting of transplantation-related crimes. METHODS: We conducted Google Advanced Searches to collect data on "kidney trade," "kidney sale," "organ trafficking," and "transplant tourism" in 15 original participant and 10 nonparticipant countries, 6 years prior through 8 years after the promulgation of DOI. The data were normalized for population and transformed to a logarithmic scale. Interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was applied to estimate the changes in slopes of the outcome variables before and after DOI, and then the overall intervention impact was calculated by meta-analysis. RESULTS: The combined results indicated that the overall impact of DOI on the reporting of "organ trafficking" and "transplant tourism" was statistically negative (reporting reduced significantly) as intended but on "kidney sale" and "kidney trade" was statistically positive (reporting increased significantly), and the increase was higher in the nonparticipant countries compared to the participant countries. The rate of reporting on "transplant tourism" declined in the participant countries more pronouncedly than in the nonparticipant countries. CONCLUSIONS: DOI has a positive impact on the reporting of "organ trafficking" and "transplant tourism" but not on the reporting of "kidney sale" and "kidney trade." The increased reporting of "kidney sale" and "kidney trade" can be indicative of an impact of DOI on public awareness and increased reporting of the residual transplantation-related crimes.

[Proposal for an anonymous reporting code organ trafficking: how transplant professionals can play a role in preventing this trafficking]. / Voorstel voor een anoniem meldpunt orgaanhandel.

Patients travel worldwide to undergo kidney transplantations. Care providers in the Netherlands encounter these patients, both before and after the transplantation. We present the results of a survey that was distributed among Dutch transplant professionals about their experiences with patients who have undergone a kidney transplantation abroad. We propose that care providers should report illegal transplantations. Of the 241 surveyed professionals, 100 treated patients who travelled to a country outside the European Union for a kidney transplant. Thirty-one professionals were certain that patients purchased their kidney, and sixty-five had suspicions that it had been purchased. The majority reported a conflict of duties. Professionals can help prevent organ purchase by detecting and disclosing information about organ trafficking networks. The aim of reporting is two-fold. Firstly, such disclosure can lead to increased knowledge and information about organ trafficking. Secondly, it can support the police and law enforcement agencies to investigate if networks are involved in facilitation of these transplantations. In this manner, those who facilitate organ trafficking can be prosecuted and exploitation of donors can be prevented.

Prevention of Transnational Transplant-Related Crimes-What More Can be Done?

BACKGROUND: Many nations are able to prosecute transplant-related crimes committed in their territory, but transplant recipients, organ sellers and brokers, and transplant professionals may escape prosecution by engaging in these practices in foreign locations where they judge the risk of criminal investigation and prosecution to be remote. METHODS: The Declaration of Istanbul Custodian Group convened an international working group to evaluate the possible role of extraterritorial jurisdiction in strengthening the enforcement of existing laws governing transplant-related crimes across national boundaries. Potential practical and ethical concerns about the use of extraterritorial jurisdiction were examined, and possible responses were explored. RESULTS: Extraterritorial jurisdiction is a legitimate tool to combat transplant-related crimes. Further, development of a global registry of transnational transplant activities in conjunction with a standardized international referral system for legitimate travel for transplantation is proposed as a mechanism to support enforcement of national and international legal tools. CONCLUSIONS: States are encouraged to include provisions on extraterritorial jurisdiction in their laws on transplant-related crimes and to collaborate with professionals and international authorities in the development of a global registry of transnational transplant activities. These actions would assist in the identification and evaluation of illicit activities and provide information that would help in developing strategies to deter and prevent them.

Pakistan's experience with kidney transplantation and trade: a call for international solidarity.

Pakistan has taken a long and tortuous road towards curbing the trade in organs within its borders. Yet, despite the phenomenal gains, several challenges remain in this area. For example, robust and sustainable deceased donor programmes must be established to meet the needs of a country which has a high prevalence of kidney disease and failure. Further, it is necessary to offer an alternative source of organs for transplantation to desperate patients who resort to buying these from the "market". Cultural factors and religious beliefs about the sanctity and inviolability of the corpse, as well as the lack of public and professional education regarding the procurement of organs from the deceased, pose considerable barriers that must be surmounted. We believe it is equally important that transplant professionals and the governments of affluent countries consider measures to discourage, if not prevent, their citizens from travelling to impoverished countries such as Pakistan to buy organs. Without a commitment, ethical and legal, to international solidarity in this matter, the goals that are already difficult for developing countries to achieve, ie, establishing deceased donor programmes and bringing an end to organ trafficking, will be even harder to achieve.

Evolución del procuramiento de órganos en el mundo / The evolution of organ procurement in the world

La evolución del procuramiento de órganos está relacionado con el desarrollo de diversos factores: 1. Desarrollo de programas estatales de donación cadavérica, que garanticen la obtención de órganos para trasplante de forma regular. 2. Tener una visión global de lo que representa el trasplante de órganos en el mundo y las tasas de donación cadavérica insuficientes para cubrir las necesidades actuales y futuras. 3. Desarrollo de programas paralelos y/o complementarios de donación de vivo. 4. Falta de recursos económicos en países con poco desarrollo donde el trasplante no es una prioridad. 5. Soporte gubernamental total y absoluto desde el punto de vista social-político-sanitario y, paralelamente, desarrollo cultural de la población. 6. Desarrollo legislativo de leyes de trasplantes, autorización de centros y registros de regulación de la actividad. Lo contrario al desarrollo de los factores descritos, puede derivar en el tráfico de órganos, y es fundamental el seguimiento de las recomendaciones de la Declaración de Estambul.

The evolution of organ procurement is related to development of different factors: 1. Development of Governmental Programmes on Cadaveric donation which will guarantee organ obtaining for transplant in a regular way. 2. Global vision about organ transplant in the world and cadaveric donation rates insufficient to cover today and future need. 3. Development of parallel and/or complementary programmes for Living Donation. 4. Lack of economical resources in developing countries where transplant is not a priority. 5. Total governmental support social-political-public health in parallel with development of general education. 6. Development of laws to regulate transplant, centre authorizations and registries to regulate the activity. The contrary to above described factors may result in organ trafficking, and to follow the Declaration of Istambul recommendations is fundamental.