Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Ghana Med J ; 52(1): 15-21, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30013256

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Metered dose inhalers are cornerstone in effective management of bronchial asthma when correctly used. Most studies hitherto have focused on assessing patient's knowledge of inhaler technique. We sought to assess the knowledge of inhaler technique, spacer device and peak flow meter among doctors and nurses in a tertiary healthcare institution in Nigeria. METHOD: A cross sectional survey of nurses and doctors from emergency department, family and internal medicine; who were attending a continuous professional development lecture, was carried out. From a total of 100 questionnaires administered, we retrieved 87 of which 75 were completed, giving a response rate of 75%. It was a self-administered questionnaire. Data was analysed with SPSS version 21.0. Descriptive statistics were done. Association was examined using chi-square test. RESULT: Mean age of respondent was 35.8 years ± 8.7, 47(62.7%) were < 40 years, 33(44%) were male, nurses were 30(40.0%). Only 28(37.3%) had ever used a peak flow meter. Only 4(14.3%) used peak flow meter frequently, while 12(26.7%) checked patient's inhaler technique often. Only 9 out of the 75 (12%) participants all of who are doctors knew at least 3 essential steps of the techniques in using the metered dose inhaler correctly. None of the participants got all the steps for the use of pMDI totally correct. CONCLUSION: Knowledge regarding the use of the metered dose inhaler and spacer device was poor. Health practitioners should have constant reminders in the form of continuous medical education to update their knowledge regarding correct inhaler technique. FUNDING: self-funded.


Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Inaladores Dosimetrados , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Médicos , Administração por Inalação , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nigéria , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 14(5): 714-721, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28244800

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Black Africans have reduced FVC compared with white persons, but the prevalence and determinants of reduced values are not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence and factors leading to reduced FVC in a Nigerian population and to examine current theories regarding the determinants of this difference. METHODS: We studied the ventilatory function of 883 adults aged 40 years or older participating in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease Study in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Respondents completed pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry test and provided information on their smoking history, respiratory symptoms, risk factors, and diagnoses, including anthropometric details. We used standard categories to define body mass index as either underweight, normal, overweight, or obese. We defined reduced FVC as a post-bronchodilator FVC below the lower limit of normal using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) equations, Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 equations, and local reference equations based on nonsmoking study participants without a respiratory diagnosis. We fit multivariate linear regression models to FVC as a continuous measure, adjusting for age, sex, height, and other confounders. RESULTS: The prevalence of reduced FVC was 70.4% for men and 72.8% for women when using NHANES values for white Americans, 17.8% for men and 14.4% for women using NHANES equations for African Americans, and 15.5% for men and 20.5% for women using the Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 equations. Using the equations derived from nonsmoking respondents in the survey without a respiratory diagnosis, the prevalence of reduced FVC was less than 4% for both men and women. FVC was lower in participants who had less than 7 years of education (FVC, -96 ml; 95% confidence interval [CI], -172 to -19), were underweight (FVC, -269 ml; 95% CI, -464 to -73), were overweight (FVC, -132 ml; 95% CI, -219 to -46), and were obese (FVC, -222 ml; 95% CI, -332 to -112). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variation in the prevalence of reduced FVC based on the reference standard used. This variation is not satisfactorily explained by factors thought to affect FVC within individual populations. However, the prevalence strongly associates with both education level and body mass index in this population, regardless of the specific standard used.


Assuntos
População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etnologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Capacidade Vital , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Prevalência , Valores de Referência , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Espirometria , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Respir Med ; 130: 61-68, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29206635

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We examined the association of respiratory symptoms, health status, and lung function with the use of solid fuel (wood, charcoal, coal or crop residue) for cooking or heating in a predominantly non-smoking population. METHODS: Using the protocol of the Burden of Obstructive Lung Diseases (BOLD) initiative, we collected representative population data using questionnaires and spirometry tests. We categorized solid fuel use into 'never user', 'ex user' and 'current user' based on responses to the survey. We developed regression models to evaluate the relation between use of solid fuel and the prevalence of respiratory symptoms, quality of life and lung function adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: Out of 1147 respondents with complete information on domestic fuel type, 33% were 'never-users', 19% were 'ex-users' while 48% reported current use of solid fuel for domestic cooking and/or indoor heating. Compared with never-users, current solid fuel users were more likely to report cough (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.0, 2.9), cough or phlegm (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.0, 2.5) and the association was stronger among women (OR: 3.0, 95% CI: 1.3, 7.1 and OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.1, 5.2, respectively). Current solid fuel users also had lower mental health status (coefficient: ?1.5, 95% CI: ?2.8, - 0.2) compared with the group of never-users. Current or previous domestic use of solid fuels for cooking or heating was not associated with higher prevalence of chronic airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC < LLN). CONCLUSIONS: Using solid fuel for domestic cooking or heating was associated with a higher risk of cough or phlegm and a lower mental quality of life. However we found no significant effect in the prevalence of chronic airflow obstruction in Ife, Nigeria.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Carvão Mineral/efeitos adversos , Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Doenças Respiratórias/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Carvão Mineral/estatística & dados numéricos , Culinária/estatística & dados numéricos , Tosse/epidemiologia , Tosse/etiologia , Tosse/fisiopatologia , Tosse/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Calefação/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Testes de Função Respiratória/métodos , Doenças Respiratórias/etiologia , Doenças Respiratórias/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA