Nivolumab plus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: No new agent has improved overall survival in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma when added to first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In this phase 3, multinational, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma either to receive intravenous nivolumab (at a dose of 360 mg) plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (nivolumab combination) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles, followed by nivolumab (at a dose of 480 mg) every 4 weeks for a maximum of 2 years, or to receive gemcitabine-cisplatin alone every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary outcomes were overall and progression-free survival. The objective response and safety were exploratory outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 608 patients underwent randomization (304 to each group). At a median follow-up of 33.6 months, overall survival was longer with nivolumab-combination therapy than with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.96; P = 0.02); the median survival was 21.7 months (95% CI, 18.6 to 26.4) as compared with 18.9 months (95% CI, 14.7 to 22.4), respectively. Progression-free survival was also longer with nivolumab-combination therapy than with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.88; P = 0.001). The median progression-free survival was 7.9 months and 7.6 months, respectively. At 12 months, progression-free survival was 34.2% and 21.8%, respectively. The overall objective response was 57.6% (complete response, 21.7%) with nivolumab-combination therapy and 43.1% (complete response, 11.8%) with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. The median duration of complete response was 37.1 months with nivolumab-combination therapy and 13.2 months with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 61.8% and 51.7% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin resulted in significantly better outcomes in patients with previously untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma than gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 901 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03036098.).

Impact of antihistamine use on the survival outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced cancer patients.

Histamine and H1 receptors play a crucial role in the tumor microenvironment. Preclinical data showed that concomitant use of antihistamines and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might increase the effect of ICIs. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of antihistamines on the oncological outcomes of ICIs. This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary cancer center. Advanced cancer patients treated with ICIs were included in this study. A total of 133 patients receiving ICIs in the metastatic setting were included. Melanoma (33.1%) was the most common tumor type. The most common ICI was nivolumab (63.2%). Fifty-five (38.4%) patients received antihistamines concomitantly with ICIs. The most common antihistamine was pheniramine (85.5%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) (8.2 vs. 5.1 months, P  = 0.016) and overall survival (OS) (16.2 vs. 7.7 months, P  = 0.002) were longer in patients receiving antihistamines concomitantly with ICIs. In multivariate analysis, PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40-0.98, P  = 0.042] and OS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.81, P  = 0.006) were also better in those patients after adjusting for confounding factors, such as performance status, bone or liver metastasis, and concurrent chemotherapy. This study suggested that antihistamines may enhance the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced cancer. If validated in prospective trials, antihistamines and ICIs combinations might be new options to improve oncological outcomes.

Antibody Drug Conjugates in Urological Cancers: A Review of the Current Landscape.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Our review delves into the progress across urological malignancies and discusses ongoing challenges and future directions in antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) development, emphasising their transformative potential in cancer care. RECENT FINDINGS: ADCs have advanced from hematologic to solid tumours, notably in breast cancer, and are now pivotal in metastatic urological cancers as both monotherapies and in combination regimens, underscored by the FDA's approval of enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan for metastatic urothelial cancer. Progress in metastatic prostate cancer, particularly with ADCs targeting PSMA and STEAP1, is noteworthy, although renal cell cancer presents ongoing challenges. There is a continual search for agents in the metastatic, relapsed testicular cancer landscape. ADCs have emerged as a pivotal innovation in oncology, blending targeted antibody therapy with potent cytotoxic drugs, significantly advancing treatment options for urological malignancies.

Accuracy and usability of artificial intelligence chatbot generated chemotherapy protocols.

Background: Medical practitioners are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots for easier and faster access to information. To our knowledge, the accuracy and availability of AI-generated chemotherapy protocols has not yet been studied. Methods: Nine simulated cancer patient cases were designed and AI chatbots, ChatGPT version 3.5 (OpenAI) and Bing (Microsoft), were used to generate chemotherapy protocols for each case. Results: Generated chemotherapy protocols were compared with the original protocols for nine simulated cancer patients. ChatGPT's overall performance was 5 out of 9 on protocol generation, and Bing's was 4 out of 9; this was statistically nonsignificant (p = 1). Conclusion: AI chatbots show both potential and limitations in generating chemotherapy protocols. The overall performance is low, and they should be used carefully in oncological practice.

[Box: see text].

Exploring the connection between microsatellite instability and inflammatory indicators in cancers.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the association between microsatellite instability (MSI) status and inflammatory indicators in patients with cancer. Patients & methods: A total of 204 patients with various cancer diagnoses, including 102 with MSI-high (MSI-H) and 102 with microsatellite stable tumors, were enrolled. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-albumin ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index were evaluated. Results: In microsatellite stable patients, NLR, LMR, PLR and systemic immune-inflammation index were significantly linked to worse survival in univariate analysis, and having a LMR ≤2.6 negatively affected survival in multivariate analysis, although these indicators did not affect the survival of MSI-H patients. Conclusion: The impact of chronic inflammation on survival varies with MSI status. Further research is needed for targeted therapies in different tumors.

Cancer-associated thrombosis and drug-drug interactions of antithrombotic and antineoplastic agents.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is often associated with malignant diseases and notably contributes to morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) brings additional costs to health expenditures and has a negative impact on oncological outcomes. Either the recurrence rate of VTE or bleeding complications are also higher in patients with cancer. Prophylactic anticoagulation has been recommended in peri-surgical periods, inpatient settings, and high-risk ambulatory patients. Although various risk stratification scores are used, none are ideal for identifying patients who can benefit from anticoagulant prophylaxis. New risk scoring systems or biomarkers are needed to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from prophylaxis with low bleeding risk. The questions about the patients who will be given prophylaxis and those who develop thromboembolism, with which drug, and how long they will be treated are still not fully answered. Anticoagulation is the cornerstone of the treatment, but management of CAT remains complex. Low molecular weight heparins and direct oral anticoagulants are effective and safe options for the treatment of CAT. Recognizing adverse effects, drug-drug interactions, and accompanying conditions that cause dose adjustment is crucial. Prevention and treatment of VTE in patients with cancer require a multidisciplinary and patient-based approach. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Cancer-associated thrombosis is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with cancer. Chemotherapy, surgery, and/or use of central venous access remarkably increase the risk of thrombosis. Prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered not only in inpatient follow-up and during peri-surgical period but also ambulatory patients with a high risk of thrombosis. Many parameters, such as drug-drug interactions, primary side of cancer, and comorbidities of patients should be considered when selecting anticoagulant drugs. More accurate risk stratification scores or biomarkers are still an unmet need.

Visceral Metastasis Predicts Response to New Hormonal Agents in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Visceral metastasis (VM) and a higher number of bone metastasis generally define high volume/risk in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Subgroup analysis of pivotal trials did not show a clear benefit of second-generation non-steroidal anti-androgens (NSAAs) in patients with VM. However, subgroup analysis of the trial assessing abiraterone acetate, a CYP 17 inhibitor, plus prednisone (AAP) showed an improved overall survival (OS) in patients with mCSPC with VM. We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and congress abstracts for the phase III randomized controlled trials of second-generation NSAAs and AAP in patients with mCSPC. In this pooled analysis, we included 6485 patients from the 6 phase III trials. The rate of patients with VM was 15.2%. Interestingly, in contrast to NSAAs, AAP seems to be effective in improving OS among patients with VM (hazard ratio, HR: 0.89, 95% CI, 0.72-1.11, P = .30 for second-generation NSAAs; HR: 0.58, 95% CI, 0.40-0.84, P = .004 for AAP). In contrast, both second-generation NSAAs (HR: 0.63, 95% CI, 0.57-0.70, P < .001) and AAP (HR: 0.68, 95% CI, 0.57-0.81, P < .001) improved OS in patients without VM. In this pooled analysis, we demonstrate that while AAP provided an OS improvement in patients with VM, second-generation NSAAs did not demonstrate a similar OS benefit in this population.

Efficacy of Capecitabine and Temozolomide Regimen in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Data From the Turkish Oncology Group.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to report the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus temozolomide (CAPTEM) across different lines of treatment in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study analyzing the data of 308 patients with metastatic NETs treated with CAPTEM between 2010 and 2022 in 34 different hospitals across various regions of Turkey. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 41.0 months (range: 1.7-212.1), and the median age was 53 years (range: 22-79). Our results across the entire patient cohort showed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.6 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 60.4 months. First-line CAPTEM treatment appeared more effective, with a median PFS of 16.1 months and a median OS of 105.8 months (median PFS 16.1, 7.9, and 9.6 months in first-, second- and ≥third-line respectively, P = .01; with median OS values of 105.8, 47.2, and 24.1 months, respectively, P = .003) In terms of ORR, the first-line treatment again performed better, resulting in an ORR of 54.7% compared to 33.3% and 30.0% in the second and third or higher lines, respectively (P < .001). Grade 3-4 side effects occurred only in 22.5% of the patients, leading to a discontinuation rate of 9.5%. Despite the differences in outcomes based on treatment line, we did not observe a significant difference in terms of side effects between the first and subsequent lines of treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The substantial superior outcomes in patients receiving first-line CAPTEM treatment highlight its potential as an effective treatment strategy for patients with metastatic NET.

Determining magnitude of benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in prostate cancer.

The treatment landscape for castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is undergoing significant advancements, particularly with the emergence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and their recent US FDA authorizations. The combination of olaparib with abiraterone and prednisone/prednisolone has gained approval for mCRPC patients harboring confirmed BRCA mutations. Subsequently, talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide was approved for patients with mutations in homologous recombination repair genes. Nevertheless, emerging evidence suggests that these treatments may confer benefits irrespective of specific biomarkers. While the understanding of biomarkers in therapy selection for mCRPC is expanding, further data are warranted to provide comprehensive elucidation for guiding clinical practice.

Nivolumab-induced immune-related neutropenia in a renal cell carcinoma patient.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have considerably improved the prognosis of solid tumors. However, this class of medications can cause immune-related adverse events, which represent a distinct spectrum of adverse events in cancer treatment. CASE REPORT: Here we present a case of immune-related neutropenia (irN) that occurred in a 47-year-old man with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). During the 18 months of nivolumab monotherapy, severe neutropenia occurred. Buccal mucosal aphthous ulcers and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positivity concurrently emerged with neutropenia. The patient was diagnosed with irN after a comprehensive evaluation ruled out all other likely causes. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Neutropenia improved with corticosteroids, but reoccurred with the introduction of nivolumab. During the approximately nine-month follow-up period after nivolumab treatment was permanently discontinued due to neutropenia, there was no disease progression. DISCUSSION: IrN associated with nivolumab treatment for metastatic ccRCC is uncommon. The pathophysiology of irN is not entirely understood. Corticosteroids are one of the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of irN. As ICIs become more widely used, medical oncologists will encounter this side effect more frequently.

Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors of Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study from the Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate clinical features, prognostic factors, and treatment preferences in patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). METHODS: Patients with metastatic nccRCC were selected from the Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium (TKCC) database. Clinical features, prognostic factors, and overall survival (OS) outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients diagnosed with nccRCC were included in this study. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (interquartile range: 56-69). Papillary (57.6%) and chromophobe tumors (12.7%) are common histologic subtypes. Sarcomatoid differentiation was present in 19.5% of all patients. When the patients were categorized according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk scores, 66.9% of the patients were found to be in the intermediate or poor risk group. Approximately half of the patients (55.9%) received interferon in the first line. At the median follow-up of 53.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34.7-71.8), the median OS was 19.3 months (95% CI: 14.1-24.5). In multivariate analysis, lung metastasis (hazard ratio [HR]:2.22, 95% CI: 1.23-3.99) and IMDC risk score (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.01-5.44 for intermediate risk; HR: 8.86, 95% CI: 3.47-22.61 for poor risk) were found to be independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: In this study, survival outcomes are consistent with previous studies. The IMDC risk score and lung metastasis are the independent prognostic factors for OS. This is an area that needs research to better treat this group of patients and create new treatment options.

Prognostic role of pan-immune-inflammation value in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor-signaling inhibitors.

AIM: To assess the prognostic effect of pan-immune inflammation value (PIV) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with abiraterone acetate (AA) or enzalutamide. METHODS: Patients with mCRPC treated with AA or enzalutamide between January 2010 and June 2021 were included in this study. The most recently examined complete blood count values in the 1-month period before treatment were used for calculating PIV. The relationship between overall survival (OS) and PIV was evaluated by multivariate analysis. By using PIV and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels which had shown survival effect at multivariate analysis, PIV-LDH combined score was established. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were included in this study. At the median follow-up of 34.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.4-36.8), the median OS was 21 months (95% CI: 17.6-21.3). The median OS in the low-PIV group was significantly higher than in the high-PIV group (34.4 months (95% CI: 21.3-47.5) vs. 14.3 months (95% CI: 10.0-18.7), p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis for OS, high PIV (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.11-3.13, p = 0.018) and LDH value 1.5 times the upper limit of normal and above (HR: 3.65 95%, CI: 1.86-7.16, p < 0.001) were associated with shorter OS. When survival analysis was performed according to the PIV-LDH combined score, the median OS was 34.4 months (95% CI: 22.2-46.6) in the low-risk group, 17.7 months (95% CI: 11.7-23.6) in the intermediate-risk group, and 8.4 months (95% CI: 5.1-11.7) in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). The C-index of the combined PIV-LDH score was higher than the C-index of PIV (0.65 vs. 0.61). CONCLUSION: In this study, we demonstrated that PIV was an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with mCRPC treated with AA or enzalutamide. Additionally, PIV-LDH combined score may be considered a promising composite peripheral blood-based biomarker to predict OS in those patients.

Chronic hyperglycemia based on diabetes is independently associated with decreased survival in patients with advanced cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have started a new era in treating patients with cancer. The effect of comorbidities and concomitant drug use on ICIs have become of interest in those patients. Data about the impact of hyperglycemia on response to ICIs in cancer patients are limited. All advanced-stage cancer patients treated with ICIs in Ankara University Medical Oncology Department were retrospectively evaluated. Patients treated in expanded access programs or clinical trials were excluded from the study. A total of 137 patients were included in this study. The most common primary tumor type was malign melanoma (32.8%) and nivolumab (62.3%) was the most common used ICI. More than half of patients (57.7%) had lung metastasis at the initiation of ICIs. Thirty-five patients (25.5%) had diabetes before initiating ICIs. Median baseline fasting glucose level was higher in patients with diabetes than those without diabetes (117 mg/dl vs. 99 mg/dl, P = 0.002). In all patients, median overall survival and progression-free survival were 11.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.1-14.4) and 5.9 (95% CI, 3.6-8.3) months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, diabetes was found to increase risk of death [hazard ratio (HR), 2.09; 95% CI, 1.27-3.43, P = 0.004) and disease progression (HR, 2.01, 95% CI, 1.29-3.09, P = 0.002). Hyperglycemia might decrease response to ICIs in patients with advanced cancer. This research area is still an unmet need in the immunotherapy era. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate the effect of hyperglycemia on the response to ICIs.

Clinical outcomes of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter study.

AIM: To compare survival outcomes, response rates, and adverse events (AEs) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) user and non-user patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with regorafenib. METHODS: We included 272 patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib in this study. Patients were divided into two categories according to their status of PPI use. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF), response rates, and safety. To exclude immortal time bias in survival analyses, we compared PPI non-user patients and all patients. RESULTS: There were 141 and 131 patients in the PPI non-user and user groups. Baseline characteristics were similar in each group. Pantoprazole was the most used PPI. At the median 35.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 32.6-37.9) months follow-up, the median OS was similar in PPI non-user and all patients (6.9 months (95% CI: 5.3-8.5) and 7.7 months (95% CI:6.6-8.8), p = 0.913). TTF was also similar in PPI non-user and all patients (3.3 months (95% CI: 2.7-3.9) and 3.5 months (95% CI: 3.0-4.0), p = 0.661). In multivariable analysis, no statistically significant difference was observed between PPI user and non-user groups in OS and TTF (hazard ratio (HR), 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77-1.28; p = 0.963 for OS; HR, 0.93; 0.77-1.20, p = 0.598 for TTF). The objective response rates (ORR) were similar in the PPI non-user and user groups (19.8% and 16.8%, p = 0.455). The rates of any grade AEs were also similar in each group. CONCLUSION: This study found no worse outcome in the combined use of PPI and regorafenib among patients with mCRC.

Key considerations and common adverse events for HIV-positive patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

HIV-infected patients are more susceptible to cancer due to their immune-compromised condition and HIV infection. Chronic inflammation and immune dysregulation are the main causes of cancer development in these patients. Because of lymphopenia and an immune-compromised condition, most HIV-infected patients with cancer were not considered for cytotoxic therapies, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a game-changer in many cancer types. However, not enough prospective data is available regarding the use of ICIs in HIV-infected patients with cancer. Retrospective data from case reports/series showed that ICIs are safe in HIV-infected patients with cancer.

The prognostic role of polypharmacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib.

Aim: To evaluate polypharmacy (PP) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving regorafenib. Methods: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving regorafenib were included and divided into two categories by their PP status: PP- (<5 regular drug use/day) and PP+ (≥5 regular drug use/day). Results: 80 patients were included. 31 (38.7%) patients had PP. The median number of drugs used was three and seven in PP- and PP+ patients, respectively. Antiemetics (26.5%) and antacids (48.4%) were the most common drugs used by PP- and PP+ patients, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the risk of death was higher in PP+ patients (hazard ratio: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2-3.7; p = 0.005). Conclusion: PP was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving regorafenib.

Regorafenib is a targeted therapy option that is used in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Because of the chemotherapy-refractory stage of the disease, patients are prone to use more medications for symptom palliation. Polypharmacy (PP) refers to the drug burden in an individual, and the use of five or more drugs in a day is usually considered to represent PP. In this study, the authors assessed the impact of PP in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib. The authors' study found that PP had a negative impact on survival outcomes in these patients. This is why inappropriate drug use should be assessed at each visit and the medication discontinued if it is not an essential part of the treatment.

Assessing population diversity in phase III trials of cancer drugs supporting Food and Drug Administration approval in solid tumors.

Our study aimed to assess inequities in the clinical trial participation for the selected patient groups. We searched the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) database and extracted phase-III clinical trial data from MEDLINE for each approved drug by the FDA between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2020. We analyzed the inclusion/exclusion criteria, participation according to gender, ethnic group, performance score, the positivity of HBV and HCV, and HIV, having comorbidities and brain metastasis. We compared the findings with that of the general population by retrieving data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We identified 142 phase III pivotal oncology trials that enrolled 105 397 patients. The proportion of female patients in trials was lower than their relative prevalence in the general population from SEER region (36% vs 49.6%, P < .001). The rates of black patients included were lower than their relative prevalence from SEER region (2.1% vs 9.8%, P < .001). 1.3% and 0.8% of patients had HBV and HCV infections, respectively. The patients' numbers with organ dysfunction were not established due to insufficient data from clinical trials. 1.6% of all patients had controlled brain metastasis. Black patients, women and patients with brain metastasis or with HBV and HCV were underrepresented. Our study underscores the importance of expanding the inclusion/exclusion criteria of pivotal oncology trials to be more representative of patients seen in clinical practice.

Prognostic importance of prostatic specific antigen response in patients who received Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen treatment for castration resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to analyze the prognostic importance of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) response in patients who received radioligand therapy (RLT) with Lu-177 Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for their castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients who received Lu-177 PSMA treatment for their castration-resistant prostate carcinoma were included. All the patients had undergone Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT scanning before Lu-177 PSMA therapy, which revealed multiple metastases. Patients were treated with a fixed dose (180 mCi) of Lu-177 PSMA at six to eight weeks intervals. PSA response was evaluated using Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria. Serum PSA response was classified as PSA progression (25% increase over the baseline and an increase in the absolute-value PSA level by at least 5 ng per millilitre), any <50% decline or ≥50% decline. PSA response was evaluated six weeks after every cycle. Response evaluation with radiological imaging and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT were performed before the first cycle and eight weeks after the last cycle. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated with a total of 171 cycles (median 4, range 3-7) of Lu-177 PSMA. A decline in serum PSA of ≥50% was detected in ten patients (33%) while a decline in PSA of any amount was observed in fifteen (50%) patients after the first cycle. After the last cycle, a decline in PSA ≥50% and of any amount was seen in thirteen (43%) and fourteen (46%) patients, respectively. Of the fifteen patients who were not responder after the first cycle, three (20%) had a decline in PSA of any amount after the completion of the RLT. Moreover, of the 20 patients who did not have a ≥50% decline in PSA level after the first cycle, four (20%) became responder after the last cycle. Regarding serum PSA response after the first cycle, median OS was significantly higher for patients who had ≥50% decline in PSA level with 21.0±10.0 (95% CI: 1.2-40.7) months compared to patients who had not with 8.0±2.6 (95% CI: 2.7-13.2) months (P=0.012). A decline in PSA of any amount after the first cycle did not have a significant impact on median OS (12.0±1.1 vs. 6.0±2.5 months, P=0.08). The decline in serum PSA level after the last cycle of treatment had a significant impact on OS. Median OS for the decline in PSA of any amount was calculated as 13.0±1.0 (95% CI: 10.9-15.0) months for responders and 6.0±1.9 (95% CI: 2.2-9.7) months for non-responders (P=0.016). Considering ≥50% of decline as a response, median OS was 21.0±5.8 (95% CI: 9.5-32.4) months for responders and 6.0±3.0 (95% CI: 0.1-11.8) months for non-responders (P=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Serum PSA level during RLT with Lu-177 PSMA remains a clinically significant factor to predict OS times. About twenty percent of patients who were not responder after the first cycle could become responder after the last cycle. However, patients without PSA response after completion of all cycles should be closely followed-up. Non-responder patients can achieve a response with further treatments.

ctDNA as a prognostic factor in operable colon cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: Using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) instead of historical clinicopathological factors to select patients for adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) may reduce inappropriate therapy. Material & methods: MEDLINE was searched on 31 March 2020. Studies, including data related to the prognostic value of ctDNA in the colon cancer patients after surgery and after ACT, were included. The generic inverse-variance method with a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Results: Four studies were included for this meta-analysis. ctDNA-positive colon cancer patients after surgery and ACT had a significantly increased risk of recurrence compared with ctDNA-negative patients. Conclusions: ctDNA is an independent prognostic factor, and this meta-analysis is a significant step for using ctDNA instead of historical prognostic factors in the adjuvant setting.

Nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from the Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium database.

Aim: The authors present real-world data on the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: The Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium (TKCC) database includes patients with mRCC from 13 cancer centers in Turkey. Patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in the second line and beyond were extracted from the TKCC database. Results: A total of 173 patients were included. The rates of patients treated with nivolumab in the second, third, fourth and fifth lines were 47.4%, 32.4%, 14.5% and 5.7%, respectively. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 24.2 months and 9.6 months, respectively. Nivolumab was discontinued owing to adverse events in 11 (6.4%) patients. Conclusion: Nivolumab was effective in patients with mRCC and no new safety signal was observed.

Lay abstract Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) that blocks the communication between T cells and cancer cells and instead activates T cells to fight against cancer. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is one of the most susceptible tumors to ICIs. The Checkmate 025 trial showed the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with previously treated mRCC. In this real-world study, 173 patients with mRCC were treated with nivolumab in the second line and beyond. Nivolumab was effective in the real-world setting without additional safety concerns.