MLPA as a genetic assay for the prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidy: the first Egyptian experience.

BACKGROUND: The prenatal diagnosis of syndromes caused by chromosomal abnormality is a long-established part of obstetric care. Several DNA-based molecular approaches have provided rapid prenatal diagnosis of of cytogenomic abnormalities. MLPA has become available for rapid aneuploidy detection of the most common chromosome abnormalities. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to introduce the MLPA technique as a method for the prenatal detection of aneuploidy in Egypt by its validation compared to the FISH technique. METHODS: Fifty AF samples were collected for this study and were subjected to MLPA and FISH assays to detect the most common prenatal chromosomal abnormality. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed previous reports that MLPA is analogous to FISH for detecting common aneuploidies and could be a quick and dependable tool for prenatal diagnosis. Therefore, initial prompt testing of AF samples for the copy number of the most common occurring aneuploidies is recommended.

Evaluation of MLPA as a comprehensive molecular cytogenetic tool to detect cytogenetic markers of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Egyptian patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common form of adult leukemia. This disease is genetically heterogeneous, and approximately 85% of patients with CLL harbor chromosomal aberrations that are considered effective prognostic biomarkers. The most frequent aberrations include deletions in 13q14, followed by trisomy 12, and deletions in 11q22.3 and 17p13 (TP53). Currently, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the most widely used molecular cytogenetic technique to detect these aberrations. However, FISH is laborious, time-consuming, expensive, and has a low throughput. In contrast, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is a reliable, cost-effective, and relatively rapid technique that can be used as a first-line screening tool and complement with FISH analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the contributions of MLPA as a routine standalone screening platform for recurrent chromosomal aberrations in CLL in comparison to other procedures. Thirty patients with CLL were screened for the most common genomic aberrations using MLPA with SALSA MLPA probemix P038-B1 CLL and FISH. RESULTS: In 24 of the 30 cases (80%), the MLPA and FISH results were concordant. Discordant results were attributed to a low percentage of mosaicism. Moreover, the MLPA probemix contains probes that target other genomic areas known to be linked to CLL in addition to those targeting common recurrent CLL aberrations. CONCLUSIONS: The usage of MLPA as the first screening platform followed by FISH technique for only the negative cases is the most appropriate approach for CLL diagnosis and prognosis.