RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence of infection in patients with prior biliary interventions undergoing hepatic embolotherapy following extended antibiotic prophylaxis using moxifloxacin monotherapy or a multidrug regimen. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol, retrospective review of a quality assurance database identified all liver-directed therapies (LDTs) at a tertiary care center between 2010 and 2019 with biliary intervention prior to LDT Records were reviewed for infectious complications within 3 months of chemo- or radioembolization. Patients were categorized based on extended antibiotic prophylaxis regimen: oral moxifloxacin monotherapy or multidrug regimen of levofloxacin and metroniodazole plus preprocedural neomycin and erythromycin. Procedures without at least 2 months of clinical follow-up, hepatic ablation, and procedures without extended antibiotic prophylaxis were excluded Regression analysis was used to analyze multivariate data to detect a difference in infection rate. RESULTS: Twenty-four chemoembolization and 58 radioembolization procedures were performed on 55 patients with prior biliary interventions. Forty-four used monotherapy and 38 used multidrug regimen. The incidence of infection was 16.7% (4/24) after chemoembolization and 13.8% (8/58) after radioembolization The incidence of infection in patients did not differ between antibiotic prophylaxis regimens (18.2% [8/44] with moxifloxacin monotherapy and 10.5% [4/38] multidrug regimen, P = .3) or between types of biliary interventions (24.1% [7/29] with bilioenteric anastomosis and 23.8% [5/21] biliary stenting, P = .3). CONCLUSIONS: The types of extended antibiotic prophylaxis (moxifloxacin monotherapy vs multitherapy), prior biliary intervention, and embolotherapy were not found to be associated with differences in the incidence of infectious complications in this population.