RESUMO
In this study, we aimed to develop a new automated method for kidney volume measurement in children using ultrasonography (US) with image pre-processing and hybrid learning and to formulate an equation to calculate the expected kidney volume. The volumes of 282 kidneys (141 subjects, <19 years old) with normal function and structure were measured using US. The volumes of 58 kidneys in 29 subjects who underwent US and computed tomography (CT) were determined by image segmentation and compared to those calculated by the conventional ellipsoidal method and CT using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). An expected kidney volume equation was developed using multivariate regression analysis. Manual image segmentation was automated using hybrid learning to calculate the kidney volume. The ICCs for volume determined by image segmentation and ellipsoidal method were significantly different, while that for volume calculated by hybrid learning was significantly higher than that for ellipsoidal method. Volume determined by image segmentation was significantly correlated with weight, body surface area, and height. Expected kidney volume was calculated as (2.22 × weight (kg) + 0.252 × height (cm) + 5.138). This method will be valuable in establishing an age-matched normal kidney growth chart through the accumulation and analysis of large-scale data.
Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: There has been little progress in research on the best anatomical position for effective chest compressions and cardiac function during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This study aimed to divide the left ventricle (LV) into segments to determine the best position for effective chest compressions using the LV systolic function seen during CPR. METHODS: We used transesophageal echocardiography images acquired during CPR. A deep neural network with an attention mechanism and a residual feature aggregation module were applied to the images to segment the LV. The results were compared between the proposed model and U-Net. RESULTS: The results of the proposed model showed higher performance in most metrics when compared to U-Net: dice coefficient (0.899±0.017 vs. 0.792±0.027, p<0.05); intersection of union (0.822±0.026 vs. 0.668±0.034, p<0.05); recall (0.904±0.023 vs. 0.757±0.037, p<0.05); precision (0.901±0.021 vs. 0.859±0.034, p>0.05). There was a significant difference between the proposed model and U-Net. CONCLUSION: Compared to U-Net, the proposed model showed better performance for all metrics. This model would allow us to evaluate the systolic function of the heart during CPR in greater detail by segmenting the LV more accurately.