Helmet Usage Reduces Serious Head Injury Without Decreasing Concussion After Bicycle Riders Crash.

BACKGROUND: The importance of bicycle helmets in reducing injuries is unclear. Our center receives a disproportionate number of bicycle crash victims. We sought to evaluate the types of injuries observed and the role of helmets in reducing head injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated demographic data and compared injuries between bicycle riders that crashed with and without helmets over a 9-year period. Categorical variables were compared using linear regression methods and nominal variables using ANOVA. Differences were considered significant for P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There were 906 patients evaluated, 701 with helmets (77%) and 205 (23%) without helmets. The mean Injury Severity Score was 9.3 ± 6.4. The most common injuries were concussion (n = 385), rib fractures (n = 154), clavicle fractures (n = 139), facial fractures (n = 102), and cervical spine fractures (n = 89). There was no significant difference in the number of patients with a concussion in riders with or without helmets, [299/701, 42.6% versus 86/205, 42.0%, respectively, (P = NS)]. In helmet versus no helmet riders, there were significantly fewer patients with facial fractures, [67/701, 9.5%, versus 35/205, 17.0%, respectively, (P = 0.003)], skull fractures [8/701, 1.1% versus 9/205, 4.4%, respectively, (P = 0.003)], and serious head injuries [6/701, 0.85% versus 8/205, 3.9%, respectively, (P = 0.002)]. CONCLUSIONS: Helmeted patients involved in bicycle crashes are less likely to sustain a serious head injury, a skull fracture, or facial fractures compared to riders without helmets. The most common injury in patients with a bicycle crash is a concussion. Helmets did not prevent concussion after bicycle rider's crash in our patient population.

Increased risk of vascular thrombosis in pediatric liver transplant recipients with thrombophilia.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients who undergo liver transplantation are at higher risk of developing vascular complications when compared to adult liver transplant recipients. The consequences of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) or portal vein thrombosis (PVT) can cause significant morbidity and mortality. We examined pediatric liver transplant recipients who developed vascular thrombosis and the presence of thrombophilia. METHODS: We examined outcome in all pediatric patients who underwent liver transplantation. Recipient, donor demographic data, and outcome data were examined. Categorical differences were compared using the unpaired Student t-test and nominal variables using either the chi-square or the Fischer exact test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Forty-six pediatric patients underwent liver transplantation. Twenty-one recipients were found to have thrombophilia, including 5 with HAT and 2 with PVT. When comparing recipients with or without any vascular thrombosis, those with thrombophilia had a significantly higher incidence of developing a vascular thrombosis (7/21 versus 0/25, P = 0.0017). Five of 42 recipients with artery-to-artery reconstruction developed HAT versus 0 of 4 with a conduit. Recipients who developed any thrombosis were significantly lower in weight than those who did not develop any thrombosis (9.0 ± 1.6 kg versus 22.2 ± 16.0 kg, P = 0.0366). CONCLUSIONS: All pediatric liver transplant recipients who developed any vascular thrombosis were also found to have thrombophilia. Recipients who were smaller in size were at significantly higher risk of developing vascular thrombosis. Lower weight recipients with thrombophilia may benefit from arterial reconstruction with a conduit to decrease the risk of vascular thrombosis.

Increase in trauma volume as compared to emergency department volume during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: During the months between April through June 2020 when we experienced the largest number of COVID-19 patients in our hospital, the volume of patients in the Emergency Department (ED) was decreased by more than 30%. In contrast to most early reports we did not notice a decrease in trauma volume during this time period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared trauma patients presenting to our Level III Trauma Center, between April 2019 through June 2019 to those presenting from April 2020 through June 2020, the initial surge in COVID-19 patients. We compared ground level falls (GLF), motor vehicle crashes (MVC), bicycle and skateboard crashes, assault, and other. RESULTS: There was a 13% increase in trauma patients presenting during the study period in 2020 as compared to 2019, and the total number of trauma patients as a percentage of total ED patients also increased 269/9235 (2.9%) to 308/6216 (5.0%), P < 0.0001. There was no significant difference in demographics or outcome data between the trauma patients presenting during the two time periods. Although traffic decreased by more than 40%, the number of MVC's was similar. CONCLUSION: The volume of patients presenting to our Trauma Center as compared to the total ED volume increased during the time period from April through June 2020 versus the year just prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the fact that the total traffic volume decreased more than 40 percent between these two time periods, the actual number of motor vehicle crashes remained similar.

The cost of resident education.

BACKGROUND: Patients cared for by surgeons with resident coverage have an increase in cost versus those patients cared for by surgeons without resident coverage, despite no significant difference in complications. We evaluated the reasons for the disparate cost. METHODS: In a single institutional analysis, patients received their care from a group of eight surgeons, four with and four without resident coverage. We analyzed ancillary costs, including pharmacy, radiology, laboratory, and central supply costs, and length of stay, total cost, and hospital margin for these patients. In a separate analysis, we compared data that contributes to cost from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, including age in years, ASA class I-IV, total operating room time in minutes (min), length of hospital stay in days (d), number of patients with a return to OR in 30 d, and complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in ancillary costs in patients cared for by residents. The length of stay was longer in patients cared for by residents (3.3 versus 4.6 d, no resident versus resident, respectively, P = 0.0001). When adjusted for the length of stay, the difference between total costs was $1949/d versus $2103/d (P = NS) for the no resident versus resident groups, respectively. There were 32,685 patients evaluated in the NSQIP database. In all comparisons, operating room time was significantly longer in patients with procedures involving residents. CONCLUSION: The increase in cost in patients cared for by surgeons with residents is not from significant differences in ancillary costs, and may be from length of stay. Surgical procedures are significantly longer with resident involvement.

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is safer than open repair: analysis of the NSQIP data.

INTRODUCTION: Previous single institutional studies have demonstrated fewer complications in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) compared to open ventral hernia repair (OVHR). We questioned whether or not these data were supported in large cross-sectional studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database comparing all LVHR versus primary OVHR for patients from 2005 to 2006. We compared demographic data, ASA class, wound classification, and outcome data. We also evaluated recurrent open repair (R-OVHR) data. Differences were considered significant for P < or = 0.05. No statistical comparisons were made with the R-OVHR group. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographic data, except older age, between the LVHR and OVHR groups. Wound and ASA classifications were not different. There were fewer total complications (5.7% versus 9.8%, P<0.001), and fewer superficial (1.5% versus 4.1%, P<0.001) and deep (0.5% versus 1.6%, P=0.001) infections in the laparoscopic group. There were more total and infectious complications in the R-OVHR group. CONCLUSION: Despite no differences in ASA class or wound classification, there were more total and infectious complications in the OVHR group. This large cross-sectional study supports single institutional studies that demonstrate fewer complications and infections in patients with laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair.

Dual-kidney transplants: long-term results.

BACKGROUND: Dual-kidney transplantation, where two usually aged adult kidneys are placed into an adult recipient, is one way to help alleviate the continuing disparity between the number of patients on the kidney transplant waiting list and those who receive kidney transplants each year. The Dual Kidney Registry was developed to analyze donor and recipient data and outcomes at several centers. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-seven patients who have undergone transplantation since 1994 have been entered into the relational database. The patients were followed yearly after initial entry into the database. RESULTS: The mean donor age was 58+/-13 years and the mean terminal creatinine clearance was 77+/-40 mL/min. The mean glomerular sclerosis on procurement biopsy was 16+/-13%. Delayed graft function (DGF), defined as dialysis in the first 7 days after transplantation, was a predictor of poor outcome, and increased cold storage time was a predictor of DGF. The overall incidence of DGF was 27%. In recipients with prompt graft function (PGF), the mean cold storage time was 22+/-9 hr versus 29+/-10 hr in recipients with DGF (P<0.001). The overall 1- and 5-year graft survival was 86% and 69%, respectively. The 1- and 5-year graft survival rates were significantly better in recipients with PGF (90% and 74%) versus DGF (79% and 54%) (P<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Cold storage time and DGF have a significant impact on the 1- and 5-year graft survival in recipients of dual-kidney transplants. The 5-year graft survival in recipients of dual-kidney transplants is excellent.

Dual-kidney transplantation with organs from expanded criteria donors: a long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Since 1995, dual-kidney transplantation using organs from marginal donors has been used at our center to expand the organ donor pool and decrease the waiting time for deceased donor kidney transplantation. This approach has allowed for a shorter waiting period without compromising outcome in the early posttransplant period. We now have 8-year follow-up in the first recipients. Older individuals were offered this option preferentially, because we reasoned that they would stand to benefit most from the shorter waiting period. METHODS: Patients aged 55 years or more who underwent either dual-kidney transplantation with expanded criteria donors or single-kidney transplantation with standard donors were included in this study. All expanded criteria donor organs were those that were refused by all other local transplant centers. The primary endpoints were recipient death and graft failure. RESULTS: Waiting time for dual-kidney transplantation was 440 +/- 38 days versus 664 +/- 51 days for single-kidney transplantation (P<0.01). The 8-year actuarial patient survivals for the single- and dual-kidney transplants were 74.1% and 82.1%, respectively. The 8-year actuarial graft survivals for the single- and dual-kidney transplants were 59.4% and 69.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Eight-year actuarial patient and graft survivals in older individuals who underwent dual-kidney transplantation are equivalent to those who underwent standard single-kidney transplantation. With the continuing organ shortage and increasing waiting times for cadaver kidney transplantation, dual-kidney transplantation using organs that would otherwise be discarded offers a good option for older individuals who may not withstand a long waiting period.

Randomized trial of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: results at three years.

METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive tacrolimus (TAC) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), TAC + azathioprine (AZA), or cyclosporine (Neoral; CsA) + MMF. All regimens contained corticosteroids, and antibody induction was used only in patients who experienced delayed graft function (DGF). Patients were followed-up for 3 years. RESULTS: The results at 3 years corroborate and extend the findings of the 2-year results. Patients with DGF treated with TAC+MMF experienced an increase in 3-year allograft survival compared with patients receiving CsA+MMF (84.1% vs. 49.9%, P=0.02). Patients randomized to either treatment arm containing TAC exhibited numerically superior kidney function when compared with CsA. During the 3 years, new-onset insulin dependence occurred in 6, 3, and 11 patients in the TAC+MMF, CsA+MMF, and TAC+AZA treatment arms, respectively. Furthermore, patients randomized to TAC+MMF received significantly lower doses of MMF as compared with those who received CsA+MMF. CONCLUSION: All three immunosuppressive regimens provided excellent safety and efficacy. However, the best results overall were achieved with TAC+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients with DGF. In patients who experienced DGF, graft survival was better at 3 years in those patients receiving TAC in combination with either MMF or AZA as compared with the patients receiving CsA with MMF.

Resident versus no resident: a single institutional study on operative complications, mortality, and cost.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated an increase in surgical morbidity, mortality, duration of stay, and costs in teaching hospitals. These studies are confounded by many variables. Controlling for these variables, we studied the effect of surgical residents on these outcomes during rotations with non-academic-based teaching faculty at a teaching hospital. METHODS: Patients received care at a single teaching hospital from a group of 8 surgeons. Four surgeons did not have resident coverage (group 1) and the other 4 had coverage (group 2). Continuous severity adjusted complications, mortality, length of stay, cost, and hospital margin data were collected and compared. RESULTS: Five common procedures were examined: bowel resection, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hernia, mastectomy, and appendectomy. Comparing all procedures together, there were no differences in complications between the groups, although there was greater mortality, a greater duration of stay, and higher costs in group 2. When comparing the 5 most common procedures individually, there was no difference in complications or mortality, although a greater length of stay and higher costs in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing the most common procedures performed individually, patients cared for by surgeons with surgical residents at a teaching hospital have an increase in duration of stay and cost, although no difference in complications or mortality compared to surgeons without residents.

Validation of a screening protocol for identifying low-risk candidates with type 1 diabetes mellitus for kidney with or without pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Certain clinical risk factors are associated with significant coronary artery disease in kidney transplant candidates with diabetes mellitus. We sought to validate the use of a clinical algorithm in predicting post-transplantation mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes. We also examined the prevalence of significant coronary lesions in high-risk transplant candidates. METHODS: All patients with type 1 diabetes evaluated between 1991 and 2001 for kidney with/without pancreas transplantation were classified as high-risk based on the presence of any of the following risk factors: age >or=45 yr, smoking history >or=5 pack years, diabetes duration >or=25 yr or any ST-T segment abnormalities on electrocardiogram. Remaining patients were considered low risk. All high-risk candidates were advised to undergo coronary angiography. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality post-transplantation. RESULTS: Eighty-four high-risk and 42 low-risk patients were identified. Significant coronary artery stenosis was detected in 31 high-risk candidates. Mean arterial pressure was a significant predictor of coronary stenosis (odds ratio 1.68; 95% confidence interval 1.14-2.46), adjusted for age, sex and duration of diabetes. In 75 candidates who underwent transplantation with median follow-up of 47 months, the use of clinical risk factors predicted all eight deaths. No deaths occurred in low-risk patients. A significant mortality difference was noted between the two risk groups (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This clinical algorithm can identify patients with type 1 diabetes at risk for mortality after kidney with/without pancreas transplant. Patients without clinical risk factors can safely undergo transplantation without further cardiac evaluation.

Excellent outcome in infants and small children with thrombophilias undergoing kidney transplantation.

One of the most common causes of early graft failure in children undergoing renal transplantation is vascular thrombosis. Numerous risk factors for graft thrombosis have been previously described. Children with various types of thrombophilias such as protein C, protein S and factor V Leiden deficiencies are at an increased risk for vascular thrombosis. Infants and small children with these disorders undergoing renal transplantation have not been well documented in the literature. We reviewed our experience in the diagnosis, peri-operative management and follow up of these patients at our institution. A retrospective analysis of all children undergoing renal transplantation at our institution, using data obtained from the Pediatric Transplant Registry at our institution since May 2000 was performed. The indications for renal transplant included focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, renal dysplasia and reflux nephropathy. One patient had factor V Leiden mutation and two patients had protein S deficiency. Patients were anticoagulated in the peri-operative and post-transplant period. All index transplants were performed with living donor kidneys. There were no adverse outcomes in children with thrombophilias despite having significantly lower weight at the time of transplant vs. children without thrombophilia. The incidence of graft thrombosis in the pediatric renal transplant recipients is high. We identify a potential cause of thrombosis in children not well documented in the literature. A high index of suspicion combined with preoperative screening and diagnosis of thrombophilias and an appropriate treatment plan may decrease the incidence of graft thrombosis in infants and small children undergoing renal transplantation.

Renal vascular response to static handgrip exercise: sympathetic vs. autoregulatory control.

Static exercise causes activation of the sympathetic nervous system, which results in increased blood pressure (BP) and renal vascular resistance (RVR). The question arises as to whether renal vasoconstriction that occurs during static exercise is due to sympathetic activation and/or related to a pressure-dependent renal autoregulatory mechanism. To address this issue, we monitored renal blood flow velocity (RBV) responses to two different handgrip (HG) exercise paradigms in 7 kidney transplant recipients (RTX) and 11 age-matched healthy control subjects. Transplanted kidneys are functionally denervated. Beat-by-beat analyses of changes in RBV (observed via duplex ultrasound), BP, and heart rate were performed during HG exercise in all subjects. An index of RVR was calculated as BP/RBV. In protocol 1, fatiguing HG exercise (40% of maximum voluntary contraction) led to significant increases in RVR in both groups. However, at the end of exercise, RVR was more than fourfold higher in control subjects than in the RTX group (88 vs. 20% increase over baseline; interaction, P < 0.001). In protocol 2, short bouts of HG exercise (15 s) led to significant increases in RVR at higher workloads (50 and 70% of maximum voluntary contraction) in the control subjects (P < 0.001). RVR did not increase in the RTX group. In conclusion, we observed grossly attenuated renal vasoconstrictor responses to exercise in RTX subjects, in whom transplanted kidneys were considered functionally denervated. Our results suggest that renal vasoconstrictor responses to exercise in conscious humans are mainly dependent on activation of a neural mechanism.