RESUMO
Background: The mental health of healthcare workers, particularly family medicine residents, is an area of growing concern, more so in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. High levels of burnout and depression among these professionals can affect their well-being and patients' quality of care. Objectives: The study aimed to determine the prevalence of depression and burnout among family medicine residents in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 213 family medicine residents, using a self-administered survey. The survey included the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 to assess burnout and depression. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participants' characteristics, and regression model was developed to explore predictors of burnout and depression. Results: The mean age of participants was 26.85±1.42 years, and 53.3% were males. The study found a high prevalence of emotional exhaustion (EE) and depersonalization (DP) among participants, with mean scores of 21.10±9.38 and 15.44±7.69, respectively, indicating moderate to high levels. Similarly, a high level of personal accomplishment (PA) was reported, with a mean score of 11.46±6.33. Around 10% of participants reported moderately severe and severe depression, with a mean PHQ-9 scale score of 6.03±5.10. Gender and depression severity were significantly associated with burnout (p=0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The study underscores a significant prevalence of burnout and depression among family medicine residents in Riyadh, with notable variations across different demographic and professional characteristics. This necessitates tailored mental health interventions for this population, especially in challenging times like the ongoing pandemic.
RESUMO
Background Adiposity is firmly linked to a higher incidence of various cardiovascular and metabolic morbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, and thromboembolism. This research study was aimed to verify the association of increased adiposity and hyperreactivity of platelets in obese and non-obese individuals. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted on 42 subjects aged 18 years and above. Subjects were divided into obese and non-obese groups based on their body mass index (BMI). The data was collected through self-administered questionnaires. All participants underwent body composition analysis. Blood samples were collected from all subjects and taken to the Pharmacology Department for the preparation of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and poor platelet plasma (PPP). Platelet aggregation was induced by arachidonic acid and was monitored with a Bio/Data multichannel aggregation profiler (Bio/Data Corp., Horsham, PA, USA). Results Significant differences were observed in most parameters, such as fat mass, body fat percentage, free fat mass (FFM), the percentage of trunk fat, total body water, waist-hip ratio (WHR), and basal metabolic rate (BMR) of obese and non-obese subjects. The average percent of platelet aggregation in obese and non-obese subjects was 56.33 ± 15.62 and 59.38 ± 12.62, respectively. The average area under the curve (AUC) for platelet aggregation for both groups was 339.33 ± 191.55 and 342 ± 146.68, respectively. Platelet function was not significantly different and didn't positively correlate with most parameters of the body composition, except WHR, which positively correlated with AUC for platelet function. Conclusion There was no significant direct correlation between adiposity and platelet activation in obese subjects. However, a significant positive correlation of AUC for platelet aggregation with WHR was observed (resistance (r)-value: 0.307, p < 0.05). These findings suggest that WHR could be an effective determinant to assess the risk of thromboembolism in obese individuals.