United Arab Emirates Consensus Recommendations for Management of Acne Vulgaris.

Acne in the United Arab Emirates is a common disease that causes burden to patients, has psychosocial impacts, and is associated with physical sequelae such as dyspigmentation and scarring. This guideline, which was developed from an evaluation of existing international and national evidence-based acne guidelines along with live meetings of United Arab Emirates acne experts, is designed to facilitate the management of acne in the UAE health care system. It discusses the evaluation of acne severity, evidence-based guidance on acne treatment, and strategies for the management of this chronic disease. Effective treatment of active lesions and prevention of sequela is likely to improve the health of many United Arab Emirates patients with acne. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(8):653-660.  doi:10.36849/JDD.7748R1.

Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis in the United Arab Emirates.

Atopic dermatitis often begins in infancy and follows a chronic course of exacerbations and remissions. The etiology is complex and involves numerous factors that contribute to skin barrier defect and inflammation. In the Middle East, the burden of atopic dermatitis is understudied. Epidemiological data specific to the Gulf region are scarce but reveal a prevalence of up to about 40% in the United Arab Emirates. Region-specific factors, such as the climate and the frequency of consanguineous marriages, may affect atopic dermatitis incidence, prevalence, and evolution over time. A panel of experts predominantly from the United Arab Emirates analyzed the evidence from published guidelines, and considered expert guidance and local treatment practices to develop clear recommendations for the management of atopic dermatitis in the United Arab Emirates. They encourage a systematic approach for the diagnosis and treatment, using disease severity scores and quality-of-life measurement tools. Treatment recommendations take into consideration both established therapies and the approved systemic biologics dupilumab and tralokinumab, and the Janus kinase inhibitors baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib.

Paradoxical Psoriasis and Worsening Spondylitis Due to Secukinumab in a Patient With Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is an autoimmune disease primarily affecting the axial skeleton, with associated extra-musculoskeletal manifestations. Treatment strategies targeting cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 17 (IL-17) have proven effective. However, paradoxical reactions, including paradoxical psoriasis and arthritis, have been reported in axSpA patients receiving TNF-α inhibitors. IL-17 inhibitors have been used as an alternative treatment option, but paradoxical reactions have also been rarely observed. This case report presents a 45-year-old man with axSpA who responded to infliximab for six years before discontinuing it due to secondary failure. After the washout period of infliximab, he was started on secukinumab but developed paradoxical psoriasis and worsening of inflammatory back pain after receiving the second loading dose which necessitated replacing it with upadacitinib. Complete resolution of paradoxical psoriasis and significant improvement in his back pain after three months ensued. This case contributes to understanding the complex dynamics in treating axSpA and managing paradoxical reactions.

Humanistic and Economic Burden of Atopic Dermatitis for Adults and Adolescents in the Middle East and Africa Region.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease that poses a significant burden on both patients and the society. AD causes the highest loss in disability-adjusted life years compared with other skin diseases. This study aimed to estimate the economic and humanistic burden of AD in adults and adolescents in seven countries in the Middle East and Africa region (Egypt, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Algeria, South Africa, and United Arab Emirates). METHODS: We conducted a literature review to identify country-specific data on this disease. Subsequently, meetings were organized with experts from each country to complete the missing data. The data were aggregated and calculation models were created to estimate the value of the humanistic and economic burden of the disease in each country. Finally, we conducted meetings with local experts to validate the results, and the necessary adjustments were made. RESULTS: On average, a patient with AD loses 0.19 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) annually owing to this disease. The average annual healthcare cost per patient is highest in the United Arab Emirates, with an estimated value of US $3569 and a population-level indirect cost of US $112.5 million. The included countries allocated a range of 0.20-0.77% of their healthcare expenditure to AD-related healthcare services and technologies. The indirect cost of AD represents approximately 67% of the total disease cost and, on average, approximately 0.043% (range 0.022-0.059%) of the gross domestic product (GDP) of each country. CONCLUSION: Although the humanistic and economic burdens differ from country to country, AD carries a significant socioeconomic burden in all countries. The quality of life is severely affected by the disease. If AD is controlled, the costs, especially indirect costs, could decrease and the disease burden could be alleviated significantly.

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic condition characterized by inflamed and itchy skin. The prevalence and symptoms of atopic dermatitis are observed to increase in dry weather. Owing to its high prevalence in children, the majority of studies on atopic dermatitis are in children. Although it is also prevalent in adults and adolescents, its burden on adults has not been sufficiently studied, especially in Africa and the Middle East. This study quantified the burden of atopic dermatitis in adults and adolescents in seven countries in the Middle East and Africa. We estimated the economic and humanistic burden of this disease. We conducted a literature review and expert interviews to determine the effects on patients and caregivers. We created mathematical models to calculate the disease burden in each country, and local experts in each country validated the data. The study results showed that atopic dermatitis significantly affects the quality of life of patients. The direct medical costs of treatment in each country were calculated. The management of atopic dermatitis consumes around 0.20­0.77% of the healthcare expenditure in a country. The indirect cost of atopic dermatitis represents 0.022­0.059% of the gross domestic product (GDP) of a country. The country-specific burden data are essential to guide decision-makers in arriving at evidence-based decisions and efficiently allocating available resources. This study focused on the significant indirect economic burden of the disease, which can sometimes be underestimated because the disease is not fatal.