RESUMO
Visual field assessment is an important clinical evaluation for eye disease and neurological injury. We evaluated Octopus semi-automated kinetic peripheral perimetry (SKP) and Humphrey static automated central perimetry for detection of neurological visual field loss in patients with pituitary disease. We carried out a prospective cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study comparing Humphrey central 30-2 SITA threshold programme with a screening protocol for SKP on Octopus perimetry. Humphrey 24-2 data were extracted from 30-2 results. Results were independently graded for presence/absence of field defect plus severity of defect. Fifty patients (100 eyes) were recruited (25 males and 25 females), with mean age of 52.4 years (SD = 15.7). Order of perimeter assessment (Humphrey/Octopus first) and order of eye tested (right/left first) were randomised. The 30-2 programme detected visual field loss in 85%, the 24-2 programme in 80%, and the Octopus combined kinetic/static strategy in 100% of eyes. Peripheral visual field loss was missed by central threshold assessment. Qualitative comparison of type of visual field defect demonstrated a match between Humphrey and Octopus results in 58%, with a match for severity of defect in 50%. Tests duration was 9.34 minutes (SD = 2.02) for Humphrey 30-2 versus 10.79 minutes (SD = 4.06) for Octopus perimetry. Octopus semi-automated kinetic perimetry was found to be superior to central static testing for detection of pituitary disease-related visual field loss. Where reliant on Humphrey central static perimetry, the 30-2 programme is recommended over the 24-2 programme. Where kinetic perimetry is available, this is preferable to central static programmes for increased detection of peripheral visual field loss.
RESUMO
This review aims to develop an evidence-based pathway for isolated adult orbital blowout fractures. Evaluation of assessment methods, outcome measures, imaging modalities, and crucially, the optimal timing of surgical intervention was critically examined to develop a clinically applicable care pathway. A literature search was carried out using Scopus, PubMed and Web of Knowledge. The literature favors the use of HAR% ratio, Field of Binocular Single Vision (FOBSV) and Exophthalmometer as the core tests that should form part of the standardized assessment for blow-out fractures (BOFs). CT imaging remains gold standard, particularly to identify 'red-flags' warranting early intervention. There was some disagreement in relation to timing of intervention in adult fractures who continue to be symptomatic without initial extraocular muscle (EOM) entrapment and enophthalmos >3 mm, where early intervention within two weeks is not indicated. The limited literature available agreed that successful functional and radiological outcomes can be achieved with conservative or late surgical management following an extended observational period of four weeks, opposed to the conventional two weeks. An evidence-based care pathway has been created, confidently including the initial assessment methods, imaging modality, and the criteria for observation. A four-week observational period has been advocated due to evidence suggesting that there is no significant difference in outcomes from two-week observation, plus with careful functional evaluation, surgery may be avoided in some cases.