Association between CT-based body composition assessment and patient outcomes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize the body composition of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), identify factors associated with sarcopenia at diagnosis, and evaluate the impact of pretreatment sarcopenia and changes in body composition parameters during therapy on perioperative and disease-related outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing NACT for EOC between 2008 and 2020 were identified. Pre-treatment and post-treatment contrast-enhanced CT scans were reviewed to determine skeletal muscle index (SMI) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area at the mid-fourth lumbar vertebral level. SMI and VAT were analyzed for association with clinical and treatment variables. RESULTS: 174 patients were identified. Mean pretreatment SMI and VAT were 38.3 cm2/m2 ± 7.9 and 51.2 cm2/m2 ± 34.3, respectively. Comparatively, mean post-treatment SMI and VAT were 37.8 cm2/m2 ± 7.9 and 43.7 cm2/m2 ± 29.7, respectively. Most patients exhibited an overall decrease in SMI from pretreatment to posttreatment scans. Caucasian race, older age, and lower body mass index at diagnosis were associated with lower pretreatment SMI. Lower pre-treatment SMI was associated with lower surgical complexity scores (p < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (p = 0.029). Decrease in SMI after NACT was associated with increased rates of ICU admissions and length of stay. While there was no association between SMI and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), >2% decrease per 100 days in VAT was significantly associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lower pretreatment SMI tend to undergo less complex surgery than those with higher SMI despite NACT. Decrease in VAT may be a potential indicator of worse OS. Information on body composition can aid in clinical decision making in patients with EOC.

Safety and efficacy of topical artesunate for the treatment of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of topical artesunate ointment for treatment of biopsy-confirmed Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) 2/3. METHODS: Participants were enrolled on a prospective, IRB-approved, dose-escalation phase I trial testing either 1, 2 or 3 treatment cycles (5 days), every other week, as applicable. Clinical assessments were completed prior to each dose cycle and included exam and review of adverse event (AE) diary cards. HPV testing and colposcopy was completed at 15 and 28 weeks. AEs were assessed according to CTCAE 4.0 criteria. Complete responders (CR) underwent biopsy of the treated site at the 28-weeks while partial (PR) and non (NR)-responders underwent surgical resection or biopsy and ablation. RESULTS: Fifteen patients consented to and began treatment. Per-protocol assessments were completed in 100% at 15- and 80% at 28-weeks. All patients completed prescribed cycles with no grade 3 or 4 AEs. Vulvovaginal burning/ was the most common AE occurring in 93.3%. AEs were grade 2 in 23.7% and included vulvovaginal pruritus (n = 3), swelling (n = 3) and candidiasis (n = 2). The highest ORR was in the 3-cycle group (88.9% with 55.6% CR). HPV-16 was detected either alone (46.7%) or with other subtypes (33.3%) in 80% of lesions and 5 of 8 (62.5%) with CR had complete viral clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Topical artesunate for treatment of high-grade VIN shows high tolerability, low toxicity and evidence for clinical response in this initial small series. The safety and observed responses support further study in a Phase II trial.

Impact of comorbidities and extent of lymphadenectomy on quality of life in endometrial cancer patients treated with minimally invasive surgery in the era of sentinel lymph nodes.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of quality of life (QoL) among patients who undergo surgical staging with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy or lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for primary endometrial cancer at the Mayo Clinic from October 2013 to June 2016 were mailed a 30-item QoL in Cancer survey (QLQ-C30) and a validated 13-item lower extremity lymphedema screening questionnaire. Patients who answered <50% of the items or had a pre-operative history of lymphedema were excluded. Multivariable linear regression models were fit to evaluate predictors of QoL using inverse-probability of treatment weighting to adjust for differences at the time of the surgery between the lymphadenectomy and SLN groups. RESULTS: The 221 patients included in the analysis were stratified into two groups: patients who underwent (1) bilateral lymphadenectomy as 'backup' after SLN mapping (lymphadenectomy group; n=101) or (2) SLN removal with or without side-specific lymphadenectomy (SLN group; n=120). On multivariable analysis, obesity, lower extremity lymphedema, and kidney disease had significant (p<0.05) and clinically meaningful negative impacts on global QoL. Declines in average adjusted global QoL scores were marked (19.7 points lower) in patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and lower extremity lymphedema compared with non-obese patients without lower extremity lymphedema. In contrast, there was only a 2.9 point difference in the adjusted average global QoL score between the SLN and lymphadenectomy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity lymphedema coupled with obesity predicts poorer QoL in patients who undergo surgical staging for endometrial cancer. In this population, reduction of lower extremity lymphedema by performing SLN instead of lymphadenectomy and earlier targeted interventions may improve patients' QoL. Future research focusing on targeted interventions is needed.

Prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes in low risk endometrial cancer: results from an international multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: The prognostic significance of isolated tumor cells (≤0.2 mm) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of endometrial cancer patients is still unclear. Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in patients with low risk endometrial cancer who underwent SLN biopsy and did not receive adjuvant therapy. Outcomes were compared with node negative patients. METHODS: Patients with SLNs-isolated tumor cells between 2013 and 2019 were identified from 15 centers worldwide, while SLN negative patients were identified from Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between 2013 and 2018. Only low risk patients (stage IA, endometrioid histology, grade 1 or 2) who did not receive any adjuvant therapy were included. Primary outcomes were recurrence free, non-vaginal recurrence free, and overall survival, evaluated with Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: 494 patients (42 isolated tumor cells and 452 node negative) were included. There were 21 (4.3%) recurrences (5 SLNs-isolated tumor cells, 16 node negative); recurrence was vaginal in six patients (1 isolated tumor cells, 5 node negative), and non-vaginal in 15 (4 isolated tumor cells, 11 node negative). Median follow-up among those without recurrence was 2.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.1-3.0) and 2.6 years (IQR 0.6-4.2) in the SLN-isolated tumor cell and node negative patients, respectively. The presence of SLNs-isolated tumor cells, lymphovascular space invasion, and International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) grade 2 were significant risk factors for recurrence on univariate analysis. SLN-isolated tumor cell patients had worse recurrence free survival (p<0.01) and non-vaginal recurrence free survival (p<0.01) compared with node negative patients. Similar results were observed in the subgroup of patients without lymphovascular space invasion (n=480). There was no difference in overall survival between the two cohorts in the full sample and the subset excluding patients with lymphovascular space invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SLNs-isolated tumor cells and low risk profile, without adjuvant therapy, had a significantly worse recurrence free survival compared with node negative patients with similar risk factors, after adjusting for grade and excluding patients with lymphovascular space invasion. However, the presence of SLNs-isolated tumor cells was not associated with worse overall survival.

Preoperative assessment using the five-factor modified frailty index: A call for standardized preoperative assessment and prehabilitation services in gynecologic oncology.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI) is associated with postoperative complications, readmissions or non-home discharge in gynecologic cancer patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of gynecologic cancer (cervical, uterine, or ovarian cancer) who underwent surgery between 2014 and 2018 were identified through the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. The 5-factor mFI was applied and patients classified into 6 categories (mFI groups 0,1,2, 3, 4 and 5). The incidence of 30-day complications, readmissions and non-home discharge was evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between mFI category and readmissions/ complications. Adjusted probabilities of events were calculated based on patient characteristics. RESULTS: At total of 31,181 gynecologic cancer cases were included in the analysis: N = 2968 (9.4%) cervical, N = 20,862 (66.4%) uterine, and N = 7351 (23.4%) ovarian cancers. Of all patients, 46.1% were in category 0, 36.5% category 1, and 1% category 3-5. Factors associated with increased mFI included older age, African American race, laparoscopic surgery and obesity. A significant dose-response relationship between higher mFI and readmission and 30-day complications was noted on adjusted multivariable analysis (adjusted OR 2.37 (1.65-3.45) and 2.10 (1.59-2.75) for readmissions and complications, respectively, in mFI category 3-5). These associations were consistent within each cancer type. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-factor mFI universally predicts postoperative readmissions, 30-day complications and non-home discharge in patients with gynecologic cancer. Incorporation of mFI into routine preoperative assessment can identify patients for non-surgical treatments, prehabiliatation and short term home assessments.

Not all stage I and II endometrial cancers are created equal: Recurrence-free survival and cause-specific survival after observation or vaginal brachytherapy alone in all subgroups of early-stage high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) after observation or vaginal brachytherapy (VB) alone in all subgroups of early-stage high-intermediate (HIR) and high-risk endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: We identified patients with stage I HIR (GOG-249 criteria) and stage II endometrioid EC, and stage I and II non-endometrioid EC who underwent surgery at Mayo Clinic and Cleveland Clinic between 1999 and 2016. Three-year RFS and CSS after observation or VB only were estimated in 16 subgroups defined by risk factors. RESULTS: Among 4156 ECs, we identified 447 (10.8%) stage I endometrioid HIR, 52 (1.3%) stage II endometrioid, 350 (8.4%) stage I non-endometrioid, and 17 (0.4%) stage II non-endometrioid ECs; observation or VB alone was applied in 349 (78.1%), 24 (46.2%), 187 (53.4%), and 2 (11.8%) patients, respectively. After observation or VB, stage I HIR endometrioid EC subgroups with <2 factors among grade 3, LVSI, or stage IB had a 3-year CSS >95% (lower 95% confidence intervals limit: 89.8%), whereas subgroups with ≥2 factors had poorer outcomes. No EC-related deaths after 3 years were reported in 97 stage IA non-endometrioid ECs without myometrial invasion. Stage II ECs had poor outcomes regardless of histology. CONCLUSIONS: Observation or VB only may be sufficient in stage I endometrioid HIR ECs with <2 factors among grade 3, LVSI, or IB and in stage IA non-endometrioid ECs without myometrial invasion. Stratification of early-stage HIR and high-risk ECs into risk subgroups potentially alleviates the overtreatment and undertreatment risk and should be considered in future research.

Impact of treatment modality on overall survival in women with advanced endometrial cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate overall survival (OS) in women with advanced endometrial cancer (EC) following chemotherapy alone (CT), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery (NACT + IDS) or primary cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy (PCS + CT). METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with stage III/IV EC from 2004 to 2015. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses assessed the impact of treatment modality upon OS. RESULTS: Of 48,179 women identified, 5531 received CT (11.5%), 2614 NACT + IDS (5.4%) and 40,034 PCS + CT (83.1%). Median OS was 11.1 months for CT, 25.1 months for NACT + IDS and 60.9 months for PCS + CT (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, NACT + IDS (HR 0.44 (0.40, 0.49); p < 0.001) and PCS + CT (HR 0.32 (0.30, 0.35); p < 0.001) were associated with improved OS vs. CT alone. Age, African American race, income, higher Charlson comorbidity index and grade were predictors of worse OS (p < 0.001). On subgroup analysis by stage (III/IV) and histology (Type I/II), PCS + CT improved OS for all patients, compared to NACT + IDS (p < 0.001) and CT (p < 0.001). NACT + IDS was associated with improved OS vs. CT in stage III type I (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.38, 0.67; p < 0.001), stage IV type I (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.35, 0.52; p < 0.001), and stage IV type II EC (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.36, 0.51; p < 0.001), but not stage III type II EC (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.56, 1.03; p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In women with advanced EC, PCS + CT is associated with improved OS compared to NACT + IDS or CT alone, regardless of stage or histology. Additionally, NACT + IDS is associated with superior OS in stage III type I and all stage IV EC compared to CT alone. Where feasible, surgery should be incorporated into treatment planning in women with advanced EC.

Development and validation of a comprehensive clinical risk-scoring model for prediction of overall survival in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a comprehensive overall survival (OS) risk-scoring model in women with endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: Patients with EC diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 were identified through the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Patients with known lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) status who were treated surgically (with or without adjuvant therapy) were included. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify prognostic factors for OS. This model was used to assign points based on hazard ratios for risk factors and a risk score was obtained. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to categorize patients into risk groups. Results were internally validated in a cohort of patients from our institution (CCF cohort). Risk scores were calculated and assessed in a Cox regression model, and Harrell's c-index was calculated to assess model fit. RESULTS: Among 349,404 women with EEC during the study period, 42,107 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Factors associated with worse OS were age ≥ 60, African American race, Charlson-Deyo score 1 or 2+, higher grade, LVSI, tumor size ≥2 cm, and no lymphadenectomy performed. Six risk groups were identified (scores 0-30) and OS estimated for each risk group. Risk score per 1-point increase in HR were comparable between NCDB and CCF cohorts (HR 1.21 (1.20-1.22 p < 0.001 vs 1.18 (1.12-1.25), p < 0.001), and c-index 0.80 (0.79-0.81) vs. 0.77 (0.68-0.86). Similar analysis was done in stage IA and IB. Adjuvant therapy had a beneficial effect on survival in the majority of stage IB patients, but only one of the six risk groups in stage IA EC. CONCLUSIONS: We report a comprehensive validated OS risk-scoring model for patients with.

Oncologic outcomes of endometrial cancer in patients with low-volume metastasis in the sentinel lymph nodes: An international multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess oncologic outcomes in endometrial cancer patients with low-volume metastasis (LVM) in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). METHODS: Patients with endometrial cancer and SLN-LVM (≤2 mm) from December 3, 2009, to December 31, 2018, were retrospectively identified from 22 centers worldwide. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV, adnexal involvement, or unknown adjuvant therapy (ATx) were excluded. RESULTS: Of 247 patients included, 132 had isolated tumor cell (ITC) and 115 had micrometastasis (MM). Overall 4-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 77.6% (95% CI, 70.2%-85.9%); median follow-up for patients without recurrence was 29.6 (interquartile range, 19.2-41.5) months. At multivariate analysis, Non-endometrioid (NE) (HR, 5.00; 95% CI, 2.50-9.99; P < .001), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (HR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.45-7.31; P = .004), and uterine serosal invasion (USI) (HR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.44-9.54; P = .007) were independent predictors of recurrence. Among 47 endometrioid ITC patients without ATx, 4-year RFS was 82.6% (95% CI, 70.1%-97.2). Considering 18 ITC patients with endometrioid grade 1 disease, without LVSI, USI, or ATx, only 1 had recurrence (median follow-up, 24.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SLN-LVM, NE, LVSI, and USI were independent risk factors for recurrence. Patients with any risk factor had poor prognosis, even when receiving ATx. Patients with ITC and grade 1 endometrioid disease (no LVSI/USI) had favorable prognosis, even without ATx. Further analysis (with more patients and longer follow-up) is needed to assess whether ATx can be withheld in this low-risk subgroup.

Diet and gut microbiome interactions in gynecologic cancer.

Over the last decade, there has been a dramatic surge in research exploring the human gut microbiome and its role in health and disease. It is now widely accepted that commensal microorganisms coexist within the human gastrointestinal tract and other organs, including those of the reproductive tract. These microorganisms, which are collectively known as the "microbiome", contribute to maintaining host physiology and to the development of pathology. Next generation sequencing and multi-'omics' technology has enriched our understanding of the complex and interdependent relationship that exists between the host and microbiome. Global changes in the microbiome are known to be influenced by dietary, genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors. Accumulating data have shown that alterations in the gut microbiome contribute to the development, prognosis and treatment of many disease states including cancer primarily through interactions with the immune system. However, there are large gaps in knowledge regarding the association between the gut microbiome and gynecologic cancers, and research characterizing the reproductive tract microbiome is insufficient. Herein, we explore the mechanisms by which alterations in the gut and reproductive tract microbiome contribute to carcinogenesis focusing on obesity, hyperestrogenism, inflammation and altered tumor metabolism. The impact of the gut microbiome on response to anti-cancer therapy is highlighted with an emphasis on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in gynecologic cancers. We discuss dietary interventions that are likely to modulate the metabolic and immunologic milieu as well as tumor microenvironment through the gut microbiome including intermittent fasting/ketogenic diet, high fiber diet, use of probiotics and the metabolic management of obesity. We conclude that enhanced understanding of the microbiome in gynecologic cancers coupled with thorough evaluation of metabolic and metagenomic analyses would enable us to integrate novel preventative strategies and adjunctive interventions into the care of women with gynecologic cancers.

Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of endometrial Cancer patients with mismatch repair deficiency in the era of universal Lynch syndrome screening.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinicopathologic characteristics and survival impact associated with mismatch repair (MMR) deficient subgroups of endometrial cancer (EC) in patients undergoing universal screening for Lynch Syndrome. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using a prospectively maintained gynecologic oncology registry of patients who underwent surgery for EC was conducted. All pathology specimens underwent tumor testing using immunohistochemistry for MMR deficiency with reflex MLH1 promotor methylation testing. Tumors were classified as MMR-I (intact MMR expression), MMR-DM (MMR deficient due to MLH1 methylation), and MMR-DU (MMR deficient without MLH1 methylation). Univariate and multivariate analysis performed to determine factors associated with MMR-DM. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyzed by stage and endometrioid subgroup. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2016, 1018 EC patients were identified and screened. Overall, 71.6% were classified as MMR-I, 23.8% MMR-DM, and 4.6% MMR-DU. In comparison to MMR-DU, MMR-DM tumors were associated with older age, postmenopausal status, lymphovascular space invasion, and pure endometrioid histology. Compared to MMR-I, MMR-DM tumors were associated with older age, endometrioid histology, lymphovascular space invasion, and higher grade on multivariable analysis. There was no difference in PFS and OS between the three groups overall. In patients with endometrioid EC, MMR-DM tumors were associated with lower PFS vs. MMR-I (HR:2.51, CI:1.54, 4.10, P < 0.001). This effect persisted for stage I/II endometrioid EC (HR 2.66, CI:1.34, 5.26 p = 0.005). No difference in PFS or OS was noted among stage III/IV endometrioid tumors. CONCLUSION: MMR deficiency is associated with adverse prognostic factors and worse PFS among endometrioid tumors, particularly in early stage EC. MMR testing outside of LS screening has prognostic value, warranting consideration for inclusion as a biomarker in prospective clinical trials.

Impact of vaginal brachytherapy on survival in stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in use of radiation therapy and its impact on overall survival in low- and high-grade stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with stage I endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2004 to 2013 were identified through the National Cancer Database and classified as: stage IA G1/2, stage IA G3, stage IB G1/2, and stage IB G3. Trends in use of vaginal brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy were assessed. Overall survival was measured from surgery and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The effect of radiation therapy on overall survival was assessed within each stage/grade group using Cox proportional hazards analysis in propensity-matched treatment groups. RESULTS: A total of 132 393 patients met inclusion criteria, and 81% of patients had stage IA and 19% had stage IB endometrial cancer. Adjuvant therapy was administered in 18% of patients: 52% received vaginal brachytherapy, 30% external beam radiation therapy, and 18% chemotherapy ±radiation therapy. External beam radiation therapy use decreased from 9% in 2004 to 4% in 2012, while vaginal brachytherapy use increased from 8% to 14%. Stage IA G1/2 patients did not benefit from either external beam radiation therapy or vaginal brachytherapy, while administration of vaginal brachytherapy improved overall survival in stage IB G1/2 compared with no treatment (p<0.0001). In stage IB G1/2 and stage IA G3, vaginal brachytherapy was superior to external beam radiation therapy (p=0.0004 and p=0.004, respectively). Stage IB G3 patients had improved overall survival with either vaginal brachytherapy or external beam radiation therapy versus no treatment but no difference in overall survival was seen between vaginal brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (p=0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The delivery of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with stage IA G1/2 endometrial carcinoma is not associated with improvement in overall survival. Patients with stage IB G1/2 and G3 as well as stage IA G3 are shown to benefit from improved overall survival when adjuvant radiation therapy is administered. These findings demonstrate potential opportunities to reduce both overtreatment and undertreatment in stage I endometrial cancer patients.

Endometrial cancer in young women: prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in women aged ≤40 years.

OBJECTIVE: Endometrial cancer in pre-menopausal patients aged ≤40 years is rare and poses both diagnostic and management challenges. The goal of this study was to investigate the clinical and pathologic factors associated with endometrial cancer in this group and their impact on survival. METHODS: Patients with endometrial cancer treated between January 2004 and August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent either primary surgical treatment or fertility-sparing therapy were included. Exclusion criteria were age >60 years and patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary radiation. Age at diagnosis was used to classify patients into two groups: ≤40 and 41-60 years. Clinical and pathologic variables were compared between the groups. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: A total of 551 patients were evaluated, of which 103 (18.7%) patients were ≤40 years and 448 (81.3%) were 41-60 years. Age ≤40 years was associated with higher body mass index (38.8 vs 35.8 kg/m2, p=0.008), non-invasive cancers (54.2% vs 32.6%, p<0.001), lower uterine segment involvement (27.2% vs 22.5%, p<0.001), and less lymphovascular space invasion (16.8% vs 29.1%, p=0.015). The rate of synchronous ovarian cancer was 9.2% vs 0.7% in age 41-60 years (p<0.001), and 19% of women with endometrial cancer aged ≤40 years underwent fertility-sparing therapy. Grade, stage, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and lymph node status were associated with survival, and fertility-sparing therapy adversely affected the recurrence rate of the age ≤40 years cohort. Among all patients aged ≤60 years, mismatch repair deficiency due to MLH1 methylation was associated with worse progression-free survival, 48.6% vs 83.3% (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.17, p=0.032), and overall survival, 56.5% vs 90.0% (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.13 to 5.90, p=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged ≤40 years with endometrial cancer have more favorable prognostic factors and higher rates of synchronous tumors. Fertility-sparing therapy was associated with higher recurrence rates. The prognostic value of MLH1 methylation in this population warrants further investigation.

Time to surgery and its impact on survival in patients with endometrial cancer: A National cancer database study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine patient and facility-specific factors associated with time to surgery (TTS) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), and define the impact of delay in TTS >6 weeks on overall survival (OS) by tumor histology and stage. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients with EC who underwent definitive primary surgical treatment between 2004 and 2013. Patients were stratified by EC histology into type I (endometrioid) and type II (non-endometrioid). TTS (number of days from diagnosis to definitive surgery) was calculated and trends in TTS during the study period were analyzed. Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with TTS for patients with type I and type II EC, respectively. Cox regression was used to assess the impact of delay in TTS > 6 weeks on OS by tumor histology and stage. RESULTS: Out of 284,499 patients included in the study, 83% had type I EC and 17% had type II EC. Median (interquartile range; IQR) TTS for type I and II EC was 27 days (10-41) and 26 days (13-40), respectively. TTS increased over the study period in both groups. In Type I EC, delay in TTS was associated with worse OS in patients with early stage (I-II) EC only. In type II EC, delay in TTS had no significant impact on OS in stage I-III EC, while a paradoxical relationship between TTS > 6 weeks and improved OS was observed for stage IV EC. CONCLUSION: TTS increased over the study period. TTS >6 weeks was negatively associated with OS in early stage type I EC. Interventions to reduce TTS in specific stages and settings for EC are necessary given this impact on mortality.

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: a National Cancer Database analysis of prognostic factors and treatment outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Undifferentiated endometrioid endometrial carcinoma of the uterus is a rare, highly aggressive, and under-recognized subtype of endometrial cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates survival, prognostic factors for survival, and treatment outcomes associated with undifferentiated endometrial cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with undifferentiated endometrial cancer who underwent definitive primary surgical treatment. Patients with all other histologic subtypes or incomplete treatment data were excluded. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors for survival. Points for each prognostic factor were assigned from regression coefficients in the final multivariable model and summed for a total score. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to determine cut-offs in the score to identify unique prognostic groups. RESULTS: Among 349 404 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer from 2004 to 2013, 3994 (1.1%) met the criteria for diagnosis of undifferentiated endometrial cancer and 3486 had survival data. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years (interquartile range (IQR) 57-74) and 58% of patients had early stage disease. Median interval from diagnosis to surgery was 3.7 weeks (IQR 2.0-5.7). Five year overall survival was 57% (standard error (SE) 1%). Stage was the strongest predictor of survival, with a 15-20% decrement in 5 year survival for each advance in stage. Stage, age, race, and presence of comorbidities were independent predictors of survival and were used to categorize patients into five prognostic groups. Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival across most disease stages and prognostic groups. Multimodal adjuvant therapy was superior to unimodal treatment particularly in advanced stage unfavorable and very unfavorable groups. CONCLUSION: In women with undifferentiated endometrial cancer, survival is primarily driven by stage. Despite the poor overall prognosis of undifferentiated endometrial cancer, multimodal adjuvant therapy is a key component of treatment.

Perioperative adverse events in women undergoing concurrent urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgeries for suspected malignancy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study's objectives were to compare the incidence of adverse events after concurrent urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgery to gynecologic oncology surgery alone and to describe the frequency of modification in planned urogynecologic procedures. The authors hypothesized there would be no difference in major complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective matched cohort study of women who underwent concurrent surgery at a large tertiary care center between January 2004 and June 2017. Cohorts were matched by surgeon, surgery route, date, and final pathologic diagnosis. Perioperative data and postoperative adverse events classified by Clavien-Dindo grade were compared. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients underwent concurrent surgeries, with 216 matched cohorts. Concurrent-case patients were more likely to be older, postmenopausal, have greater vaginal parity, have had preoperative chemotherapy, and have preoperative cardiac or pulmonary disease. There were no differences in intraoperative complications or Dindo grade ≥ 3 adverse events between groups, but there were more grade 2 adverse events in the concurrent cohort (44 vs 19%, p < 0.0001) including postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) (26 vs 7%, p < 0.0001). Concurrent surgery remained associated with a higher incidence of grade ≥ 2 events on multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR) 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-4.2, p = 0.0004). Discharge with a urinary catheter was more frequent after concurrent cases (35 vs 2%, p < 0.0001). Planned urogynecologic procedures were modified in 10% (n = 11) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent surgeries have an increased incidence of minor but not serious perioperative adverse events. One in ten planned urogynecologic procedures is either modified or abandoned during combined surgeries.

Perioperative Management of Women Undergoing Risk-reducing Surgery for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Carriers of genetic mutations that predispose to cancer syndromes are often faced with complex decisions. For women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in particular, the decision to undergo risk-reducing mastectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is burdensome from a physical and psychological perspective. Although risk-reducing surgery is the most effective preventative measure in reducing a genetic mutation carrier's risk of breast or ovarian cancer, the success of these procedures requires a multidisciplinary approach that centers on careful counseling regarding the risks and benefits of risk-reducing surgery. The physical and psychological distress associated with risk-reducing surgery often makes a combined surgical approach attractive to some patients. In this review, we present the evidence surrounding the comprehensive surgical care of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes and evaluate the perioperative factors that influence surgical management.

Predicting non-home discharge in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: External validation of a predictive model.

OBJECTIVE: To externally validate a model predicting non-home discharge in women undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: Women undergoing primary CRS via laparotomy for EOC at three tertiary medical centers in an academic health system from January 2010 to December 2015 were included. Patients were excluded if they received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, had a non-epithelial malignancy, were not undergoing primary cytoreduction, or lacked documented model components. Non-home discharge included skilled nursing facility, acute rehabilitation facility, hospice, or inpatient death. The predicted probability of non-home discharge was calculated using age, pre-operative CA-125, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status as described in the previously published predictive model. Model discrimination was calculated using a concordance index and calibration curves were plotted to characterize model performance across the cohort. RESULTS: A total of 204 admissions met inclusion criteria. The overall rate of non-home discharge was 12% (95% CI 8-18%). Mean age was 60.8 years (SD 11.0). Median length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer for patients with non-home discharge (8 vs. 5 days, P < 0.001). The predictive model had a concordance index of 0.86 (95% CI 0.76-0.93), which was similar to model performance in the original study (CI 0.88). The model provided accurate predictions across all probabilities (0 to 100%). CONCLUSIONS: Non-home discharge can be accurately predicted using preoperative clinical variables. Use of this validated non-home discharge predictive model may facilitate preoperative patient counseling, early discharge planning, and potentially decrease cost of care.

Intestinal Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Are We Training for the Future?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the scope of intestinal surgery training across gynecologic oncology fellowships in the United States and identify factors associated with perceived preparedness to perform intestinal surgery independently. MATERIALS/METHODS: An institutional review board-approved survey was distributed to Society of Gynecologic Oncology fellows and candidate members within the first 3 years of practice. Questions addressed demographics, operative experience, preparedness and plans for performing intestinal surgery, and attitudes toward gynecologic oncologists (GOs) performing intestinal surgery. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics as well as univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 374 Society of Gynecologic Oncology members invited, 108 (29%) responded, including 38 fellows (35%) and 53 recent graduates (49%). Fifteen (14%) reported more than 3 years of practice and were excluded. Most participants (96%) received intestinal surgery training from GOs, and 64% reported that all faculty routinely performed intestinal surgery. Most participants (81%) believed GOs should perform intestinal procedures, whereas only 58% felt prepared and 59% planned to perform intestinal procedures independently. Fellows who performed more than 10 intestinal diversion procedures, participated directed in intestine-related intraoperative consultations, or reported that all faculty performed intestinal surgery were more likely to feel prepared to perform intestinal surgery independently. Sex, training region, intended practice environment, and fellowship curriculum were not associated with preparedness to perform intestinal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of gynecologic oncology fellows and recent graduates in the United States do not feel prepared to perform intestinal procedures independently after fellowship. Increased volume and direct involvement of fellows in intestinal surgery may improve preparedness for performing intestinal surgery after fellowship.