Validation of surgical site infection surveillance in orthopedic procedures.

BACKGROUND: Valid data are essential for a national surveillance system of nosocomial infections. METHODS: In 8 hospitals conducting surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance for orthopedic procedures, a validation team performed a blinded retrospective chart review (10 operations with reported infections, 40 without) and interviewed infection control nurses. RESULTS: In total, 397 patient charts were reviewed. Positive and negative predictive values for routine surveillance were 94% (95% CI: 89%-99%) and 99% (95% CI: 99%-100%), respectively. When these results were applied to the aggregated surveillance data (403 infections, 10,068 noninfections), sensitivity was 75% (95% CI: 56%-93%) and specificity 100% (95% CI: 97%-100%). The following case finding methods were used: ward visits (in 7/8 hospitals), microbiology reports (5/8), ward notifications by link nurses (8/8), and other nursing (7/8) and medical (5/8) staff. The wound culture rate ranged from 9 to 67 per 1000 patient-days. All hospitals carried out postdischarge surveillance on readmission and all but 1 at follow-up visits and by an additional questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Most SSIs reported by the hospitals were true infections, showing that, when an SSI was reported, the definitions were correctly implemented. Some SSIs were missed, which might be due to weaknesses in case finding. Variation in diagnostic practices may also affect SSI rates.

Microbiological efficacy and tolerability of a new, non-alcohol-based hand disinfectant.

OBJECTIVE: Alcohol-based hand disinfectants are widely used in hospitals. Occasionally, there is a need for non-alcohol-based products, but alternatives have been scarce. We studied the microbiological efficacy and tolerability of a water-based hand disinfectant for healthcare workers. DESIGN: A water-based hand disinfectant was introduced as the only hand disinfectant in 5 wards in Turku University Hospital, Finland. Ninety-nine healthcare workers participated in fingerprint sampling during the 7-week study period. In another ward, 26 healthcare workers who were using alcohol-based hand disinfectant acted as control subjects for the skin reaction studies. The water-based product was tested in the laboratory according to the European standard EN 12791. We obtained 292 fingerprint samples before disinfection and 302 after disinfection. The opinions of healthcare workers were collected by use of a questionnaire, and skin reactions were assessed subjectively by use of questionnaires and objectively by measuring moisture and transepidermal water loss. RESULTS: When tested in accordance with the European standard, the product met the requirements for short-term and long-term efficacy. The results of the fingerprint test showed that there was a statistically significant decrease in colonization of the fingertips before and after disinfection (P<.001). The users of the water-based hand disinfectant reported dry skin more often than did control subjects, but visual inspection and the results of the moisture measurement showed no difference between the users of the water-based hand disinfectant and the control subjects. Transepidermal water loss measurement also showed no deterioration of skin condition. CONCLUSIONS: The water-based hand disinfectant was shown to be an effective hand disinfectant that caused relatively little skin irritation and can serve as a hand hygiene alternative in situations in which alcohol-based disinfectant cannot be used.

Staphylococcus aureus colonization among nursing home residents in a large Finnish nursing home.

We studied colonization with methicillin-resistant and -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, MSSA) in the second largest nursing home in Finland, in which the residents volunteered had their nostrils, throats, perineums, skin lesions, and catheter exit sites swabbed, and catheter urines cultured. The specimens were cultured onto non-selective and selective agar, with or without enrichment in salt-containing trypticase soy broth (TSB). S. aureus was identified by routine methods, methicillin resistance was detected by oxacillin and cefoxitin disk diffusion and MIC E-tests, and GenoType MRSA -test was used for mecA gene confirmation. A total of 663 cultures were obtained from 213 residents. Of those, 165 specimens (25%) from 94 residents (44%) were positive for S. aureus, and 3 specimens (0.4%) from 2 (0.9%) residents were positive for MRSA. Of the 165 S. aureus isolates, 31 (19%) from 25 (27%) residents were found only from sites other than nostrils (30 MSSA and 1 MRSA). TSB enrichment detected additional 33 (5%) S. aureus isolates (32 MSSA and 1 MRSA), resulting in 8 (5%) additional residents. None of the MRSA strains would have been found if only nostrils and throat had been screened, and no enrichment broth had been used.

Molecular epidemiology of an outbreak caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a health care ward and associated nursing home.

Our point-prevalence survey followed an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a long-term care facility and identified five MRSA strains, of which two possessed an outbreak genotype not encountered previously and three had another profile. All of them possessed SCCmec type V. Six methicillin-sensitive S. aureus strains were genotypically related to the epidemic strains.