End-of-life care and advance care planning for outpatients with inoperable aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: A significant proportion of patients with abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms (AA) do not proceed to intervention after reaching treatment threshold diameter due to a combination of poor cardiovascular reserve, frailty, and aortic morphology. This patient cohort has a high mortality; however, until this study, there exist no studies on the end-of-life care conservatively managed patients receive. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 220 conservatively managed patients with AA referred to Leeds Vascular Institute (UK) and Maastricht University Medical Centre (the Netherlands) for intervention between 2017 and 2021. Demographic details, mortality, cause of death, advance care planning and palliative care outcomes were analysed to examine predictors of palliative care referral and efficacy of palliative care consultation. RESULTS: A total of 1506 patients with AA were seen over this time period, giving a nonintervention rate of 15%. There was a 3-year mortality rate of 55%, a median survival of 364 days, and rupture was the reported cause of death in 18% of the decedents. Median follow-up was 34 months. Only 8% of all patients and 16% of decedents received a palliative care consultation, which took place a median of 3.5 days before death. Patients >81 years of age were more likely to have advance care planning. Only 5% and 23% of conservatively managed patients had documentation of preferred place of death and care priorities respectively. Patients with a palliative care consultation were more likely to have these services in place. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small proportion of conservatively treated patients had advance care planning and this was far below international guidelines on end-of-life care for adults, which recommends it for each of these patients. Pathways and guidance should be implemented to ensure patients not offered AA intervention receive end-of-life care and advance care planning.

Robotic-assisted MIDCAB procedure through a minithoracotomy: Step-by-step instructions.

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has evolved in recent years. Complex minimally invasive surgical techniques can further reduce the morbidity associated with surgical coronary bypass grafting. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting is an effective and safe procedure in all risk groups. More experience with this procedure over the coming years should lead to the implementation of guidelines and the incorporation in heart-team decisions of schemes for individual patient care. We present a young male patient with familial hypercholesterolemia and chronic total occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) treated in January 2021 with a robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft through a minithoracotomy. The procedure was. The patient showed a fast recovery from the uncomplicated procedure and was discharged from the hospital after 3 days. We prepared this case report to facilitate training for this complex technical procedure. Robotic-assisted MIDCAB through a minithoracotomy is a technically demanding but safe minimally invasive alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe coronary lesions not suitable for percutaneous coronary intervention. In a hybrid coronary revascularization strategy, this technique minimizes surgical risk and optimizes long-term outcomes with high patency of surgical grafts.