Assessment of a Quantra-Guided Hemostatic Algorithm in High-Bleeding-Risk Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether a Quantra-guided hemostatic algorithm would reduce transfusion requirement and major bleeding compared with laboratory-guided testing in patients facing high-bleeding-risk cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Single-center before-and-after study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients facing high-bleeding-risk cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: Hemostatic algorithm was based on standard laboratory testing during the control period, then on the Quantra during the Quantra period. The primary endpoint was the number of red blood cell (RBC) units transfused on day 1 after surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After propensity-score matching, 66 patients were included in the Quantra group and 117 in the control group. The Quantra group received fewer RBC units on day 1 than the control group (2 [0-5] v 4 [2-6], p = 0.016, respectively). Intraoperatively, the Quantra group received fewer RBC (2 [0-3] v 3 [1-5], p = 0.005), less fresh frozen plasma (0 [0-3] v 3[2-5], p < 0.0001), and fewer platelet units (7.5 [0-10] v 8.2 [6.3-11.7], p = 0.014). The intraoperative rates of RBC, plasma, and platelet transfusion were reduced (64% v 78%, p = 0.05; 41% v 85%, p < 0.001; 55% v 82%, p = 0.001, respectively). The RBC and plasma transfusions were reduced on days 1, 2, and 7. The incidence of major bleeding on day 1 also was reduced (36% v 56%, p = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, implementation of the Quantra-guided hemostatic algorithm was associated independently with reductions in major bleeding. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a Quantra-based hemostatic algorithm was associated with a decrease in transfusion requirement and major bleeding after high-bleeding-risk cardiac surgery. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.

Postextubation Stridor in Severe COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 60-80% of patients admitted to ICU require mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress. We aimed to compare the frequency of postextubation stridor (PES) and to explore risk factors in COVID-19 subjects compared to those without COVID-19. METHODS: We performed an observational retrospective study on subjects admitted for severe COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation > 48 h during the first and second waves in 2020 and compared these subjects to historical controls without COVID-19 who received mechanical ventilation > 48 h between 2016-2019. The primary outcome was the frequency of PES, defined as audible stridor within 2 h following extubation. RESULTS: Of the 134 subjects admitted with severe COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation, 96 were extubated and included and compared to 211 controls. The frequency of PES was 22.9% in the COVID-19 subjects and 3.8% in the controls (P < .001). Factors independently associated with PES were having COVID-19 (odds ratio 3.72, [95% CI 1.24-12.14], P = .02), female sex (odds ratio 5.77 [95% CI 2.30-15.64], P < .001), and tube mobilization or re-intubation or prone positioning (odds ratio 3.01 [95% CI 1.04-9.44], P = .047) after adjustment on Simplified Acute Physiology Score II expanded). During the first wave, PES was significantly more common in subjects with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test on tracheal samples on the day of extubation (73.3% vs 24.3%, P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: PES affected nearly one-quarter of subjects with COVID-19, a proportion significantly higher than that seen in controls. Independent risk factors for PES were COVID-19, female sex, and tube mobilization or re-intubation or prone positioning. PES was associated with persistent viral shedding at the time of extubation.