The relations between real-time use of emotion regulation strategies and anxiety and depression symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: How individuals differentially implement specific emotion regulation (ER) strategies is a critical indicator of the progression of depressive and anxiety disorders. Symptoms of anxiety and depression may be associated with differences in ER, but little evidence to date had examined whether anxiety and depression were associated with individual differences in the real-time use of ER strategies. METHODS: This study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in two samples (n = 276) of undergraduate students from a single university who were assessed for 8-10 days. Baseline surveys captured participant self-reported anxiety symptoms and depressive symptoms using the PROMIS-Anxiety scale and the PROMIS-Depression scale, respectively. We measured ER through EMA-adapted prompts from the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), which participants received on their internet-enabled cell phones. In pre-registered analyses, we tested the associations between anxiety symptoms with the use of discrete ER strategies in EMA using generalized estimating equations with a log-link function to account for nesting of EMA observations within participants, and further tested whether the findings generalized to depression (not pre-registered). RESULTS: Symptoms of anxiety and depression were associated with greater odds of using both maladaptive and adaptive ER strategy use during the EMA period, and with lower odds of reporting no strategy use. Moreover, associations were generally stronger for maladaptive than adaptive ER strategies. CONCLUSION: Anxiety and depressive symptoms are related to increased regulatory efforts overall, and results suggest that individuals with anxiety and depressive symptoms may be especially prone to use maladaptive ER strategies. Tracking ER strategies in a natural environment can further inform our understanding of how anxious and depressed individuals attempt to regulate emotions.

Safer-use strategies in the context of harm-reduction treatment for people experiencing homelessness and alcohol use disorder.

BACKGROUND: Two, randomized controlled trials found harm-reduction treatment for AUD (HaRT-A) improves alcohol outcomes for adults experiencing homelessness. HaRT-A, which neither requires nor precludes abstinence, entails tracking alcohol-related harm, harm-reduction goals, and safer-use strategies. This secondary dual study qualitatively describes this last component, safer-use strategies, and their quantitative association with treatment outcomes. METHODS: Participants were people who experienced homelessness and AUD and were enrolled in the active HaRT-A treatment arms in 2 randomized control trials (Trial 1 N = 86; Trial 2 N = 208). Trial 1was a 2-arm study with randomization to HaRT-A or services as usual. Trial 2 was a 4-arm study combining HaRT-A and extended release naltrexone. In HaRT-A sessions, participants received a list of 3 categories of safer-use strategies (i.e., buffering alcohol's effects on the body, changing the manner of drinking to be safer and healthier, and reducing alcohol use). Mixed methods were used to qualitatively describe safer-use strategies implemented and quantitatively test their association with alcohol outcomes (i.e., peak quantity, frequency, alcohol-related harm). RESULTS: In Trial 1, but not Trial 2, participants committed to more safer-use strategies across time, which was associated with reductions in alcohol frequency over the past 30 days. In both trials, participants committing to reducing alcohol consumption drank on a quarter fewer days overall, and in Trial 2, experienced 15 % less alcohol-related harm. In Trial 1, participants who committed to changing the manner of drinking were heavier drinkers overall, and although they showed significant reductions in alcohol-related harm, their reduction rate was slower than for participants who selected other strategies. In Trial 2, strategies to buffer alcohol's effects were associated with a monthly 14 % decrease of alcohol-related harm. CONCLUSION: This study replicated prior findings that people experiencing homelessness and AUD regularly adopt strategies to reduce alcohol-related harm. The implementation of safer-use strategies was favorably associated with alcohol outcomes, but specific associations differed by trial and outcome. Discussion of safer-use strategies appears helpful; however, further research is needed to firmly establish how this HaRT-A component works.

Specific emotion and momentary emotion regulation in adolescence and early adulthood.

Emotion regulation (ER) is an important factor in resilience and overall well-being throughout development, and youth report increased variation in emotion and capacity for regulation across adolescence and early adulthood. Specific emotions may be associated with the use of different ER strategies, but much evidence exclusively collapses across negative and positive affect or may not reflect the daily experience of emotion and emotion regulation. The present study examined associations between the experience of unique positive and negative emotions and the use of common ER strategies in adolescence and early adulthood during daily life using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). The sample included 184 high school and college students (55% female, Mage = 17.88, SD = 1.25) who completed EMA surveys three times daily for 10 days (89% compliance). Participants reported on their recent emotional states and which of eight ER strategies they had used. Multilevel logistic regressions tested emotions as predictors of ER strategies, separately for each emotion-ER strategy combination across 96 total models, using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate. Individuals had higher odds of engaging in maladaptive ER strategies, particularly suppression or rumination, when reporting most types of negative emotions-with the largest associations among unhappiness and anger. Conversely, positive emotions were generally linked to reported use of no ER strategies, though happiness and engagement were related to higher odds of problem-solving, while calm was related to less use of nearly all strategies. Specific emotion-strategy combinations may have implications for clinical targets. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).