Craniofacial phenotypes associated with Robinow syndrome.

Robinow syndrome is characterized by mesomelic limb shortening, hemivertebrae, and genital hypoplasia. Due to low prevalence and considerable phenotypic variability, it has been challenging to definitively characterize features of Robinow syndrome. While craniofacial abnormalities associated with Robinow syndrome have been broadly described, there is a lack of detailed descriptions of genotype-specific phenotypic craniofacial features. Patients with Robinow syndrome were invited for a multidisciplinary evaluation conducted by specialist physicians at our institution. A focused assessment of the craniofacial manifestations was performed by a single expert examiner using clinical examination and standard photographic images. A total of 13 patients with clinical and molecular diagnoses consistent with either dominant Robinow syndrome (DRS) or recessive Robinow syndrome (RRS) were evaluated. On craniofacial examination, gingival hyperplasia was nearly ubiquitous in all patients. Orbital hypertelorism, a short nose with anteverted and flared nares, a triangular mouth with a long philtrum, cleft palate, macrocephaly, and frontal bossing were not observed in all individuals but affected individuals with both DRS and RRS. Other anomalies were more selective in their distribution in this patient cohort. We present a comprehensive analysis of the craniofacial findings in patients with Robinow Syndrome, describing associated morphological features and correlating phenotypic manifestations to underlying genotype in a manner relevant for early recognition and focused evaluation of these patients.

Extremity anomalies associated with Robinow syndrome.

Robinow syndrome, a rare genetic disorder, is characterized by skeletal dysplasia with, among other anomalies, extremity and hand anomalies. There is locus heterogeneity and both dominant and recessive inheritance. A detailed description of associated extremity and hand anomalies does not currently exist due to the rarity of this syndrome. This study seeks to document the hand anomalies present in Robinow syndrome to allow for improved rates of timely and accurate diagnosis. A focused assessment of the extremities and stature was performed using clinical examination and standard photographic images. A total of 13 patients with clinical and molecular diagnosis consistent with dominant Robinow syndrome or recessive Robinow syndrome were evaluated. All patients had limb shortening, the most common of which was mesomelia; however, rhizomelia and micromelia were also seen. These findings are relevant to clinical characterization, particularly as Robinow syndrome has classically been defined as a "mesomelic disorder." A total of eight distinct hand anomalies were identified in 12 patients with both autosomal recessive and dominant forms of Robinow syndrome. One patient did not present with any hand differences. The most common hand findings included brachydactyly, broad thumbs, and clinodactyly. A thorough understanding of the breadth of Robinow syndrome-associated extremity and hand anomalies can aid in early patient identification, improving rates of timely diagnosis and allowing for proactive management of sequelae.

Multidisciplinary management of a previously unreported presentation of severe aplasia cutis congenita.

Aplasia cutis congenita (ACC) is characterized by the complete or partial absence of skin at birth, with 85% of cases of ACC involving the scalp vertex. The etiology of ACC is unclear and appears to be multifactorial. We present the case of a 3-month-old boy who presented with a diagnosis of non-scalp ACC affecting approximately 80% of his total body surface area at birth. This case adds to the literature due to the patient's survival beyond the first day of life and his unique and severe distribution of defects, which led to respiratory compromise and required multidisciplinary management.

Employment as a Plastic Surgeon: A Review of Trends and Demand Across the Field.

ABSTRACT: Intrinsic to the field of plastic surgery, constant changes in health care policy, consumer demands, and medical technology necessitate periodic evaluation of trends in employment over time. In this article, we review the existing literature to report the current state of plastic surgery employment in the United States with regards to compensation, practice patterns, subspecialty trends, contract negotiation, representation of women in the field of plastic surgery, burnout and job satisfaction, and retirement. Understanding how the plastic surgery job market is changing not only serves as a valuable tool for the individual plastic surgeon regarding the navigation of his or her own career but also offers insight into the future of the field as a whole.

Cost-effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Care in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary care has been previously shown to improve outcomes for patients and providers alike, fostering interprofessional collaboration and communication. Many studies have demonstrated the beneficial health care outcomes of interdisciplinary care. However, there has been minimal focus on the cost-effectiveness of such care, particularly in the realm of plastic surgery. This is the first systematic review to examine cost savings attributable to plastic surgery involvement in multidisciplinary care. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review of articles published on cost outcomes associated with multidisciplinary teams including a plastic surgeon was performed. Included articles reported on cost outcomes directly or indirectly attributable to a collaborative intervention. Explicitly reported cost savings were totaled on a per-patient basis. Each article was also reviewed to determine whether the authors ultimately recommended the team-based intervention described. RESULTS: A total of 604 articles were identified in the initial query, of which 8 met the inclusion criteria. Three studies reported explicit cost savings from multidisciplinary care, with cost savings ranging from $707 to $26,098 per patient, and 5 studies reported changes in secondary factors such as complication rates and length of stay. All studies ultimately recommended multidisciplinary care, regardless of whether cost savings were achieved. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary plastic surgery care examined both primary cost savings and associated quality outcomes, such as length of stay, complication rate, and resource consumption. Our findings indicate that the inclusion of plastic surgery in team-based care provides both direct and indirect cost savings to all involved parties.

Patents for the Plastic Surgeon: A Primer.

ABSTRACT: Although innovation and entrepreneurship are complementary in the process of creating new products, plastic surgeons are frequently discouraged by the challenges associated with the regulatory and administrative environments in patent filing. The following primer provides a step-by-step guide for understanding patents and outlines the steps and costs involved in patent filing. To improve opportunities for successful patent filing, we elaborate on some of the common pitfalls in the process, including the timing of public disclosure, conducting a private art search, selecting a patent attorney or agent, determining the level of inventor involvement, and navigating academic and employment contracts. The innovative drive in plastic surgery provides a strong impetus for strengthening knowledge about patents and patent filing in order to support efforts for providing high-value patient care.

Multidisciplinary care in surgery: Are team-based interventions cost-effective?

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary care has been shown to improve outcomes for patients, and interprofessional collaboration has been demonstrated to be beneficial for providers. In the field of surgery, although a large number of multidisciplinary care teams have been described, no study to date has examined whether or not these team-based interventions are generally cost-effective. This is the first systematic review to examine cost savings attributable to multidisciplinary care across all surgical fields. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review of articles published on cost outcomes associated with multidisciplinary surgical teams was performed. Selected articles reported on cost outcomes directly attributable to a collaborative intervention. Cost savings were totaled on a per-patient basis. Each article was also reviewed to determine whether the authors ultimately recommended the team-based intervention described. RESULTS: A total of 1421 articles were identified in the initial query, of which 43 met inclusion criteria. Thirty-nine studies (91%) reported multidisciplinary care to be cost effective, with an average cost savings among all studies of $5815 per patient. No significant differences in the amount of savings achieved were found between different intervention subtypes. All studies ultimately recommended (40) or gave mixed reviews (3) of multidisciplinary care, regardless of whether cost savings were achieved. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary surgical care is beneficial not only in terms of patient and provider outcomes, but also in reference to its cost-effectiveness. Well-designed multidisciplinary teams tend to optimize perioperative care for all involved parties. Efforts to improve surgical care should employ multidisciplinary teams to promote both quality and cost-effective care.

Cost-effectiveness of surgical comanagement: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of surgical comanagement programs on healthcare system costs. BACKGROUND: With increasing emphasis on multidisciplinary care, surgical comanagement programs are increasing in popularity. However, the overall cost-effectiveness of these programs has yet to be evaluated. METHODS: Pubmed, Scopus, and Cochrane were systematically searched for studies that reported on cost outcomes after implementation of a surgical comanagement program. Data points extracted included study design details, cost outcomes, complication rates, duration of hospital stay, hospital volume changes, patient satisfaction, mortality, and overall multidisciplinary care recommendation. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies were included. Five of the 8 studies reported cost savings, with an average savings of $4132 per patient. Three of the 8 studies reported increases in costs, with an average increase of $11,128 per patient. Seven of the 8 studies reported decreases in length-of-stay, with an average decrease of 1.29 days. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical comanagement programs have had mixed results on overall hospital costs, but cost saving interventions do not sacrifice the quality of patient care delivered.

Operative Pediatric Hand Infections: A Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Infections in the pediatric population are a less well studied topic in hand surgery. Crucial aspects of the management of pediatric hand infections differ from adults, though much of current treatment is generalized from adult care. This study evaluates our clinical experience with regards to the epidemiology, management, and outcomes of pediatric hand infections requiring operative intervention. METHODS: A 7-year retrospective chart review was performed of all pediatric patients who required operative intervention for hand infections at Texas Children's Hospital. Clinical information was collected and analyzed, including demographics, infection characteristics, management, and outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria for our study over the 7-year period. Of these, 7% (n=4) had a pre-existing diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and 5% (n=3) had a recent history of upper extremity infections. The most common infection was a discrete abscess, whereas urgent/emergent conditions represented 25% (n=14) of infections. Radiographic changes consistent with osteomyelitis were present in over one-quarter of patients (n=13, 23%). The median length of hospital stay was 3 days (95% confidence interval: 3.05-5.05) and the most common pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (n=33, 58%), with slightly more being methicillin sensitive (MSSA) than resistant (MRSA) (n=19, 33% vs. n=14, 25%). The incidence of reoperation was 12.5% (n=7). CONCLUSIONS: Hand infections are a common problem in the pediatric population. Cases tend to be associated with accidental trauma and discrete abscesses colonized by MSSA/MRSA. The vast majority of cases require only one operation and a short course of wound care before discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic study.

A Novel Sand Dollar and Staves Technique for Unilateral Lambdoid Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral lambdoid synostosis (ULS) is the rarest form of craniosynostosis. Due to the associated cranio-caudal shift seen in ULS, surgical correction is technically challenging from a morphological standpoint. Herein, the authors present a novel "Sand-Dollar and Staves" technique for the repair of ULS. METHODS: A zigzag coronal incision is performed, and an anteriorly-based pericranial flaps are elevated. Prefabricated cutting guides are placed and the calvarium is marked. To treat the flattening on the ipsilateral side, a wedged suturectomy is performed with additional barrel staves. A large circle centered over the bulging on the contralateral side is cut out above the open lambdoid suture. This piece is barrel staved in a radial fashion, leaving the center intact and creating a Sand-Dollar appearance. This disk is then flattened and trimmed. The modified Sand-Dollar is fixed using an absorbable plating system. While gentle pressure is applied to the Sand-Dollar piece as it is being secured, the ipsilateral side demonstrates compensatory filling. Results are evaluated using the Whitaker Classification. RESULTS: Four patients underwent surgical correction with this technique. The procedure was performed at mean age of 11.7 months. The mean operative time was 2.5 hours. Intraoperative blood loss was 50 to 100 ml. Total hospitalization time was 2 to 3 days. No post-operative complications were encountered. Whitaker scores ranged from 1 to 1.5. The mean follow-up was 10 months. CONCLUSION: The Sand-Dollar and Staves procedure is a novel, single-stage approach for the management of ULS with decreased operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay with satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.

Fascicular Turnover Flap: An Approach for Facial Nerve Reconstruction.

ABSTRACT: Facial nerve injuries are a common complication associated with parotidectomy. These functionally debilitating injuries are conventionally treated with nonvascularized nerve grafting; however, this reconstructive modality produces moderate donor site morbidity and has limited efficacy for repairing large defects. In addition, nonvascularized nerve grafts are highly susceptible to radiotherapy and require a well-vascularized wound bed to produce adequate therapeutic results. The fascicular turnover flap, described by Koshima et al, utilizes a single fascicle to bridge two nerve endings that are in series with no donor site morbidity. Although studies have demonstrated this technique's efficacy, there is a paucity of data regarding its use in patients undergoing facial nerve reconstruction. Herein, we describe our early clinical experience using the fascicular turnover flap to reconstruct branches of the facial nerve in patients undergoing extensive parotidectomy. Our patients underwent successful reconstruction of the nerve defects produced by parotidectomy using the fascicular turnover flap. Despite postoperative radiotherapy, both patients demonstrated complete functional recovery at six months postoperatively. Although formal head-to-head studies are needed to compare the outcomes of this technique versus conventional nerve grafting for facial nerve reconstruction, our preliminary experiences suggest that the fascicular turnover flap is a viable modality of reconstruction with great potential.

Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With PEEK Versus Titanium Cranioplasty Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Several materials are available for cranioplasty reconstruction and consensus regarding the ideal material is lacking. The goal of this study is to present surgical and patient-reported outcomes with PEEK versus Titanium alloplastic cranioplasty. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent alloplastic cranioplasty with PEEK or Titanium from 2010 to 2017 was conducted. Patient demographics and complications were abstracted and analyzed. Information regarding patient-reported outcomes was collected through a telephone survey. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients (median age 55 years) who underwent 77 cranioplasties were identified (38% PEEK, n = 29; 62% Titanium, n = 48). Overall complication rates were similar between the PEEK (24%, n = 7) and Titanium groups (23%, n = 11), P = 0.902. Similarly, implant failure was similar between the 2 groups (7% in PEEK (n = 2), 13% in Titanium (n = 6), P = 0.703). History of radiation was associated with increased rate of infection in patients with Titanium mesh cranioplasty (38% in radiated patients (n = 3), 3% in nonradiated patients (n = 1), P = 0.012) but not PEEK implants (0% infection rate in radiated patients (n = 0), 15% in nonradiated patients (n = 4), P = 1.000). A total of 24 patients (33% response rate) participated in the telephone survey. All PEEK cranioplasty patients who responded to our survey (n = 13) reported good to excellent satisfaction, while 72% of our titanium mesh cohort (n = 8) described good or excellent satisfaction and 27% (n = 3) reported acceptable result. CONCLUSION: Cranial reconstruction is associated with high satisfaction among cranioplasty patients with PEEK or Titanium showing comparable complications, failure, and patient-reported satisfaction rates. Patients with history of radiotherapy demonstrated a higher infection rate when titanium mesh was used.

Distraction Osteogenesis: Mandible and Maxilla.

Mandibular and maxillary deformities commonly require surgical intervention. Prior to distraction osteogenesis, traditional modalities involving single-staged translocation and rigid fixation were used to correct these craniofacial anomalies. Distraction osteogenesis has evolved as a compelling alternative for treating aesthetic and functional dentofacial defects. The process of distraction osteogenesis involves three phases-latency, activation, and consolidation-which allow for appropriate translation of the affected craniofacial skeleton. This review will cover the role of distraction for managing congenital and acquired deformities of the mandible and maxilla. This novel technique can be performed at numerous anatomical sites along the craniofacial skeleton to treat a variety of anomalies, which serves as a testament to its adaptability and efficacy. Importantly, distraction osteogenesis also has the ability to simultaneously increase bone length and the overlying soft tissue envelope. This advantage results in larger advancements with reduced relapse rates and improved patient satisfaction. While complications remain a concern, it stands to reason that the measurable benefits observed underscore the power and versatility of distraction osteogenesis.

Pediatric Fronto-Orbital Skull Reconstruction.

Craniofacial surgery in children is a highly challenging discipline that requires extensive knowledge of craniofacial anatomy and pathology. Insults to the fronto-orbital skeleton have the potential to inflict significant morbidity and even mortality in patients due to its proximity to the central nervous system. In addition, significant aesthetic and ophthalmologic disturbances frequently accompany these insults. Craniosynostosis, facial trauma, and craniofacial tumors are all pathologies that frequently affect the fronto-orbital region of the craniofacial skeleton in children. While the mechanisms of these pathologies vary greatly, the underlying principles of reconstruction remain the same. Despite the limited data in certain areas of fronto-orbital reconstruction in children, significant innovations have greatly improved its safety and efficacy. It is imperative that further investigations of fronto-orbital reconstruction are undertaken so that craniofacial surgeons may provide optimal care for these patients.

Use of Single Chimeric Free Flaps or Double Free Flaps for Complex Head and Neck Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Free flaps have become the preferred reconstructive approach to restore form and function for patients presenting with complex head and neck defects. For composite, complex defects for which a regular free flap might not meet all reconstructive demands, adequate coverage can be achieved with either a single chimeric free flap or a double free flap. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective chart review of patients who underwent either single chimeric free flap or double free flap reconstruction. Indications for reconstruction included defects resultant from head and neck tumor or osteoradionecrosis resections. We extracted the following variables: tumor location, defect, flap(s) performed, and postoperative complications. Unpaired t-tests were performed to evaluate for statistically significant differences in complications encountered between the single chimeric versus the double free flap patient groups. RESULTS: In our series of 44 patients, a total of 55 single chimeric and double free flaps were performed. We found no significant difference in overall complications (p = 0.41) or flap/skin paddle loss (p = 0.45) between the groups. There were three total flap losses; two patients underwent successful salvage procedures and one patient died. The anterolateral thigh (ALT) was the most common free flap (70%) used in our series, and 98% of our patients completed successful reconstruction. CONCLUSION: As the initial reconstructive effort is critical for achieving favorable long-term outcomes in complex head and neck cases, effective and safe techniques should be employed to ensure optimal delivery of care. We believe that single chimeric and double free flap techniques should be appropriately utilized as part of the armamentarium of head and neck reconstructive microsurgeons.

A Systematic Review of Wellness in Plastic Surgery Training.

BACKGROUND: Physician and resident wellness has been increasingly emphasized as a means of improving patient outcomes and preventing physician burnout. Few studies have been performed with a focus on wellness in plastic surgery training. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to systematically review what literature exists on the topic of wellness in plastic surgery training and critically appraise it. METHODS: A PubMed search was performed to identify journal articles related to wellness in plastic surgery residency. Seventeen studies (6 cohort and 11 cross-sectional) met inclusion criteria and were appraised with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOQAS) to determine the quality of the studies based on selection, comparability, and outcome metrics. RESULTS: Critical assessment showed that the studies were highly variable in focus. Overall, the quality of the data was low, with an average NOQAS score of 4.1. Only 2 studies focused on plastic surgery residents, examining work hours and social wellness, respectively; they were awarded NOQAS scores of 3 and 4 out of 10. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review suggest that little research has been devoted to wellness in surgery training, especially in regard to plastic surgery residents, and what research that has been performed is of relatively low quality. The available research suggests a relatively high prevalence of burnout among plastic surgery residents. Evidence suggests some organization-level interventions to improve trainee wellness. Because outcomes-based data on the effects of such interventions are particularly lacking, further investigation is warranted.

Augmentation Phalloplasty for Acquired Penile Shortening: A Systematic Review of Techniques, Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction, and Limitations.

INTRODUCTION: Although an infrequent cause of small penile size in adult men, acquired penile shortening represents a particular reconstructive challenge due to preexisting penile anatomic deformities. AIM: With numerous techniques being performed, the purpose of our study is to assess available literature on length enhancement procedures used for acquired penile shortening deformities. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses. Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Databases were used to identify papers on augmentation Phalloplasty in non-transgender males with acquired penile shortening from 1990 to 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Outcomes, complications, and patient-reported satisfaction were analyzed. RESULTS: 12 articles, involving 931 patients and 8 primary procedures, met our inclusion criteria. The majority of articles had level of evidence of 4 (83%) and Newcastle Ottawa Scale score of 6 (92%, moderate risk of bias). All studies reported mean penile length gain; however, inconsistent methodology was used when measuring penile dimensions. Mean length gain ranged from 0.6 to 6.4 cm. Overall, the mean complication rate for all techniques ranged from 0% to 50%. Post-operative satisfaction was reported in 10 (83%) studies, 7 of which used a validated scale. Patients were generally satisfied, with reported satisfaction rates ranging from 77% to 100%. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: While numerous procedures have been described, the significant limitations in the available data preclude identifying a single superior procedure. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The significant heterogeneity in the reported literature is a limitation of this study and highlights the need for standardized reporting. However, this study is the first to analyze augmentation phalloplasty literature in the setting of acquired penile shortening. CONCLUSION: Augmentation phalloplasty techniques for acquired penile shortening are evolving and are continuously being modified; best-practice guidelines are crucial to achieve safe and satisfactory outcomes in this population. Abu-Ghname A, Banuelos J, Davis MJ, et al. Augmentation Phalloplasty for Acquired Penile Shortening: A Systematic Review of Techniques, Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction, and Limitations. J Sex Med 2020;17:331-341.

The Discrepancy Between Perceived Importance and Actual Delivery of Business Education in Residency: A Survey of Program Directors.

BACKGROUND: In the contemporary healthcare environment, there is a need for physicians to understand business fundamentals. Nonsurgical residencies have implemented formal business education, but surgical training programs have been slower to adapt. Further research is needed to evaluate the status of business education in plastic surgery residency. METHODS: A 12-question survey was created. Ninety program director (PD) e-mails were obtained and the survey was distributed using SurveyMonkey. The survey evaluated program demographics and current resources, commitments, and attitudes toward business training. The survey also identified the most important topics to include in a business curriculum. RESULTS: Thirty-six surveys were completed (response rate = 40%). Whereas most PDs agreed that business education in plastic surgery residency was important (78%) and that their programs should have more business training (73%), only 39% currently offered business training. Only 42% of PDs believed that their chief residents were competent to handle the business aspects of plastic surgery upon graduation. No programs offered a formal gap year to pursue a professional business degree. The most important topics identified for a business curriculum were economics and finance (83.3%), management (64%), and marketing (53%). CONCLUSIONS: There is disconnect between perceived importance and resources available for plastic surgery residents to receive business education. Increased attention is needed to resolve this discrepancy to ensure that future plastic surgeons are equipped to excel in their personal careers and stimulate the advancement of the field. Future research should aim to outline a business curriculum for plastic surgery trainees.

Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Mastopexy.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-areola preservation positively impacts quality of life of the patients and helps them to achieve a better psychological and sexual well-being, as well as higher satisfaction with their reconstruction. Patients with large or ptotic breasts, however, represent a technical challenge to surgeons, and nipple-areola preservation may be deferred in this clinical scenario. The aim of this study is to report our experience in patients with large or ptotic breasts who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with immediate mastopexy. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed in all consecutive patients who underwent NSM and prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction, simultaneously with mastopexy. This procedure was offered preoperatively to patients who had ptotic or large breasts, which could benefit from mastopexy to obtain a better result. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated using a modified 5-point Likert scale, and satisfaction and quality of life were evaluated using the reconstruction module of the BREAST-Q questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventeen NSMs with simultaneous mastopexy were performed on 9 patients. All completed reconstruction successfully, and there were no cases of nipple ischemia or necrosis. Global aesthetic evaluation score was 3.77 (±0.95). The Q-scores were as follows: satisfaction with breast was 90, psychosocial well-being was 95, sexual well-being was 80, and physical well-being with chest was 86. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with large and/or ptotic breasts, NSM with prepectoral breast reconstruction and immediate mastopexy showed promising results. However, adequate preoperative planning and intraoperative flap assessment are necessary in order to minimize complications.

Microbiology of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Infections: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Postsurgical complications have been an increasing concern for hospitals, particularly in light of payment reform. The costs to the health care system are increasing in light of Medicare penalties for readmissions for certain conditions. Surgical site infection following implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) remains challenging. The rates of positive cultures and isolated microorganisms in IBR are unknown. This systematic review summarizes the reported microorganisms and positive culture rates in the existing literature. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the guidelines outlined in Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Articles were included if breast implant infection rates and culture results were reported. Further subgroup analysis of culture positive infections was performed. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were included, encompassing 25,177 IBR. Implant infections were reported in 1356 reconstructions (5.4%). Cultures were positive in 74.5% of infections. Gram-positive bacteria were the most common (68.6%), of which Staphylococcus species (51%) was the most isolated pathogen, followed by Pseudomonas. A subgroup analysis showed that early infections (63% vs 88%), radiotherapy (82% vs 93%), and acellular dermal matrix use (90% vs 100%) were associated with lower positive culture rates than their respective counterparts. Patients who received chemotherapy had higher positive culture results (94% vs 83%). Isolated microorganisms also varied among the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review outlines reported microorganisms in IBR. Staphylococcus species and Pseudomonas were the most frequently reported microorganism. Negative cultures were reported in up to 25.5% of infections. Patients with early infections, radiotherapy, and acellular dermal matrix demonstrated higher negative culture rates. This review can help guide the use of empirical antimicrobial therapy in IBR.