RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Entering dialysis is a critical moment in patients' healthcare journey, and little is known about drug therapy around it. A study funded by the Italian Medicines Agency offered the opportunity to leverage data from the Lazio Regional Dialysis and Transplant Registry (RRDTL) and perform an observational study on drug use patterns before and after initiating chronic dialysis. METHODS: Individuals initiating dialysis in 2016-2020 were identified from RRDTL, excluding patients with prior renal transplantation, stopping dialysis early, or dying within 12 months. Use of study drugs, predefined by clinicians, in the two years around the index date was retrieved from the drug claims register and described by semester. For each drug group, proportions of users (min 2 claims in 6 months) by semester, and intensity of treatment in terms of Defined Daily Doses (DDDs) for cardiovascular and antidiabetic agents were compared across semesters, stratifying by sex and age. RESULTS: In our cohort of 3,882 patients we observed a general increase in drug use after initiating dialysis, with the mean number rising from 5.5 to 6.2. Cardiovascular agents accounted for the highest proportions, along with proton pump inhibitors and antithrombotics over all semesters. Dialysis-specific therapies showed the most evident increase, in particular anti-anaemics (iron 4-fold, erythropoietins almost 2-fold), anti-parathyroids (6-fold), and chelating agents (4-fold). Use of cardiovascular and antidiabetic drugs was characterised by significant variations in terms of patterns and intensity, with some differences between sexes and age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Entering dialysis is associated with increased use of specific drugs and goes along with adaptations of chronic therapies.
Assuntos
Hipoglicemiantes , Diálise Renal , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Itália/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide and patient clinical outcomes seem influenced by their socioeconomic position (SEP). Since little has been investigated on this topic in the Italian context, our aim was to investigate the role of SEP in the care pathway of lung cancer patients in terms of diagnosis, treatment and mortality. METHODS: This observational retrospective cohort study included patients discharged in the Lazio Region with a lung cancer diagnosis between 2014 and 2017. In the main analysis, educational level was used as SEP measure. Multivariate models, adjusted for demographic and clinical variables, were applied to evaluate the association between SEP and study outcomes, stratified for metastatic (M) and non-metastatic (NM) cancer. We defined a diagnosis as 'delayed' when patients received their initial cancer diagnosis after an emergency department admission. Access to advanced lung cancer treatments (high-cost, novel and innovative treatments) and mortality were investigated within the 24-month period post-diagnosis. Moreover, two additional indicators of SEP were examined in the sensitivity analysis: one focusing on area deprivation and the other on income-based exemption. RESULTS: A total of 13,251 patients were identified (37.3% with metastasis). The majority were males (> 60%) and over half were older than 70 years. The distribution of SEP levels among patients was as follow: 31% low, 29% medium-low, 32% medium-high and 7% high. As SEP increased, the risks of receiving a delayed diagnosis ((high vs low: M: OR = 0.29 (0.23-0.38), NM: OR = 0.20 (0.16-0.25)) and of mortality ((high vs low M: OR = 0.77 (0.68-0.88) and NM: 0.61 (0.54-0.69)) decreased. Access to advanced lung cancer treatments increased in accordance with SEP only in the M cohort (high vs low: M: OR = 1.57 (1.18-2.09)). The primary findings were corroborated by sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlighted the need of public health preventive and educational programs in Italy, a country where the care pathway of lung cancer patients, especially in terms of diagnosis and mortality, appears to be negatively affected by SEP level.
Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Itália , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Disparidades Socioeconômicas em SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Very scanty evidence is available on factors influencing the choice of immunosuppressive drug therapy after kidney transplantation. METHODS: An Italian multiregional real-world study was conducted integrating national transplant information system and claims data. All patients undergoing kidney transplantation for the first time during 2009-2019 (incident patients) were considered. Multilevel logistic models were used to estimate Odds Ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% Confidence intervals. Factors with statistically significance were identified as characteristics associated with treatment regimens: cyclosporin-CsA vs tacrolimus-Tac and, within the latter group, mTOR inhibitors vs mycophenolate-MMF. RESULTS: We identified 3,622 kidney patients undergoing transplantation in 17 hospitals located in 4 Italian regions, 78.3% was treated with TAC-based therapy, of which 78% and 22% in combination with MMF and mTOR, respectively. For both comparison groups, the choice of immunosuppressive regimens was mostly guided by standard hospital practices. Only few recipient and donor characteristics were found associated with specific regimen (donor/receipt age, immunological risk and diabetes). CONCLUSIONS: The choice of post-renal transplant immunosuppressive therapy seems to be mostly driven by standard Centre practices, while only partially based on patient's characteristics and recognized international guidelines.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Rim , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Rejeição de Enxerto/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , TransplantadosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Infertility is a topic of growing interest, and female infertility is often treated with gonadotropins. Evidence regarding comparative safety and efficacy of different gonadotropin formulations is available from clinical studies, while real-world data are missing. The present study aims to investigate effectiveness and safety of treatment with different gonadotropin formulations in women undergoing medically assisted procreation treatments in Latium, a region in central Italy, through a real-world data approach. METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study in women between the ages of 18 and 45 years who were prescribed with at least one gonadotropin between 2007 and 2019 was conducted. Women were enrolled from the regional drug dispense registry, and data on their clinical history, exposure to therapeutic cycles (based on recombinant "REC" or extractives "EXT" gonadotropin, or combined protocol "CMD" (REC + EXT)), and maternal/infantile outcomes were linked from the regional healthcare administrative databases. Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to estimate the association between exposure and outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 90,292 therapeutic cycles prescribed to 35,899 women were linked to pregnancies. Overall, 15.8% of cycles successfully led to pregnancy. Compared to extractives, recombinant and combined treatments showed a stronger association with conception rate (RRREC adj = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12; RRCBD adj = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.11-1.24). Maternal outcomes occurred in less than 5% of deliveries, and no significant differences between treatments were observed (REC vs EXT, pre-eclampsia: RR adj = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.86-1.79, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: RR adj = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.59-2.65, gestational diabetes: RR adj = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.84-1.35). Regarding infantile outcomes, similar results were obtained for different gonadotropin formulations (REC vs EXT: low birth weight: RR adj = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.83-1.26, multiple births: RR adj = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.92-1.23, preterm birth: RR adj = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.26). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and safety profiles of REC proved to be similar to those of EXT. Regarding the efficacy in terms of conception rate and birth rate, protocols using the combined approach performed slightly better. Outcomes related to maternal and infantile safety were generally very rare, and safety features were overlapping between gonadotropin formulations.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Nascimento Prematuro , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Gonadotropinas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive lymphoma often refractory to currently available treatments (immuno-chemotherapy/autologous-stem-cell-transplantation-ASCT). Recently, new cell therapies have been approved for patients failing two conventional treatments, CAR-T (Chimeric-Antigen-Receptor-T-cell), committing payers in planning and implementing their use. We aim to define, using Real World Data (RWD), a reproducible procedure that allows identification of CAR-T target population for DLBCL. METHODS: Through the linking of electronic healthcare datasets (EHD), we identified patients with non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), resident in Lazio region (2010-2015), aged ≥20 years. DLBCL patients were followed using pathological anatomy (PA) reports, up to 3 years. To be defined as relapsed after two treatment lines, patients must have had new chemotherapy and/or NHL hospitalization after ASCT or at the end of the second chemotherapy. The incident rate of second relapse (R2-rate) was extended to the population without PA reports. RESULT: NHL incident patients were 7384, 68% presented a PA report and, 29% of these had DLBCL codes. Patients who relapsed after two treatment lines were 47 (39%) in the subgroup of patients who received ASCT and 138 (41%) in that with second chemotherapy treatment. Patients in the two subgroups were very different in terms of age and comorbidity. The annual incident number of DLBCL was estimated to be 329 which multiplied by R2-rate (13.7%) gives 45 patients per year eligible for CAR-T. DISCUSSION: This study shows how RWD allows the identification of a target population with new advanced therapies. This approach is rigorous, transparent and verifiable over time.
Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
AIM: In April 2017 the Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA) developed new criteria to grant any new medicinal product with an innovative designation. The aim of this study is to describe this new model and how it works. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive analysis was performed on the results of the assessment process of innovativeness of new medicinal products (or therapeutic indications) based on the AIFA's new innovation criteria (therapeutic need, added therapeutic value and quality of clinical evidence through GRADE methodology) carried out between April 2017 and February 2019 and made publicly available on the AIFA website starting from January 2018. RESULTS: A total of 37 full reports (22 for oncological indications) explaining the rationale for the AIFA's decision is made publicly available on the agency's website. A total of 12 therapeutic indications (5 oncological) were evaluated as fully innovative, 13 indications (11 oncological) were evaluated as conditionally innovative, while 12 indications (6 oncological) as non-innovative. CONCLUSION: The new AIFA innovation criteria resulted in a much more flexible and transparent model to define and assess what constitutes a therapeutic innovation. In particular, the choice of AIFA to use the GRADE methodology to evaluate the quality of clinical evidence within a process of drug innovativeness assessment is essential for the early identification of the discrepancy between the need for patients of a rapid access to innovative therapies and the available clinical data needed to make decisions on drug innovativeness.
Assuntos
Relatório de Pesquisa , Humanos , Itália , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To analyse the drug use pattern in women with psoriasis before, during and after pregnancy. METHODS: All children born (2009-2016) in a central Italian region (Lazio) to mothers with a diagnosis of psoriasis were identified. Drug use patterns (biologicals, systemic, and topical), and discontinuation and switching of drug therapies before, during, and after pregnancy were studied. Findings were compared with data from a population exposed to similar drug therapies (eg, antirheumatic drugs). RESULTS: Among 3499 deliveries by women affected by psoriasis, 1876 (53.6%) were diagnosed with this condition before the Last Menstrual Period (LMP). Of these, 525 (27.9%) had at least one drug prescription for psoriasis therapy during 6 months before LMP. For each class of drugs considered, there was a general decrease in its use during pregnancy. Considering the two trimesters preceding LMP and the three trimesters of pregnancy, the following percentages of prescriptions were observed: from 10.5% to 0% for biologicals, 7.2% to 2.5% for the conventional systemic drugs, and 51.1% to 9.4% for the topical treatments. After delivery, previous treatments were resumed. Similar results were observed for rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic condition. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of drugs come with warnings regarding potential embryo-fetotoxicity, which might play a role in the decision to continue treatments during pregnancy. According to our study pregnancy appears to have a significant influence on drug prescriptions of different pharmacological treatments for psoriasis.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/administração & dosagem , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Parto Obstétrico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in psoriasis has been associated with an increased risk of serious infections compared with nonbiologic systemic therapies. OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify the risk of: (1) serious infections (leading to hospitalization, sequelae, or death); and (2) "any infection," bacterial cutaneous infections, and granulomatous infections among patients receiving anti-TNF therapy compared with nonbiologics (acitretin, methotrexate, cyclosporine). METHODS: We used prospective meta-analysis to combine data from the Psocare registry (Italy), Biobadaderm registry (Spain), and Clalit Health Services database (Israel), including 17,739 patients and 23,357.5 person-years of follow-up. RESULTS: For serious infections, age, gender, and Charlson morbidity index adjusted hazard ratio of exposure to anti-TNFs compared with nonbiologics was 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.80-1.19), for bacterial cutaneous infections it was 1.00 (95% confidence interval 0.62-1.61), and for granulomatous infections it was 1.23 (95% confidence interval 0.82-1.84). Using methotrexate as comparator and comparing first year of exposure with later exposure did not modify the results. For any infectious episode, risks and relative risks were heterogeneous among registries, probably because of different definitions of outcome. LIMITATIONS: There was lack of power to describe risk of single drugs. CONCLUSION: In current clinical practice, treatment with anti-TNF drugs was not associated with a higher risk of serious infections than treatment with nonbiologic systemic therapy.
Assuntos
Infecções/induzido quimicamente , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/induzido quimicamente , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Granuloma/induzido quimicamente , Granuloma/microbiologia , Humanos , Infecções/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The new call on independent research on drugs issued in October 2016 by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) explicitly reported that proposals based on systematic reviews were not admissible, and no justification or explanation for this choice was given. Prompted by this policy decision, here, we briefly discuss the potential usefulness of systematic reviews in responding to regulatory needs. First, systematic reviews, by collecting, analysing and critically appraising all relevant studies on a specific topic, may be used by different stakeholders as a basis for making clinical and policy recommendations, including regulatory recommendations. Second, systematic reviews may advance knowledge as primary clinical research does. Third, systematic reviews may be particularly useful to detect signals of unknown adverse effects. Fourth, systematic reviews may be used to identify knowledge gaps. PROPOSAL: Systematic reviews may simultaneously produce new findings and summarize existing knowledge, with the potential of informing regulatory decisions more pragmatically and more rapidly than other research designs. We suggest that national and international calls on independent research on drugs should not put primary clinical research against systematic reviews, as it implies a focus on the methods instead of on the questions being asked. As most calls only broadly define the research areas and the topics to be covered, we argue that it should be up to the applicant to make a proposal on which design provides the most valid and useful answer, and up to the assessors to carefully check the validity, feasibility and relevance of such a proposal.
Assuntos
Legislação de Medicamentos , ItáliaAssuntos
Betacoronavirus , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Saúde Pública , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19/terapia , Disseminação de Informação , Pandemias , Editoração , SARS-CoV-2 , Terapias em Estudo , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Reposicionamento de Medicamentos , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Uso Off-Label , Revisão da Pesquisa por ParesRESUMO
Ageing is doubtless a factor characterizing population in Europe, and particularly in Emilia-Romagna, a north-east Italian region of about 4,5 million people. From 1990 to 2010 life expectancy in Emilia-Romagna has grown by about 6 years for men and 5 for women. At the same time good health life expectancy has grown even more rapidly, particularly among women. While it is expected that in 2030 the number of over-65s will have exceeded one million people, the trends in good health life expectancy is not granted. Strengthen actions aimed at increasing good health conditions promotes ageing sustainability and can feed the positive trend observed for the life expectancy in good health. The Emilia-Romagna Region takes up the demographic challenge of the coming years in the European context and promotes strategies for active and healthy ageing, working on prevention in its broadest sense and for the entire life span, with the aim of actively contribute to the achievement of the EU2020 target of an increase of two years in life expectancy in good health of European citizens.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Nível de Saúde , Expectativa de Vida/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , União Europeia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Morbidade/tendências , Mortalidade/tendências , Dinâmica Populacional , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) infections may lead to severe consequences in infants born preterm with breathing problems (such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)) or congenital heart diseases (CHD). Since studies investigating the influence of different gestational age (WGA) and concomitant specific comorbidities on the burden of RSV infections are scarce, the present study aimed to better characterize these high-risk populations in the Italian context. METHODS: This retrospective, longitudinal and record-linkage cohort study involved infants born between 2017 and 2019 in Lazio Region (Italy) and is based on data extracted from administrative databases. Each infant was exclusively included in one of the following cohorts: (1) BPD-RDS (WGA ≤35 with or without CHD) or (2) CHD (without BPD and/or RDS) or (3) Preterm (WGA ≤35 without BPD (and/or RDS) or CHD). Each cohort was followed for 12 months from birth. Information related to sociodemographic at birth, and RSV and Undetermined Respiratory Agents (URA) hospitalizations and drug consumption at follow-up were retrieved and described. RESULTS: A total of 8,196 infants were selected and classified as 1,084 BPD-RDS, 3,286 CHD and 3,826 Preterm. More than 30% of the BPD-RDS cohort was composed by early preterm infants (WGA ≤ 29) in contrast to the Preterm cohort predominantly constitute by moderate preterm infants (98.2%), while CHD infants were primarily born at term (83.9%). At follow-up, despite the cohorts showed similar proportions of RSV hospitalizations, in BPD-RDS cohort hospitalizations were more frequently severe compared to those occurred in the Preterm cohort (p<0.01), in the BPD-RDS cohort was also found the highest proportion of URA hospitalizations (p<0.0001). In addition, BPD-RDS infants, compared to those of the remaining cohorts, received more frequently prophylaxis with palivizumab (p<0.0001) and were more frequently treated with adrenergics inhalants, and glucocorticoids for systemic use. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of the study clinical outcomes highlighted that, the demographic and clinical characteristics at birth of the study cohorts influence their level of vulnerability to RSV and URA infections. As such, continuous monitoring of these populations is necessary in order to ensure a timely organization of health care system able to respond to their needs in the future.
Assuntos
Displasia Broncopulmonar , Cardiopatias Congênitas , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/prevenção & controle , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Palivizumab/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização , Cardiopatias Congênitas/epidemiologia , Displasia Broncopulmonar/epidemiologia , Antivirais/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Background: In the context of a comparative study of efficacy and safety of drugs used in rare neuromuscular and neurodegenerative diseases (CAESAR-call AIFA_FV_2012-13-14), we assessed the use patterns of drugs indicated for myasthenia gravis (MG). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on administrative healthcare data. For a cohort of MG patients, prevalent and incident use of pyridostigmine (Py) and other indicated drugs in the first year after case identification was evaluated. Prevalent combined use of major therapies (azathioprine (Az), prednisone (Pr), vitamin D (Vd)) stratified by Py use was assessed, and a comparison between therapies at the time of MG identification and during the first year of follow-up was performed. Results: We included 2369 MG patients between 2013 and 2019. Among them, prevalent and incident Py users were 38.4% and 22.0%, respectively. In the first year of follow-up, the use of Pr was observed in 74.5% of Py prevalent users and in 82.0% of Py incident users, respectively; the use of Az was observed in 24.9% and 23.0%, respectively; and the use of Vd was observed in 53.3% and 48.2%, respectively. Among 910 Py prevalent users, 13.1% also used Az, Pr, and Vd, while 15.3% used none of these. Among 938 non-Py users, 2.7% used Az, Pr, and Vd, while 53.8% used none of these. During the first year, an increase in combined therapies was evident in incident Py users. Conclusions: Our results suggest that, for some MG patients, there may be a need for treatments that combine a rapid onset of benefit with long-term and consistent disease control. These issues may be addressed by the new treatments currently being developed. To date, more studies are needed to address the heterogeneity, quality, and generalizability of the existing data and to evaluate patterns of use, efficacy, and safety of new or emerging therapies for MG.
RESUMO
Purpose: This study evaluates the use, benefit-risk profile, and economic impact of generic immunosuppressants (tacrolimus-TAC, cyclosporine-CsA, and mycophenolate-MYC) in kidney and liver transplant recipients compared to brand-name drugs. Patients and Methods: A retrospective multicentre observational study, involving four Italian regions, was conducted based on the national transplant Information system and regional healthcare claims data. The analysis focused on incident patients who received kidney and liver transplants between 2013 and 2019 and evaluated the use of generic of CsA, TAC, and MYC during the 30-day period following discharge. For each type of transplant and immunosuppressive agent, the benefit-risk profile of generic vs branded drugs in a two-year window was estimated by multivariate Cox models (HR; 95% CI). Furthermore, the potential cost savings per person associated with one year of treatment using generics were calculated. Results: The utilization of generic drugs showed a significant increase; over the study years, the proportion of users among kidney recipients ranged from 14.2% to 40.5% for TAC, from 36.9% to 56.7% for MYC, and from 18.2% to 94.7% for CsA. A great variability in generic uptake for region was found. A comparable risk-benefit profile between generic and branded formulations was shown for all immunosuppressors considered. Choosing generic immunosuppressants during maintenance could result in yearly savings of around 2000 euros per person for each therapy ingredient. Conclusion: The study shows an increasing proportion of patients using generic immunosuppressive drugs over time suggesting a growing acceptance of generics within the transplant community and reveals comparable risk-benefit profiles between the generic and branded formulations of TAC, CsA, and MYC. A significant variability in the use of generics immunosuppressive agents was found both at the regional level and among transplant centers and future research should delve into regional prescribing variations.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Ciclosporina , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapêutico , Rejeição de Enxerto , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Fígado , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
The post-organ transplant immunosuppressive therapy includes the administration of tacrolimus (Tac) or cyclosporine (CsA), along with antimetabolites (Antim) or mTOR inhibitors, with or without prednisone. A survey was conducted to investigate clinical experience regarding the use, efficacy, safety profile, and determinants of choice of maintenance immunosuppressive therapies. The questionnaire was sent to healthcare workers of 45 transplant centers specializing in kidney (K), liver (L), heart (H), and lung (P) transplants. Seventy-one responses were received from 15 Italian regions. The indicated first-choice therapy was Tac + Antim, except in the hepatic field where Tac monotherapy was favored. According to 44.1% of respondents, the first-choice therapy has changed over the last 15 years due to the replacement of CsA with Tac and increased use of mTOR inhibitors. Regarding the determinants of the index therapy, the choice of schemes to be applied depends mainly on international guidelines, previous experience, and internal protocols within the facility (80.3%; 54.9%; 50.7%, respectively). Compared to standard therapy, the criteria guiding the prescription of different therapies mainly involve the presence of comorbidities (K: 81.3%; L: 88.2%; H: 73.3%; P: 85.7%) and the evaluation of specific clinical parameters of the recipient. Additionally, the majority of respondents are in favor of using generic versions where available. The survey reveals dimensions not detectable by current healthcare administrative flows; such integrations provide a broader picture of the factors influencing the choice of post-transplant immunosuppressive therapeutic schemes.
Assuntos
Ciclosporina , Imunossupressores , Transplante de Órgãos , Tacrolimo , Humanos , Itália , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ciclosporina/administração & dosagem , Tacrolimo/administração & dosagem , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMO
Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy used in kidney transplantation typically involves calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus or cyclosporine, in combination with mycophenolate or mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTORi) with or without corticosteroids. An Italian retrospective multicentre observational study was conducted to investigate the risk-benefit profile of different immunosuppressive regimens. We identified all subjects who underwent kidney transplant between 2009 and 2019, using healthcare claims data. Patients on cyclosporine and tacrolimus-based therapies were matched 1:1 based on propensity score, and effectiveness and safety outcomes were compared using Cox models (HR; 95%CI). Analyses were also conducted comparing mTORi versus mycophenolate among tacrolimus-treated patients. Patients treated with cyclosporine had a higher risk of rejection or graft loss (HR:1.69; 95%CI:1.16-2.46) and a higher incidence of severe infections (1.25;1.00-1.55), but a lower risk of diabetes (0.66;0.47-0.91) compared to those treated with tacrolimus. Among tacrolimus users, mTORi showed non-inferiority to MMF in terms of mortality (1.01;0.68-1.62), reject/graft loss (0.61;0.36-1.04) and severe infections (0.76;0.56-1.03). In a real-life setting, tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy appeared to be superior to cyclosporine in reducing rejection and severe infections, albeit with an associated increased risk of diabetes. The combination of tacrolimus and mTORi may represent a valid alternative to the combination with mycophenolate, although further studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Assuntos
Imunossupressores , Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Ciclosporina/efeitos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Ácido Micofenólico/efeitos adversos , Tacrolimo/efeitos adversosRESUMO
In Italy, over the past 10 years, we have had a proliferation of registers associated with the reimbursement of drugs by the National Health Service. The regulatory path that made them grow comes from the so-called "note limitative" and treatment plans associated with the use of certain drugs. From these experiences different types of registries have been created that collect, at the time of prescription, information about the safety and appropriateness of use of medication where a benefit-risk profile in the general population is still not well defined. The critical analysis of some of these experiences can present positive and negative aspects associated with a regulatory reality now used in clinical practice nationwide.